Re: Delete filter bug?
Good afternoon Gerard, It was foretold that on 11-11-2002 13:35:21 GMT+0100 (which was 13:35:21 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G It will active on both flagged and non-flaged mails. Cab you see the G problem? Could you post the other one too? -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. Windows has detected the windows.dll, this is being removed from your system now. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Monday, November 11, 2002, 3:25:01 PM, you wrote: L Could you post the other one too? Luc, That was the same on as you posted. Shall we continue this on TBTEch? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Good players have the power to think while they are competing. Most golfers are not thinking even when they believe they are. They are only worrying. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good evening Gerard, It was foretold that on 11-11-2002 19:54:52 GMT+0100 (which was 19:54:52 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G Shall we continue this on TBTEch? By all means -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. Not a single one of your ancestors died young. They all copulated at least once. - A cheery thought from Richard Dawkins - British zoologist Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Sunday, November 10, 2002, 3:53:20 AM, you wrote: L Although i'm still puzzled because you say that it is a purchase L request, if it is not I will flag it. On the other hand you say that L the second filter trigger if words in the text that indicate product L that I sell. If that is the case AND it is a purchase request (not L flagged). So, if it's not a purchase request it must be flagged L (first filter) but the second filter you say a request (not L flagged?). Sorry if it takes so much time but i'm curious myself to L see if the filters will work or not :-) Hi Luc, I use it for business hence the Purchase request. - If it is NOT a purchase request, flag it - If it has something I sell in the body and is NOT flagged (its a purchase request and I like selling tings) then - Copy to other folder and mark original read (I do not want to check it twice) I have use your filters which are accurate for the above except for the mark read bit, which I changed and the work as expected. I don't have a clue why this one works and mine don't. I have them working on the same account. I will try and fiddle a bit more with them. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Golfers must learn to love the challenge when they hit a ball into the rough, trees, or sand. The alternatives--anger, fear, whining, and cheating--do no good. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good afternoon Gerard, It was foretold that on 10-11-2002 13:21:54 GMT+0100 (which was 13:21:54 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G I have use your filters which are accurate for the above except for the G mark read bit, which I changed and the work as expected. I'm glad they worked. About the read bit: have you tried enable the mark as read in the second filter: it will mark it as read and copy the message. Although it probably will mark both( original and copy as read) i'm afraid. -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result. - Winston Churchill (1874-1965) - British Prime Minister, writer Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Saturday, November 9, 2002, 12:20:46 AM, you wrote: L Gerard, i fiddled a bit around (but i'm not sure any more if it's what L you want lol) and came up with two filters: the first looks for test L in the subject, flags it and puts it in the folder test. L The second filter looks for hallo in the text, puts it in the folder L test, then copies it in the folder new test. The message is not L flagged is enabled. Is this what you want, because you stated L copied. Hi Luc, The first filter that looks for test in the subject should only flag the email and leave it in the inbox. The second filter should copy the msg to folder test when the word hallo is in the text. What I do is a check the subject for words that indicate that it is a purchase request, if it is not I will flag it. Second I look for words in the text that indicate product that I sell. If that is the case AND it is a purchase request (not flagged) it might be of interest to me and I copy it to a separate folder to look at. The original then gets moved to and other folder for future reference. Hope this helps. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Before playing any shot, a golfer must lock her eyes and mind into the smallest possible target. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good night Gerard, It was foretold that on 9-11-2002 19:48:09 GMT+0100 (which was 19:48:09 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G The first filter that looks for test in the subject should only G flag the email and leave it in the inbox. The second filter should G copy the msg to folder test when the word hallo is in the text. Here's another try Gerard lol: first filter looks for test in the subject, leaves it in the inbox and flags it. Second filter looks for hallo in the body, leaves it in the inbox but unflagged and copies it to the folder test. BeginFilter Name: test Active: 1 Source: \\Luc\Inbox Target: \\Luc\Inbox CopyFolder: none MainSet: 20test Actions: faFlag AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter BeginFilter Name: New test Active: 1 Source: \\Luc\Inbox Target: \\Luc\Inbox CopyFolder: \\Luc\test MainSet: 30hallo Actions: faCopyMsg,faoContinueProcessing,faoAdvNoFlagged AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter Although i'm still puzzled because you say that it is a purchase request, if it is not I will flag it. On the other hand you say that the second filter trigger if words in the text that indicate