--- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) "Mr. Brigham Young"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Q: How do you make a Pentium III perform like a 386?
> >> A: Use Java Apps
> >
> > Boy have you bee
>> It was my understanding that it was based off of Blackbox.
>
> Teach me to open my fool mouth... if it's based off of Blackbox, it's only
> in spirit, 'cause even *I* can tell the two of them don't look anything
> like each other.
>
> Like Gnome
;> further reading reports that Sun's marketing group has declared
> > >> GNOME/Sawfish
> > >> the only truly supported Linux desktop environment. Not KDE/Kwin, not E,
> > >> Sawfish. Period. Under Solaris they support Sawfish and CDE.
> > >
>> GNOME/Sawfish
> >> the only truly supported Linux desktop environment. Not KDE/Kwin, not E,
> >> Sawfish. Period. Under Solaris they support Sawfish and CDE.
> >
> > Except that Gnome has switched to Metacity as of 2.0, which is Blackbox (or
> > used to
t; pixels and such) - *Covering my head from flying coffee cups/other
> easily accessible/throwable desktop objects* =).
>
it is definately different with each jvm.
> So I've tried three different JVMs now, none of them likes to cooperate
> with Blackbox. Also worth mentioni
10
pixels and such) - *Covering my head from flying coffee cups/other
easily accessible/throwable desktop objects* =).
So I've tried three different JVMs now, none of them likes to cooperate
with Blackbox. Also worth mentioning, all applications I've tried are
quite heavy, and needs a bit of loading time. I think I remember hearing
someone talk about this.
On 25-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) "Mr. Brigham Young"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Q: How do you make a Pentium III perform like a 386?
>> A: Use Java Apps
>
> Boy have you been using the wrong Java Apps.
>
Maybe once they get running. Init
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) "Mr. Brigham Young"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Q: How do you make a Pentium III perform like a 386?
> A: Use Java Apps
Boy have you been using the wrong Java Apps.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Q: How do you make a Pentium III perform like a 386?
A: Use Java Apps
> >Using the four-letter "j" word seems to be a good way to make
> >Shaleh use the four-letter "f" word. ;)
=
--
"R. Brigham Young II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Senior Systems Analyst, CAUSMIS Research Group
Dept. of Mater
, not E,
>> Sawfish. Period. Under Solaris they support Sawfish and CDE.
>
> Except that Gnome has switched to Metacity as of 2.0, which is Blackbox (or
> used to be), so exactly where is that going to put Sun? Not that Sun cares
> about Linux, of course. :)
>
metacity was always a clean start as far as I know.
Grabbing it now.
Sawfish and CDE.
Except that Gnome has switched to Metacity as of 2.0, which is Blackbox (or
used to be), so exactly where is that going to put Sun? Not that Sun cares
about Linux, of course. :)
Now there's an interesting point... are the window problems people are
seeing duplicable un
On 25-Jul-2002 Roy Wood wrote:
>>One of the posts mentions "SwingSet2 demo". Does anyone know what this is
>>and
>>where I can get it?
>
>
> It's a demo showing off the Swing GUI toolkit. Dunno about Sun, but IBM
> includes it with their SDK. Pretty nifty, I guess. Demonstrates that
> Jav
>One of the posts mentions "SwingSet2 demo". Does anyone know what this is
>and
>where I can get it?
It's a demo showing off the Swing GUI toolkit. Dunno about Sun, but IBM
includes it with their SDK. Pretty nifty, I guess. Demonstrates that
Java is still kinda sluggish compared to a pure
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:03:29 -0700 (PDT) "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From the bug database on another improper window handling bug:
>
> Evaluation
>
> twm is not currently supported.
> x@x 2001-01-09
Isn't that like saying that X isn't supported?
--
Jamin W. Co
>From the bug database on another improper window handling bug:
Evaluation
twm is not currently supported.
x@x 2001-01-09
ary about this on the bug pages. Many people noting that
KDE and GNOME have a similar market share.
