Here's some ideas for serial #:
1. If you have the right CCO access, you can go into online ordering and
pull up a particular PO and view the serial #s online. You might be able to
get your vendor to do this for you if you don't have a direct purchase
account.
2. The serial # is always on the bo
mmend portfast
instead.
Also check your trunks to make sure they all have the same native vlan if
you use dot1q. Crazy things can happen if both sides of a trunk have
different native vlans.
Andrew Cook
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
I sent this to the originator only...
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:52 PM
To: David Tran
Subject: RE: bgp questions
I would say the answer is C. BGP will not send routes learned from internal
peers to other internal
issues.
Andrew Cook
- Original Message -
From: "Roberts, Timothy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:27 PM
Subject: Benefits of two PVC's
>
> I was wondering what all of the benefits of running two PVC's at o
used the BCMSN Cisco Press book
to study and it was quite good.
Andrew Cook
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Santosh Koshy
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Differe
Maybe try copying the file without the .bin extension? Perhaps it is being
identified as a bootable file but will allow you to do it without the
extension.
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Pierre-Alex
> Sent: Sunday, February
marization is not in effect
Routing for Networks:
Routing Information Sources:
Gateway Distance Last Update
Distance: (default is 120)
Regards,
Andrew Cook
"CiScO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<96u9ct$915$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> How do yo
for us, the new flagship switch is less capable than a 5000
series in this respect!
Andrew Cook
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Washington Rico
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 8:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
I know there is no canonical distinction between a bridge and a switch, but
I tend to think of bridges as doing software-based forwarding with few ports
while switches are hardware-based lookups with much greater port density and
speed. Works for me!
Andrew Cook
- Original Message
Most Cisco ethernet ports are half-duplex only, including 2500 series.
There are some ethernet ports that can do full-duplex, like a special port
for the 4000-series. Even the 261x series are half-duplex ethernet.
Andrew Cook
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
I've never used the NM cards you're referring to, so you're probably right.
The built-in ethernets on 261x series are half-duplex only though.
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:55 PM
> T
definitely make the 7513 the ABR.
Andrew Cook
- Original Message -
From: "Hennen, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:32 AM
Subject: OSPF design question re: location of Area Border Router
> Hi, I am preparing
uplex switch port.
>
Wow! I'm going to fire up my 2514 this weekend and try this one just for
kicks.
Andrew Cook
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-to-decimal conversion page! Don't know about the other
tests, though.
Andrew Cook
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Barronton, Ken
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 7:27 AM
> To: 'Nuria Canamares'
> Cc: [EM
I would also suggest logging to an external box. Once the switch reboots
you lose anything it might have told you about problem ports, etc., unless
you have a logging server.
You can use a simple free Unix box or search the archives for NT solutions.
Andrew Cook
- Original Message
even between devices by the same vendor!
Andrew Cook
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Nunie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:26 PM
Subject: HH EE LL PP !!
> We have a wireless Internet distribution. Our radios plug in
its
component agencies - they sure love bandwidth!
Andrew Cook
- Original Message -
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: How would you Explain it.
> >I have a customer who wa
to its outside
interface. You need a route for 10.25.192.0/19 to 155.102.127.26 (if that
is the 6506) on the PIX.
Andrew Cook
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Cabeca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Darren Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nabil Fares"
<[EMAI
is no
need for an actual CIR. It always surprises me that the sales guys don't go
nuts at this because CIR is added revenue for them!
Andrew Cook
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Kenneth
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2
and will show the customer how your
connection performs versus the competition. If you don't need redundancy
then you can do #1 and not worry about any NAT at all.
If you want even more answers, I suggest posting to comp.dcom.sys.cisco -
someone there can probably give you the same or better an
The router would use the IP address of the interface by which the packet
leaves the router unless you choose otherwise.
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Fanglo MA
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 1:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on or copyrights
for the useage of the icons."
I have put them up on a website (excuse the quick HTML) at
http://143.190.10.229/
It is about 700K zipped.
Andrew Cook
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
The first set I posted was in Visio 2000 format - I just added another
link for V5...