product that I sell. If that is the case AND it is a purchase request (not flagged). So, if it's not a purchase request it must be flagged (first filter) but the second filter you say a request (not flagged?). Sorry if it takes so much time but i'm curious myself to see if the filters will work or not :-) -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. Home is where you hang your Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good afternoon Gerard, It was foretold that on 5-11-2002 23:48:16 GMT+0100 (which was 23:48:16 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G As you can see from me explanation above I G get flagged and non flaged msg were I only wanted the Non-Flagged Indeed, strange behaviour. Could you post your filter so i can try it out? -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. To many, no doubt, he will seem blatant and bumptious, but we prefer to regard him as being simply British. - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) - Irish novelist, playwright and wit Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Friday, November 8, 2002, 5:46:42 PM, you wrote: L Indeed, strange behaviour. Could you post your filter so i can try it L out? Hi Luc, If you want to try it out, it might be better if you tried to set-up 2 similar filters and see if you can get the same behaviour. First filter set the flag if the subject matches Second filter copies the msg to a folder if a word in the body text is found. Thanks for your help -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Golfers must learn to quiet their minds, stay in the present, and focus tightly on the next shot to be played. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good evening Gerard, It was foretold that on 8-11-2002 20:17:10 GMT+0100 (which was 20:17:10 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G If you want to try it out, it might be better if you tried to G set-up 2 similar filters and see if you can get the same behaviour. Gerard, i fiddled a bit around (but i'm not sure any more if it's what you want lol) and came up with two filters: the first looks for test in the subject, flags it and puts it in the folder test. The second filter looks for hallo in the text, puts it in the folder test, then copies it in the folder new test. The message is not flagged is enabled. Is this what you want, because you stated copied. BeginFilter Name: test Active: 1 Source: \\Luc\Inbox Target: \\Luc\test CopyFolder: none MainSet: 20test Actions: faFlag AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter BeginFilter Name: New test Active: 1 Source: \\Luc\Inbox Target: \\Luc\test CopyFolder: \\Luc\test new MainSet: 30hallo Actions: faCopyMsg,faoContinueProcessing,faoAdvNoFlagged AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. Read my chips: No new upgrades! Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good night Gerard, It was foretold that on 8-11-2002 20:17:10 GMT+0100 (which was 20:17:10 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G If you want to try it out, it might be better if you tried to G set-up 2 similar filters and see if you can get the same behaviour. Gerard, i fiddled a bit around (but i'm not sure any more if it's what you want lol) and came up with two filters: the first looks for test in the subject, flags it and puts it in the folder test. The second filter looks for hallo in the text, puts it in the folder test, then copies it in the folder new test. The message is not flagged is enabled. Is this what you want, because you stated copied. BeginFilter Name: test Active: 1 Source: \\Luc\Inbox Target: \\Luc\test CopyFolder: none MainSet: 20test Actions: faFlag AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter BeginFilter Name: New test Active: 1 Source: \\Luc\Inbox Target: \\Luc\test CopyFolder: \\Luc\test new MainSet: 30hallo Actions: faCopyMsg,faoContinueProcessing,faoAdvNoFlagged AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. To exercise is human; not to is divine. - Robert Orben. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good evening Gerard, It was foretold that on 5-11-2002 08:52:24 GMT+0100 (which was 8:52:24 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G I am now wondering, based on your experience, that the flag might not G be seen if it is set by a filter and/or the filters are of the same group? Is it correct to assume that all those filters are in the incoming mail folder? And that you want the to be moved if not flagged and read? If that is right, i would make the filter that moves the unflagged messages in the read folder. I haven't tried it myself because i flag them manually. If i find the time today, i'll set my filters to flag them automatically and see if it works for me -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. He who can, does. He who cannot, teaches. (George Bernard Shaw) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good evening Luc, It was foretold that on 5-11-2002 18:20:45 GMT+0100 (which was 18:20:45 where I live) Luc would mumble: snipped a bit L If i find the time today, i'll set my filters to flag them L automatically and see if it works for me Just tried it out and it works for me. Here's what i did: i have a plain filter that looks for keywords and if matched, the messages are filtered to a specific folder. They also get automatically flagged. That filter i created in the incoming mail folder. From the messages that are thus filtered, i need those _with attachments_ filtered to another folder, _after_ they are read. What i did is set up a filter with keywords in the read folder. On the advanced tab i enabled message is not flagged message has attachments. Now what happens is this: the _unread_ messages are filtered to the appropriate folder and get flagged. After i read a message, i unflag it and, if it has an attachment, it gets filtered to the other folder, as soon as i move to the next message. The ones without attachment, stay in their folder. If i decide that i don't want to keep the message, i don't unflag it but delete it. Is this what you're looking for (albeit without the attachment thingie)? -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. It's been a rough day. I got up this morning ... put a shirt on and a button fell off. I picked up my briefcase, and the handle came off. I'm afraid to go to the bathroom. