Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
Ron Olsen;176009 Wrote: And some more words of wisdom about what's important in sound quality: http://www.biline.ca/critic1.htm This way of looking at everything in black and white (good guys vs. bad guys) is indicative of some kind of condition. Perhaps AS, which, of course, has a large

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] plug and play linear supply (part 2)

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;175930 Wrote: That's a good point - that hadn't occurred to me. EMI in the range from 20kHz - 40kHz would be inaudible added to the analogue output, but jitter at that frequency could intermodulate with the digital signal to produce audible distortion. For example 25kHz jitter

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 Classical FLAC 96k/24b

2007-01-31 Thread MrStan
Yes I have the original release of the Norrington and it is very good. I have my doubts about these so-called hi-def transfers. They don't seem to be using original Master tapes as the owner states he is trying to get Studio Masters for the future. In particular the excerpt of the Saint-Saens

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread ceejay
But surely all of us that hang out on this and other similar fora are by definition displaying AS tendencies? It would certainly explain some of the exchanges here... Ceejay -- ceejay ceejay's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread jmourik
Well, at least, in typical American fashion, it will give us something else but ourselves to blame for our behaviour. I like this one too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_virus ceejay;176086 Wrote: But surely all of us that hang out on this and other similar fora are by definition

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Buffering on the SB3

2007-01-31 Thread ezkcdude
Listener;176010 Wrote: About 24 years ago, I worked with a guy who often referred to something insignificant as mouse nuts. I never understood whether it referred to the mouse's food or his anatomy. Do you know? This unanswered question has stayed with me for all those years. Bill I

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] plug and play linear supply (part 2)

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
P Floding;176058 Wrote: Re-reading your post I have to wonder what the 40kHz limit comes from? There is no hard limit to what HF can be down-mixed into the audio-band by way of modulating the DAC clock. (There may be actual limits for each particular design depending on the circuit

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Digital Coax - EH???

2007-01-31 Thread sfraser
mikeruss;170977 Wrote: Nice reply ;-) I will take your advice Regarding Fibre and the internet - the reason it appears to be flawless is a thing called TCP, checksums etc (I.E error correction) not a good comparison. If you interested:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
jmourik;176106 Wrote: Well, at least, in typical American fashion, it will give us something else but ourselves to blame for our behaviour. I like this one too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_virus Slim Devices Rules! Everybody else drools!!! jan Well, recent research points to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
jmourik;176106 Wrote: Well, at least, in typical American fashion, it will give us something else but ourselves to blame for our behaviour. I like this one too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_virus Interesting idea... way OT, but there's a principle (maybe that's too strong a word)

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread tomjtx
jmourik;176106 Wrote: Well, at least, in typical American fashion, it will give us something else but ourselves to blame for our behaviour. I like this one too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_virus Slim Devices Rules! Everybody else drools!!! jan jan, you should amend American

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] plug and play linear supply (part 2)

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;176120 Wrote: The jitter will produce sidebands at x+-y, as I said above. So if the jitter is at a frequency x 40kHz, we need y 20kHz to make x-y audible. At least for CD audio (44.1kHz sampling rate) this can't happen. I'm sure 80kHz will fold right down into the audible

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] plug and play linear supply (part 2)

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
Well, here's a quote from http://stereophile.com/reference/1093jitter/index.html: Analysis reveals that the larger the signal and the higher its frequency, the more it is corrupted by clock jitter. Further, it is shown that in multi-bit converters, jitter above 40kHz can't intermodulate

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Buffering on the SB3

2007-01-31 Thread sfraser
seanadams;176002 Wrote: I think you are asking the wrong question here because you are confused about how TCP and buffering work. Case in point, it took me a moment to figure out that by m/s you meant milliseconds and not meters per second! Anyway, a 50ms delay is absolutely mice nuts. On

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Buffering on the SB3

2007-01-31 Thread seanadams
sfraser;176139 Wrote: In a perfect world i would demonstrate the SB/SS working as intended in stock fashion, then i could dial back the buffer size to a point of lets say 75-100 milli-seconds, congest and introduce network failures and let the customer observe the results. I realize

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Buffering on the SB3

2007-01-31 Thread sfraser
seanadams;176146 Wrote: I realize that's what you want to do, but it is not possible because you are talking about a buffer size that is too small for TCP to stream audio even on a perfectly good network. Even below the application level, the OS presents a receive window (buffer size) to the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] plug and play linear supply (part 2)

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;176138 Wrote: Well, here's a quote from http://stereophile.com/reference/1093jitter/index.html: On the other hand it seems to me thinking about it that what's relevant is the jitter frequency mod the sampling frequency... in other words jitter at say 45.1 kHz could produce

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Digital Coax - EH???

