On Tue Jul 11 2017 Vincent Belaïche wrote:
> Just to mention that the code based on cl-progv which I have
> supplied does not work. I don't have any time to investigate why,
> so if you want to take my patch, please take the 1st one (that
> based on lambda).
I believe the purpose of cl-progv is
ent@hotmail.fr>
Envoyé : jeudi 29 juin 2017 15:05
À : Roland Winkler; BBDB info list
Objet : RE: bbdb-print.el lexical binding breaks bbdb-print-record
Ooops... there was some mistake in the code based on cl-progv which I supplied.
Just to be 100% clear about this alternative solution, it
> With lexical binding bbdb-print-record makes a void variable error
> on address variable.
As I told you before, I really didn't like the old / outdated code
used in bbdb-print.el, and I didn't want to invest in it anymore.
So I created a branch latex in the BBDB repository on sa
Hello Bob,
I did not have any problem with the Bbdb Print Tex Path. Certainly because on
my machine it was already customized with the usual customization interface
(M-x cutomize-variable...) to an existing path.
Problably, if not, bbdb-print.el should be robust to that and test
I also ran into this a while ago. I did a kludge fix in my initialization:
(setq bbdb-print-require t)
but of course this makes even blank records print, so it is not
exactly recommended for anything other than a quick and sloppy
workaround.
By the way I also had to do this as I was having
inding breaks bbdb-print-record
I've also made a fix for this, see github.com/barak/bbdb3 commit
7469e6e which is the tip of branch suggest-v3.x
It uses a slightly different mechanism to accomplish simila
9 juin 2017 13:24:53
À : Roland Winkler; BBDB info list
Objet : bbdb-print.el lexical binding breaks bbdb-print-record
Hello Roland,
With lexical binding bbdb-print-record makes a void variable error on address
variable.
Attached is a fix. I use a lambda expression to make the binding dynmi
Hello Roland,
With lexical binding bbdb-print-record makes a void variable error on address
variable.
Attached is a fix. I use a lambda expression to make the binding dynmical so
that bbdb-print-require can be evalled in the correct context. An alternative
fix would have been to use :
(cl
Eric Abrahamsen eric at ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I don't think the * prefix works if you're using M-x to call a
command. Maybe try binding `bbdb-print' to a key, then using the *
prefix with that key?
You're right.
Thanks.
--
Rene
Roland Winkler winkler at gnu.org writes:
On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
When using *M-x bbdb-print or even M-x bbdb-print I only get a TeX file
containing the current displayed record (the one my pointer is on in the
*BBDB* buffer).
All these commands use the prefix `*', see
rene jl...@yahoo.com writes:
Roland Winkler winkler at gnu.org writes:
On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
When using *M-x bbdb-print or even M-x bbdb-print I only get a TeX file
containing the current displayed record (the one my pointer is on in the
*BBDB* buffer).
All these commands use
Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net writes:
die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
my bbdb file is encoded in utf8 and when I try to print entries and
converting the resulting bbdb.tex file, I'm getting weird characters in
either the .dvi and .pdf file. How would you deal with
Roland Winkler winkler at gnu.org writes:
On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
When using *M-x bbdb-print or even M-x bbdb-print I only get a TeX file
containing the current displayed record (the one my pointer is on in the
*BBDB* buffer).
All these commands use the prefix `*', see
Hello list,
my bbdb file is encoded in utf8 and when I try to print entries and
converting the resulting bbdb.tex file, I'm getting weird characters in
either the .dvi and .pdf file. How would you deal with the situation?
Dieter
--
Best wishes
H. Dieter Wilhelm
Darmstadt, Germany
even gotten bbdb-print to work, it's always complained about
undefined control sequences or something. The tex code is very old, and
doesn't make any provisions for non-latin characters. Probably the
easiest stop-gap would be to change bbdb-print-prolog and
bbdb-print-epilog to wrap the whole thing
die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
my bbdb file is encoded in utf8 and when I try to print entries and
converting the resulting bbdb.tex file, I'm getting weird characters in
either the .dvi and .pdf file. How would you deal with the situation?
