Well, for what it's worth, attached are some patches to help get things
started. I've cleaned up what I could from the 1.1.4 patches (not
including the gcc patch) but the java patch still needs work.
Many sections from the java patch no longer exist in OOo2, but I used
'grep -lr' to scan the
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 06:58:27PM -0700, Jeremy Byron wrote:
>
> Not Archive::Zip, unless I just missed it.. Compress::Zlib, yes.
Hrmm, so it is. Thanks for the clue. :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfr
Archaic wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Jeremy Byron wrote:
Requires Perl Module: Archive::Zip.pm and it's dependency Compress::Zlib
- http://bike-nomad.com/perl/
FYI: BLFS covers the download and installation of those modules.
Not Archive::Zip, unless I just miss
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Jeremy Byron wrote:
>
> Requires Perl Module: Archive::Zip.pm and it's dependency Compress::Zlib
> - http://bike-nomad.com/perl/
FYI: BLFS covers the download and installation of those modules.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security fr
David Ciecierski wrote:
Seriously, has anyone got any grips on building 1.1.5 or even 2.0 beta?
I'm going to fiddle with 2.0 beta2 tonight, we'll see what happens :-)
A few things to get you started with OOo2.0b2.. I haven't had time to
get very far with it yet.
Requires Perl Module: Ar
I should point out that if you are doing weird things like putting
variables in your PS1, those variables won't be expanded unless you use
double quotes (which is what I've always done). The reason I mention
this is that 2 hours later it was pointed out to me that the time never
updates on the prom
Seriously, has anyone got any grips on building 1.1.5 or even 2.0 beta?
I'm going to fiddle with 2.0 beta2 tonight, we'll see what happens :-)
--
David Ciecierski
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:04:13PM +, Lennon Cook wrote:
> See: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/02/msg01159.html
I fail to see how that link is supposed to help. It is dealing with
debian's suid manager.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Supertux needs SDL_mixer to play sounds, it may also need smpeg. Did you
install SDL_mixer?
Yes, I've had both since the beginning. A while ago I was checking if
smpeg did not use gstreamer (then broken gstreamer would explain
supertux exiting), but it doesn't. It's just slightly worrying that
See: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/02/msg01159.html
--
Lennon Victor Cook
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Well, now that I'm ready to build OpenOffice, I see that both the stable
and development versions of "the book" have the directions for 1.1.4.
C'mon it's been ten whole days since the release. :-)))
Seriously, has anyone got any grips on building 1.1.5 or even 2.0 beta?
I'll be more than hap
Archaic wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Dan McGhee wrote:
Yeah, I know. But if you put the output of this command in someone's
profile, wouldn't the time be displayed in, say, EDT for that user? A
quick scan--not a thorough read--in my references gave me that impression.
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Dan McGhee wrote:
Oh BTW, since kernel headers are installed separately now, is there any
reason to keep the kernel source tree around?
Once it works properly, no. With 2.6, rebuilds after altering the
.config are a lot more sensible, so a minimal change can be built
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Dan McGhee wrote:
> >
> Yeah, I know. But if you put the output of this command in someone's
> profile, wouldn't the time be displayed in, say, EDT for that user? A
> quick scan--not a thorough read--in my references gave me that impression.
Now I see wh
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:42:36PM -0500, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
> I thought I remembered some words in LFS or BLFS about removing sources,
> but, except for the clean-up in LFS, I can't find anything. Am I just
> paranoid or should I turn 'rm -R ' loose. I figure I should save
> "config.cache."
Archaic wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:29:34PM -0500, Dan McGhee wrote:
Could you set `date %Z ` in .bashrc or .bash_profile
for each user? Or PS1 for each user in this format?
%Z doesn't actually set or change anything. It just causes the timezone
value to be shown.
Yeah, I kn
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Archaic wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:29:34PM -0500, Dan McGhee wrote:
Could you set `date %Z ` in .bashrc or .bash_profile
for each user? Or PS1 for each user in this format?
%Z doesn't actually set or change anything. It just causes the timezone
value to be shown.
I'm trying to do some long overdue clean-up in getting ready to build
Open Office--3 gig --> yikes. I have just about that left on my LFS
partition. However, I can free up 2.1 G if I remove the firefox,
thunderbird, gimp, qt and xorg sources.
I thought I remembered some words in LFS or BLFS
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:29:34PM -0500, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
> Could you set `date %Z ` in .bashrc or .bash_profile
> for each user? Or PS1 for each user in this format?
%Z doesn't actually set or change anything. It just causes the timezone
value to be shown.
--
Archaic
Want control, educat
Archaic wrote:
I need a computer to log everything as UTC. I need the users to be able
to choose their own timezone. Easy enough. I cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC
to /etc/localtime and set TZ in ~/.bash_profile to EST. The problem is
with the bash prompt which I have set to display the time.
Accord
David Ciecierski wrote:
Some success at last. Just as I thought it was just me & my frame of
mind that wasted me several desperate hours. As you may remember,
alsamixer run properly, but alsaconf didn't, same for supertux, totem
and other higher-level apps. Hence I was certain it has to be a pr
Some success at last. Just as I thought it was just me & my frame of
mind that wasted me several desperate hours. As you may remember,
alsamixer run properly, but alsaconf didn't, same for supertux, totem
and other higher-level apps. Hence I was certain it has to be a problem
with kernel / alsa
David Ciecierski wrote:
>> Might want to hold on OOo, unless you are doing the 2.0 branch. I'm
>> just about done with 1.1.5 + gcc4.
