Best study materials to use [7:16946]

2001-08-22 Thread Brown G.G.
For the CCNP/DP. I have been hearing that the Cisco Press is the best source. Please any input would be greatly appreciated. Also I would like to know a few folks opinion on the CCDP/CCNP which one seems to be more valuable? Thanks, GG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php

RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

2001-08-22 Thread Spencer Penfield
Just a note: Summary: Installation: Lowest Administrative distance (all other routes are discarded until new 'election' during the updates when the route is failed) Forwarding: Longest Match + Destination IP WITHIN the RANGE After reading the article below, I want to point out that

RE: Problem with Cisco 2505? [7:16758]

2001-08-22 Thread Munzir Khan
Follow this link http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/cis2500/2505/2500him/77413.htm#xtocid173618 Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16944&t=16758 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscrip

RE: ISDN speed improving by new Cisco software [7:16825]

2001-08-22 Thread Munzir Khan
You can use Cisco Secure 2.6 software for multisession, and above cisco link talks about configuration on router side. If you have CCO access you can download a demo copy of Cisco Secure to have this feature. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16943&t=16825 ---

Re: Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping to IPs [7:16847]

2001-08-22 Thread Munzir Khan
use "debug ip icmp" and see the log Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16942&t=16847 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

Re: Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping to IPs [7:16847]

2001-08-22 Thread Kiran Kumar M
Thank you Patrick, for your mail. I am not using any firewall or acl s on end router. And My Mainrouter is Cisco otherside router is Intel 9515. On Intel side we are unable to ping. Thanks, Kiran On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > Sounds like firewall issues... > > high icmp port

Re: router boots into rommon mode... [7:16890]

2001-08-22 Thread Sean Knox
I did change the config-register to 0x2102 (that's what was shown in "sh version"). Yet the router still boots to rommon. I will try issuing the confreg 0x2102 command in rommon, but I don't see how that will help. Would the fact that this router is actually a route switch module using a flash ca

cannot get 2611 router to answer [7:16939]

2001-08-22 Thread Mr. Richard L. Pickard
8/23/2001 12:02am Thursday I am trying to hyperterm in to a 2611 router via a USR 14,400 sportster modem. The router answers BUT the hyperterm screen is black with a flashing curser only. No input can be sent from the keyboard. output of show line & show run are as follows: frame_relay_switch

RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

2001-08-22 Thread Erick B.
This is true with 'ip classless' configured but 'no ip classless' (aka classfull forwarding) the forwarding has a slightly different behavior and depending on the IP addressing static/default routes may not work as thought. --- "Baker, Jason" wrote: > there is one simple answer. > > the router

Where can I find more info about S.100? [7:16937]

2001-08-22 Thread George Zhang
Anybody know where I can find some infomation about S.100? Thanks. George Zhang Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16937&t=16937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.htm

remote source route bridging [7:16936]

2001-08-22 Thread EL PINGU
can anyone out there tell me what is wrong with my config. scenario when i do a show source i get the following. the remote is closed r4# sh so Local Interfaces: receive transmit srn bn trn r p s n max hops cnt cnt drops To0

VPN through a private IP network [7:16935]

2001-08-22 Thread johnny b
Hi all, Been asked to set up a vpn for a client in both Sydney and Europe. Problem that I am running into is that I have heard that VPN's will not work when any type of NAT is used. The client wants both server's using 192.168.1.0 type of IP address'sCan this be done on various platforms, n

RE: CCNP-Remote Access Exam Info Needed [7:16932]

2001-08-22 Thread Kanthimathi R
Thanks Juli > R.Kanthimathi > Software Engineer > Infosys - COMMUNICATION & PRODUCT SERVICES > > Powered by intellect. Driven by values. > -Original Message- From: Juli Hato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, Augu

2502 Token Ring interface what type of MAU & Cable? [7:16933]

2001-08-22 Thread Scott Lokey
Hi, I just got 2 Cisco 2502's with the 9-pin Token Ring interface. I also have a MAU but it's RJ45. Anyone know where I can find a cable to make this connection? Thanks, Scott ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com