2007-01-31 Thread FatElvis2000
P Floding;171032 Wrote: I'd just like to emphasize that a 3 meter (9 foot) cheapo might beat a 1 meter (3 foot) $200 cable. I work for a major manufacturer of consumer products. We often test products that technically do absolutely nothing, yet consumers perceive benefits based on the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread 95bcwh
tomjtx;176131 Wrote: jan, you should amend American to Republican fashion. We Democrats blame ourselves for everything :-) What's your proof that Democrats blame themselves for everything? Have you not read the news everyday? Democrats only blame others for everything. -- 95bcwh

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Digital Coax - EH???

2007-01-31 Thread snarlydwarf
SuperQ;171784 Wrote: It's sad to seen when software developers don't understand the differences, and think UDP is faster, and end up re-implementing TCP error correction over UDP. FTP is a good example of this because it uses UDP for data, even tho it has to verify that every block is

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiophile shops

2007-01-31 Thread FatElvis2000
thomsens;175554 Wrote: Point is, I think they really like pulling the vinyl out of the sleeve and putting the needle down. There is something to be said for that if it's what gets them going. I think that's a big part of it. The emotional connection is lost with 12,000 songs at one's

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Deaf Cat
Often read how isolating feet help cdps but SB? For example: http://www.audiovisualonline.co.uk/dynamic/eshop_products.set/ref/410/ixos-306-sorbothane-feet-4-pack/display.html -- Deaf Cat Deaf Cat's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread tomjtx
Deaf Cat;176188 Wrote: Often read how isolating feet help cdps but SB? For example: http://www.audiovisualonline.co.uk/dynamic/eshop_products.set/ref/410/ixos-306-sorbothane-feet-4-pack/display.html\ When Wayne of Bolder sent me the fullblown SB mods to audition he sent me 2 ebony pucks to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread ceejay
So just which part of the SB would be affected by vibration, I wonder? Ceejay -- ceejay ceejay's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=148 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Can anyone recommend a tube amp simpatico with SB3

2007-01-31 Thread MikeWynneDub
Damn! I so had my heart set on blue glowing tubes... -- MikeWynneDub MikeWynneDub's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7230 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32099

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Digital Coax - EH???

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
FatElvis2000;176176 Wrote: I work for a major manufacturer of consumer products. We often test products that technically do absolutely nothing, yet consumers perceive benefits based on the marketing concept. Perceptions are everything. The only thing that often stops us are gov't

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread mauidj
FatElvis2000;175079 Wrote: I've searched their archives for equipment I'm interested in, and they love everything. Maybe help point me to some of the negative reviews... What's with your need for negativity? Does this prove something? Stereophile reviews about 6-10 products a month and

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
mauidj;176222 Wrote: Stereophile reviews about 6-10 products a month and obviously would rather review good stuff than bad. So when asking for review samples they obviously pick products that they alreay believe will be good ones. Why would they do otherwise. Why would they do

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread jonheal
I suspend mine over a high-pressure cushion of air. Of course I have to turn the volume way up to drown out the roar of the blower. -- jonheal Jon Heal says: Have a nice day! http://www.theheals.org/ ~~~ SB3 (wired - 6.3.1) | Home-brew PC running XP Pro | DENON DRA-395 | PSB Stratus Bronze

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
I've glued a magnet to mine so I can levitate it over a superconductor. It's really annoying pouring liquid nitrogen in there all the time to keep the superconductor cool, but hey, anything for good sound... -- opaqueice

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread mauidj
opaqueice;176229 Wrote: Why would they do otherwise? Because it would actually make the magazine useful for something. When you're in the market for a new product, it's obviously very useful to have objective comparisons between products. Consumer reports, for example, is good for

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
Where are all you guys coming up with this 100% positive review stat? It just is not true. You are all asking for factual statements from this magazine yet you detractors cannot prove your own facts. Bit ironic don't you think! Hmm - in your previous posting you seemed to agree their

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread adamslim
opaqueice;176229 Wrote: Why would they do otherwise? Because it would actually make the magazine useful for something. When you're in the market for a new product, it's obviously very useful to have objective comparisons between products. Consumer reports, for example, is good for

