Just a little answer...
yes
(but not a very big one)
--- John Tafasi wrote: Hello Group,
Just a little question. Is AS400 an IBM mainframe computer?
Nokia Game is on again.
Go to http://uk.yahoo.com/nokiagame/ and join the
An alternative method...
If you configure the PRI using a dialer profile for every remote site
and make each Dialer interface the backup route (using floating
statics) or backup-interface for the remote sites you can instruct
the interface to use a maximum of 2 channels.
I'm not going to go
Probably not a lot. You need to have inside and outside interfaces so
the router knows when to translate packets.
Check the NAT section here...
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_c/1cprt2/1cipadr.htm
Follow those instructions there and you can't go wrong
Hi Cisco Lover,
This is the mail that came out of Cisco about this - I hope it
answers your question...
Hello,
My name is Lorne Braddock and I manage Cisco's CCIE program. I wish
to
address any rumors you may have heard about a so
You want ppp authentication chap callin so that the router will
only authenticate incoming ppp connections but not outgoing.
HTH.
Charlie
--- Cisco Lover wrote: Hi Guys...
Any Idea how to setup one sided chap???that is only one router is
sending
challenge??
Thanks for the help..
Charlie,,
Thanks for the help..
So, the rest of the commands will remain the same??I mean we still
have to
put ppp authentication chap and USERNAME+PASSWORD set on both
sides??
Cisco Lover
From: Charlie Hartwell
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cisco Lover , [EMAIL PROTECTED
Well, John Chambers is the CEO of Cisco Systems so I don't think he's
at all bothered about the career of this Tom Chambers you mention.
Speaking of John Chambers - I expect he's quite happy at the moment.
Since Cisco announced a restructure program (the details of which
elude me) the share
You can use this as a guide for your config - just replace the BRI
config with your PRI stuff.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/bri_3640.html
The Digital Modems are designed to accept analogue (PSTN) calls
through the digital ISDN circuit. When a call comes into the ISDN
interface it can see
--- Mahesh wrote: Hi
Can any one tell me the best stuff for VPN,s
thanks and regards
--
Mahesh Chandra
Where do I start?
OK, do you mean training, documentation, case studies, hardware,
software, encryption..
What I'm trying to say is - can you give a bit more detail? Better
than
I might be repeating someone else here - I haven't followed the
thread completely. The vulnerability you are talking about is
documented in this field notice...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cat5k-8021x-vuln-pub.shtml
You have to be VERY careful when putting XP on your Cisco switched
LAN,
Hi Michael,
I am interested in the Optical path but I'm not 100% sure about it
just yet. The certifications area on CCO gives some good links for
reading material for both paths and I believe they are both still in
beta.The blueprint for the Dial CS is due in August.
It is worth noting that the
With the smaller routers (700 up to 3600) you do not get an internal
battery to keep the clock correct when the router reboots. You will
need to use an NTP server for these.
If you have access to the internet then there are plenty of public
domain NTP servers that are free to use (just search in
You need to use a technique called MS-Callback it is documented on
the Cisco website in the access-dial cookbook area. It is also
documented here
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/dial_c/dccalldd.htm#xtocid75233
Sorry about the wrap.
Cheers
Charlie
I expect the total load on your 2 active calls is above 40% so the
router is trying to activate a third channel. Obviously you don't
have 3 channels with a BRI so you get this error message.
Do you have another BRI interface in the same dialer
pool/rotary-group that is not shutdown? If you do
The first call failed because there were no available b-channels at
the remote end (0x82A2).
From this information I cannot see why layer 1 is going down - try
running debug isdn q921 and debug bri to see if that gives any
clues - it is most likely to be a telco problem though.
Cheers
Charlie
It would be interesting to see the document that recommends that
action - after all, WFQ is designed to help with low bandwidth links
without the need for complicated config.
It is more likely that it is recommended to turn off WFQ when using
ppp multilink across the ISDN connection. This is
HSRP is a _router_ function but it is there to add extra
functionality for a LAN.
Also, I seem to remember HSRP being covered in the BCMSN course -
possibly something to do with running multiple instances of HSRP over
different VLANs. Read into that what you will, all I'm saying is that
HSRP is
The config looks fine but we will need a bit more info to help. The
error message isn't much use on it's own, so if you do show isdn
status, then run debug isdn q931, debug isdn q921 and debug
dialer, then try to make a call it should give you more information.
If you have any trouble deciphering
.
regards
Iain Fomes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Hartwell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2001 09:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Still having BRI stress! [7:11653]
The config looks fine but we will need a bit more
Show ISDN status check that you have a TEI number and the Multiple
frame IS
established. If not your ISDN line is knackered.
regards
Iain Fomes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Hartwell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2001 09:39
There is no fault with your ISDN line but there was no interesting
traffic for the router to bring the link up - the 2 messages were for
CDP on the physical interface and a broadcast (probably a routing
protocol). They are not able to activate the link.
You need to ping across to the other side
It depends who you are and who you work for, each CCO login can have
a different profile for access to different areas such as bugsearch
tools, upgrade planners, field notices, online forums, technical
documents, case studies...the list goes on.
