Re: new CIT [7:47777]

2002-07-01 Thread Ashir73 \(CubeXSPlanet.com\)
guide me which is the best hdsl modems to carry E1 on a single copper pair Kind Regards, Ashir - Original Message - From: Mark Odette II To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:21 AM Subject: RE: new CIT [7:4] They haven't reduced them by any means I took the exam and

RE: new CIT [7:47777]

2002-07-01 Thread Mark Odette II
Ashir, I could be wrong, but I think an E1 circuit and an HDSL circuit are two different things! To support HDSL circuit though, a quick search on CCO for HDSL turned up the Cisco 1401 and 1417 xDSL Routers. The 1401 has an ATM25 jack- which I think is just a 6-pin telco phone-jack connector,

Unknown Error [7:47822]

2002-07-01 Thread Reza
Hi Group I got this message from my Cisco 3662 fastethernet interface , : %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error my cables , HUB , are working properly , but this still hapens. plz tell me what this erros means .. Thanks Reza Message Posted at:

RE: Automatic Backup Question [7:47652]

2002-07-01 Thread Andrew Larkins
What about configuring dialer watch. Here you preconfigure a route that needs to be monitored. when the route disappears, the backup route takes over -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 June 2002 16:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Automatic Backup

RE: interface resets sh int [7:47668]

2002-07-01 Thread Andrew Larkins
the reliability of the line is not very good. If the telco says all is correct, then you need to verify your cables and port. I have had a similar issue, where the actual port on the router had gone and gave the same results. -Original Message- From: Gary Crouch [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Unknown Error [7:47822]

2002-07-01 Thread rmart.
usually duplex mismatch.. try manually set to half duplex - Original Message - From: Reza To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 15:36 Subject: Unknown Error [7:47822] Hi Group I got this message from my Cisco 3662 fastethernet interface , : %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit

PPPOE [7:47827]

2002-07-01 Thread Mamoon Dawood
Dear All, We are facing a problem configuring a PIX firewall as follows: Our customer connects his LAN to the internet using an ADSL modem, the ADSL connects by an ethernet connection to the LAN internet server Ethernet card, the ISP installs a special software called CFOS on the internet

Flash init failed (permission denied). [7:47825]

2002-07-01 Thread Marian Iordanescu
Hi group, I have the folowing problem. have Found You the solution for this problem yet? C2950 Boot Loader (CALHOUN-HBOOT-M) Version 12.0(5.3)WC(1), MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE Compiled Mon 30-Apr-01 07:56 by devgoyal WS-C2950-24 starting... Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:07:84:f9:09:40

Routing problem [7:47828]

2002-07-01 Thread Waqar Ahmed
Hi, I am facing problem in OSPF routing. I have configured area 0 for ethernet network and area 1 for point to point network as secondary IP address on same ethernet interface. I have advertise both networks in OSPF but could not get routes of secondary network. Please advice.

Re: Unknown Error [7:47822]

2002-07-01 Thread LongTrip
On the TAC site there is an Error Message Decoder (account needed). It is great for helping you with the generated errors. Kim From: Reza Date: 2002/07/01 Mon AM 03:36:04 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unknown Error [7:47822] Hi Group I got this message from my Cisco 3662

Took the MPLS exam and flunked [7:47830]

2002-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Group, Today I took the MPLS exam and I flunked.I used the book MPLS and VPN architecture(First edition) by Ivan Pepelnjak.From my experience this book is not sufficient to prepare for the exam.About the exam it is not too toughf, if proper material would have been there. The passing mark is

VIC 2 BRI S/T TE: Unexpected indication (18) in f3 code [7:47831]

2002-07-01 Thread TP
Dear group, I have a cisco 2621 configured as voip/isdn gateway. I'm not in able to configure properly vic 2BRI S/T TE interface. I've followed suggestion from this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri-layer1.html#first (shut, no shut, clear interface and isdn-tei-negotiation

Re: VIC 2 BRI S/T TE: Unexpected indication (18) in f3 code [7:47833]

2002-07-01 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Is their circuit up and active? Also, check the wiring. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. TP wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear group, I have a cisco 2621 configured as voip/isdn gateway. I'm not in able to configure properly vic 2BRI S/T TE interface. I've

RE: Routing problem [7:47828]

