S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
I'm just saying that if the table being inserted into
contains a
no what you said was any session cross the server. that's
wrong.
I was pretty sure I had corrected myself, but that's neither here nor
there...
Do you not consider Oracle a major db? Oracle has
Hi,
I am retooling a large CF site and need to append the CFID and CFTOKEN to each
request as XPSP2 has locked out a lot of users who aren't allowing cookies.
There are too many pages to start digging through the links and forms to add
the URLTOKEN (unless I really need to). Is it not possible
Jamie
what you need?
Cheers
Marco
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 21:25:39 -0400, Jamie Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that this sounds like a pretty wild problem, but I would REALLY
appreciate any help you guys could give - I've been putting my head through a
wall for about two weeks trying
I'm going to bring this one in from the Blackstone Beta thread yesterday
because I think we all need to talk about this. I'm not going to rehash most of
what's been said in that thread.
ASP.NET is taking market away from CF! WHY? Will Blackstone fix the shift
that's taking place? I say no! CF
If you want a ColdFusion solution, then try my BlogFusion: www.countersinkdg.com
Jake
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics
http://www.cfdynamics.com
Message:
The price of one copy of CF Pro Server and DW MX 2004 is about the
cost of one copy of Visual Studio Enterprise Developer.
-joe
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 08:53:45 -0400, Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ferrari's are fussy and very expensive to run so that's probably a
very good analogy...
Can't Visual Studio be had via some of M$'s programs along with a ton
of other software and at a rather large discount? I once recall
someone pointing out how M$ wants developers so that their server
products get used more and because of this that is why they make it
possible to get the
Or if you cant host it yourself, try http://www.blogger.com
Regards
Mark Drew
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:56:45 -0500, Joe Rinehart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog/ - my tools - blog
download it, read the readme, be happily blogging in a few minutes.
On
Will,
This is probably not a good place for this discussion. It's CF-Talk,
not CF-Bash.
ASP.NET is taking market away from CF! WHY?
Are you sure? Do you have numbers for that? Either way, you're
probably right, but if so, can you show that it's for any
technological reasons other than the
Jamie Price wrote:
...which is close, but no cigar. I need to get rid of those 'blank' entries,
plus I need to arrange it so what's left comes out like this:
Quote:
UserID: 3
Owns Cards: 41001152
UserID: 8
Owns Cards: 41001151
UserID: 9
Owns Cards: 41001151
UserID: 13
I thought I would research this a bit
A Server + Development tools
CF MX 6.1 Enterprise: US $ 5999 (you get a $100 rebate at the moment so $5899)
Dreamweaver MX US $ 399 (and you get a $100 on this too!)
Total: $6198
.NET
Visual Studio .NET 2003 Enterprise Architect $1,799 US
or
Visual
Hey Aaron,
Yep, there are discount programs. They require a small portion of your soul :)
Actually, yes, MS is trying to make things more accessible. There are
light versions of VS 2005 Beta available for free, and there are
programs like MSDN that have a price tag attached.
On Sun, 12 Dec
Is a web service feasible for sensitive data? Like passing sensitive data to
the service?
I don't know enough about them, but I'd think not.
Thanks,
Will
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor -
The price of one copy of CF Pro Server and DW MX 2004 is about the
cost of one copy of Visual Studio Enterprise Developer.
I don't use Visual Studio, I use Web matrix, which is free.
Let's talk about deployment instead
Does 6K ring a bell?
Heheheh, I think I'll pass, Jochem.
Your comment proves a point I should've made stronger - up-front
software license costs are fluid, and not a very good basis for
decision making.
-joe
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:51:06 +0100, Jochem van Dieten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Rinehart wrote:
The
6k? If you're an organization that actually needs CF Enterprise, it
shouldn't be a very big bell.
See my reply to Jochem.
-joe
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 10:58:43 -0400, Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The price of one copy of CF Pro Server and DW MX 2004 is about the
cost of one copy of
Your comment proves a point I should've made stronger - up-front
software license costs are fluid, and not a very good basis for
decision making.
There's the rub with CF. I agree with what you're saying, but then I have to
explain to my small-medium sized clients this concept. You have to SELL
What Mike said super-important. Its something I learned way back when
I was writing ad copy and building the ads (in Xerox Ventura Publisher
1.0; running on that super-cool GEM gui).
People perceive mixed case text strings one word at a time. They
perceive all caps one letter at a time.
I think it could be because people are being sold on .NET everywhere they look.
Why are you only selling people on enterprise? Most small and medium
places are _fine_ with cf pro.
-joe
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 11:21:58 -0400, Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your comment proves a point I
Rick,
CFFM only disallows extensions? It doesn't do MIME checking? As in
cffile's ACCEPT parameter?
