Keep in mind. There is 44 pages of variance where BD does not work in the same fashion
as the actual CFMX product that you will want to factor into your decision making.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Jones
Date: 11/4/04 2:17 am
To: CF-Talk
Subj: Re: Bluedragon Server
://www.newatlanta.com
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon Server
Keep in mind. There is 44 pages of variance where BD does not
work in the same fashion as the actual CFMX
I should have said: in BlueDragon 6.2, the list of incompatibilities is even
shorter, but the list of enhancements is longer.
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon Server
-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon Server
I should have said: in BlueDragon 6.2, the list of
incompatibilities is even shorter, but the list of
enhancements is longer.
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:46
: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon Server
Actually, that's not quite true. The BlueDragon 6.1 CFML
Compatibility Guide is indeed 44 pages (PDF). However, the
first 7 pages are title page, table of contents, intro, etc.
Then everything from page 15 to 44
Yes, according to their website, Railo is in Alpha 4, with an expected release of
version 1.0 during the first part of 2005.
Yes on enhancement DB has that Macromedia STILL does not support is
better implementation of xpaths and I applaud BD for this...i can't
beleive you can't do
So has anyone here actually used IgniteFusion on a site in production?
I realize it is a bit behind CFMX and Bluedragon, but perhaps it has enough to justify
using it, considering its no-strings-attached free license.
I mean, for common database interaction, email transaction, etc, certainly
I actually said variances not limitations.
If you are developing products that are intended to be deployed cross platform, then
you have consider all variances.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti
Date: 11/4/04 6:46 am
To: CF-Talk
Subj: RE: Bluedragon Server
While that may be true, it seems probable the the release of Blackstone will further
create a gap between actual CFMX and BD
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti
Date: 11/4/04 6:49 am
To: CF-Talk
Subj: RE: Bluedragon Server
I should have said: in BlueDragon 6.2
Calvin Ward wrote:
While that may be true, it seems probable the the release of Blackstone will further
create a gap between actual CFMX and BD
Of course, this is pure speculation. Speculating here myself, because
I'm not on the beta test, but I would not be surprised if MM shortened
BDs
Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 12:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon Server
I actually said variances not limitations.
If you are developing products that are intended to be
deployed cross platform, then you have consider
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon Server
While that may be true, it seems probable the the release of
Blackstone will further create a gap between actual CFMX and BD
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti
Date: 11/4/04 6:49 am
To: CF-Talk
Subj: RE: Bluedragon
to grow apart, they will become more distinct.
For better or worse, BD is not exactly CF.
-Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Moretti (cfmaster)
Date: 11/4/04 12:36 pm
To: CF-Talk
Subj: Re: Bluedragon Server
Calvin Ward wrote:
While that may be true, it seems probable
I don't think that's entirely accurate. For example, isn't one of those differences is
lack of support for some features in cfcollection/cfsearch?
-Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti
Date: 11/4/04 1:29 pm
To: CF-Talk
Subj: RE: Bluedragon Server
Yes, of course
I didn't know cfimage was in Blackstone, I don't any specific feature that I'm
refering to, however how about the flash related stuff?
-Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti
Date: 11/4/04 1:30 pm
To: CF-Talk
Subj: RE: Bluedragon Server
Perhaps. As I've stated before
]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. November 2004 22:18
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon Server
Well, my speculation is based on what has been made public on MM's site
and at MAX, the the stated focus of Blackstone appears
Intriguing. I was always under the impression that if you defined the
scope in the first place, the same kind of performance increase would
occur? Is that not what happens?
Thanks! Keep up the good work!
-Jordan
Gert Franz wrote:
hi there,
just take a look at the performance tests we did
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon Server
Intriguing. I was always under the impression that if you defined the
scope in the first place, the same kind of performance increase would
occur? Is that not what happens?
Thanks! Keep up the good work!
-Jordan
Gert Franz wrote:
hi there,
just take
--
scope
cascading=standart
cascade-to-resultset=yes
merge-url-form=no
- Gert -
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jordan Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 5. November 2004 01:20
An: CF-Talk
Betreff: Re: Bluedragon Server
BlueDragon has implemented cfcollection / cfsearch for a while (In their
initial 6.1 release?). The underlying engine is not Verity, though. It
uses one from the Apache project (I believe Lucene). It is not identical
to Verity, although from the point of CF code, it doesn't make much
Hello there,
You could check here for some comparison info...
