RE: CallManager query to Win2k Active Directory [7:55789]

2002-10-18 Thread Jay Dunn
To be honest, I'm not sure what I'm talking about. However, I've read over the link you provided and this looks like what I need. At least it's a good place to start. Thanks Jay Dunn IPI*GrammTech, Ltd. www.ipi-gt.com Nunquam Facilis Est -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Passed MPLS/VPN exam [7:55863]

2002-10-18 Thread Amin Moustafa
Dear all I have passed the MPLS/VPN exam yesterday ,..going through the Multicast/QoS one. Any recommendations for the preparing materials What is the passing score for that exam??? number of questions? The MPLS's are : 867 and 66 questions regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.

RE: Accessing Work Lab From Home Through PIX [7:55844]

2002-10-18 Thread Jay Dunn
You can accomplish this with a vpn. Go to the cisco web site and do a search on vpn pix. It will return several links with configuration examples. Jay Dunn IPI*GrammTech, Ltd. www.ipi-gt.com Nunquam Facilis Est -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] On

Optical Stuff! [7:55865]

2002-10-18 Thread Jimmy
Hi, I have look up thing on Optical stuffs but i cannot find the explanation of passive optical switch and active optical switch? Can someone explain them to me? If possible, give me the URL! I heard that for passive optical switch - it is O-O-O but for active optical switch - it is O-E-O. How do w

RE: can cable spliter create more switch port? [7:55667]

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Mar 9, 12:16pm, "Andrew Dorsett" wrote: } On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote: } } > } If it was Ethernet, the only way it could have worked is if the second } pair } > } happened to go to another switch port. You can't turn one switch port } into } > } two simply by spli

RE: can cable spliter create more switch port? [7:55667]

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Mar 9, 5:19pm, "s vermill" wrote: } } Consider that the two tx leads physically tie together. So if both stations } were to transmit simultaneously, each would have a comparator that is Consider what could happen if both transmitters decided to drive the line in opposite directions for

RE: CCDA beta exam topic ECNM [7:55829]

2002-10-18 Thread Andy Barkl
Thank you for the response. I thought perhaps I was going crazy (not that I'm not already) because I couldn't find anything. -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 7:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA beta

RE: Native VLAN 1 [7:55743]

2002-10-18 Thread Larry Letterman
yes...which is why a new one comes up as default on vlan 1 as the native vlan for all ports... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Inc. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of > Ken Diliberto > Sent: Thursday, October 17,

RE: NTP server again !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:55836]

2002-10-18 Thread Jens von Bülow
Hi, Try this Enable NTP Time Server (Windows 2000/XP) http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/1117/ This setting is used to enable the local machine to act as a Network Time Protocol (NTP) server. When enabled other machines can synchronise their clocks with this machine. Regards Jens

Re: IDS-Security [7:55780]

2002-10-18 Thread
just a couple of comments. 1) I think you misinterpreted the original poster's comment. You dont have to buy OpenBSD because similar to linux it is free. Like with linux you may want to buy a CD unless you like internet installs :-) 2) Unlike most linux distro's, OpenBSD is pretty much secure a

Re: Router Boot Issue [7:55822]

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Mar 9, 12:13pm, "Lupi, Guy" wrote: } } Ok, I know this is probably a simple issue, but I can't find a resolution. } I have several 2610 routers that show the following when they are loaded: } } Configured I/O Memory Percentage Too Large, using 10%. What this message means is that it is al

RE: IDS-Security [7:55780]

2002-10-18 Thread Elijah Savage III
Snort is very complicated for the average user and sysadmin, especially with the mysql support and that is the only way I recommend running it. But you should look at a product called Demarc the self install script will install every piece of the ids you need snort, mysql, apache with ssl simply ev

Re: IDS-Security [7:55780]

2002-10-18 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
I was looking at A Cisco IDS solution.. Is that not any good? >From: ""Peter Walker : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]," >"@groupstudy.com >Reply-To: ""Peter Walker : [EM

