Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2
I've used a 2 user licensed (NOT pe) UniVerse 10.1 on Gentoo, Redhat and SuSE 8.2 during my testing. As others have said, I've found it works just fine with just about any linux distro out there. I'm also betting that IBM would support it on most any of the mainstream distros as most of them are the same under the hood. You may have to tweak a couple of the startup scripts and make an adjustment or two to the install procedures, but after that it's all good. Currently, I'm running that very same 2 users license on a SuSE 8.2 system as a development tool. Granted, it's not servicing many users, but it has worked without incident for the past year. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2]: Epicor
My code has comments that don't always relate to the code. And I should probably step up the documentation to include the specific request itself. Or devise a more formal methad as Mr. Ellwood has done. But, where I work we are all at will employees. Fired at will or walk at will either way. I'm not too worried about loosing a job over some code changes that were misused. And I don't think that jail time is going to happen for a coder who makes a change that a CPA abuses. I should also point out that I have the benefit(!?!?) of working for a partnership that is not (yet) required to meet the SOX regulations. On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:59:34 -0800, Bill H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don: There are a number or current laws and regulations that attempt to rid public corporations of this kind of mismanagement. The result of these new regulations may not so much be the reduction of corporate financial and IT mismanagement, but the transfer of responsibility to lower level staff. :-( It may come to pass that you'll be held personally liable for someone else's indiscriminate business requirements. For those of us who think it is our role to provide others with the ability to trash the integrity of the organization's financial information; a rude awakening awaits! Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 9:15 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2]: Epicor Our resident Bean Counters have asked for and received several tools from me that will allow them to do the same thing to our system. It's our job to provide the sharp knives, the CPA types have to be carefull not to remove appendages with said tools. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UD: ODBC/OleDB access to selected records in a file
I've found the best way for me to do what you are describing is to use UniObjects .Net to create a recordset from the UniData/UniVerse machine and then pass that recordset into a Crystal Report. Probably not what you want to hear, but it is a method to stitch together your current programs with your spiffy new Crystal Reports. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] RE:
Installing a current version of UniVerse onto a Solaris box would be the quickest way to move the application. If your not familiar with UniVerse, you would be wise to invest in a few hours of consultant time for someone else to perform the upgrade for you. To move the data out of UniVerse to another platform you really need to know what's in the database and how it's structured. A few hours with a consultant might get you headed in the right direction. You may find that extracting only the subset of stuff your users are really interested in will be more cost effective than upgrading or converting the entire application. I don't do outside consulting, but I know there are a few on this list who do. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV migration
In addition to piqueing the interest of the IBM lawyers, using the PE addition in this manner may lead to an issue with large datasets. The PE edition just won't do large files. It's meant as a demo, tire kick tool. On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:35:34 -0500, Key Ally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert, PE is not for use in commercial ventures except for prototyping. - Chuck We Abuse It, We'll Loose It Barouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Me again... Another thought occurred to me. You were saying this wasn't getting used all that often anymore. I take it this is just more or less for reference from time to time. Would it be feasible to move the data to a PC? You'd have limited access to it. I know you mentioned they weren't likely to put money out to upgrade to a new version of UV. And with the costs of UV licenses, I can't say that I'd blame them. BUT, there is a UniVerse Personal Edition that may be the trick for you. It doesn't come with support, but you can find support other places (contractors, VARs, etc. - I actually do a little of that in the healthcare field where I came from on the side as time permits). The UV Personal Edition runs on a RedHat Linux and Windows. I think it allows 2 simultaneous connections to it. Link to IBM's UV site: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/u2/universe/ The PE version has been temporarily removed from the site, but it is possible to get a hold of them. I might still have a CD around, or may be able to get it. I'm dealing with UD more at the moment. Does this sound like something that may be of use? Robert --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV migration
Getting the data from unix to a pc running windows or linux can be done any number of ways. The basic receipe is copy, fnuxi, resize, recompile, run. You can use nfs, ftp, tape, rsync, samba shares, etc to get the data from one machine to another. The fnuxi part is a UniVerse command to convert the data format from one machine type and version to another. Using a 1-2 user developers license for UniVerse 10 and a pc running windows or linux would probably be the most cost effective solution if general lookup is all you want to do. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV migration
Sorry, I work for lawyers were throw money at it is S.O.P. Getting the data out of the old system and onto brand X database system does not require either a new UniVerse license or an install of PE. It would however go much easier with an install of a consultant type who could quickly show the folks what is in the system, where it's stored and the quickest and cheapest way to get it out of there. I guess the moral of this story is you ask a broad question, you get lots of broad answers. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Ascential?