2002-07-01 Thread Chris Harshman
you can only have one address per interface in an OSPF area. The secondary can only be in the same area as the primary for OSPF to generate an LSA for that network. If you want to get it to work and don't have another physical interface, use a loopback and remove the secondary.Waqar Ahmed

RE: PPPOE [7:47827]

2002-07-01 Thread ken clifford
(watch the wrap) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47834t=47827 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL

Re: Took the MPLS exam and flunked [7:47830]

2002-07-01 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Hi Group, Today I took the MPLS exam and I flunked.I used the book MPLS and VPN architecture(First edition) by Ivan Pepelnjak.From my experience this book is not sufficient to prepare for the exam.About the exam it is not too toughf, if proper material would have been there. The passing mark is

New CCNP study guides [7:47837]

2002-07-01 Thread David yuten
I heard a message from Yahoo group, Info4Cert released it's guaranteed new CCNP study guides. I want to buy all, but I haven't got enough money, anybody want to get them and we share. I can afford one. I tried their MCSE and OCP DBA 9i study guides, they works perfect! You could check their

RE: OT: Who are the financially viable carriers? [7:47655]

2002-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just saw an evaluation of all major carriers (wonder why!). Sprint and ATamp;T were even on their financial situation and were in front of the pack by far. The key indicator for me, since I have to deal with them, was that Sprint had a higher customer satisfaction rating. Probably due to smaller

Re: Took the MPLS exam and flunked [7:47830]

2002-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I have read the RFC 2547 and 2917 and understood the MPLS VPN architecture from it.What I experienced is just if I know the RFC alone is not sufficient. To pass the cisco mpls exam I should know in a cisco centric way.I feel there are certain things in the exam which can be answered if I

Re: Off Topic - message post times off? [7:47774]

2002-07-01 Thread Paul Borghese
Ok, ok! I now have the system clock synchronized with a stratum 2 NTP server. I also changed the time from EST to UTC. You can always see what time it is by going to the forums on groupstudy.com. The first purple line has the system time on the right. Trivia Question: What is the difference

RE: Took the MPLS exam and flunked [7:47830]

2002-07-01 Thread Mike Bernico
I passed that one a few months ago. It was quite challenging, but if your on your way to CCIP you've probably already taken MCAST/QoS which is another tough test. To prepare I used MPLS and VPN architectures by Ivan Pepelnjak and also Advanced MPLS Design and Implementation by Vivek Alwayn.

Re: PIX 501 [7:47693]

2002-07-01 Thread MADMAN
Talking with a co-worker I think we got it figured out. E1 on the PIX 501 is really a virtual interface, you actually have four ethernet interfaces, a hub, on the inside. Therefore I don't know what relevance there is in having ethernet1 show up as 10 full as it's most likely the internal

CCIE Lab Preparation workbook [7:47776]

2002-07-01 Thread Silju Pillai
HI, Which lab workbook (RS) is the best to prepare for the lab... 1. IP Expert 2. CCBootcamp 3. Hello Computers 4. Boson 5. CCIE Practical Studies (Karl Solie)- Volume 1. regards, Silju Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47776t=47776

Re: NDA violations (FW: New Legal Agreement--Cisco [7:47814]

2002-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But if I can't be traced. Hu ideas... Personally, I can agree to not give information which would help someone to pass the test without even reading the questions like for the MCSE braindumps . Additionally, telling people which page to read in a book would be taking it too far.

RE: Study Guide for the Written Exam [7:47793]

2002-07-01 Thread ken clifford
alot of people recommend Network Learning Inc's CCIE Written Study Guide and of course CCIE Exam Cram is never a bad thing. www.certificationzone.com and www.boson.com have tests and articles. Just my two cents. KC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47796t=47793

Re: Who are the financially viable carriers? [7:47655]

2002-07-01 Thread Steve Ringley
Indeed, somebody finally summarized MPLS in a couple of sentences rather than a white paper. Our company left ATT due to poor service last year for Worldcom. At Worldcom someone answers when you call, and they usually call back with progress on a regular basis. At ATT, you get to leave a voice

Re: Any last minute words of advice? [7:47798]

2002-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is not as hard as you might think. I passed it with soaring marks when I thought it was going to be 10x harder than it was. New NDA is censoring me.Moderator---ever think of locating the server outside of the States so we can enjoy the 1st amendment??? If you freak out, use Boson #1.

