Re: Telnet to 2501 through a linksys router [7:62654]

2003-02-09 Thread Santosh Koshy
Here is another obvious, that most people miss out. Do you have a default-gateway pointing back to the linksys?? ""Jason Steig"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Here is my dilema maybe someone can help me. I have a linksys router and > then internaly i have my c

NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Santosh Koshy
All, we have a situation where the users and the nt servers are on different subnets divided by a L3 router that switches / routes information between them. Everything seems to work perfectly fine. The user gets an IP address via DHCP, he can ping and trace everywhere, as well as browse the we

Re: Block Code Red with ACLs [7:14967]

2001-08-05 Thread Santosh Koshy
but does the job for the most part Santosh Koshy ""Geoff Zinderdine"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > There is no method sufficiently granular to stop Code > Red or CodeRed II using ACLs without blocking all > related non-a

Re: Block Code Red with ACLs [7:14967]

2001-08-05 Thread Santosh Koshy
t/software/ios121/121newft/121 limit/121e/121e2/nbar2e.htm Santosh Koshy ""william gannon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How would you block code red with CEF and NBAR? > > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 19:28:10 -0400, Santosh Koshy wrote:

Re: Block Code Red with ACLs [7:14967]

2001-08-05 Thread Santosh Koshy
Depends on your edge router you need a router that supports CEF & NBAR (3600, 7000, e.t.c.) with IOS 12.1(5) T or higher Thanks, Santosh ""Russ Kreigh"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=149

Re: Load Balancing... [7:14865]

2001-08-04 Thread Santosh Koshy
quot; load balancing, but at the cost of a single point of failure (the Router) All suggestions are welcome... Thanks a lot guys, Santosh Koshy ""Peter Van Oene"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Since Howar

Load Balancing... [7:14865]

2001-08-03 Thread Santosh Koshy
Hi All, I have a slight dilemma to which I cannot seem to find a definitive answer.. We have 4 circuits going from Canada to the US... Is it necessary to terminate all the circuits into one router to do "per-packet" load balancing. -- Santosh Koshy WAN Administrator Message

Re: Intermittent connectivity loss - Resolved ?!?! [7:14562]

2001-08-01 Thread Santosh Koshy
What exactly in the NetWare cluster caused it to loose connection... Just for our knowledge.. thx, Santosh ""Don Oxman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks to all who replied. > > The problem seems to be coming from our NetWare 5 cluster, and I think we've >

Re: Intermittent connectivity loss [7:14416]

2001-08-01 Thread Santosh Koshy
This may sound stupid... but have the obvious been checked 1) duplex settings 2) speed settings 3) portfast enabled (only on user ports) ""Don Oxman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I must admit this is my first question posted to the group, though I've been > a

Re: HSRP for a switch [7:14164]

2001-07-30 Thread Santosh Koshy
I'm just trying to understand why you would not be able to do that, with "spanning tree" and 2 identical switches. Santosh Koshy ""Jason Kinney"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I want to protect from a total fail

Re: T1 [7:14054]

2001-07-28 Thread Santosh Koshy
well... > > -- > Michael Damkot > Technical Trainer > Network Support Engineer II > > > > ""Santosh Koshy"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I found the answer > > > > Thanks, > &

Re: T1 [7:14054]

2001-07-28 Thread Santosh Koshy
I found the answer Thanks, ""Santosh Koshy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I keep hearing this all the time, but still have not found a definitive > answer... > can anyone explain the difference between chane

T1 [7:14054]

2001-07-28 Thread Santosh Koshy
I keep hearing this all the time, but still have not found a definitive answer... can anyone explain the difference between chanellized / unchanellized T1. Thanks, -- Santosh Koshy WAN Administrator Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14054&

Re: access lists [7:13928]

2001-07-27 Thread Santosh Koshy
should do the trick. -- Santosh Koshy * WAN Administrator Unilever Canada Inc. ""Joe Morabito"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all internet > traffic w

Re: Memory upgrade [7:14015]

2001-07-27 Thread Santosh Koshy
Hey adrian, Kingston makes RAM for the cisco series of routers, which is a lot more inexpensive... try this site..www.kingston.com Santosh Koshy WAN Administrator ""Adrian Nixon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, >

Re: Cisco 800 IOS CLI [7:1172]

2001-04-18 Thread Santosh Koshy
No... it uses atcual IOS... the 800 series uses a similar box but with IOS support Santosh ""Albert Lu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello group, > > I just have a quick question about the Cisco 800 router's CLI. Is it the > same as the 700 with the SET and C

Re: Check this one out ..... [7:537]

2001-04-13 Thread Santosh Koshy
oh my god thats hilarious :) ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > It makes it easy to have Internet connectivity in the kitchen or bathroom. > Gives a whole new meaning to PPP! ;-) > > Priscilla > > At 07:54 PM 4/13/01, Keyur Lavingia wrote:

Re: A design problem of switched network

2001-03-19 Thread Santosh Koshy
routing protocol(s) they run, their addressing scheme...need > I go on? > > Sounds like you just read the DCN book and are spouting textbook > generalities. > > > - Original Message - > From: Santosh Koshy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco &g

Re: Load Balacing with static routing ?

