fall for the big
sissy. Kick me off already!
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* David Brin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Please drop dead.
Eventually, perhaps.
> You are a bona fide asshole and I want to hear from you never again.
I can keep playing these games as long as you can. I was going to let it
drop, but you obviously don't want it to drop. You want to play games.
inded me why I opted out.
No problem, I will leave you out of any future discussions that involve
reality.
[Rest of off-topic rant deleted...]
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
.
Woud you care to revise this statement?
> The shoe fits. These monsters have most of the world's media shilling
> for them.
>
> Nu? feudalists did that in most human cultures. We should be
> surprised they are doing it now?
Talking about shoes fitting, this ranting sounds a lot
tive solution to global warming that is cost competitive with other
solutions to important world problems, then I am sure that Lomberg would
be all for it.
Shilling for the neocons? Feh. You have conspiracy theory on the brain,
Brin.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
http://tinyurl.com/aom39
http://www.money.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2005/06/13/ccpers13.xml&menuId=242&sSheet=/money/2005/06/13/ixfrontcity.html
Personal view: Forget global warming. Let's make a real difference
By Bjørn Lomborg (Filed: 13/06/2005)
Last Tuesday, 11 of the world
* Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks
> on-list.
>
> If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of
> your being placed on moderation will be non-zero.
It seems we have more nattering ninnies! But a new bre
How disappointing! Julia started a whining thread just tailor-made to
draw the nonsense-spouting whiners, like flies to shit.
My left middle finger is raring to go, it needs excercise. Come on,
where are the cry-babies when you need them? What happened to the
posturing pudding heads? Nick, Warren,
number of whiners and nonsense
spouters' emails (not automated kill file, at least not yet). Guys (you
know who you are) feel free to pile on here and whine and exchange
nonsense. Maybe it will occupy you enough to stop distracting the few
remaining people who are interested in reasonable d
ollars.
The main difference that I see between the Democrats and the Republicans
is that the Republicans spend more and tax less, and the Democrats spend
more and tax more. Granted, the latter is better than the former, but
hardly frugal.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
easible flavor. Although she did endorse Bush, which
subtracts a few points...but her blog is well worth reading.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
http://www.janegalt.net/blog/archives/005309.html
May 11, 2005
Regulating risk
There's a debate that we should be having in this country, about risk,
but aren't, because everyone's trading scare stories about Social
Security.
In a follow-up post, Matthew Yglesias argues with Alex Tabarrok about
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/11/opinion/11mill.html?pagewanted=print
New York Times, May 11, 2005
Wanted: Responsible Demagoguery
By MATT MILLER
You'd never guess from the Democratic hysteria that President Bush's
plan to "progressively index" Social Security is an idea we liberals
may one da
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=printfriendly&id=2627
House Committee on Ways and Means
Statement of The Honorable Lawrence B. Lindsey, President and Chief
Executive Officer, The Lindsey Group, Fairfax, Virginia
Testimony Before the House Committee on Ways and Means
May 12,
* Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It also fails even to construct decent logical arguments. Interactions
And another low S/N poster heard from. This thread may set some records.
Dave, at least, is funny. Accusing someone of not constructing decent
logical arguments. Ha!
__
* Gary Denton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There is never any factual content he indicates he is disagreeing with
> and
Never? There is something stated as fact which is incorrect. The Brin-L
archives provide ample evidence.
Of course, if Gary hadn't used the word never, but "rarely", then Gary
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hmm. Sounds like the weighting function which is supposed to make
> the random reply sound at least a little like it makes sense is not
> working properly . . .
Sounds like it is adapting itself to be like your program...
_
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 06:53 PM Sunday 5/8/2005, Erik Reuter wrote:
> >* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> At 04:22 PM Sunday 5/8/2005, Robert J. Chassell wrote:
> >> >Eliza: Is it because of your life that
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 04:22 PM Sunday 5/8/2005, Robert J. Chassell wrote:
> >Eliza: Is it because of your life that you are going through all this?
>
> [NameWithheld]: It is because you are afflicted by the virus of religion
> that you say that.
Is it because of you
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sometimes I suspect the existence of an Eliza-like program called "Don
> Rickles" which generates a random selection of insults in response to
> any post that almost sound as if they are coming from a human being .
> . .
Maybe the same-tired-old-jok
And then, of course, we have Warren, who apparently values political
correctness, false politeness, and his own emotions over anything real
and useful like knowledge, clear thinking, or taking time to learn about
a subject before spouting an opinion on it.