Re: Re: Any last minute words of advice? [7:47798]

2002-07-01 Thread LongTrip
Thank you for your reply Theo. It takes a bit of the edge off. Tests make me a bit ansi, crouchy ..oh I know the word, but it is not good to put into an email. Don't worry about the censoring. The NDA is there for a reason and if it keeps the standard(s) of the certification(s) high then I

CCIE Written [7:47835]

2002-07-01 Thread Reza
Hi Group, I passed the CCIE written last week. I like to thank every body in this group for your input. This is a great group. I have to say that Boson #3 by Dennis is excellent. Thanks Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47835t=47835

RE: 351-001 Beta Written Exam [7:47770]

2002-07-01 Thread ken clifford
I got my score not quite as good as you 36%. I just got my results last week. Overall I liked it better. I am going to Networkers Orlando as well and am also taking the 350-001 exam (Tuesday) Monday I have the CCIE PS. I feel pretty darn ready. I'm passing all the bosons and

RE: PPPOE [7:47827]

2002-07-01 Thread Peter zhang
Make sure your pix firewall software is 6.2, or you can put a router in front of it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47843t=47827 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Looking for CCIE lab partner in Chicago (Plainfield,IL) area [7:47845]

2002-07-01 Thread kevhed
Looking for a lab partner around the Plainfield, IL area (50 miles SW of Chicago). I've got the r/s lab sched for Feb. Looking for someone who is relatively close as to reduce the travel times. Kevin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47845t=47845

OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]

2002-07-01 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
Anyone from the list going? Is there going to be a GroupStudy gathering? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47846t=47846 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

Confusion: Channelized and Unchannelized T1 [7:47844]

2002-07-01 Thread John Neiberger
Just when I thought I understood the T1 world pretty well we've run into a situation that is thoroughly confusing me. I was under the impression that channelized T1 services used 24 timeslots. I call that 'channelized' because it has 24 distinct 'channels'. It's my understanding that

Re: Written Exam [7:47797]

2002-07-01 Thread Dennis Laganiere
Since this question comes up all the time, I put together a document that outlines the common wisdom for CCIE Written preparation. I listed several useful books (not to mention my own). You can grab the document for free from www.laganiere.net (as well as several other sites that have posted the

enable password (encryption???) Please help [7:47847]

2002-07-01 Thread Morgan Hansen
Hi all! Hmm... Im quite new to this all and was wondering if some of you might want to help me with a little problem of mine :-) ? Today someone told me that one could encrypt the privileged mode password, that is NOT the secret password wich is encrypted by default as ive gatherd (?). The

ATM IMA interface problems [7:47849]

2002-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all, I'm having a problem with my IMA interface on a 7206 running 12.2(5) (c7200-ds-mz.122-5.bin). When I switched from UBR to VBR-NRT the pvc I was working on disappeared from the running config and no data will pass through that circuit. I tried to add the pvc back into the config but

RE: enable password (encryption???) Please help [7:47847]

2002-07-01 Thread John Kelley
You can encrypt passwords but you will need this statement in the router/switch aside from the default secret password. The command is: service password-encryption Hope this helps and someone please correct me if Im wrong...Im learning too... :o) -JK Message Posted at:

Re: enable password (encryption???) Please help [7:47847]

2002-07-01 Thread chris
service password-encrytion Chris Morgan Hansen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all! Hmm... Im quite new to this all and was wondering if some of you might want to help me with a little problem of mine :-) ? Today someone told me that one could encrypt the

Re: enable password (encryption???) Please help [7:47847]

2002-07-01 Thread A N
conf t service password-encryption - Original Message - From: Morgan Hansen To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:03 PM Subject: enable password (encryption???) Please help [7:47847] Hi all! Hmm... Im quite new to this all and was wondering if some of you might want to help me with

Re: enable password (encryption???) Please help [7:47847]

2002-07-01 Thread Tunji Suleiman
The command is: service password-encryption Tunji From: Morgan Hansen Reply-To: Morgan Hansen To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: enable password (encryption???) Please help [7:47847] Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 17:03:33 GMT Hi all! Hmm... Im quite new to this all and was wondering if some of you

RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]

