Anyone know if the new versions are going to be testable? Just installed
CUCM8 this morning, there are many new features.
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Thank you, was working through this same problem in Volume 2 Lab 2. The
gatekeeper syntax in the Proctor Guide is missing the IP address, I'm
assuming is needed because HQ router is also an H323 gateway. The BR2
router could register when I specified the loopback on HQ but not the
subinterface.
Is there a way to accomplish inbound call block based on ANI on an MGCP
gateway, perhaps with a blocking route pattern?
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
No, that won't work. The ANI-specific routing starts at the CUCM side, so
in order to send it to UCCX (which can subsequently route based on ANI), all
calls would have to be sent to UCCX by default. The problem starts further
upstream (unless there's a way to filter a call based on ANI on the
at your company.
One more reason of my love for H323 :)
Ash
Nara Shikamaru wrote:
additional load for your server? You mean for the UCCX server? Yeah,
that sounds about right since all inbound calls would have to be scrutinized
by the script.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:33 AM, o
28, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
Recently I've been working on configuring phones for non-cisco devices
and have been forming some questions in my mind I'm hoping to bounce off of
someone. So, if you haven't had to worry about it in the past, configuring
Cisco
easier with regards to the phone port configuration and again getting
the same results,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
Hi Otto,
As I was working through setting up the phones on the Juniper switch,
I guess the fact that I needed to configure
Recently I've been working on configuring phones for non-cisco devices and
have been forming some questions in my mind I'm hoping to bounce off of
someone. So, if you haven't had to worry about it in the past, configuring
Cisco phones for non-Cisco devices can sometimes take some extra effort on
with this.
Brgds,
*Roger Källberg*
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
--
*Från:* Nara Shikamaru [shikam...@kagadis.com]
*Skickat:* den 21 december 2009 17:40
*Till:* OSL Group
*Ämne:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Configuring holiday schedule in CRS
Has
Guys, we need a forum like NetPro so that we can award points to helpful
responses.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
Roger/Otto,
Thank you very much, this is a great help.
2009/12/22 Otto Sanchez o...@ipexpert.com
Hi Shikamaru,
You might
The subject of LLDP came up briefly in boot camp and I am interested in
knowing;
1 - Cisco's stance on their phones supporting LLDP?
2 - Which phones do support it? (I can't find a matrix that indicates the
compatibility)
3 - Has anyone run into any esoteric issues using LLDP with Cisco phones?
Has anyone configured a holiday schedule script for CRS? I'm looking for a
document that explains the format that the .xml file needs to be in and some
other general information. Any help would be appreciated.
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information
I'm trying to backup my lab's CCX server but get stuck at 40 percent with
the progress Waiting for wizards to complete. It currently runs on
desktop vmware, which shouldn't be the issue since I have a CCX 7
implementation at a lab at work on ESX and am able to do backup and restores
no problem.
In the Proctor Guide (pg 236) it say that we need to add the CUCM user
account to the User Group. There is no group called User Group, I'm
assuming what is meant is that we need to add the user to Standard CCM End
Users. However, in the screenshot it implies that the end user account is
added to
Thanks, Arun.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Arun Kumar arunv...@gmail.com wrote:
you need to add these users to Standard CTI Enabled Users Group.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
In the Proctor Guide (pg 236) it say that we need to add
are
using mlppp. Once you apply it to both sides, conectivity should be
reestablished,
HTH,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
After applying autoqos syntax on the PVC going to BR2, I find that I am
not able to commit no class-map match-any
I'm working through configuring BACD. I have it working but I've got some
questions.
1) When I apply the following syntax;
*application
service queue flash:bacdprompts/app-b-acd-2.1.2.2.tcl
param number-of-hunt-grps 2
param aa-hunt2 3210
param aa-hunt3 3003
param queue-len 15
param
Okay, figured out 3, obviously syntax needs to be added for drop-through
mode to work which will fullfull the requirements of question 11.3. Please
scratch my third question off.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
I'm working through configuring BACD
CALLIndSs_SErviCe
Default
CTAPP
clid_authen_col_npw
fax_hop_on
aa
ipsla-testcall
app-b-acd-aa
clid_authen_npw
session
app-b-acd
clid_authen_collect
clid_col_npw_3
WORD Name of the service/package*
Confusing.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam
: *Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:34:09 -0500
*To: *Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
*Cc: *OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ILT Lab 1 Page 64 - Translation Pattern
typos, errors?
