On Friday 30 Mar 2007, Rick Root wrote:
> I'm currently working on a flex application where the user can set a
> variety of preferences. For example, a list of items to be automatically
> selected in a certain list control.
OOI, why not use SharedObject() ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to enormousl
I still use WDDX in old and new applications. Not often, but I find it
valuable for storing data in the database that I don't need to be
searchable.
I'm currently working on a flex application where the user can set a variety
of preferences. For example, a list of items to be automatically selec
Thanks Jim, this is very helpful.
Dan
On 3/23/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:54 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality
> >
> > While having a few
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:54 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality
>
> While having a few legacy apps myself making use of WDDX, I was
> wondering if
> WDDX still has value that is not currentl
In my opinion value of WDDX today is ability to quickly convert complex data
types to predefined XML format. There are times when you just need query as
XML without paying too much attention how it's actually structured.
Tero
-Original Message-
From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
> Good Morning All! Having issues parsing a WDDX recordset
> pulled from an Oracle database. The recordset was created
> within JavaScript using the WDDX.js, and then passed to a CF
> page that inserts it into an Oracle Database. We ran into a
> size issue inserting the record, even though it
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:50 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
>
> > I'm making the assumption (probably a good one) that the problem
>
> I'm making the assumption (probably a good one) that the problem
> is on my end...
Jim: It's not a problem... just confusion brought on by a lack of
explanation. That outer array is the array of s... you can
safely ignore it.
To make things clearer, I added a second CFDUMP that displays the
de
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
> > If you have some time I'd much appreciate you going over my XMLRPC
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
>
> > But
> > although the system does seem to be well supported it also see
> But
> although the system does seem to be well supported it also seems to be
> poorly documented. ;^)
Jim: That's a matter of perspective. Some people love Dave Winer's
approach to spec-writing, and some people absolutely *loathe* it. I'm
gonna guess you're in the latter group. :D
> -
> Mostly because I'd never heard of it until you mentioned it. Where have you
> been for the past two weeks while I've been ranting about not having
> something like this. ;^)
Jim: I only skim the list, in general. I'm surprised I didn't notice
the conversation, though... I have watchlists set u
"ditto" and very original.
>>I think I've hit upon an appropriate name... get ready... here
>
>Jim, that's a *brilliant* name for such a technology. Seriously.
>
>/t
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based ti
A slightly new version:
http://www.depressedpress.com/DepressedPress/Test/
This one fixed several string parsing errors - one of which I feel is
interesting enough to talk about:
Apparently IE 6 has a problem with "\v" (the escape character for "Vertical
Tab".
I'm creating a hash table of chara
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:04 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
>
> Jim: Any reason not to go with the prior art and just use (or extend,
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:04 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
>
> Jim: Any reason not to go with the prior art and just use (or extend,
> if nec
Jim: Any reason not to go with the prior art and just use (or extend,
if necessary) XML-RPC?
XML-RPC parsers are everywhere, so it's pretty much the no-brainer
default option for passing around programmatic data. In fact, that was
one of the big points made when Jeremy Allaire and I were discussin
>I think I've hit upon an appropriate name... get ready... here
>it comes...
>
>YODEL
>
>It stand for "Yet another Open Data Exchange Language". Also
>Yodeling began
>as a method for passing messaged from mountain peak to
>mountain peak using
>only simple modulations of voice... all told it see
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:20 PM
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
>>
>> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>> >>>My personal favori
> General Open Architecture Transport Specific Engine
Yeah, I don't think Jim's really going for the "lose your lunch"
effect. :)
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.fusiontap.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:20 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
>
> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> >>>My personal favorite...
> >>>XXL - XML
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:22 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
>
> If you want to be really cool:
> XDX - XML Data X-change or for the English majors, XDE -
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:27 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
>
> I like Adamic... but not because it invloves my name.
>
> http://en.wikiped
Ruthless. You sir have hit a new low. LOL.
Rey...