Yes it is. This should prove interesting to watch over the next year or so. Hopefully our friends at Assential will remain employed or at least receive a large amount of stock options... Good Luck! On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:28:44 -0500, Gordon J Glorfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see that IBM is buying Ascential. Isn't that the company that broke away from VMark/Informix when IBM bought the U2 products? Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Applications Developer MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] Help with HELP
Grab a copy of the pdf's and use them. That's more readable than the help files. I'm lucky in that we have a few high speed printers here that can do double sided pages. Once printed that way, I have the pdf's bound into crude books. On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:26:25 -0600, Marilyn Hilb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In universe I usually edit the help file to read it. Tis so much easier to page down/up line by line , print etc. SYS.HELP and BASIC.HELP are the two files I know of that contain the help documents. (alto I am sb+ as well but I would think the help is at the universe level, not sb+.) Thanks, Marilyn A. Hilb Value Part, Inc Direct: 847-918-6099 Fax: 847-367-1892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.valuepart.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 6:53 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject:RE: [U2] [UV] Help with HELP There's a bug in a UV help routine, CHOICE.BOX.B. So help doesn't render properly if the screen is greater than 80 columns. Stuart. -Original Message- From: Barry Brevik Running UV 9.6.1.3 on NT. Terminal emulation is VP60 using wIntegrate. Does anyone know what term type the HELP command expects to see? I can sorta Any ideas for me? ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
Upgrade via replication sounds like a receipe for lots of wailing and knashing of teeth. Have a look at uvbackup and uvrestore. Or read up on rsync as a means to get the data from one machine to another. If it were me, I think I'd do a uvbackup to a network mounted filesystem (samba or nfs) and then do a uvrestore from that disk to the final location. Doing a test conversion would allow you to get an idea of how long it will take and should uncover any hidden gotchas in moving from Irix to Linux. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
Yes, going from Irix (MIPS?) to Linux on X86 will most likely require fnuxi to be run on everything after the transfer. Since the fnuxi process would run on the newer machine, it would probably still be much faster to run an rsync, then find - fnuxi script. Just be very carefull with rsync! It's a sharp knife. Flip around the systems and you could step on the live account with test data Do some testing with a couple of small directories until your comfortable with it. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Are you on the same physical network as the target machine? Is there a firewall between you and it? What is the reasoning behind changing the rpc port to 7200? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects quit working
I'm going through this right now. I changed my password on an HP-UX system and uniobjects stopped working for me. I created a test account and it works with that, it also works with the other users on the system. My original login still works with the new password. Sort of seems like uniobjects is caching something or getting lost in the pam files. On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:26:10 -0500, Gordon J Glorfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Group, On Friday out UniObjects was working away happily. Today we are getting the error 80011 (The login name provided is incorrect.). Over the weekend our esteemed changed our systems from NIS to Sun DS (LDAP) for user authentication. We are running UV 10.1.6 on Sun boxes. Has anyone else experienced this issue and what can be done to remedy it? TIA, Gordon Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Applications Developer MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Make sure the remote machine has the uniobjects port enabled and there are no firewalls between you and it that also block this port. On an HP-UX machine this is port 31438. Have a look at the services file in /etc and make sure this line is in there somewhere. uvrpc 31438/tcp # uvNet rpc port On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:49:04 -0500, Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask. I am trying to write a simple UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am getting the following error: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. Any ideas what I am missing? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Check the UniSession property HostPort. I believe that if you set it to match your host settings you should be OK. On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:46:52 -0500, Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our rpc port is set to 7200. Is there something I need to change within .NET to tell it to look for that port? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:08 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question Make sure the remote machine has the uniobjects port enabled and there are no firewalls between you and it that also block this port. On an HP-UX machine this is port 31438. Have a look at the services file in /etc and make sure this line is in there somewhere. uvrpc 31438/tcp # uvNet rpc port On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:49:04 -0500, Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask. I am trying to write a simple UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am getting the following error: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. Any ideas what I am missing? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
(this won't compile and is not meant to) Have a look in the UniObjects .Net pdf file for more info on this, but here's how you can change the port number used for the connection. public UniSession uSession; uSession.HostPort = 12345; uSession = UniObjects.OpenSession(Server, LoginName, PassWord, uvAccount, uvcs); On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:35:35 -0500, Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How exactly can I do this?. (I'm new to .NET). Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question Check the UniSession property HostPort. I believe that if you set it to match your host settings you should be OK. On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:46:52 -0500, Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our rpc port is set to 7200. Is there something I need to change within .NET to tell it to look for that port? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:08 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question Make sure the remote machine has the uniobjects port enabled and there are no firewalls between you and it that also block this port. On an HP-UX machine this is port 31438. Have a look at the services file in /etc and make sure this line is in there somewhere. uvrpc 31438/tcp # uvNet rpc port On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:49:04 -0500, Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask. I am trying to write a simple UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am getting the following error: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. Any ideas what I am missing? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Redback Startup
