Last election? Was that when Poutine beat out Toutons?
- Original Message -
From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: electoral college
> Growing up
ussel Madere
> Webmaster
> 504.832.9835
> SunShine Pages by EATEL
> www.sunshinepages.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:53 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: electoral college
>
www.sunshinepages.com
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:53 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: electoral college
I'm not, but I've never understood how many people do not understand
why most of the world is pissed at us. Its been
I'm not, but I've never understood how many people do not understand
why most of the world is pissed at us. Its been painfully obvious for
a very long time to anyone who even looks slightly beyond the US and
local news. In other words I'm pissed that people refuse to take
responsibility for their g
Not really, but sometimes I wonder why you are :)
>
> And you wonder why the Iranians are pissed off at the US?
>
> larry.
>
>
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF
communi
gt; wrote:
> > > > You will have to forgive me but being from the UK
> > > (and being only 6 in 1981)
> > > > I don't know the circumstances surrounding that
> > > hostage release,
> > > > consequently I have no opinion on that subject.
> > > &g
Ah. Perhaps an exaggeration.
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney
someone -- not you I think --- was calling Reagan a god among men here
a while back
Dana
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:31:20 -0500, Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> Where did that come from?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: da
someone -- not you I think --- was calling Reagan a god among men here
a while back
Dana
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:31:20 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where did that come from?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dana tierney
>
> Reagan too, I hear :)
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct
Where did that come from?
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney
Reagan too, I hear :)
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:21:14 -0500, Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> Not Bush. He is perfect in every way.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dana tierneylege
>
> he worked hard not smart. Yeah, it
Reagan too, I hear :)
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:21:14 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not Bush. He is perfect in every way.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dana tierneylege
>
> he worked hard not smart. Yeah, it was one of his flaws. Most
> presidents have them, ya know
Not Bush. He is perfect in every way.
-Original Message-
From: dana tierneylege
he worked hard not smart. Yeah, it was one of his flaws. Most
presidents have them, ya know.
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macro
to forgive me but being from the UK
> > (and being only 6 in 1981)
> > > I don't know the circumstances surrounding that
> > hostage release,
> > > consequently I have no opinion on that subject.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jay
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jay
> >
> > > -Original Message-----
> > > From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 26 October 2004 13:47
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: Re: electoral college
> > >
> > > Exactly m
t hostage release,
> consequently I have no opinion on that subject.
>
> --
> Jay
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 26 October 2004 13:47
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: electoral college
> >
>
TED]>
> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:41 AM
> >Subject: RE: electoral college
> >
>
> > That would depend on the circumstances. In a simplistic world then no you
> > couldn't but the real w
t give Kerry credit for that, can you?".
>
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "dana tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 5:20 PM
> >Subject: Re: elector
I think that depends on whose numbers you use. I personally think the
recession started aftre Bush started talking about what terrible shape
the economy was in.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:06:31 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just as you can't blame Bush for the recession.
>
>
he worked hard not smart. Yeah, it was one of his flaws. Most
presidents have them, ya know.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:05:38 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I understand it, Carter's fundamental problem was that he was too smart
> and wouldn't delegate. Things just basically
> Brian wrote:
> You really can't give Kerry credit for that, can you?".
I think you'd have to credit Mr. Bush for 3 reasons:
1.) His lack of diplomatic skill.
2.) His failure to win the election.
3.) His provocative foreign policy.
Mr. Kerry would be a spectator. This is the same as the hostag
ber 2004 13:47
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: electoral college
>
> Exactly my point James. The argument is also too simplistic
> when referring to the hostage release following Reagan's
> inaugaration in 1981.
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: &q
]>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:41 AM
>Subject: RE: electoral college
>
> That would depend on the circumstances. In a simplistic world then no you
> couldn't but the real world is a bit more complex. Imagine the following
> situation
>
> The French and Germans
y for the extra
International support even if he has only been in power for a couple of
hours.
--
Jay
> -Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 October 2004 13:32
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: electoral college
>
> Now THIS is an intere
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 5:20 PM
>Subject: Re: electoral college
>
> Screwed up, yes. But if the hostages were released *as* Reagan was
> sworn in yo
Just as you can't blame Bush for the recession.
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney
Screwed up, yes. But if the hostages were released *as* Reagan was
sworn in you really can't give Reagan credit for freeing them, can
you?
Dana
~~
As I understand it, Carter's fundamental problem was that he was too smart
and wouldn't delegate. Things just basically ground to a halt as he
reviewed and approved everything.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney
He had a recession and yeah, he had the Iran hostage thing. Reagan
so? maybe this time there would not be a sandstorm. Point is, he took
his best guess, guessed wrong, and was voted out of office.
and the moral of the story is
Dana
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:13:48 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carter did not take responsibilty.
>
> He cl
Carter did not take responsibilty.
