Thank you Hari!
I placed the wsdl in $JBOSS_HOME/bin and it worked fine. JBOSS's classloader
seems to be very picky in loading resources.
Thanks again,
Vivek
From: "Hari Lakshmanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Document-style web services
>From: "Hari Lakshmanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Document-style web servic
From: "Hari Lakshmanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Document-style web services
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:35:46 -0800
Thanks Joe, that does the trick.
Also I packaged my wsdl file web-inf/classes directory
Hello Har
Thanks Joe, that does the trick.
Also I packaged my wsdl file web-inf/classes directory
__Hari
-Original Message-
From: Joe Nall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document-style web services
On Mar 5, 2004, at 3:50 PM
On Mar 5, 2004, at 3:50 PM, Hari Lakshmanan wrote:
I mention in my wsdd file as given
...
doc-literal.wsdl
/doc-literal.wsdl
I have a / in mine, but I'm not sure it matters.
I get 500 Error when I access the wsdl page
(http://localhost:8080/axis/services/NotificationPort?wsdl)
Is the above
-
From: Vivek Nagulapati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Document-style web services
Hello Hari,
I get the same problem when I specify the custom WSDL. When I access the
WSDL using "?wsdl", my server log shows that it ca
s?
Thanks,
Vivek
From: "Hari Lakshmanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Document-style web services
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:50:51 -0800
I mention in my wsdd file as given
...
doc-literal.wsdl
I get 500 Error when I access
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 5:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document-style web services
If you specify a value for the wsdlFile in your element, this
file will be returned instead of the dynamically generated WSDL when a
user visits /axis/services
cc:
Subject: Re: Document-style web services
03/0
I'm pretty sure you can (in the service's
.wsdd file, maybe?) override Axis' return of the generated WSDL--instead
exposing your hand-built WSDL to any client that looks at your service.
Nick Remy
"Vivek Nagulapati"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/04/2004 08:28 PM
Please re
Hi Vivek,
You feel as if you need this URL:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?AxisProjectPages/WsdlFile
Don't waste all your effort having coded your own WSDL just to have Axis not show it.
Of course, you've said nothing about having actually developed your service with Axis.
You ne
Can you verify your deploy.wsdd contains these attributes?
style="document" and use="literal"
This should preserve the wsdl on the fly (as document based)
HTH
__Hari
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Nagulapati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PRO
ention document/encoded.
The current draft of the WS-I Basic Profile includes rpc/literal. It
disallows rpc/encoded.
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Sasha Lerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
oded arrays when style is "rpc"
Best regards,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: pFrancis X [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Document style web services
Let's take a standard purchase order scenario.
If I
"literal"). But there's no reason why you can't use literal
encoding with rpc style messages. Literal makes it much easier to perform
message validation or XSLT transformation.
Best regards,
Anne
> -Original Message-----
> From: pFrancis X [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
&g
vide an asynchronous API (built-in support for
non-blocking request/response messages using callbacks).
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Trond Hjelmaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Documen
chronous).
>
> Anne
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Francis Ho -- Enterprise Architecture
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:07 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Document style web services
> >
> &
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Document style web services
Document style web services are not inherently asynchronous. The synchronous
nature of a Web service is determined by the message exchange pattern
described in the WSDL Operation. If the service is defined as having an
input and
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Document style web services
>
>
> Document style web services is inherently asynchronous. Most of
> modern TRP/MS's
> such as EDIINT and RosettaNet (RNIF) use document-style services.
> It was found
> to be more a bit more scalable and flexible in
Document style web services is inherently asynchronous. Most of modern TRP/MS's
such as EDIINT and RosettaNet (RNIF) use document-style services. It was found
to be more a bit more scalable and flexible in dealing with legacy systems.
This is especially true as many of the legacy systems for ord
13980) This is something I
like about the .NET system because I want to be able to differentiate
between empty and null arrays.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:00
AM
Subject: Re: Document style web
services
> Having used both .NET and Axis I am afraid the
issues you mention are > proba
t it provides a simpler and more
efficient method to represent and transfer object-oriented data in XML, but
it limits flexibility.
