Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] squeezebox setup for audiophiles

2011-03-18 Thread Pat Farrell
han properly positioning my speakers. YMMV -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Mac Mini as server?

2011-03-14 Thread Pat Farrell
never designed for high accuracy in either a studio or audiophile world. And its never going to meet the needs of either a recording studio or a serious audiophile. Look elsewhere. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audio

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why do things sound the way they do?

2011-03-11 Thread Pat Farrell
ound of the guitar comes from the strings, pickups and amp (plus effects if you use them), but the sound you hear depends on that plus the way the guitarist plays it. In the 60s, there was graffiti all over London saying "Clapton is God" which might be a bit of an exaggeration, but

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter $999

2011-03-10 Thread Pat Farrell
On 03/10/2011 02:26 PM, ralphpnj wrote: > And what does "OBE" stand for? I always heard Overtaken By Events but in this case, perhaps Obsoleted By Europeans -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing lis

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-27 Thread Pat Farrell
t as an exercise to the student. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-27 Thread Pat Farrell
se closest to you, the rest are a buzz. But if your kid calls "mom" or "dad" then you pick it out instantly. Everyone there answers to mom or dad, but they are all listening to something specific. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-27 Thread Pat Farrell
e shape of the frequency distribution. While I canceled my subscription to The Absolute Sound in disgust, they are right one thing. The goal of music reproduction is to sound like un-amplified instruments and voices in real music halls. There are no crossovers screwing up the phase with a real singer

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-27 Thread Pat Farrell
oblem. Same with folks who love Lowthers and flee watt amps. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-26 Thread Pat Farrell
player, going to Interlochen Arts Camp, having private lessions for 5+ years, etc. I know very well what the sound of a trumpet is in my house. Playing Winton Marsalis on my very nice stereo is not the same. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarre

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-26 Thread Pat Farrell
f hi-fi focuses instead on frequency. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] any ideas accepted

2011-01-22 Thread Pat Farrell
? As you add still more crossovers, it becomes more impossible to keep then phase correct. Get a Quad or Maggie instead, no stinking crossover. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdev

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is a Transporter SE?

2011-01-17 Thread Pat Farrell
er the years.) I have one of the first production Transporters. I was not in the beta program. I played with the knob the first days I had it. Its a cool technical tour-de-force, dynamically programmable force feedback. I've never touched the knob in the years since. -- Pat Farrell h

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...

2011-01-11 Thread Pat Farrell
y that there is actually any signficant bits in the last 8 bits of any 24 bit sample made from it. Those machines barely had 70 dB of SNR. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hifi rack: wood or glass shelves?

2010-12-30 Thread Pat Farrell
On 12/30/2010 10:22 AM, konut wrote: > Glass has the potential to vibrate. I stick with wood. The stuff that they use to make guitars and violins? -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] My perfect audiophile box

2010-11-12 Thread Pat Farrell
aimed at audiophiles cost $1,000. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Best place to see my Benchmark DAC1

2010-11-11 Thread Pat Farrell
e WAF high, some of the old stuff gets sold. I'm even thinking of selling some of my 30+ microphones. I still have a pair of 70s vintage "Large Advent" speakers, my 40 year old 35mm film darkroom, . -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ __

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Best place to see my Benchmark DAC1

2010-11-11 Thread Pat Farrell
ich is important when the music room is also the living room. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Best place to see my Benchmark DAC1

2010-11-10 Thread Pat Farrell
. I've only got the one DAC, its not like I need a store. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Best place to see my Benchmark DAC1

2010-11-09 Thread Pat Farrell
" and it fairly expensive. So what do you think is the best place to sell used audiophile gear? Thank Pat -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] High definition digital vs red book

2010-10-29 Thread Pat Farrell
mpressive. But too many are mangled by marketing, idiot producers, etc. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Stereophile Review II: What conclusion can be drawn from the Measurements?

2010-09-23 Thread Pat Farrell
longer working. Its the golden rule, he who has the gold rules. There are lots in the industry responsible, but its not because the engineers are uneducated. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Stereophile Review II: What conclusion can be drawn from the Measurements?

