You win some you lose some. It was Bains company to do with what they wanted.
Would it have lasted on its own without them? Why was it sold to them?
On Jan 19, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> for what it may be worth, one Florida's experience with Bain Capital does
> not support the r
I don't think log run is in their vocabulary...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 7:07 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Obama administration to reject Keystone XL
A lot of our gas comes from Canada. Still doesn't mean
A lot of our gas comes from Canada. Still doesn't mean that allowing
them to build a pipeline without complying with the rules is a good
idea. As with nuclear power, drilling, tar sands or any other
process, energy that is not safely produced is not cheap in the long
run. But tell that to the g
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I the republicans didn't block the bills for those shovel ready jobs, they
> would be there. Despite all of that he was able to staunch the hemorrhaging
> of jobs the economy saw under Bush and get the numbers moving in a positive
> direct
That was in the news...
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:15 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Obama administration to reject Keystone XL
this is I think the third time that Leahy has introduced copyright
legislation. An
Oil always peaks out in the summer. And that is cheap compared to the rest
of the world...If the pipeline was built, are they going to go poof and it
is there? It is going to take several years to get it built and inspected
before it is even ready to have oil flow through it, It takes about a y
You guys should vote for Paul. He'd probably help them build a nuke.
That would probably solve the Israel problem.
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:02 PM, PT wrote:
>
> And who is going to pay for another "conflict"?
>
> Dammit congress, you and your war profiteers .. I mean, companies with
> defen
http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/07/the-democrats-corruption-problem/
Speaking of corruption
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> What corruption?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.am
what? Can you not get bipartisan through your head, Sam? You're still
talking about "Republican issue" I am saying that the current copyright
legislation has members of both parties on each side. Issa, for example, is
on the right side on this one, and Boxer and Feinstein are not. And Issa is
Here here!
Or is it Hear Hear?
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> ya? What did she do that was corrupt, supposedly? I have only mildly been
> paying attention, but I thought the Republicans mainly thought she was a
> bitch, which... well, is an appellation that gets thrown arou
http://nation.foxnews.com/nancy-pelosi/2011/11/14/60-minutes-exposes-pelosi-corruption
Finally something I agree with, and yet you seem to be attacking for
defending Boehner.
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> There were actually several threads regarding Pelosi and her purp
this is I think the third time that Leahy has introduced copyright
legislation. And each bill has been worse than the last. I saw a rumor go
by on Twitter yesterday that he was trying to work a deal out with Kyl.
Have not followed up on that to check it, but the source was mmm, I would
say, likely
So now you're bi-partisan?
What Republican issue did you support that dems were against?
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> Indeed. The whole copyright legislation issue involves both Democrats and
> Republican legislators. Opposition and support for these bills is
> bipartisan.
> Oil prices aren't skyrocketing, and even if they were, this pipeline
> would not affect them for decades. There have been multiple
> statements of how many jobs would be created, but even if you accept
> the highest estimate of 179,000 jobs by 2035, it would have almost nil
> effect on unemploy
Lamar Smith, a republican from Texas (go figure), has promised to bring it
back up this spring...so it's not dead...it's zombie legislation...
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 3:08 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Obama ad
I was shocked...mark Kirk, my republican senator, and I actually agreed the
SOPA and PIPA were bad *looking up at the sky for falling objects...*
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:59 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Obama
And who is going to pay for another "conflict"?
Dammit congress, you and your war profiteers .. I mean, companies with
defense contracts, might not care, but we are out of money.
So, we start screwing around with Iran. What is the return on that
investment? We have them surrounded, their nei
What corruption?
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:41 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Obama administration to reject Keystone XL
This is not about Pelosi. Remember the other thread about Pelosi's
corruption? Yeah, we had n
Isn't that supposed to be the mark of Cain or some crap like that?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:53 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Researchers evolve a multicellular yeast in the lab in 2 months
I saw this on the i
As long as those in power can profit from war, there will be war.