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Faulkner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
time to contribute to axis, it's just a
reality.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 5:53 AM
Subject: RE: Document style web services
>
> Martin,
>
> Can you
er.)
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Jericho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 7:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
> Hi Tom
>
> I spent about a week playing around with axis to
> and extensibility, and in my experience developers can quickly get past
> the initial learning curve with some mentoring.
Could you please tell me where I can get a good Axis mentor or some good
tutorials ? :o)))
Tx
dovle
Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style web services
I'd personally disagree with this assessment of Axis as "not ready for
prime time", but I can understand the frustrations. There's de
ww.themindelectric.com/
Has free version too.
Cheers,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jericho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style web services
Hi Tom
I spent about a week playing around with axis
/
Has free version too.
Cheers,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jericho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style web services
Hi Tom
I spent about a week playing around with axis to see why it wasn'
;t apologise for not taking more time to contribute to axis, it's just a
reality.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 5:53 AM
Subject: RE: Document style web services
>
&g
: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PR
groups: ACORD
(insurance), TaxML, LegalXML, etc.
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 2:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
> Steve Loughran wrote:
>
the URL to the WSDL?
Michael Oliver
AppsAsPeers LLC
7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85747
Phone:(520)574-1150
Fax:(520)844-1036
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document sty
Steve Loughran wrote:
As an aside, does *anyone* use UDDI?
-steve
I'm personally really puzzled by the logic behind UDDI. As far as I can
see there's a huge gap between the reality of what can be done using
UDDI and the marketing concept behind it (which seems to be that you can
have your p
- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 18:44
Subject: RE: Document style web services
>
> - JAXM was launched in June 2000. Originally it was an
> API for ebXML. Only lat
- Original Message -
From: "Pae Choi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 00:32
Subject: Re: Document style web services
> And that's true ebXML has own stuff all that you mentined.
> Shouldn't those consi
del rather
> > than the UDDI data model.
> >
> > - Sun doesn't include JWSDL in the list of XML APIs on
> > www.jcp.org or in the JWSDP. (But then IBM lead the
> > JWSDL JSR, not Sun.)
> > (I apologize -- I've became very disillusioned
> &g
y) they've joined WS-I.
>
> Let's hope they stay engaged.
>
> Anne
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pae Choi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:51 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Document style
-I.
Let's hope they stay engaged.
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Pae Choi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
> Strange. ebXML MS is based on SOAP. Those two compleme
- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: RE: Document style web services
> Yes -- UPNP adopted SOAP a long, long time ago. (I think it was 0.9 --
those
>
ughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
> I've just been looking at the UPNP specs, and lo and behold, UPNP now
> mandates SOAP.
>
> http://www.upnp.org/download
I've just been looking at the UPNP specs, and lo and behold, UPNP now
mandates SOAP.
http://www.upnp.org/download/UPnPDA10_2613.htm
Looks to me from the examples that UPNP devices talk rpc/enc, maybe 0.9 or
1.0 soap at that. Which means if they shipped in any quantity, they would
ensconce rpc
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
The facet of WS-I that smells the worst is this business of *permanent*
board seats for the priviledged few. This seems bizzare, especially
given that Fujitsu, for example, is not a name that springs to mind
immediately when I'm thinking of web services. In fact, it looks
e
efficient method to represent and transfer object-oriented data in XML, but
it limits flexibility.
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Faulkner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Document style web servi
in a corner and pouting
because
> they weren't picked first.
>
>
> Anne
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:59 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Docume
Just want to say thanks for a nice write up. I had been
wondering myself since DAIS-WG's OGSA implementation of
a data mounting web service is document based, though
a competing group named Spitfire is RPC based.
If this could make its way into a FAQ that would be nice
(if it isn't already in on
ethod to represent and transfer object-oriented data in XML, but
it limits flexibility.
