That's correct. BlueDragon currently only supports Flex remoting via web
services.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> On Friday 28 Mar 2008, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> > Yes, Transfer works on BlueDragon 7.0.1.
>
> Cool.
> But BlueDragon doesn't have su
Yes, Transfer works on BlueDragon 7.0.1.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Commmunications, LLC
> Does this work yet ?
> What about Transfer on BlueDragon ?
> --
> Tom Chiverton
> Helping to autoschediastically bully low-risk meta-services
> on: http://thefalk
BlueDragon 7.0.1:
- ModelGlue
- ColdSpring
- Reactor
- Transfer ORM
- CFUnit
- FarCry
Regards,
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the
I see. I was confusing his question with placing a CFC in the Session scope,
where it's implicity serialized if you have "J2EE Sessions" enabled. I don't
think this will work with the Client scope unless you explicitly (manually)
serialize the CFC yourself.
Vince
>> Even if CF8 can serialize C
Even if CF8 can serialize CFCs (I've read that it can), I don't think you can
store complex variables in the Client scope. I'd assume that a serialized CFC
would be considered a complex variable.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
>> I read somewhere that in
"Integrating CFML with
ASP.NET" document:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/docs/7_0/BlueDragon_70_Integrating_CFML_with_ASPNET.pdf
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
~|
Creat
arate Windows
process--you can see this in the Services control panel or task manager--and
this process does not provide any integration with ASP.NET. In contrast,
BlueDragon.NET is implemented entirely on top of (within?) the ASP.NET runtime.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
>H
/the-tasty-morsels-found-in-dogfood-mscom-ops-top-10-changes-in-iis7-0.aspx
I'm not a person who tends to have stong feelings about desktop operating
systems. The best reason I can think to run Vista--and the only reason I
switched from Windows XP--is to do development on IIS 7.0.
Regards,
V
roup, November 15, 2007
- Atlanta CFUG, January 2008
- CFUNITED Europe 2008, March 12-13 2008
Let me know if you're interested in having me give this presentation to your
local CFUG.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
~~
>Vince - just out of curiousity, if I've got a bunch of code doing this:
>
>
>
>and in some cases it's empty string and others it's null - would that
>code FAIL to wkr as expected under Bluedragon because null neq ""?
>
That code will work exactly as expected under BlueDragon 7.0. For backwards
c
FYI, that code does work in BlueDragon 7.0, which can distinguish between nulls
and empty strings, and supports the "null" keyword:
http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=5C2377F1-534E-5920-D87611A2FB9BE5EC
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.
Dave Watts wrote:
>
>There is,
>however, a problem with people making uninformed decisions based on what
>these "web agencies" recommend without any sort of ROI evaluation.
>
Yes, agreed. I guess I was responding to your comment that, "I would be happy
to tell your boss that he should put down th
oint out that BlueDragon.NET can be very effective in helping you migrate from
CF to .NET while preserving your investment in CFML code:
http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=9DFBA97F-124C-10CB-361E10851B
4-6 weeks, so expect the
BlueDragon 7.0.1 final release in late October or early November.
As always, pre-release (beta) software is intended for testing and
evaluation purposes only; do not use the BlueDragon 7.0.1 beta or any
pre-release software in production environments.
Regards,
Vince Bonfanti
N
I downloaded your DLL and ran it successfully on BlueDragon.NET, including the
following:
#math.Add( 2, 2 )#
This at least tells you that your DLL is built properly, and the problem's
somewhere else.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
>Following on from the Sim
Sean wrote:
>
> I will, of course, try BD 7.0.1, but would
> request that you try the Mac install with Apple's Java 6 Developer
> Preview (as well as the regular Java 5). Thanx!
Will do. We've added this to our project plan.
Vince Bonfanti
htt
install on my MacBook Pro. The installer gets to
> "Configuring..." and then just quits :(
Sorry to hear that. Did we drop the ball on our end, or did you just give up?
Let me know if you decide to try again wit
>
>like BlueDragon, it does not support Transfer ORM
>which is a deal-breaker for me since I use that framework on all of my
>projects.