2010-09-23 Thread Pat Farrell
quality does not care. That folks won't pay for better quality. Its a market thing, not education. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Unbalanced Analog Cable Help

2010-09-22 Thread Pat Farrell
ables can go hundreds of feet, whereas unbalanced are usually under 3 feet long, and get pretty wonky after 10 feet or so. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Unbalanced Analog Cable Help

2010-09-21 Thread Pat Farrell
studio, you can also send balanced signals down a 1/4" TRS jack (looks like a stereo headphone jack). This connection takes up less space in a rack than XLR connections. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Stereophile Review II: What conclusion can be drawn from the Measurements?

2010-09-17 Thread Pat Farrell
On 09/17/2010 02:46 PM, seanadams wrote: > I haven't read the review yet but if the touch is resolving 17 bits that > is probably the correct maximum capability of the DAC chip. All things > have a noise floor... it is not realistic to expect that > performance from a $300 device employing a single

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] USB vs Toslink

2010-08-17 Thread Pat Farrell
first SlimDevice SB-1 ages ago. PCs are evil places with tons of noise, both physical vibrations and strange and stray electrical signals. My rule is do PC stuff in the PC, and do quality audio stuff out in an external box. A Touch is a great way to get the signal out of any PC. -- Pat Farrel

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Sound quality between wav and flac

2010-08-17 Thread Pat Farrell
rm "ripping" became popular, but not a good description of what actually happens. There is no difference in sound quality, there is no difference in the decompressed files. Its easy to test for yourself. Any person who claims otherwise is blowing smoke. -- Pat Fa

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Switching to slow rollof filter in AK4396

2010-08-12 Thread Pat Farrell
On 08/12/2010 05:22 PM, andyg wrote: > I hope you guys will be able to tell some difference because I sure > can't. Well, Andy, you would clearly hear a veil being lifted if your system had enough ByBee caps and $1000 interconnects. ___ audiophiles ma

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Digital OUT encoding on TP, now AES & S/PDIF together

2010-07-28 Thread Pat Farrell
ary the 'new' digital audio. For sure, and putting a digital signal through a TT patch panel is going to do wonderful things to the wave forms. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Confused between options - any advice welcome

2010-07-11 Thread Pat Farrell
> Proper active speakers (not just speakers with amps inside them) are an > expensive proposition... Yes, but IMHO, they are the future. I don't think you save money, but the amp engineer can deliver what the driver engineer wants, how, when, what flavor, etc. -- Pat F

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What's next or is this it?

2010-07-09 Thread Pat Farrell
On 07/09/2010 10:03 AM, michael123 wrote: > So, you say that the audio design ends at 200$? No I am saying that if you expect significant improvements in audio quality by changing a $1 cap with a $200 cap, you are drinking All IMHO, YMMV, etc -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What's next or is this it?

2010-07-09 Thread Pat Farrell
> Cast-PIO.. it costs accordingly.. Do you seriously think that replacing a $2 cap with a $50 cap will greatly change the sound? Does the term eye candy for rich people mean anything to you? -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiop

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What's next or is this it?

2010-07-07 Thread Pat Farrell
way. The cost of electronics is not the cost of the parts. Its the engineering, NRE, non-recurring engineering expense. The only way to lower the impact of the NRE is to move more units. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles ma

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What's next or is this it?

2010-07-07 Thread Pat Farrell
ean, but never sold in any volume, and was too "computer" for the audiophile purists, and too high priced for consumers. Suppose someone wanted to make a TP-2, it would be what percent "better" than the initial TP, in what area would you put the engineering? He&

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Lossless download sites?

2010-07-03 Thread Pat Farrell
On 07/03/2010 09:10 PM, Robin Bowes wrote: > On 04/07/10 00:59, Pat Farrell wrote: >> No arguments possible from the evil goons at the RIAA, I have the cd, >> case, all that crap. > > ...except that is technically not legal in the UK. Well, here it is technocally illegal to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Lossless download sites?

2010-07-03 Thread Pat Farrell
files. This is what I've been doing for 5 or so years. No arguments possible from the evil goons at the RIAA, I have the cd, case, all that crap. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Lossless download sites?