Or you can separate out the data layer from the presentation layer. Programmers - Respsonsible for Redback object properties (fields) and methods (databasic programs) REAL Web Designers - Responsible for website presentation. Redback allows web designers to be web designers and programmers, dba's, etc. to stay in their own little data world. My 2cents, Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12:23:18 PM 02/18/2005 [Snipped..]' As a minimum you will need to know: Database programming (UniBasic or UniVerse Basic) HTML Active Server Pages VBScript You will also need to be confident designing and building web sites. RedBack is an enabling tool, not a site builder. That means you need all the attendant page design, validation and navigation skills (CSS, JavaScript and so forth). You also need to be able to write fast, efficient database code. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Conversion to Windoze % vs ? character
You cannot use ? in a filename on Windoze (Same as *) that you may have used on Unix. I know my FTP client switches any * in filenames (record id in a directory file) to @ when I ftp from UNIX to Windows. Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1:46:26 PM 02/17/2005 I'm attempting to convert a system using a uvbackup tape from hpux to windows. I've noticed that many cataloged items now have a name that ends in the % character wheras on the production system they end in a ? character. Is there something I'm missing here as far as a conversion command or something? Since I used uvbackup and uvrestore, I'm thinking that doing a fnuxi is not required. Any ideas? Thanks, Don Kibbey Financial Systems Manager Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett Dunner LLP --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UniBasic CRLF over NFS mount
If you're using FTP to do the transfer from UNIX to DOS (which you say you are) then make the the FTP Transfer mode is ASCII, it usually defaults to BINARY (BIN). Most FTP clients will automatically convert CR to CRLF when transfering in ASCII mode. ASSIGN 1 to SYSTEM(1017) In Unidata the equivalent command for no conversion is NOCONVERT [ON | OFF] Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7:37:01 PM 02/09/2005 There should be a ux2dos or unix2dos program in the operating system you can use to convert cr to crlf. Example: cat foo.txt| ux2dos new.txt ; mv new.txt foo.txt You can execute this statement from your basic program etc... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Wed Feb 09 16:33:13 2005 Subject: [U2] UniBasic CRLF over NFS mount I'm building a flat file in UniBasic on a unix system, then writing it to an NFS mount point. The file attributes are interpreted as CRLF's when I ftp the file over to the windows system, but when I write or move the file over to the NFS mount, the attributes are only separated by unrecognizable characters (to notepad). The problem is, the version of the (BarTender) application I'm upgrading to, requires a CRLF before/after one of the attributes. Any suggestions/thoughts? TIA, Amy --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UD] Using Environmental Variables in VOC...
It works on UNIX, however, you could have a program get the environment variable and write out the voc with the path information. UDTBIN_PATH = GETENV(UDTBIN) SAVEDLOG_PATH = UDTBIN_PATH:saved_logs VOC.REC= DIR VOC.REC2 = SAVEDLOG_PATH VOC.REC3 = D_BP It would seem unnecessary, but hey it's Friday and I'm leaving for the beach (bar). Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3:30:06 PM 01/28/2005 How can I get this to work as I would like: I want to have a VOC entry called UDT_SAVED_LOGS 001: DIR 002: $UDTBIN\saved_logs 003: D_BP The Dict section doesn't matter, it just has to exist... And I would have thought the $UDTBIN would map correctly, but it does not (6.0.6, NT) -- Should it? Or is this one of those where each site would have to be hard-coded to the path?? My goal is an 'In-App' test of logs - things like Replication can die quietly..., and with no effect on the end user to warn them... I want to test the file for size and content and decide if I should raise a 'Red Alert' within the appication - I can hard code the path per site, but seems like enrvironmantals *should* work... David W. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UD] Using Environmental Variables in VOC...
For the benefit of the group (I emailed David offline). In windows it's the @ sign not $ sign for environment variables. ie. 002: @UDTBIN\saved_logs Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3:30:06 PM 01/28/2005 How can I get this to work as I would like: I want to have a VOC entry called UDT_SAVED_LOGS 001: DIR 002: $UDTBIN\saved_logs 003: D_BP The Dict section doesn't matter, it just has to exist... And I would have thought the $UDTBIN would map correctly, but it does not (6.0.6, NT) -- Should it? Or is this one of those where each site would have to be hard-coded to the path?? My goal is an 'In-App' test of logs - things like Replication can die quietly..., and with no effect on the end user to warn them... I want to test the file for size and content and decide if I should raise a 'Red Alert' within the appication - I can hard code the path per site, but seems like enrvironmantals *should* work... David W. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Where Will the .NET Apps Live ?
Java over .Net That just sounds wrong. If you have a server environment that's exclusively Unix, you will probably want to just stick with most anything except .Net. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 6:28 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [U2] Where Will the .NET Apps Live ? Is there a way to save .Net exe app programs on a Unix box... such that Windows users can launch these programs directly? A lecturer indicated how to save exe apps on a Windows Server. For us here, the trouble with this scheme is that it turns 2-tier into 3-tier. That is, if the Win Server goes down, clients would be unable to run their ERP programs. This scenario seems to make a compelling case for Java over .NET. Comments are welcome. --Bill --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
Sorry so late, it's been very busy here and I've turned off u2 list access
at work in order to cope... Here's a snippet of code form the very project
that is currently taking up all my time. The array logic was stolen right
out of the .net developers guide...