CCNP-Remote Access Exam Info Needed [7:16932]

2001-08-22 Thread Kanthimathi R
hi, Can any one tell me the passing score, number of questions & time for CCNP-Remote Access Exam? TIA, > R.Kanthimathi > Software Engineer > Infosys - COMMUNICATION & PRODUCT SERVICES > > Powered by intellect. Driven by values. Messa

Re: NLSP SAP Filtering [7:16418]

2001-08-22 Thread Karen E Young
Dave, You can do some filtering. There are specific access lists that you can use for SAP filtering (access-list 1000-1099) and for filtering NLSP route aggregation (access-list 1200-1299). http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios112/112cg_cr/6rbook/6ripx.htm HTH, Ka

6509 with MSFC used as a terminal server [7:16930]

2001-08-22 Thread edeltacomccie
Have anyone seen a 6509 with a MSFC being used as a terminal server. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16930&t=16930 --

Re: NAT using a single interface [7:16902]

2001-08-22 Thread Stephane LITKOWSKI
What do u want to do exactely ? Did u try to use subinterfaces ? -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a french computer science school EPITA Telecom & Network specialization CISCO Certified Network Associate EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ""Leigh Anne Chisholm"" a icrit dans le message news: [EMAIL PR

RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16891]

2001-08-22 Thread Baety Wayne A1C 18 CS/SCBX
Even with no IP classless the longest match rule still applies and the longest match for a destination is always chosen, regardless of the administrative distance of the learning protocol. The reason for this is to avoid global routing loops. This has been clearly stated in rfcs, even before thin

OT:National Rebellion Day [7:16928]

2001-08-22 Thread Hartnell, George
On this date in 1775, England declared the colonies in a 'state of rebellion'. Let's all keep up the good work! Best, G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16928&t=16928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info

Re: CCNP Routing Exam [7:16913]

2001-08-22 Thread Stephane LITKOWSKI
Are percentage the same for BSCN, BCMSN, CIT and BCRAN ? I will take the BCMSN exam in 2 weeks. thanks -- Stiphane LITKOWSKI Student in a computer science school EPITA Telecom & Network specialization CISCO Certified Network Associate ""Randy Lopez"" a icrit dans le message news: [EMAIL P

RE: 2924xl-en management interface [7:16899]

2001-08-22 Thread Tim Medley
you need to designate the vlan 2 interface as the management interface. To do this, use the interface command, Management. Heres an example. router# config t router(config)# interface vlan 2 router (config-if)# managment tm Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld --

Re: What type console cable for Cisco 1003? [7:16844]

2001-08-22 Thread richard dumoulin
To be sure your roll-over cable works, try another one.If it does not, try with a straight through cable. Some Cisco routers work this way. If you still experience problems, check your Hyperterminal config to be 9600 etc... It is also possible that the speed has been setup at a lower or higher spe

RE: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Brian
Isnt the correct answer really the first router to boot with a priority above zero?? Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Jim Brown wrote: > If the question were worded, "In OSPF, the DR is chosen with", I might agree > with the Boson answer, but it see

RE: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Tim Medley
Routers use the hello protocol to communicate during the DR election process, the router with the highest priority wins the election. Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wr

Re: Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping to IPs [7:16847]

2001-08-22 Thread richard dumoulin
I agree with Patrick. You may experience firewall or acl's restrictions. As Howard says in one of his tutorials (Routing principles), it is possible that you can Trace and not ping. Ping uses ICMP and Traceroute uses UDP (Cisco uses incremental UDP ports starting from 33000). This means that you h

RE: Input errors and aborts... [7:16873]

2001-08-22 Thread richard dumoulin
Hey, don't forget to tell us if it worked :( Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16920&t=16873 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosur

Re: router boots into rommon mode... [7:16890]

2001-08-22 Thread richard dumoulin
I think you should change the config-register to a value like 0x2102 or something finishing with 2. If I remember well, the number 2 means that the router should load the ios from flash.I believe you have set this value to something like 0x2101 or 0x2100. Regards. note: I need to check this, as

RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

2001-08-22 Thread Baker, Jason
there is one simple answer. the router uses the longest match rule when routing packets. This always takes precendence over administrative distance. > -Original Message- > From: Charles Manafa [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 23 August 2001 8:49 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: CCNP Routing Exam [7:16913]

2001-08-22 Thread richard dumoulin
I believe it is 699 out of 1000 with 62 questions. Following the formula 300+700(x/62)=699,it means that you need [(699-300)/700]*62=35.34 questions out of 62 to pass the exam. Conclusion, you need 57 % to pass. Regards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16916&

RE: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Baker, Jason
B is correct. Proirity and IP both influence who will become the DR. Take this scenario. If you have 10 routers on a LAN with their defaults (meaning they all have a priority of 1 for DR election) how will the DR be chosen purely on Priority ? How will they know the priority of the other route

Re: Loopback0 with Mask of 255.255.255.255 ?? [7:16796]

2001-08-22 Thread Circusnuts
A 32 bit masks is a great way to use the useless for loopbacks. It's been a few months since I've worked with an OSPF network, but I believe this is or was the default value regardless (can't remember the version I was working in @ the time)... All the Best !!! Phil - Original Message -

RE: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Baety Wayne A1C 18 CS/SCBX
Very Slimy question, but... A (MAC) is never used to choose the DR. If two routers are configured with the same priority Then C (Priority) is not used to choose the DR, if they do not have the same priority then D (IP address) is not use to choose the DR. In either case C, and D are not true i

CCNP Routing Exam [7:16913]

2001-08-22 Thread Randy Lopez
I'm currently studying for the CCNP Routing Exam and I wanted to know the Percentage needed to Pass. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16913&t=16913 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.

Re: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>In OSPF, the DR is chosen by >A. MAC >B. Hello Protocol >C. Priority >D. IP > >I chose C but Boson says B. Obviously I have read a 1000 times that the DR >is elected by highest priority, so is Boson wrong here or am I >mis-interpreting the way the question is worded (typical Cisco

Re: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread John Neiberger
If answer C is correct, then what happens when all priorities are equal? Could it still be said that the DR is selected on the basis of Priority alone? What about answer B? Regardless of the interface priority, isn't the DR selected using a hello protocol? John >>> "Eric An" 8/22/01 3:49:43

Re: IP in IP GRE tunneling [7:16833]

2001-08-22 Thread EA Louie
>From Cisco's TAC Support pages at http://www.cisco.com/public/support/tac/home.shtml click Technologies scroll down to Security click General Route Encapsulation click Implementation & Configuration scroll down until you find IPSec with Routing Protocols Using GRE Tunneling http://www.cisco.com/w

Re: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Charles Manafa
Hello protocol is the process by which a DR is elected. Priority influences the election process. CM - Original Message - From: "Wright, Jeremy" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:41 PM Subject: Boson Test Question [7:16895] > In OSPF, the DR is chosen by > A. MAC > B. Hello Prot

Re: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread David L. Blair
E-mail the author of the test with your concerns or call Boson directly. Their phone number is on their web page. -dlb ""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In OSPF, the DR is chosen by > A. MAC > B. Hello Protocol > C. Priority > D. IP > > I chose C

Re: 2924xl-en management interface [7:16899]

2001-08-22 Thread Henrique Issamu terada
Did you config the vtp domain , as well vlan two , under vlan database ? Terada At 17:58 22/08/2001 -0400, Wilson, Christian wrote: >I have a 2924xl-en switch that has been erased and reloaded, all the VTP and >VLAN settings are at default. When I assign an IP address to VLAN 2, the >command i

Re: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Ola Shusi
Priority is one of the fields in Hello Protocol - Original Message - From: "Eric An" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:49 PM Subject: Re: Boson Test Question [7:16895] > You are right. I found other wrong answers in Boson test too. > > Eric > ""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in messag

Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

2001-08-22 Thread Charles Manafa
I agree with Brian, these are different route entries, and should all be installed. The route ultimately taken is dependent on the destination. CM - Original Message - From: "Brian" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:42 PM Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797] > On We

Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi, ' Well whilst on about ports. How about TCP sockets at least at one stage they used to be. Once upon a time you referred to a funny "D" shaped thing with 25 little holes in it as an RS232 serial port. Another with 15 pins as an AUI port. Yes Cisco refer to them as "interfaces" but other

it certifications count! [7:16903]

2001-08-22 Thread george gittins
is there a web site that give you the current number for all it certifications out there? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16903&t=16903 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list

Re: 2924xl-en management interface [7:16899]

2001-08-22 Thread John Neiberger
If you're running a later version of the 2924XL software, do the following: conf t int vlan2 ip add 000.111.222.333 255.255.255.0 management This will make VLAN2 your management VLAN. In the older versions (like 11.x) I have no idea how to do this. The 'management' command is unavailable so

NAT using a single interface [7:16902]

2001-08-22 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
I've searched the Groupstudy archives... there's been much speculation as to whether or not this can be done. Has anyone managed to get NAT using a single Ethernet interface to work? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16902&t=16902 --

Re: 2924xl-en management interface [7:16899]

2001-08-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have to shutdown vlan 1 first. After that, VLAN 2 should come up fine. Rob "Wilson, Christian" @groupstudy.com on 08/22/2001 05:58:15 PM Please respond to "Wilson, Christian" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: 2924xl-en management interface [7:168

RE: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Jim Brown
If the question were worded, "In OSPF, the DR is chosen with", I might agree with the Boson answer, but it seems incorrect with the question stated as such. It is fairly ambiguous, but I wouldn't worry about it. You obviously understand the concept and that is what is really important. I wouldn't

Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>What would you consider interface s0.100 to be? Seems pretty logical to me. > >I think you'll find that both the terms interface and port have context >sensitive meanings. If you've ever configured a 3Com netbuilder you'll be >even more convinced of this. I missed the rest of the thread, but I

2924xl-en management interface [7:16899]

2001-08-22 Thread Wilson, Christian
I have a 2924xl-en switch that has been erased and reloaded, all the VTP and VLAN settings are at default. When I assign an IP address to VLAN 2, the command is taken but the interface will not come up, even after issuing a no shutdown command. I am trying to put the management interface in a di

Re: Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Eric An
You are right. I found other wrong answers in Boson test too. Eric ""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In OSPF, the DR is chosen by > A. MAC > B. Hello Protocol > C. Priority > D. IP > > I chose C but Boson says B. Obviously I have read a 1000 time

Boson Test Question [7:16895]

2001-08-22 Thread Wright, Jeremy
In OSPF, the DR is chosen by A. MAC B. Hello Protocol C. Priority D. IP I chose C but Boson says B. Obviously I have read a 1000 times that the DR is elected by highest priority, so is Boson wrong here or am I mis-interpreting the way the question is worded (typical Cisco)

Re: router boots into rommon mode... [7:16890]

2001-08-22 Thread md
Maybe try adding: boot system flash file.bin to the config file. Just a shot. Maybe someone else may have a better anwser - mike dye -- Open Domain Service - www.ods.org - On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Sean Knox wrote: > Hello all, > > I recently erased a flash card and reloaded an IOS image o

Re: IP in IP GRE tunneling [7:16833]

2001-08-22 Thread Sam Deckert
Would you be able to post a sample config of GRE IP/IP tunnelling over the Internet (with and without IPSec?)?? That would be great. Having a bit of trouble with it Thanks! Sam. - Original Message - From: "Juliano Moises da Luz" To: Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:05 AM Subjec

RE: IT'S NOT A FLOOR WAX, IT'S A DESSERT TOPPING! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Elvis Costello
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text] Hence the common maritime vernacular term "any port in a storm" (not to be confused with the roughly parallel networking vernacular term "any port in a [broadcast] storm") It sure would sound silly to seek out "any interface in

Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16891]

2001-08-22 Thread John Neiberger
Yes, the presence of 'no ip classless' (or ip clueless as I like to call it) can have an effect. For the purposes of our discussion I was assuming ip classless. Assuming 'no ip classless' needlessly muddies the waters, in my opinion. However, point taken. We all should be aware of the differen

router boots into rommon mode... [7:16890]