>
>
> Yes, it's beta2. It seems to have problems with jdk1.5 (beanshell
> component in particular), although last night I couldn't be bothered to
> properly invest
I need a computer to log everything as UTC. I need the users to be able
to choose their own timezone. Easy enough. I cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC
to /etc/localtime and set TZ in ~/.bash_profile to EST. The problem is
with the bash prompt which I have set to display the time.
According to info bash.
Might want to hold on OOo, unless you are doing the 2.0 branch. I'm
just about done with 1.1.5 + gcc4.
Yes, it's beta2. It seems to have problems with jdk1.5 (beanshell
component in particular), although last night I couldn't be bothered to
properly investigate. I'm trying to get it to compil
David Ciecierski wrote:
>> First, has this sound card worked before in previous LFS with udev?
>
>
> This box run on Mandrake 10.1 for the past year, ie. udev-030.
>
>> lets remove the 15-alsa.rules file and make certain that is
>
>> not where the problem lies, it is a relatively new addition.
andy:~$ ls -l /dev/snd
It's exactly the same then! Interesting...
Does totem work for root?
No, it gives an error message about not being able to find the chosen
output. I'm now compiling the kernel with patched ALSA drivers -
2.6.12.5 had 1.0.9rc2, current stable is 1.0.9b. Looking at ch
David Ciecierski wrote:
Yes, all users (well, apart from pkg-users) are in the audio group. Even
root. So what device nodes do you have on your system? Would be grateful
if you could `ls` it...
andy:~$ ls -l /dev/snd
total 0
crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 0 2005-09-24 17:03 controlC0
crw-rw-
Please ignore the above post... ALSA-drivers are kernel modules, and I
already have kernel support for my sound card. Silly.
--
David Ciecierski
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfrom
Gosh, just realised by looking at install.log that ALSA comes with
drivers for Yamaha, but 744 chipset - mine is 724, which apparently
requires the alsa-drivers package! Hope I'll be able to report [SOLVED]
in a couple of minutes...
--
David Ciecierski
Want control, education, and security fr
The device nodes you posted before look almost identical to mine and my
system works fine. If Totem and Supertux can't access the audio devices,
have you added yourself to the audio group?
Yes, all users (well, apart from pkg-users) are in the audio group. Even
root. So what device nodes do yo
> configure: error: You need at least libxml 1.8.8
> for this version of gnome-print
I believe you've installed libxml2, as described in the book. But as far
as I know you'll need to install libxml(1) for the gnome 1.4 libraries -
and the lack of it is precisely what gnome-print configure compl
In straight BLFS (without hints), it strictly isn't - it's
> mostly a matter of you don't *need* to be root to build it,
> and it is therefore good practice not to be.
Exactly. It's basically added security - by building a package as
non-root you elliminate the risk of dodgy / malicious config
Does anyone know why xterm gets setuid root?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
-rws--x--x 1 root root 304515 Sep 22 04:18 /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 08:37 +, randhir phagura wrote:
> Unknown library `xml'
> checking for xmlNewDoc in -lxml... Unknown library `xml'
> yes
> Unknown library `xml'
> checking for libxml (gnome-xml) version >= 1.8.8... Unknown library `xml'
> configure: error: You need at least libxml 1.8.8 f
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 02:35 +, Lennon Cook wrote:
> gtk-sharp is failing to install with the following error:
> >>>
> /usr/bin/gacutil /i glib-sharp.dll /f /package gtk-sharp-2.0 /gacdir /usr/lib
> ERROR: Could not create package dir file.
> <<
> It seems quite obvious that this is a permission
David Ciecierski wrote:
What is the problem?
The problem is that no application can use the sound card, and alsactl
is the prime example of that (please refer to my original post). The
issue started with Totem not launching and complaining it cannot find
the requested sound output + supertux
Hello !
Building BLFS svn-20050922, Kernel 2.6.12.5, gcc-4.0.1.
Having gtk+-2.8.3/glib-2.8.1/pango-1.10.0/atk-1.10.1/cairo-1.0.0
control-center-2.10.1 fails to build :
Reported error :
In file included from /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangofc-font.h:25,
from /usr/include/pango-
Hi,
Sorry for bombarding the List with my various install problems.
Actually, this is part of a series of problems I am facing installing gnome
1.4 libraries. Never faced any problems in kde or gnome2.
I am getting the following configure error in gnome-print-0.37.
'libxml-1.8.17' has been in
On 9/24/05, randhir phagura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it required that building of a package be done as an unprevilged
> user?
In straight BLFS (without hints), it strictly isn't - it's mostly a
matter of you don't *need* to be root to build it, and it is therefore
good practice not to be
Hi David,
David Ciecierski wrote:
so if you're installing a new package as another unprivileged user (which
you >normally do when following the hint.)
Why is it required that building of a package be done as an unprevilged
user? I saw this indication in the Book too ("Now as root user issue t
Hello !
Building BLFS svn-20050922, Kernel 2.6.12.5, gcc-4.0.1. Some feedback :
1. libgnome-2.10.0 fails to compile :
Reported error : "gnome-gconf.c:33: error: array type has incomplete
element type"
Can be corrected with (see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302071) :
diff -Naur li
42 matches
Mail list logo