Their ability to use the propaganda machine to create villains has
become even more effective with the use of the Internet and 24/7
media. The only way to stop them is to refuse to be their propaganda
tool. Don't even say their na
amen
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:47 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
>
> http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/18/iran-threatens-us-persian-gulf-cities-with-missile-attacks
>
> A "nuclear Iran" is the next bogeyman that is being constructed to convince
> you that your sons and daughters should be sent t
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/18/iran-threatens-us-persian-gulf-cities-with-missile-attacks
A "nuclear Iran" is the next bogeyman that is being constructed to convince
you that your sons and daughters should be sent thousands of miles away to
die.
Please...for the love of all that
I agree with the effect of money on elections. However. If it gets to a
certain level of egregiousness, action should be taken, such as took place
with what's his name, the exterminator from Sugarland. Since she certainly
doesn't seem any less disliked than he was, the fact that nothing has been
f
ya? What did she do that was corrupt, supposedly? I have only mildly been
paying attention, but I thought the Republicans mainly thought she was a
bitch, which... well, is an appellation that gets thrown around a lot,
shall we say. Nonetheless. If there are credible grounds for corruption
charges,
Obama's Hollywood contributors aren't the big corporations behind
these bills. In fact, a large number of those in the entertainment
industry aren't very happy the companies controlling the record labels
and film distribution. See recent statements by George Lucas
regarding his latest film, and
Except that House rule 3 clearly states that "members shall vote on
each question put, except having a direct personal or pecuniary
interest in the event of each question."
http://ethics.house.gov/sites/ethics.house.gov/files/fin%20trans%20pink%20sheet.pdf
- pp3-4.
And they give a very specific
General consensus among the opposition is that she uses her position
frequently for financial gain. Lots of mud has been thrown, but no
legal action has ever been taken against her. She is probably not
lily white, but I would bet a gold dollar that you could not find a
single member of any legis
check out Obama's campaign contributions from Hollywood. I was worried that
he would sign it. Still am, a little. That he had to come out against it is
a measure of how bad the bill really is. I am still afraid that while we
are looking at the SOPA boogieman, compromise legislation will go through
Absolutely true in this case. I am aghast that Patrick Leahy, who was
one of the very few politicians I actually liked, introduced the PIPA
bill. Did some serious rethinking of my opinion of him as a result.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> Indeed. The whole copyright legislat
There were actually several threads regarding Pelosi and her purported
corruption on the list last summer. No proof however, just
accusations as usual. I hate the whole concept of deciding guilt by
public opinion, whether the accused is Pelosi or Boehner. Due
Process, people. It's there for a
Indeed. The whole copyright legislation issue involves both Democrats and
Republican legislators. Opposition and support for these bills is
bipartisan. The people who spoke up about it yesterday disagree on many
other issues. It is possible to decide something is wrong without checking
the party l
A sitting Congress cannot vote themselves pay increases, they can only
vote an increase for the next Congress, of which they may or may not
be part.
Just curious. How many pay raises has Congress received over the last 20 years?
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:46 PM, GMoney wrote:
> Doesn't Congres
Oil prices aren't skyrocketing, and even if they were, this pipeline
would not affect them for decades. There have been multiple
statements of how many jobs would be created, but even if you accept
the highest estimate of 179,000 jobs by 2035, it would have almost nil
effect on unemployment rates
you're in charge of finding a reason to start one, Sam.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> This is not about Pelosi. Remember the other thread about Pelosi's
> corruption? Yeah, we had none.
>
> But it's nice to pretend you would care.
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Da
Your article mention Exxon, ConocoPhillips and Chevron.
They are big companies.
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Not just oil companies, but specifically companies that are partnered
> in the Keystone XL project. Like companies who specialize in making
> the pipes, o
Ah, there are issues with the pipeline route too? I assumed the concerns
were around the extraction process. Cause this is tar-sand oil, right?
Noted, then, though the main point I was trying to make was even if you
don't believe the problem is some sort of attempt at responsible
stewardship -- w
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> When you stand
> to make a lot of money as a result of your abuse of office, isn't that
> corruption?
>
I don't know...is it? Are legislators forever required to only vote on
issues that guarantee they will LOSE money...?
Doesn't Congress
The environmental issue have been resolved.
Compliance, permits all done.