>
Hi Sean,
Transfer ORM is supported in BD 7.0.1. We're wrapping up testing this week and
plan to release a public beta next week.
> Larry
>
> Why move at all? I mean, the reason you would upgrade is to get
> features you dont currently have. Saying you will move to another
> engine which .. err.. last time I looked, didnt have those features,
> well, go for it!
Here's a possible reason: suppose he needs to deploy on JBoss a
Language Version" selection feature).
CFEclipse remains my personal CFML editor of choice, which I use almost daily.
Cheers,
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
>I thought I would mention that (this is not an official statement so
>you know)
; implementation. Compared to BD.NET, the CF8
Java-to-.NET bridge will not perform as well, will have some limitations on the
types of .NET objects you can create, and does not integrate with ASP.NET.
Vince Bonfanti
New A
hy?
>
> If anyone has this come up, mine was a comment in the middle of a
> multi-line cfif in the search sql. Maybe bluedragon didn't like that.
I'd be interested in seeing the code that failed. Can you email it to me
separate? vince[at]ne
or
WebLogic or JBoss you'll get different answers. Other than JBoss, which is open
source, I doubt the other vendors are going to reveal their algorithms for
generating unique session IDs.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> I can't seem to find an answer to this any
and is why BlueDragon will support WebLogic 10 as soon as
> it ships next month (while CFMX is only adding support for WebLogic 9.
> 2 in Scorpio sometime later in 2007, more than two full years after
> BlueDragon supported WebLogic 9.0).
>
> There are real, tangible differences
WebLogic 9.0).
There are real, tangible differences in the two produce offerings.
Vince
>On 2/21/07, Vince Bonfanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> But we quibble, since BlueDragon remains the only CFML engine officially
>> supported by BEA (and, in fact, BlueDragon
profile customers who
> run ColdFusion on WebLogic). The current version (CFMX7) supports
> WebLogic 7 and 8.1. And yes, WebLogic 9.2 support is indeed planned
> for ColdFusion "Scorpio" (aka CF8).
>
> --- Ben
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
#x27;s tested,
> sold, and supported directly by BEA:
>
> http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=index.
> htm&FP=/content/products/weblogic/bluedragon/
>
> Vince Bonfanti
> New Atlanta Communications, LLC
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > The company i
Your other option is to use the only CFML server engine that's tested, sold,
and supported directly by BEA:
http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=index.htm&FP=/content/products/weblogic/bluedragon/
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> Hello All,
>
> The
Since you're an MS house, you may also want to look at BlueDragon.NET, which is
a ColdFusion-compatible server implemented in 100% .NET, which gives you great
integration with IIS, ASP.NET, and SQL Server:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm
Vince Bonfanti
New At
New in BlueDragon 7.0 document for details on
all of these features.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion informati
take this discussion offline, or have someone call
you with more info.
Regards,
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
>It might possibly have been an option before the money was spent, but
>I'm not a fan of doubling up on costs. I'd rather try to fix or get a
>fix for what I&
Tom, Dan,
Since you're both running Windows 2003 and SQL Server, is BlueDragon.NET an
option to consider?
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Pretty much everyone running CF/Windows/SQL S
ed at CFUNITED (and on my blog
just prior to that). I'll post a short, polite message to this list when the
beta is available for download.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
>I had no idea BD 7 was already released. The latest I can find on your site
>is 6.2.1.
>
&g
new CFTHREAD tag in BD 7.0:
> >
> > http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.
> > cfm?mode=entry&entry=152A1ECC-B7C2-5C0D-4269B203A722C055
> >
> > Vince Bonfanti
> > New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> >
> > > I am aware (somewhat!) of the asynchronous Web
Hmmm...sounds like a perfect use of the new CFTHREAD tag in BD 7.0:
http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=152A1ECC-B7C2-5C0D-4269B203A722C055
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> I am aware (somewhat!) of the asynchronous Web services capability
> wi
to migrate any portions of the site to
.NET.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, del
To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: BEA licenses BlueDragon for WebLogic
>
> what does this have to do with coldfusion?
>
> just wondering?