I am a little surprised to hear the IBM's jre is also showing these issues as
many people recommend running it or blackdown due to Sun's refusal to fix
things. Damn near all of the fvwm bugs
On 25-Jul-2002 Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just experienced this bug using IBM's newest JRE v1.3.1. It does *not*
> happen so frequently with IBM's JRE as with Sun's, though, but still, it
> happens.(Again, dialogs are the problem)
>
> Just wanted to point this out, so we know it doesn
> Nope, I have not tried this wm. Just visited the web page where it
> belongs. I could give it a whirl later today, perhaps. Will tell my
> observations of how it behaves with java. (I'll try JRE's from Sun and
> from IBM)
>
there were reports that fvwm was exhibiting similar symptoms.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>>Yup, I can certainly understand that. =). It seems like a very hard bug
>>to squash, and doesn't even seem like Blackbox's fault AFAIK. Still, I
>>find it important, simply because many people use Ja** applications, and
>>secondly because it doesn't happen with oth
> Yup, I can certainly understand that. =). It seems like a very hard bug
> to squash, and doesn't even seem like Blackbox's fault AFAIK. Still, I
> find it important, simply because many people use Ja** applications, and
> secondly because it doesn't happen with other WMs (at least the 3, or 4
Chris Grossmann wrote:
>Note:
>
>Using the four-letter "j" word seems to be a good way to make
>Shaleh use the four-letter "f" word. ;)
>
>On July 25 (12:45 EDT), Øyvind Stegard wrote:
>
>
>>Hello
>>
>>I just experienced this bug using IBM's newest JRE v1.3.1. It does *not*
>>happen so freque
Note:
Using the four-letter "j" word seems to be a good way to make
Shaleh use the four-letter "f" word. ;)
On July 25 (12:45 EDT), Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just experienced this bug using IBM's newest JRE v1.3.1. It does *not*
> happen so frequently with IBM's JRE as with Sun's, t
Hello
I just experienced this bug using IBM's newest JRE v1.3.1. It does *not*
happen so frequently with IBM's JRE as with Sun's, though, but still, it
happens.(Again, dialogs are the problem)
Just wanted to point this out, so we know it doesn't only happen with
Sun's java stuff.
--
Øyvind S
and
> nothing else.
> I haven't run gdm since a long time, but this is the way kdm is working.
The other thing you can do is just use the gnome session, but set
blackbox as gnome's window manager, through the gnome control center...
you still have gnome start up, and panels etc
Le Samedi 13 Juillet 2002 10:31, Marco Fioretti a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 10:04:54 at 10:04:54AM -0500, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > What sessions are available for selection in the menus of the GDM screen,
> > or are there any?
>
> I'm at home now, will check monday, but as far as I remembe
> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 13:05:43 -0400
> From: Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Blackbox web site]
>
> "Mr. Brigham Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Originally I understood the use
Well I am glad to see everyone is excited about manpages ,
Before I get started in earnest, let me know if there is anything that you
think needs coverage. PLEASE reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so everyone
gets a chance to read your comments.
Shaleh has made the following comments regarding the manp
--- Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Mr. Brigham Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've started using Nix because it seems more inclusive.
>
> How's "Nix" (or "*nix") more inclusive than "Un*x"?
> None of these includes Linux, HP UX, AIX, IRIX, *BSD, Solaris etc. ?
> ;-)
The s
so out of touch with reality that it defies explanation. I
find it hard to believe that anyone in the potential user group of
blackbox would find the M$ or Micro$oft convention unprofessional, let
alone offensive. It is such a classic haxor a+4 than one has to
laugh.laugh.laugh.
What would truly be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> People are simply way too sensitive. I like to think of the internet
> as the Wild West in a way. People say whatever they want, and it's up
> to us to realize that we have every right to disagree, but *no* right
> to censor the views of others.
This has nothing to
In mho..
People are simply way too sensitive. I like to think of the internet as the Wild West
in a way. People say whatever they want, and it's up to us to realize that we have
every right to disagree, but *no* right to censor the views of others.
In fact, I actually enjoy this freewheeling
Hi All,
Before I get started in earnest, let me know if there is anything that you
think needs coverage. PLEASE reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so everyone
gets a chance to read your comments.
Shaleh has made the following comments regarding the manpages.
0.65-release
1) not all features are documen
"Mr. Brigham Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've started using Nix because it seems more inclusive.