Strange 6509 problems [7:55871]

2002-10-18 Thread Price, Jeffery (TIFPC)
All, I am hoping that you can help shed some light on a problem we had early this morning. We lost power to our data center and when the power came back on our 3 core 6509 switches came back up with out any configs on them. We restored the configs from backups but the real puzzler is why they lo

Re: Strange 6509 problems [7:55871]

2002-10-18 Thread Steven A. Ridder
what is the bootflash setting? ""Price, Jeffery (TIFPC)"" wrote in message news:200210181305.NAA26473@;groupstudy.com... > All, > > I am hoping that you can help shed some light on a problem we had early this > morning. We lost power to our data center and when the power came back on > our 3 co

Re: Native VLAN 1 [7:55743]

2002-10-18 Thread MADMAN
Don't want to beat this to death but if you pull out the redundant sup the primary keeps running the show. After you reinstall the new redundant sup it "should" sync up with the primary, including the native VLAN info. Dave Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > Thanks Larry and the others who resp

Re: Would this break the NDA [7:55799]

2002-10-18 Thread Steven A. Ridder
NO. ""Thomas Crowe"" wrote in message news:200210171509.PAA16135@;groupstudy.com... > I remember a while back I had the question of which terminal emulator is > being used for the CCIE lab. Well after taking the Lab (and yes I was > honored with an invitation to come back and try again one day

RE: Would this break the NDA [7:55799]

2002-10-18 Thread Daren Presbitero
It's HYPERTERMINAL!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Kaminski, Shawn G Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Would this break the NDA [7:55799] No, I don't believe it breaks the NDA. It's not an

Re: Strange 6509 problems [7:55871]

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Mar 10, 7:41am, "Price, Jeffery (TIFPC)" wrote: } } I am hoping that you can help shed some light on a problem we had early this } morning. We lost power to our data center and when the power came back on } our 3 core 6509 switches came back up with out any configs on them. We } restored the

RE: Accessing Work Lab From Home Through PIX [7:55844]

2002-10-18 Thread mike greenberg
OK, I assume that you have an access-server (i.e. Cisco 2509, 2511, 2600 with Async module) so that provide you with console access to other Cisco equipment. Sure, you can accomplish this with VPN. However, if you don't have VPN client software on your laptop (or you do not have either DES (free) o

Re: Native VLAN 1 [7:55743]

2002-10-18 Thread MADMAN
Ok this just didn't jive with my understanding so I went back to the lab and tried something. I have a 6509 with redundant supII's. On the redundant sup I have a trunk to a 3550 and the native VLAN is 64. I pulled out the active SUP, slot1. The redundant sup came active, all is good. I did a

Re: Strange 6509 problems [7:55871]

2002-10-18 Thread Price, Jeffery (TIFPC)
I think I discovered the problem on this one. A while back ( 6months to a year ago) we upgraded the cat os version on one sup engine and not the other so the high availability was not able to work properly due to the different versions and configs on the 2 sup engines. Jeff Jeffery E. Price Senio

Frame Relay Config [7:55879]

2002-10-18 Thread Aaron Ajello
I'm studying for the BCRAN test and have been practicing Frame Relay stuff. I work with a guy who says sometimes FR is configured on a major interface. >From everything I can see, it's done on a subinterface. Below is how I think FR should go: r(config)#int s0 r(config-if)#no ip addr r(config-if

Off Topic - empty CCIE Lab seats! [7:55878]

2002-10-18 Thread The Long and Winding Road
this is the second consecutive morning where I have seen the entire week of November 11 with lots of empty Lab seats. Plus a few on Nov 19th. The next open dates after that are in May 2003 Interesting. Get 'em while they're hot! -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.ph

Remote command question [7:55880]

2002-10-18 Thread Casey, Paul (6822)
Hello, Can someone help me with the following lab requirment. Configure R2 so that, 2 users 'cisco1' and 'cisco2' that are local on R1's ethernet can execute EXEC commands on R2 without connecting to that router. This is a routed network with r1 and r2 back to back. Any help appreciated Kind