I am not seeing this lab on page 64, can you double check lab and page?
On Sat
After applying autoqos syntax on the PVC going to BR2, I find that I am not
able to commit no class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Remark because it is
being used. Also, I lose connectvity to BR2. Is this a normal part of the
process? I'm able to make all of the remaining changes, but my
6-10 haven't been released yet.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just checking to see if anyone knows if the Vol 2 workbooks and proctor
guides are complete. I only have sections 1-5 in my download area. Also,
awhile back I saw mention that
It's there, look again.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Talmadge Almand t...@ipexpert.com wrote:
I am not seeing this lab on page 64, can you double check lab and page?
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Nara Shikamaru
shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
Has anyone tried adding
, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nara Shikamaru
shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
Okay, I think I got this worked out finally. This is a long module (it
was designed to be completed over the course of a week at the 5 day boot
camp). Some of the sections are not complete because some steps are
combined in later
Has anyone tried adding the translation patterns from ILT Lab 1 to CUCM? Am
I wrong, it looks like there are two problems. One, the pattern is in their
twice
\+^[1]!
Also, CUCM doesn't like it and complains, Add failed. The circumflex must
appear within brackets
--
-Shikamaru
, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
wrote:
This question always seems to pop up in different forms on this
mailing list. I've had this troubhle in the past and managed to overcome
it
before but I am perplexed at it now.
HQ phones can dial SCCP phones at BR2. They can not dial SIP phones
Communities at
www.IPexpert.com/communities
http://www.ipexpert.com/communitieshttp://www.ipexpert.com/communities
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com wrote:
Otto,
How can this be a codec problem if calling the BR2 SCCP phones works?
On Tue, Nov 17
have
been a lot better if each section's solutions were done independently. It
would make certain steps redundant but would also make the solutions more
understandable.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
I've run a debug on the BR2 router, nothing's coming
I'm very confused. In this question, we are told very explicitly in bulltet
3 that we are not allowed to use the default technology prefix sytnax. But,
in the final configuration file for the gatekeeper it's actually used;
*gatekeeper*
* zone local US ipexpert.com*
* zone local Spain
is using the default tech prefix , which
one takes priority or what happens.
I need to read up on the gatekeepers again.
*From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nara Shikamaru
*Sent:* Tuesday, 17 November 2009 8:59 AM
This question always seems to pop up in different forms on this mailing
list. I've had this troubhle in the past and managed to overcome it before
but I am perplexed at it now.
HQ phones can dial SCCP phones at BR2. They can not dial SIP phones at
BR2. In the past, the recommendation has been
The question asks to configure Unicast MOH server publisher as the primary
with MOH on the subscriber as secondary, but the solutions show the
subscriber server being configure for multicast. Is this another mistake or
is there more to the question than I'm understanding?
--
-Shikamaru
Does anyone know of 3rd party phones for CUCM that can handle features like
extension mobility and phone services?
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
I ran into this too, you need advanced IP services on the switch.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:47 AM, vineet sanghi vineet_san...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi Group,
I am trying to do auto QOS on 3750 and getting different results with
different IOS versions. I have tested on ver 122.50 122.35
Can
I'm working on sending full E.164 to a 911 phone, have configured my
transformation pattern to expand the internal phone's 5001 to +12123945001.
Dialing works, number is being expanded, but the + character is missing. Is
this nornal?
--
-Shikamaru
___
Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
--
On Oct 22, 2009, at 20:27, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com wrote:
Can someone tell me which SRNDs are available in the lab? Also, it's my
for the Cisco CCIE
RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 2:24, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com wrote:
Mark,
I think someone mentioned that the following resources are available
Can someone tell me which SRNDs are available in the lab? Also, it's my
understanding that the link http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html is
accessible via desktop on the lab PC. Can someone confirm?
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
--
*From: *Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
*Date: *Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:28:13 -0700
*To: *Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com
*Cc: *OSL Group ccie_voice
Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
--
*From: *Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
*Date: *Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:28:13 -0700
*To: *Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com
*Cc: *OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call flow
I've joined two clusters together (for a migration at work, not for lab
obviously) and would like to know if anyone has an answer to a question I
have. In a normal call in a single cluster, two phones send the rtp streams
to each other until they hang up. If a phone makes an offnet call, the two
- The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
--
*From: *Nara Shikamaru
to appropriate profile.