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/product_info/cfml_tag_support.cfm
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/product_info/features.cfm#FCMatrix
I believe that the free version does have certain license restrictions...
On Wednesday 03 Nov 2004 13:30 pm, Ryan Jones wrote:
Will Bluedragon Server really offer me everything PHP does?
Yes.
And more.
Did you have something specific in mind ?
servers take up huge amounts of memory, and tend to crash often once the
traffic starts increasing. Are these stories
Well Tom, at this point I guess my primary concern is this:
Say along the way I decide to do something with our site that is not directly handled
by one of the currently available cfml tags...
With PHP I am basicly open and free to code and make the language do just about
anything I want it
Well Tom, at this point I guess my primary concern is this:
Say along the way I decide to do something with our site that is not directly handled
by one of the currently available cfml tags...
With PHP I am basicly open and free to code and make the language do just about
anything I want it
Actually, I have another concern: mass mailing.
We run a newsletter with over 3,000 subscribers. With PHP I sent out to this list on
a daily basis using phpmailer class sending via smtp. Works great.
I am afraid of using the cfmail tag for such mailings based on the fact that php's
mail()
On Wednesday 03 Nov 2004 13:49 pm, Ryan Jones wrote:
may be way off base here though... maybe the cfmail tag is capable of
handling thousands of addresses.
Certainly is, failing that there is the CFML that powers this very list :-)
Standard, meaning that I am also assuming it does NOT feature
Some of you might find this a little weird
But I once looped a cfmail to test BlueDragon' 3.x version and my
mail server I can't remember how many emails I was (and had) set
to receive, but I had no problem what so ever
And the loop was several 10s of thousand... probably about 50
have PHP code
that already handles your mailings, just continue to use it.
Rey...
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Bluedragon Server
Actually, I have another concern: mass
Ryan,
In my past life, working for an ISP that was a CF house, we had several
high subscriber e-newsletter clients. One technique that we employed,
which greatly reduced server load and errors, was to send out these
newsletters in batches of 500. Fairly easy to script, did not drag out
system
From: Ryan Jones wrote:
With PHP I am basicly open and free to code and make the
language do just about anything I want it to. With cfml, I
could find myself at a place where I need to call on java.
However, if I understand correctly, the free version of
Bluedragon does not support
I just read the system requirements for BD 6.2
It would be *REALLY* nice for us Linux users if you'd consider
supporting a more current operating system.
RedHat 9 reached its end-of-life in April of this year. Redhat
Enterprise Linux 2.1 is ancient.
Since Fedora is what replaced RedHat's
oops, sorry, wrong list =)
Rick Root wrote:
I just read the system requirements for BD 6.2
It would be *REALLY* nice for us Linux users if you'd consider
supporting a more current operating system.
RedHat 9 reached its end-of-life in April of this year. Redhat
Enterprise Linux 2.1 is
which versions of Linux they support.
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 9:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon 6.2/.NET Beta Released!
I just read the system requirements for BD 6.2
It would be *REALLY* nice
today, but I'm actually liking it quite a lot so far. Even the problems
I've had have been pretty simple to fix.
_
From: Alexander Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
At 11:09 AM 8/19/2004, you wrote
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
At 11:09 AM 8/19/2004, you wrote:
I didn't think it through very well before posting. I just got
frustrated and asked.
So, in the end, I'm not sure if
I'm going to be switching over to BD at all
Maybe I am reading the following line wrong, but it looks like you are
trying to evaluate the filename as a variable.
cfif fileexists(evaluate(variables.incfilename))
Shouldn't the above be as follows?
cfif fileexists(variables.incfilename)
-Matt
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
You have this block:
cfif fileexists(evaluate(variables.incfilename))
cfinclude template=#variables.incfilename#
cfelse
...
I think the issue is that you're testing to see if
Evaluate(variables.incfilename) exists, but then you're only
including variables.incfilename.Try cfinclude
, 2004 9:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
Maybe I am reading the following line wrong, but it looks like you are
trying to evaluate the filename as a variable.
cfif fileexists(evaluate(variables.incfilename))
Shouldn't the above be as follows?
cfif fileexists
the same thing.
