Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac not compatable with SBT?

2012-07-09 Thread cfraser
In the audiophile world (parallel universe...), ASRC is kin to satan. Just kin though. i.e. 88.2kHz-96kHz sample rate If somebody sold 96/24 downloads that had ASRC previously applied to them, they'd sure hear about it, and so would just about everyone else. It's not easy to hide if you look.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac not compatable with SBT?

2012-07-06 Thread cfraser
I have used DACs with the SBT that do exactly what the OP is talking about. And still have one...the problem is no mystery to me. It is NOT specifically an SBT problem, it will happen with any source that can drastically change sample rate, with DACs that have this type of clock circuitry.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-07-05 Thread cfraser
*Buffer* and reclock is the big thing, maybe the Synchro-Mesh does that? (I've never heard of it except here.) Actually, that's what I assumed you meant in your original comment, as mostly only uncheap S/PDIF DACs do it.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac not compatable with SBT?

2012-07-04 Thread cfraser
Soulkeeper wrote: Have you considered going around the problem by configuring LMS to upsample all 44.1 kHz material to 88.2 kHz, and all 48 kHz material to 96 kHz? That is a good idea! It might just work. [What it does is put the sample frequencies that the PLL needs to lock on much closer

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac not compatable with SBT?

2012-07-03 Thread cfraser
Some DACs, typically older but not necessarily *old*, have difficulty re-establishing (PLL) sync when the sample frequency changes. Not from 44 to 48kHz, but any freqs much more apart from that, and that's what happens. I've seen it plenty, and other people here have asked about other DACs that

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Dac not compatable with SBT?

2012-07-03 Thread cfraser
It is possible that in your newer DAC they did in fact improve it: improving the PLL circuitry *could* have the effect of not allowing it to get lock over as wide a frequency range, but rather it more tenaciously maintains the first frequency it locked on. You have found the dark side of it.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Impedance Matching Squeezeboxen to DACs

2012-07-01 Thread cfraser
^ Do you use that Neutrik adapter to plug directly into your DAC? What I'm getting at is I want to avoid having to use 2 cables, and was hoping the adapter has XLR male pins in such a manner it plugs directly into the DAC (pics I've seen don't show the XLR end clearly). Oh yeah: big Neutrik fan,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Impedance Matching Squeezeboxen to DACs

2012-07-01 Thread cfraser
^ You can still stream up to 96/24 PCM using the current (non-beta) LMS and it works fine with EDO, that's what I do. S/PDIF coax. Agree streaming PCM is preferable than decoding e.g. FLAC on the SBT, at least here.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Impedance Matching Squeezeboxen to DACs

2012-06-28 Thread cfraser
^ Tell me more!! Please. I have never heard of such an xfmr before, but I should have known they existed... The AES/EBU sounds better here too. Has an open-ness and a sense of the music coming out of infinite blackness; very noticeable when other DACs/inputs *don't* have it. I have not opened

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-06-23 Thread cfraser
alfista wrote: Granted, but those prototypes are generally less reliable and don't exactly perform better than finished production units. Also granted; and a prototype is never meant to actually be used by anybody. Some insist on destroying them (all sorts of reasons), and unfortunately from

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-06-22 Thread cfraser
^ Thanks. I had absolutely no idea people were doing SBT internal stuff like that. I think I'll look into it more, but I'd have to get another Touch first, can't risk being without one fully functional. As for the sandwich box, it was done neatly...I am used to seeing prototypes of all sorts of

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-06-18 Thread cfraser
Due to the title of this thread, anything that is NOT subjective doesn't really belong here, if you want to get technical... I'm sure Triode is tired of hearing the same praise over and over... :) So what do you want people to talk about here? I got the distinct impression Triode *wanted* us to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-06-18 Thread cfraser
^ Speaking from the Judea People's Front: I missed the sandwich box and duct tape episode. Are there re-runs anywhere? :) Seriously, I'd like to see it. I don't mind trying weird $#!+ if it's not a lot of trouble/messy and is free. Most of the time I undo it anyways.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-06-12 Thread cfraser
^ lol, I forget why I even said that now. I guess it's obvious you'd need a proper/good logic analyzer to monitor an actual design. I was probably thinking along the lines of the differences between running slightly different code is sufficiently significant that it can be detected at some

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-06-11 Thread cfraser
^ The butterfly effect? Let me be a bit of a devil's advocate... I think you'd agree that different code, no matter how apparently trivially different, executes differently. The electronically different results are easily seen with the proper gear. Hell, the 3-letter-agencies can tell exactly

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-06-02 Thread cfraser
^ I checked SBGK's 999.../4 buffer size, as he originally posted it, and the Large buffer size option. With EDO 0.6. The debug output results for both are identical to each other and to what you showed in post #54. I am still running with 0.6 and SBGK's very large buffer size spec. Haven't

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAS versus PC - any sound quality difference?