Re: Frame Relay Config [7:55879]

2002-10-18 Thread \"\"B.J. Wilson\"\"
You can put the same configuration (ip address and interface-dlci) on the major interface. The physical interface will then default to being a point-to-point link. It would be a waste of interfaces to do this on a hub router, but on a spoke it's fine. Your config would be: > r(config)#int s0 >

Controversial - the value of certain study materials [7:55882]

2002-10-18 Thread The Long and Winding Road
OR - who / what is over rated? I revisited a couple of CCIE Lab preparation books last night. I sat down with high hopes, after a frustrating afternoon at the rack. I was looking for some enlightenment. The first book I hit was one of the so called "CCIE Professional Development" books. The chap

Re: Strange 6509 problems [7:55871]

2002-10-18 Thread MADMAN
I do know that, at one time at least, if you downgrade catOS you will loose most of your config. Dave "Price, Jeffery (TIFPC)" wrote: > > I think I discovered the problem on this one. A while back ( 6months to a > year ago) we upgraded the cat os version on one sup engine and not the other >

SNMP Traps question [7:55884]

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings all... I'm testing snmp traps with a new system at work and I would like to know how to generate some snmp traps (for testing purposes). Is this even possible? Thanks...Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.gro

One link in EtherChannel fail [7:55886]

2002-10-18 Thread Sliver
Hi, I have a question on EtherChannel that is puzzling me.. Let's say we have 2 switches with EtherChannel running between them. There are 4 FastEthernet link inside this EtherChannel (namely link 1,2,3,4). There are 2 workstations at each end of the switch. The traffic flow between this 2 stat

Easy Aironet 350 question [7:55885]

2002-10-18 Thread David j
Hi all: Today is the first day that I can play with an Aironet 350 and I have a very simple question: I want to setup a console password (I'm conected through the console port), is this done using the User Managment window and setting write (or whatever) permissions? (I'm pretty sure that is done

RE: SNMP Traps question [7:55884]

2002-10-18 Thread Michael Greenbaum
What level do you have traps set to on your devices now? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SNMP Traps question [7:55884] Greetings all... I'm te

RE: CCDA beta exam topic ECNM [7:55829]

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Tayler
Is it nit just a 'poshed' up title for the old Access Distribution Core model ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Andy Barkl Sent: 18 October 2002 06:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA beta exam topic ECNM [7:55829] Thank you f

Replacing Loud Fans in Routers [7:55889]

2002-10-18 Thread Michael Gunnels
I have a home lab consisting of 2500's, 2600's, and 3620's. Some of their fans are really loud. I am thinking of replacing them w/ fans that are more quiet. Does anyone have experience with this that can recommend a manufacturer or reseller? Thanks, Mike __

RE: Controversial - the value of certain study materia [7:55882]

2002-10-18 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
The Long and Winding Road wrote: > > OR - who / what is over rated? > > I revisited a couple of CCIE Lab preparation books last night. Are they really lab prep books? They may just be CCIE level because they cover advanced concepts not because they cover the nit-picky weirdness that you might r

Re: One link in EtherChannel fail [7:55886]

2002-10-18 Thread MADMAN
You are correct in that if you loose a link the traffic will be transmitted over another link in the channel. Differant platforms do this differantly but the gist of it is Cisco uses part of the source/destination MAC addresses and performs a hash and the results of this algorithm dictate the link

Re: Strange 6509 problems [7:55871]

2002-10-18 Thread David Vital
Ok, this totally doesn't make sense. if you upgrade the os version on one sup mod(obviously it would have to be the one in blade 1, then the one in blade 2 is going to automatically upgrade as well. that's the whole point in having redundent sup mods. Out of curiosity, what sup mod do you have?