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Tuesday, November 5, 2002, 6:20:45 PM, you wrote: L Is it correct to assume that all those filters are in the incoming L mail folder? Yes L And that you want the to be moved if not flagged and read? It is a bit more complicated. I will list the filters for you: - Flag if subject contains XXX - If body contains XYZ and Not Flagged Then copy to folder Action1 - If body contains ABC and Not Flagged Then copy to folder Action2 - If sender = A1 move to folder Sender1 - If sender = A2 move to folder ... etc L If that is right, i would make the filter that moves the unflagged L messages in the read folder. I haven't tried it myself because i flag L them manually. I am not sure what you mean by read folder. I dont read all my mails :( I use TB! for my business and to help me wade through 2000 mails a day. L If i find the time today, i'll set my filters to flag L them automatically and see if it works for me Let me know how it went. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Golf is an awkward set of bodily contortions designed to produce a graceful result. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good evening Gerard, It was foretold that on 5-11-2002 19:05:58 GMT+0100 (which was 19:05:58 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G I am not sure what you mean by read folder. In the sorting office, there's a folder read messages. G I dont read all my mails :( I use TB! for my business and to help G me wade through 2000 mails a day. Ah, then we have our wires a bit crossed :-). Before we go over your filters: i assume they all need to be applied to the same message, where it depends on what's in the subject, body and sender? Or do the filters apply on separate messages? -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. I'm a try-sexual. I'll try anything once. - Samantha Jones (Kim Cattrall) - Sex the City (TV show) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Tuesday, November 5, 2002, 7:09:36 PM, you wrote: L Just tried it out and it works for me. Here's what i did: i have a L plain filter that looks for keywords and if matched, the messages are L filtered to a specific folder. They also get automatically flagged. L That filter i created in the incoming mail folder. From the messages L that are thus filtered, i need those _with attachments_ filtered to L another folder, _after_ they are read. What i did is set up a filter L with keywords in the read folder. On the advanced tab i enabled L message is not flagged message has attachments. L Now what happens is this: the _unread_ messages are filtered to the L appropriate folder and get flagged. After i read a message, i unflag L it and, if it has an attachment, it gets filtered to the other folder, L as soon as i move to the next message. The ones without attachment, L stay in their folder. If i decide that i don't want to keep the L message, i don't unflag it but delete it. L Is this what you're looking for (albeit without the attachment L thingie)? Luc, It is getting close. The problem is that I don't want to use a read filter, I want to do it in one go. But your results have given me some thought about possible option. I will work these out when I have time. I still believe this is a bug and that I filled the report on good grounds :) Thanks for your help. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Golfers must learn to quiet their minds, stay in the present, and focus tightly on the next shot to be played. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Tuesday, November 5, 2002, 7:41:29 PM, you wrote: L Ah, then we have our wires a bit crossed :-). L Before we go over your filters: i assume they all need to be applied to the L same message, where it depends on what's in the subject, body and L sender? Or do the filters apply on separate messages? No, these are all the same single message that gets processes in steps. The reason I do this is to speed things up. First they all go through the flagging filter and then all get checked against a number of body text filters. I could combine the flagging with the text but I still would need a flagging filter in the end to flag all the msg's that weren't filtered by the body text filters. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Courage is a necessary quality in all champions. But an athlete cannot be courageous without first being afraid. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good evening Gerard, It was foretold that on 5-11-2002 20:36:12 GMT+0100 (which was 20:36:12 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G No, these are all the same single message that gets processes in steps. What about this? If the subject meets your keyword, the message gets flagged. This will have as a result, that, when the next filter needs to look for the keywords in the body in the same message, that filter will not work because you tell it that the message has to be unflagged which can't be true because you just told it to flagg it. The not flagged condition will not work. Or am i misunderstanding something here? (i'm a bit dense today). Btw, this might be to obvious also but have you enabled continue processing with other folders on the Options tab? You have to enable this if you want TB! to continue processing the next filter once this filter has been triggered. Normally, if TB! finds a match it will stop the filtering process at that point. -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. I'm on a new tranquilizer diet. I haven't lost an ounce, but I don't care. - Bob Phillips. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Tuesday, November 5, 2002, 9:30:08 PM, you wrote: L Good evening Gerard, L It was foretold that on 5-11-2002 20:36:12 GMT+0100 (which was L 20:36:12 where I live) Gerard would mumble: L snipped a bit G No, these are all the same single message that gets processes in steps. L What about this? If the subject meets your keyword, the message gets L flagged. This will have as a result, that, when the next filter needs L to look for the keywords in the body in the same message, that filter L will not work because you tell it that the message has to be L unflagged which can't be true because you just told it to flagg it. Almost, after the flagging filter is a filter that looks in the body and if certain keywords are present moves the the msg to a folder. The onluy option next to the leywords if Not Flagged. The result is that ALL msg that match the text in the body get movedm the one's with and without the flag set. L The not flagged condition will not work. Or am i misunderstanding L something here? (i'm a bit dense today). Btw, this might be to L obvious also but have you enabled continue processing with other L folders on the Options tab? You have to enable this if you want L TB! to L continue processing the next filter once this filter has been L triggered. Normally, if TB! finds a match it will stop the L filtering process at that point. Yep, that on was to obvious. As you can see from me explanation above I get flagged and non flaged msg were I only wanted the Non-Flagged. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Golf humanizes women, humbles their laughty natures, tends, in short, to knock out of their systems a certain modicum of that superciliousness, that swank, which makes wooing a tough proposition for the diffident male.==P.G Wodehouse - THE ROUGH STUFF == Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good evening Gerard, It was foretold that on 1-11-2002 23:58:59 GMT+0100 (which was 23:58:59 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G I have filters using the message is not flagged functions but the G whole function doesn't seem to work. Does it work for you? Yep, works like a charm. Here's my filter: (personal items are replaced by BLA BLA) BeginFilter Name: BLA BLA Active: 1 Source: \\BLA\BLA Target: \\BLA\BLA\BLA CopyFolder: none MainSet: 40[BLA BLA]|[BLA BLA]|[BLA BLA] AltSet:1: 10[BLA BLA] | [BLA BLA] AltSet:2: 20[BLA BLA] | [BLA BLA] | [BLA BLA] AltSet:3: 30[BLA BLA] | [BLA BLA] | [BLA BLA]| [BLA BLA] AltSet:4: 00[BLA BLA] | [BLA BLA] AltSet:5: 40 [BLA BLA] | [BLA BLA] AltSet:6: 40[BLA] Actions: faoAdvNoFlagged,faoAdvIsAttach AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\Yahoo\Trash ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: BLA SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter This filter will move the message, if it is not flagged and if it has attachements. After unflagging and going to the next unread message, the unflagged message gets filtered. -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. Man is a clever animal who behaves like an imbecile. - Albert Schweitzer. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Monday, November 4, 2002, 9:54:13 PM, you wrote: L Yep, works like a charm. L Here's my filter: (personal items are replaced by BLA BLA) Hi Luc, How do you flag msg's? Iuse a filter for that, which comes before the filter that looks it it is flagged. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Golf humanizes women, humbles their laughty natures, tends, in short, to knock out of their systems a certain modicum of that superciliousness, that swank, which makes wooing a tough proposition for the diffident male.==P.G Wodehouse - THE ROUGH STUFF == Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good night Gerard, It was foretold that on 4-11-2002 23:47:03 GMT+0100 (which was 23:47:03 where I live) Gerard would mumble: snipped a bit G How do you flag msg's? I do it manually. Ctrl+G or clicking the little red dot besides the messages. What filter do you use? -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. A man may make many mistakes, but is not a failure until he starts blaming someone else for them. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Tuesday, November 5, 2002, 1:36:43 AM, you wrote: L I do it manually. Ctrl+G or clicking the little red dot besides the L messages. L What filter do you use? I use incoming mail filters. One of the first filters checks the Subject for keywords and set the flag if the keywords are found. Below that are a series of other filters that move mail to different folders. All of these filters should NOT move them if the flag is set by the first filter but Non of them do :( I am now wondering, based on your experience, that the flag might not be seen if it is set by a filter and/or the filters are of the same group? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Things That Sound Dirty At Golf But Aren't: You really whacked the hell out of that sucker Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
ON Friday, November 1, 2002, 10:07:55 PM, you wrote: L If, in your filter, on the advaced tab you enable message is not L flagged and then flag the message before reading and hit delete, it doesn't get L filtered. Hi Luc, I have filters using the message is not flagged functions but the whole function doesn't seem to work. Does it work for you? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= I know I am getting better at golf because I am hitting fewer spectators. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Delete filter bug?