How's "Nix" (or "*nix") more inclusive than "Un*x"?
None of these includes Linux, HP UX, AIX, IRIX, *BSD, Solaris etc. ?
;-)
> Originally I
> understood the use of "Un*x" was to protect ag
On Mon, Jul22,02 09:34, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > You might want to add a short mailto-link at the bottom of the
> > index-page.
> >
>
> yeah, I suppose I should.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
DC
--
Derek Cunningham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Human beings act intelligently only after they have
exhau
--- Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The difference is that "M$" contains a judgement. "Un*x" or it's
> variants are neutral. It's intended to summarize the various flavors of
> UNIX-like operating systems with one word.
I've started
>
> You might want to add a short mailto-link at the bottom of the
> index-page.
>
yeah, I suppose I should.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22-Jul-2002 Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > Somebody sent this to me; thought you guys might find it
> > interesting.
> how is it you received this? You happen to be the first address on
> the screen shots page so if she chose that link that shows a
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always thought referring to the company as M$ was like referring to Un*x, it
> just avoided the explicit name and the need to pay someone (-:
The difference is that "M$" contains a judgement. "Un*x" or it's
variants are neutral. It's intende
On 22-Jul-2002 Mike wrote:
> I don't know what the big deal is. I'd just leave it, who cares, not worth
> the time/thought/effort. If people are going to get all freaked out over
> something like this, let 'em.
>
Cygwin is a more accurate depiction anyway so that is what the webpage now says.
To:, :/, then I wrote back to Jan to apologize. :P
Figured I better not Cc everyone on the blackbox list for my whole day's
correspondence. ;)
On Monday, July 22, 2002 at 09:04AM, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>>
>> While I can see their point, they strike me as a bith of a ze
On 22-Jul-2002 Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Somebody sent this to me; thought you guys might find it interesting.
>
how is it you received this? You happen to be the first address on the screen
shots page so if she chose that link that shows a certain lack of understanding.
>
> While I can see their point, they strike me as a bith of a zealot with the
> request. Anyway, doesn't Blackbox require Cygwin in order to operate on
> MS OSes? If so, why not just change the reference to Cygwin?
>
true, I should just say Cygwin.
I always thought refe
I've followed Eugenia's writing for some time. *She* was often
considered a zealot when her husband was working for Be... but I would
also consider her a "fighter of the good fight". So I am curious; what
would be the "proper" way to deal with the Microsoft "issue"?
I've reffered to them as Mi
gn something completely
>foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
>Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 23:27:53 -0700
>From: "Eugenia Loli-Queru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Blackbox web site
>
>In this page: http://b
filthy to reffer to Microsoft as M$,
> > ESPECIALLY when the project you are developing is actually running on
> > that platform.
>
> While I can see their point, they strike me as a bith of a zealot with the
> request. Anyway, doesn't Blackbox require Cygwin in order to ope
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:25:20 -0400 Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Somebody sent this to me; thought you guys might find it interesting.
>
> From: "Eugenia Loli-Queru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Blackbox web site
>
> In this page: http
I, the reader and user of Blackbox, deserved to see such a
behaviour on an OSS site for a project that I use on *both* my Windows and
on my Linux boxes.
No hurt feelings.
Thank you,
Eugenia
---
Editor-in-Chief at http://www.OSNews.com
--- End Message ---
On Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:52 PM
Wilbert Berendsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
next year I would like to hand over some little things to someone
>else. I'm looking for:
>* a new Dutch NLS maintainer
>* a new Blackbox Manpage maintainer!
>please email me personally after around
s
you are fluent in English.