2012-05-30 Thread cfraser
^ You are quite right about that, it was the only fly in the ointment with WOL here. That is until today, when for some reason my WOL setup seemed to stop working after a couple days of being fine. Needs some fine-tuning somewhere lol. Not unexpected... Hey Pneumonic, never noticed you here

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAS versus PC - any sound quality difference?

2012-05-29 Thread cfraser
Thank-you very much for the Fit etc. info guys, food for thought. I've been looking around at some options mentioned. Now I want a Sheevaplug, but I don't know for what. If somebody gave me a Vortexbox... For my purposes, I can't come up with a single reason to NOT use my regular desktop PC for

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAS versus PC - any sound quality difference?

2012-05-28 Thread cfraser
RonM wrote: I use a dedicated 24/7 small PC, not a NAS. It has all my many music files on its 500gb internal 2.5 drive, and runs ONLY LMS plus the software necessary to run headless (allows remote control from my other devices). The one I use, Fit-PC2, uses very little power under load,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-05-24 Thread cfraser
guidof wrote: I have done extensive comparisons of EDO 0.6 and 0.7 and for the most part agree with your impressions. I have not done extensive listening with 0.6, mostly with 0.5 and then 0.7 when it arrived; 0.6 came and went so fast that I never even got to install it before 0.7 was

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-05-24 Thread cfraser
^ I thought it *was* galvanically isolated. Maybe not though, just the usual transformers. I do not have any quality glass Toslink cables anymore, so can't really test that option fairly (it sounds dead with the best Toslink I still do have). However, we are only comparing different versions of

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-05-23 Thread cfraser
Triode: I thought I had the manual install of non-current versions of EDO all figgered out before, but careful analysis (OK, further casual looking...) shows I don't after all. So I unzip the EDO download and put all the files in the (same) correct place, that's pretty obvious; reboot and it

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-05-23 Thread cfraser
^ Thanks. LOL, I was wondering where the version numbers came from... And of course I really only wanted to see those for easy reference, but ssh-ing in to look is no big prob either. cfraser's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-05-23 Thread cfraser
I still gotta say that 0.6 as heard here has something special to it. I don't know how to describe it, but if the sound was an object I might say sophisticated/luxury. It feels very pleasant and personal. I have some doubt about the accuracy of this sound, but I do like being coddled in it so

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-05-22 Thread cfraser
It might be convenient if SBGK put some instructions on how to install older versions of EDO in his blog, like where to copy the files. You are welcome for me volunteering you. :) I don't have a blog etc. or else I'd do it. I get the impression that the instructions might not be welcome in any

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New SBT person old Audiophile

2012-04-26 Thread cfraser
cfraser wrote: It can potentially sound better with all the useless threads, if less variation in power supply buss noise is better. By keeping a continuous CPU loading, rather than having it vary, this might sound better to you. Depends what those useless threads are actually doing too

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New SBT person old Audiophile

2012-04-25 Thread cfraser
edodo wrote: It is not logical in the contrary to believe leaving all those CPU consuming useless threads that it will sound better. Your opinion may vary. It can potentially sound better with all the useless threads, if less variation in power supply buss noise is better. By keeping a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Triode's USB 24/192 plug in - sound quality impressions

2012-04-23 Thread cfraser
^ My impressions via S/PDIF into a BDA-1 are almost identical to yours. It's a very decent sound signature, which also happens to carry through to lower bitrates than 192/24 (at least it does here). I quite like it, there's nothing annoying about it lol, and that's rare enough for me. The bass

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Is this a good way to go?