One of the few Brin-L posters with a sign
n fit with his party line.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
ds and
longer-term projects that are expected to create improvements in the
future, as opposed to the way the term is used by people managing
savings portfolios).
I expect the NIPA guide could tell you exactly what is included, if you
are interested in finding more details:
http://www.bea.doc.g
chive do, since you may have to wait a while on
heaven...
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Erik Reuter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Productivity data is from:
>http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/OPHPBS/2/Max
>
> You can see a graph of productivity growth here:
>http://erikreuter.net/econ/ophpbs.png
>
> *I did not include years 1953, 1961, 1
* Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thanks for reminding me: the other pathetic logical fallacy that you
> frequently engage in is ad hominem attacks.
Awww, poor Dave. Can't think. Likes to whine. Aw.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.eri
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Repetition does not establish veracity.
You have repeatedly established what your thoughts are worth, Ronn.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On May 5, 2005, at 6:44 PM, Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> >>The statements "There is [a/no] God" matter to people so much so
> >>that
> >
> >^ some ^ foolish
>
some
^
foolish
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Erik Reuter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What causes productivity growth? Capital deepening (i.e., more
> machines per worker, better equipment, etc.) and more skilled (or more
> efficient) workers.
From 1947 through 2004 (the years for which I have productivity data),
average a
e
equally statements of faith.
But "there are babelfish" and "there are no babelfish" are not equally
statements of faith.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
rplane, robot, computer, etc. Over that time the US
averaged only a bit over 3% real GDP growth rate.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* d.brin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Today, I registered to vote as a Republican
And if that does not help, he could always join a church...
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
hieved for the entire period -- this is
similar folly to that of speculators during the 1999-2000 stock market
bubble.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
n that, and "the Democrats policies
will consistently result in stronger growth if applied continually". Or
any other of a large number of similar "explanations". So the conclusion
you are looking for from such an ambitious extrapolation will be likely
most others are not so fortunate. More co-dependency. Which I am
sometimes guilty of, too, but it would be the worst enabling behavior
for me to ignore all the religious nonsense that scrambles people's
thinking. The invisible pink unicorns told me to help out here. God, I
hate them!
-
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Or the behavior of one who simply refuses to be an enabler to spammers.
No spam. Pay attention.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 12:53 PM Saturday 4/30/2005, William T Goodall wrote:
> >http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/04/30/dawkins/
>
>
> Cute (though hardly original) use of Photoshop, but who has a cost- and
> spam-free link to the actual article?
That would be e
r one thing, anyway. This is
more hilarious than the 3 Stooges!
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
orrectly, then is not difficult to identify
who may have cheated. The only way to avoid being identified this way is
to copy from someone who correctly answers all the questions.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I'm quite sure that you don't know what I actually mean.
I'm quite sure that NOBODY knows what you actually mean. Nobody, not
even Nick. Because it is NONSENSE. Damn that brain-destroying religion!
--
Erik Reuter http
* Frank Schmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> However, the fact that no system is perfect doesn't mean no system is
> better than the current one.
Who claimed otherwise? The problem is with deciding criteria. You didn't
explain what criteria you were using to decide what is "better", and
why.
> A
There has been a great deal of work on voting science over the past
~200 years. Unfortunately, the conclusions are "it depends". Is the
system you describe better than the current system? It depends on what
is considered important.
Here is a summary of vote aggregation methods and some ways to mea
nse (or just pathetic denial)
every time someone explains what you are saying is nonsense.
By the way, nice fire analogy, Gautam. If that wasn't clear enough,
then it is hard to imagine what could be. Patience may be a virtue, but
recognizing a lost cause is surely one, too!
--
Erik Reuter
hat manual labor costs $3 in the poorest nations,
then manufacturing switches from manual labor to automation. I said
nothing about the gap between rich and poor nations. That was your
statement, wrongly attributed to me.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
closer to wage parity is not what I said. Sufficiently high
absolute minimum standard of living would do it, even if the gap between
the top and bottom increases.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It seems paradoxical, if Africa has starvation, why sell food. But, the
It does seem odd. But what if most poor countries are net importers of
food? The subsidies obviously hurt the food exporters, since subsidies
depress prices, but if the country as a
* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:42:47 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote
>
> > Yeah, how could you ever in a million years have guessed that the
> > function for calculating a factorial was called "factorial"?