The uploader I wrote for FCK 1.x added mime type checking. Rather
than disallowing a specific list, it was then able to only *allow* a
specific list. Not the same thing and a better way to go
Joe Rinehart wrote:
The price of one copy of CF Pro Server and DW MX 2004 is about the
cost of one copy of Visual Studio Enterprise Developer.
The only relevant question when comparing prices is Who do you
want to be cheaper?.
I can easily argue that Eclipse, Linux, PostgreSQL and Bluedragon
Matt Robertson wrote:
CFFM only disallows extensions? It doesn't do MIME checking? As in
cffile's ACCEPT parameter?
Since the browser is really what determines the mime type, couldn't I
configure my system to think that .cfm files were of type image/jpeg?
Thus allowing me to upload .cfm
Will Tomlinson wrote:
I'm going to bring this one in from the Blackstone Beta thread yesterday
because I think we all need to talk about this. I'm not going to rehash most
of what's been said in that thread.
Glad you're not planning on going over what was said yesterday. There
was very
Thanks so much Barney.
Will
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics
http://www.cfdynamics.com
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:187274
Archives:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 10:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Blackstone Beta
What else would you need? (ok.. windows server licence and Database
but you need this for both anyway so we dont add it to the mix)
Just
But isn't the CFFILE ACCEPT parameter a more sound way to govern file
acceptability than a simple extension check? Sure on any given day
anything can be spoofed, but someone with a much higher knowledge
level would have to be making the attempt.
I've seen literally dozens of attempts to send up
-Original Message-
From: Joe Rinehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 11:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Blackstone Beta
6k? If you're an organization that actually needs CF Enterprise, it
shouldn't be a very big bell.
Yes - I would agree. I've seen
In the home directory/configuration/app options there are three checkboxes.
They are normally turned on and seem to only have anything to do with Asp. Is
there any known reason to have them checked on if the server is set to CF only
(all asp type extensions removed)?
I'm finalizing the move to
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 08:16:04 -0400, Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not going to rehash most of what's been said in that thread.
Er, sure you are. You even repeated Tim Uzzanti's quote *in* *full*!
It's not a case of right or wrong, just that you're not going to get
everyone to agree
I have an application where the user selects a record via a key
lookup, and then that record is displayed individually. From there I
want to be able to click a '' button to go to the previous record in
the sequence, or a '' to go to the next record, and continue to
select records via this
Thanks Barney, thats *exactly* what I was looking for!
--
--Matt Robertson--
President, Janitor
MSB Designs, Inc.
mysecretbase.com
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 11:12:27 -0800, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for, but if it's SQL, I've
done this in
Just a few comments.
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 7:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF vs ASP.NET! GET YOUR FRESH POPCON!!
I'm going to bring this one in from the Blackstone Beta thread yesterday
because I think
I might be off my rocker - but are you implying that you are using cookie as
the Default Storage Mechanism for Client Sessions? Could I suggest instead that
you run all your client session requirements to a database instead?
I know that to create Search Engine Friendly URLs (
Quick question...are ya using DreamweaverMX?
Nope. Another complication I didn't mentuion before is the user has
the ability to select which index is current, so they might be
indexing on ID, and cycling up and down thru the numbers, or one of
several other fields, such as Last Name. I'm
Will Tomlinson wrote:
Thanks so much Barney.
What Barney just said.
Some of them will use unencrypted HTTP, others will use standard HTTP
(SSL) security. Some in fact, like PayPals WS API I just wrote a Java
CFX to interface with will use custom security protocols. Just depends
how it was
Both platforms have their own good and bad issues. I have been using CF since
the first versions and since the .NET platform was marketed (and the management
board showed twinkeling eyes, hey another Microsoft cashcow) also started using
C#. I like both, unfortunately management has problems
I am not going to get sucked into a flame war here, but this one line just
begged a response ...
Blackstone is not equivalent to .NET in power and performance.
Did you, by any chance, mean to compare J2EE to .NET, or were you really
displaying such an amazing lack of understanding as to what
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z z
*meemeemeemeemee*
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z
*meemeemeemeemee*
***BUZ***
Wha?!? Hnh? OK I'm awake ... Whats going on? ... Oh.
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z
*meemeemeemeemee*
non-expert opinion: afaik there is no difference. The wizard generates
the same code. It is just easier and probably less prone to error. On
the other hand TSQL may offer more flexibility, not sure.
Dana
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:30:07 -0600, Eric Creese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When setting up
I saw someone asking if someone could prove .NET is faster, .. haven't
you seen any benchmarks? My diff algorithm (using levensthein) is
about 1000x faster in .NET and the CF code has been finetuned into
it's most optimal form. CF ofcourse has it's plusses or else I would
not use it, but
I dont think anyone with enough knowledge says Java is slow :) In fact, .NET
currently is slower than Java which is pretty funny compared to the wrapper
(around win32) .NET actually is, compared to Java which has to do all on his
own. (btw.. benches: http://www.shudo.net/jit/perf/).
