On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:07 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> - I like the Focuses idea.
> - I think you'd really just want to use your Stamps to win rather than
> anything else. Maybe instead you can only Focus on something if you have
> the right Stamp or combination of Stamps
I do agree with that Officers should be rewarded somehow, but my main issue
here is how the democracy is run, not Officer rewards.
Maybe we could keep those rewards somehow without any nerfs while limiting
or nerfing other things?
I've attempted a "Officer salary" proto, anyways.
I'm also sorry
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:49 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:46 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On 5/19/23 16:40, Forest Sweeney wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discus
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:46 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/23 16:40, Forest Sweeney wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 5/19/23 16:16, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
On 5/19/23 16:40, Forest Sweeney wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 5/19/23 16:16, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > I consent to all rice plans that have my player in the Rice Up
> list and do
> > not have my player
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I'd argue that I fit criteria 4 of Rule 2519 ("Consent"):
> "4. it is reasonably clear from context that e wanted the action to
> take place or assented to it taking place."
There's quite a few precedents in dif
*Blows smoke off gun, spins pistol back into holster*
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:42 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I think it
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I think it could, because I believe they are providing context which
> reasonably indicates that they want their consent to be applied in that
> way. The 4st point in Rule 2519 seems t
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/23 16:16, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > I consent to all rice plans that have my player in the Rice Up list and
> do
> > not have my player in the Rice Down list. I al
I think it could, because I believe they are providing context which
reasonably indicates that they want their consent to be applied in that
way. The 4st point in Rule 2519 seems to allow it.
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:31 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:47 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> So, only someone who already is in power and a beneficiary of the system
> should be entitled to propose change things?
Er, I never said you couldn't propose. I was giving you feedback on
how I felt about voting for
On 5/19/23 16:16, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> I consent to all rice plans that have my player in the Rice Up list and do
> not have my player in the Rice Down list. I also consent to all rice plans
> that have no players in the Rice Up list and I am not in the Rice Down list.
>
> (Co
I made a better consent notification anyhow, but thanks for looking out for
me! (I noticed my failure to use the right fora as well... such a 4st thing
to do!)
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 1:18 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/23 16:11, Forest Swee
On 5/19/23 14:21, Beokirby via agora-discussion wrote:
On 2023-05-18 10:56 PM, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
On 2023-05-18 10:41 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
ID Author(s) AI Title
---
On 5/19/23 15:21, Beokirby via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2023-05-18 10:56 PM, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
>> On 2023-05-18 10:41 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
>>> ID Author(s) AI Title
>>> -
On 5/19/23 16:11, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:57 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 5/19/23 14:56, juan via agora-business wrote:
>>> I create and consent to the following Rice Plan:
>>>
>>> Rice Up: []
>>>
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:57 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/19/23 14:56, juan via agora-business wrote:
> > I create and consent to the following Rice Plan:
> >
> > Rice Up: []
> > Rice Down: []
> >
>
> I consent to the above rice plan.
>
> --
> Ja
- I like the Focuses idea.
- I think you'd really just want to use your Stamps to win rather than
anything else. Maybe instead you can only Focus on something if you have
the right Stamp or combination of Stamps in your possession? For example,
something like: Voting Focus [Requirement: Ownership o
On 2023-05-18 10:56 PM, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
On 2023-05-18 10:41 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
ID Author(s) AI Title
---
8980~ Yachay 1.0 Riding with trai
You could say that to anyone disadvantaged who wants to change how things
are, it's not particularly insightful (or accurate, in this case).
So, only someone who already is in power and a beneficiary of the system
should be entitled to propose change things?