How are you creating the
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I've never even gotten bbdb-print to work, it's always complained about
undefined control sequences or something. The tex code is very old, and
I had this error trying to run the file through pdflatex, but it worked
fine with pdftex
On Sat Aug 30 2014 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
I've never even gotten bbdb-print to work, it's always complained
about undefined control sequences or something.
The lisp code should work fine. I made sure that bbdb-print-record
does not fail in the rare case that the value of an xfield is a
sexp
On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
When using *M-x bbdb-print or even M-x bbdb-print I only get a TeX file
containing the current displayed record (the one my pointer is on in the
*BBDB* buffer).
All these commands use the prefix `*', see the docstring of bbdb-print
On 22 May 2004 12:07:13 -0400 Kenneth Jacker wrote:
Kenneth A second mystery: after displaying all records, the created .tex
Kenneth file contains only, maybe, 20% of them. Why are these other entries
Kenneth not included in the pretty printing?
Maybe your cusomization?
,[ C-h v bbdb-print
Maybe I need yet *another* cup of coffee, but for the Life of me, I
can't figure out the entry ordering used by bbdb-print (in
emacs-21.2.1). This function -- bound to P -- generates a TeX file
which pretty prints all or some of the DB entries.
It starts out with a `B' section with persons whose
On May 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A second mystery: after displaying all records, the created .tex
file contains only, maybe, 20% of them. Why are these other entries
not included in the pretty printing?
I'd suggest you have a look at one that's been included and one that's
been left out
On , May 22, 2004 at 12:07:13, Kenneth Jacker wrote:
Maybe I need yet *another* cup of coffee, but for the Life of me, I
can't figure out the entry ordering used by bbdb-print (in
emacs-21.2.1). This function -- bound to P -- generates a TeX
file which pretty prints all or some of the DB
On December 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Note that Unicode cannot (yet?) represent all the characters that
Emacs can represent.
Really? How is this the case? Or more to the point, what's the set of
characters in Emacs that can't be represented in Unicode?
Cheers,
Waider.
--
I tend to not
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On December 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Note that Unicode cannot (yet?) represent all the characters that
Emacs can represent.
Really? How is this the case? Or more to the point, what's the set of
characters in Emacs that can't be represented in
Sergei Pokrovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess (and you do, of course) the idea is to free data from the
limitations of a coding-systems, to make it more versatile, so that I
be able to address a person in an appropriate charset (sometimes I
have occasions to write to one same person in
it. But printing
works via TeX, and I know zilch about TeX and other coding systems. I
think we could define all non-ASCII sequences using something like
\catcode`ß=\active\chardefß=FF. Or we could start using something
like the inputenc package for LaTeX (which we cannot use as-is for
now, because bbdb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Großjohann) writes:
Really? How is this the case? Or more to the point, what's the set of
characters in Emacs that can't be represented in Unicode?
In Emacs, Latin-1 ä and Latin-2 ä are two distinct characters. I
think in Unicode there is only one ä.
There was much
Alex Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, this time I have a patch.
Committed. :)
Now for the documentation...
Alex.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
the fields that contain $ signs (eg. X-Faces),
and elide the Japanese entries... But first this is TeX and not
LaTeX... and then this is still a suboptimal solution. Does anybody
know of any other bbdb-print solution? If not, I will just use
ps-print-buffer... It looks ugly, but at least the data
Coded my own solution and wrote it all up:
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BbdbMulePrinting
Alex.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek Presents Now!
Green Lasers, Hip Geek T-Shirts, Remote Control Tanks,
On January 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bbdb-print-elide still appears in the texinfo documentation and the
comments in bbdb-print.el. Global substitution time in both files?
Is it worth using make-obsolete-variable when this sort of change
happens?