>
> I'm having trouble
* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:51:09 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote
>
> > Incredible! Your inaction while wishing for a magical solution to
> > drop from heaven extends even to simple programming tasks!
>
> No, no, no. I'm wishing for m
* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:29:57 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote
>
> > > Scipy, a Python module that uses native libraries, seems to
> > > perform quite well at such things once it one muddles through the
> > > documentation to f
rial(10,
exact=1) and it took more than a minute on my machine. Also, 1! was
only a couple seconds, so it looks like it is much worse than linear
time. I'd hate to see what happens if you try 5M!
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
__
ate the results)
On the other hand if 8 minutes is too quick for you and you'd rather
wait several days for Mathematica to calculate 5M!, then that is of
course the "best solution" if it makes you feel better about all the
money you spent on Mathemati
ma:
http://maxima.sourceforge.net/screenshots.shtml
There are several other free programs that may be better depending on
what you are trying to do, but Maxima is the most general purpose free
math system that I know of.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
__
s you just boot from the
CD and you are running the OS from the CD, without having to install
the OS on your hard drive. When you are done, just take the CD out and
reboot and you will be back running your usual OS on your hard drive (or
whatever).
--
Erik Reuter http:
* Erik Reuter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> 5565709! has 35 126 456 digits and took 7 minutes 57 seconds to
Oops, that's what I get for trying to type instead of copying. As you
see below, it is actually:
> 35126452
digits.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.
ude
using namespace std;
using namespace GiNaC;
int main()
{
ex poly;
poly = factorial( 5565709 );
cout << poly ;
return 0;
}
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
like you. I couldn't ignore this thread
any long, since I've been called by the invisible pink unicorns to
spread the word about the horrors of religious brainwashing.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
ion...aha, they have weapons of mass
dest--er, biological weapons? Uhh, germ warfare, yeah, salmonella,
that's the ticket! Send in the UN inspectors, er, I mean send in the
health department inspectors! If the inspectors aren't shown the
salmonella post-haste, we invade! Justice will be serv
* Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Erik Reuter wrote:
> >* Robert Seeberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >>There is a Just Lunch doctrine.
> >>At least where I work there is.
> >>Just lunch..no nooner..just lunch.
> >
> >
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Welcome!
Ronn's our welcome wagon for gmail trolls. Good job, Ronn.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Robert Seeberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There is a Just Lunch doctrine.
> At least where I work there is.
> Just lunch..no nooner..just lunch.
Better to just skip just lunch and go straight to the chocolate cake and
fudge brownies...get your just desserts!
--
Erik Reut
a ? meaning the inverse factorial function. Is there anyone
besides Alberto who has used ? to mean the inverse factorial?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
a big difference.
A slightly different question:
Which is more resistant to transformation to the other, a democracy or a
dictatorship? Or are they about the same?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Erik wrote:
> > Why didn't you respond to the questions I posted last night?
>
> Because I did. :-)
Wrong again, Dan. In your head doesn't count.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
* Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> >* Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >>And where are you whenever someone gets the "its/it's" thing wrong?
> >>Nowhere to be found! Shees
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sure, maybe the horse will learn to sing. :
Much more likely than that.
> A lot longer. But, that has nothing to do with the question at hand. You
Wrong again, Dan.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreut
immortality will be
developed in my lifetime. Maybe not, but my options are open.
> Many people would think those are good goals only as long as someone
> else is paying for them.
Perhaps. If everyone acted that way, how long (if ever) would it take to
achieve those goals?
--
Erik Reuter
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 10:57 AM
> Subject: Re: New Pope?
>
>
> > * Dan Minette (
* Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> And where are you whenever someone gets the "its/it's" thing wrong?
> Nowhere to be found! Sheesh!
Its not easy to joke about that when ones own mistakes caused a dog to
lose it's tail in a horrible punctuation acciden
only way to settle the question.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
210 lbs.
Bats: Right
Throws: Right
Pos: RP
Born: October 2, 1974, Sonoma, CA
Full Name: Douglas Alan Nickle
College: UC-Berkeley
Experience: 3 years
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
ore
> > successful strategy than the lack therof.
>
> Well, all we have is history to judge this q
Wrong again, Dan. You keep writing that, but repeating it will not make
it true.
Doug:
Nickle \Nic"kle\, n. (Zool.)
The European woodpecker, or yaffle; -- called a
dom or
oppression?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
protest too much, now I am wondering whether
Gautam was right:
> As to your assumptions about my motives ("seems meant only to be a
> poor attempt to make me look..."),
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Gautam Mukunda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> We all know how opinions that differ from today's orthodoxy are
> treated here, so why should today be any different?
