Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-26 Thread Bryancreer
Laurie Griffiths said - Muse uses ; to include fingering hints in ABC. i.e. a3;4 means play the a on the 4th string (probably at the 12th fret for guitar). Great idea. I might use this for cross fingering on English concertina and perhaps I could adapt it to indicate forked F on the oboe. I

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-26 Thread Simon Wascher
Hello, I use w: lines to include extra information with the notes and I use the guitar chord signs too (pos.1 is about the position of the crank and the numbers represent the fingers of the left hand 4=little 1=index). To use w: for the fingering makes sense for my purpose because normally

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-26 Thread Simon Wascher
Hello, Anselm Lingnau wrote: Bryan Creer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Great idea. I might use this for cross fingering on English concertina and perhaps I could adapt it to indicate forked F on the oboe. I expect lots of other people could come up with ideas for how to use it for their

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-26 Thread Laurie Griffiths
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 9:23 AM Subject: Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Laurie Griffiths said - Muse uses ; to include fingering hints in ABC. i.e. a3;4 means play the a on the 4th string (probably at the 12th fret for guitar). Great ide

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-26 Thread Richard Robinson
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Simon Wascher wrote: Anselm Lingnau wrote: That's right, but then when you receive an ABC file you need a way to figure out (...) We would probably need to put in a header saying %%fingering concertina or some such, and software might have the option of

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-24 Thread Laurie Griffiths
Subject: Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software Phil Taylor writes: | Laurie wrote: | | For consistency, terminate all the fields in the header with ! Line ends | are then logically optional, but omitting them should be deprecated (on the | grounds of readability for humans). | | It would have been

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-20 Thread Laurie Griffiths
Wendy said ...So even if we adopt the abc2win approach to staff termination (not a bad idea), we don't even start to solve the problems with line wrapping. But hang on. We're not trying to solve all the problems in the world. Just the problems in ABC line wrapping. So how about this:

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-20 Thread Bert Van Vreckem
Laurie Griffiths wrote: For consistency, terminate all the fields in the header with ! Line ends are then logically optional, but omitting them should be deprecated (on the grounds of readability for humans). snip X:23! T:Bang! K:C#! C#dim[^CEG_B^c]!! What about U:s=!D.S.! U:O=!coda!

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-20 Thread Phil Taylor
Laurie wrote: For consistency, terminate all the fields in the header with ! Line ends are then logically optional, but omitting them should be deprecated (on the grounds of readability for humans). It would have been nice to have something like this from the start, but introducing it now

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-20 Thread John Chambers
Phil Taylor writes: | Laurie wrote: | | For consistency, terminate all the fields in the header with ! Line ends | are then logically optional, but omitting them should be deprecated (on the | grounds of readability for humans). | | It would have been nice to have something like this from the

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-19 Thread Phil Taylor
Bryan Creer wrote: Yes, it is true that www.irishnet.com makes a bit of a pigs ear of the individually displayed tunes but I downloaded the whole collection and it only gave me one significant problem, an M: 6/8 command imbedded in the tune. There shouldn't be a space after the :. So

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-19 Thread Wendy Galovich
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 04:34, Frank Nordberg wrote: Do you mean poor John is supposed to offer free personal tutoring to anybody who wants to write ABC? John has given a lot of good advice on the subject both here at abcusers and on his web site, so I don't think you should criticize him

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-19 Thread Bryancreer
Frank Nordberg said - Hi Bryan - I had begun to wonder if you were on a vacation trip or something. Hi Frank- no, but after Phil Taylor's descent into puerile personal abuse and the subsequent failure of anyone else to tick him off for breach of etiquette I decided I'd had enough for a while

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-19 Thread Bryancreer
Phil Taylor says - Does ABCcheck report a space in the M: field as an error? No it doesn't. This is a specific problem to do with abc2win (so it will give you another stick to beat it with.) The problem was not with ABCcheck but with abc2nwc. abc2win allows inline commands just by plonking

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-19 Thread Bryancreer
Just to get this one out of the way... John Chambers says - This is presumably the source of his use of the term "hypocrisy". I've just done a quick check and I can't find the term "hypocrisy" in any posting of mine I've still got on file (and I don't tidy up very often). I didn't actually

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-19 Thread Atte André Jensen
On Monday 18 June 2001 12:19, Frank Nordberg wrote: Sorry Steve, your way behind modern times too. Fact is, we already have perfectly good (or so the ads say) ways to get computers to compose and play the music without any subjective and emotional human interference at all. Yeah, seems your

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-19 Thread Wendy Galovich
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 10:03, John Chambers wrote: The biggest single problem is the damage caused by email line wrapping. This isn't caused by any single program. It's a systemic problem caused by many of the email packages that have been released in recent years. This isn't

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-19 Thread Wendy Galovich
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 10:03, John Chambers wrote: The biggest single problem is the damage caused by email line wrapping. This isn't caused by any single program. It's a systemic problem caused by many of the email packages that have been released in recent years. This isn't

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-18 Thread Steve Mansfield
Richard Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Steve Mansfield wrote: But at the end of the day if your OS of choice supports the creation of ASCII characters in a file you've got all the tools you need to generate abc. Mmm. But the ability to do something with it is nice,