_
From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
You have this block:
cfif fileexists(evaluate(variables.incfilename))
cfinclude template=#variables.incfilename#
cfelse
...
I think
You are not modifying it for path so fileexists( ) should crap out - unless BD does relative paths... does it? Also -
what's with the evaluate( ) function? Seems superflous to me.
-mk
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:31 AM
FileExists(foo)
cfabort
/cfif
cfinclude template=#foo#
When called index.cfm will be included.
-Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ken Ferguson
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude
like a
total moron.
--Ferg
_
From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
You are not modifying it for path so fileexists( ) should crap out -
unless BD does relative paths... does it? Also
, that the error message is less than
specific.;^)
Jim Davis
_
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
Nope, same result.
Also, cfoutput#variables.incfilename#/cfoutput gives the same value
:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
In testing locally I found that FileExists() seems to be the problem.
Basically, nothing inside the cfif executes. Simply including a template
based on a variable without checking to see if it exists works.
In fact, the following template
At 11:09 AM 8/19/2004, you wrote:
I didn't think it through very well before posting. I just got
frustrated and asked.
So, in the end, I'm not sure if
I'm going to be switching over to BD at all.
Why switch to begin with? Do you need functionality in BD that is not in CFMX, or is it the price
full path not fule
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
Matt,
Yes but... fileexists requires the fule path (i.e. e:\wwwroot\index.cfm - not just index.cfm) so
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon cfinclude issues
Matt,
Yes but... fileexists requires the fule path (i.e. e:\wwwroot\index.cfm -
not just index.cfm) so I would definitley
expect the cfif to return FALSE - or am I missing something?
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta
It's just that I've had so many issues with BD and functions. I seem to
have been forced to rework every single one of them in the move from
CFMX. They're all flying well on my prod server which runs MX, but they
fail on BD for any number of reasons. So, in the end, I'm not sure if
I'm going
Big warning though if you use XMLsearch In BD don't expect to get the
same results in MX if you are using functions... count(//*) works
great in BD not so much in MX...that being said if anyone has a work
around for it other than using Stuct functions on the XML object let
me know. I am working on
BlueDragon hooks into IIS by mapping the .cfm extension to the Microsoft
.NET Framework:
- right-click on a web site and open the properties dialog (or open the
Master Properties dialog)
- go to the Home Directory tab
- click the Configuration button
- on the Mappings tab you'll see the
yeah, well now the server is completely hosed, reinstall of cfmx
doesnt even work, and this sucks.you need to make that more clear to
people, really.
i shoulda known.you get what you pay for.
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:42:11 -0400, Vince Bonfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BlueDragon hooks into IIS
Tony Weeg wrote:
yeah, well now the server is completely hosed, reinstall of cfmx
doesnt even work, and this sucks.you need to make that more clear to
people, really.
Well, it *IS* a technology preview release, which means it's not even in
the BETA stage yet.I hope you didn't install it on a
Yes, you're right. We'll add a warning in the next version of the installers
before overwriting any existing .cfm mappings.
My apologies.
Vince
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re
nope, my dev box, but its still frustrating :( arggh
me
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:43:28 -0400, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Weeg wrote:
yeah, well now the server is completely hosed, reinstall of cfmx
doesnt even work, and this sucks.you need to make that more clear to
Oops.Forgot to mention we use CF5 Enterprise (for the Oracle Native drivers).
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Lofback, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 9:52 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: BlueDragon in production?
I am looking at BlueDragon and would like to know who
Oops.Forgot to mention we use CF5 Enterprise (for the
Oracle Native drivers).
One thing you might run into, whether you migrate from CF 5 to BlueDragon or
to MX, is that you'll be using JDBC drivers to connect to Oracle, and there
are often little differences between how they work and how your
:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon in production?
Oops.Forgot to mention we use CF5 Enterprise (for the
Oracle Native drivers).
One thing you might run into, whether you migrate from CF 5 to BlueDragon or
to MX, is that you'll be using JDBC drivers to connect to Oracle
We are using CFMX Enterprise for some internal apps and the
Oracle drivers work without a hitch.