Actually, Dave just doesn't pay attention very well.
--
Erik Reuter http://ww
* Ronn!Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:18:31 -0600
That was 18 minutes and 30 seconds late! For shame, Ronn!
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Robert Shiller has been championing GDP-linked bonds for years. I agree
that they are a good idea, both for developing countries and for mature
countries.
GDP-linked bonds also provide a partial answer to the question
I posed some time ago, "how does an entire generation save for
retirement"? Buy
ut the window.
I didn't make the mistake of engaging you in a discussion about
religion. I just made a comment with no intention of discussing with
you. I will not be making the mistake, either.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.m
mmy Acquinis...who was _the_ most influential doctor of the
> church (with Augustine a close second) almost 1000 years ago.
Galileo may have had a different opinion. Your revisionist religious
apologist attitude is really depressing.
--
Erik Reuter http://www
r the church's numerous distortions that is a more
serious problem.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Ray Ludenia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hardly seems likely. Dan is from the famous "shut up and calculate"
> school after all.
Huh? Could've fooled me.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
ould be a theory of real observables once we probed a bit deeper. But,
> there was a big development in the mid-60s that eliminated hidden variable
> theories from serious consideration. That will be in the next installment.
Ah, EPR coming? Are you saving these for yo
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/0,,SB02071090881840,00.html
CAPITAL
By DAVID WESSEL
Social Security Deserves Better Than Another Partisan Brawl
March 17, 2005; Page A2
President Bush's campaign to create private Social Security accounts
and to stabilize the popular retirement sy
* Trent Shipley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [message without BRIN: in the subject]
Unless you Bcc'd him or otherwise directly emailed him, it is unlikely
Brin will read what you wrote.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
http://www.investorsinsight.com/article.asp?id=jmotb030705
The Mystery of the Awful Economists
By Barry Ritholtz
2005 March 7
John Mauldin's "Outside The Box"
I've been making a fortune lately. (No, I don't own any Google IPO
shares). Each month, I've been betting on the outcome of the Non-Farm
y at 1.9e11 is
lambda = 1.5e-12 cm = 1.5e-14 m
Energy = h c / lambda = 1.3e-11 J = 83 MeV
Search the web for something that emits 83 MeV photons!
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
;ve read some of their stuff on decoherence
> a few years ago and found it to be rather interesting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan M.
>
>
> ___
> http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/
http://www.economist.com/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Story_ID=3690442
Arab satellite television
The world through their eyes
Feb 24th 2005 | CAIRO, LAAYOUNE, QATAR AND RIYADH
From The Economist print edition
With 150 channels to choose from, Arabs are arguing, comparing and
questioning as never before.
* Erik Reuter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This reminded of an article I just read. I don't have an online link,
> but it is from _Consumer Reports On Health_ newsletter, March 2005.
> Here's an excerpt:
>
> "Daily doses of the dietary supplement coenzyme Q10,
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It would clearly be the lady with the alligator purse.
Everybody forgets about that poor alligator...
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Swiss and Belgian researchers divided 42 people with recurrent
migraines into two equal groups. Half took 100 milligrams of CoQ10
three times a day for three months; the rest took a placebo. Ten of
those taking the supplement compared with only 3 taking a placebo had
at least a 50 perce
* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I guess I'll give you a chance to discuss this reasonably again
Will you really? Go suck an egg, Nick.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
are possible to assist with that situation.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
quid stock and bond market, and then invest in
all of them, proportional to the size of the market.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Doug Pensinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:02:14 -0500, Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >* Doug Pensinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >>But you see, part of your argument is that because the money isn't
> &
her.
We might be able to figure it out, but we won't be able to pay for it.
Many people seem to think that medical care should just be given to
those who need it. Perhaps we should assign a full-time personal doctor
and full-time nurse to take care of everyone in the
exist.
Are you really saying that most Americans are delusional and of the
opinion that wishing makes it so?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
ved") to provide people with
the retirement most people would like. That is rather the point of a lot
of the threads here.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
ooks like a step in the right direction to
me. The current Medicare all-you-can-eat system is the real problem.
When so many things are free, there is much less incentive to be thrifty
in one's medical consumption.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't care to discuss anything further.
You call what you were doing "discussing"? Ha!
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
1 - 100 of 2176 matches
Mail list logo