2002-07-01 Thread Larry Perdue
I will be attending Networkers in Orlando, I am also scheduled for the CCIE PS on Monday. -Original Message- From: R. Benjamin Kessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]

Dual Link redundancy .... [7:47854]

2002-07-01 Thread Paul
I have two switches that will be connected over fibre ... two connections at each end (hope you like the top Ascii art :)) | 1 |---| 1 | | A | | B | |_2 _|---|_2_ | How can I fix it so that if A1-B1

RE: Who are the financially viable carriers? [7:47655]

2002-07-01 Thread Munoz, Michael
Since I noticed a plug for another company I'll throw in my 2 cents. I'm not sure what services you are looking for but we offer quite a few and have a good global presence. While most company's are in piles of debt, we have a surplus of cash. Even after making acquisitions such as Exodus, we

Auch, not following you :( [7:47856]

2002-07-01 Thread Morgan Hansen
Hi and thanx for all the input guys! 99 out of a 100 of you managed to give me this answer: service password-encrytion Therefore i gather it must be correct:-) Still, (feeling kinda dumb now, but?) I guess youre gonna have to give it to me like a 2 year old :( What I was wondering is:

RE: enable password (encryption???) Please help [7:47847]

2002-07-01 Thread Dan Penn
What you are looking for is: service password-encryption. It is simple encryption (compared to the md5 hash of the enable secret). Its only real use is not showing a clear text password on a show run/start. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On

Re: Auch, not following you :( [7:47856]

2002-07-01 Thread John Golovich
Isn't enable password just the older form of enable secret? Enable secret works over enable password. So if you have an enable secret you do not need an enable password. --- Morgan Hansen wrote: Hi and thanx for all the input guys! 99 out of a 100 of you managed to give me this

Re: interface resets sh int [7:47668]

2002-07-01 Thread Brad
Gary, you can use extended ping testing to try to uncover if it is in fact a telco line problem from :http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p53-cover.html Extended Ping Testing The ping command is generally used to make sure that two devices that are remote from one another can

interface resets sh int [7:47668]

2002-07-01 Thread Brad
you can use extended ping testing to try to uncover if it is in fact a telco line problem from :http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p53-cover.html Extended Ping Testing The ping command is generally used to make sure that two devices that are remote from one another can attain

RE: ATM IMA interface problems [7:47849]

2002-07-01 Thread Karagozian Sarkis
The VBR-NRT parameters musr matche the ATM Carrier Switch settings. So If the Carrier ATM Switch is set for UBR then You can't just change your ATM interface parmaeters from UBR to VBR/NRT. You have to match the Carrier ATM Switch settings only. Also try: sh atm vc to see the VPI/VCI values of

Re: Auch, not following you :( [7:47856]

2002-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can specify a Hidden password, but it still shows up in the configure without the service password-encrytion command. But even with the encryption, there are still quite a few scripts that will break this encryption. -Rob Michel Morgan Hansen @groupstudy.com on 07/01/2002 01:15:13 PM

Please tell me it isnt so :( [7:47863]

2002-07-01 Thread Morgan Hansen
Hi, and once again Helo :-) Ive just received this note at my inbox: Isn't enable password just the older form of enable secret? Reading this allmost made me go into shock! Is this true??! Cause if it is im out of werdz(?) For allmost a year now I have with 30 something other youngsters

RE: Dual Link redundancy .... [7:47854]

2002-07-01 Thread Chris Harshman
Configure both links as trunks then form an ether-channel. Both links will pass traffic but a failure of one will not affect the other. Cisco Example: set trunk 1/1 dot1q on set trunk 1/2 dot1q on set port channel 1/1-2 on Message Posted at:

Re: Auch, not following you :( [7:47856]

2002-07-01 Thread Bob Timmons
If your current config looks like this: enable configure terminal hostname Lab-Whatever enable password cisco enable secret class you'd then simply add service password-encryption Then, when you look at your config (show run), you'd see: Current configuration: ! version (whatever version)

RE: Dual Link redundancy .... [7:47854]

2002-07-01 Thread Blair, Philip S
Check out Fast Etherchannel (watch for wrapping) http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/techno/media/lan/ether/channel/tech/fe tec_wp.htm -Original Message- From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dual Link redundancy

Re: Please tell me it isnt so :( [7:47863]