>
> On 4/17/06, Vince Bonfanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BEA has announced that they've licensed BlueDragon to resell wit
.newatlanta.com/index.cfm
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:237928
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Sub
Hi Dave,
No problem. I'm told I'm way too defensive on that topic, so I'm sure any
misinterpretation of your comments is my fault.
Regarding Flash Remoting on BD, WebORB comes in both Java and .NET versions
and supports Flash Remoting on BlueDragon (both Java/J2EE and .NET
editions), in addition
Subject: Re: Ajax and CFCs
>
> On 8/15/05, Vince Bonfanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Once you realize it's the WebORB server that's actually
> invoking CFCs
> > (on behalf of the client), and not the client invoking CFCs
> directly,
> > then it
OK, sorry, I'll try to tone down the "huffy, puffy" part.
The pages running on BlueDragon.NET are all ".cfm" pages, just as would be
running on CF5. So you can't tell which pages are running CF5 and which are
running BD.NET just by looking at the file extension (in fact, there's no
way for you to
"a few pages here and there"?! MySpace is serving 7.5 *billion* page views
per month. Their web server farm consists of several *hundred* servers.
Those are numbers that some people seem simply unable to comprehend. Heck,
just the servers running BD.NET (still the minority on MySpace) are probably
No one from New Atlanta ever said that. The only people who say we said that
are people who wish to discredit us.
Vince
> -Original Message-
> From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 6:09 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: bg & myspace
>
> I think people were
ing to take several weeks (months, maybe) to
> convert the entire site. The problems you're seeing are due
> to CF5 and are the reason the site it being upgraded to
> BD.NET. You'll know the upgrade to BD.NET is complete when
> these problems go away.
>
> Posted By Vince
Sean's statement that MySpace is "not (running) BlueDragon" is blatantly,
factually false. Here is New Atlanta's original press release about MySpace:
http://www.newatlanta.com/corporate/news/myspace_announce.jsp
Here is my original blog entry regarding the announcement (sorry for the
wrap-arou
MySpace is running BlueDragon.NET and has been since prior to our
announcement. Why would you think otherwise?
Vince
> -Original Message-
> From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 4:32 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: bg & myspace
>
> Vince,
> I am in no way tr
your
JavaScript. You really should take a look at it.
Vince
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 3:51 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Ajax and CFCs
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Vinc
http://blog.newatlanta.com/weborb/examples/richclientprimer/javascript-ajax/
phonebook-bluedragon.cfm
WebORB makes handling the other CFML complex types (arrays and structs) just
as easy.
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlant
alls when I can easily use CF's
> built in Flash gateway or open source AMF-based alternatives?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 15, 2005 8:21 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE:
CF's
> built in Flash gateway or open source AMF-based alternatives?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 15, 2005 8:21 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Ajax and CFCs
>
> I
invoke objects that reside on the same local
server--the performance is much better to invoke them directly.
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
Jim,
The WebORB implementation doesn't use SOAP or web services to invoke CFCs on
BlueDragon--instead, WebORB invokes them directly via BlueDragon's internal
APIs.
Also, WebORB works with both the Java/J2EE and .NET editions of BlueDragon.
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
N
WebORB uses proprietary internal BlueDragon APIs to invoke CFCs directly (we
worked very closely with the WebORB developers to make this work). I suppose
it could be made to work with CFMX in a similar manner, but so far the
WebORB developers have chosen not to do so.
Vince Bonfanti
http
required
to invoke other server-side objects and services (Java objects, .NET
objects, web services, etc.). WebORB also enables Flash Remoting for
BlueDragon.
There are live demos of WebORB on my blog:
http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=A49151F3-CC13-10D9-CF9
78A54402ECFEE
V
(1) I'm over thirty, so I guess I qualify as an old fart (my kids think so).
(2) I'm married, but is 44 still young?
(3) Moved out of the cave a few years ago.
I guess that gets me 1-1/2 out of three, but I had never heard of MySpace
either until they contacted us a few months ago...
Vince
> --
According to comScore Media Metrix (see the link Rey offers below), the top
five in May 2005 are:
1. Yahoo
2. MSN
3. AOL
4. eBay
5. MySpace
The comScore Media Metrix report is used to set advertising rates, sort of
the "Nielsen ratings of the web."