2010-07-03 Thread Pat Farrell
tc is so processed that lossless is not that important. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Yet another Touch vs. Transporter thread

2010-06-22 Thread Pat Farrell
ething than 24. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Yet another Touch vs. Transporter thread

2010-06-22 Thread Pat Farrell
ey are not changing the physics. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Yet another Touch vs. Transporter thread

2010-06-22 Thread Pat Farrell
ere. And, IMHO, there will never be a Logitech TP 2. Perhaps a Sean's Garage TP 2, if he hasn't gone off to spend his retirement surfing. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdev

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Vintage equipment: Opinions?

2010-06-07 Thread Pat Farrell
the Dynaco ST400 was famous for blowing up. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] The sound of jitter

2010-05-18 Thread Pat Farrell
hype, a way to sucker audiophiles out of their money. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hard facts supporting the quality of Touch digital out.

2010-05-12 Thread Pat Farrell
ave the right sources. But I don't keep the email archives, and I hate using the Forum software, so I can't help you there. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-05 Thread Pat Farrell
"digital volume control" is talking about a nearly trivial single multiply or shift function. DSP is more like dealing with quantum physics rather than Newtonian physics. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-03 Thread Pat Farrell
th the old LA-2 compressors and tape saturation. I would think that it could be perfectly matched with enough DSP power. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-03 Thread Pat Farrell
are wave, it just gets nearly flat. Using the natural roll off of an analog tape was part of the art of audio engineering. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-02 Thread Pat Farrell
mswlogo wrote: > You guys are clueless. Now you resort to personal insults. That lowers your SeanTrollScale to 0/10 You are still a troll Do not feed the trolls. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-02 Thread Pat Farrell
e rate, you are forcing distortion. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
mswlogo wrote: > We determine the speed at which IONS fly through a vaccum in order to > determine their Mass. I did that in high school physics class, over 40 years ago. You are still a troll, and your score is no higher than 1/10 on the SeanTrollScale -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarre

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
mswlogo wrote: > I work with analog and digital signals at data rates that would make > your head spin. Specifics please? > Replies like yours are priceless. > > I'm sorry that the clipping I'm referring to is beyond your grasp. 1/10 -- Pat Farrel

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display problems

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
mlsstl wrote: > I didn't know they were interviewing candidates for the position of > forum cop. Guess I need to watch my step from here on out and keep my > opinions to myself.... 0/10 -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audio

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display problems

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
o or three Touch units. But back when the Transporter came out, there was nothing like it. And it still sounds pretty darn good. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display problems

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
ow to fix what I don't own. ;-) Seems a bit weird that you were so concerned, while the TP is still for sale, its no longer a $2000 product and its not getting any press. Even audiophiles like their tail fins. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display problems

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
s ago, I could rebuild the four-barrel carb on my Pontiac 389 V8, as well as nearly anything else on the car. With modern fuel injection and mixture and spark advance systems, they are considered black boxes that are replaced. Even TVs have become like toasters, use and throw away. -- Pat Farr

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-27 Thread Pat Farrell
rice/performance deals in the 70s. But they had two characterists that were not talked about nearly as much as their great performance: 1) they were amazingly inefficient, and needed serious power to drive 2) they sounded great when loud, but totally unimpressive at low volume (say background m

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-25 Thread Pat Farrell
e walls, with strange angles to all the joints so the sound echoes off in all sorts of wild directions. It too was a place you didn't want to be in for very long. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list au

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-25 Thread Pat Farrell
ry weird. Neither of them were underground, but they were weird enough that I couldn't stand being in either for more than a few minutes. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com ht

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-25 Thread Pat Farrell
of your ears. The value is calculated. The calculations are simple. I've got a write up on this page: http://www.pfarrell.com/prc/bits.html The calculation is driven by the number of bits in the signal. Each bit gives you about 6 dB of range. 16*6 is 96. -- Pat Farrell http:/

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-24 Thread Pat Farrell
he fundamental concepts of modern science. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-24 Thread Pat Farrell
ny musical content over 40kHz. None. Sony's DSD has serious noise shaping changing the signal in the 35kHz an up range. If you love it, fine. but don't pretend that its anything humans or even dogs could hear. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-24 Thread Pat Farrell
taging is an orthogonal issue. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Optical out;no optical in question.