I don't think my situation is as bad,
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:41 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 5/19/23 12:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote
> >> 8978* Janet 3.0 Authorized initiation
> > FOR, although it doesn't actually solve the issue that brought this
> > up, as it doesn't ratify a
On 2023-05-19 1:38 PM, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
There's danger in a contract like this. If you have 0 Rice, and say, I have
1 Rice, and I submit a Rice Plan that gives us both 1 Rice and it ends up
being the Rice Plan that passes, then you lose that round and I win that
round,
On 5/19/23 12:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote
>> 8978* Janet 3.0 Authorized initiation
> FOR, although it doesn't actually solve the issue that brought this
> up, as it doesn't ratify a *proposal's* existence when the decision is
> to adopt a proposal (the equivalent
There's danger in a contract like this. If you have 0 Rice, and say, I have
1 Rice, and I submit a Rice Plan that gives us both 1 Rice and it ends up
being the Rice Plan that passes, then you lose that round and I win that
round, and we're both set back to 0 Rice.
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 7:21 PM B
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > I sometimes feel like half my arguing at Agora is dedicated to trying
> > to persuade people not to repeal the economy.
> >
> > It rarely works, an
On 5/19/23 11:50, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
I'd much rather take the route of trying to get the Radiance/Stamps
system functional again, than of trying to repeal it. (Stamps in
particular are one of the most powerful "new player perks" we've seen,
and I suspect that that's a good thing.)
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> > discussion wrote:
> > > With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I be
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> > discussion wrote:
> > > With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I be
Technically you need to "consent" to having your "Signature" on a "Rice
Plan", but given how lenient consent rules are (Rule 2519, point 4
especially), I believe this and the others like it are fine. It just needs
to be "reasonably clear from context".
I think it's a great advantage that the conse
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> discussion wrote:
> > With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I believe that your
> > Officer salary problem is part of a larger problem of Agora
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> I don't intend to design an economy, because I don't think I'm competent
> enough to do so. I'll try to contribute where I can, though.
>
Ah, the typical take-away power with a promise, but an unfulfilled
one. No wo
On 2023-05-19 1:33 AM, Katie Davenport via agora-business wrote:
I create and consent to the following rice plan.
[
Rice Up: [inalienableWright, beokirby, blob]
Rice Down: [ ]
]
-inalienableWright (Katie)
I consent to this list
I don't intend to design an economy, because I don't think I'm competent
enough to do so. I'll try to contribute where I can, though.
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 6:40 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via a
Most newer players aren't going to know how to navigate the game and
competently use mechanics like Stones or Dreams (I still don't know how
Stones are meant to work). And even then, there's an opportunity cost in it
all. A player that already is well-off can afford to use their Dream for
things ot
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I believe that your
> Officer salary problem is part of a larger problem of Agora overall needing
> a proper economy again, not a voting strength problem.
So offer t
On 5/19/23 11:26, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
But, no. I don't think that any player deserves ~4 times the voting
strength of a newbie, regardless of the reason. I want other players to be
able to play nomic, especially newbies, and they need a relevant amount of
voting strength
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:28 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:51 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > > Let's give everyone a more equal chance to be relevant.
> > >
>
> So right now, Officers' only reward
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:51 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> > Let's give everyone a more equal chance to be relevant.
> >
So right now, Officers' only reward is increased voting strength (I
believe), and the game is growing with lots of new players so
officers' work is getting
On 5/19/23 03:45, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
8981~ Janet, nix 2.0 Stone fixes
PRESENT for now, I haven't studied those rules yet
Well, the gist of the intended change is that some of the stones say
their own name in their effects, when it'd be better to say "thi
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 2:08 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following two Proposals:
>
> Title: Democratization (low AI version)
> AI: 1
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
> /*Comment: I'm fine with rewarding officers and such with mo
On 5/19/23 00:57, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:55 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I create and consent to each of the following rice plans:
>>
>> 1. As follows:
>>
>> * Rice Up: The empty set.
>>
>> * Rice Down
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:55 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I create and consent to each of the following rice plans:
>
> 1. As follows:
>
> * Rice Up: The empty set.
>
> * Rice Down: The empty set.