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> General Open Architecture Transport Specific Engine
>
>
> On 8/18/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>>>
>>My personal favorite...
>>XXL - XML Xchange Language
>>
>>>why n
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Davis wrote:
> DPXL: ("Depressed Press Transfer Language") - the professional side of
> me is leaning here. It puts my company right in the name! But how
> smart is it to put a trade
Calvin Ward wrote:
> Then I vote for
>
> PDXF (Purple Dinosaur eXchange Format)...
i was actually thinking about the flintstones.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http:/
Then I vote for
PDXF (Purple Dinosaur eXchange Format)...
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
Because "barney" is already taken. ;)
On 8/1
Because "barney" is already taken. ;)
On 8/18/05, Paul Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> >>>My personal favorite...
> >>>XXL - XML Xchange Language
>
> why not just "fred" or "barney"?
>
--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/
Go
General Open Architecture Transport Specific Engine
On 8/18/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> My personal favorite...
> XXL - XML Xchange Language
>
> > why not just "fred" or "barney"?
>
> I like "Bob" for anything that can't be named... or pos
> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
My personal favorite...
XXL - XML Xchange Language
> why not just "fred" or "barney"?
I like "Bob" for anything that can't be named... or possibly Edgar.
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
At 05:00 PM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
>Courier ... or possibly X-Courier...
>
>DataWinch
>
>DataSieve
>
>Windlass
>
>Puny X-Press
>
>PieHole :)
LOL!
DataBitch
PacketWagon
XMule
XHNA (XHNA Has No Acronym)
--
Phillip Beazley
Onvix -- Website Hosting, Development & E-commerce
Visit http://www.onv
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>>>My personal favorite...
>>>XXL - XML Xchange Language
why not just "fred" or "barney"?
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenti
> I'm really leaning towards a non-abbreviated word...
> something that means
> "move" or "transfer" but maybe even with a sense of irony
> or humor.
> "Wormhole" perhaps?"DataSphincter"?
Courier ... or possibly X-Courier...
DataWinch
DataSieve
Windlass
Puny X-Press
PieHole :)
s. isaa
> At 04:21 PM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
>>My personal favorite...
>>XXL - XML Xchange Language
> Or for really big packets, XXXL - XML Xfer and Xchange
> Language.
And pohibited in many states of course... :)
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features witho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Davis wrote:
> DPXL: ("Depressed Press Transfer Language") - the professional side of me is
> leaning here. It puts my company right in the name! But how smart is it to
> put a trademark in the name of something you're open-sourcing?
Well, seei
I like Adamic... but not because it invloves my name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamic_language
Although, I'm not crazy about the religous background.
-Adam
On 8/18/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are the names we've come up with so far (with my personal comments):
>
> DPXL:
At 04:21 PM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
>My personal favorite...
>XXL - XML Xchange Language
Or for really big packets, XXXL - XML Xfer and Xchange Language.
--
Phillip Beazley
Onvix -- Website Hosting, Development & E-commerce
Visit http://www.onvix.com/ or call 727-578-9600.
2:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
Here are the names we've come up with so far (with my personal comments):
DPXL: ("Depressed Press Transfer Language") - the professional side of me is
leaning here. It puts my company right in the name! But how sma
MILF
Multiple Information Language Format
yeah, means nothing and has little to nothing to do with your WDDX
replacement...but would get recognition because of the acronym, I
reckon :)
DataSphincter's gonna be hard to beat tho.
On 8/18/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are the nam
Here are the names we've come up with so far (with my personal comments):
DPXL: ("Depressed Press Transfer Language") - the professional side of me is
leaning here. It puts my company right in the name! But how smart is it to
put a trademark in the name of something you're open-sourcing?
DEML:
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 12:37 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Dav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Davis wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Not quite true. The data typing in JSON is implicit. Of the types listed
>>below it can unambiguously represent object, array, null, string,
>>string, b
> -Original Message-
> From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:32 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
>
> Interesting ideas and it seems like a good direction.