2002-07-01 Thread Craig Columbus
As a general rule, the enable password and the enable secret password grant the same privilege level of access to the router. The enable secret works as a one way hash (MD5) and is very difficult to break (there are tools, like John the Ripper, that will do so given enough time). The enable

Its not fair! [7:47868]

2002-07-01 Thread Morgan Hansen
WOW! Im getting this form everyone now it seams; Enable secret works over enable password. So if you have an enable secret you do not need an enable password. And if this is correct, then ok, cool, im fine with it, no problem and thanx allot guys! What I DO have problems with though is

RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]

2002-07-01 Thread ken clifford
I'm going. I'd be interested in a groupstudy get together. I am taking the CCIE PS on Monday and 350-001 exam on Tuesday morning. Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47869t=47846 -- FAQ, list archives, and

Re: ATM IMA interface problems [7:47849]

2002-07-01 Thread Chuck
did you remember to do a shut/no shut on the physical ATM interface after you made the change? also, idle curiousity - how many T1's are you inverse multiplexing? Was the circuit ever working? I ask because sometimes when you have a single ATM T1, the telcos do not terminate it to an IMA port,

RE: Please tell me it isnt so :( [7:47863]

2002-07-01 Thread Roberts, Larry
Yep, enable password is a less securely encrypted form. If you use Enable Secret then that password is the one you use. The password for logging into the router is set in a couple of places: If you telnet into the router, it's set under the Line vty port 0 x Console access is under the Line

RE: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-07-01 Thread Peter zhang
what is the difference between nat (inside) 1 0 0 and nat 1 0 0 They are the same, nat all inside networks I am completely lost when to use netmask when not. Some statements are required to have one some not. Is there any rule about it that or I just have to memorize all.

Re: Please tell me it isnt so :( [7:47863]

2002-07-01 Thread Paul Borghese
Ugh! Your teachers are incorrect. The enable password and enable secret perform the same function. The difference is how they are stored in the configuration. The enable password is encrypted using Cisco's type 7 password encryption. This encryption is very easy to break thus making your

Re: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-07-01 Thread Gaz
Must admit I've not seen it without the (interface) option. Does the nat 1 0 0 format equate to: nat (inside) 1 0 0 and nat (DMZ) 1 0 0 or just the inside interface? Not got a Pix to try it on until tomorrow, or at least if I do I'll probably lose the Pix I'm VPN'ing through :-) Gaz Peter

Re: Flash init failed (permission denied). [7:47825]

2002-07-01 Thread Gaz
You don't seem to have any flash in there. Open the box and re-seat the flash chip if there's one there. Marian Iordanescu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi group, I have the folowing problem. have Found You the solution for this problem yet? C2950 Boot

Re: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]

2002-07-01 Thread Paul Borghese
Sure. I will be there. Two years ago we had a GroupStudy dinner in Orlando. Anyone else interested? Paul - Original Message - From: ken clifford To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:21 PM Subject: RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846] I'm going. I'd be interested in a groupstudy

RE: Its not fair! [7:47868]

2002-07-01 Thread Dan Penn
Welcome to the world of the network academy... There are instances when it would be good to have both enable and enable secret set. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan Hansen Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]

2002-07-01 Thread Terry Hines
Im in I hope to take 001 next month -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846] I'm going. I'd be interested in a groupstudy get together. I am taking

Re: Its not fair! [7:47868]

2002-07-01 Thread Gaz
Just in case you're under the impression that these changes have been brought in some time during your classes and it's Cisco's fault for not telling you: Unless you've been studying for at least 4 or 5 years (or thereabouts), then nothing has changed. It's been this way for a long time. Make

Re: ATM IMA interface problems [7:47849]

2002-07-01 Thread Henry D.
This is going to be of no help to you but when we used these cards to bundle multiple T1's we had nothing good to say about the way it worked. There were multiple issues, i.e looping one T1 would cause the whole bundle to go down. Clearing groups like removing one T1 from the bundle was causing

RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]

2002-07-01 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
Sounds good. When? Where? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846] Sure. I will be there. Two years ago we had a

Re: Its not fair! [7:47868]

2002-07-01 Thread Tom Lisa
Morgan, I have been associated with the Cisco Networking Academy since Version 1 of the curriculum (it has undergone numerous revisions over the last four years). In all that time, it has always properly explained the difference between the ENABLE PASSWORD command and the ENABLE SECRET command.

Anyone recommend an optical reseller? [7:47883]

2002-07-01 Thread Lupi, Guy
I was wondering if anyone could recommend a reseller that they have had good dealings with in the New York area. Finding it hard to find someone who deals with the ONS product line, Cisco's website is useless. Guy H. Lupi CCIE No. 9275 Message Posted at:

RE: Please tell me it isnt so :( [7:47863]

2002-07-01 Thread Dan Penn
He speaketh the truth. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Please tell me it isnt so :( [7:47863] Ugh! Your teachers are incorrect. The enable

RE: Its not fair! [7:47868]

2002-07-01 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Morgan Hansen Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Its not fair! [7:47868] WOW! Im getting this form everyone now it seams; Enable secret works over enable password. So if you have an enable secret you do not need an enable password. It's a good idea to have

RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]

2002-07-01 Thread Larry Perdue
I'd definitely be up for it. Just post when and where. -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846] Sure. I will be there. Two years ago we

Re: Confusion: Channelized and Unchannelized T1 [7:47844]

2002-07-01 Thread Nigel Taylor
John, There's nothing wrong with your understanding of channelized vs. unchannelized. I believe your provider's tech dosen't understand or is completely mis-informed. Nigel - Original Message - From: John Neiberger To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:10 PM Subject: Confusion:

Re: Confusion: Channelized and Unchannelized T1 [7:47844]

2002-07-01 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I think a channelized T1 sends 193 bit frames as well. 8 for each channel plus 1 for timing = 193. All T1's are channelized, otherwise it would have to be some sort of byte-synch communication, which isn't plausible. I think the tech you spoke to is incorrect as well. John Neiberger wrote

Configuration Maker [7:47889]

2002-07-01 Thread Robert Raver
Hey Group , Im currently developing a program that configure's cisco devices. Im currently on the router section and will be for a very long time. This program is going to go into great more depth then Cisco Config Maker. Before I dive into writing all the commands possible and options in the

Re: OT: Who are the financially viable carriers? [7:47655]

2002-07-01 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Where did you see the eval? Is it something you can e-mail me? wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Just saw an evaluation of all major carriers (wonder why!). Sprint and ATamp;T were even on their financial situation and were in front of the pack by far. The key

RE: Who are the financially viable carriers? [7:47655]

2002-07-01 Thread YASSER ALY
Regardless of who is more financially secure, I would technically vote for CW. Having an overseas circuit from them I rarely faced troubles and even when trouble happens their support is very fast and more important they would say the truth and not start playing games with you. Since I

IGRP/routeing table [7:47892]

2002-07-01 Thread Morgan Hansen
Hi, i was wondering if i may ask you routergods one more question:-). (Oh! and I should say that this question is something I remember from the CCNA exam today. So if anyone of you preffer not to answer in case you see this helping me as me sheeting or likewise im ok with it. Im just stuck

Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893]

2002-07-01 Thread Kazan, Naim
This is off the topic but can you help me with what version of IOS is support by the 7010 router. I was told before end of sale of 7010 router, the highest ios version was 11.0. Is that correct or can I DL 12.0 version to 7010 router. The router is for home lab use only. -Original

Re: ATM IMA interface problems [7:47849]

2002-07-01 Thread Chuck
whoa, now, hold on there! IMA is an open standard. IMA equipment is manufactured by Adtran, Kentrox ( or whomever they are these days ) Nortel, Newbridge, and yes Cisco. Just to name a few that come to mind. Out here in Pacific Bell land a couple of years ago there were severe ATM IMA issues

Re: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893]

2002-07-01 Thread Gaz
Subsequently, software releases will be available for the Cisco 7000/7010 through Software Release 11.2 mainline. However, this will be the last release supported on the platform. from: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/7000/prodlit/615_pp.htm Gaz Kazan, Naim wrote in message [EMAIL

Re: IGRP/routeing table [7:47892]

2002-07-01 Thread Chuck
you know more than you think. just think about it a little more. no hints from me. Morgan Hansen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, i was wondering if i may ask you routergods one more question:-). (Oh! and I should say that this question is something I

TACACS - Radius password authentication [7:47897]