2012-04-16 Thread cfraser
^ I've never found that iPeng was sluggish. Could it be wake on LAN or something similar causing it, which I don't use? cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-04-06 Thread cfraser
touchup wrote: That's how I found out that WAVs at least to my ears sound so consistently better. I cannot explain why. I know it shouldn't, but there it is. Don't worry, it drives me nuts what some changes do. I can't explain them either, the craziest (to me) being the size of the ALSA

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SBT meme

2012-04-05 Thread cfraser
The guy who said buy a good DAC is right, that has to be #2, even before the PS or TT3.0 However, one very important point of TT3.0 is the ability to kill the display processes. Not the same as making the screen black. But probably not as good as disconnecting the whole LCD display as well as

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-03-09 Thread cfraser
to CHEAP stuff like the SBT. You can be sure Klaus didn't use rubbish to tune his mods. Or, of course, he wouldn't have bothered doing ANY of them in the first place. Because they make no difference... -- cfraser cfraser's Profile

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-03-07 Thread cfraser
an external DAC, and I am astonished what it does to IR via the SBT compared to the IR I get directly via my Denon AVR (this sounds truly dreadful, all other radio incl. AM/FM/Sirius does too). -- cfraser cfraser's Profile

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-03-05 Thread cfraser
use static addies at home already. If the full version (where is that?) is only ~$1 that is cool to just try and see if I actually use the ssh capability downstairs these days. Something new to play with... -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-02-29 Thread cfraser
for internet radio etc. and don't want to necessarily have a computer on. iPod ssh would allow me to do config changes in that case.] -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-02-29 Thread cfraser
then. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] FUD, intellectual honesty, digital facts, and the TAS articles...

2012-02-29 Thread cfraser
a fancier PS more worthwhile there. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93549

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-08 Thread cfraser
. It may not be right, but for the music I listen to it's unfatiguing and I'd even say exciting. Not a lot to complain about... This particular tuning is a good option for a lot of the compressed and flat music/remasterings that seem to be commonplace now. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-07 Thread cfraser
meddling with it. (I hope that prevents anybody from saying that I'm acting as though it's mine.) Send your email addy to me by PM if my email isn't available to you. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-07 Thread cfraser
fully-implemented priority sets is so different that you'll know if you forgot the reboot. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-07 Thread cfraser
. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-06 Thread cfraser
in general.] -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-06 Thread cfraser
expectations. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-05 Thread cfraser
it and went back to it, maybe without even knowing it... -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-05 Thread cfraser
. With any config you want, even plain TT3.0. I know many/most find tt -k is an improvement, just wondering if any found the opposite. Edit: just a coincidence that SBGK mentioned tt -k before me, I didn't even see his post while I was writing this. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-05 Thread cfraser
beforehand. I thought I was already done with this problem and real progress had been made... -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-02 Thread cfraser
that I don't recognize yet, maybe hanging around from some app I no longer even use (e.g. McAffee and iTunes caused issues, they're gone). -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-02 Thread cfraser
last week. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-02 Thread cfraser
and the one I'm talking-up is of course one of them. It happened shortly before NoRaDa started posting his tables, and is *very probably* the original forerunner to what he calls Guido F. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-02 Thread cfraser
, a large or small buffer, no obvious way to tell how it'll sound. Sometimes 3200 is as good or better than 2, sometimes worse. Sometimes you gain one thing but lose at the other end of the freq spectrum. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-02 Thread cfraser
or whatever, that it is the best? Never will happen, not when opinion enters into it. And this is all opinion. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-01 Thread cfraser
bumping the buffer up to some sizes is much *worse* than some sizes of smaller buffers. Somewhere some Logitech employee is drunk with laughter. I know I would be if somebody online was trying to figger out my RT code setup... -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-31 Thread cfraser
. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-31 Thread cfraser
their own thread so that Klaus' thread was strictly dedicated to TT = more accessible to newcomers too... Just a thought...it must seem like incomprehensible gobbledygook to those who haven't started at the beginning. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-31 Thread cfraser
hear what can be done, I think it's worthwhile to pursue it to the bitter end lol. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-31 Thread cfraser
] -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-30 Thread cfraser
) interpretations... -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-29 Thread cfraser
I am wondering if you guys do anything special with your servers while listening to music. Such as shut down all/most apps that have nothing to do with it, or at least the apps that may use the LAN/web. Thanks. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-29 Thread cfraser
my iPod iPeng) are among the worst for interfering, so I regularly kill those. I find everything works best when I kill my web browser too. I have read here of TCPOptimizer but haven't looked into getting it yet...can't hurt and I'll do that later today. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-28 Thread cfraser
to the tt file. So I can switch between them quite quickly, less than 2 minutes includinging the reboots (one to get the daemons running again, then one for the new tt). -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-28 Thread cfraser
have little doubt the sonic sig of a particular DAC affects somebody's configuration preference. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-24 Thread cfraser
. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-23 Thread cfraser
the muffled/fuzzy stuff, something I wouldn't normally tolerate, in anticipation of when it would be good again. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-23 Thread cfraser
, speaking depth-wise, noticeable with Maggies anyway and nicely restored by the priority mods. I was sometimes surrounded by music more akin to from my turntable, except maybe even better and certainly much more convenient. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-23 Thread cfraser
be why I set it at that all those months ago...though I never did get the crackling or similar noise some reported when the buffer was too small (TT2.0). -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Touch Toolbox 3 Wireless wont work