2001-03-18 Thread Santosh Koshy
Yes you can load balance using static routes. Lets take for example a router that has 1 ethernet int (1.1.1.1) --> to Local LAN 1 serial int (2.2.2.2) --> to WEB 1 serial int (3.3.3.3) --> to WEB in the above scenario if u want to load balance across both the serial links, type in the

Re: A design problem of switched network

2001-03-18 Thread Santosh Koshy
setup your traffic will be load balanced and both subnets will be in use... Hope that helps, Santosh Koshy ""frank"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 992dnf$jd9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:992dnf$jd9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Now I want to design a l

Re: network response time

2001-03-16 Thread Santosh Koshy
You need a packet sniffer whichs timestamps each pakcet. NetXRay will do the job for you. Santosh ""Gayathri"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 98sn9r$b2p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:98sn9r$b2p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi , > > I am trying to monitor network utilization on LAN for a particular >

Re: MAC control on PIX

2001-03-14 Thread Santosh Koshy
How do u filter my MAC address on routers... Please help Santosh "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > I'm wondering if I can put ACL on PIX and only allow > certain MAC addresses to go out? I know I can do this > on routers but

Re: Access list to deny IPSEC on c1600

2001-03-12 Thread Santosh Koshy
Even I was under the impression that IPSEC uses UDP port 500 for transmission. Please correct me if i am wrong... Maybe i am misunderstanding the question... Thanks, Santosh "Damien Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Get you facts straight

Re: CSU+DSU+DTE+DCE+ROUTER=WHAT

2001-03-08 Thread Santosh Koshy
router not using any of this? A.3 Of course you can... But only in a lab scenario. You can attach 2 routers back to back using DCE and DTE cables. The router that has the DCE cable attached to it must provide clocking . L8R, Santosh Koshy ""Shubha Sinha"" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: OT, Fw: SPAM ATTACK

2001-03-08 Thread Santosh Koshy
I'm sure it is I have people trying to sell me vacum cleaners. Some even want me to convert to islam Santosh ""Allen May"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 008b01c0a7ec$91b67c30$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:008b01c0a7ec$91b67c30$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Speaking of SPAM, anyone else in here get

Re: SPAM ATTACK

2001-03-08 Thread Santosh Koshy
Can u post a sample config if possible. Thanks, Santosh ""GNOME"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 988dhu$v4j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:988dhu$v4j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > Cisco router has a feature in CBAC (Content Based Access Control - part of > IOS Firewall Feature Set) that counter

Re: 1603 with 2BRI

2001-03-06 Thread Santosh Koshy
Swapnil, Of course you can. You can use it in so many different ways: 1) use PPP multilink to combine all the B chanells across both the ISDN links, which will give u a total of 256k 2) use dialer profiles and make each B chanell dial a different location which will give each site a total

Re: Telnet question

2001-03-06 Thread Santosh Koshy
use the following line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 15 0 Bye, Santosh "Stuart Laubstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What is the default timeout time for telnet connection a to a cisco router. > And what is the command to extend this time? I

Re: Cat 1201 Switch admin port

2001-03-05 Thread Santosh Koshy
Hi Brian, I remeber going to a BCMSN class and the instructor saying that some of those console cables actually use staright-through cables. I dont know if it will work in your case, but its worth the shot. Santosh Koshy ""Foulks, Brian, CTR"" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Route-map

2001-03-04 Thread Santosh Koshy
Hi Jacek, Did you try the extended ping like I told you too... This will enable you to specify a source and destination IP address before pinging.. This way you can clearly trace which interface; packets generated from a specific subnet will traverse. I am not a 100% sure, but i

Re: Route-map

2001-03-03 Thread Santosh Koshy
he default route statement and that should solve the problem. In any case please tell me how u went about fixing it. Santosh Koshy ""Jacek Malinowski"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 97r3bn$etj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97r3bn$etj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >

Re: Secondary IP addressing

2001-03-02 Thread Santosh Koshy
How are they connected ? ""Roberts, Timothy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I am setting up secondary IPs on two of my serial interfaces. I can ping > both IPs on ROUTER B from the other ROUTER A. The problem is that I cannot > ping the