He claims he'd still do the same.
-sm
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah but starting from
>
> if Carter was in office he should take
> responsibility (and did)
>
> where does that leave Bush?
>
> Dana
> (just when you were starting to lik
yeah but starting from
if Carter was in office he should take responsibility (and did)
where does that leave Bush?
Dana
(just when you were starting to like me)
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:26:42 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All right Dana!
> Agreeing again.
>
> -sm
>
> -
All right Dana!
Agreeing again.
-sm
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always thought that was spite on the Iranians'
> part. But I from what
> I remember of the Iran thing, you really can't say
> Carter handled it
> in the best possible manner.
>
> Dana
___
based on "vote for me and things will be mistily better" is what it
was. I recall no mention in those ads of military spending :)
Dana
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:56:57 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reagan ran a campaign called "A New Morning in
> America" based on a more milit
that was the Reagan spin at the time :P
Dana
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:23:03 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're so naïve.
>
> Iran knew Reagan wasn't going to sit around and wait
> like Carter did.
> They were terrified of Reagan.
>
> -sm
>
> --- Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PR
that's about the way I remember it
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:47:08 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bill wrote:
> > What a bunch of knuckleheads. Listen and read sometimes you might
> > figure things out.
>
> I was under the impression that Iran hated Mr. Carter and realized
> that
Screwed up, yes. But if the hostages were released *as* Reagan was
sworn in you really can't give Reagan credit for freeing them, can
you?
Dana
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:30:49 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken wrote:
> > [Reagan] had more to do with the hostages coming home than an
n chalked up. But I believe his presence had more to
> do with the hostages coming home than anything Carter did.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 9:32 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: R
He had a recession and yeah, he had the Iran hostage thing. Reagan
hung that around his neck like an albatross is why he was defeated. I
am not sure the recession was his fault -- the Fed went to a monetary
policy during his term. I always thought he got bad breaks,
personally.
Dana
On Fri, 22 O
No, the election after Carter's term wasn't anywhere near this nasty.
Mind you, according to my morning paper, we have seen more political
ads here in New Mexico (mostly negative) than anywhere else in the
country except Miami.
Dana
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:52:11 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTE
It's not worth arguing about.
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam wrote:
> > Reagan ran a campaign called "A New Morning in
> > America" based on a more militarily aggressive
> foreign
> > policy and a restoration of the nation's military
> > strength.
>
> No disagreement there, but
Sam wrote:
> Reagan ran a campaign called "A New Morning in
> America" based on a more militarily aggressive foreign
> policy and a restoration of the nation's military
> strength.
No disagreement there, but I don't think the fundamentalist Muslim
Iranians really cared.
Look at it this way - Mr.
Reagan ran a campaign called "A New Morning in
America" based on a more militarily aggressive foreign
policy and a restoration of the nation's military
strength.
-sm
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > They were terrified of Reagan.
>
> I think that's going a bit far!
>
Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> I doubt the Iranians even knew Reagan and, if they did, they probably
> weren't afraid of him. He was a B-movie actor and Governor of a
> resort state. That CV doesn't exactly inspire fear.
>
That resort state would be the 13th largest economy in the world if it
were to s
> Sam wrote:
> They were terrified of Reagan.
I think that's going a bit far!
I doubt the Iranians even knew Reagan and, if they did, they probably
weren't afraid of him. He was a B-movie actor and Governor of a
resort state. That CV doesn't exactly inspire fear.
I think they just wanted to fl
You're so naïve.
Iran knew Reagan wasn't going to sit around and wait
like Carter did.
They were terrified of Reagan.
-sm
--- Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carter did all the work people!! Getting released
> the day reagan got
> sworn on? Seriously how can anything think reagan
>
> Bill wrote:
> What a bunch of knuckleheads. Listen and read sometimes you might
> figure things out.
I was under the impression that Iran hated Mr. Carter and realized
that the hostages weren't scoring them any points so they had no
reason to keep them except to spite Mr. Carter; which, for them
Carter did all the work people!! Getting released the day reagan got
sworn on? Seriously how can anything think reagan did the leg work on
it?? Come on 9/11 happens on the day bush gets sworn in its clintons
fault. Hostages released the day reagan takes off its carters win.
What a bunch of knuckle
I think they were another group taken at the same time.
Long time since I read the book, or saw the movie, though I do
remember thinking at the time that Burt Lancaster was not really right
to play H.Ross Perot... sort of like Gearge C. Scott playing
Patton...not weasely looking enough...
:-)
--
Ken wrote:
> [Reagan] had more to do with the hostages coming home than anything Carter did.
The way you and Sam have described it is the gist I have. From what I
remember Mr. Carter really screwed up the whole hostages deal.