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:22 PM
Subject: Updated Cisco Visio Icons
> I recen
-duplex
Andrew Cook
""Bob Chandler"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address dhcp
> ip nat outside
>
> interface Ethernet1
> de
You say that this is a 128K link, but the bandwidth seems to be set at 512K.
You might want to check that as it will affect dynamic routing.
Andrew
""kaushalender"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hi group
> I have strage roblem .The problem is i have a 128 kbps
ic routing. That leaves us the choice of BGP or RIPv2. It all depends
on whether the end user is comfortable using BGP. Almost everyone has set
up RIP before, so it seems to be the catchall.
Andrew Cook
""Chuck"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> well, to contin
, I'd end by suggesting you take it sooner rather than
later. However, I understand that no one wants to drop $1250 unless they
truly feel prepared. If you're lucky enough to be designated as a Cisco
Powered Network, there are supposed to be more opportunities for free labs
in the fut
more flexible.
Unfortunately, I don't have any books to recommend, but I have always been
very satisfied with the Cisco Press books (NOT the exam guides).
Andrew Cook
""Yomi Thomas"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Guys,
> I&#x
Check out dummynet (man dummynet) - I know it comes standard with FreeBSD,
and probably other *nix.
Andrew
""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Mark,
>
> I've used MRTG for years. Unless they have made some serious changes to
it,
> it's still a moni
Well, given your minimum host requirements, this will be difficult.
Location A will need at least 2 subnets, as the need for 160 hosts in one
block can only be met by a /24 or shorter mask and you only have a /24
allocation. If you give Loc. A a /25 and a /27, that would only be
126+30=156 hosts,
The only way I could see this being done with Hybrid code would be to make 9
VLANs: 8 with 1 IP subnet and 1 IPX network, and 1 with 12 IP subnets and 1
IPX network. This doesn't take into account security/political issues
arising from combining the IP networks into one broadcast domain.
Incident
You need to give the customer control of the reverse-lookups which associate
IPs with hostnames, rather than the other way around. If you are trying to
do this on a non-classful boundary, see:
http://www.menandmice.com/ONLINE%20DOCS%20AND%20FAQ/Glossary/Classless.Deleg
ation.htm
If you choose not
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am unable to successfully redistribute BGP into OSPF, although it works
> just fine if I redistribute BGP into EIGRP, for example. The command
takes.
> All the proper switches are there. But no route in OSPF or in the OSPF
Cisco default bridging can only bridge or route a protocol globally. So if
you have ip routing enabled, it cannot be bridged. 'bridge crb' lets you
bridge or route a protocol per bridge group, and 'bridge irb' lets you
bridge and route a protocol bridge group usin
Try this:
!
aaa authentication login PASSTHRU none
!
line 1 16
login authentication PASSTHRU
!
Works for me!
Andrew
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've got a 3640 sitting in an RDC connected to a number of
> sun servers. I'm running TACACS o
ports SRM. It also solves what
has been a sticky problem for me - which MSFC gets control of FlexWAN cards!
Andrew Cook
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> He doesn't need to trunk between switches, this is a single switch
Is this a case where you escape from one router back to the terminal server?
If so, the line is still active - if you do a 'show session' you will see
which hosts are active. If you escape back to the terminal server and want
to return to an active session, just type the number of the session fro
""Xueyan Liu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 701$ matches routes end with 701, such as 1234 701, 234 345 701, etc
> _701$ matches routes end with 701, I would say it's same as 701$
There is a difference between 701$ and _701$. 701$ would match any AS path
that
Better yet, use:
snmp-server chassis-id SERIAL#
Andrew
""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Sort of. You get someone to find and read the serial number to you. You
then
> put it somewhere in the config where it can be retrieved. A banner can be
> us
What tftp server are you using? I have run into the same problem, but only
when I was using an older tftp daemon on a SunOS box. Try running a tftp
server on your machine and directly connecting to the router with a
crossover and see if there is any change.
Andrew Cook
""Andr
40 matches
Mail list logo
