Hi,
I have an e.g. on neighbor distribute list with Extended ACL (2 lines in
total) but I'm not too sure whether I'm heading the right way...
access-list 101 permit ip 131.108.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0
In this line, I understand that since the wildcard mask for both network
mask are
I will be there and would like to meet up with any members.
Phil
= Original Message From R. Benjamin Kessler
=
Anyone from the list going? Is there going to be a GroupStudy
gathering?
_
Commercial lab list:
I think the main thing to note about cT1s is bit robbed signalling i.e
channel asscociated signalling normally used to transport voice. Therefore,
we've got 7 bits of payload, 1 bit for signalling for every timeslot and 1
bit for framing. Bit robbed signalling would effectively yield a 56 kbps
Hi all
Im going to sit for CCNA soon ,
would you give me the address of some usefull sites
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47925t=47925
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Hi all
Im going to sit for CCNA soon ,
would you give me the address of some usefull sites
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47923t=47923
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Hi all
Im going to sit for CCNA soon ,
would you give me the address of some usefull sites
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47924t=47924
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
the Message waiting thing is the lamp on a phone that lights up indicating
you have voicemail. I have no idea what a dual phones system is.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
supernet wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What means dual phone system? Is it traditional phone
I think even a pure data T1 is channelized. Even the PRI is as well.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Wesley wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think the main thing to note about cT1s is bit robbed signalling i.e
channel asscociated signalling normally used to
Hi John
Thought I would just add a few words from 'T1 A survival guide' from
O'Reilly.
T1 = DS1 delivered over a 4 wire copper interface
DS1 = Digital Stream level 1 - 24 DS0's combined into a DS1 which supplies
1536 kbps connectivity plus 8 kbps framing and signalling overhead for a
total of
Can't I use the port group 1 distribution destination on both switches ???
I tried using set trunk ... but the switch did'nt understand the command ...
the switch is running Version 12.0(5.3) and it is a WS-C3524-XL. I tried
running the set trunk command from global config and int config mode
Hi Paul,
The 3524-XL is not a set based switch. It is an IOS based switch. The
commands would be different. Don't have access to internet / documentation
right now but it would be done under each 'interface' ie. Fastethernet 0/2
etc
Thanks
Manish
-Original Message-
From: Paul
Off of the top of my head, I'd say something like this:
interface FastEthernet 0/1
channel-group 1 mode [auto | desirable | on]
interface FastEthernet 0/2
channel-group 1 mode [auto | desirable | on]
interface Port-Channel 1
HTH,
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
www.HowToPostOnlyOnce.com
Joupin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all
Im going to sit for CCNA soon ,
would you give me the address of some usefull sites
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47933t=47925
Version 12.0(5)WC3b
When I add new 3548's running the code version above it takes the addition or
deletion of a VLAN to get them to receive the update. They would go for
weeks
without seeing an update and not have correct VLAN information until there is
a change in the VTP domain. All I need
muhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47935t=47925
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
Hi Folks,
Quick question
A simple yes / no is all I require. I'll do the research later :)
Can we configure a Cisco Router (3620-Mbundle) to use an RSA ACE Server for
authentication. The users will have Key Fob devices?
Thanks
Manish
Message Posted at:
HEY I LIVE IN PLAINFIELD I was going for the lab July 24th in SJ but I
pushed the panic button. I have a seat for Dec. but I am planning to swap
for a Sept. I have lots of stuff and I could use a partner too. Give me a
ring if you would like at 630-616-5141. BTW Where in Plainfiel;d do
yes
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: Authentication with RSA ACE Server [7:47936]
Hi Folks,
Quick question
A simple yes / no is all I require. I'll do the research later :)
Can we configure a Cisco Router (3620-Mbundle) to use an RSA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
A simple yes / no is all I require. I'll do the research later :)
Can we configure a Cisco Router (3620-Mbundle) to use an RSA ACE Server for
authentication. The users will have Key Fob devices?
yes. we use it on 7200
marcin
Message Posted at:
Mike Bernico wrote:
To prepare I used MPLS and VPN architectures by Ivan Pepelnjak and also
Advanced MPLS Design and Implementation by Vivek Alwayn. The second book
was much more pertinent to the test and I believe is being revised for
test,
but check ciscopress.com for that.