BTW - which were the hostages that Ross Perot famously freed as
descri
In case you can't tell, I don't like Carter:)
http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/flashback-nordlinger101102.asp
Here are some snippets:
Carters biographer and analyst: "The intifada exposed
the injustice Palestinians suffered, just like Bull
Connors mad dogs in Birmingham."
At their firs
d up. But I believe his presence had more to do with the
hostages coming home than anything Carter did.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 9:32 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: electoral college
Carter released the hostages?
Carter released the hostages? I thought the Dems
claimed Reagan bribed Iran not to release them?
October surprise?
For 444 days Carter did nothing. He even claims today
if he could go back he'd do the same thing.
He was told when to go in with the choppers and do the
rescue and when not to becaus
bah
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:30:58 -0400, Harkins, Patrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whew! long term of office! ;-)
>
>
> >-Original Message-
>
> >What issues during the 1777-1981 administration can people blame on
> >him that were as bad as bush?
>
> Outbound email scanned for virus
lol
>-Original Message-
>From: Jerry Johnson >
>
>Naw, its just that everything that happened before Reagonomics
>saved the country is the Democrats fault.
>
>Jerry Johnson
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/22/04 10:30AM >>>
>whew! long term of office! ;-)
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>
>>W
Naw, its just that everything that happened before Reagonomics saved the country is
the Democrats fault.
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/22/04 10:30AM >>>
whew! long term of office! ;-)
>-Original Message-
>What issues during the 1777-1981 administration can people blame on
>hi
whew! long term of office! ;-)
>-Original Message-
>What issues during the 1777-1981 administration can people blame on
>him that were as bad as bush?
Outbound email scanned for viruses. (e230)
~|
Purchase from Hous
Poor Jimmy Carter.
Jimmy Carter was a peace maker not a warmonger like bush.
I think the one similarity that people are pissed off during the bush
administration and were pissed during carter doesn't mean they are
similar.
What issues during the 1777-1981 administration can people blame on
him
Bill wrote:
> You must nto have done any research into what Jimmy Carter
You're right.
> He was more then just some knucklehead for the past 4 years.
Why is that the greater perception then? I guess that's my point.
Most people didn't like the Carter years. While you can technically
talk him
You must nto have done any research into what Jimmy Carter did because
he was responsible for the Iran Hostages being released. He was
responsible for them not being hurt he told them point blank if you
kill someone we'll invade and if you hurt one of them we'll make sure
you never trade with the o
> Robert wrote:
> It could get very ugly before it is all said and done.
I think it's been ugly since he got to office and I don't mean that as
a partisan shot. I just mean that from day 1 Mr. Bush has been a
divisive figure and things have gone downhill from there.
Yes, we had 9/11, but after 9
Amen. If they won't even get done counting the absentee ballots for a
few days... it could all come down to the provisional ballots.
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:02:31 -0400, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >for sure
> >
> >> predictors are. This is really going to be a nail biter.
>
>
>for sure
>
>> predictors are. This is really going to be a nail biter.
I think there is a 50-50 chance we will not know who won the election for days or even
weeks. Like last time, only this time it looks like both camps are arming for a legal
all-out battle royale over the results in any stat
>Once bush gets thrown out of the white house on his ear by the right
>half of the population
don't you mean the left half?
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF
community.
http
Well, then I am double-cursed! And I am not rich
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott
> Andy wrote:
> All in all, like the Chinese curse: May you live in interesting times.
And
> we, folks, live in very interesting times.
No doubt there. I think the rest of that curse is: may you mar
Once bush gets thrown out of the white house on his ear by the right
half of the population (again) i suppose i will just a little miss the
antics of his crazy administration.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:14:05 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andy wrote:
> > All in all, like the Chines
> Andy wrote:
> All in all, like the Chinese curse: May you live in interesting times. And
> we, folks, live in very interesting times.
No doubt there. I think the rest of that curse is: may you marry a
beautiful woman, may you inherit a fortune.
~~
True. And this election has a lot of unknowns. First, how and how many of
will the newly register young vote. Second, there appears to be a movement
of older blacks to the republican party. Meaning Bush may get 17-19 %
versus 4-5. But for Kerry, this could be significant.
All in all, like the
Given the way the electoral college is structured, to me this sort of
presentation i smore meaningful. The only drawback I've seen in this
sort of poll is that in an individual state the sample size of any one
poll may not be large enough to ensure any real reliability.
larry
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004
for sure
> predictors are. This is really going to be a nail biter.
~|
The annual ColdFusion User Conference is being held Sat 6/26 - Sun 6/27/04 8am-5pm in
the Washington DC Area.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm
The site is very interesting. If you hover over a state, the actual
percentages show. It will be interesting to see how accurate these types of
predictors are. This is really going to be a nail biter.
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney
so... that's good news right?
grin, duck and r
so... that's good news right?
grin, duck and run...