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software

2001-06-18 Thread Bryancreer
I had planned to watch this thread for a while before adding my thoughts but now there is so much to respond to that it's hard to know where to start so here are a few random hits - John Chambers said - Just a few days ago, I was asked why www.irishtunes.net isn't very well represented in

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-17 Thread Atte André Jensen
On Friday 15 June 2001 11:20, Phil Taylor wrote: I could equally claim that BarFly is the de facto standard on the grounds that it runs on the platform which is the de facto standard for music production I didn't know BarFly ran on Linux :-) -- Atte To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-17 Thread John Chambers
Atte writes: | On Friday 15 June 2001 11:20, Phil Taylor wrote: | I could equally claim that BarFly is the de facto standard on the grounds | that it runs on the platform which is the de facto standard for music | production | | I didn't know BarFly ran on Linux :-) Maybe it doesn't now, but

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-17 Thread Frank Nordberg
John Chambers wrote: One of my favorite test cases for music software is the tune at: http://ecf-guest.mit.edu/~jc/music/abc/Intl/tune/JovanoJovanke_D.abc http://ecf-guest.mit.edu/~jc/music/abc/Intl/tune/JovanoJovanke_E.abc Nice one :-) I made a quick Finale file out of the first one.

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-17 Thread John Chambers
Frank Nordberg writes: | John Chambers wrote: | One of my favorite test cases for music software is the tune at: | | http://ecf-guest.mit.edu/~jc/music/abc/Intl/tune/JovanoJovanke_D.abc | http://ecf-guest.mit.edu/~jc/music/abc/Intl/tune/JovanoJovanke_E.abc | | Nice one :-) Yeah; it's a

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-15 Thread Phil Taylor
I guess you must be an abc2win user then Gianni? As we both know - as anybody else on this list, for the matter! - ABC2WIN is de facto the standard as far as the abc notation is employed on the web, both as far as the mailing list and a number of the abc collections of tunes available for

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-15 Thread John Chambers
Phil Taylor writes: | I have over 10,000 tunes on my machine, downloaded from all over the web, | and less than 5% of them have exclamation marks at the ends of the lines. Some time ago, I had my tune finder's search bot tell me statistics about such things, and my numbers were about the

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-14 Thread Richard Robinson
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Jack Campin wrote: My understanding of the ab construct is that it is specially for hornpipes Your understanding is wrong. Hornpipes don't need any such notation. They are often written in even length notes with the context telling the user to swing them; in ABC,

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-14 Thread John Chambers
Richard Robinson wrote: | On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Jack Campin wrote: | My understanding of the ab construct is | that it is specially for hornpipes | | Your understanding is wrong. | | Hornpipes don't need any such notation. They are often written in even | length notes with the context

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-14 Thread Johnny Adams
Depending on the specific hornpipe, the ratio of a hornpipe's small notes can range from 3:2 to 3:1. A 2:1 ratio is the most common, of course, which is why some people say that hornpipes should be written in 12/8 or 12/16 rather than 4/4. It could be useful if a midi generator

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted:ABC transcription...])

2001-06-14 Thread Phil Taylor
John Chambers wrote: Of course, to be really useful, you'd need more information than is in the R line. I've thought occasionally that it might be interesting to start a discussion of something like a %%MIDI line that gives information about how to adjust the rhythm. Even with hornpipes,

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-14 Thread Gianni Cunich
On 13/06/01 at 0.20 John Chambers wrote: Gianni Cunich writes: | Sorry, but I actually got bored about the discussion about the abc2midi behaviour...so bored I actually felt sick! ... | The real problem, IMO, is a totally different one: is there anybody who actually cares about the respect

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-13 Thread James Allwright
On Tue 12 Jun 2001 at 09:29PM +0200, Gianni Cunich wrote: Sorry, but I actually got bored about the discussion about the abc2midi behaviour...so bored I actually felt sick! The problem about the way abc2midi handles the broken rythms shortcut is that it actually playes (and save as midi)

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-13 Thread Laura Conrad
James == James Allwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: James My understanding of the ab construct is that it is James specially for hornpipes and so you can use it for a 2:1 James ratio if that is what you want elsewhere. If you want 3:1, James then you can write a3/2b/2. The

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-13 Thread Wil Macaulay
I'm assuming your tongue is firmly in cheek here, but a couple of things are useful to mention: - traditional tunes are often notated differently than they are played. Hornpipes are a good example, since they can be written straight and played dotted (Note: I am not talking about abc, just about

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-13 Thread Richard Robinson
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, James Allwright wrote: I have to disagree strongly here. My understanding of the ab construct is that it is specially for hornpipes and so you can use it for a 2:1 ratio if that is what you want elsewhere. If you want 3:1, then you can write a3/2b/2. My understanding

[abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-12 Thread Gianni Cunich
Sorry, but I actually got bored about the discussion about the abc2midi behaviour...so bored I actually felt sick! The problem about the way abc2midi handles the broken rythms shortcut is that it actually playes (and save as midi) any beat using the symbol as a triplet, even if in the R:

Re: [abcusers] abc compliant software (was:midi2abc [was: Wanted: ABC transcription...])

2001-06-12 Thread John Chambers
Gianni Cunich writes: | Sorry, but I actually got bored about the discussion about the abc2midi |behaviour...so bored I actually felt sick! ... | The real problem, IMO, is a totally different one: is there anybody who actually |cares about the respect of the standard anymore? | | I assume the