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
j.wales;176251 Wrote: I havethe same noise - does not change with volume - but does change pitch with the brightness of the screen Do you mean the SB volume or the amp volume? -- opaqueice opaqueice's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread j . wales
I havethe same noise - does not change with volume - but does change pitch with the brightness of the screen -- j.wales j.wales's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4569 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
adamslim;176250 Wrote: I think there's actually very little stuff that's genuinely bad. Why would a manufacturer make it? Why would a dealer sell it? All there is is stuff that I like and stuff that doesn't really do it for me. Since you might like different things, it probably balances

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread Eric Carroll
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that. - Richard Feynman -- Eric Carroll Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4 SB3-Rotel RB890-BW Matrix 805 SB3-Pioneer VSX-49TXi-Mirage

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread j . wales
I leave the SB volume at 100 - regulate volume with pre-amp I have read in other posts that 100 is the ideal setting if using SB3 as source only and not as a pre-amp Also, I use the analog outs - thinking about inserting a DAC - does anyone have the hiss using the digital outs? -- j.wales

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread Eric Carroll
I have the SB3 connected via digital out to my HT. I do NOT have the issue when using digital. I do have it on analog on the same system. My tone varies both by volume and pitch as brightness and density of text on the display varies. -- Eric Carroll Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Speed
I find sky hooks very effective!! -- Speed Speed's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7311 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32301

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread jeffmeh
I have found that soap and water applied fairly regularly alleviates the need for isolating my feet. -- jeffmeh jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread totoro
tomjtx;176192 Wrote: \ When Wayne of Bolder sent me the fullblown SB mods to audition he sent me 2 ebony pucks to place under the SB. I heard absolutely no difference. i suspect these things tweak your mind more than the SB:-) Why am I not surprised? Why ebony in particular? I'd love

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
Deaf Cat;176188 Wrote: Often read how isolating feet help cdps but SB? For example: http://www.audiovisualonline.co.uk/dynamic/eshop_products.set/ref/410/ixos-306-sorbothane-feet-4-pack/display.html Warning for the BS meter hitting the right end stop: External vibrations are dissipated

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Deaf Cat
jeffmeh;176275 Wrote: I have found that soap and water applied fairly regularly alleviates the need for isolating my feet. :-D OK, I'm getting the general impressioni that apart from the wood ones no one had tried any other material..dare I ask :-) I thought it was weard when I

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread ModelCitizen
tomjtx;176192 Wrote: \ When Wayne of Bolder sent me the fullblown SB mods to audition he sent me 2 ebony pucks to place under the SB.Do you think that Wayne sent them to you as a joke or that Wayne thinks that they do make a difference to the sound? MC -- ModelCitizen Now what?

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Skunk
May I present the mother of all things squeezebox-supporting (If you can deal with it's inherent evil). http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/SHAKTI_Stone -- Skunk Skunk's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread FatElvis2000
tomjtx;176192 Wrote: \ When Wayne of Bolder sent me the fullblown SB mods to audition he sent me 2 ebony pucks to place under the SB. I heard absolutely no difference. i suspect these things tweak your mind more than the SB:-) Makes me wonder about Bolder mods -- FatElvis2000

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
FatElvis2000;176289 Wrote: Makes me wonder about Bolder mods And the Bybee filters didn't? -- opaqueice opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread Skunk
Eric Carroll;175570 Wrote: There are three people in this forum who have noticed it so far. I think you'll find there are more than that: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24445 http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26733 -- Skunk

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread tomjtx
ModelCitizen;176281 Wrote: Do you think that Wayne sent them to you as a joke or that Wayne thinks that they do make a difference to the sound? MC LOL no, unfortunately he was serious. -- tomjtx tomjtx's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread tomjtx
FatElvis2000;176289 Wrote: Makes me wonder about Bolder mods In this case, wonderment is a wonderful thing and it will save you wondering if you have wasted your money :-) -- tomjtx tomjtx's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread tomjtx
Eric Carroll;176261 Wrote: The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that. - Richard Feynman Eric, great quote, if everyone followed that advice we would put a lot of the snake oil salesmen out of

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
j.wales;176260 Wrote: I leave the SB volume at 100 - regulate volume with pre-amp So you're saying the hiss is as loud with the preamp volume at max as it is with it at zero? And that it's sensitive to the display brightness? That's very odd. -- opaqueice

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;176304 Wrote: So you're saying the hiss is as loud with the preamp volume at max as it is with it at zero? And that it's sensitive to the display brightness? That's very odd. I've noticed that, while the buzz is much quieter with the amp volume turned down, it's not as