Re: Frame Relay Config [7:55879]

2002-10-18 Thread Matthew Poole
If you did it on the major interface you would only be able to have one DLCI. It's good habit to use subinterfaces, as to add 2nd DLCI you wouldn't first need to remove the DLCI from the major interface thereby disrupting traffic. B.J. Wilson wrote in message news:200210181517.PAA05406@;

6509 and MPLS support [7:55894]

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone provide me with answers to these questions regarding the 6509 (Sup2/MSFC2): How does the OSM module act as far as MPLS is concerned. Does this allow the 6509 to act as a PE/LER or true core LSR? What draft of MPLS is supported: Martini / VKompella? Does the 6509 support IP G

RE: PIX as a DHCP relay agent [7:55785]

2002-10-18 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Ashraf Hozayen wrote: > > Hi, > Use the dhcpd enable command to turn on DHCP daemon on PIX , That doesn't turn it into a DHCP relay agent, though, does it? I think you need a router for that. A DHCP relay agent forwards DHCP broadcasts to a server not on the local LAN. It's accomplished on a rou

ONS 15454 Questions [7:55896]

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ONS 15454 What is the role of the the AIC? Is it required or is it an add-on if we plan on placing this in the field and doing Environmental Monitoring? Will it do anything else for us? Can it participate in an MPLS network? Does it support IP GRE, 802.1p, .q, DiffServ ? How does the DS-3

RE: Controversial - the value of certain study materia [7:55897]

2002-10-18 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 5:41 PM + 10/18/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >The Long and Winding Road wrote: >> >> OR - who / what is over rated? >> >> I revisited a couple of CCIE Lab preparation books last night. > >Are they really lab prep books? They may just be CCIE level because they >cover advanced concepts

Public Internet Access [7:55898]

2002-10-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
I work for a county government. As part of building a new courthouse, I am tasked with providing attorneys in courtrooms with Internet access through my network. Of course, I would like to provide them access to what they need while blocking access to our internal network. My network is setup in

Re: Public Internet Access [7:55898]

2002-10-18 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Not sure I understand how you are running your network, but if you deny the lawyers VLAN from accessing the other VLAN's in your network, you should be all set. That way you only have one deny statement to add to each VLAN. I think what's throwing me is the 300 line access-list statement. There'

Re: Public Internet Access [7:55898]

2002-10-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
First, the 300 line access-list was a bit of an exageration, more to make the point that I don't want an ungodly long access-list. Well, basically every floor in each building has its own /24 subnet. Unfortunately the real problem is that to get to the Internet, traffic must traverse VLAN 1, which

Re: Easy Aironet 350 question [7:55885]

2002-10-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
David, To add a new user, from the home menu go to SETUP (s) then SECURITY (se) and select USER INFORMATION (i). From there you can select ADD NEW USER (add) and fill in the appropriate information for the user. ""David j"" wrote in message news:200210181620.QAA27129@;groupstudy.com... > Hi all:

Re: Public Internet Access [7:55898]

2002-10-18 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I guess policy routing is what I'd recommend, or put a firewall in front of the servers and set up the appropriate controls. Policy routing is what that type of application was inteded for, so you are along the right track, although it's far from secure. If security isn't an issue, then check ou

Re: Public Internet Access [7:55898]

2002-10-18 Thread Shawn Heisey
Robert, Have the VLAN for these users route to a DMZ interface on your PIX rather than the layer 3 switch. Set the security level of that interface to 1 (just higher than the outside). If you don't specify an ACL on that PIX interface, you should be able to use PIX security levels to automatical

RE: DQoS exam - review [7:55603]

2002-10-18 Thread YASSER ALY
No I believe he is speaking about a different exam. For the one you are talking about QoS/Mcast, I just passed it one week ago and I can tell you it was one of the hardest exams I ever had with Cisco. I see it even harder than the MPLS exam - which I managed to pass too -. The problem with this ex

Re: 6509 and MPLS support [7:55894]