The good news is that when the library for bbtools becomes available it will
have easy to use i18n support just like blackbox does.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>On 18-Jul-2002 Øyvind Stegard wrote:
>
>
>>Hi again,
>>
>>I noticed that Norwegian language support is missing from the Blackbox
>>distribution. Perhaps I could do some translating, since Norwegian is my
>>mother t
On 18-Jul-2002 Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I noticed that Norwegian language support is missing from the Blackbox
> distribution. Perhaps I could do some translating, since Norwegian is my
> mother tongue.(If the Blackbox maintainers are interested in this)
>
&g
Hi again,
I noticed that Norwegian language support is missing from the Blackbox
distribution. Perhaps I could do some translating, since Norwegian is my
mother tongue.(If the Blackbox maintainers are interested in this)
I'm afraid I would need some instructions on how to do it, since
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 11:31:22 at 11:31:22AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> It sounds like FrameMaker was designed for Solaris where the X server is always
> running in 24bit mode. Simply having someone change the X setup on your
> machine so it ran in 24 instead of 16bpp mode would have f
On 15-Jul-2002 Marco Fioretti wrote:
> FYI, this is the conclusion of the story. Any comment/explanation/
> further trick arer appreciated, as I confess I don't understand
> completely why the solution below works.
>
It sounds like FrameMaker was designed for Solaris where the X server is always
>
> If this could be wrapper into a separate class, the #ifdef would be in
> one place only and therefore not really disturbing the source (except
> for the font code). Plus it would simplify the rest of the code a bit
> by remove some duplicated code - even if you don't plan to implement AA
> s
FYI, this is the conclusion of the story. Any comment/explanation/
further trick arer appreciated, as I confess I don't understand
completely why the solution below works.
It works, however.
Thanks to everybody.
Marco
#
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:16:13 +0200
> Although I don't use it anymore, I did need to use FrameMaker
> at my former job. The symptom that you describe was duplicated because
> Frame on Solaris could not support 16-bit color (in my case).
> At higher (or lower) color depth it was ok.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 15 July 2002 5:46 am, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:53:02 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > On 15-Jul-2002 Mike wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I updated Johannes Winkelmann's 0.65.0alpha2 aa patch, origin
Hello again,
first of all, THANKS A LOT to everybody who helped me
to run blackbox on my GNOME office workstation.
Summary:
CTL ALT BSP just goes back to gdm
Failsafe and .Xclients methods both work, I chose
the second.
Now another showstopper. I am posting it here because
somebody on
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:53:02 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 15-Jul-2002 Mike wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I updated Johannes Winkelmann's 0.65.0alpha2 aa patch, originally from
> > http://www.hta-bi.bfh.ch/~winkj/. Works pretty well :)
hehe, nice... actually I have a patch for beta2 a
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:53:02AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> AA support will be interesting. I know people want it but it is XFree86 4.x
> specific. Which means more ifdefs. Brad also believes AA is a crock and a
> waste of time. Personally I have not seen much benefit either way.
On 15-Jul-2002 Mike wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I updated Johannes Winkelmann's 0.65.0alpha2 aa patch, originally from
> http://www.hta-bi.bfh.ch/~winkj/. Works pretty well :)
>
> 40k is a bit much to send out to a list I figure, so just grab it from my
> site: http://www.gozer
Hey,
I updated Johannes Winkelmann's 0.65.0alpha2 aa patch, originally from
http://www.hta-bi.bfh.ch/~winkj/. Works pretty well :)
40k is a bit much to send out to a list I figure, so just grab it from my site:
http://www.gozer.org/c/c/blackbox/blackbox-0.65.0beta2-aa.diff
Mike
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 02:10:44 at 02:10:44AM +0200, Gerrit Hoetzel wrote:
> >
> > What happens if you try to kill X with CTL+ALT+BKSP
> > or similar methods ?
>
> Marco seems to be using gdm which (by default) restarts the X server.
>
> I dont't see a way of killing gdm (which runs as root).
>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 03:54:04PM +0200
Marco Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here at work I've been finally given a PC with Linux Red Hat 7.2
> and blackbox-0.61.1-2. Distro and/or blackbox version cannot be
> changed because of company policies to
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 06:08:43PM -0400
Scott Furt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Keep in mind that I don't need GNOME at all, I just got it with the PC,
> > and, again, requests to change the "default" install, i.e. to mess with
> > gdm or such, are going to be ignored, for the more or les
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 18:08:43 at 06:08:43PM -0400, Scott Furt wrote:
>
> What happens if you try to kill X with CTL+ALT+BKSP
> or similar methods ?
>
Ach, I didn't think about it at all... :-(
I'll try it monday, it would really solve it for good!