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread totoro
P Floding;176301 Wrote: I wouldn't dismiss the possibility that things like that can alter the sound of a component, in a particular setting. It could be something as simple as the distance from the component to some other component (a metal chassis, for example) changing, which may

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
P Floding;176308 Wrote: If I understand your description correctly, I deduce that your amp is picking up the noise from the SB's display at a point after the amp's volume control. How close to the amp is the SB? Have you tested physically moving the SB? Yeah, I thought of that too, so I

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;176314 Wrote: Yeah, I thought of that too, so I tried moving the SB - to no effect as far as I could tell. But the sound is so faint with the amp volume down it's pretty hard to be sure. In that case the noise might be traveling on the interconnect, jumping to some other internal

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
P Floding;176317 Wrote: In that case the noise might be traveling on the interconnect, jumping to some other internal trace/lead and finding its way past the volume control. (I'm assuming now that it is confirmed that altering the display's brightness alters the noise.) Well, that wouldn't

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
totoro;176315 Wrote: But again, why ebony? Why not plastic or sorbothane (which would seem to be much more appropriate)? Cause it looks nice? Annoyingly I just had to experiment with this now, and I seem to get alterations in the sound. I have no idea why -or if it is just imagination. --

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread jmourik
tomjtx;176131 Wrote: jan, you should amend American to Republican fashion. We Democrats blame ourselves for everything :-) Ha, that was funny :-) opaqueice Wrote: any condition that even slightly reduces your chance of having children (including anything that increases your risk of

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Can anyone recommend a tube amp simpatico with SB3

2007-01-31 Thread SB2605
You should take a look at and listen to the PrimaLuna's from Upscale Audio. Have had my Prologue 2 for some time now and really enjoy it. Great design from Netherlands + Top notch build quality from China = Great Value. Good looks as well especially with the cage removed. Good reviews on the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
jmourik;176324 Wrote: Like opaqueice, when I'm looking into some component to buy, like right now a DAC, I want to see reviews that tell me something. If I look for reviews on the Benchmark DAC1, they all say it's a very good DAC. Until Lavry shows up, then I read Lavry is better. Can't the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread totoro
Maybe, but did he try other types of wood? There are an awful lot of tropical hardwoods, if hardwood is what's necessary (plus all kinds of non-tropical ones, while we're at it). Plus, of course, things like spruce and cedar, which are used as soundboards on stringed instruments. Just out of

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
totoro;176337 Wrote: Maybe, but did he try other types of wood? There are an awful lot of tropical hardwoods, if hardwood is what's necessary (plus all kinds of non-tropical ones, while we're at it). Plus, of course, things like spruce and cedar, which are used as soundboards on stringed

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Replay-gain and Amp clipping Question

2007-01-31 Thread CFP
Awesome, thank you for the feedback everyone. -- CFP Squeezebox 3 digital out Panasonic SA-XR57 Energy Veritas 2.4i CFP's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6915 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Skunk
totoro;176337 Wrote: Maybe, but did he try other types of wood? There are an awful lot of tropical hardwoods, if hardwood is what's necessary (plus all kinds of non-tropical ones, while we're at it). Plus, of course, things like spruce and cedar, which are used as soundboards on stringed

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread totoro
P Floding;176338 Wrote: I had some cones of some unspecified artificial (plasticky) material laying around. They seem to have been cast from this material. I'm very sceptical about it all, but I believe in trying everything to rule it out before assuming things. Sure can throw up surprises

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread totoro
Skunk;176341 Wrote: Wouldn't you want the opposite of a highly resonant species for a speaker baffle or equipment support, or even piano key I suppose? I have an ebony fetish personally, and find it soothing to hold when I'm at the wood store. Always been too cheap to buy any though :-)

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread P Floding
totoro;176343 Wrote: I remember reading on a newsgroup recently that some of the early a/d converters used by recording studios didn't dither, which was a real problem. Supposedly, this had a bad effect on a lot of early cd releases which were recorded using them. Yes, but that is like

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread totoro
P Floding;176347 Wrote: Yes, but that is like nothing compared to the sound quality (or lack of it) of the early CD players. Ah. I didn't get a cd player until 92 or so, so I missed that phase. -- totoro squeezebox 3 - mccormack dna .5 - audio physic tempo 4

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-31 Thread jmourik
P Floding;176327 Wrote: They are all (mostly) good. The problem is that hacks have to write something.. ;-)Yup, and people like me like to read it! I now have subscriptions to TAS and Stereophile. Why? Because I enjoy reading them and subscriptions are cheap! I bought Stereophile last