... This is just a section of code, this won't compile as
is...
string [] lRecIDArray ;
ArrayList lRecIDList = new ArrayList(2);
StringBuilder lStrValue = new StringBuilder();
UniDynArray uvTmp = uSession.CreateUniDynArray();
// select a file, here I'm just getting everything
uvsl.Select(uvfVENDOR);
// read the whole list into a unidynarray, I happen
to know this file is not very big so it's ok.
uvTmp = uvsl.ReadList();
// create array of Record IDs
for(int Index = 0; Index uvTmp.Dcount(); Index++)
{
string s = uvTmp.Extract(Index).ToString();
if (s.Length 0){
lRecIDList.Add(s);
}
}
// this is the part obtained from the manual.
lRecIDArray = new string[lRecIDList.Count];
lRecIDList.CopyTo(0,lRecIDArray,0,lRecIDList.Count);
// read records using array of record ids
// this part is fast, get all the stuff you want
right now
UniDataSet lSet =
uvfVENDOR.ReadRecords(lRecIDArray);
int iCnt = 0;
char uvVM = Convert.ToChar(253);
char SPACE = Convert.ToChar(32);
foreach (UniRecord uvVendor in lSet) {
uvTmp = uvVendor.Record;
// extract and process the data
string tmp = uvTmp.Extract(1).ToString();
// the rest is snipped...
endendend
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor St Clair
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I've had the same experience, using a select loop in a list runs very
slowly, and was planning to try this same approach. I tried to use ReadList
method of the Slist object as documented in the UniObjects manual, but
haven't gotten it to work yet. Did you use the ReadList or did you fill the
array by repeating listobject.Next()?
I'm still on UniObject 6, working with UniData 6. If I just do a
listobject.Select(fileobject) then it processes fast enough. But if I
execute a command to create a select list and then loop through it, the
performance gets progressively worse as the record count increases.
I'd appreciate any example you might be able share.
Thanks
Victor St. Clair
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donald Kibbey
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 4:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
I found that using a select list within a loop was cause for a long nap...
I fixed that by reading the entire list into an array and then looping
through the array. I've read on this list that there is an updated
uniobjects.dll available, but my VAR was not able to locate it?!?
I really don't understand why IBM does not just post the developers tools as
a public download. You really can't do much with them unless you already
have a licensed database so why the hassle?
Don Kibbey
Financial Systems Manager
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett Dunner LLP
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Uniobjects.NET writefield
Does the unifile method writefield actually work with uniobjects.net? I'm having a difficult time getting it to do anything other than cause my program to fault. I have vague recollections of someone posting about this before... Thanks, --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Uniobjects.NET speed/performance
Suppose I should have mentioned that my example was in c# using UniObjects .Net. I have been able to see that using the readlist method allows the program to run much faster, simply putting the select list into a loop and reading one record at a time runs noticeably slower. I didn't have this problem with the com based uniobjects or with the uniobjects for java library (even when I ran that under c# and .net). I've seen another post that referred to an updated dll, but when I tried to obtain it I was told by my var that it's not available. Now, I've also run up on a problem with writefield as it performs a consistent seg fault when used. I'm a bit perplexed by how UniObjects for .net was written. An example is with the writefield method itself. Instead of following the pattern laid out by UniObjects for Java, the programmer(s) chose to shuffle the order of the arguments to this method making it a nuisance to switch back and forth from one library to another. Not a big deal when your going to use only one environment, but still an oversight that could have easily been taken care of with a bit of attention to detail. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UD] Precision
Maybe they are paid semi-monthly (24 periods) rather than Bi-weekly (26 periods). -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3:52:25 PM 11/30/2004 52/2 = 26 paychecks ? 2 * 12 = 24 paychecks where the 2 missing paychecks ? This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UD] XML Parse/Open/ReadXMLData
I'm having a problem with creating an extraction file in Unidata 6.0.9 on HPUX 11.11i. It's not writting to the correct attribute as defined by the dictionary item named in field. Simple XML Doc(test.xml): root node1Node1/node1 node2Node2/node2 node3Node3/node3 /root - Extraction Record (text.ext) ?xml version=1.0? U2XML_extraction file_extraction start=/root dictionary=TEST.FILE null=EMPTY/ !-- UD.NODE3 is attribute 1 -- field_extraction field = UDNODE1 path = node1/text() / !-- UDNODE3 is attribute 3 -- field_extraction field = UDNODE3path = node3/text() / /U2XML_extraction - Test Program *$BASICTYPE U SUBROUTINE B.TEST.XML OPEN '','TEST.FILE' TO F.TF ELSE RETURN * XML.FNAME = _XML_/test.xml EXT.FNAME = _XML_/TEST.EXT * STATUS = PREPAREXML(XML.FNAME,F_XML) IF NOT(STATUS) THEN STATUS = OPENXMLDATA(F_XML,EXT.FNAME,D_XML) IF NOT(STATUS) THEN MOREDATA = 1 LOOP WHILE (MOREDATA=1) DO STATUS = READXMLDATA(D_XML,THIS.REC) IF NOT(STATUS) THEN WRITE THIS.REC ON F.TF,'DON.XML' MOREDATA = 0 END ELSE MOREDATA = 0 STOP 'XML ERROR' END END REPEAT * STATUS = CLOSEXMLDATA(D_XML) STATUS = RELEASEXML(F_XML) END ELSE PRINT 'OPENXML ERROR' END END ELSE PRINT 'PREPARE ERROR' END - Results of Test record (DON.XML) written to TEST.FILE: 1 node1 2 node3 - Unidata appears to just be writing the data out sequentially rather than using the attribute number in the dictionary item. Any ideas? Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] Initialization Error
The Not a typewriter is indictative of the a term type not being set correctly or blank. On all our unix cron jobs a wrapper functions sets these enviroment variables since cron only sets a few enviroments by default. Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:53:56 AM 11/19/2004 Wow. Have never seen this one. Though I am not certain how to resolve this, the error codes mean: 1: Unable to create a signature; the getid system call failed. 25: (ENOTTY) Not a typewriter. The file mentioned in an ioctl is not a terminal or one of the other devices to which these calls apply. Anyone have more? At 10:39 AM 11/19/2004, you wrote: I am receiving an error when trying to run a phantom: An error has occurred during uniVerse initialization Please contact the system administrator Error code: 1 25 I have not been able to find a listing of what the error codes translate to. Does anyone have an idea? Thanks, Bryan Haglund Haglund Consulting Inc. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV 10.1.2 ?