Can't believe I hadn't noticed this before but this seems wrong to me: I have a folder set up with a read filter to transfer a message to another folder when read. If there's a single message in there and I delete it, it's gone and doesn't get moved. If there's multiple messages, then even though you delete a message it still ends up in the filter to folder. If there's three messages (as an example) and as I read them I delete them, the first two still end up in the filtered to folder, the last message will actually be deleted. Does that seem like a normal way it should work to anyone? -- ò.ó Nick Danger Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Hi Nick, On Friday, November 1, 2002 14:42 your local time, which was 12:42 my local time, Nick Danger [ND] wrote; ND If there's multiple messages, then even though you delete a message it ND still ends up in the filter to folder. If there's three messages (as ND an example) and as I read them I delete them, the first two still end ND up in the filtered to folder, the last message will actually be ND deleted. I used to use automatic read filters right from my inbox. Probably 75% of the ones I'd read, I'd want to delete rather than filter to the folder. Problem was, even though I was hitting the delete in the message, it was still getting forwarded to the folder, which wasn't what I wanted. Therefore, I've totally re-worked my filters and they are all manual and working as hot-keys using PowerPro. ND Does that seem like a normal way it should work to anyone? I don't believe that it should still filter a deleted message. Maybe it's just the order the system runs it in, but I would prefer it to only filter the massages that haven't been read and then deleted. This is just what happened in my situation and to be honest, I actually prefer the way I have it set-up now. Cheers, Chris. -- E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked by DrWeb. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good evening Chris, It was foretold that on 1-11-2002 12:54:43 GMT-0800 (which was 21:54:43 where I live) Chris Weaven would mumble: snipped a bit CW I used to use automatic read filters right from my inbox. Probably 75% CW of the ones I'd read, I'd want to delete rather than filter to the CW folder. Problem was, even though I was hitting the delete in the CW message, it was still getting forwarded to the folder, which wasn't what CW I wanted. If, in your filter, on the advaced tab you enable message is not flagged and then flag the message before reading and hit delete, it doesn't get filtered. -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900). Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Hi Luc, On Friday, November 1, 2002 22:07 your local time, which was 13:07 my local time, Luc [L] wrote; L snipped a bit CW I used to use automatic read filters right from my inbox. Probably 75% CW of the ones I'd read, I'd want to delete rather than filter to the CW folder. Problem was, even though I was hitting the delete in the CW message, it was still getting forwarded to the folder, which wasn't what CW I wanted. L If, in your filter, on the advaced tab you enable message is not L flagged and then flag the message before reading and hit delete, it doesn't get L filtered. But isn't that a work around? I don't know if I want to keep or delete the message until I've read it. If you flag the message it's not filtered correct? You then read the message and you want to keep it and therefore filter it, what happens? It's not filtered. Would you then have to manually remove the flag and manually re-filter the folder? I believe the correct way for this to work is for the read filter to check if you've deleted the message in some way, rather than just filtering it because you've read it. Maybe the filter kicks in as soon as you open the message, rather than when you close it? Overall, I'm not sure if there is a way to do what's required. I've worked a way which includes flagging, parking and running manual filters, but this is made quicker and easier using PowerPro. Unless anyone knows a better way, I'm happy with this. Chris. -- E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked by DrWeb. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Good night Chris, It was foretold that on 1-11-2002 14:57:33 GMT-0800 (which was 23:57:33 where I live) Chris Weaven would mumble: snipped a bit CW But isn't that a work around? I don't know if I want to keep or CW delete the message until I've read it. Here's how i do it: i first flag the message. Then i read it and if i want to keep it, i unflag it and move to the next message. The unflagged message gets automatically filtered to the specified folder. And so on. If the message (or the subject) is not of interest to me, i don't unflag it but delete it. -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. My mother used to say: the older you get, the better you get -unless you're a banana. - Rose, The Golden Girls. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete filter bug?
Hello Chris, On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:54:43 -0800 GMT (02/11/02, 03:54 +0700 GMT), Chris Weaven wrote: ND If there's multiple messages, then even though you delete a message it ND still ends up in the filter to folder. If there's three messages (as ND an example) and as I read them I delete them, the first two still end ND up in the filtered to folder, the last message will actually be ND deleted. I used to use automatic read filters right from my inbox. Probably 75% of the ones I'd read, I'd want to delete rather than filter to the folder. Problem was, even though I was hitting the delete in the message, it was still getting forwarded to the folder, which wasn't what I wanted. This sounds familiar. No, I haven't experienced this, but it was mentioned on one of the TB lists recently. ND Does that seem like a normal way it should work to anyone? No, I would call it an oversight (bug?) in the order in which the commands (delete and move) are executed. That everything works fine if you flag the message first, is another indicator that the order is hardcoded into the module. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The most precious thing we have is life. Yet it has absolutely no trade-in value. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta7 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html