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
Marco Fioretti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here at work I've been finally given a PC with Linux Red Hat 7.2
> and blackbox-0.61.1-2. Distro and/or blackbox version cannot be
> changed because of company policies too shameful to discuss them
> here. Also, I have no root password.
&
eone else may have a better grasp on this than I.
> 2) From your script
> > wait $wmpid
>
> what is the meaning of that line?
Someone on this list (sean?) suggested this for my .xsession file. It's
a technique so that I can start working before all my little toys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 13 July 2002 4:06 am, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > I didn't know about openbox. In the office I have stock RH 7.2, which
> > doesn't have gnome 2 has it? I'll try it at home, though.
>
> open
On Saturday 13 July 2002 05:06 am, you wrote:
> So basically if you want a specific feature not in blackbox and going over
> to fluxbox scares you then openbox may be then solution until blackbox
> acquires your feature.
Just out of curiousity, why would Fluxbox scare anyone?
--
D.
>
> I didn't know about openbox. In the office I have stock RH 7.2, which
> doesn't have gnome 2 has it? I'll try it at home, though.
>
openbox is a fork of blackbox 0.62.1. They basically did a lot of the same
work as the 0.65 series (STL, cleanups) as well as new
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 10:04:54 at 10:04:54AM -0500, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> What sessions are available for selection in the menus of the GDM screen,
> or are there any?
I'm at home now, will check monday, but as far as I remember it says
"last, failsafe, default, gnome".
I tried yesterday t
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 14:14:12 at 02:14:12PM -0700, paul wrote:
> Here's what I do on the RedHat/Gnome system at school:
> - Log into to Failsafe Xterm mode. This gives me an xterm with no window
> frame, but if I move the mouse over it, I can enter commands.
> - Run an executable script nam
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 23:08:34 at 11:08:34PM +, David Barr wrote:
> hi,
>
> if you are using gnome2 you could use openbox (
> http://openbox.sunsite.dk/ ) which is net_wm /gnome complient, and
> basically blackbox(+), plus it's pretty spiffy. if you are using
>
Marco Fioretti declaimed:
> Hello,
>
> here at work I've been finally given a PC with Linux Red Hat 7.2
> and blackbox-0.61.1-2. Distro and/or blackbox version cannot be
> changed because of company policies too shameful to discuss them
> here. Also, I have no root pas
> Marco
yeah... basically... but hey, it gives you the ability to run what you
like... so the RAM usage is a small price to pay. Also bear in mind that yes
there are two X sessions running... but on the first X session, there isn't
a whole lot there (gdm CAN'T take up THAT m
> Well... you COULD try to press ALT+F(2-6) to see if they've configured GDM
> to run on all the terminals (Since this tends to be quite tricky, there's
> high probability that they haven't), in which circumstance you should just
> be able to login via text console, then run startx as per nor
re
> code like ...
>
> for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
>... stuff ...
> }
>
> was good, and the "i" variable was only valid within the scope of
> the for block. Did you build blackbox with this flag?
ooh, i was COMPLETELY unaware of that flag. let
On Fri, Jul12,02 15:54, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here at work I've been finally given a PC with Linux Red Hat 7.2
> and blackbox-0.61.1-2. Distro and/or blackbox version cannot be
> changed because of company policies too shameful to discuss them
> here. Also,
Hello,
here at work I've been finally given a PC with Linux Red Hat 7.2
and blackbox-0.61.1-2. Distro and/or blackbox version cannot be
changed because of company policies too shameful to discuss them
here. Also, I have no root password.
The problem: the PC has been configured
>What I would like to hear first is that after simply
>exiting blackbox, starting another wm, and running
>JBuilder (or any offending application) everything is
>fine.
Done. Here's the poop:
- With xfwm (part of Xfce), JBuilder works perfectly well-- i.e. dialogs
are the ri
>What version of Jbuilder are you using? I have hade similar problems
>with Jbuilder5 myself (but not 100% sure it was with blackbox).
I'm using JBuilder6. I noticed a post from someone else using JBuilder7,
and they were experiencing the same problems.
-Roy
On 11-Jul-2002 Nils Grundback wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:23:33 -0400
> "Roy Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Anyone else working with JBuilder and Blackbox?
