Is anyone using ATT MPLS ( it is also called eVPN or IP-enabled Frame
Relay )network to link offices and also running VoIP ? If so any
problems ? I am looking to link office in India, Mexico New York and
also Boston.
Ryan.
Message Posted at:
Is anyone using ATT MPLS ( it is also called eVPN or IP-enabled Frame
Relay )network to link offices and also running VoIP ? If so any
problems ? I am looking to link office in India, Mexico New York and
also Boston.
Ryan.
Message Posted at:
table-map/bgp/ospf/origin code question. I'm having some trouble
getting it to work. r1 has a loopback 1.1.1.1
and has a network statement in BGP for it, i'm taking the bgp routes,
putting them into ospf and trying to tag them (with origin code) and
then when that route makes it over to r3,
Anyone come across a situation where the ACK number suddenly steps back 1
and the link then resets ?
Host A to Host B is running fine with the app using port 2400 on A talking
to an app on B using ports 3564 3565 are in use. We have several traces
showing the steady increase of sequence numbers
We had an interested situation develop yesterday, about mid morning the
helpdesk manager reported a major problem with the network. Checked the
network with HPOV and some basic stuff on the core switches to check cpu,
peaks, etc. All was fine. Spoke to the NT team and it seems two servers are
Ok you don't say what they host systems are but I am going to guess Unix of
some variety, in which case has anyone been playing around with the
keepalive timers ?
If the session keepalive timer is reached a probe is sent with the ACK
number set to ACK-1 i.e. telling the other end that the
Not having any yet but have heard things. I just want to check with folks
who are using them before we install them.
-ALE
-Original Message-
From: Ken Chipps [mailto:chipps;chipps.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:51 PM
To: Ellis, Andrew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Catalyst
But isn't that what I said 2620 or better?
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Loggins [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Subinterface config. in CAT3550. [7:56174]
This is not true, you can do inter vlan routing with a
Raj,
The following link will tell you enough so you can make it work, if you have
the right router.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Kumar [mailto:pikumar;cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was looking into getting a PIX and had a question. If cdw.com (for
instance) ships one over with an older OS and I want the
current OS loaded
on it what happens if I don't have a CCO support contract. Is
there a grace
period once you buy the product to be able to download the
latest OS
Been running a few 8540CSR's for a couple of years now.
E-mail me off-topic, and we can exchange information.
-Tom
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56197t=56172
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I think your network was probably okay. My guess is there was just a
problem with users getting to shares on the file server, so they screamed
like users always do.
The master browser holds the master list of all available shares - that's
probably simplifying it, but that's how I understand it.
Hi,
We are facing a strange problem with PIX failover. We have two PIX =
525 (OS 6.0.1) in failover configuration. When the standby PIX is =
rebooted for maintenance reasons, it came up and became the Active PIX =
(which should not happen). The active PIX showed stateful failover link =
failed
Hey Tim,
Wouldn't you just set origin IGP in your BGP route map?
At 06:20 AM 10/24/2002 +, Timothy Ouellette wrote:
table-map/bgp/ospf/origin code question. I'm having some trouble
getting it to work. r1 has a loopback 1.1.1.1
and has a network statement in BGP for it, i'm taking the bgp
Whether ATT uses ATM/Frame switches or MPLS shouldn't be noticeable to you
as a consumer. I assume they can provide you with latency budgets and
uptime SLAs?
At 05:51 AM 10/24/2002 +, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
Is anyone using ATT MPLS ( it is also called eVPN or IP-enabled Frame
Relay )network
Hello to all,
Sorry for the off-topic but can anyone suggest a particular brand of modem
that my company should sell to customers for dial-in access to Cisco
routers. We've used USRobotics (various Couriers, Sportsters and 5686s),
Zooms, Bocas, and Conexants. The USRobtics seems to need to be
Without describing the major problem with the network it's hard to
conclude very much, but..a machine becoming the master browser should
not effect much more than the other machines in the workgroup/domain ability
to see other machines on a browse list. The maximum size of a browse list
is
Sure you can bridge between like VLANs and route between differant
VLANs in the same box.