2001-08-22 Thread Sean Knox
Hello all, I recently erased a flash card and reloaded an IOS image on a 7500 (RSM in a Catalyst 5500). After booting that image, I then issued a "config-register " to set the config register to the value specified in show versions. Yet, every reboot, the router loads in rommon mode and I nee

RE: incorrect TCP checksum [7:16776]

2001-08-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
What is reporting the TCP checksum error? I'm just wondering. Is it an OS error report? It is probably either the sender or the receiver causing the problem as far as I can tell. Routers shouldn't have any effect. They don't change or check the TCP checksum, under normal circumstances. There

pix snmp question [7:16888]

2001-08-22 Thread george gittins
I runing mrtg behind the firewall , and im monitoring my network inside the firewall, however when i try to get info from the router on the outside , i get an timeout error. question is does anyone here have that problem, relating to snmp due to a pix? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.

RE: Input errors and aborts... [7:16873]

2001-08-22 Thread Marshal Schoener
Thanks a million, guys! I'll give it a try... I appreciate the replys :) -Original Message- From: Bolton, Travis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Input errors and aborts... [7:16873] I forgot about the dip switched CS

RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]

2001-08-22 Thread Anatoly Shein
Actually I talking about RedHat Linux 6.2 kernel 2.2 I set the card IP to 0.0.0.0 as well as MAC to 00:00:00:00:00:00 deny arp and multicasts. But I still not sure that this solve security problems. Yes, of cause, I can't be silent before I plug out cable from the network socket. The problem that

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread John Neiberger
And if I use a word that sounds like "too", how do you know if I'm saying to, two, or two? Context!! If you say port, I might think you're either referring to a place where boats tie up to docks or you might be discussing wine. Or you could be "porting" software from one platform to another. T

What's the relationship between SAP and EIGRP/NLSP? [7:16884]

2001-08-22 Thread Jerry Seven
Hi, This one really confused me. I know SAP is a protocol that carris IPX server information, it's in protocol type 4 and is needed when running IPX RIP. My question is when EIGRP or NLSP is running, do they already have the SAP information in their packets or we still need to run SAP exchange

RE: incorrect TCP checksum [7:16776]

2001-08-22 Thread Anatoly Shein
Hi Thank you for full answer. Actually it is not academic question. I found this in many sites and it looks to be similar problem. My interest is this specific problem, because despite of the other kind of retransmissions I can't be sure in the reason of wrong TCP checksum. Also the problem is tha

RE: Input errors and aborts... [7:16873]

2001-08-22 Thread Bolton, Travis
I would even reset the CSU first before replacing it. That's worked for me in the past. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Input errors and aborts... [7:16873] If you're getting

RE: Input errors and aborts... [7:16873]

2001-08-22 Thread Bolton, Travis
I forgot about the dip switched CSU's. If you have one of those make sure to verify that the dip switches are in their proper positions. Those older CSU's tend to lose thier configs easily and I usually have to just verify the dip switches to bring it back up. -Original Message- From: J

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
Well, you have me there. I know you're talking about layer 2 because my Catalyst 1900 tells me so. Switch1924#show interface ethernet 0/1 Ethernet 0/1 is Suspended-no-linkbeat Hardware is Built-in 10Base-T Address is 00B0.64D1.F741 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbits 802.1d STP State: Forwarding

RE: Input errors and aborts... [7:16873]

2001-08-22 Thread John Neiberger
Very good point, especially if you have a model that is software programmable. In that case, a power reset might do the trick. If you have the type that just has dip switches, I don't know if it would help but it certainly wouldn't hurt to try it first anyway. You just never know sometimes, so

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow
I am not without grammatical error. never said i was. BUT, If i say interface 3, you know im taking about an interface. if i say port 3, you have no idea what layer im at, do you? -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:27

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
You should get slapped around for not capitalizing the first letter of a sentence or the word "I", and for not using punctuation properly. Let he who is without grammatical error cast the first misplaced modifier. -Original Message- From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wedne