Nara Shikamaru wrote:
In working though this section and doublechecking my work in the Proctor
Guide, there seem to be a few steps missing in the solution (like
associating the line 5002 to the end user gwashington, not just the device.)
So, I'm wondering if my problem
- The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
*From: *Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
*Date: *Mon, 12
*To:* Nara Shikamaru; Vik Malhi
*Cc:* OSL Group
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to approach CME basic install
Yes we can do that UNLESS question specifically says to perform
firmware conversion locally on CME
*From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto
Can someone tell me where to find specific sections for CUBE and plus
dialing in volume 1? When the material was initially released, I don't
think it was included.
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nara,
I got same thing like u following the PG steps.
erwan
--- On *Sat, 10/10/09, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com* wrote:
From: Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 4 Question 1.2 - CUPS integration
To: OSL Group ccie_voice
This isn't addressed in the labs, but COULD be eventually so why not ask
(the Proctor Labs IPCC Express servers are licensed for Premium HA.) I've
configured IPCCexpress and IPPA in a scenario to test its feasibility in an
upgrade at work but realized as I set up one-button login for IPPA that
In working though this section and doublechecking my work in the Proctor
Guide, there seem to be a few steps missing in the solution (like
associating the line 5002 to the end user gwashington, not just the
device.) So, I'm wondering if my problem is related to anything else not
mentioned in the
Guys,
A couple of questions; are you referring to Volume 1 or Volume 2 lab
3? Also, is this a problem on the vrack?
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:49 AM, J Hogan j.jho...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes same thing here
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2009, at 7:53 AM, ABIOLA ADEFILA
Are you able to dial into CUC with a VoIP phone (assuming you have one
configured for your test) and get it it to transfer you? If you can, there
may be a dtmf issue. If you can't, there may be a call routing restriction
in CUC.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:11 PM, J Hogan j.jho...@gmail.com wrote:
an IVR type application, like BACD but not
BACD. Have no idea where the app is. It's not built-in either.
--
*From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
shikam...@kagadis.com]
*Sent:* Saturday
This is an interesting scenario. Is this realistic - back-hauling a CME
PRI to CUCM?
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Andrew Lythgoe lythgo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erwan,
In your config for BR2 I see you have:
controller E1 0/2
clock source internal
pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service
I'm looking through the mock labs to find topics that weren't covered in
labs 1 2 (Presence and BACD, namely). I noticed a couple of things and
need a reality check;
- There's a problem in mock lab 5, it looks like it's combining lab 4 and 5
in the lab 5 pdf. Is it just me? (Other than that,
] *On Behalf Of *Nara Shikamaru
*Sent:* Sunday, October 04, 2009 9:22 PM
*To:* Michael Ciarfello
*Cc:* OSL Group
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab blueprint question
Someone just mentioned that BACD is on Vol 2 Lab 4 (which I'm getting ready
to do), I must have missed it when I reviewed
SIP SRST is new to me, having trouble figuring out part of the syntax (the
Proctor Guide doesn't really discuss it). On BR1, when configuring voice
register pool 1, there's a line saying application sip.app, I'm assuming
refering to a file on flash that needs to be invoked in an SRST scenario.
Has anyone noticed that solutions 9.1 and 9.2 in the PG are missing (and 9.3
references BACD that's not part of the lab?) Is something wrong with my
.pdf?
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
The firmware is probably compatible but you may still have an issue using
that phone that won't surface until later on.
I ran into a similar situation last weekend when I was configuring SIP on
CME. I made a mistake and used the wrong interface as the source address
under *voice register
Mention your constant training, people like to hear that their engineer's
are always trying to learn new things that will benefit their organizations.
Talk about your background and track record and discuss some of the hardest
projects you've been part of and how you managed them.
On Tue, Sep
Has anyone reviewed the PG solution for this question? The PG references a
BACD (presumably CME). I can't find any reference in the question itself
regard CME or in any of the ensuing sections (in fact, am I wrong, there's
not much CME configuration in this mock lab besides the basics.)
.
--
*From: *Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
*Date: *Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:45:40 -0700
*To: *OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject: *[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2 - Question about
the Proctor Guide solution confusion
Has
VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an
error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license
restriction.) Is there a work around for home labbers?
