>> > construction, etcalso throw in the "protection" role of
> >> Blackwater or
> >> >> > whatever they call themselves these days...Xe I think...or did they
> >> >> change
> >> >> > that too? You have a pretty sweet
ving
>> >> >> > tax
>> >> >> > > dollars to his buddies based on no bid contracts for civilians to
>> >> take
>> >> >> > over
>> >> >> > > many of the military functions...like cooks, mechanics,
>> >> > over
> >> >> > > many of the military functions...like cooks, mechanics, laundry,
> >> >> > > construction, etcalso throw in the "protection" role of
> >> Blackwater
> >> >> or
> >> >&
lackwater or
>> >> > whatever they call themselves these days...Xe I think...or did they
>> >> change
>> >> > that too? You have a pretty sweet deal for defense contractors.
>> >> Military
>> >> > industrial complex is swimming in
> >> change
> >> > that too? You have a pretty sweet deal for defense contractors.
> >> Military
> >> > industrial complex is swimming in cash...at least until the treasury
> is
> >> > drained. He certainly didn't tr
ot; role of
>> Blackwater
>> >> or
>> >> > > whatever they call themselves these days...Xe I think...or did they
>> >> > change
>> >> > > that too? You have a pretty sweet deal for defense contractors.
>> >> >
lves these days...Xe I think...or did they
> >> > change
> >> > > that too? You have a pretty sweet deal for defense contractors.
> >> > Military
> >> > > industrial complex is swimming in cash...at least until the
> treasury is
> >> > >
> that too? You have a pretty sweet deal for defense contractors.
>> > Military
>> > > industrial complex is swimming in cash...at least until the treasury is
>> > > drained. He certainly didn't try to bolster the treasury with the tax
>> > cuts
ntil the treasury is
>> > drained. He certainly didn't try to bolster the treasury with the tax
>> cuts
>> > to the rich. The ones to the middle class and lower class were a
>> pittance
>> > and in reality didn't do squat. Welcome to the fascist police
least until the treasury is
> > > drained. He certainly didn't try to bolster the treasury with the tax
> > cuts
> > > to the rich. The ones to the middle class and lower class were a
> > pittance
> > > and in reality didn't do squat. Welcome t
lower class were a
> pittance
> > and in reality didn't do squat. Welcome to the fascist police state my
> > friends...
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:17 PM
> >
I can send you a couple of cases. Might as well try it.
.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I don't think there is enough lye to get rid of that image in my mind.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthol
the rich. The ones to the middle class and lower class were a pittance
> and in reality didn't do squat. Welcome to the fascist police state my
> friends...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:1
I don't think there is enough lye to get rid of that image in my mind.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I think he's the love child of Karl Rove and Ann Coulter.
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> At this point I think Sam is amos a bot. He's eas
And sanity has left the building...again
.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Afghanistan also has significant deposits of minerals used in high
> tech manufacturing.
>
> However, I really don't think that was the reason we invaded. It's
> possible that some far right de
the fascist police state my
friends...
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:17 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
Afghanistan also has significant deposits of minerals used in high tech
manufacturing.
, 2012 8:11 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
right. I didn't recognize the acronym until I realized it's the name I was
trying to remember about an American century. Project for a New American
Century was it?
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Eric Ro
Afghanistan also has significant deposits of minerals used in high
tech manufacturing.
However, I really don't think that was the reason we invaded. It's
possible that some far right delusional folks thought we might take
over Afghanistan and suppress the Taliban and do a good job extracting
reso
;
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 11:28 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> According to some former cabinet members, there were meetings before
> 9/11 about the po
t;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:01 PM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Maureen w
Who me?
Or am I just paranoid again.
.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I think he's the love child of Karl Rove and Ann Coulter.
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> At this point I think Sam is amos a bot. He's easily manipulated to
>> spew on c
I think he's the love child of Karl Rove and Ann Coulter.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> At this point I think Sam is amos a bot. He's easily manipulated to
> spew on command.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Co
PNAC
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 11:28 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
According to some former cabinet members, there were meetings before
9/11 about the possibility of invading Iraq
Bear Shit
.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> According to some former cabinet members, there were meetings before
> 9/11 about the possibility of invading Iraq.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthol
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:14 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> I got Bush saying "He killed my daddy",
This is not a partisan issue, folks. This is an issue that is
important for America. This is an American issue, a uniquely American
issue. And it's -- as I reminded the members, that -- I say uniquely
Ame
According to some former cabinet members, there were meetings before
9/11 about the possibility of invading Iraq.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:14 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> No but we can state the obvious.