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newa
Anyone can write a lab benchmark to get any result they want. That's why you
should never trust lab benchmarks, especially from vendors (even New
Atlanta, which is why we never publish any). The MySpace testing was all
done on real-world code in their real-world production environment.
All of their tests were done using the exact same CFML code in their
production environment. These were "real world" tests--as real as it
gets--these were not lab benchmarks. (Nobody has a lab that can generate the
kind of traffic they get in production).
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newa
, the very first customer to deploy on BlueDragon.NET switched from
CFMX.
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Kerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 10:35 AM
>
Your best bet is a product called Lasso:
http://www.omnipilot.com/
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mizzell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 200
/index.cfm
Look for an announcement at CFUNITED (www.cfunited.org) about major
companies that are running BlueDragon.NET, and come visit our booth if you
happen to be there.
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Origi
Hi Damien,
I read more of Bryan's comments, as you suggested, and I think he's a loon
and doesn't know what he's talking about. The original licensing and 2003
re-licensing of Java by Microsoft was done to allow MS to continue to
distribute their version of Java (which they're no longer allowed to
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:49 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Regarding Java and .NET's incestuous ties, and
> Windows' future
>
> On 5/27/05, Vince Bonfanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:07 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Regarding Java and .NET's incestuous ties, and
> Windows' future
>
>
> > These two statements of his strike me as utter foolishness:
> >
> > "...beca
MS's cash reserves have dropped from 60 to 30 billion because they've been
giving it their stockholders as dividends, not because they're losing money
(they're not--MS continues to be the most profitable company in the history
of the world). And don't forget that it took the Roman Empire over 400 y
Who is Bryan J. Smith? These two statements of his strike me as utter
foolishness:
"...because .NET 2.0 is based on Java 1.4 (thanx to Microsoft's recent
re-license), whereas .NET 1.1 is based on Java 1.1..."
"...once Marc left last year, I think that was the sign that Microsoft
is over a
No, we haven't created one, and we're not aware of one. Currently, the best
tool for doing both CFML and ASP.NET development might be DreamWeaver.
There's also an IDE call PrimalCode that supports both CFML and ASP.NET:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/tools/default.aspx
Vinc
CFUNITED-05 is going to be a great event. We should be thankful to all the
sponsors (yes, New Atlanta is one) for making this event possible, instead
of disparaging them.
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Origi
d, yes, the upgrade should be quick and painless. Plus, you can then take
advantage of new features such as CFCs and Web Services, and integration
with JSPs and the underlying Java/J2EE platform.
Again, let me know if you'd like to arrange a conference call to discuss
this in more detail.
V
The best way around this issue is to run BlueDragon/J2EE, which fully supports
vertical and horizontal clustering in WebSphere Network Deployment
configurations.
Let me know if you'd like to discuss this in more detail.
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
New Atlanta Communica
other advantage of
ASP.NET (and BlueDragon.NET) over CFMX or the Java/J2EE editions of
BlueDragon.
Again, I'm presenting a talk a CFUNITED that covers all of these topics (the
talk is specifically focused on Windows Server 2003 and IIS 6.0, so some of
the points you bring up about IIS 5.0 won&#
m each other.
It just so happens that I'm working on my CFUNITED presentation on exactly
this topic right now:
http://www.cfunited.com/topics.cfm#168
Vince Bonfanti
http://blog.newatlanta.com
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
Hmmm...IIS may be crappy in other respects (though I personally don't think
it is), but not regarding performance. It's fairly easy to demonstrate that
IIS is as much as an order of magnitude (10 times) faster than Apache, for
example, on equivalent hardware. Knowing this, the Apache developers hav
think "sales" is number 1 on the menu).
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:15 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Upgrade discou
nd get the word to them. If you're not a member of that subset,
that's fine, I have no argument with you. But, if you're trying to imply the
no one in the current population of CFML developers is better served by
BlueDragon, then that's where we'll disagree.
Vince Bonfan
A follow-up to the integration question: support for mobile devices and
internationalization tends to be much stronger in ASP.NET than J2EE. These
are two key features that are pulling some of our lead BD.NET customers
towards .NET.