Thanks...
peace happiness,
martin
hi all,
how can i sort bbdb records according to the company field, say,
and then have the company entry (common to some of the records)
as a separator (instead of the first letter of the name)
when calling bbdb-print?
thanks for help,
tomy
--
Signature for mail groups
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still, though. I would have expected cvs diff to do the
right thing. It's just plain irritating that it doesn't.
I'm pretty sure I've successfully applied patches created with cvs
diff.
It's the combination of current working directory and correct -p
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Kai Großjohann stipulated:
Note that different patch installations seem to use
different default values for -p. So on some installations, patch
foo is the same as patch -p0 foo, whereas on others, it's
patch -p1 foo. Strange. So maybe you just want to
On November 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So if you don't specify -p{something}, all the patches get applied to
files of that name in the current directory, which probably don't exist,
and if they do, are probably the wrong file. This strikes me as a quite
useless and completely annoying
On November 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Small patch I needed to get bbdb-print work:
Ta. Applied, will be in CVS shortly.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
A one question geek test. If you think it's funny, you're a geek. Seen on a
California license
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On November 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Small patch I needed to get bbdb-print work:
Ta. Applied, will be in CVS shortly.
I think, the indent parameter is used when bbdb-format-address is
called for screen formating and not for printing. So I like
Okay, I agree with that. Thanks.
Waider. No, I don't use a printer if I can help it :)
On November 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On November 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Small patch I needed to get bbdb-print work:
Ta. Applied, will be in CVS
:
Waider (klortho.waider.ie) $ patch ~/tmp/bbdb/bbdb-print-patch
can't find file to patch at input line 5
Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
and I have to manually feed it the filename. Now, this is obviously
annoying, but reading the manual to patch doesn't help me a whole lot
On November 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Note that this is also in my patch which I sent a few days ago. The
patch added the bbdb-print-net defcustom. In order to test it, I had
to fix the same bug. :)
Mea culpa :) I have backlog of stuff here that I'm working through at
the moment, and I
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
patch gerds.patch
I get:
Waider (klortho.waider.ie) $ patch ~/tmp/bbdb/bbdb-print-patch
can't find file to patch at input line 5
Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
[...] Actually, from reading the manual page I get
On November 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Of course, the best would be, I call diff inside the lisp directory.
Sorry for the confusion.
Well, no. There's a way of doing this that works from the root of the
tree as well, but my reading of the patch man page leads me to believe
that you need to
Small patch I needed to get bbdb-print work:
Index: lisp/bbdb.el
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/bbdb/bbdb/lisp/bbdb.el,v
retrieving revision 1.171
diff -u -r1.171 bbdb.el
--- lisp/bbdb.el2001/10/14 19:47:20 1.171
+++ lisp
On Monday, September 10 2001 13:56:48, Mark Moll wrote:
In the latest cvs version of bbdb, bbdb-print is broken because
bbdb-field-shown-p is undefined. A related ChangeLog entry is
This should be fixed in the current CVS verrsion.
Robert
In the latest cvs version of bbdb, bbdb-print is broken because
bbdb-field-shown-p is undefined. A related ChangeLog entry is
2001-07-31 Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-field-shown-p): Changed the defsubst to a defun.
(bbdb-format-record-elided), (bbdb-format
I'd like to use bbdb-print in 2 column mode, but with each column
only 16cm tall -- so they will fit in my notebook.
Is there a way to tell tex or bbdb-print how to do this?
thanks
--tony
Hello folks,
Has anyone hacked bbdb-print to output filofax (~ 95 x 175 mm) pages?
Thanks.
Stan Norton
--
North Sea Consultingvoice: +1 508 465-9774
10 52nd. Street fax
The bbdb-print distributed with bbdb 1.48 was not the latest version.
The people who reported problems to me should try the latest version; I
believe that your bugs have previously been fixed.
I put the newest version for anonymous ftp in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:pub/bbdb-print-2.3.shar, in plain
49 matches
Mail list logo