There's a
Found the link finally.
pad
pad
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/update/index.html
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What are the power slides? But they are publically available, I just have
to find the link
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Historically, T1 and E1 are different from HDSL. However, they now use
HDSL in the US to provide 24-channel circuits on a single pair of
copper, as compared to the two pairs used for the traditional T1. I
wouldn't be surprised if a similar situation occurs with HDSL and E1.
Unfortunately, it's
You are in ROM MON mode on the switch. You need to run the suggested
commands
flash_init
load_helper
boot
once you do a flash_init and load_helper you can use the ? to see what
command are available. You will probably need to load an image onto your
switch using xmodem before it
Hi Group,
I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations
to be done on the central site.
Network is hub and spoke fashion.
Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, for
this purpose.
Thanks.
- (on
I am in Orlando, and would like to play if anyone is interested.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47945t=47846
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
Steven,
was a telco problem.
Now I've a different problem.
I'm in able to make voip call (with a bad quality) to pstn, but I'm not in
able to make pstn call to voip.
This is the disconnect cause:
02:26:37: ISDN BR1/0: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x8C
02:26:37: Cause i =
I didn't see the power slides there, where are they?
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Ridder
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: Networkers Power Slides [7:47900]
Found the link finally.
pad
pad
Oops, wrong link.
pad
pad
pad
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
Clayton Dukes wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I didn't see the power slides there, where are they?
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
-
I am assuming that this is refering to a
Point-to-Point T1 Circuit. If so, the telco refers
to
the circuit as unchanelized because they are not
breaking off any channels for you, You are doing
this
yourself with a mux.
Thanks,
Benjamin Pierce
--- Steven A. Ridder wrote:
I think a
Okay we have two 6509s with Sup2/MSFC2 running Native IOS 12.1(8b)E7,
and a Cat5513 running CatOS 4.5(2) with RSM running IOS 11.3(3a)WA4(5). We
have 6509A connected via a Gig trunk (ISL) to 6509B and 6509B connects to
the 5513 via a 4-link FastEtherchannel trunk (ISL). Most of our Novell
At my old job we had pairgain HDSL stuff. They would do anything from
64k on up to 4096 (2 loops on 2 pair). So, yes, you could have 24 ds0's
on one pair of copper.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Tom Scott
Sent: Tuesday, July 02,
Hey Matt,
That's exactly where I got my info from. BTW, that's a really good book to
learn about T1, unchannelized or otherwise. And it goes into HDLC, PPP and
Frame Relay as well. The reindeer on the front cover rocks! hehe
Wes
Matthew Crane wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Morgan,
The 'enable password' command is the original
command that allows you to go to 'priviliged EXEC'
mode and configure the router/switch. Although the
password can be encrypted, it isn't a very robust
technique and can be cracked by putting the password
back into the algorithm.
But why do we have to dial thoese DNs to turn on and off the lamp?
Doesn't the lamp always light up when you get a message? I don't
understand their (MessageWaitingOffDN and MessageWaitingOnDN)
purpose.
Thanks.
Yoshi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Congratulations to you. I passed the written yesterday. What a great
exam...the NLI book and Boson #3 along with CCO were excellent prep
materials. The journey has really just begun. A thank you to all who
contribute to and keep this list moving along. Have a great day!!
Robert
must be nice to have so much money. these all data lines? why in the world
would they not use channelized DS3 at the center? hell of a LOT
cheaper Your telco account manager bying a new boat this summer?
density will be a problem. 7206's with the PA-MC-8T1 cards - that will give
you
yes you can
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47957t=47936
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
Chuck wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
must be nice to have so much money. these all data lines? why in the world
would they not use channelized DS3 at the center? hell of a LOT
cheaper Your telco account manager bying a new boat this summer?
density
Did you enable portfast or use the 'host' macro to set the user ports on
this switch? I have seen this, but it was in a situation where the user
machines had there IPX frame type set to auto. In that case the users
machine would boot up, try and autodetect the IPX frame type in use on the
Cisco Breaker wrote:
Did you disable spanning tree or used portfast on the ports
which are connected to clients.
Yes. In my original post, I tried to be as informative as possible, there's
always something that gets left out. Being a Novell shop (but not much
longer!) we put portfast on all
The two PCs I'm experienting with are using hard-coded IPs, however the
results are the same with a DHCP machine. Portfast is indeed enabled (A
while ago, I learned the hard way about spanning-tree and DHCP/Novell).
Well, and I find myself trying to get more into the Novell process to
My question is - why does it have to be Cisco? If you want edge density,
Cisco doesn't have the best solution. Try a Juniper/Unisphere ERX1440.