>>
>> With other window managers, JBuilder's dialogs are okay, but with
>&
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:23:33 -0400
"Roy Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone else working with JBuilder and Blackbox?
>
> With other window managers, JBuilder's dialogs are okay, but with
> Blackbox, they open way too big (as in much larger than the actual
On 11-Jul-2002 Roy Wood wrote:
>>this is the baffling bit. Blackbox is doing EXACTLY what
>>the program asked it to do.
>
> Weird. Anyone with any sort of familiarity with another wm have any idea
> what they are doing that is different?
>
>
> -Roy
I have re
>this is the baffling bit. Blackbox is doing EXACTLY what
>the program asked it to do.
Weird. Anyone with any sort of familiarity with another wm have any idea
what they are doing that is different?
-Roy
> WM_NORMAL_HINTS(WM_SIZE_HINTS):
> program specified location: 278, 241
> program specified size: 1054 by 743
> window gravity: NorthWest
this is the baffling bit. Blackbox is doing EXACTLY what the program asked it
to do. These h
Can you do the same in a different wm? Maybe twm?
Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> OK, maybe this would help a little.
> Launched JBuilder and did xprop and xwininfo on the "Tip of the Day"
> dialog that appears first (greatly and incorrectly oversized)
> Blackbox versi
OK, maybe this would help a little.
Launched JBuilder and did xprop and xwininfo on the "Tip of the Day"
dialog that appears first (greatly and incorrectly oversized)
Blackbox version is 0.65b2, X screen resolution is 1024x768 (24bit).
I did not move, resize or touch anything before d
Roy Wood wrote:
>Anyone else working with JBuilder and Blackbox?
>
>With other window managers, JBuilder's dialogs are okay, but with
>Blackbox, they open way too big (as in much larger than the actual screen
>size).
>
>
>Any thoughts on what's up? Is BB
On 11-Jul-2002 Roy Wood wrote:
> Anyone else working with JBuilder and Blackbox?
>
> With other window managers, JBuilder's dialogs are okay, but with
> Blackbox, they open way too big (as in much larger than the actual screen
> size).
>
>
> Any thoughts on wha
Anyone else working with JBuilder and Blackbox?
With other window managers, JBuilder's dialogs are okay, but with
Blackbox, they open way too big (as in much larger than the actual screen
size).
Any thoughts on what's up? Is BB providing some hinting for window sizes
that i
>
> would i be asking too terribly much to ask that the the variable scope rules
> meet that of plain old C so that blackbox will cleanly build on SGI kit using
> MIPSpro as the compiler?
>
> there were only, i think maybe 4 or 5 instances of this happening, so it's not
>
d cope.
>
> would i be asking too terribly much to ask that the the variable scope rules
> meet that of plain old C so that blackbox will cleanly build on SGI kit using
> MIPSpro as the compiler?
>
> there were only, i think maybe 4 or 5 instances of this happening, so it's
hello,
i've managed to get blackbox to build using MIPSpro on my Octane. this is very
very good, since MIPSpro generates binaries that kick gcc generated binaries
all over the place. :)
anyway, it turned out to be a lot easier than i thought it was going to be.
edit config.h and d
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wilbert, since I am not on the sylpheed list please be sure this makes
> it to them.
I've forwarded the message to the Sylpheed list.
--
Jamin W. Collins
>>
>> but the window will also be moved down and right (exactly the borderwidths
>> of title bar and left border). When calling sylpheed repeatedly, its
>> window moves down all along.
>>
>> I think it's a bug in the sylpheed code, but maybe related to b
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry declaimed:
> On 09-Jul-2002 Rachel Collins wrote:
> > I was thinking of starting a Blackbox-HOWTO for The Linux
> > Documentation Project. I looked around on sourceforge and
> > the bb homepage and didn't see one (or similar
> > doc
ow to feasibly set it in Sylpheed). A good number of lists
add custom headers with their submission address. Some common ones are:
X-BeenThere:
X-Loop:
X-Mailing-List:
List-Post:
Blackbox already sets the X-Loop header, it just doesn't have the complete
submission address in it.
--
Jamin W. Collins
1 - 100 of 1413 matches
Mail list logo