Nobody
Hey guys,
I posted this on Friday, didn't get a response. Figured I'd try it again.
I have a simple text file that I want to force-download for users of a web
application. I've set up the following code:
cfheader
name=Content-Disposition
value=attachment; filename=#filename#
cfcontent
I'm going to bring this one in from the Blackstone Beta thread yesterday
because I think we all need to talk about this.
Why? I thought this was a technical discussion list? If this were a list
about, say, Porsches, would it be appropriate to talk about how much better
Ferraris are? (Oh, and by
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:00:56 -0400, Micha Schopman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think anyone with enough knowledge says Java is slow :) In fact, .NET
currently is slower than Java which is pretty funny compared to the wrapper
(around win32) .NET actually is, compared to Java which has to
There are other factors that one needs to think about
when writing an
application. Think about the ability to use Threads in
.NET. Depending
on your application, sitting and processing 10 requests
back to back may
take 5 minutes but if you had the ability to run the 10
tasks
concurrently
I'm sure you're rocker is fine.
I am using non-persistant session cookies for session management, not
persistant cookies.
A few members installed XPSP2 and it apparently disables all cookies,
persistant ant not, so that can login but the session cookie fails to be set,
and they get punted
There are a few DHTML widgets and they are not working
properly in FF.
For example the following is some of the code behind one
DHTML widget:
document.onmouseover = ItemOver;
var eOld = null;
function ItemOver()
{
var eSrc = window.event.srcElement;
if (eSrc != null eSrc.className
I have a simple text file that I want to force-download for
users of a web application. I've set up the following code:
cfheader
name=Content-Disposition
value=attachment; filename=#filename#
cfcontent
type=text/plain
file=#filepath#
deletefile=no
When I run the code in
In the home directory/configuration/app options there are
three checkboxes. They are normally turned on and seem to
only have anything to do with Asp. Is there any known reason
to have them checked on if the server is set to CF only (all
asp type extensions removed)?
Those options only
I don't want to start another browser war thread, but the last few
days I was looking into moving some of our (intranet) apps to FF. Our
policy is to have only IE on desktops, but I would be very happy if I
can get rid of IE and move to FF.
Unfortunately there is no budget of even desire for this
I wonder if using large numbers of concurrent threads is helping performance
regarding web sites/apps in any case. If a server is processing 100 pages
that all take the same time to deliver a limited queue would improve
performance because the pages that have finished would be delivered in
batches
I am using non-persistant session cookies for session management, not
persistant cookies.
Actually, in terms of the issue you are having, it wouldn't really matter. Even
if you use client variables in the database, Cold Fusion still uses the CFID
and CFTOKEN to identify the client. So they
Thanks.
Any known savings?
Those options only affect classic ASP. You can safely disregard them - it
doesn't matter how they're set.
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
Thanks Isaac,
I have implemented the second part and it's working fine.
I am working now on the first one. There is actually one function for
all the events:
document.onmouseout = ItemOut;
document.onmousedown = ItemDown;
document.onmouseup = ItemUp;
Thanks again.
Victor
PS One more thing:
Regarding the relative costs of the expensive ColdFusion and the
free other technologies, I have a statement from a colleague in
another organisation, which I'll be posting separately. I told him
about a site I'd just about finished in ColdFusion and he told me he
was amazed. That I'd done my
Matt Robertson wrote:
If I'm understanding you right and you're only doing extension checks
it just seems that you're not using an important feature of cffile.
Using both features would be ideal but on a given day with a typical
user I'd say cffile accept= was a lot more powerful piece of
Interesting. So how are people coding for this? Determine the browser
and then have two dimensions?
I was wondering if M$ is doing this on purpose or just doesn't care.
Thanks Barney
Victor
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:46:13 -0800, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IE incorrectly
Any known savings?
Not unless you're using ASP.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
Apologies for the WOT - please e-mail me off list if you have any clues.
Is it possible to port games written in Flash to other game consoles
e.g. Xbox, Playstation, Nintendo etc
++
Kevin Parker
Web Services Manager
WorkCover Corporation
p: 08 8233 2548
m: 0418 806 166
e: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 10:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SOT moving to FireFox
I was wondering if M$ is doing this on purpose or just doesn't care.
I doubt they are doing it on purpose. I think it's just they just
Take a look at the post on leftjustified.net on the topic where they
tear down the box model and start from scratch universally:
http://leftjustified.net/journal/2004/10/19/global-ws-reset/
Adam Howitt
http://www.webdevref.com
Rob wrote:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:04:20 -0500, Victor Moore
I think you're a bit off...