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding
Frustrating.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
Frustrating.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Michael Ciarfello mciarfe...@iplogic.com
wrote:
No, you have to buy it. And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo
licenses you can get from
specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?
(Nara Shikamaru)
2. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Mike Thompson)
3. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Aamir Panjwani
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?
(Nara Shikamaru)
2. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Mike Thompson)
3. Re: vol 2
. Cube3 turns into cube2, etc.
--
*From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
shikam...@kagadis.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:14 AM
*To:* Brett Hillman
*Cc:* ccie_voice
Working through the Media section of this lab, I'm having what I think is a
transcoding problem with MOH. All RTP streams across WAN, in this lab, are
g729. MOH works okay for HQ but not for BR1. If HQ phone calls the BR1
phone and BR1 presses hold, music plays on HQ. If the opposite happens
transcoders. If you session into the HQ router, there will be a
variety of show SCCP options. That will give you a lot of insight into how
the DSP Farm resources are being utilized (for MTP/RSVP, for Xcode, for
conference, etc).
Poke around in there, it has very valuable info.
*From:* Nara
specifically state that transcoding must be invoked…then there’s
no issue doing it.
*From:* Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com]
*Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2009 10:42 PM
*To:* Mike Thompson
*Cc:* OSL Group
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X
:* Brian Valentine [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2009 10:50 PM
*To:* 'Mike Thompson'; 'Nara Shikamaru'
*Cc:* 'OSL Group'
*Subject:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 7.X
Can we even transcode a multicast moh feed?
*From:* ccie_voice-boun
] On Behalf Of J Hogan [
j.jho...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, September 27, 2009 8:41 AM
*To:* Nara Shikamaru
*Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 CAS
the domanin name i removed. and yes the router host name matches too?
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM
My gatekeeper is working fine, my HQ phones and BR2 phones can all call each
other but I've noticed that when the BR2 phones call HQ phones the called
person's name (ie; HQ PH1) does not show up on the BR2 phone. Not so for HQ
phones calling BR2 phones. If BR2 phone calls an HQ phone, all I get
Nevermind. It might help if I configured the Alerting Name on the HQ and
BR1 phones. Long day, time for a break :(
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
My gatekeeper is working fine, my HQ phones and BR2 phones can all call
each other but I've noticed
I'm working through the same issue today, too. The PG left out some steps,
like setting up BR2 ras dial peers and the CUCM route pattern but I able to
pick up on it. CUCM to CME calls work fine, CME to CUCM calls hang up when
you answer.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Michael Ciarfello
, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
I'm working through the same issue today, too. The PG left out some steps,
like setting up BR2 ras dial peers and the CUCM route pattern but I able to
pick up on it. CUCM to CME calls work fine, CME to CUCM calls hang up when
Verify that the gateway's hostname.domain-name matches the Domain Name field
on the router.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:11 PM, J Hogan j.jho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All
I have a T1 configured and I keep getting registration rejected. I
beleive I am doing everything right
1.) I restarted
, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
wrote:
I had no idea there was a PRI limit. I was thinking, potentially, I may
need to terminate 8 PRIs on a 2811 but in truth I'm planning on having 3
2811 for redundancy and spread the span against all three. Plenty of ports
Okay, my question is not really out of the modules, just a question about a
real world scenario. I'm preparing to increase the size of our VoIP network
and am aware of the principle differences between the ISRs. Our remote sites
will have subscribers, so SRST is not really an issue, and the ISRs
streams can that
support (and will it be enough)?
2811 Fasthethernet = 100 Mbps
1024 kbps = 1 Mbps
100 Mbps = 102400 kbps
102400 kbps/80kbps = 1280 G711 streams supported (did I do this correctly?)
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
Okay, my question
Earlier I began a thread regarding choosing the right ISR for an
implementation if all it's doing is terminating PRIs and not routing data
vlan traffic. The different ISRs have different interfaces, so I started to
wonder exactly how many voice streams could be processed throug a given
interface
assist
with these design questions, but you can always try.