>
> 2. As follows:
>
> * Rice Up: The set of active pl
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 9:56 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 21:41, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
> > ID Author(s) AITitle
> >
> ---
> > 8980~ Ya
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest Sweeney
wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 5:08 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:57 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>> > On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> > > --
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 5:08 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:57 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > > --
> > > H. ais523, Champion×17, M.N., D.N.Phil, Marvy Scamster
>
On 5/18/23 16:29, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> Welcome to another episode of me being paranoid about the same enactment
> timing scam again.
>
> I announce my intent to deputise as Assessor to resolve the Agoran
> decisions to adopt Proposals 8965, 8966, 8967, 8968, 8969 and 8970.
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:57 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > --
> > H. ais523, Champion×17, M.N., D.N.Phil, Marvy Scamster
>
> Appreciate the little humble brag in the signature :p
A portion of that was the result of scams, and scams
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:49 -0500, blob via agora-discussion wrote:
> I, being the new player, totally agree with this. I would be more than
> willing to put some sort of marker in front of my name, as others in the
> past have done. How should I go about changing my name--or how have others
> in t
On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> --
> H. ais523, Champion×17, M.N., D.N.Phil, Marvy Scamster
Appreciate the little humble brag in the signature :p
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:36 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:44 AM juan via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> Note that the "free choice" is qualified by the need to "pick em out
> in the full range of Agoran contexts". The S
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 2:29 PM ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Or perhaps this is just a case of "the ais523 who has been following
> Agora for over 15 years spots things that the ais523 who had been there
> for only one year didn't".
Lol, I meant to add myself that the rules underlying may
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > That said, I suspect the word in R2029 is currently undefined: I don't
> > think "a definition that was in place at the time the rule was adopted"
>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2023-05-18 13:16]:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:51 PM nix via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > > CFJ: This violates Rule 2029 ("Town Fountain").
> > > I note and investigate the infraction to be 2 blots.
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> that it may fail is enough disclaimer to avoid no faking. I'll also
> note that Jane
On 5/18/23 16:08, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
>> violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
> Sufficient carefulness would be not inves
On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
Sufficient carefulness would be not investigating until the CFJ was
resolved, or your timer was al
I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:52 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> >
On 5/18/23 14:51, nix via agora-business wrote:
On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
CFJ: This violates Rule 2029 ("Town Fountain").
I note and investigate the infraction to be 2 blots. (and as we know,
this
investigation only occurs if it does indeed violate the rule).
On 5/18/23 14:16, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I think this will fail but, I think it could be interesting regardless to
have an unofficial (or official) record of the methods for how each win was
achieved.
That's not what I would use titles for. That would be better suited for
b
I think this will fail but, I think it could be interesting regardless to
have an unofficial (or official) record of the methods for how each win was
achieved.
On Thursday, May 18, 2023, nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:06, Forest Sweeney via agora-of
Just to advertise myself a bit here, these kind of situations is what my
Invocation Proposal is trying to alleviate.
On Thursday, May 18, 2023, nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:06, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
>
>> I intent to clean Rule 267
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:07 PM Beokirby via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intent to clean Rule 2675 ("Dream Wandering") by replacing " ore "
> with " or "
> Sorry for the trouble.
>
> -Beokirby
>
>
Don't be sorry I'm like HERE for this Drama! :D
:P
--
4st
Referee
Un
There's actually two criteria to think about here. One is the
criteria for intent announcements (R1728). but the other is the
criteria for rule change specifications in R105, specifically:
> A rule change is wholly prevented from taking effect unless its
> full text was published, along
On 5/18/23 14:06, Beokirby via agora-business wrote:
I intent to clean Rule 2675 ("Dream Wandering") by replacing " ore "
with " or "
Sorry for the trouble.
No trouble at all! The rules will always have some level of learning
curve, but it's also incumbent on the more experienced players to thi
I don't think that "re-submission" or "editting" intents are a thing but
the language seems to refer to just one single possible outcome, even if
its not worded precisely.
I want this to be good enough to work, but I'm not sure if CfJs are on my
side on this.