This is about politics and for some reason this admin thinks permanent
high unemployment and skyrocketing oil prices is good.
Unfortunately many agree with him simply because he's not a Republican.
Sad.
.
On Thu, Jan 19
This is not about Pelosi. Remember the other thread about Pelosi's
corruption? Yeah, we had none.
But it's nice to pretend you would care.
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> but you still stand by saying I want to give the Democrats a pass, huh?
> Just wanna correct the failure
Not just oil companies, but specifically companies that are partnered
in the Keystone XL project. Like companies who specialize in making
the pipes, or TransCanada etc. In other words he stands to make a
substantial profit because of his legislative efforts. When you stand
to make a lot of money a
Basically a Canadian firm is trying to build a pipeline through what
some say are environmentally sensitive areas of the US without
compliance with the permitting process, and members of Congress set
what White House claims is an unreasonable deadline for the permit to
be issued that does not giv
but you still stand by saying I want to give the Democrats a pass, huh?
Just wanna correct the failure to crop out what I actually said ;)
Sam, you're amazing
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Sorry bad cropping.
> take it from here:
>
> > If Boehner is corrupt, as it would seem
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:09 PM, GMoney wrote:
> Adam was white, but Eve was part African, Hispanic, Asian, Latino, American
> Indian
>
Adam and Eve were Test Tube Babies of Annunaki!
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Antholo
Sorry bad cropping.
take it from here:
> If Boehner is corrupt, as it would seem from the little I
> > have read about this, then that is bad and he should be prosecuted.
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I am amused that you cropped down to the paragraph that said Pelosi shou
for what it may be worth, one Florida's experience with Bain Capital does
not support the refrain of job creation:
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/01/18/2596300/in-miami-story-of-profits-and.html
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion A
I am amused that you cropped down to the paragraph that said Pelosi should
be prosecuted if she has done something corrupt, before you accused me of
giving the Democrats a pass.
I am against corruption. Period.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Boehner invested in Oil companies,
Boehner invested in Oil companies, like most Americans do. Either
through 401ks or buying shares. This pipeline will not make the oil
companies rich. They will always be rich, it's just another small
project for them but a huge one for America.
But tar and feather anyone with an R next to their n
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I saw this on the inner webs the other day:
>
> 'If Adam and Eve were white, and evolution doesn't exist, where did
> black people come from'
>
Adam was white, but Eve was part African, Hispanic, Asian, Latino, American
Indian
~
specific evidence please. Not rhetoric like "selling out job creation
for votes from the green movement."
Is there a specific agreement? Has this been publicized in a reputable
newspaper, not world net daily btw.
Boehner's involvement is very clear and is mostly there for all to
see. His financi
I saw this on the inner webs the other day:
'If Adam and Eve were white, and evolution doesn't exist, where did
black people come from'
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> This is a really cool research project. Scientists started out with
> single celled yeast and decided
job creation, lol. Don't wear the words out before the general election ;)
I am as cynical as the next person, but also willing to consider that
perhaps the cost-benefit ratio had a part in the decision. I have not
really researched the matter and won't have time to do so, but I have an
open mind
"I was just pointing out the corruption involved on the Republican side."
But why didn't you bring out the corruption of the
Democrats, particularly President Obama selling out job creation for votes
from the green movement. It's okay to be balanced.
"The speaker stands to make hundreds of th
To followup:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71657.html
Perry to drop out, endorse Newt
By: Emily Schultheis
January 19, 2012 09:29 AM EST
CHARLESTON, S.C. Texas Gov. Rick Perry is expected to end his
presidential campaign Thursday and endorse Newt Gingrich, two sources
confirm to
Texas Gov. Rick Perry will end his campaign for the Republican
presidential nomination Thursday and endorse Newt Gingrich, POLITICO
has confirmed. An announcement is scheduled for 11 a.m. in South
Carolina.
~|
Order the Adobe Col
I'd go for Douglas Adam's theories, either with the mice or we were
populated originally by bureaucrats, hair dressers and telephone
disinfectors.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> I like the Terry Pratchett theory -- the time-traveller's ham sandwich in
> some primordial pool.
>
55 matches
Mail list logo