2010-04-21 Thread Pat Farrell
aches. If all you have are analog RCA, be happy. There are coax digital connections terminated with RCA, but they are pretty rare. I haven't looked at my Touch carefully recently, but I don't remember it having a coax digital output. Toslink, sure. -- Pat Far

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporters Future?

2010-04-13 Thread Pat Farrell
richardw wrote: > sorry you struggle reading my lack of interest in the shift key. I share Robin's view that your words would be easier to read if you took a nanosecond to use proper capitalization. But then, perhaps you are not really interested in communicating. -- Pat Farr

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Memristance in interconnect cables

2010-04-11 Thread Pat Farrell
ge on the GI bill in the early 50s had access to a lot of war surplus gear with RCA connections. They were cheap and adequate for the time. Its not like they are actually a good connection. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Memristance in interconnect cables

2010-04-11 Thread Pat Farrell
er Electrical Engineering professor would say, the electron holes, which flow for electrical current, don't know direction. Shields are good, which is why RCA connectors are lame. Use proper balanced connections, like the Transporter supports. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] RC (Inguz etc.)

2010-04-11 Thread Pat Farrell
ed for megadollar interconnects. I probably have 30 suitable cables in lengths from 3 feet to 50 feet in my basement/studio. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevic

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 7.5 & Transporter

2010-04-08 Thread Pat Farrell
While there are bug fixes, and probably some features that I have not noticed, the heart of 7.5 is support for the Touch. Its been a non-event as far as the rest of my SlimDevices collection is concerned. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-05 Thread Pat Farrell
the way of the dodo. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-04 Thread Pat Farrell
the circumstances are different, and all the surgeon has is my pocket Swiss Army knife, I bet the surgeon will do better than an intern. Its about the music, not geeks claiming mine is bigger -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing l

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Switching to slow rollof filter in AK4396

2010-04-03 Thread Pat Farrell
expect that there is no business case for putting "much" effort into the Transporter. I have no idea what the suitable definition of "much" is, but I expect its close to zero. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophile

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-03 Thread Pat Farrell
try some 20 years to get them right. I wouldn't say it took 20 years to get right. It did take five to ten years. The problem is that the music industry (and the RIAA) have no interest in music. They care only about sales and revenue. Its only the boutique folks that care a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-30 Thread Pat Farrell
so the ancient distinctions are vague and occasionally meaningless. I expect that in time, there will be very little "hardware" differences in even high end audio equipment. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audio

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
ota. Real computers (desktops, laptops, etc., as opposed to embedded systems) have gotten so powerful that 99% of the buyers never use even a fraction of their capabilities. Pat -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
ion of "upgrading the hardware" While the 'high end' audio folks have a longer time frame, anything computer related that is four or five years old is economically obsolete. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mai

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
t asking the same thing over and over. One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
the skills you claim, built your own. Otherwise, please, go away. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
michael123 wrote: > Shall I continue? No You have become a troll. And your SeanTrollScore for these recent posts is 0/10. See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76315 -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing l

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-26 Thread Pat Farrell
t posts >> is 0/10. See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76315 You can't get a negative score on the SeanTrollScore, but we may have to change the rules just for you. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-26 Thread Pat Farrell
ged by anyone not employed by Logitech. And I bet its not going to be changed by anyone emplyeed at Logitech either. Give it up. You have become a troll. And your SeanTrollScore for these recent posts is 0/10. See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.ph

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-26 Thread Pat Farrell
re is not open source, the CPU is too slow. Accept it and move on with your life -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-23 Thread Pat Farrell
project, it makes far less. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-23 Thread Pat Farrell
eeds a special compiler and linker, and the license for that costs solid five figures. So they thought that no one would spring for a legal license, so there was no reason to release the firmware source code. I have worked on other embedded systems, and expensive tools are frequent in the business. -

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] listening to HD Audio (24/96)

2010-03-09 Thread Pat Farrell
rdly "early beta" Even the tinySBS is stable and works well. > In any event, you have both a Transporter and a Touch, are you > experiencing problems with 24/96? Nope, no problems, but I don't have much 24/88.2 o 24/96 content. --

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] listening to HD Audio (24/96)

2010-03-08 Thread Pat Farrell
ny months If you check the developers forum, you will see that 7.5.0 has been feature frozen as they beat down the last few high priority bugs. I'd be serious beers that it will be released by the end of March, this year. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Subwoofer for Active Speakers?