Dave
Jesse Loggins wrote:
Is it possiable to do both transparent bridging and intervlan routing on
this box at the same time? Or is intervlan routing even an option? I am
trying to figure out if I
As an alternative, Radware offers the LinkProof which also allows multiple
ISPs without using BGP. Their box is a more robust ASIC based design rather
than a PC. The same hardware is also used in their FireProof and Web Server
Director (WSD) products.
Vern Stitt
CCNA, ASE, MCSE(4.0 2000)
The 3550 definitely does support ISL trunking.
Ellis, Andrew wrote in message
news:200210241123.LAA30175;groupstudy.com...
Raj,
The following link will tell you enough so you can make it work, if you
have
the right router.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml
-Drew
Does someone know if the IOS release 12.1(3)T support the nested class-map?
I can't enter this configuration command:
class-map silver_ports
match access-group 102
class-map match-any silver
match class-map silver_ports
match destination-address 10.2.5.0
Thanks
Message Posted at:
Hello,
Quick question that I am having trouble locating the answer on.
Basically I need to know whether you can configure PAT to work in
conjunction with a NAT pool on an IOS router. 12.2.x on 2621?
Ex. Nat pool of 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20 Once all nat pool IPs are
taken. Roll to a PAT on
Just a related note. You can convert any number of the top queues in Custom
queueing over to Priority queues. (i.e. you could configure queues 1 - 8 as
priority queues, with the remainder being treated as custom queues only
after queues 1-8 have been serviced). So it's not surprising that there
What kind of service do you want to offer? PBX trunking? Individual FXS
connections?
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56210t=56129
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
My question only pertains to new equipment. For example, lets say I buy a
brand new PIX online. The place I buy from has one in stock thats been
sitting around for a year and they ship me that one. It has an older OS ,
lets say 5.4 with a few significant bugs. What do I do then? I'm basically
left
To those who are interested, Arca Technologies is offering refurb Emutel
simulators (3 ports) for 500 pounds (about $700) with updated software and
six month warranty.
Since I just bought one from ebay I'm stuck, but others may benefit.
Just an FYI to other lab builders out there!!
PJC
Hi,
I am in Networkers in Copenhagen, I attended a session about QoS and in the
presentation they make a reference to
session VVT-201 which is about deploying VPN for SOHO and try to have IP
Telephony thru an IPSEC tunnel.
This presentation doesn't exist here, did some of you got the
Kind of,
ip nat pool NATPOOL 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.20 netmask 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside source list 1 pool NATPOOL
ip access-list 1 permit 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
Where would one go from here to have the NAT pool of 1.10 to 1.20 utilized
and also PAT if every address is used from the pool.
I'm with you, Mr. Sneed. I've even had an email conversation with
someone at Cisco where I detailed why I hate their new site. They have
good intentions and I think once they're completely finished it will be
nice, but at the moment it's hard to navigate. I suggested that they
allow us to
Am I the only one that hates Cisco's new site? I can't find anything that
I'm looking for on the there. Its driving me up the wall.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56236t=56236
--
FAQ, list archives, and
I wish I could turn my high school English teacher loose on the CCNP support
exam.
The writing was worse than dreadful. Has anyone else noticed this?
I passed with plenty to spare, so this is not sour grapes.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56237t=56237
do you mean:
C2620B(config)#ip nat inside source list 1 pool MADMAN overload
Dave
trammer wrote:
Dave,
Can you post an example. Is the syntax different then what I am thinking.
thnx
MADMAN wrote in message
news:200210241606.QAA03297;groupstudy.com...
Use the overload command
Dave,
Can you post an example. Is the syntax different then what I am thinking.
thnx
MADMAN wrote in message
news:200210241606.QAA03297;groupstudy.com...