>
> The use
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:57 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Why not dpx
XIEF (XML Information Exchange Format)
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
> Well - it looks like "dataML" is already taken
> Well - it looks like "dataML" is already taken for
> something else anyway...
> anybody got a good idea for a new name?
> I'm thinking either simple as in "dpml" (Depressed Press
> Markup Language)
> which says absolutely NOTHING about what it does or
> esoteric like "Rosetta".
> Whatcha think?
At 02:33 AM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
>Well - it looks like "dataML" is already taken for something else anyway...
>anybody got a good idea for a new name?
>
>I'm thinking either simple as in "dpml" (Depressed Press Markup Language)
>which says absolutely NOTHING about what it does or esoteric like "R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why not dpxl, seeing as it's not a markup language so much as a data
transfer language that happens to an XML application?
Jim Davis wrote:
+) Something that's easy to parse for JavaScript. SOAP is NOT easy to
> parse (which is, I think, why there's
Interesting ideas and it seems like a good direction.
The use of the word object seems to trip me up (since I always think of
objects as having both values ( properties ) and funcionality ( methods
)...)
Going to be tough on a name, most of the 4/5 letter ...ml options have been
used at this poin
Well - it looks like "dataML" is already taken for something else anyway...
anybody got a good idea for a new name?
I'm thinking either simple as in "dpml" (Depressed Press Markup Language)
which says absolutely NOTHING about what it does or esoteric like "Rosetta".
Whatcha think?
I know this is
The docs have some info:
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/xml51.htm
On 6/21/05, Kevin Rosenthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
> Can anyone send me to a simple tutorial on how to use the coldfusion to wddx
> functions? I had used it once before about a year ago to c
> -Original Message-
> From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2005 7:30
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: WDDX Status?
>
> Why are questions about wddx off topic?
Well - I think questions about using WDDX in CF would be on topic... but I
At least CF-OT instead of CF-Community - I can't see how WDDX belongs with
muffins etc.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2005 7:30
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX Status?
Why are questions about wddx off topic?
It seem like
Why are questions about wddx off topic?
It seem like a lot of stuff is going to cf-community that seems appropriate
here.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Status?
Sorry folks - I
>SOAP is a transport protocol which is only useful in the context of web
>services. Why not just write your own schema? It's not that difficult to do
>this. I don't see much reason to bother with WDDX if you have a more
>domain-specific way to talk about your data.
Right now it's purely business-B
> Does anybody know if the WDDX implementation in CF 7 is
> actually updated from previous versions? Is there any work
> on the project?
I would be surprised if there have been any recent changes to it, or if
there ever will be. What's to change, after all? You can still use WDDX to
describe ge
Sorry folks - I meant that for CF_Community. It's really off-topic for this
list.
That being said I'd still like to hear what you have to say - but please post
to the CF-community thread if possible.
Jim Davis
~|
Discover CF
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:23:50 -0500, Robert Bailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Are you using WDDX?
>
Yes
> 2) If so, how are you using it, which languages (and versions) are you
> using
> it with (CF, JS, PHP, et al.)?
>
CF, JavaScript, Python (extensively)
> 3) Are you limited by the cur
>1) Are you using WDDX?
No, I know how it works, but haven't needed it for anything yet.
>
>2) If so, how are you using it, which languages (and versions) are you using
>it with (CF, JS, PHP, et al.)?
>
>3) Are you limited by the current version of the WDDX SDK?
>
>4) If so, what features would
1) Are you using WDDX?
I work with it, other developers here use it all the time, I stick to
straight XML for the most part
2) If so, how are you using it, which languages (and versions) are you
using
it with (CF, JS, PHP, et al.)?
CF, JS
3) Are you limited by the current version of the WDDX
1) Are you using WDDX?
Yes
2) If so, how are you using it, which languages (and versions) are you using
it with (CF, JS, PHP, et al.)?
Java
3) Are you limited by the current version of the WDDX SDK?