>>
>> Most of the top democrats wanted the
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> No but we can state the obvious.
>
> Most of the top democrats wanted the war and they cared not about the Bush
> 41.
>
> Bush 43 appointed realists like Colin Powell and had advisers like
> Baker before 911.
> That tells us he had no intention of
No but we can state the obvious.
Most of the top democrats wanted the war and they cared not about the Bush 41.
Bush 43 appointed realists like Colin Powell and had advisers like
Baker before 911.
That tells us he had no intention of an aggressive foreign policy and
no intentions of starting a w
sday, May 24, 2012 7:15 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> Are you folks really still trying to rewrite what happened?
>
> .
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> The Bush administration certainly
What are we rewriting? More spewing Sam...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 7:15 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
Are you folks really still trying to rewrite what happened?
.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2
s plus they wanted to build a pipeline through
>> Afghanistan...so yes...oil ;-)
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:01 PM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Pics from the
yes...oil ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:01 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Greed was the motiv
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> It's not as simple as "He tried to kill my daddy!"
>
> Lot's of things happened and many years of discussion. One thing for
> certain is it had nothing to do with daddy Bush.
>
I disagree...but there's no way to prove it either way.
It's not as simple as "He tried to kill my daddy!"
Lot's of things happened and many years of discussion. One thing for
certain is it had nothing to do with daddy Bush.
.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:03 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Just a personal opinion, Sam. We know what's "written" about our suppose
Just a personal opinion, Sam. We know what's "written" about our supposed
reasoning for invading Iraq. Do you believe everything the administration
told you about why they made the decision to invade Iraq? And if so, why?
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> That would be a yes.
>
>
That would be a yes.
> Are you folks really still trying to rewrite what happened?
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>> That pretty much leaves greed and revenge for trying
>> to kill B
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> That pretty much leaves greed and revenge for trying
> to kill Bush Sr. I think it was both.
>
yes i know, and i think it was mostly revenge. "He tried to kill my daddy!"
Are you folks really still trying to rewrite what happened?
.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The Bush administration certainly had no qualms about getting over 5000 of
> our soldiers killed in Iraq...so why not a bunch of Iraqi civilians? He
> obviously was very call
nesday, May 23, 2012 11:35 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Do you think those who provided the weapons and supplies for the war
> didn't make any money?
>
> Where do you think the billions of doll
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Do you think those who provided the weapons and supplies for the war
> didn't make any money?
>
> Where do you think the billions of dollars spend on that war went?
>
He killed thousands of Americans and untold thousands of Iraqi's..so
th
Do you think those who provided the weapons and supplies for the war
didn't make any money?
Where do you think the billions of dollars spend on that war went?
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:00 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Greed was the motive. Reve
well Michael Moore talked about it of course but I hadn't heard anything
about it either. Got curious and googled -- found this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Afghanistan_Pipeline
I have not tried to check any of its facts. Consider this a driveby
contribution to the discussion, gotta go.
m]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:27 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> I have major complaints about KBR. They were conducting ops that should
> rightly have been conducted by soldiers. Cook is an MOS but ours went on
> patrols and d
Tim...have you read Rachel Maddow's "Drift"? I would highly suggest it...
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
I have major complaints about
Mineral resources plus they wanted to build a pipeline through
Afghanistan...so yes...oil ;-)
-Original Message-
From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:01 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:57 PM
Over the last few months I've been talking with people, and a lot of
reading on the topic. One thing I found very interesting was this
doctor's account of his service in Afghanistan:
http://www.amazon.com/Line-Sand-Canadians-War-Kandahar/dp/1553655923/ref=pd_cp_b_1
At the same time all else I re
In retrospect I agree.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> that was my impression. I know what people are going to say but
> frankly if we had not gone into Iraq, Afghanistan would never have
> become such a crudhole of a nation. Perhaps the Victorian British Raj
> had the
that was my impression. I know what people are going to say but
frankly if we had not gone into Iraq, Afghanistan would never have
become such a crudhole of a nation. Perhaps the Victorian British Raj
had the correct idea, wall off the place from the rest of the world
and let it stew in its own ju
I have major complaints about KBR. They were conducting ops that should
rightly have been conducted by soldiers. Cook is an MOS but ours went on
patrols and didn't cook anything, laundry could have been done cheaper by
direct hire of locals. We have carpenters and electricians in the Army, no
n
I don't agree with that at all.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:00 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> > I guess I don't see the greed motivation in Afghanistan, share?