Oh whoops - I forgot, I'm not allowed to mention the evil 'J' on this
NG
Chuck wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I found I was mis-typing a MAC address portion of the IPX address. So, I
have a PC in VLAN1 that can't communicate with Novell, but it can send *and*
receive pings with the SPXping utility.
My bad.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47963t=47951
Did you disable spanning tree or used portfast on the ports which are
connected to clients. We have a customer that had the same issue and we
changed the client ports on the 6500's to portfast.
Here is the link.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html
Best regards,
Cisco Breaker
Michael
Michael,
Shot in the dark - I've seen very strange issues like this with trunk
mismatches. You've probably got a trunk between the two switches. Make
sure your native VLANs match, make sure that every VLAN permitted on the
trunk is permitted on both sides. On a similar vein, all trunk ports
Thanks Steve. The slides are very helpful.
Alex
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
Oops, wrong link.
pad
pad
pad
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
Clayton Dukes wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I didn't see
Does anyone have a copy of the slides used at the 2002 CCIE power sessions
at Networkers? If so, is there a link to it? If not, can I get a copy?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47966t=47966
--
FAQ, list archives,
Wes,
Thanks for your reply. As you can imagine I've been through the ringer so
far with this one =)
We checked all of the trunks for native VLAN, speed, duplex, etc... All
checks out. This is also supported by the fact that IP works fine (all IP
routing for VLAN1 is handled by the RSM in
the only reason I lead with Cisco is that I'm just a Cisco jock. When your
only tool is a hammer, all your problems look like nails.
Howard - don't start ;-
Chuck
nrf wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
My question is - why does it have to be Cisco? If you
You have to ask yourself how the voicemail system knows to turn on or off
the light on the phone, and which phone (as opposed to everybody's phone,
which would obviously not be very cool).
Basically, what happens is if you get voicemail, the voicemail system
basically has to contact the PBX (the
hey, if they can afford that many T1's, instead of going to DS3 or frame DS3
( with all the failover protection that could be built in ) then they sure
can afford to pay for Cisco's lack of port density. :-
nrf wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
My question is - why
Sandra Carr wrote:
Does anyone have a copy of the slides used at the 2002 CCIE
power sessions at Networkers? If so, is there a link to it?
If not, can I get a copy?
In case you missed it in the other thread:
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html
Message Posted at:
I've started reading the documentation for the Cat 3550 EMI L3 switch that
will be making its appearance in the CCIE lab in October, and will become
THE L2 device in November.
It does NOT route BGP, according to the docs. Good to know. Does do CEF.
Does do a s**t load of QoS.
In fact, from the
After all is said and done the test was good. Some of the questions were
strangely worded. Those ones I used the gut feeling, close the eyes, click
the mouse approach to answering. Either I did not have many of those or
scored correctly on the ones I did come across.
The course I took really
Hi ,
We are running 3548's with 6509's and had the exact same issue on VTP
Version 2 with authentication. So we just created and deleted dummy test
Vlan's and this seemed to trigger it, I'm still unsure as to why the updates
dont proprgate every 5minutes (apparently thats the default)
Message
I am in need of a quick help.
I am configuring VOIP between two site over the internet. Each site has
it's own PBX and 2620.
The 2620 has HDV module with T1 interface directly connected the PBX via EM
winkstart.
The connection between PBX and Router is fine at both sites.
At site 1, they have
I think the non-wildcard digits on POTS dial peers get stripped before they
are outpulsed. So you might need a 'prefix 79' under the 'dial-peer voice 1
pots' .
Good Luck,
Vance
Firesox wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am in need of a quick help.
I am
Voice Gurus: I'm going to take a stab on this because I just went through
some of this myself (with 2610s but hey same deal)... feel free to point
out my mistakes
If you are doing an EM trunk between the two PBXs (with the VoIP link
acting as the router), then the dialing information
My previous post and this URL are strictly for permanent voip trunks between
PBXs.
Sorry... I meant to include an URL.. One thing I did NOT like about this
example tho, is that they are doing as I mentioned and configured a separate
DS0 group for every DS0 and therefore they end up with
What makes you think it doesnt do BGP? I have one right next to me.. Sure
has hell does bgp
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C3550 Software (C3550-I5Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(8)EA1c, RELEASE
SOFTWARE
(fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 15-Feb-02
60 matches
Mail list logo