We upgraded to UV 10.1.2 while on AIX 4.3.3 and a week later upgraded to AIX 5.1 - we did not experience any problems with the AIX 4.3.3/UV 10.1.2 combination, though that's an admittedly short time. Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 7:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] UV 10.1.2 ? quote who=Michael Polak -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karl, We in the same boat, and looking to upgrade between Christmas and New Year. We are doing the Universe upgrade first, shaking that out for a while, then will upgrade AIX to 5.3. Lesson 1 from school or hard knocks Never do multiple upgrades at the same time unless you have to. Having worked for vars and having done literally hundreds of upgrades of both OS and DBMS, I agree whole heartedly. Let there be at least 2 weeks, after all the bugs are worked out, before doing the second upgrade. There is one major problem with this when one works for an organization that doesn't do regular upgrades: Sometimes one can't be upgraded without doing the other at the same time because of compatibility issues. Karl Mike - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 4:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] UV 10.1.2 ? Our server is running AIX 4.3.3 and I'm upgrading to 10.1.2. Is there any known gotchas with this combination that I should prepare for, or avoid by holding out for 10.1.4 or newer? Thanks, - -- Karl L. Pearson Director of IT, ATS Industrial Supply Direct: 801-978-4429 Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29 Fax: 801-972-3888 http://www.atsindustrial.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] - --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQY0BM7Ast3KQK8kYEQJuNwCeJPEw5uLXvUsM6Z4LqWKM7oaoa/4AoPCq oqgSJpExy6Pp0qA1yI9cXaio =OcWC -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- Karl L. Pearson Director of IT, ATS Industrial Supply Direct: 801-978-4429 Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29 Fax: 801-972-3888 http://www.atsindustrial.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ** Confidentiality: This message and any attachments are for the addressee only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this in error, please notify me immediately and permanently delete the message and any prints or other copies. Thank you. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Suspend.files
We have been using the suspend option as part of our back up plan, since we moved to UV 10.0.19 earlier this year, we are on AIX 5.2 ML3 at this time. Our back up process is scripted at the AIX level. We suspend UniVerse, then run sync several times, then break a 3rd set of mirrors, and unsuspend UniVerse. This process takes about 10 minutes to complete. We were using the AIX snap on and snap off commands, to take a snap shot of our system. However, IBM AIX has an issue with the snap logic, which can cause the system to hang - and the only way to get it back, is a hard reboot - which is not pretty. IBM AIX is working on this problem and with luck will have a fix in the next few weeks. Once they do, using the snap at AIX, only takes a minute or two and then UnVerse can be unsuspended. The back up then takes place on the snap area, once the back up is completed, you snap off and the snap area is removed. Once IBM has the snap correction in place, we will be moving to AIX 5.2 ML4, which is the version IBM is working on for the snap correction. It is my understanding that ML4 has other changes for UniVerse and for JFS2 file systems, which we are using. We are 24X7 and this has worked great for us (other than the snap issue). The users are able to continue to access the database for inquiry during the suspend, if they try to write, they will hang until the database is unsuspended. Our users know what time each night this will take place and know to not break out or reboot etc during this time. Hope this helps, feel free to drop me a note if you would like more information. Thanks and have a great day! Donald H. Cutting A. N. Deringer, Inc. D. B. A. / Systems Analyst Tel. (802) 524-8172 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.anderinger.com U.S. Customs Brokers, International Freight Forwarders, Warehousing -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Dodds Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Suspend.files Has anyone had any experience with using the SUSPEND.FILES command as a method of acquiring a clean backup of a UniVerse system. We are running UV 10.2.2 under AIX 5.2.2. Any insights would be appreciated. Tom Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] 630-235-2975 Cell 708-482-4510 Office --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] thoroughbred basic
Throughbred basic as far as I know isn't Pick. The last time I saw this was with a software package called Payplus. -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:27:22 AM 09/29/2004 Does anyone know the dbms this runs on Is it PICK based ? Bob __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Editors [TEXTPAD]
Speaking of Textpad. I use this. Does anyone have a syntax file for UD using Textpad? Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:25:09 PM 09/23/2004 From: djordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I occasionaly need to edit a type 1 file of around 30-50 megabytes. The problem is most editors want to load the file into memory before working on it. Does anyone know an editor that would handle big files like this Emacs can handle 128MB files out of the box. Bigger with some tweaking. http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki?EmacsFileSizeLimit Though you might have to buy more memory just to be able to run emacs :-) Textpad is a great windows editor (we have a site licence and install it on all systems). Claims to handle files up to the limits of virtual memory. I know I've edited some very large delimited files with it. It has nifty regular expression search and replace that makes stripping or adding funny characters easy. http://www.textpad.com/products/textpad/features.html Hth, Ian --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] RedBack # of responders configuration