>
>
> Islamic Fundamentali
exactly the only greed factor I can see is with KBR, but during that
time period they didn't have the same presence as they did in Iraq. I
think Tim can enlighten us on that - he was there.
But the only real money to be made in Afghanistan are with opium and weed.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:00 PM
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:00 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> I guess I don't see the greed motivation in Afghanistan, share?
Islamic Fundamentalists against Christian Fundamentalists.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http
I guess I don't see the greed motivation in Afghanistan, share?
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Greed was the motive. Revenge was the justification. Bush's trifecta.
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, GMoney wrote:
> > I guess i disagree...at least initially. Initially
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Greed was the motive. Revenge was the justification. Bush's trifecta.
>
Greed for what??? Certainly not money...they had none. No oil. No industry.
No nothing. I fail to see what we were so greedy over in Afghanistan...?
~~
Greed was the motive. Revenge was the justification. Bush's trifecta.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, GMoney wrote:
> I guess i disagree...at least initially. Initially, it was all about
> revenge. Money certainly became a factor soon thereafter, though.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Appropriate action against appropriate enemies is not turning the
> other cheek. Not a single Afghan attacked us. The thousands of
> innocents killed and the destabilization of an entire country with
> absolutely nothing done that made us any
Appropriate action against appropriate enemies is not turning the
other cheek. Not a single Afghan attacked us. The thousands of
innocents killed and the destabilization of an entire country with
absolutely nothing done that made us any safer. Bin Laden may have
been in Afghanistan, but his powe
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Which is what I said 10 years ago when I was calling for appropriate
> action against appropriate targets instead of the war in Afghanistan.
>
> I posted that here on this list I got my head handed to me.
>
> It's good to see that people are
-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:24 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> Using Libya as an example, I don't think of any other organization that
> could have done what NATO did. T
The UN could have done the same thing.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:24 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
Using Libya as an example, I don't think of any other organization that
Well, at the time I thought we were serious about it. We soon learned that
Iraq was more important for some reason, in retrospect I'd imagine it comes
down to "the tried to kill my daddy".
If I thought we were going to pursue a real and lasting change there, and
do whatever was necessary to win,
No. Had we left at that point it would have been a win, but we decided to
stay and make a show of democracy and nation building.
Thing is, while I still maintain we could win if we wanted to, it would
really ruin us on the world stage and require a huge expansion of our
efforts. Huge like reins
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:13 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Afghanistan is winnable, we just don't have the will or the intestinal
> fortitude to do what it would take.
Knowing the history of war there before we went in it I can't imagine
the confidence of winning was that high. I figured the thought
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:40 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Bring our troops home. Secure our borders. Enough is enough.
Which is what I said 10 years ago when I was calling for appropriate
action against appropriate targets instead of the war in Afghanistan.
I posted that here on this list I got
to my continued astonishment I agree with Tim again. By the way, I read
that wrongful conviction thing last night and thought its point about
wrongful conviction being a more important issue than the death penalty was
quite good.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:10 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> I agree ma
Afghanistan is winnable, we just don't have the will or the intestinal
fortitude to do what it would take.
I all honestly, there was a point after teh Taliban fell, when there were
only a very few troops in the country, that we had basically won, and could
have left to allow them to build there o
I agree man.
I think in addition to new ideas in foreign policy we need new ideas
domestically. We need to roll back the intelligence apparatus that's been
built up, and we need to get most of the intelligence community out of
working internally. We need to end the war on drugs. We need to cle
Maybe we should just use drones and kill anyone suspicious?
Oh yeah, we're already doing that.
You're plan sounds good for a minute but when you think it through it fails.
Who do we bomb? After 9/11 should it have been Afghanistan, Saudi
Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt...
Just bombing Afghanistan at the
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:40 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> I think NATOs usefulness is at an end, but I think we need to be out of the
> U.N as well.
>
> We spend far too much money on defense, and we aren't doing what would be
> necessary to win the war we still have going. We have compromised wit
can act as a military force to bring
> > together nations to act as one in a crisis.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:26 AM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: Pics from the N
s one in a crisis.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:26 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> My own opinion on NATO is yes. While its original mission was
, 2012 8:26 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
My own opinion on NATO is yes. While its original mission was as a self
defense alliance., it now serves as a organizing body for US, European and
other nations to get together for some reason. That sounds very vague but
My own opinion on NATO is yes. While its original mission was as a
self defense alliance., it now serves as a organizing body for US,
European and other nations to get together for some reason. That
sounds very vague but deliberately so. I suspect that what will be
happening with NATO is that its
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I would wager a month's salary that if you took the facemasks off
> those causing violence, you would find that a large percentage of them
> are plants put their solely to discredit the protesters. I know this
> was true in the anti-war movemen
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> It was the whole Eric's of the world bullshit comment...