--
*From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
shikam...@kagadis.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:01 PM
*To:* OSL
Don't they usually announce content changes way ahead of time (like 3
months)?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Kevin Damisch
kevin.dami...@vitalsite.comwrote:
Anyone else notice that there are no lab dates available between Oct 6thand
Oct 19
th? Kind of strange as there are always
Joel,
Don't schedule the lab attempt until you're ready - push your December
date out. Even if you're ready, chances are you won't make it - the failure
rate for the first attempt is high. Just adjust.
IPexpert, honestly, has been awesome about rescheduling my boot camp and
working with my
In 5.1, it says that we need to configure CAC via locations to allow fo 4
g729 calls. From my Cisco QOS book;
g711 at 50 pps
g711 at 33 pps
g729A at 50 pps
g729A at 50 pps
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
Sorry, I sent my last email prematurely :(
In 5.1, it says that we need to configure CAC via locations to allow fo 4
g729 calls. From my Cisco QOS book;
g711 at 50 pps - 80 kbps
g711 at 33 pps - 75 kbps
g729A at 50 pps - 24 kbps
g729A at 50 pps - 19 kbps
These are the figures I'm used to
I've been working through my studies for about a year now, my lab date is
set for probably February, and I have to say that overall I'm enjoying the
process of preparing (and learning). There are a LOT of things on this exam
that never come up in the course of everyday work as an enterprise
. CUBE is doing…….. Codec conversion.
The GK has nothing to do with codec negotiation.
And there is only one GK.
*From:* Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:20 AM
*To:* Michael Ciarfello
*Cc:* OSL Group
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice
I need some help understanding this logic. In this question we are asked
to focus on two sites (HQ and BR2) that are communicating via gatekeeper and
CUBE. The question seems to be saying that the gatekeeper is being engaged
in instances of a call originating from BR2 to CUCM (because the
Arun,
What do you mean by rebuild the cluster? If you have a pub at one
site and a sub at the other, you probably have each site's phone register
locally to their own host (eliminating the need for SRST for the most
part.) The only thing that's affected when you move the hosts is intrasite
damaged.
You should have a testing plan and run through it after you turn the SUB
off and before you take it away.
--
*From:* Arun Kumar [arunv...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 15, 2009 12:16 AM
*To:* Michael Ciarfello
*Cc:* Nara Shikamaru; ccie_voice
. lol.
--
*From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
shikam...@kagadis.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, September 13, 2009 7:22 PM
*To:* OSL Group
*Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 1 Q 10.1
In 10.1 we're asked to create a hunt group with a SCCP and SIP to be used in
an SRST condition. Voice register pool 1 makes use of *sip.app*, which I
don't happen to have on my flash. Can someone tell me where I can find
this? If I disable it, SRST inbound calling works again (with the use of a
PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
wrote:
That's not true. To the larger point of Padhu's question Contact Center
Enterprise is a non-issue for the exam as it is a completely different
animal from IPCCexpress. It's designed for zero failure requirements and
can handle much heavier
I'm working through configuring and editing the auto-qos part of this
question and noticed that the class maps aren't being created (or for that
matter the *service-policy input AutoQoS-Police-CiscoPhone* syntax on the
phone interface). Is this an issue with the version of IOS? I'm running
Nevermind, that was it. Upgraded, works fine now. Yay.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
I'm working through configuring and editing the auto-qos part of this
question and noticed that the class maps aren't being created (or for that
matter
I have CME in my home lab too, I think it's a matter of getting used to it.
Once you shut off your phone ports to make sure nothing tries to connect
during setup, specify your loads and configurations in your
telephony-service and voice register global settings and already have the
correct SCCP
This has happened to me before. A phone got stuck in upgrading, I forgot to
unplug it before leaving the office, when I came back it finished
upgrading. Not exactly sure why this happens, sometimes if you give it a
lot of time it gets around to downloading the files. PROVIDED you've set up
the
:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nara Shikamaru
*Sent:* Wednesday, 9 September 2009 12:12 AM
*To:* OSL Group
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 1 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
You know, could I be having this problem because a transcoder hasn't been
configured in CUCM yet
Am I missing something - 4.6 in this lab seems to be asking to have
international dialing active during business hours but the Proctor Guide's
solution seems to be setting up the international dialing to only work after
hours (the opposite). Is this an error?
--
-Shikamaru
You know, could I be having this problem because a transcoder hasn't been
configured in CUCM yet? I've been working through the lab step-by-step,
don't know if this is something that would have come up later?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
I'm
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