A better resource may be: rbsolutions http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rbsolutions/ Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6:15:12 AM 09/24/2004 Hello there, I know this is the U2 mailing list and sorry for sending a RedBack related message but figured someone out there may have the answers. Recently, I've tweaked our production environment's rgwresp.ini to lower the # of responders (er UDT processes) eaten up by rgwsched. Is there any sort of rhyme or general rule behind defining a set number of responders and if so, what is it? TIA, Andy Pflueger Webmaster Ivy Hill Corp. Louisville, KY -- Sent using http://gmail.google.com/ :-P --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
OT: [U2] spammed
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12:08:42 PM 09/21/2004 -- It's illegal to send UBE (unsolicited bulk e-mail) here in the states, but that doesn't stop people from finding loopholes in the FCC regs or spoofing source addresses and IPs. If the post office didn't track where mail came from/went, you could put any return address on an envelope and no one would ever know it wasn't accurate. Heck, you might still be able to do that in some cities. *-- The US post office doesn't track the return address on US mail, it tracks which post office it was processed in. You can put *anything* as the return address on a piece of mail. Look at the anthrax, mail fraud, and other cases. Considering one of my US credit card companies preprints *their* address as the return address on my payment remittance envelopes is proof enough that it's not illegal, it's widespread. -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV Objects .Net slow
I had some issues with select lists. Found that if I read the entire select list into an uniarray and then processed it, things went much faster. Probably not a good idea for really large select lists, but then the stuff I'm working with should never be more than a few thousand (famous last words). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 7:53 PM To: U2 List Subject: [U2] UV Objects .Net slow Has anyone else had problems with the new .Net UV objects being slow? Especially with subroutine and execute. TIA, Kate Kate Stanton Walstan Systems Ltd 4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay Auckland, New Zealand Ph +61 9 360 5310 Fax +61 9 376 0750 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UVODBC first query
I know this happens even with TELNET on Window Servers. It has something do with the first time it looks up a username in the doman and then it caches the the user tree (probably wrong term) of all the users. So each login after than does NOT have to retrieve a list of users. Does that make sense? Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:44:18 AM 09/09/2004 We are using UVODBC to connect our web site to our production UV database and we also experience a FIRST CONNECT lag time. Subsequent queries are processed almost immediately. We have considered creating a routine on the server to periodically query UV so that any user would hopefully be the SECOND CONNECT. Garry Smith Dir. Info Systems Charles McMurray Company V# 559-292-5782 F# 559-346-6169 CONFIDENCE NOTICE: This is an e-mail message, theretofore may have many accompanying documents, and is truly for the intended recipient(s) and heretofore may contain data and information. Surely any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying could become arum nauseous. If you are not the intended recipient, please look deep within yourself by any means and immediately forgo digesting the original message. -Original Message- From: Andy Moore [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 3:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] UVODBC first query We are using a report writer called Bi/Query with Universe via the UVODBC and have noticed that once connected to the database, the first query has a delay of about 20 seconds before it returns any results. Further queries after this time run immediately without the delay, but leaving the session without activity for about 5-10 minutes means that the next query again has a 20 second delay before returning any results. We have noticed this on many of our customer sites, has anyone else experienced this delay with the UVODBC or aware of what may cause this or how to fix it? Thanks Andy Moore Selima Software Ltd Tel: 0114 2815000 Fax: 0114 281 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UV] Universe and AIX Upgrade sequence
Current: AIX 4.3.3Universe 9.5 Target:AIX 5.1 Universe 10.1.2 Since Universe 9.5 is not certified by IBM for AIX 5.1, we are planning to 1) upgrade to UV 10.1.2 while on AIX 4.3.3 (and possibly SB+ from 5.0.5 to 5.3.4) 2) upgrade to 5.1 on a subsequent week Is anyone aware of any traps in this sequence? (Most posts have referenced simultaneous upgrades) Don Bausili Blue Cross Blue Shield OK Confidentiality: This message and any attachments are for the addressee only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this in error, please notify me immediately and permanently delete the message and any prints or other copies. Thank you. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] FW: [UV] Universe and AIX Upgrade sequence
-Original Message- From: Bausili, Don Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:50 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [UV] Universe and AIX Upgrade sequence Current:AIX 4.3.3Universe 9.5 Target:AIX 5.1 Universe 10.1.2 Since Universe 9.5 is not certified by IBM for AIX 5.1, we are planning to 1) upgrade to UV 10.1.2 while on AIX 4.3.3 (and possibly SB+ from 5.0.5 to 5.3.4) 2) upgrade to 5.1 on a subsequent week Is anyone aware of any traps in this sequence? (Most posts have referenced simultaneous upgrades) Don Bausili Blue Cross Blue Shield OK Confidentiality: This message and any attachments are for the addressee only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this in error, please notify me immediately and permanently delete the message and any prints or other copies. Thank you. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Pyramid HR