Note everyone is interested in these two features, and there are
s both CFML and ASP.NET:
http://www.sapien.com/primalcode.aspx
So there's no reason at all to think you're forced to change your
development tools or use Visual Studio when developing for BlueDragon.NET.
>
> Thanks,
> Calvin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vince
Thanks, but I can't take credit or blame for coining LAMBDA. I don't know
who was the first person to use that term, but it was done entirely
independently of New Atlanta.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
http://blog.newatlanta.com
> -Ori
ould (and,
yes, there's going to be a lot of great speakers and sessions about CFMX 7,
too--it's not a BlueDragon show).
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
That's the question raised in my new blog (hint: the answer is "no"):
http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.cfm
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
~|
Discover CFTicke
Use of "this[]" syntax is fixed in BD 6.2, just released. Also, BlogCFC is
supported out-of-the-box on BD 6.2, so if you upgrade to BD 6.2, you can use
BlogCFC 3.6 unmodified (that's what I'm using for my blog--soon to be
posted--running on BD.NET).
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta
ch 23, 2005 8:33 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
>
> On the site
>
> http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/product_info/pricing.cfm
>
> I noticed it just now too...
>
> Yves
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:28:06 -050
; To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Released!
>
> Hi Vince,
>
> Congrats! Looks like you have a comma in the wrong place for
> the price of the 4-cpu .NET server product.
>
> v/r,
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:27:18 -0500, Vince Bo
CFFUNCTION security roles
- try/catch within CFSCRIPT
- CFTRACE
- performance enhancements, bug fixes, and more!
Regards,
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
~|
Logware (www.logw
FYI, the CFSEARCH implementation in BlueDragon is implemented using Lucene,
and includes the ability to spider web sites in addition to indexing files
on disk. This capability is in all versions of BlueDragon, including the
free Server edition.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http
P.S. Yes, you will tend to get better responses to BlueDragon questions on
the BlueDragon-Interest mailing list:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index
..cfm
Vince
> -Original Message-
> From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ueDragon at the same time, then things get a little trickier.
Charlie Arehart did a write-up on this that I can't seem to find off-hand
(maybe it was published in CFDJ?). If you send him an email directly
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), I'm sure he can point you to it.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta
this behavior:
This creates instead an array of 4 elements, with the third being
empty."
Maybe this is what Adam was thinking of?
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Haskell [mailto:
at break old code--that's just
something people using those languages learn to live with; for example, JDK
1.5 introduced the new "enum" keyword that broke people's old code. That's
just the way it is.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.
ragon/index.cfm
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 8:42 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: serialize cfc
>
> Wow, that's a prett
s:
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/products/bluedragon/download/home
Finally, you might try searching the BlueDragon bug tracking database to see
if there's any information about this problem there:
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/support/bluedragon/bugtracking/home
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communica
You can use Java HashMaps to create your own case-sensitive "struct". Try
this:
a = #myStruct.get( "a" )#
A = #myStruct.get( "A" )#
Here's the API reference for java.util.HashMap:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/HashM
/self_help/archive_search/index
..cfm
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Asim Manzur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:22 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: way to import the C-Sh
pabilities that ColdFusion does not.
Regards,
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 11:53 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: way to i
of BlueDragon).
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/docs/6_2/BlueDragon_
62_CFML_on_ASP_NET.pdf
Just because ColdFusion can't do it, doesn't mean it can't be done.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original M
e:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/docs/6_2/BlueDragon_
62_CFML_on_ASP_NET.pdf
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Asim Manzur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:
Wow. Just like BlueDragon. (Sorry, couldn't resist).
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:39 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Sub
Yes, sourceless deployment is supported in the BlueDragon standard edition
(BlueDragon Server JX). It's not supported in the BlueDragon free edition.
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Parry [ma
Try the Microsoft newsgroups:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/community/newsgroups/default.mspx
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, Fe
I'd agree with that. The Apache web server is probably in the same
category--used more in public hosting environments and less behind corporate
firewalls, so surveys that only measure public web servers (such as
Netcraft) tend to be skewed.
Vince
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Forta [m
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