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Faulkner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Document style web servic
services
- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:21 PM
Subject: RE: Document style web services
It'd be nice if Sun got involved with Axis too.//
> Personally I think one of
ECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style web services
Eric, that is not quite correct. There are two different things, namely the
invocation style and the encoding style. The BP supports both rpc and
document invocation style, but only litera
Jericho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style web services
Dennis,
My experience is that Java2WSDL in Axis 1.0 has too many bugs to generate
document/literal style WSDL, but if you can generate it by some other means
Steve L wrote:
> It'd be nice if Sun got involved with Axis too.
The Axis team and the Sun JAX-RPC team have discussed this in the past. Sun does have
a history of moving RI's to the Apache project (c.f. Tomcat). I personally have met
many of the JAX-RPC guys and have great respect for them.
The facet of WS-I that smells the worst is this business of *permanent*
board seats for the priviledged few. This seems bizzare, especially
given that Fujitsu, for example, is not a name that springs to mind
immediately when I'm thinking of web services. In fact, it looks more
like the permanen
Original Message-
> From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> The whole point of document style is that your application gets passed
&
- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: RE: Document style web services
> From what I've seen, most vendors have designed containers that are
> compatib
AIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc:
Subject: RE: Document style web
services
pouting because
they weren't picked first.
Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Document style web services
>
>
>
> It may be old new
; Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:21 PM
> Subject: RE: Document style web services
>
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:21 PM
Subject: RE: Document style web services
> Personally I think one of Axis's most challenging issues is
> that Axis conta
and therefore ???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Document style web services
It may be old news, but its still true. Some of us are getting tired of
being made to jump
PROTECTED] cc:
t> Subject: RE: Document style web services
cc:
Subject: Re: Document style web
services
11
Anne,
Just a little addition to your comment on WS-I BP:
"WS-I has just published its Basic Profile
draft, which only supports document-style"
In the current published revision, the profile support both rpc
and document styles. It only restrict the use to literal.
eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
> Must be the 3.0 version of MSSTK that defaults to document,
> right, as it
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
> At the same time, I cant help treating WS-I mandates with some less
> serio
- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 14:25
Subject: RE: Document style web services
>
> Microsoft started the "document style by default" trend. Both MS SOAP
No idea; ask on ant-dev
- Original Message -
From: "Vidyanand Murunikkara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 15:06
Subject: RE: Document style web services
We have an implementation whereby we use java:RPC with
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Sosnoski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 15:41
Subject: Re: Document style web services
> I think WS-I has serious credibility problems, especially since it came
> out that M
e-
> From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
> Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
>
> >WS-I has just published its Basic Profile
> >draft, which only
Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
WS-I has just published its Basic Profile
draft, which only supports document-style. Pretty much every SOAP vendor is
involved with WS-I, so it won't be long before all SOAP implementations
generate document style by default.
I think WS-I has serious credibility problem
-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style web services
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Sosnoski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Nov
From: "Dennis Sosnoski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: Document style web services
> Hi Anne,
>
> Does Axis support automatic marshalling of document-style messages? I
> was under the impression i
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Sosnoski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
> Does Axis support automatic marshalling of document-style messages? I
> was u
nis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
> Hi Anne,
>
> Does Axis support automatic marshalling of document-style messages? I
> was under the impression it does
t using
multi-refs,
it's a better practice to use document-style.
Regards,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style web services
Hi Matt,
The whole point o
teral XML Schema. But if you're not using multi-refs,
it's a better practice to use document-style.
Regards,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style w
m: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Document style web services
>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> The whole point of document style is that your application gets passed
> the XML message payload
riginal Message-
From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Document style web services
Hi Matt,
The whole point of document style is that your application gets passed
the XML message payload as XML do
Hi Matt,
The whole point of document style is that your application gets passed
the XML message payload as XML document fragments. See the "message"
sample for an example of this. With a document style interface your
class would look like:
public class SomeXMLService {
public Element[] some
78 matches
Mail list logo