It's HRPyramind. We have use this since 1998 for our core inhouse payroll about (200-600 employees) and we used it briefly for our PEO business but we sold that division off. I have nothing but praise for the software and the company and it's well supported. It's put out by a company FW Davison. Website: www.fwdco.com If you would like to discuss offline please email or call me directly at the numbers in my signature. Thanks, -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9:06:55 AM 08/05/2004 Has anyone worked on a package called Pyramid HR? It uses Unidata for its database. Any details would be appreciated. TIA Steve Kunzman Minneapolis, MN (612)750-3899 cellular --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
WebEX Recommendation was [U2] Univere Login Security
We use WebEx on our HPUX machines to allow HP techs in to help us with supporting our servers. I whole heartedly (sp.?) endorse it over netmeeting. -- Donald Verhagen Application Development Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210 Delray Beach, FL 33445 USA Voice Phone: 561.454.3592 Fax Phone: 561.454.3640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12:15:26 PM 08/04/2004 I recently had a sys admin try to get me to use webex instead of netmeeting. He said it works much better because it's browser based. www.webex.com says they are cross platform (HPUX, Linux etc). It's a full blown video-tel-white board conferencing application but from what I understand you could just use it as a telnet session. It's a web based version of Net Meeting which I've used as a virtual console. They offer a free-trial for 15 days, so if you are willing to be our guinea pig you can let us know if it works. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:45 PM To: u2-Users Subject: [U2] Univere Login Security Hi all, A buddy of mine wants me to be able to login to his computer on a routine basis to give him a hand with some development. Currently, he has a process that matches the ip address to the username and if it does not match, the user gets booted. The problem that I have is that my ip address is dynamic. Given the fact that this is a unix machine that I will be logging into, I assume that I cannot use a mac address or anything like that, Can someone out there give me a simple and effective solution for this? Thanks, Scott --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniDK
Don't let him/her near a live production environment. One small slip of the knife and you could be in big trouble. Beginners sometimes have a hard time getting their minds around multivalue fields. Could be an even bigger problem if they are using the java libraries and they forget to add the second or third variable to a field write. The write will succeed, but you'll have a data file that is way out of wack. If they want to learn that's good. Have them download and install the PE version of the product. Let them run their experiments on copies of the data and not the real thing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Pizer Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 6:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] UniDK I have a user who wants access to UniDK. Any particular reasons one way or the other? I do not know enough about the product myself but I know some of you do. :-) He is a beginning power user who wants to try to write pieces of a data warehouse in Java/C. Thanks!! - Bill Pizer 518-244-2087 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe Database Hang
We had this problem but it was related to Vertias Replication software. Are you by chance running Vertias on HPUX? Sorry deleted the original post if that had the OS info in it. Don Verhagen Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:56:10 AM 06/21/2004 Ang Suan Yong wrote: Do anyone having experience on Universe Database hang. ( note that existing user process still able to run the process and access the database only user which using new session log to the database will hang over there ? Not UniVerse, but UniData was doing that to us intermittently. Nobody new could log in, but users who were already in didn't experience any problems. I don't think we ever figured out what the issue was, but we moved up to UD6 and it hasn't happened again. -- Wendy Smoak Application Systems Analyst, Sr. ASU IA Information Resources Management --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [OT]Postscript to a Laser on Dumb Term Aux Port
I would go with the HP printers. The $99 dollar printer may be a windows only device that relies on the host cpu to do most of the processing. This could be more problematic than the spooler. We switched from pcl only printers to combos that are capable of both pcl and postscript a couple of years ago. We found that printing large volumes of pdf files to a pcl only printer was slower than if the same model printer had a postscript driver. We did not take the time to figure out exactly why, we just switched. (I work for lawyers who are just as impatient as furniture buyers :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Dzikiewicz Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 9:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [OT]Postscript to a Laser on Dumb Term Aux Port Much has been considered. These are retail cashiering station that we are talking about. One central printer would be my next choice. The only thing that can go wrong is that the printer hangs and the whole front counter is dead. When the printer runs out of paper, or toner or the drum, or what have you, they would panic, because the light would be blinking and they wouldnt know what to do (these guys really arent too bright and would always rather have the other guy fix the problem). It will lead to a situation where the printer gets disabled at the unix level and has to be enabled (easy for you and me, but a mountain for these guys). Mind you all this is happening in a retail environment with customers waiting for receipts (ever been in a supermarket when the receipt printer jams - what if that was one printer for the whole market). This isnt good. The spooler is the obstacle that Im trying to avoid. I started to think of the cheapest, easiest, uncomplicated way to go about doing this. This is to continue doing the same thing that has worked flawlessly for about 15 years. The reason for going to laser is to eliminate preprinted forms, which saves substantial cash. I originally believed that the $99 laser I had did postscript. If it did, I would be