On Thursday, May 18, 2023, beokirby a
On 5/18/23 13:45, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
Maybe we could use a metaphor or just something similar and illustrative?
"A player may begin to Chant for a particular action (...) When a player
has been Chanting for (...)"
"Chant", "Spellcast" or "Summon"; perhaps. Fantasy-theme
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:22 AM ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 11:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > hehe we can still fool old players sometimes - "intend" has a
> > "specific meaning" for registration as well as for other contexts, so
> > beokirby
On 5/18/23 14:44, beokirby agora via agora-discussion wrote:
> I re-submit my intent but edited to be replacing " ore " with " or "
>
> -Beokirby
First, this was sent to DIS (agora-discussion), so it doesn't work as an
action.
Second, the communication standard for intents is extremely high, so
Maybe we could use a metaphor or just something similar and illustrative?
"A player may begin to Chant for a particular action (...) When a player
has been Chanting for (...)"
"Chant", "Spellcast" or "Summon"; perhaps. Fantasy-themed things for
'charging up' to do something. Could be any other th
I re-submit my intent but edited to be replacing " ore " with " or "
-Beokirby
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 2:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:36, beokirby agora via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to clean Rule 2675 ("Dream of Wandering")
Suggestion: match more text:
EG "16 ore" to "16 or"
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:38 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:36, beokirby agora via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to clean Rule 2675 ("Dream of Wandering") by replacing "ore"
> with
There's a bit of a discussion on Discord right now, that "intend" (or
synonyms like "plan") have an implication of "doing in future, not
now" in many contexts, which adds to the confusion for registration -
and has specifically called out in the past in terms of "consent now"
versus "consent later"
On 5/18/23 13:32, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
Hm. We should probably use different words for registration "intents" and
tabled "intents".
In fact, I think it could be good to keyword things in the ruleset, sort of
like how MTG and plenty of other games do it, like; [Lifesteal] o
Hm. We should probably use different words for registration "intents" and
tabled "intents".
In fact, I think it could be good to keyword things in the ruleset, sort of
like how MTG and plenty of other games do it, like; [Lifesteal] or [Flash].
I believe we already have something like it in "Mother
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 11:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> hehe we can still fool old players sometimes - "intend" has a
> "specific meaning" for registration as well as for other contexts, so
> beokirby registered exactly as per the rules:
>
> > An Unregistered person CAN (
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:09 AM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 5/18/23 13:06, beokirby agora via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to register as a player of Agora.
> > My name is beokirby.
> >
> > I will then grant myself a welcome package and envision a dream of gardens
> Welcome beoki
On 5/18/23 13:06, beokirby agora via agora-business wrote:
I intend to register as a player of Agora.
My name is beokirby.
I will then grant myself a welcome package and envision a dream of gardens
Welcome beokirby! Keep in mind that phrases like "I intend" actually
have a specific meaning in A
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:44 AM juan via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-17 23:21]:
> > On 5/17/23 20:13, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > > On 5/17/23 19:10, Christian Arguinzoni via agora-business wrote:
> > >> I would like to register for the nomic game Ago
On 5/18/23 06:44, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
I think this is kind of rude… People are free to choose their own names,
at least in Agora, and I believe its an important principle.
The problem seems to stem from the way the rules define persons regardless
of their interactions with game stat
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 19:13 -0500, nix via agora-business wrote:
> On 5/17/23 19:10, Christian Arguinzoni via agora-business wrote:
> > I would like to register for the nomic game Agora. My preferred name is
> > blob. Thank you!
>
> Welcome! I grant blob a Welcome Package. This is interesting beca
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-17 23:21]:
> On 5/17/23 20:13, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > On 5/17/23 19:10, Christian Arguinzoni via agora-business wrote:
> >> I would like to register for the nomic game Agora. My preferred name is
> >> blob. Thank you!