Dana
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:09:13 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same sight, updated. Yesterday it estimated Kerry at 281.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Same sight, updated. Yesterday it estimated Kerry at 281.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 7:05 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: electoral college
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Who said New Mexico was barely Bush? Is t
should have asked for a
statewide recount
Sounds like you agree with me on that?
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:52:31 -0400
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are correct, I was
>I'm with G on this one. Just count the people, count the votes.. Enough with
>the electoral college bullshit.
Read the Federalist Papers for a little historical background on our Constitution and why our government is structured the way it is.
More to the point, it would require an amendment to
Yeah, "Mom rule" is bad. Moving out early is always a good choice.
-Kevin
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:05:23 -0400, Nick McClure
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Electoral College was created to prevent changes in government for light
> and transient causes, something the founding fathers were very con
tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:29 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
On the statute...thank you. But doesnt this "entire geographic
jurisdiction" language apply to local elections? Actually, though, it
doesn't matter, because that
ion of the current language at some point too.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:12:46 -0400
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OK, here is the state law:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K
better chance to get more votes.
_
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
interesting. I have never seen this interpretation. You sure about
that part about the partial recount not being allowed
Message -
From: dana tierney
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
hehe.
I have often said that South San Antonio might was well be in Mexico
:) LOL. For those unfamiliar, that's about what, 175 miles long and 30
miles
Jul 2004 19:39:34 -0400
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When the ballot is not clear you are allowing the ballot to be interpreted
by people who may have an agenda. The laws in the state of Florida only
allow for a full statewide recount, Gore didn
hehe :)
- Original Message -
From: Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:40:59 -0500
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am sure he thinks so as well. :-)
- Original Message -
From: dana tierney
he
I am sure he thinks so as well. :-)
- Original Message -
From: dana tierney
he should have asked for a statewide recount. I agree. I think :)
Dana
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
dont realize, Beaumont is an old Louisiana-type town in
the far SE of the state. Amarillo is in the northwest in the panhandle
and and is cattle country.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:29:10 -0500
Subject: Re: Electoral College
s then the Electors for Governor Bush would have
been
_
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
All of the votes were not counted.
If Democrats caused votes to not be counted, that is wrong. If
R
the
Band Plays on.
We will probably see more of this in November if the election is close.
- Original Message -
From: dana tierney
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
I remember the Texas gerrymandering :) weren't
he should have asked for a statewide recount. I agree. I think :)
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:22:57 -0400
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simple, when the standards for
thus the intent of the voters would not be
judged equally.
_
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:20 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
how can the intent of the voter not be constitutional? As I recall
there was an issue about
aud?
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:20:12 -0500
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This year the gerrymandering took place in Texas and Colorado - spearheaded by
Representative Ton DeLay, R
-0400
Subject: RE: Electoral College
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To me all your (very valid reasons) are exactly why we need the concessions
we have for state population in the Legislative branch (and why our
legislative branch is so comparatively complex), but not (I think) in the
Exec
This year the gerrymandering took place in Texas and Colorado - spearheaded by
Representative Ton DeLay, R-TX
There is a battle going on already on voter fraud in one of the few remaining
Democratic districts.
I believe we will see much more to come soon.
- Original Message -
From:
-0500
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nah, I've never heard of a clean campaign.
No, I mean actually managing the voting properly. Not busing in students from
out of state, no multiple voting, no extending polling times when it looked
like
does not stand up to scrutiny.
imho :)
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:46:28 -0500
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok, wrong term(damn, I am suffering from Bus
Andy
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
you mean in terms of a clean campaign? Probably not; it's a big
country. But what does that have to do with whether
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:46:28 -0500
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok, wrong term(damn, I am suffering from Bush-idis). How about "funny
business". I believe that one or more of the democraticall
ednesday, July 28, 2004 2:52 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
Good to tangle with you again
Question: Did the democrats across run a lily clean election? Or, just
focus
on Florida. Wasn't there something about Military ballets, for example.
Andy
Republicans in power down there?
Not in the districts that had the problems.
>
> Dana
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:52:28 -0500
> Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
> To: CF
Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
There was something about military ballots. I'd have to look it up,
but there was something. However, aren't you assuming that those votes
would have been republican? And uh... correct me i
ida court
> to review, it found that their reason for allowing the recounts was not
> Constitutional and that they must issue a ruling that satisfied the
> constitution.
>
>
>
> _
>
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 200
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:27 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
stop the gerrymandering?
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:32:54 -0500
Subject: RE: Electoral
licans in power down there?
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:52:28 -0500
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Good to tangle with you again
Question: Did the democrats across run
Message -
> From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- Sandy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Didn't
ly 28, 2004 2:27 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
stop the gerrymandering?
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:32:54 -0500
Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTE
not
Constitutional and that they must issue a ruling that satisfied the
constitution.
_
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
Negative. Florida law, already established in a previous
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