golden. It doesnt. It does do PCL4. So, my next avenue to explore is to convert the postscript to PLC4 or convert the PDF being created directly to PCL4. Currently, the preprinted forms/Epson arrangement is doing straight ascii printing. We have started using the Cross PDF package and we are converting everything to PDF. We are eliminating pre printed forms wherever they exist. If all of this ends up not working, then I will go with the spooled printer solution. Then I have to create a bunch of menu options to allow users to view the status of the spooler and printer - is lpd running, is the printer disabled, is there a lock file that needs to be cleaned up. I dont look forward to this. The dumb terminal cost about $350 w/kybd new. The laser Im considering is $99. The cheapest laser that does postscript (that I know of yet) is the hp 2100 about $400. Im open to anything that is completely simple and cheap. I have brought up the idea of thermal printers like they use in Best Buy, etc... nobody likes em. We are a furniture store and the appearance of this just doesnt fit considering the average ticket is about $1500 and some substantially more. The owner likes something a little more elegant. So, now you know a little more about the environment what do you think ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 5:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [OT]Postscript to a Laser on Dumb Term Aux Port Personally I'd recommend that you reconsider the architecture that you're trying to build, rather than reconsidering the specific devices that you're trying to fit into that architecture. I'm reading square pegs and round holes here. Dumb terminals were designed when we didn't have anything better. Do you really want to hang many laserjets around on dumb terminals that cost less than the printers themselves? Do each of your end-users really require exclusive access to a laserjet? And do you really need to manually generate a lot of PCL? I understand the needs of smaller sites and that it's not easy to drag new cables around for a new printer, etc. These days a wireless setup will cost as much as the $100 manual that someone proposed. And it's much easier to generate XML or HTML and export it as PDF, or use some other more text-based methods that result in high quality printed output. I'm just suggesting that you think outside of the box for a moment and consider something different than what the site already has, rather than just replacing old methods with new hardware. Good luck, Tony From Anthony Dzikiewicz I think you're right. I assumed that this is postscript printer. We have always used this with windows and could print postscript, but it is being converted. I guess I should start over with a real postscript
RE: [U2] UniBasic Performance Question
EQU V.SEC.SYNONYM TO COURSE.SECTIONS.REC.TABLEI.COURSE.SECTIONS,15 PRINT.VAR = V.SEC.SYNONYM verus PRINT.VAR = COURSE.SECTIONS.REC.TABLEI.COURSE.SECTIONS,15 I'm not sure but I think, in this case, elimating the EQUATE would be less keystrokes. Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4:03:24 PM 05/18/2004 Fawaz, No, it won't speed up your app. It will speed up your getting carpel tunnel syndrome. Equates are used for several purposes. In this case it looks as if they are being used to reduce the number of keystrokes the programmer will have to make. HTH, Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Applications Developer MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 [snip] I have a UniBasic program with hundreds of equate statements like EQU V.SEC.SYNONYM TO COURSE.SECTIONS.REC.TABLEI.COURSE.SECTIONS,15 and only thing they do is assign it to a PRINT.VAR PRINT.VAR = V.SEC.SYNONYM: :.. I am planning to take off the equate and assign the variable directly to the PRINT.VAR PRINT.VAR = COURSE.SECTIONS.REC.TABLEI.COURSE.SECTIONS,15: :.. Will this speed up the process? Since we are passing the information to .NET with XML tags, any improvement to the speed is desirable. [snip] This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UNCLASSIFIED RE: [U2] UniVerse telnet session terminating...
Mike, Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, this installation is still running Win2K and our problems continue. Weve reinstalled UniVerse, rebuilt the UV.LOGINS file via UVAdmin, created a brand new user and user group with the proper Log on Locally and Access this Computer from the Network policies set to no avail. The odd thing is that this problem appeared suddenly. Through 5:00pm on 4/30 all was fine and then the difficulties started. There were no system updates (at least no deliberate ones) and nothing recorded in the event logs coinciding with the problems onset. Still looking for a solution Don -Original Message- From: HENDERSON MICHAEL MR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:53 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: 'Don P. Nagai' Subject: UNCLASSIFIED RE: [U2] UniVerse telnet session terminating... Don, Win2K or Win2K3? If Win2K3, maybe the system believes that all licenses are used up. It used to give a sensible error message in this situation, but Win2K3 just remote closes the session. I have ECASE # 6484*AUS open on this raised 7/11/2003, qualified accepted by IBM 28/01/2004, reprioritised as Priority 3 on 13/02/2004. Do a uvlictool clean_lic -a at the ...\IBM\UV\bin DOS prompt and see if it fixes it. HTH Mike _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don P. Nagai Sent: Tuesday, 4 May 2004 12:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] UniVerse telnet session terminating... Hello All: We have a UniVerse 9.6.2.1 installation on W2K that has suddenly developed a logon problem for all users except the administrator. Were seeing the following error condition: Enter user name: test Enter password: Informix UniVerse telnet session terminating All standard users have home directories for valid user-accounts assigned through UV Admin and belong to groups with the Log on Locally policy in force. Only the administrator users are able to get past the password prompt (where they receive the Account name or path(xxx): question). The LIST.READU EVERY command shows no locks present. Any suggestions? Thank you. Don Nagai The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