2011-12-10 Thread cfraser
Sorry if I'm not following, but Modification WLAN: enabled means wifi is turned OFF. That would explain what you're asking, assuming you're asking what I think you're asking... :) -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-25 Thread cfraser
. [Not recommending anything here, just relating my experience.] -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-25 Thread cfraser
) think I'm full of it, they don't notice it at all. And I agree with them, in their systems. Probably most people wouldn't even notice it here, it's still very good, it only shows up (to me) in a direct comparison between DACs...it's trivial, but something to talk about... -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] help me find linear power supply for Touch?

2011-11-22 Thread cfraser
in audio (listening to music) as a hobby, otherwise it's like watching TV which IMO is hardly a hobby... -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] help me find linear power supply for Touch?

2011-11-21 Thread cfraser
in there, including extremely expensive audio gear. It's not like you absolutely need it. It is a refinement. I would not discount an otherwise good candidate PS because it doesn't have that choke. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] help me find linear power supply for Touch?

2011-11-19 Thread cfraser
in mind when they designed it. But no big choke in it... -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91383

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-16 Thread cfraser
access point in its current state is lightyears (soundyears?) beyond what I had when I first got it. Thanks. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-09 Thread cfraser
no doubt it sounded even better: it *is* better. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-09 Thread cfraser
lead, but I can almost guarantee your bank account won't thank you. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-03 Thread cfraser
Thanks for all your work Klaus. I have a long-time question that I still haven't figured out by myself: how do these buffer XRUNS get officially reported to me? Unofficially reported by ear... Thanks. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Separate Linear Power Supplies for the Touch and an Attached USB Drive?

2011-08-27 Thread cfraser
... -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89583 ___ audiophiles mailing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Separate Linear Power Supplies for the Touch and an Attached USB Drive?

2011-08-14 Thread cfraser
-- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89583 ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Separate Linear Power Supplies for the Touch and an Attached USB Drive?

2011-08-14 Thread cfraser
plenty of stuff from a certain country where the stated wire gauge is at least 1 gauge smaller than they state, sometimes 2... Anyway, the Touch + my drive seems to draw ~1A so no biggie, just an observation. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Very Long S/PDIF Cable to DAC?

2011-08-13 Thread cfraser
. In the meantime I found a very long coaxial audio cable I made for a sub that I don't really use anymore...that'll do for a test. I am short RF RCA connectors, that was the impediment to making a new cable for the Touch. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Very Long S/PDIF Cable to DAC?

2011-08-13 Thread cfraser
, and lipstick can make this pig a 4 beer interface. -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89561

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Separate Linear Power Supplies for the Touch and an Attached USB Drive?

2011-08-13 Thread cfraser
as a compromise? I am wanting to use the local USB drive for now. It is where I back up my FLAC files, and makes a nice portable little setup I can put in a small case (to take to other peoples' places). Thanks. -- cfraser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Very Long S/PDIF Cable to DAC?

2011-08-12 Thread cfraser
RF in my house. i.e. turn as much as possible off when listening to music, as opposed to background music. Hell, I even power off most of my routers then, the PSs for those are the worst/noisiest I've ever seen (Cisco). Installing better ones has been on my list for a while... -- cfraser