Of course we are. And modest too.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> You guys are the best! LOL
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> +9001 !!!
>> Your move cf-comm... your move.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Vivec wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > +9000 !!
You guys are the best! LOL
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> +9001 !!!
> Your move cf-comm... your move.
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> >
> > +9000 !!!
> >
> > On 5 March 2012 19:03, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > no not +1,
> > >
> > > +1000
> > >
+9001 !!!
Your move cf-comm... your move.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> +9000 !!!
>
> On 5 March 2012 19:03, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> >
> > no not +1,
> >
> > +1000
> >
> >
>
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfu
+9000 !!!
On 5 March 2012 19:03, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> no not +1,
>
> +1000
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http
no not +1,
+1000
On Monday, March 5, 2012, Dana wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
>>
>> Oh. Especially Rush. He sucks the most of all. Just because.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>>
>> > And all the people out there that say
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Damn straight and well said Erika.
>
> I know a number of women, my wife and my sister included, who started
> taking hormonal birth control before they were sexually active in
> order to help regulate abnormal and debilitating menstrual c
Damn straight and well said Erika.
I know a number of women, my wife and my sister included, who started
taking hormonal birth control before they were sexually active in
order to help regulate abnormal and debilitating menstrual cycles.
And even if various birth control methods didn't have othe
*clapping*
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:24 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not accepting Rush's apology
You know what. Fine. Lets get personal. Because I could care less if people
know this about me.
Don'
One more time:
INSURANCE PAYS FOR THE PILL WHEN IT"S USED FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES
Says so right here:
http://studentaffairs.georgetown.edu/insurance/faqs.html
Q. Are pre-existing conditions covered?
A. Pre-existing conditions are covered if the condition or treatment
is not specifically exclu
+1
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> Oh. Especially Rush. He sucks the most of all. Just because.
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> > And all the people out there that say they shouldn't pay, suck too.
>
>
>
~~
Oh. Especially Rush. He sucks the most of all. Just because.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
> And all the people out there that say they shouldn't pay, suck too.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology n
Byron York writes:
The Democrats played games with us the day before [the hearing],
says a Republican committee source. After days of asking for a
witness, they waited until the last minute, the afternoon before the
hearing. They asked us to invite Rev. Barry Lynn [head of Americans
Unit
You know what. Fine. Lets get personal. Because I could care less if people
know this about me.
Don't pay for contraception. But can the companies that do make, for
instance, Ortho Novum 777 please make a similar product and market it under
"fibroid reducer" and whatever other market speak exists
Sounds more like she's saying: "Winning!"
.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>
> "I don't think that a statement like this issued, saying that his
> choice of words was not the best, changes anything, and especially
> when that statement is issued when he's under signific
omosexuals.
-Original Message-
From: j...@garzasixpack.com [mailto:j...@garzasixpack.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 2:23 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not accepting Rush's apology
No. That's not what this debate is about. The debate is about whether or
not the government c
I think she has a point. Here's what she said.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/sandra-fluke-rush-limbaugh-apology-change/story?id=15849793#.T1UjRtFWrr8
"I don't think that a statement like this issued, saying that his
choice of words was not the best, changes anything, and especially
when tha
>
> " for the insulting word choices."
See, look. He didn't apologize for what he said. He apologized for the
words he said it in. Then he says something about personal responsibility
and talks about Young People Today.
Dana
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Dana wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> it wasn'
he wanders in and out. Was last seen comparing batshit AZ politicians to
batshit CA politicians.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Church should not have sway over individual rights.
>
> Some churches do not permit blood transfusions. Should people die as a
> result?
>
> Where h
"For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity,
three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the
wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal
attack on Ms. Fluke.
I think it is absolutely absurd that during these very serious
political t
kind of boilerplate. I guess, to be picky, you are right though -- I mean
that I don't believe he is sincere.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:24 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> >
> > I'd have to look up the quote, but he essentially said well, I should not
> > h
Church should not have sway over individual rights.
Some churches do not permit blood transfusions. Should people die as a
result?
Where health is concerned, what a church wants or does not want is
immaterial. The person's health concerns take precedence.
But discussing that may be another thre
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:22 PM, j...@garzasixpack.com wrote:
>
> No. That's not what this debate is about. The debate is about whether or
> not the government can force a religious institution to do things that are
> against the moral tenets of the religion. In other words, is the first
> ame
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I'd have to look up the quote, but he essentially said well, I should not
> have used those words, right? Nothing there about yeah it was kind of wrong
> to look at a woman testifying on a point of public policy, and change the
> subject to how oft
No. That's not what this debate is about. The debate is about whether or
not the government can force a religious institution to do things that are
against the moral tenets of the religion. In other words, is the first
amendment worth the parchment its written on? This administration doe
I'd have to look up the quote, but he essentially said well, I should not
have used those words, right? Nothing there about yeah it was kind of wrong
to look at a woman testifying on a point of public policy, and change the
subject to how often she has sex. In other words he didn't apologize for
t
Because she turned down the apology on the Ed Shultz show maybe? The
same Ed Shultz that called Laura Ingram a "slut" not so long ago.
Today the View. Now it's about censoring the Right and I was shocked
to see Whoopie of all people stand against pressuring his advertisers.
.
On Mon, Mar 5, 20
Ding-ding-ding-ding!!!
We have a winner.
The Dems had a male witness, than at the last minute they tried to
switch in this activist. When that failed, Pelosi made a side circus
act and Rush took the bait.
.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So I hear that the student says she do
How is not accepting a questionable apology by a top 10 media figure which
was devastating to your reputation "pure politics"?
I don't know that I would accept it that easily, either.
I would demand a LOT more groveling and backpedalling, personally.
Now, if she goes on to make this about Repub
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> it wasn't an apology. Whether she should have done the nice-girl thing and
> said "don't worry about it"... isn't the problem that he already doesn't? I
> doubt it's a campaign where people plotted ahead of time to do this that
> and the other the
it wasn't an apology. Whether she should have done the nice-girl thing and
said "don't worry about it"... isn't the problem that he already doesn't? I
doubt it's a campaign where people plotted ahead of time to do this that
and the other the second he put his foot in his mouth. I mean, I am not
su
30 matches
Mail list logo