Good. You'll want to perform the same sort of testing with BlueDragon, as
I'm guessing it uses a different set of JDBC drivers. In the event that you
have any problems with those drivers, or the
Chris,
You should post this question on the BlueDragon-Interest mailing list,
you'll find many more BlueDragon users there than on this list:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index
.cfm
Of course, New Atlanta's web site is running on BlueDragon. So, yes, we
Hi Lola,
Yes, Unicode is supported in the BlueDragon 6.1 release, currently nearing
the end of beta testing (the final release should happen before the end of
April). Unicode is not supported in earlier releases of BlueDragon.
I'll ask the marketing folk to make this more clear on the web site.
how far does bd 6.1 go in its i18n support? do you use cf style locales or
java's? fully support cultural formatting, etc.?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
: http:/www.coldgen.com/
_
From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2004 3:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I just downloaded it too and it looks awesome, but am having problems
connecting to MSDE instances. I'm not sure where
Well it can't be any worse then EM. Might try it myself.
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep.Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk
to a
wide variety of dbs.Of course, since it's not MS-specific, it doesn't
have all
the bells and whistles
On Friday 12 Mar 2004 07:35 am, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
Macromedia just recently released an updater to JRun 4 ('tis Updater 3)
which fixes numerous issues with JDBC drivers.
If anyone on the list has info on what environment the updater is best
applied on please let us know (eg: CFMX 6.1
At 12:32 PM -0800 3/10/04, Rob wrote:
I just downloaded it... awsome product :) better the pgaccess in my
opnion (for those of you on old postgres)
I would have to agree that this is a great product.And the developer is very responsive; there's a mailing list on Yahoogroups named aquadatastudio.
How do you set up your database tables using the bindings
tab when you have to sign on using RDS and BlueDragon does
not support it.Does this not disable a big feature of
dreamweaver mx when using BlueDragon or am I missing
something simple?
Yes, it disable that feature
Yes, it disable that feature
Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
Dreamweaver?
davidBerry
BerryNet Design
Cell: 517-204-5454
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
Dreamweaver?
Not having the Binding Panel enabled doesn't prevent you from making any
database work :-)
After all, you just edit text file, you could easily get rid of DW at all
and still be happy (many do)
I use DWMX for all my coding but I don't think I've ever used it's features
for 'database' work, preferring to do it by hand...
-Original Message-
From: David Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 15:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
Yes, it disable
do it by hand. for sure.much faster/better/easier than any other ide could
give you
-Original Message-
From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I use DWMX for all my coding but I don't
Plus you're in control of what's being written!!!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 15:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
do it by hand. for sure.much faster/better/easier than any other ide could
give you
Yes, it disable that feature
Then how do you do any database work using BlueDragon and
Dreamweaver?
We have DW and CFMX, but our server guys have disabled RDS for security
reasons. So it's not just BlueDragon users in this boat.
We write our own code.
-Kevin
[Todays Threads]
[This
Plus you're in control of what's being written!!!
You can use any code generator and still retain full control of what's being
written. It just require an extra investment since you need to know the way
the code generator works and tweak it to fit your needs (DW is very
extensible).
BTW CF MX
very interesting.. Altought I do code by hand I also
sometimes find the feature in the binding panels very handy
to use.I have also posted this on the blueDragon list so
see what there response is.
We have DW and CFMX, but our server guys have
disabled RDS for security
reasons. So it's not
I can't remember the last time I used RDS.There's a terrific tool called Aqua Data Studio (www.aquafold.com)
that I use instead.It provides support for every major database as well as ODBC, and has a terrific query
generator, data editor, and other DB-related tools.It's a very nice way to
Actually, the cool part of using DWMX (and CFS) here is that you can see the table/column names within the IDE. Not the generation of code!
Calvin
- Original Message -
From: Tony Weeg
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
do
Most databases have associated GUI tools that have way more power than
DWMX ever will. For example, I have never used a more powerful GUI for
use with SQL Server than Enterprise Manager. Most people are amazed
when I show them some of the things it can do that they were relying on
DWMX or
Yep, I use the same. It rocks.
Stace
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
I can't remember the last time I used RDS.There's a terrific tool
called Aqua Data Studio
Yep.Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk to a
wide variety of dbs.Of course, since it's not MS-specific, it doesn't have all
the bells and whistles of EM, but it's the best thing out there if you have to
deal with more than one brand of db.
- Jeff
On 10 Mar 2004
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep.Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk to a
wide variety of dbs.Of course, since it's not MS-specific, it doesn't have all
the bells and whistles of EM, but it's the best thing out there if you have to
in this software.