Use the overload command though unlike the PIX when you overload,
(PAT) on a router it's kinda arbitrary. Some connection will use
The GUI is great for some things but overall I still like the CLI for
general day-to-day changes. The GUI is great for monitoring stats such as
CPU, memory, and etc.
In my experience the failover/HA pix solution is very stable. Depending on
your setup it can be immediate or just quick. If
The keepalive process shouldn't cause ACKs to go backwards. It should cause
them to stay the same. This doesn't sound like a keepalive situation which
should proceed smoothly. This situation involves a RESET which usually
indicates a problem of some sort, although possibly just a minor problem.
I think the problem is that the 4006 is an IOS switch. I haven't worked with
VoIP on a set based switch yet, so I don't know much about configuring
them for this stuff.
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Mellone [mailto:jmellone;speakeasy.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October
Use the overload command though unlike the PIX when you overload,
(PAT) on a router it's kinda arbitrary. Some connection will use NAT
and others will PAT, it does not wait until the last address in the pool
is used before converting to PAT.
Dave
trammer wrote:
Hello,
Quick question
Thats really good to hear. My main concern is that I want the OS to support
PPP over ethernet which I believe is only avaible on newer versions. Anyone
know the exact version that supports this?
wrote in message
news:200210241459.OAA14364;groupstudy.com...
I ran into this recently, but the PIX
I think you've got your config correct, when any of the interfaces go down
on the active PIX it will switch into standby. So when you reboot the
standby it will cause this to happen, the documentation does say you should
use a separate switch for the failover NICs which should prevent this,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We have been working with Cisco on a problem for about a year now
and have determined that we can not get caller name id on our phone
because Bellsouth is sending it in the facility ID field. Cisco call
manager will only look at the display IE
I ran into this recently, but the PIX was running 6.1.
You usually have a standard one year equipment warranty; that should cover
something like that Be really really nice when you open a case. They
usually are willing to help out.
Another great thing about Cisco!!!
-Original
We've been using their mpls service in europe for the past 3 months and it's
been great so far. Only problems have been with the telco's local tails.
Ryan Finnesey wrote in message
news:200210240551.FAA23094;groupstudy.com...
Is anyone using ATT MPLS ( it is also called eVPN or IP-enabled
I'm getting used to finding stuff but I really dislike the small font,
hard to read!!
Dave
sam sneed wrote:
Am I the only one that hates Cisco's new site? I can't find anything that
I'm looking for on the there. Its driving me up the wall.
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Sorry for the late reply. Our e-mail was backup up and I am not going
through over 300 emails from the Groupstudy lists.
We have the Cisco eq. working fine and I am currently trying to get the
Avaya stuff to work. Unfortunately I don't have access to the eq directly,
so I have to work with the on
At 1:29 PM + 10/24/02, Vern Stitt wrote:
As an alternative, Radware offers the LinkProof which also allows multiple
ISPs without using BGP. Their box is a more robust ASIC based design rather
than a PC. The same hardware is also used in their FireProof and Web Server
Director (WSD) products.
I saw jitter in the title, so with respect to voice:
NetIQ Chariot, along with an Avaya product called Expertnet, can measure
MOS, jitter, delay, and packet loss while simulating voice calls (software
installed on PCs simulate IP phones). Chariot is a very expensive product,
and Expertnet isn't a
1. To configure a PIX, is there any GUI interface or need to use Command
Line Interface? If it has GUI interface, is it bundle with a PIX or need
to
purchase separately?
Yes and it comes with the PIX. You'll hate it once you use it.
2. We plan to use 2 PIX for HA solution. Is it stable?
This doesn't really answer your question. But in the past, I've used USR
modems connected to a remote reboot device (like an X10 or similar). When
the modem stopped responding (ie. didnt answer the phone) the rebooter would
pick up and powercycle the device.