I could be wrong, but it's been my impression that when a thread
finishes processing, it delivers any undelivered content from the
buffer immediately and then grabs up the next incoming http request.
So nobody's actually waiting for someone else's thread to finsih,
cfset myCom = CreateObject('Component','myComponent') /
cfset myCom(Blah,Blah,Blah) /
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Cowling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 13 December 2004 3:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Coldfusion tag prefixes
Is it all possible to create your own tag prefix?
IE incorrectly implements the CSS box model, while FF (and other
browsers) gets it right. Specifically, IE assumes the width you
specify is for the actual content area of the elements box, while the
CSS spec says that the width you specify is for the entire box
(including padding, border, and
take a look at cfimport.
Doug
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:48:56 +1100, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cfset myCom = CreateObject('Component','myComponent') /
cfset myCom(Blah,Blah,Blah) /
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Cowling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 13
sorry, typo..
cfimport prefix=name taglib=setName.cfm
name:setName fname=Steve
and in setName.cfm
cfinvoke component=MyComponent method=setName
cfinvokeargument name=firstname value=arguments.fname /
/cfinvoke
gives me:
Unknown tag: name:setName.
ColdFusion cannot determine how to
There are a few CSS parsing bugs that are unique to IE as well. You
can use those to easily specify both dimensions. For example, IE will
transparently ignore // comment in stylesheets, while Mozilla
correctly recognizes the invalid syntax and ignores through the end of
the rule. That lets you
the 'taglib' attribute to CFIMPORT is a directory. You then reference
the files in the directory using the prefix. So if you do this:
cfimport prefix=name taglib=path/to/my/custom/tags /
then you can call the custom tag named mytag.cfm inside the
path/to/my/custom/tags directory like this:
Is it all possible to create your own tag prefix? Instead of using cf_
to get to custom tags.
the reason I ask, is to try and reduce the amount of
cfinvoke component=myComponent method=setBlah
cfinvokeargument name=blah
cfinvokeargument name2=blah
cfinvokeargument name3=blah
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 11:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP.NET! GET YOUR FRESH POPCON!!
I think you're a bit off...
I think that the original poster might be confusing two separate things
here:
Hmmm I have been looking at cfimport, but I may be trying to do
something it was never intended to do.
ie.
cfimport prefix=name taglib=name.cfm
name:set argument=value
and in name.cfm it invokes a component, passing the argument value.
But I get this error:
Could not import the tag library
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:02:18 -0500, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure how this will be implemented in BlackStone - Isaac's post was
the first I'd heard of it. But it is doable in Java (of course) and it
wouldn't be all that hard to create a CFC to kick something like this off in
Hi all
need an help in requlaer expression
i have a string like this
'this is samp'le data to in'sert'
now i need to replace the like this usign regular expression
'this is samp''le data to in''sert'
~|
Special thanks to
Ahhh.. OK. I'll give that a go.
thanks all.
Barney Boisvert wrote:
the 'taglib' attribute to CFIMPORT is a directory. You then reference
the files in the directory using the prefix. So if you do this:
cfimport prefix=name taglib=path/to/my/custom/tags /
then you can call the custom
After sending this I realized I was AMAZINGLY unclear on the first
paragraph. What I should have said was something like this :
IE has some parsing bugs that can make this easier. For example, if
you use a // for a one-line comment (a syntax that CSS does NOT
support), IE will read the slashes,
Ferrari's are fussy and very expensive to run so that's probably a
very good analogy...
Sean,
Are you saying CF isn't fussy? And CF isn't more expensive than .NET? I'd
really love to know.
~|
Special thanks to the CF
A web service is exactly the same as a normal web request, except
that they're designed to be made by machines, and not web browsers.
They're not any more or less secure than any interaction over the web.
So if a given piece of data is exchanged with a normal client (i.e.
a user with a browser),
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 10:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Blackstone Beta
Your comment proves a point I should've made stronger - up-front
software license costs are fluid, and not a very good basis for
ASP.NET is taking market away from CF!
I doubt you can substantiate that. CF's market share appears to have shrunk
from the old 2.0 and 3.0 days, but there's been a lot more going on than
ASP.NET. In fact, ASP.NET is a minor blip on CF's radar when compared to the
giant swarm of open-source
I have an application where the user selects a record via a key
lookup, and then that record is displayed individually. From there I
want to be able to click a '' button to go to the previous record in
the sequence, or a '' to go to the next record, and continue to
select records via this method
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for, but if it's SQL, I've
done this in the past:
SELECT *
FROM table
WHERE id #currentId#
ORDER BY id DESC
LIMIT 1
for getting the previous item. Just flipt the to and make the
order ASC to get next record. The LIMIT clause is MySQL's version of
MS
81 matches
Mail list logo