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread muski
Have a look at the 'Associated Equipment' sidebar of the Transporter review in the Feb 2006 of Stereophile and you'll see listed Ayre Myrtle Wood blocks. (oh, Myrtle wood, not ebony.) Given the article's bizarre opening metaphor, I was expecting polished turds... -- muski

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread tyler_durden
totoro;176315 Wrote: But again, why ebony? Why not plastic or sorbothane (which would seem to be much more appropriate)? Isn't it obvious? Ebony is the wood used to make the black keys on a piano (at least, it used to be). If it is musical enough for a piano, it is certainly musical enough

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread GaryB
Deaf Cat;176188 Wrote: Often read how isolating feet help cdps but SB? You mean something like this? ---Gary +---+ |Filename: SB3_cones.JPG| |Download:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Skunk
totoro;176345 Wrote: Yep, I would think so. I'd think for vibration absorbing, though, you'd want something like sorbothane, rather than a really hard wood. Perhaps, but be prepared to lose a bit of image focus and bass authority. -- Skunk

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread GaryB
Skunk;176373 Wrote: I tried that with audio points (for a funny picture!), but couldn't balance the back bar. You're assuming that I did this as a joke . . . Not so fast. I'm a bit reluctant to bring this up at all given the way this board and thread seems to assume that tweaks of any sort

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Skunk
tyler_durden;176370 Wrote: This is the same sort of nonsense that has some people at DIYaudio.com trying to make heatsinks out of bronze and finishing the wood cases of their home made electronics (yes, wood!) with violin lacquer. I'm afraid it's leeched into the general marketplace as

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread tyler_durden
Skunk;176376 Wrote: I'm afraid it's leeched into the general marketplace as well... It's very highly reviewed though (tpfic) I'd hardly call THAT the general marketplace. I once saw some stuff about a vibration isolating table for tube amplifiers that was filled with sand because the sand

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread totoro
GaryB;176375 Wrote: Don't waste the bandwidth until you've done some experiments. The willingness to draw conclusions without any experimental work is amazingly unscientific. Happy listening. ---Gary Science is not done by people randomly trying stuff with no idea why it would or

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread GaryB
totoro;176379 Wrote: Science is not done by people randomly trying stuff with no idea why it would or wouldn't work. The scientific method has several steps: 1. Observe some aspect of the universe. 2. Invent a tentative description, called a hypothesis, that is consistent with what you have

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Irritating whistle on right channel from SB3

2007-01-31 Thread Eric Carroll
Skunk;176295 Wrote: I think you'll find there are more than that: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24445 http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26733 Skunk, Words from the master, no less. Thanks for pointing it out. Damn, I even looked for this using google and went

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Listener
ceejay;176190 Wrote: So just which part of the SB would be affected by vibration, I wonder? Ceejay Dancing feet under the SB should help with PRAT. Bill -- Listener Listener's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread Skunk
GaryB;176375 Wrote: You're assuming that I did this as a joke . . . I can't deny that, what with the lack of wires etc. No disrespect was intended though. Considering how well you know your way around the inside of the Sb, I wouldn't discount your opinion on any tweak. FWIW, I do own the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread opaqueice
GaryB;176381 Wrote: The fact that there aren't good theories doesn't invalidate the observation of an experimental result. But you see, there is a perfectly good hypothesis, backed by centuries of scientific theory and experiment, that explains the result you reported above. It's got

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread GaryB
tyler_durden;176370 Wrote: This is the same sort of nonsense that has some people at DIYaudio.com trying to make heatsinks out of bronze and finishing the wood cases of their home made electronics (yes, wood!) with violin lacquer. Gee Tyler, I like building electronics in wood boxes. It's

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread totoro
GaryB;176394 Wrote: Gee Tyler, I like building electronics in wood boxes. It's easier to work with wood than with metal and it looks better. Below are pictures of my homebrew gainclone amplifier. Sounds pretty good if I do say so myself. ---Gary That's a nice looking amp. Nothing wrong

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread GaryB
opaqueice;176390 Wrote: You haven't presented any credible evidence that there's an effect here. Please don't be offended, but the fact that you think you heard something isn't very meaningful (because it can be explained by psychology in a way that's extremely well-documented and

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any one tried isolating feet on their SB ?

2007-01-31 Thread GaryB
totoro;176397 Wrote: But you didn't claim it sounds better _because_ it's in a wood box rather than a metal one in your post. I think that was more what tyler was getting at (I could be putting words in his mouth, but his comments made me think of the Infamous Knob of Death). BTW, you've