Re: ISDN B Chanell

2001-03-01 Thread Santosh Koshy
interface use "dialer load-threshold 'load'". A value of 1 for > load brings up the second link instantaneously. Quoted from the Cisco Press > BCRAN book edited by Catherine Paquet p197. There is more detail to this - > so best to check out CCO. > > > -Origin

Re: ISDN B Chanell

2001-03-01 Thread Santosh Koshy
ng the same router on two numbers. I would have thought the NT1 is one number. > > Teunis > Hobart, Tasmania > Australia > > > > On Thursday, March 01, 2001 at 08:37:26 PM, Santosh Koshy wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > I am setting up a simple point

ISDN B Chanell

2001-03-01 Thread Santosh Koshy
Hello All, I am setting up a simple point to point ISDN BRI connection. It works like a charm, but for the life of me, I cannot get the secondary B chanell to come up. When I initiate a ping, it brings up the first B chanell instantaneously, but it wont bring up the secondary. ROUTER 1 i

Re: interesting traffic?

2001-02-25 Thread Santosh Koshy
under the interface (bri or dialer) which dials type the following command "dialer-group 1" then create an access list which permits any ip packet "dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit" that should do the trick and generate interesting traffic Santosh Koshy "beth shriver&q

Re: Full Duplex

2001-02-21 Thread Santosh Koshy
Yes it is "THEORETICALLY" possible but network communications hardly ever work that way... Santosh Koshy ""AndyD"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 9726tq$fj7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9726tq$fj7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > So on a full-duplex 1

Re: Full Duplex

2001-02-21 Thread Santosh Koshy
Hi akshay, If its full duplex you will get 2Mbs of transmit bandwith & 2Mbs of receive traffic... In a half duplex link you will get a total of 2mbs for transmit and receive. hope the above helps, Santosh Koshy ""Network Operations"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: How many VLAN's on a switch

2001-02-19 Thread Santosh Koshy
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Z > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 11:08 PM > To: Santosh Koshy; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: How many VLAN's on a switch > > > You got it...1024 VLANs allow

How many VLAN's on a switch

2001-02-18 Thread Santosh Koshy
24 VLANS on a switch Thanx, Santosh Koshy _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: no domain controller available

2001-02-16 Thread Santosh Koshy
HUH??? please explain... Why would it be spanning tree. technically if i wanted too... i could assign an ip address that is not on my VLAN and attach it to the switch... Of course I will NOT be able to comunicate but that will not affect spanning tree... ""Dost"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Route Summarisation question

2001-02-16 Thread Santosh Koshy
You can summarise them using the following network and mask 10.40.3.0 with a mask of 255.255.255.224 or 10.40.3.0 / 27 Remember this will also include all networks inbetween 10.40.3.0 - 10.40.3.31 "Stuart Laubstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Difference between MLS and RSM

2001-02-14 Thread Santosh Koshy
I am confused as to the difference between RSM and MLS Of what i understand RSM is a router on a blade within a switch. The RSM still routes on a per packet basis wheras MLS routes the first packet and tags the rest for switching if the above is true... which of these is considered L3 Switching

Re: Finished CCNP!

2001-02-14 Thread Santosh Koshy
Congrats John, Your various posts have helped me a lot... ""John Neiberger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message sa8a444c.031@fsutil01">news:sa8a444c.031@fsutil01... > Finally, after much procrastination all last year, I have finished this > darn thing. I took the Switching test last s

Re: Converting from IGRP to EIGRP

2001-02-14 Thread Santosh Koshy
> First, please do not put everything in the same AS. > This is a very bad thing, and I really wish Cisco > would kill the feature. (I think it was placed in > there for marketing) I dont get this robert Please explain the above... _ FAQ, list archives, and

Re: Help User Acess Verification password?????????/

2001-02-13 Thread Santosh Koshy
I have never heared of a default password on these routers... Try just pressing enter when it prompts if that does not work... u will have to boot into rom mode and erase the startup config... Santosh ""Richard Spencer"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 96ah1b$v83$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9

Re: ISDN dialout

2001-02-12 Thread Santosh Koshy
SORRY GUYS My mistake Will make sure to get facts right the next timeand not jump to conclusions ""Santosh Koshy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 967jsi$dit$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:967jsi$dit$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Jim, > >

Re: DHCP not working on new vlan design

2001-02-12 Thread Santosh Koshy
This is exactly what happened to me when i installed my 5509 switch And i am also using win2k for DHCP.. The fix is to enable "portfast" on the switch ports.. Only enable them on the ports that are attached to end stations (not to other bridges, switches or routers) Here is an URL that come

Re: How does one decipher switch back plane numers....