-Frank
- Original Message -
From: Rob
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep.Aqua Data is like Enterprise Manager, but with the ability to talk to a
wide variety
I just downloaded it too and it looks awesome, but am having
problems connecting to MSDE instances. I'm not sure where to
specify the instance name. I am guessing that MS does this by
using different ports for each instance. I have it setup to
use Windows Auth. I don't see that option in
I just downloaded it too and it looks awesome, but am
having problems connecting to MSDE instances. I'm not
sure where to specify the instance name. I am guessing
that MS does this by using different ports for each
instance. I have it setup to use Windows Auth. I don't
see that
nicely out of the box on postgres
7.2 - though there was no box)
... you know there were a lot of abbreviations in that; let me know if I
can help.
-Frank
- Original Message -
From: Rob
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
Rob MSDE is Microsoft SQL Desktop Engine.
Aqua Data is the way to go.I have learned allot from you all today.
Thanks! ~dB
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon and Dreamweaver MX
On Wed, 2004
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 6:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon 6.1B2 issues
For the first one, if you remove the closing /cfhttp tag it will remove
the error (the closing /cfhttp tag is unnecessary; if you remove it your
code is still compatible with CF5/MX). This issue
Hi Peter,
For the first one, if you remove the closing /cfhttp tag it will remove
the error (the closing /cfhttp tag is unnecessary; if you remove it your
code is still compatible with CF5/MX). This issue is documented in the
BlueDragon CFML Compatibility Guide:
BlueDragon does not support
Hi Rick,
You might want to post this question to the BlueDragon-Interest mailing
list, since that's where most BlueDragon users gather:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/archive_search/index
.cfm
Also, be sure to ask about BlueDragon's advantages compared to CF5/CFMX as
For the first one, if you remove the closing /cfhttp tag it will remove
the error (the closing /cfhttp tag is unnecessary; if you remove it your
code is still compatible with CF5/MX). This issue is documented in the
BlueDragon CFML Compatibility Guide:
BlueDragon does not support closing tags for
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:56 pm, Matt Liotta wrote:
We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
choice and BlueDragon's strong showing as of 6.1 just made that choice
a lot harder than it used to be by implemented much of CFMX.
:nods
That's one of the things that has
Matt wrote:
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
Any chance of elaboration on that point?Main advantages/disadvantages?
-dc
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt wrote:
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
Any chance of elaboration on that point?Main advantages/disadvantages?
The cost advantage is even larger if you want
Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main
advantages/disadvantages?
That is an interesting question and partially why I brought it up. I'm
not sure that I know all the advantages and disadvantages. I could
certainly start listing things off the top of my head, but I don't know
that
I was hoping to present a Flex or Central presentation at the next meeting
on December 10. Of course I was one of the many not accepted to the beta and
the NDA would no doubt be problematic.
Instead I have chosed to present BlueDragon 6.1 (beta). We need to keep CFML
alive and BlueDragon will go
FYI, you might be interested to know that the following web site is running
on BlueDragon Server JX (all of the .htm pages are really dynamic CFML
pages being served by BlueDragon--there are no static pages on the site):
http://www.linuxworld.com
That server has the following configuration:
P.S. For those of you who might be skeptical:
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.linuxworld.com
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al.
FYI, you
The free version of BD server is free to use. In development orproduction/deployment.I have a copy of it (3.0.2) running on a Linux Mandrake server for acommunity project that we're building.So far I'm still in development. haven't really had much traffic. I'musing MySQL, seems to work very
I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project andconsidering usingBlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am notmisreadinganything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers,costs nothing interms of a license. Can anyone (maybe from New Atlanta)confirm this isaccurate?Correct.The
-Talk Subject: RE: Bluedragon Licensing et al. The free version of BD server is free to use. In development or production/deployment. I have a copy of it (3.0.2) running on a Linux Mandrake serverfor a community project that we're building. So far I'm still in development. haven't really had
I am drafting the specs for a volunteer project and considering usingBlueDragon Server on RedHat. I want to make sure I am not misreadinganything: BlueDragon server, with the PostGres drivers, costs nothing interms of a license. Can anyone (maybe from New Atlanta) confirm this isaccurate?Trying
201 - 300 of 483 matches
Mail list logo