Cisco are generally quite nice if you have a
The IS-IS paper by Peter Van Oene at http://www.certificationzone.com
is very good as well. You do need to subscribe to get it but with all
of the other papers, test questions and labs that you get it's well
worth it.
Cheers
Charlie
--- Remmert Veen wrote: Hey Pete,
I've got a collection
In closing... so since I am Unix, (Solaris), experienced and
certified, AND
Microsoft experienced and certified, does this mean I need to run
out and
get some Prozac right quick
I think, maybe, that an overdose of Prozac may have contributed to
the start of this whole argument
In closing... so since I am Unix, (Solaris), experienced and
certified, AND
Microsoft experienced and certified, does this mean I need to run
out and
get some Prozac right quick
I think, maybe, that an overdose of Prozac may have contributed to
the start of this whole argument
PPP callback from a PC client is slightly different, it is generally
called MS-Callback. You can find example configs here:-
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/async_ppp.html
If this is ISDN you should ignore the chat-script stuff, if it is a
modem you, er, shouldn't...
Cheers
With your config you need dialer in-band. The other 2 options are
only used for Dialer Profile configurations.
Cisco have made this command confusing, I always understood that ISDN
circuits had out of band dialers (ie. the D-Channel) but the
dialer in-band command is now used with legacy dialer
Oh man! These ruined dotcom CEO's are even in here scrabbling for
change.
--- Allen May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still ready to stop this
thread and cash in on all the 2 cents
thrown
in.
;)
Allen
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Padjen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
I'm not sure if you have been on the BCMSN course (I hope you have if
you have a copy of the notes!) but that was certainly sufficient for
me. Of all of the CCNP exams, the BCMSN fitted the course notes the
best.
It's difficult when people ask questions like this because we don't
know how much
OK, I think the words "it depends" were written specifically for this
question.
When you go to the Cisco IOS planner page look for images with the
letters "GD" after them. This means General Deployment and you'll
find a lot of ISP's and large corporates use these because they are
considered
OK, you've got a nice combination of ppp-callback, ms-callback, and
ISDN (CLI) callback all combined in that config.
You need to just have ms-callback so remove the "class test" stuff
from the dialer sting and also the "dialer caller 123 callback" line,
then change the "dialer remote-name" to
The only way to do it would be to configure dialer-watch to monitor
a network that does not exist. The only problem is that the link will
never go down afterwards and you'll have a very expensive
leased-line..
I think an important question here is "why?", or "what is the
problem you are trying
Romero Arcas
Dpto. Técnica de Sistemas
CESSER Informática y Organización, S.L.
- Mensaje original -
De: "Charlie Hartwell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: "Timothy Metz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado: miércoles, 28 de febrero de 2001 11:45
Asunto: RE: PLEAS
--- John Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 6,
I wouldn't be so quick to say that. A lot of companies
want/need
the best, i.e. Cisco gear, but their budgets are somewhat tight.
Cisco
support is generally considered to be very good. But, one of the
complaints I frequently hear
That is true and it's always enabled by default. Check the bugs for
fast switching 'cos it has quite a few issues with NAT, ISDN, Frame
Relay (sub-i/f), ISL on Fast Ethernet (sub-if again) and some other
stuff too.
--- "Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if I am not wrong ip
route-cache
As long as that link is OK the LED will stay on.
Now, a quiet word about the NDA When you take these tests Cisco
get a bit upset if you go around repeating the questions - and so do
people who already have CCNP. You clicked an "accept" button before
the test started that had in the
I use a product called Optivity Net-id which is very useful for this
purpose. Go from the http://support.baynetworks.com site for more
info.
Please remember that this newsgroup is primarily dedicated to the
pursuit of Cisco accreditation - your post is a bit outside of the
sort of questions we
It depends how your frame-relay has been configured. It will be the
same command you used to set it in the first place preceded by a
"no".
It is usual to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci ### ietf/cisco"
command to define it but some strange people still configure
frame-relay maps.
Cheers
This is very true - take the trunking off the ports you wish to run
FEC on, you're not connecting to another switch and I'm sure that the
Compaq server isn't much interested in other VLAN traffic.
When you get this going you'll have to set the port channels to "on"
- the compaq cards don't use
Hang on a mo... if you put 12.0(7)T on there you'll lose any Fast
Ethernet interfaces you have. I have found 12.0(7)XK1 to be the most
complete/unbuggy IOS for 3640's.
To be absolutely sure use the beautifully named "hardware - software
compatibility matrix" at
He's the one that went into shock when I told him the nurses
refused to let me have my Palm Pilot. His comment was that if
anyone did that to him, he wasn't sure he could survive.
Hmm, a cardiologist that *likes* his Palm Pilot? That worries me -
he sounds far too comfortable using
You might want to make sure that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is in the "to:"
field and not the "cc:" field - these are dropped to help keep down
the spam levels.
Cheers
Charlie
--- Aaron Prather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: actually, thats
not it :)
i always respond to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
unless i
This of course leaves the way open to get your non-technical HR
person to ask bizarre, embarrasing or just plain impossible
questions.
"So, Mr Berkowitz, could you please explain when a static RIP route
would be useful between autonymous systems?"
"Mr Lammle, when you've wired the left-handed
43 matches
Mail list logo