2001-02-11 Thread Santosh Koshy
upgrade to new components. So for example, if a module on a switch gets ruined, you only need to change the module, not the entire switch. ""Santosh Koshy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 9643av$6n4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9643av$6n4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >

Re: ISDN dialout

2001-02-11 Thread Santosh Koshy
The "backup delay command" is only for Backup interfaces... It cannot be used to control a primary links dial settings... ""tv"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 005301c09495$d6bb2200$2501a8c0@phat23">news:005301c09495$d6bb2200$2501a8c0@phat23... > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/prod

Re: ISDN dialout

2001-02-11 Thread Santosh Koshy
; whicever comes first. If you think 50 packets is too low, you can increase it to a max of 100. Hope that helps, Santosh Koshy --- Communications Analyst "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, &

Re: PPP Multilink or Cisco BoD

2001-02-10 Thread Santosh Koshy
The dialer load-threshold feature, works in combination with ppp multilink... What "dialer load-threshold" does is, define the load level that must be exceeded on the first ISDN B channel before the router attempts to bring up a second B channel for a multilink PPP connection. ""Adam Burgess"" <[

How does one decipher switch back plane numers....

2001-02-10 Thread Santosh Koshy
I have seen switches being advertised saying (10gb backplane, 1Gb backplane, e.t.c.) Q) What does this number actually mean? Q) How do they come up with this figue? Q) What do they mean by active backplane and passive backplane and which is better? Thanks, Santosh Koshy

Are Traditional Routing Protocols going to DIE

2001-02-10 Thread Santosh Koshy
ations with an easy IOS upgrade Thanks, Santosh Koshy _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: suggestion required

2001-02-08 Thread Santosh Koshy
I dont know your traffic patterns but all i can say is YIKES.. IP and IPX traffic over a 64k link to add to that u have routing protocol traffic (RIP, EIGRP, e.t.c) CDP if u have enabled it and god knows what else On top of all of this... u are trying to push voice over it.

Re: T1 Link

2001-02-07 Thread Santosh Koshy
tcha, as Leo on TechTalk would say. That's why we have "encapsulation > frame-relay" and "encapsulation ppp," among others. > > Hope that helps a bit. > > Priscilla > > > > >On Wednesday, February 07, 2001 at 06:36:34 PM, Santosh Koshy wrote: >

Re: PAT vs NAT

2001-02-07 Thread Santosh Koshy
NAT like u said is a one to one translation between the external IP and the internal one (at its purest form) When u use NAT overloading u r also using PAT, hence u really cannot compare the twoThey work in cunjunction I personally like to think of PAT as what most people refer to as NAT & I

T1 Link

2001-02-07 Thread Santosh Koshy
Pardon my ignorance here Is there such a thing as just a "T1 Link"... of what I understand T1 / Frac T1 resides in the physical layer Dont u need something at the Data Link Layer (such as Frame Relay) before you can enable IP or IPX at layer 3 _ FAQ,

Re: Merging two companies

2001-02-05 Thread Santosh Koshy
I've never done this myself... But I do not see a reason why you cannot use NAT overloading to do the job 10.10.10.x<--->Real IP<===>Real IP <--> 10.10.10.x Please correct me if I am wrong ""Rodney Jackson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 95nrbr$u2l$[EMAIL

2509 attached to 3com ISDN TA

2001-02-02 Thread Santosh Koshy
has anyone used the "3com ISDN Pro TA" with a cisco 2509 router attahced via async any leads would help thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROT

Re: Tunnel

2001-02-02 Thread Santosh Koshy
You can use GRE (generic routing encapsulation) protocol to create a tunell between two end nodes that are attached to the internet. Then you pipe IP or IPX through it... Tell me if u need the configs... ""N.Anand"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..

Re: BGP Route Filtering

2001-02-02 Thread Santosh Koshy
THANKS EVERYONE. (especially John) The clear command worked... and now i can all the subnets ""Santosh Koshy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 95cqfa$vf6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:95cqfa$vf6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am testing BGP in a lab

Re: BGP Route Filtering

2001-02-02 Thread Santosh Koshy
; > > > > > > > 2) Router B has networks 128.128.1.x, 2.x, 129.129.1.x, 2.x, > > 130.130.1.x > > > > behind it > > > > > > > > Router_A# > > > > router bgp 400 > > > > network

Re: BGP Route Filtering

2001-02-01 Thread Santosh Koshy
bor 1.1.1.2 remote-as 300 > > > > I am just propogating 128.128.x.x across to router A and it works > fine > > > > Router_B# > > Router bgp 300 > > network 155.134.0.0 > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 400 > > > > I am trying to propogate jus

BGP Route Filtering

2001-02-01 Thread Santosh Koshy
... Santosh Koshy Communications Analyst _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BGP Route Filtering

2001-02-01 Thread Santosh Koshy
r Van Oene"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Why don't you post your configs. At least the relevant pieces of them > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > On 2/1/2001 at 5:08