No
4) If so, what features would you like to see included?
5) Should the WDDX community ef
1) Are you using WDDX?
Yes
2) If so, how are you using it, which languages (and versions) are you using
it with (CF, JS, PHP, et al.)?
Storing complex variable types (structs stored in queries) from CF6.1
directly to the DB
3) Are you limited by the current version of the WDDX SDK?
No
4) If
In Java, for example, objects aren't serialized as an object, just
their class name and instance data is serialized. Then on the
receiving end, a class of the same type is instnatiated, and the
serialized instance data is injected into the new instnace. This has
a couple consequences: 1) you don'
Wonder how bloated object serialization would be...
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Future
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:27:58 -0500, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ju
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:27:58 -0500, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wanted to take a survey on WDDX.
>
> 1) Are you using WDDX?
Yep
> 2) If so, how are you using it, which languages (and versions) are you using
> it with (CF, JS, PHP, et al.)?
CF and JS
> 3) Are you limited by the
> 1) Are you using WDDX?
Yep.
> 2) If so, how are you using it, which languages (and versions) are you using
> it with (CF, JS, PHP, et al.)?
I use it to serialize CFML data structures and dump them to the
filesystem for caching and/or storage.
> 3) Are you limited by the current version of the
That was it.
Thanks to all that responded.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Kwang Suh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:24:36 -0400
Subject: Re: WDDX error
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do this:
>This is the problem:
>In form1.cfm
>
entered by the users and I
>have no control over it. It happnes only very rarely but still when it
>happens the user cannot continue and they get frustrated
>
>Thanks
>Richard
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Adrian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Da
> This is the problem:
> In form1.cfm
>
>
> seelct * form ...
>
>
>
> output = "wddxQuery1">
>
>
>
> On the submit form:
>
> output = "wddxQuery1"> bombs if the original query some
> fileds with special characters in them. In my case &
>
> The query is based on some previous data, en
but still when it
happens the user cannot continue and they get frustrated
Thanks
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:37:21 +0100
Subject: RE: WDDX error
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Expanding on that, how about loo
Expanding on that, how about looping through the FORM scope before
serializing it.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 August 2004 18:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX error
Ok if you XMlformat the entide WDDX string itd going to escape all
Expanding on that, how about looping through the FORM scope before
serializing it.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 August 2004 18:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX error
Ok if you XMlformat the entide WDDX string itd going to escape all
Ok if you XMlformat the entide WDDX string itd going to escape all the
<> in the WDDX . You could try something like this:
wddxstuff = xmlformat(wddxstuff);
wddxstuff =replace(wddxstuff ,'<','<','all');
wddxstuff =replace(wddxstuff ,'>','>','all');
wddxstuff =replace(wddxstuff ,'&&','&','all');
P
Rich Ziade wrote:
> I have a wddx that I'm trying to turn back into a CFML structure. The wddx
> looks fine. It CFDUMP's nicely as well. But whenever I try to turn it back
> to CFML, I get:
>
>
> WDDX packet parse error at line 1, column 1. The markup in the document
> preceding the root element m
At 10:16 AM 6/8/2004, you wrote:
>I have a wddx that I'm trying to turn back into a CFML structure. The wddx
>looks fine. It CFDUMP's nicely as well. But whenever I try to turn it back
>to CFML, I get:
>
>
>WDDX packet parse error at line 1, column 1. The markup in the document
>preceding the root
Original Message:
> From: "Barney Boisvert"
> WDDX changed between CF5 and CFMX. Bottom line, CF5 WDDX and CFMX WDDX are
> incompatible. They might be really similar, but they're different enough to
> pretty much break everything. I think you're going to have to change your
> code throughout,
WDDX changed between CF5 and CFMX. Bottom line, CF5 WDDX and CFMX WDDX are
incompatible. They might be really similar, but they're different enough to
pretty much break everything. I think you're going to have to change your
code throughout, or perhaps write a custom serialization routine that m
What error do you get?