>
yeah, that was admittedly meant to poke you a bit. I apologizebut your
views are not unique to you. They do fit into a pretty broad group
"I haven't been following this...what's everyone pissed off about now?"
Same old shit. Basically someone has more than someone else and so on . . .
Personally, I don't really give a damn why they are protesting.
What concerns me is the preemptive attempt to stifle the first amendment
and the p
Yer breaking my heart
.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:51 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> I'm sure you'll be missed.
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> Methinks this list just jumped the shark.
>>
>>
~|
Order the Ado
I'm sure you'll be missed.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Methinks this list just jumped the shark.
>
> .
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Dana wrote:
> >
> > yeah I am interested, especially in whether people are allowed to do it.
> > But look, if you start condemning peo
Methinks this list just jumped the shark.
.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> yeah I am interested, especially in whether people are allowed to do it.
> But look, if you start condemning people for not agreeing with you then
> you're not doing anything you believe in any good. Ju
was the whole Eric's of the world bullshit comment...
> > >
> > > I was posting them for you and Tim and a few others that do care what
> > > happens.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
> >
gt;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:32 PM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
> >
> >
> > why post the pictures if you don't think people w
omment...
>
> I was posting them for you and Tim and a few others that do care what
> happens.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:32 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
Why should I find common ground with someone who obviously isn't
> interested?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:16 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> right.
t; ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Talk to G about that...I was just responding to his comment...
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2
find common ground with someone who obviously isn't
> interested?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:16 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> right. And it'
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> Need a staple for your wrist there Cam?
>
Perhaps a paperclip for my ankle?
I'm all set on office supplies, thanks for asking.
-Cameron
...
~
Need a staple for your wrist there Cam?
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> > Why should I find common ground with someone who obviously isn't
> > interested?
>
>
> Oh God, whe
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> Why should I find common ground with someone who obviously isn't
> interested?
Oh God, where to start with this. Seriously. This entire thread is
fantastic.
-Cameron
...
~~~
Why should I find common ground with someone who obviously isn't interested?
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:16 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
right. And it's your response I am talking
I would wager you are right.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I would wager a month's salary that if you took the facemasks off
> those causing violence, you would find that a large percentage of them
> are plants put their solely to discredit the protesters. I know this
> wa
I would take that bet
.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I would wager a month's salary that if you took the facemasks off
> those causing violence, you would find that a large percentage of them
> are plants put their solely to discredit the protesters. I know this
> was tru
I would wager a month's salary that if you took the facemasks off
those causing violence, you would find that a large percentage of them
are plants put their solely to discredit the protesters. I know this
was true in the anti-war movement, the free speech movement, the civil
rights movement and t
.tier...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 3:51 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
>
>
> see, that's not a good idea either. I grant you that Sam is hopeless anyway
> and probably a bot to begin with (I have no idea what he said because I
>
hehe that makes me laugh.
.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:04 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> While I'm not crazy about Sam seemingly blind following of republican
> dogma, G's concerns are real ones. I saw the war protesters at Gathering
> of Eagles D.C. doing this very thing. One of the places I had ru
M, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> And because of the GMoney's and the Sam's of the world, the country is
> going down the tubes...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:36 AM
>
Talk to G about that...I was just responding to his comment...
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 3:51 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pics from the NATO Protest
see, that's not a good idea either. I grant you that S
>
> And because of the GMoney's and the Sam's of the world, the country is
> going down the tubes...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:36 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Pics fr
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> And because of the GMoney's and the Sam's of the world, the country is
> going down the tubes...
>
Country is going down the tubes because I don't sympathize with some
hippies in Chicago???
I knew my ap
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> And because of the GMoney's and the Sam's of the world, the country is
> going down the tubes...
Ironically, also what the internet is made of.
-Cameron
...
~~~
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:35 AM, GMoney wrote:
> If YOU initiate a confrontation, and YOU end up getting your ass kicked.
> Tough shit.
...including attempting to initiate fights with walls, windows, and other
various inanimate objects...
-Cameron
...
~~
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