2002-07-01 Thread Morgan Hansen
Hi all:-) Hmm.. Im wondering... What in gods name are TACACS and Radius passwords? I understand I can use them as password authentication, but?? Im sitting here up to my ears with Wave books and the latest Odom 640-607 book and cant find anything on the subject?? Anyone? Best, Morgan

Split tunelling on PIX 520 [7:47898]

2002-07-01 Thread Simer Mayo
How do (or can) you enable split tunnelling on PIX 520? Thanks SM Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47898t=47898 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

RE: TACACS - Radius password authentication [7:47897]

2002-07-01 Thread Dan Penn
Not that we mind helping you, but there is a great wealth of knowledge with a good search engine at cisco.com. They are types of servers that can run AAA applications. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan Hansen Sent: Monday,

Networkers Power Slides [7:47900]

2002-07-01 Thread JohnZ
Does any one have the link to the Power Slides from San Diego Networkers 02. Are these even available yet. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47900t=47900 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893]

2002-07-01 Thread Phil Lorenz
There would probably need to be a post from a current 7000 owner, but a few a few years ago (Y2K) we upgraded many'a 7000 (I believe the 7010s included) from the SSP and RP combination to the RSP1. @ the time it allowed for the 12.0 release and a 4 digit year. All the best Phil -Original

Re: Networkers Power Slides [7:47900]

2002-07-01 Thread Steven A. Ridder
What are the power slides? But they are publically available, I just have to find the link -- RFC 1149 Compliant. JohnZ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does any one have the link to the Power Slides from San Diego Networkers 02. Are these even available

Re: Split tunelling on PIX 520 [7:47898]

2002-07-01 Thread itsme
split-tunnel is the command, set per group. -TV Simer Mayo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... How do (or can) you enable split tunnelling on PIX 520? Thanks SM Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47903t=47898

RE: Dual Link redundancy .... [7:47854]

2002-07-01 Thread Kohli, Jaspreet
Do we need to setup trunks if we have default VLAN1 running only . -Original Message- From: Chris Harshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 July 2002 6:59 a.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Dual Link redundancy [7:47854] Configure both links as trunks then form an

Re: PPPOE [7:47827]

2002-07-01 Thread Ronnie Higginbotham
Had the same problem. I had some one help me out so I will pass this info on. First you have to be running 6.2 on the firewall on the here is a PDF for cisco's site explaining the PPPoE setup needed http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_62/config/pixc lnt.htm Here are

RE: IGRP/routeing table [7:47892]

2002-07-01 Thread Leo Song
They will not exchange any igrp routing info, since they belongs to different AS system. Leo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan Hansen Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IGRP/routeing table [7:47892]

RE: Unknown Error [7:47822]

2002-07-01 Thread Frank Merrill
I got this message from my Cisco 3662 fastethernet interface , : %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error From the System Error Messages guide: Error Message %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: [chars], transmit error Explanation Late collisions have occurred on the Ethernet or Fast

Re: Please tell me it isnt so :( [7:47863]

2002-07-01 Thread Steve Ringley
One thing I have not seen discussed yet is why you would have both in the config. Older routers like 2500s with REAL boot roms did not intially support enable secret. You thus had to have an enable password configured so that if the router crashed to boot rom, it still had some protection. If

Re: Split tunelling on PIX 520 [7:47898]

2002-07-01 Thread Simer Mayo
Can you give me some more info about it? I know split tunneling is a security issue but have to do it for a client. Appreciate your help. THanks - Original Message - From: itsme To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:31 PM Subject: Re: Split tunelling on PIX 520 [7:47898] split-tunnel is

RE: TACACS - Radius password authentication [7:47897]

2002-07-01 Thread Roberts, Larry
Normally you would have a TACACS/RADIUS server ( Cisco's ACS comes to mind ) and a TACACS/RADUS client ( Router/WAP also come to mind) In order for those two devices to communicate you must specify a password that is shared between them. This is used to assure that the Devices in question are who

Re: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-07-01 Thread voitek
Thank you guys, i found some good explanation on cisco: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_62/cmdref/mr.h tm#xtocid6 The nat 1 0 0 command means that all outbound connections can pass through the PIX Firewall with address translation. If you use the nat (inside) 1 0 0

  1   2   >