I did a lot of WDDX exchanges in 5.0 between remote hosts -- once I got
the programs debugged there was no problem with WDDX.
Can you make it fail?
Could a timeout be the cause?
Could you catch a unaccepted WDDX packet and save it to a text file
where you could do a dif
> I'm running CF 5.0 and using WDDX to get data back from
> another site. What's weird is sometimes the WDDX code is
> accepted on my server, sometimes it isn't and throws an
> error. Exact same code is returned in both cases. Has
> anybody seen this happen before?
Could you be a bit more s
>http://www.openwddx.org/
>
>?
>
>
>
>
> _
>
>From: John mccosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 23 February 2004 12:15
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: wddx for java
>
>
>Hi,
>
>does anyone know where I can get the com.allaire.wddx package / api for
>serializing java objects to xml.
>
>I'm w
http://www.openwddx.org/
?
_
From: John mccosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 February 2004 12:15
To: CF-Talk
Subject: wddx for java
Hi,
does anyone know where I can get the com.allaire.wddx package / api for
serializing java objects to xml.
I'm wondering is this a deprec
Can you show us the packet? I seem to remember an issue with WDDX packets
when I was working on getting Spectra running on MX.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Not sure of the cost but Moreover has some news feeds in WDDX format:
http://w.moreover.com/categories/category_list_wddx.html
-Novak
-Original Message-
From: Nathan C. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: WDDX inexpensive news
gt; Thanks for the response. Any other comments?
>
>
> Shawn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:09 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: WDDX vs raw XML?
>
> I don't think 4 or 5 should pose a
a limit of two deep.
Thanks for the response. Any other comments?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX vs raw XML?
I don't think 4 or 5 should pose as a problem. I know I have a WDDX
I don't think 4 or 5 should pose as a problem. I know I have a WDDX
solutions that has around 5 or 6 and it works fine. Also you may check out
wddx site and see whatever there is a limit or no limit at all. It would be
strange in my opinion if the limit (if any) was set to something under 10.
TK
Subject: RE: SOLVED Re: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape
If you can't use session vars, or client vars, consider using a database and
simply get/set on each request. It isn't the best solution, but its
workable. Use a cookie to just record the PK for the user, but be sure to
not
I'm not sure if Netscape has a smaller cookie size tan IE, but why not
simply store the value in the session scope?
Also, I have a multi-step process custom tag available on my home page that
you may like:
http://www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=395FB53
7-009C-A8DB-7
If you can't use session vars, or client vars, consider using a database and
simply get/set on each request. It isn't the best solution, but its
workable. Use a cookie to just record the PK for the user, but be sure to
not use sequential PKs.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
ginal Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape
I'm not sure if Netscape has a smaller cookie size tan IE, but why not
simply store the value in the session scope?
Also, I ha
ia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder & Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Camden
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: WDDX, cookies, and
-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
Hmm, something else to consider. You can pass the name of a UDF to a UDF
and then call it dynamically...
function alpha() { return "a"; }
function beta() {
s the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: D. Delcomminette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:38 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
>
>
> Your suggestion is good as soon as the se
Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
Why store the udf as a preference? I'd just store a string, ie,
pageA.display="thumbnail" or pageA.display="Summary
pheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: DDE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:17 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
>
>
> It is much more complex than that
eo and UDF2_param by ClipName, and save it to my
preferences.
DO you have a better idea of what I mean ??
Thanks
Dominique
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
So wait a minute
oo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: D. Delcomminette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:32 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
>
>
> Yeah, almost.
y a
whole bunch of parameters amongst which a couple of functions.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
Are you saying that based on user input, you would need to call a
function
rful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: D. Delcomminette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:34 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
>
>
> Ops . I wish my English was better .
>
>
your patience.
Dominique
-Original Message-
From: webguy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF
Ok understand that. But what I don't understand is why you need to store the
preferences as a function.
Can't you just s
1 - 100 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