2002-10-18 Thread dre
wrote in message news:200210181816.SAA27714@;groupstudy.com... > Can someone provide me with answers to these questions regarding the 6509 > (Sup2/MSFC2): The Sup3/PFC3 may be on the horizon. It will likely support MPLS "better". The Sup2/MSFC2 (well - the SUP2U is generally recommended) can also

firewalls and frame relay [7:55915]

2002-10-18 Thread Garrett Allen
not strictly a study topic - more a design topic. when designing a wan and interconnecting multiple sites via frame relay, does it improve overall security posture to place firewalls between the internal networks at each remote location and the frame routers? my thought is that it would not impro

RE: Frame relay circuit speed from IOS? [7:55908]

2002-10-18 Thread Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)
I do have physical access to the CSU, but I'm specifically trying to find a way to do this remotely. If there really is no other way to do it, I'll have to have someone take a look. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:saridder@;hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 5:24

RE: Frame relay circuit speed from IOS? [7:55908]

2002-10-18 Thread Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)
LOL! That would be Qwest. :) The bad part is that they just reconciled THEIR data with OURS, not more than 6 months ago, so how accurate is that? (No slur intended toward Qwest) Would there be any way to get the circuit speed through debugging? Maybe debug lmi? -Original Message- From: MAD

RE: BSCI Passing Score [7:54990]

2002-10-18 Thread Aaron Laws
I just took and passed the BSCI test this morning. That's a tough test. Passing score is a 700. Hardest part was not knowing what to expect on it. I studied the Routing Certification Guide and the BSCN book. The Cert guide might have been the best thing for the old test with all the theory que

BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918]

2002-10-18 Thread Brian \(273954\)
We are bringing in a second DS3 line into our Cisco 7206 v12 router and was hoping for some general advise. Our current provider is a 9mbps DS3 from Genuity. We are bringing in a seconds DS3 from PAJO at 6mbps for redundancy and to bring the usage down on the Genuity line. My question is what com

Re: BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918]

2002-10-18 Thread dre
""Brian (273954)"" wrote in message news:200210190024.AAA02320@;groupstudy.com... > We are bringing in a second DS3 line into our Cisco 7206 v12 router and was > hoping for some general advise. > Our current provider is a 9mbps DS3 from Genuity. We are bringing in a > seconds DS3 from PAJO at 6mb

RE: Frame relay circuit speed from IOS? [7:55908]

2002-10-18 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote: > > LOL! That would be Qwest. :) The bad part is that they just > reconciled THEIR > data with OURS, not more than 6 months ago, so how accurate is > that? (No > slur intended toward Qwest) Would there be any way to get the > circuit speed > through debugging

Re: BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918]

2002-10-18 Thread Jimmykoz
Brian, Can this be done if the link to the ISP's are located at different Sites? This would be site to site load balance of outbound traffic using ISP #1 at Data Center #1 and ISP #2 at Data Center #2. --- dre wrote: > ""Brian (273954)"" wrote in message > news:200210190024.AAA02320@;groups

Re: Public Internet Access [7:55898]

2002-10-18 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
This seems like an application for wireless. Wireless might be more convenient for the lawyers. Of course, it would have its own issues. It would depend on your building, but perhaps you could connect the wireless access point to a VLAN other than the VLAN that your servers are on, or possibly to

Xmodem Question??? [7:55931]

2002-10-18 Thread jghkskgsjk ghsfghsdfhg
Hi all, I have a question regarding xmodem in Rom Monitor Mode. I downloaded a corrupted image on my Cisco 806 Router and then erased the flash and TFTP'd the new image to it. The install failed and now I'm in Rommon mode. The TFTPDNLD Command wont work so I'm trying to use xmodem, my question is

RE: firewalls and frame relay [7:55915]

2002-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Basically it would depend what ur trying to protect, And from whom. For eg: if i am allowing my customers (extranet) to access my servers i would protect even from my internal ppl besides the extranet. -Original Message- From: Garrett Allen [mailto:garrett.allen@;erols.com] Sent: Saturd