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow
yeah, but i grew up getting slapped around everytime i referred to it as a port. i have "interface" embedded in my language =) we can stop this thread though, i suppose, instead of starting a holy war =) -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednes

Re: Input errors and aborts... [7:16873]

2001-08-22 Thread John Neiberger
If you're getting more than a couple of those errors following a power outage then you most likely have a problem in your CSU/DSU or your telco has an issue. My guess is the latter but you never know. If you have the means, swap out CSU/DSUs to eliminate that. Or, as a first step have your telc

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
and act on or communicate with each other Port: a hardware interface by which a computer communicates with another device or system So who really decided which was more correct--interface or port? Who set that standard? When you talk about BRI on a router, is it a "Basic Rate Interface Interfa

Input errors and aborts... [7:16873]

2001-08-22 Thread Marshal Schoener
I know some people have been getting upset about putting 'real world' problems on the list, so I apologize in advance to those people :) To make a long story short, I have 2 locations on the same NT domain... Both locations are connected by a T1 and 1600 routers. Everything was fine, until Frid

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Wilson, Bradley
Here's how I like to deal with questions like this: Will knowing the answer ever help you troubleshoot a problem? "Oh, geez, I know what I've been doing wrong - I've been calling it a *port* when it's really an *interface*!! I'll have it up in a few seconds, sorry about that" ;-) -

Re: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-22 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
Since we are talking about new networking terms you coined one the other day Priscilla. It was in the splitting the group string. You described people coming on this list, asking horribly worded questions, that were probably quickly "brain-dumped" to a palm pilot then regurgitated here. This is af

Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Van Oene
What would you consider interface s0.100 to be? Seems pretty logical to me. I think you'll find that both the terms interface and port have context sensitive meanings. If you've ever configured a 3Com netbuilder you'll be even more convinced of this. I missed the rest of the thread, but I don'

Re: Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping to IPs [7:16847]

2001-08-22 Thread Patrick Ramsey
Sounds like firewall issues... high icmp ports might be open, whereas low are not and smtp and web are not... maybe all low ip service ports are being blocked and all highs are being allowed from some freaky ACL Try removing all acl's and start from ground zero. -Patrick >>> "Kiran Kumar M

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow
YES! Yes they do! So does juniper in all of their manuals. and in their configs as well. they are wrong also! We must keep these evil minions at bay. All! Join me! -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:02 PM To: [E

Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
Then why are they called port adapters you know slot/adapter/port serial 0/1/2 would be in the first slot second adapter third port that is where i would interface my cable coming from the dsu 30 minutes to the big seat - the written 8 months to the big stand - the lab and there i go goofing aroun

Re: Able to Traceroute but Unable to ping to IPs [7:16847]

2001-08-22 Thread Kiran Kumar M
Did Anyone faced the following problem anytime? > Hai, > > Can anyone please response, I am facing following problem with the > following IPs. I am able to traceroute to that IPs, but unable to ping. At > the same time Mail and web servers on that IPs are also not > accessible. Can any body sug

Secure ID for Routers [7:16865]

2001-08-22 Thread Nabil Fares
Greetings all, I want to test secure ID to implement on our routers, any of you guys prefer certain product? I also want to use the hardware version of secure ID (little credit card look alike). Thanks..Nabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16865&t=16865

Re: Command to route directly to host [7:16820]

2001-08-22 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
or an interface on a switch a hole in a ship :>) - Original Message - From: "Peter Slow" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:57 AM Subject: RE: Command to route directly to host [7:16820] > you meant a router INTERFACE. > a port is a tcp or udp port. > > > -Original Message--

Re: What type console cable for Cisco 1003? [7:16844]

2001-08-22 Thread Ednilson Rosa
A rollover cable should work! Maybe you have a defective router. Ednilson Rosa - Original Message - From: "Romeo" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:09 PM Subject: What type console cable for Cisco 1003? [7:16844] I have a 1003 router but without the console cable. I tryed to con

RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow
if you guys would just stop using hubs and non-unicast mac-addresses, we'd all be fine =) -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]

RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]

2001-08-22 Thread Patrick Ramsey
Discovering a sniffer on the machine? upon root compromise I can assure you tcpdump will be there regardless... :) And on the NT machine, netcat. Hell if it's NT and sitting on the internet, it probably already has netcat on it... :) to original poster: To unbind ip from the nt machine, sim

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow
Yipes! Yer right! I meant UDP! No offense taken, and in my opinion nothing said on this news grop should be taken personally unless explicity stated that doing so should be done. (huh?) -humboldt -Original Message- From: Marshal Schoener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, Augus

Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread sam sneed
Well, I see the terminology police are at it again ""Peter Slow"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface. > a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count. > i meant like tcp p

Re: DHCP on Ethernet interface [7:16746]

2001-08-22 Thread Paul Werner
I feel your pain, but keep this all in perspective. You will ultimately be able to get some form of high speed data over cable access. Where I live here in the PRNV( People's Republik of Northern Virginia), I am within 20 miles of five of the world's largest ISPs. The best access I can get

Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Does the IEEE get it wrong? Check IEEE 802.1D, the bridging standard. It uses ports for the physical "interfaces" on a bridge (switch). Priscilla At 01:08 PM 8/22/01, Peter Slow wrote: >an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface. >a port is a logical device, and NO a loopba

Re: The choice of default-network [7:16777]

2001-08-22 Thread Sasha
Hi, If all 5 default networks are reachable from your router, then, all five will be considered as candidate defaults (will be marked with * in RT). However, only one of five will be chosen as a gateway of last resort. The choice is based on a comparison of administrative distances: the route wit

RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]

2001-08-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
The issue isn't someone coming in the promiscuous interface. The issue is a hacker compromising the machine by getting in another interface and discovering that there is sniffer software on the machine. You have made the hacker's job really easy. Of course, a good hacker would be able to insta

Re: incorrect TCP checksum [7:16776]

2001-08-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Is this an academic question or are you actually seeing TCP checksum errors? I have never seen a TCP checksum error, so I wondered. Well, I have seen them when people change the data in Sniffer traces without recalculating the checksum, but that's not "real world." In answer to your question,

RE: Netbeyond Etherswitch 1220 [7:16788]

2001-08-22 Thread Sapp Andrew
I have one of those switches and I have upgraded it to the lastest version of enterprise firmware. It is menu based with no option for a CLI. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16854&t=16788 -- FAQ, list archives, and

SE Practice Lab v1.0GG [7:16852]

2001-08-22 Thread Jim Brown
Does anyone have the solution for this lab? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16852&t=16852 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

Re: What type console cable for Cisco 1003? [7:16844]

2001-08-22 Thread Paul C
Please check here http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/1000ig/1003_d oc/78907.htm#xtocid736213 ""Romeo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a 1003 router but without the console cable. I tryed to connect it > with a rollover cable fro

RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Marshal Schoener
Uh, I think you meant UDP ports!!! If you are going to get on peoples cases for being wrong, at least try and be correct ;) No offense of course :) -Original Message- From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: THEY

RE: DHCP problems on bridged WAN over Frame Relay [7:16834]

2001-08-22 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
I will try that right away Peter, hold on. .GREAT! - It worked. I have never before dealt with the DHCP nor bridged WAN on Cisco routers, so that was a pleasant little experience, and I am now a little smarter :-) Thanks again Peter, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews

Re: A new networking term - thoughts? [7:16668]

2001-08-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 11:59 PM 8/21/01, Tony Medeiros wrote: >I always thought "split horizon" was a non intuitive term anyway. iBGP or >whatever. Some engineers come up with the strangest names for things. > >Split horizon implys there is a big tree that is obstructing my view of the >sunset. :>0 Is it a spannin

RE: DHCP problems on bridged WAN over Frame Relay [7:16834]

2001-08-22 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
I was already in the middle of doing so - sorry for not thinking of that before posting the message. I am able to ping RouterC from my Win98, but I cannot ping any futher than that, so something is not being switched between interfaces I guess. However, as it many times goes when you have to exp

  1   2   >