Power
I have a client that used to have a pair of them...chucked them about
a year ago. 8540's (at least in the L2/L3 LAN-Switching arena) were an
abortion of a product; it was merely a stop-gap measure to say that
Cisco had a L3 switch on the market. With the 6500-series they've got a
capable product
Hi Pat,
I have got the correct configuration as mentioned in Cisco. I too think
the primary PIX fails as the failover link goes into failed state as the
secondary is down and secondary PIX will become active as the primary is in
failed state.
Has anyone faced this problem ? What is the
Does PIX accept RIP route for Version 5.1?
_
Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN.
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
Message Posted at:
I agree with Mike. If it is brand new out of the box than you can open a
case with TAC and they will be more than glad to help you. If it is refurb
than watch out. Cisco is doing the big crack down on that stuff.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone had any experience in implementing Windows load balancing a
server cluster ? I have always used hardware based load balancers so I
am somewhat new to the MS flavor. I have a 2621 router and I am
wondering if it is capable of the following. This is just some
preliminary information
Hi Jayagiri,
Thanks for your reply to my posting. I am staying at Fremont. In case you
are staying at fremont too, we can study together.
I am looking for a study partner. In case you are interested in a study
partner, lets meet ASAP and see if we can be study partners.
Thanks and regards.
I agree, it is horrible, absolutely horrible.
-Original Message-
From: sam sneed [mailto:vristevski;hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hate cisco's new site? [7:56236]
Am I the only one that hates Cisco's new site? I can't find
Add the command overload:
ip nat inside source list 1 pool NATPOOL overload
but like I mentioned earlier this does not mean IOS will use NAT until
the last address is used, it seems rather arbitrary wheras the PIX will
use all the NAT address before using PAT.
Dave
trammer wrote:
Kind
You are by no means the only one. I'm composing a letter to our SE
detailing the many ways in which the new site hinders both
troubleshooting and fact-finding. Now, it appears to be a lot more
marketing and significantly less technical.
For example, the way they have classified everything into
I have been playing with them all for awhile now (F5, Alteon, Local
Director, Etc.). I finally settled on Alteons products (I like the
hardware based products). Unfortunately, I have a side contract, and
they are concrete on using Windows Load balancing...Wait 'til they see
the licensing on
MADMAN wrote in message
news:200210241322.NAA16403;groupstudy.com...
Sure you can bridge between like VLANs and route between differant
VLANs in the same box.
CL: you can also bridge between unlike vlans and unlike subnets - don't
forget fallback bridging!
Dave
Jesse Loggins wrote:
I haven't seen that any other's posters have had this problem, which makes
me think I may be missing something really basic in the configuration. Any
help is greatly appreciated
I have MPPP configured on two routers' BRI interfaces with the load
threshold set at one, so the second b channel
Is anyone using VoIP Manager Suite to monitor VoIP ?
Ryan,
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56258t=56258
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
Hi Group,
I have some of the voice ports of my 3662 router running on IOS 12.2(10)
hanging and all these E M Ports are currently in EM_PARK state.And we have
asked for cisco TAC to help us,meanwhile i want to know if someone had
similar problem and found some solution for it..
Pls.share your
I used to bitch about the old one and am now totally screwed... I guess I'll
learn to like it ;-(
Tim
sam sneed wrote in message
news:200210241956.TAA01985;groupstudy.com...
Am I the only one that hates Cisco's new site? I can't find anything that
I'm looking for on the there. Its driving me
Hi ,
You may need some basic stuff like
E M voice port modules connected to a PBX at your central site router( you
can have the extensions for the users which depends upon the hardware cards
available on your PBX) and also depends upon the number of voice modules on
the router you will get the
Hi Doug, I've had this problem too. Try this command.
isdn fast-rollover-delay
Something about the router trying to redial the same number because it does
recieve busy signal from switch yet instead of rolling over to next number.
HTH,
Dale
- Original Message -
From: Doug S
To:
65 matches
Mail list logo
