Grabbing yesterdays snapshot (BBDB version 2.3 ($Date: 2001/02/19
23:10:27 $)), I decided to take another chance at make.bat.
My major problem is that the info file isn't generated. This can be
reproduced, so I'll try to look further into it. Any suggestions are
welcome.
I also removed the
On February 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I just tried it and it worked for me, x-faces in my bbdb buffer.
but I'm using an older version of bbdb, 2.00.06. XEmacs 21.2-b44.
Right. It's looking for a package I don't have locally, I guess, which
it shouldn't need any more judging by the VM
On February 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
more and more email goes to the non-primary address. And the bbdb
maintainers cannot even fix it, because it's a horrble ten-page mess
of vaguely documented gratuitously complex side-effectful elisp crud
that everyone is too scared to take a serious
Oh come now, that's not a very fair comparison. The functionality of
the completion function is really quite simple. It was just augmented
repeatedly without breaking out routines, until is is now an
unmanageable mess. It needs to be hacked with the byte saber.
One function that takes a
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Oh come now, that's not a very fair comparison. The functionality of
the completion function is really quite simple. It was just augmented
repeatedly without breaking out routines, until is is now an
unmanageable mess. It needs to be hacked with the
0 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
0 Ronan Waide URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ronan") wrote:
Ronan I'm not dumb. I do understand the merit of "no side effects,
Ronan please". I also understand the merit of "make things easy for
Ronan the user". For this latter reason, I think it is wrong to
[developer question, stop here if you're not familiar with bbdb internals!]
Anyone know offhand what I break by taking the company name out of
BBDB's hashtable? I can find one instance of setting it, and get-hash
calls that read it are only used to tell you you've got a duplicate -
which is
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Lemme get back to you on that. I managed to lock up Emacs while I was
trying some other random methods of loading it in, but an autoload
should work, I guess.
Waider.
Seems to work. Cheers.
Waider. And dammit, why didn't I think of that?
--
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As long as there are no defcustoms in bbdb-gui, that's fine. But if it
ever becomes more than a `load-to-activate' hook, it'll probably acquire
configurability, and that means defcustoms...
As it stands, there are defcustoms all over the BBDB source.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I want to use the auto-notes alist to extract X-face headers and
other information that I don't actually want to see in the article
buffer.
Hmm. Is there a hook floating around there that you can use to trigger
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm guessing you don't have a BBDB record for the jobalert system?
Thus BBDB says well I have this name, and I have four records that
seem to match it some how, but none of the nets match, what to do?
That's correct, nor do I want one. I do my
"RW" == Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RW On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So you actually have someone with the same _complete_ name as a
Company? Weird! :)
RW Well, it's not that. I have two or three people who work for
RW Stepstone in my BBDB. When I get emails from
Daniel Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I want to use the auto-notes alist to extract X-face headers and
other information that I don't actually want to see in the article
buffer.
Hmm. Is there a hook
PS Thomas, I can't mail your kodak address directly because kodak's
militant mail filter doesn't like hostnames with "dialup" in them.
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
I really need to reinstate the witty comments, dammit.
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
(sorry I can't find the message for credit purposes) responded with
the following for .emacs, which works:
(unload-feature 'bbdb-autoloads t)
(bbdb-initialize)
Good stuff. Thankfully, we've gotten rid of the problem for the next
BBDB release, but
Okay, this is officially irritating me.
1. Why is xemacs telling me that bbdb-autoloads is already loaded,
when I have nothing to load it in my .emacs?
2. Why is it a fatal error to load bbdb-autoloads twice? If this is a
"my version vs. your version issue, wouldn't it be more sensible
"RW" == Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RW [developer question, stop here if you're not familiar with bbdb
RW internals!] Anyone know offhand what I break by taking the
RW company name out of BBDB's hashtable?
Well, I ran into this when doing the 'duplicate-record' stuff.
The hash
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So you actually have someone with the same _complete_ name as a
Company? Weird! :)
Well, it's not that. I have two or three people who work for Stepstone
in my BBDB. When I get emails from stepstone's jobalert system, the
"real name" on the mail
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
"RW" == Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RW On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there a way to make bbdb-complete-name complete on AKA's and
Company name's?
RW Hmm, you can also do a bbdb-search and then just press 'm' on the
RW
"RW" == Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RW On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there a way to make bbdb-complete-name complete on AKA's and
Company name's?
RW Hmm, you can also do a bbdb-search and then just press 'm' on the
RW appropriate record. Not quite the same thing, I
Is there a way to make bbdb-complete-name complete on AKA's and Company
name's?
Thanks,
Albert
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Update of /cvsroot/bbdb/bbdb/lisp
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv17987
Modified Files:
bbdb.el
Log Message:
(bbdb-gui): new user option
Sam, with all due respect, I could do without you undercutting my code
without discussing it with
I must just be unlucky. Ronan's mail claiming that my grave
completion bug was fixed tempted me to update once again from the
nightly tarball. Yes - the completion works, but now the bbdb/rmail
interface is broken.
It looks rather as if bbdb/rmail-update-record expects
On Thursday, February 15, 2001, at 08:57 AM, Ronan Waide wrote:
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmm, I'll look into this. Unfortunately, I suspect that something will
only accept "" and not 'nil'. Which means I'll need to seriously uglify
(TM) the code to what wants what :(
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmmm, that's what testing is for.
Certainly. However, it helps if you specify the error rather than just
saying that there is one. BBDB is not an easy thing to test.
Both the errors should be fixed in current CVS (note: the tarball
doesn't get
Okay, I'm looking into this. There's more broken than that, and I
can't understand how I missed it. For now, you can set
bbdb-message-caching-enabled to nil and work away.
I tried that but still got a different error somewhere else.
Please post the error. I can't fix these
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It looks rather as if bbdb/rmail-update-record expects
bbdb-message-cache-lookup to accept two arguments; it used to, but
today it doesn't.
Okay, I'm looking into this. There's more broken than that, and I
can't understand how I missed it. For now,
* In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* On the subject of "Re: cvs ci 'bbdb/lisp bbdb.el,1.145,1.146'"
* Sent on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:38:37 +
* Honorable Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Update of /cvsroot/bbdb/bbdb/lisp
In directory
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It looks rather as if bbdb/rmail-update-record expects
bbdb-message-cache-lookup to accept two arguments; it used to, but
today it doesn't.
Okay, I'm looking into this. There's more broken than that, and I
can't understand how I missed it.
It looks rather as if bbdb/rmail-update-record expects
bbdb-message-cache-lookup to accept two arguments; it used to, but
today it doesn't.
Okay, I'm looking into this. There's more broken than that, and I
can't understand how I missed it. For now, you can set
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide stated:
That's correct, nor do I want one. I do my best to keep all manner of
crud out of my bbdb!
I *must* get that BBDB expiry hack updated for BBDB-2.2 so you don't
have to do that anymore...
--
`I put "Update To-Do List" on my to-do list. I'm never sure
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
Hmm. Is there a hook floating around there that you can use to
trigger this header unhiding, rather than me explicitly coding for
fiddling with people's displays?
The " *Original Article*" (note leading space) buffer contains the
full article,
32 matches
Mail list logo