> > Welcome! I grant blob a W
On 5/17/23 20:13, nix via agora-business wrote:
> On 5/17/23 19:10, Christian Arguinzoni via agora-business wrote:
>> I would like to register for the nomic game Agora. My preferred name is
>> blob. Thank you!
> Welcome! I grant blob a Welcome Package. This is interesting because
> this might be th
On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 19:28 -0400, Katie Davenport via agora-business
wrote:
> I intend to:
>
> Enter the current tournament of Commune as a participant.
>
> Set my (Left, Middle, Right) constructors to construct (7, B, D),
> respectively.
>
> Invest in Olive.
This is a little ambiguous, becau
On 5/16/23 04:18, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
>
>> On May 16, 2023, at 12:55 AM, Janet Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/16/23 00:41, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
The above judgement goes against game custom, common sense, and the best
interests of the g
On 5/16/23 14:49, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> @Herald: I recommend removing G and Janet from the review board. It has
> been more than a week, and only Yachay has done the review.
Both have assured me (on Discord) that they will have their responses
out in the next 48ish hours, so
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 1:28 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/16/23 15:27, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > On 4/30/23 18:45, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
> >> I intend to award Golden Glove to snail.
> > I intend with 2 Agoran Consent to award t
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:33 AM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/3/23 18:00, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > I submit the following horribly long thesis specifically to qualify for a
> > degree
> My office has received another degree. I will be usin
Katie Davenport via agora-business [2023-05-16 13:13]:
> Consider this my statement of intent to register as a player of Agora!
> Excited to get started!
>
> -Katie Davenport (inalienableWright)
Welcome inalienableWright! You are registered.
--
juan
Registrar
On 5/15/23 10:19, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> 8976* Janet 3.0 Ruleset convergance
> Conditional: FOR if Janet has intended to RWO the ruleset in the last
> week, otherwise AGAINST.
RWO cannot make changes to rules.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 6:03 PM Edward Murphy via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I pay 8 stamps (of types ais523, juan, Madrid, Murphy, nix, R. Lee,
> snail, and Yachay) to gain (8^2)-8 = 56 radiance.
>
> I pay 5 Murphy stamps to gain (5-1)*2 = 8 radiance.
>
> I have 37 +
snail wrote:
I wield the radiance stone. (Woah! So cool!)
(Wait! Oh my gosh! it's)
I reach for the Recursion stone.
(with a steel chair)
As $DEITY is my witness, that rule is broken in half!
The "investigator", "investigation" names are pretty misleading. Maybe it
could be reworded to something like "umpire", "assignation", etc?
I might draft something later
On Sunday, May 14, 2023, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/13/23 15:47, juan vi
On 5/13/23 15:47, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-12 18:51]:
>> In Agora, the rules are clear. The clock starts running when the
>> infraction actually occurred, not when it was discovered or reasonably
>> could have been discovered.
> I'd argue this is a
It's helpful for me, as a player, who is particularly invested in Proposals.
On Saturday, May 13, 2023, juan via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> secretsnail9 via agora-official [2023-05-13 05:07]:
> > PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
>
> I vote as follows.
>
> > 8972*
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-12 18:51]:
> In Agora, the rules are clear. The clock starts running when the
> infraction actually occurred, not when it was discovered or reasonably
> could have been discovered.
I'd argue this is a problem. If the investigation is to determine if there
w
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:17 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Also why is radiance at power 1.5 in the first place?
>
Was a minor design choice: because (in drafting points) I thought the
win condition itself (100+ points) should be a trifle more protected
than the award conditions.
On 5/13/23 06:13, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
>> 8974~ Janet 1.0 Plan B
>>
> AGAINST (Radiance gameplay is pretty much all we have, also this wouldn't
> even remove radiance (power 1.5). I'd rather see a fix or replacement
> instead of a repeal, and my draft should
On 5/12/23 18:15, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2023-05-12 09:32]:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 8:59 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>> So a question to you: if an investigator, with good and honest intent
>> doesn't believe that a crime has
701 - 800 of 8682 matches
Mail list logo