2010-03-01 Thread Pat Farrell
y signals that the mains can't handle from reaching the main woofers.] I don't think you could easily connect my particular REL model to active speakers. There are no speaker-level connections on most (all?) active speakers to tap into.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC - does it make a difference?

2010-02-19 Thread Pat Farrell
Curt962 wrote: > Of course the best equipment will be capable of resolving the smallest > subtleties better than will lesser components. For some suitable definition of "best equipment" Perhaps. Maybe. -- Pat Farrell http://

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter troubleshooting question

2010-02-19 Thread Pat Farrell
cosmopolous wrote: > I'll try that tonight. fingers crossed. > Is this something that's common? It happens. I've had it perhaps twice in the many years that I've had my Transporter. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Upgrade. Weiss DAC202 (Minerva) or Berkeley Alpha?

2010-02-12 Thread Pat Farrell
her paragraphs, which were pure hype. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Upgrade. Weiss DAC202 (Minerva) or Berkeley Alpha?

2010-02-12 Thread Pat Farrell
in the "An interesting video" thread If you want to argue that we would be better off with 18 or 20 bit files instead of the RedBook's 16 bits, you would have at least a leg to stand on. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ aud

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-02-05 Thread Pat Farrell
tle stuff. A standard jazz trio, of piano, drums and standup bass, has lots of the subtle stuff that MP3 does badly. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.co

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-02-03 Thread Pat Farrell
Kuro wrote: > I'm (we're) your paying customers. You do not call your paying > customers trolls. Sean is retired. You are not his customer. You are a troll. Do not feed the trolls. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ aud

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-02-03 Thread Pat Farrell
:43. Specifically: "Please troll elsewhere. Nothing about TCP/IP can cause jitter in any SqueezeBox device. You have been told this, pay attention." -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevic

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-02-03 Thread Pat Farrell
se jitter in any SqueezeBox device. You have been told this, pay attention. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-01-31 Thread Pat Farrell
on the SB2 and all later models. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-01-31 Thread Pat Farrell
fferent WiFi and wired Ethernet? That makes zero sense. And "jitter" is not going to vary due to the network wiring. The network has nothing to do with the DAC's clock. I'm all for you liking one way or the other, personal tastes being personal. But your claim makes zero sense fr

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Touch versus Transporter - beta testers chime in please

2010-01-31 Thread Pat Farrell
h does not have balanced outputs, which are handy if your amp has balanced input. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter or wait for Touch?

2010-01-26 Thread Pat Farrell
ry few people can get along with only one SqueezeBoxen I have not done A/B comparison between my Touch and my TP, but the Touch is very nice. I have a TP, Touch, Boom, Radio, Duet, and have bought and used three plain SqueezeBoxen. So I'm a bit biased. -- Pat Farre

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Does the Transporter come with rackmount ears?

2010-01-26 Thread Pat Farrell
jtf wrote: > looking at buying a Transporter and it said that rackmount ears are > available. It didn't say that they actually came in the box. They do not come in the box. Someone more plugged into the retail channel will have to address if they are still available

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiophile portable player - with some conditions

2010-01-19 Thread Pat Farrell
d use multiple cores. Nearly all serious desktops these days are quad, and even most "better than netbook" laptops are at least dual core. Soon, all desktops will be at least 8 cores. Most of the time, if you use a cron job to make the parallel mp3 tree, you don't care how long it

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiophile portable player - with some conditions

2010-01-19 Thread Pat Farrell
storage of two formats, or even three if you keep flac, MP3 and audio comppressed version, is not an issue. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/ma

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >