RE: Basic IP CEF question (again) [7:75161]

2003-09-11 Thread Zsombor Papp
Broadcast means everybody receives it. Curious wrote: Hi Zsombor, what do you mean?? Why the router has the broadcast IP in receive mode? I would like to know more about this ;) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75253t=75161

RE: Basic IP CEF question (again) [7:75161]

2003-09-10 Thread Zsombor Papp
Well, the accurate answer is that those are the packets that the router wants to receive (as opposed to switch), but I didn't think that this would be a lot of help. :) You do recognize the common theme across own IP address and broadcast of local net, don't you? Thanks, Zsombor My comments:

RE: ??? Dumb Consultant ??? - Please Help [7:75213]

2003-09-10 Thread Zsombor Papp
Netmasks don't generate traffic, hosts do. :) Thanks, Zsombor Steven Aiello wrote: Hello all, I need some folks with hopefully a CCIE to answer this question. If there is an un subnetted class A, and there are 25 or users on the network. would the fact that the network is

RE: Basic CEF question. [7:74962]

2003-09-08 Thread Zsombor Papp
It means that's the router's own IP address. Thanks, Zsombor Curious wrote: Hello dear friends, I would like to know the meaning of the keyword receive that I can see when I execute a show ip cef command: For example: show ip cef Prefix Next Hop

RE: How can we eliminate the creation of summary r [7:74963]

2003-09-08 Thread Zsombor Papp
no discard-route internal|external Thanks, Zsombor srk wrote: Hi all, Can some one explain, How can we eliminate the creation of summary route pointing to null0 when we summarize IA/other routes in OSPF? Thanks Solomon Message Posted at:

RE: route redistribution [7:74856]

2003-09-05 Thread Zsombor Papp
That description on page 698 sounds like as if there was a thing called router between EIGRP and OSPF. In reality, the redistribution is handled by the (code that belongs to the) receiving protocol. Thanks, Zsombor John Jones wrote: I am studying for CCIE Written and lately have been

RE: ??? Layer 2 routing ??? [7:74788]

2003-09-04 Thread Zsombor Papp
Steven, as Fred and Brian alluded to, some of the Cisco routers use hardware acceleration to speed up the packet switching. I suspect however that your question was a more generic one, so I would suggest that you check this out:

RE: ??? Cisco Express Forwarding ??? [7:74794]

2003-09-04 Thread Zsombor Papp
Just for the sake of clarity: cache in this context doesn't refer to a faster-than-usual memory. The route cache is in the exact same RAM as the routing table. For more details, see the documents Marko mentioned. Thanks, Zsombor Steven Aiello wrote: Another question, in CEF is the whole

RE: OT: Cable Lengths [7:74776]

2003-09-04 Thread Zsombor Papp
The diameter of a 10Mbps Ethernet collision domain is much bigger than 100m (you can calculate it from the smallest allowed frame size, the transmission speed, and the signal propagation speed), so that limit is most definitely not based on collisions. Thanks, Zsombor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: IS-IS [7:74508]

2003-09-04 Thread Zsombor Papp
I think Dom is referring to the adoption process, not the protocol definition/development. IS-IS was defined before OSPF, IMHO. On the other hand, I would be interested to hear why IS-IS was (is?) more scalable. In particular, what are those 3 largish tables and why would OSPF need to scale to

Re: ospf type 5 lsas [7:74699]

2003-09-03 Thread Zsombor Papp
Looks like you have two OSPF processes on the 7500. Typical case of less would be more... :) Thanks, Zsombor Thomas Salmen wrote: someone requested the configs; i'm sorry, i'm not sure who. and the links are numbered, btw. 7500: interface atm 0/1/0.101 ip address 192.168.10.1

RE: Amazing Spanning Tree [7:74594]

2003-09-02 Thread Zsombor Papp
There could be hosts inbetween (think hub). Thanks, Zsombor Curious wrote: Hello friends, I want to thank every answer to this post. I knew that a port with spanning tree in blockin state has not any relation with being down, I was surprised with some answers. What surprised me, is that

RE: IBGP and syn [7:74542]

2003-08-30 Thread Zsombor Papp
What do 'show ip route ' and 'show ip bgp ' show? Thanks, Zsombor kaiser anwar wrote: Hi, I am getting ready to take my lab on my own. I have a practice lab I wanted to know what is the alternate to using the no sync command for ibgp to propagate in igp. My routes are showing

RE: Ping Reply (Packet Filtered) [7:74365]

2003-08-26 Thread Zsombor Papp
'no ip unreachables' Thanks, Zsombor Eric W wrote: All I am still fairly new with ACL's. However I m interested in blocking ICMP to my network behind router A (Interface e0/1 = my network). But when a icmp request is issued from the outside the router replys with packet filtered from

RE: access list question [7:74370]

2003-08-26 Thread Zsombor Papp
I think it's the ICMP type/code. Thanks, Zsombor dave petit wrote: I have an access list (101) on my router that is tied to a cable modem network. The access list contains the following icmp deny statment. It seems to workok. The question is; what the heck does (3/13) mean in the log

Re: FXS Problem - Always getting a busy signal on [7:74294]

2003-08-24 Thread Zsombor Papp
John wrote: Everyone, I have found the solution. It was to do with my phones. If you connect a non US phone to port 0 it wont work :) I might be reading this wrong, but IMHO this document says that port 1 won't work if you connect a US-style phone (or one that looks like

RE: Route Maps [7:74258]

2003-08-23 Thread Zsombor Papp
First interface up will be used. Thanks, Zsombor Lipscombe Tim wrote: Given the following configuration, will traffic be load balannced between Serial 0 and Serial 1, or will Serial 0 be preferred, then Serial 1 Router(conf)#route-map test permit 10 Router(conf-route-map)#set default

RE: GRE Tunnel Recursive Routing Error [7:74035]

2003-08-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
r1 (bb2) learns the route to the destination of the GRE tunnel, 150.50.22.2, via that same GRE tunnel. Add a static route like this to r1's configuration: ip route 150.50.22.2 255.255.255.255 Ethernet0 As a side note, is this (GRE tunnel through the PIX) a good design from the security point of

RE: Matching Exp bits AND DSCP [7:74041]

2003-08-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
class-map match-all? Thanks, Zsombor Muhtari Adanan wrote: Does anyone know if there is mechanism/ way of being able to simultaneouly match on mpls exp bits and DSCP on the input of an interface i.e. AND function rather than OR? Message Posted at:

RE: Quality of service for prioritizing Voice by l [7:74036]

2003-08-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
Policying simply drops (or marks) the excess traffic, so it is not suprising that it didn't trigger the queueing mechanism. Traffic shaping does trigger queueing mechanism if the traffic exceeds the specified amount, but the type of queueing you can use with traffic shaping is limited. I think

RE: hsrp default route in ospf [7:74017]

2003-08-15 Thread Zsombor Papp
Because the HSRP virtual IP address is used only by the directly connected hosts (as a gateway), not by the remote devices that learn the routes via OSPF. Thanks, Zsombor Robert Kimble wrote: Why would that not make sense? Message Posted at:

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
The process with the lower administrative distance will install the prefix into the routing table. If the administrative distances are the same (and they are by default), then the process that comes first will install the route. In other words, it is not deterministic unless you change the default

RE: OSPF DR and BDR elections [7:73504]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
The DR is not chosen from the remaining list. The DR is chosen from the list of routers that declared themselves designated routers (this is why a high-priority router that comes up late won't take over the DR role from an existing DR), or if no router declared itself DR, then the BDR will become

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
So you want to solve a traffic engineering problem with MPLS/TE, huh? How boring... :) Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: I freely admit that I've lost the sense of the problem that actually needs to be solved, with all the discussion of the various tables. Before my brain started to reboot,

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
Jason J wrote: well, in my thoughts, there is no loading balance in ospf. There is, just not between processes. it will choose only one route and put it into its ospf routing table. also i got a case: when there is a route from EBGP peer which is 192.168.0.0/19 and also a route comes

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
thoughts or options on this... Zsombor Papp wrote: Since you say you want to run one OSPF process for each traffic type, I assume the type of the traffic is defined by destination IP address. If this is not correct, then I would be curious to know what a traffic type is and how you

RE: Distribution Router and OSPF [7:73933]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
One concern would be that area 50 will be separated from the rest of the network if any one of R1, R2, or the link between R1-R2 fails. This is not related to R2 being or not being connected to area 0 though. Thanks, Zsombor alaerte Vidali wrote: R1 is a ABR router; it connects to the

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
OSPF process is a per-router thing. You can have two processes on one router talking to a single process on another router (over two separate links), for example. Thanks, Zsombor Jason J wrote: Dear Zsombor: You can't put the same interface into multiple OSPF processes but that doesn't

Re: 3500XL - duplicate IP and Windows NT/2000 ser [7:73868]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
There are duplicate IP addresses, not duplicate MACs. And all the duplicate IP addresses come from the same MAC address, as if a single machine had suddenly all the IP addresses configured on the same interface. I don't see how this can be attributed to a L2 loop. Firesox, what is this phantom

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
What is advertising router and what are those same prefixes? And where does it learn them from? Otherwise it's clear... :) Thanks, Zsombor amer kulaif wrote: hi guys, how about if the advertising router has received an update to one of those same prefixes, how does it know which is

RE: Back to Back Routers [7:73897]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
What kind of fiber connection is coming in on the e0 of the 1601? How are you measuring that 1.6Mbps throughput? Bandwidth command doesn't influence interface speed. Clockrate does, but you have that set to 400 in the config below. That should translate to roughly 4Mbps. It might happen

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
the above routing requirements might be supported. MPLS might work here, but I'm not sure. Suppose you have certain types of traffic that Zsombor Papp wrote: What are you trying to achieve with these ~3 OSPF routing processes? Thanks, Zsombor p b wrote

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
Jason J wrote: Fred is right all routes from different routing protocals will be put into route table ,but!! even if they are the same ! Would be surprising. IMHO one route (meaning a prefix+mask combo) can be installed only by one routing process. Can you post some 'show ip route' output

RE: OSPF summary address with Null 0 [7:73500]

2003-08-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
OSPF installs that summary route pointing to Null0 automatically. Thanks, Zsombor Shab Hanon wrote: Hi everybody The case .. OSPF summary address with Null 0 In all the case studies for CCIE R S we told don't use static routes! . While we need to have a static route to Null 0 with

RE: OSPF DR and BDR elections [7:73504]

2003-08-10 Thread Zsombor Papp
. For a brief moment when the routers are first started, there is no DR, but there is a BDR. I wonder what the logic for that is. -Original Message- From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OSPF DR and BDR

RE: multiple ospf processes route insertion [7:73727]

2003-08-10 Thread Zsombor Papp
I assume you meant R4 not R1 here: Assume that R1 is connected to another cloud of routers and that traffic to networks A, B, and C will originate from this other cloud. And you didn't say what should happen if both the R1-R2-R3-R4 and R1-R7-R6-R5-R4 path are unavailable, so I will assume

RE: c4224 problems [7:73517]

2003-08-09 Thread Zsombor Papp
I have never seen a c4224, but this sounds like the config register is not set properly (see also password recovery). Thanks, Zsombor Robert Kimble wrote: I know these are discontinued and I would do well not to use them, but The company I work for has 3 of them laying around and

Re: OSPF summary address with Null 0 [7:73500]

2003-08-06 Thread Zsombor Papp
Shab Hanon wrote: Can any one tell us how to block a default route? it is easy to block other routes by using ACL with distribution-list But how to remove the default route which is being advertised by default-information originate always command. 'no default-information

RE: ip helper address [7:73533]

2003-08-06 Thread Zsombor Papp
The one closest to the host. Thanks, Zsombor Janik James wrote: Assume that you have a two routers between your host and dhcp server. This means that you have a 4 interfaces you cna put ip helper-address on. On which interface(s) you will put the above command. Message Posted at:

RE: OSPF DR and BDR elections [7:73504]

2003-08-06 Thread Zsombor Papp
the BDR. They will then look for the DR. Since none exist, the BDR will be promoted to DR. Then another election will be held to find a new BDR. Is this correct? -Original Message- From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:01 AM

Re: Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Mul [7:73431]

2003-08-03 Thread Zsombor Papp
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: When you consider interface buffers are allocated to each subinterface Which command displays information about the buffers allocated to the subinterfaces? XXX#sh ip int br | inc Serial Serial4/0 unassigned YES manual up up

RE: H e l p .... [7:73412]

2003-08-03 Thread Zsombor Papp
be opened via Unix editor for windows. And I am looking for that kind of editor. Cheers, Shab. Zsombor Papp wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I often use Notepad for this. What exactly happens when you say you can't open it? Or are you asking how to get the config out

Re: IP services, from case study ... [7:73435]

2003-08-03 Thread Zsombor Papp
Groupstudy wrote: b) service hide-telnet-addresses Wow. This is really a command you can't live without... :) something like that ? There must be at least one other way to hide telnet address..but cant recall Apparently defining a 'busy-message' (probably the second most important command

RE: H e l p .... [7:73412]

2003-08-03 Thread Zsombor Papp
Dom wrote: From our website - Whilst not wishing to get involved in the 'holy war' of which text editor is the best, Dom happens to like UltraEdit- 32 available at http://www.ultraedit.com. This is a comprehensive Text Editor, HEX Editor, HTML Editor and Programmers Editor. Syntax

RE: H e l p .... [7:73412]

2003-08-02 Thread Zsombor Papp
I often use Notepad for this. What exactly happens when you say you can't open it? Or are you asking how to get the config out of the router? Check out the 'copy' commands on the router. Cut-n-paste also works great (in both directions), if your config is not too long. Thanks, Zsombor Shab

Re: Friday Follies #1 [7:73370]

2003-08-01 Thread Zsombor Papp
Then how about this on the gateway (ie. router to which the misconfigured one is connected): ip route 255.255.255.255 interface loopback ip address 255.255.255.255 This still screws up the packets that go through the gateway router and were targeted to one of the two addresses in question,

Re: Friday Follies #1 [7:73370]

2003-08-01 Thread Zsombor Papp
Zsombor Papp wrote: Then how about this on the gateway (ie. router to which the misconfigured one is connected): One more time for those who read it via email: ip route (address of misconfigured router) 255.255.255.255 (interface) interface loopback(n) ip address (gateway used on misc

Re: Friday Follies #1 [7:73370]

2003-08-01 Thread Zsombor Papp
Why do you need the 'ip mobile arp' command? I would think the static route (with the default 'ip proxy-arp', if its a broadcast interface) would provide local connectivity and redistributing the static route into the IGP will provide global connectivity (well, except connectivity to devices that

Re: Friday Follies #1 [7:73370]

2003-08-01 Thread Zsombor Papp
John Neiberger wrote: 'ip mobile arp' is what allows that device to communicate with the local router interface. Without that command you'll never end up with an entry for the errant device in the ARP table of the router. I will if I have a static route pointing to a broadcast interface.

RE: CCIE Lab experience! [7:73263]

2003-07-31 Thread Zsombor Papp
Salvatore De Luca wrote: Well.. I dont know about the rest of you, but when I look at resumes, and I see someone has actually put CCIE written on it. I cant help but chukkle.. If you start something.. might as well finish what you started I say. I dont see the value in someone who is

RE: How to interpret Show Version [7:73078]

2003-07-27 Thread Zsombor Papp
You are right. Thanks, Zsombor Ismail Al-Shelh wrote: Greeting, I want to know if I am right or wrong, Based on the following show version output command I understood that I have 64 MB DRAM and 24 MB FLASH Memory. Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm)

RE: EIGRP Question [7:73068]

2003-07-26 Thread Zsombor Papp
c. is incorrect because 1.) it doesn't overwirte the bandwidth setting, and 2.) the percentage may be lower or higher than 50. b. is the correct answer. Thanks, Zsombor Ramesh Ram wrote: You are configuring EIGRP for NBMA operation. What is the purpose of the ‘IP bandwidth-percent EIGRP’

RE: ios upgrade... [7:72779]

2003-07-24 Thread Zsombor Papp
Hi, are you sure that the image that crashes and the one that then boots up properly is the same one? Isn't it possible that you have two images, and the second one is booted up after the booting of the first failed? A full boot-log would help to answer these questions. If you indeed have two

RE: Equation to calculate the Bandwidth [7:72888]

2003-07-24 Thread Zsombor Papp
For the record, a more accurate formula to calculate utilization of an Ethernet link is this: (160*(number of frames per sec)+8*(number of octets per sec))/10,000,000 The result is a number between 0 and 1; multiply by 100 if you need percentage. The 160*(number of frames per sec) part is

RE: ios upgrade... [7:72779]

2003-07-23 Thread Zsombor Papp
Hi, are you sure that the image that crashes and the one that then boots up properly is the same one? Isn't it possible that you have two images, and the second one is booted up after the booting of the first failed? A full boot-log would help to answer these questions. If you indeed have two

RE: Microsoft VPN through a router [7:72824]

2003-07-23 Thread Zsombor Papp
Steven Aiello wrote: I was wondering what ports I would need to have open for a Microsoft VPN connection on my router. If I have done my home work correctly I think IPSec port: 50 This is protocol number (as in protocol above IP). You will also need 51 I think. L2TP port : 1701 UDP

RE: Command rejected: FastEthernet5/14 not an acce [7:72674]

2003-07-21 Thread Zsombor Papp
Try 'switchport mode access' first. Thanks, Zsombor John Brandis wrote: Hi all, I am wishing to implement port security on my 4006 + supIII using Version 12.1(13)EW1 I tried to enter the command SYD_CORE1(config)#int fastEthernet 5/14 SYD_CORE1(config-if)#switchport port

RE: Bandwidth, QoS, and Contention networks [7:72645]

2003-07-20 Thread Zsombor Papp
I think comparing shared wireless to dedicated wired connections is a bit of an apple vs orange contest. You can get shared wireless where you can't get anything else (e.g. walking from one meeting room to the other, or attending a meeting with 10 other people in a room where there are only 4

Re: Bandwidth, QoS, and Contention networks [7:72645]

2003-07-20 Thread Zsombor Papp
Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorte wrote: after viewing the presentation, you tell me - is this not saying that 5 megabits is more than adequate for voice, video, etc? I don't think that was the point of the presention. Regardless, I can tell you that 5Mbps is enough for voice. :) For video, it

Re: CISCO2950 switch boot issue.. Urgent [7:72612]

2003-07-19 Thread Zsombor Papp
Sounds like the image is corrupted. You might find this page useful: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/corrupt_or_missing_image.html Thanks, Zsombor I upgraded the IOS on the 2950. now when it boots, I get a bad mzip file, unknown zip method. Any ideas?

Re: Help PLEASE FAST [7:72603]

2003-07-19 Thread Zsombor Papp
Hi, what are clients? I'll assume computers in general but if you mean specific software then please specify. What layer are they losing the connectivity at? Can they ping anything? If so, what can and can't they ping? If an affected client can't ping something in the same subnet, then try to

Re: Question in ABR [7:72624]

2003-07-19 Thread Zsombor Papp
This is from RFC2328: Backbone routers A router that has an interface to the backbone area. This includes all routers that interface to more than one area (i.e., area border routers). However, backbone routers do not have to be area border

Re: Fiber Question [7:72544]

2003-07-18 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 03:55 AM 7/18/2003 +, Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter wrote: Zsombor Papp wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 01:20 AM 7/18/2003 +, Bill wrote: Just learning basics of fiber communication. Btw, optical communication is indeed an interesting topic. Does anyone have

Re: Fiber Question [7:72544]

2003-07-18 Thread Zsombor Papp
Annlee Zsombor Papp wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 01:20 AM 7/18/2003 +, Bill wrote: Just learning basics of fiber communication. Btw, optical communication is indeed an interesting topic. Does anyone have a recommendation for a good book on this? I would be very

Re: a really big bug [7:72463]

2003-07-18 Thread Zsombor Papp
Perhaps you slightly misunderstood my attitude and are jumping to conclusions so that you can put a convenient label on me. I am not saying that Cisco should keep security problems a secret, rather that dissemination of information about sensitive issues posing a security threat to many should

Re: Free Cisco IPv4 vulnerability seminar today 7/18 [7:72569]

2003-07-18 Thread Zsombor Papp
Is it possible to get the material presented at this seminar? Thanks, Zsombor At 02:03 PM 7/18/2003 +, Paul Borghese wrote: Hi Everyone, Global Knowledge is offering a free seminar on the new IPv4 DoS vulnerability. I have been allowed to invite the GroupStudy members to the seminar as I

Re: route commands [7:72406]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 11:25 AM 7/17/2003 +, Sasa Milic wrote: This was discussed a milion times; static route that points to an interface has AD=1. Just out of curiosity, does anyone know when this was changed? It used to be 0 for interface static routes, right? However, this is pretty irrelevant as far the

Re: Can Not Router on 3550 [7:72462]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
How do you know it's not working? What does 'show ip route' show on the 3550? Do you have a router (running RIP) attached to this 3550? Can it ping the VLAN interfaces? Do you have any PCs connected to the 3550? Can they ping the VLAN interfaces? Maybe try 'debug ip rip' as well... Thanks,

Re: Multicasting [7:72403]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
Not that this will solve your problem, but why do you need IGMP between two routers? Thanks, Zsombor At 08:22 AM 7/17/2003 +, MR wrote: At the source end , if i observed traffic on tunnel, it was 1.5mb . But at the other end , it was zero.There was no incoming traffic. As i said earlier ,

RE: route commands [7:72406]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 03:07 PM 7/17/2003 +, Daniel Cotts wrote: Answer is Cisco's own training materials. In the BSCN ver 1 materials there is a AD Comparison Chart Connected interface AD=0 Static Route out an interface AD=0 Static Route to a next hop AD=1 etc. The instructor told us that a Static route out an

RE: a really big bug [7:72463]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 04:33 PM 7/17/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: I think Cisco was right not to publish the details about these rare, specially crafted packets, I think so. Along the same lines, you also shouldn't publish it even if you know it. :) but does anyone have the details? Maybe if you can

Re: Need help: debug question [7:72505]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
I would think every decent telnet server is capable of logging the incoming requests. Anyway, comments inline. At 07:38 PM 7/17/2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a strange request: I need to find out who's telnetting to a remote host. I don't have sniffer on the remote site so I'm

Re: Need help: debug question [7:72505]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
I would think every decent telnet server is capable of logging the incoming requests. Anyway, comments inline. At 07:38 PM 7/17/2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a strange request: I need to find out who's telnetting to a remote host. I don't have sniffer on the remote site so I'm

Re: a really big bug [7:72463]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 09:54 PM 7/17/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: It sounds like this is a hypothetical packet and situation that Cisco quality assurance discovered. I thought it was something already being exploited, but it doesn't sound like it. In that case, I guess I support Cisco not telling us more

Re: a really big bug [7:72463]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 10:02 PM 7/17/2003 +, Lance Warner wrote: I've read the ACL section of the advisory again and again thinking I missed something and I for the life of me can't find any reference to a particular type of traffic that should be blocked. It looks likes the regular block traffic from sources you

RE: a default route question.. [7:72211]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
Command depends on routing protocol. You are probably in EIGRP. 'default-information originate' is used with OSPF and ISIS. As we found out recently, newer versions of IOS allow this command under RIP as well, although I have to wonder what that does as RIP advertises the default route without

Re: Fiber Question [7:72544]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 01:20 AM 7/18/2003 +, Bill wrote: Just learning basics of fiber communication. I am not sure about which fiber cable I saw but it was orange FWIW, the MM cables we use are usually orange and the SM cables yellow. Not sure if this is a general rule though... :))) and basically connected

Re: a really big bug [7:72463]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 12:16 AM 7/18/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: By the way, you work at Cisco, right? Are you a good representation of the current employees? No. Only a few of us post on groupstudy. :) Thanks, Zsombor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72545t=72463

Re: Fiber Question [7:72544]

2003-07-17 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 01:20 AM 7/18/2003 +, Bill wrote: Just learning basics of fiber communication. Btw, optical communication is indeed an interesting topic. Does anyone have a recommendation for a good book on this? I would be very interested in a book (let alone web site) that explains the fundamental

RE: Re[3]: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
name is Cisco specific terminology... *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 7/15/2003 at 7:29 AM Zsombor Papp wrote: At 09:48 AM 7/15/2003 +, Karen E Young wrote: KY: According to the RFC (page 99) If the Interface MTU field in the Database Description packet indicates an IP datagram

Re[3]: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
hung in ExStart for x seconds, it would send its first DD packet using the same size received by the adjacent router. Just a thought... HTH, Karen A rose by any other name is Cisco specific terminology... *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 7/15/2003 at 7:29 AM Zsombor Papp wrote

RE: a default route question.. [7:72211]

2003-07-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
I looked at that page in Doyle's book and I thought it's just a simple mistake, or maybe IOS changed since he wrote that, but after reading this: Handling of default routes varies from protocol to protocol. RIP, IGRP, EIGRP and BGP automatically redistribute default routes while OSPF and IS-IS

RE: a default route question.. [7:72211]

2003-07-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
I looked at that page in Doyle's book and I thought it's just a simple mistake, or maybe IOS changed since he wrote that, but after reading this: Handling of default routes varies from protocol to protocol. RIP, IGRP, EIGRP and BGP automatically redistribute default routes while OSPF and IS-IS

RE: a default route question.. [7:72211]

2003-07-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
it with the statement from CertZone, which really meant to cover a different situation. :-) Thanks, Priscilla John Neiberger wrote: Zsombor Papp 7/16/03 3:42:18 PM I looked at that page in Doyle's book and I thought it's just a simple mistake, or maybe IOS changed since he wrote

RE: a default route question.. [7:72211]

2003-07-16 Thread Zsombor Papp
] via 10.0.0.3, 00:00:22, FastEthernet2/0 === End of R2 === Thanks, Zsombor At 12:27 AM 7/17/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Zsombor Papp wrote: At 10:19 PM 7/16/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: To be fair, I just checked, and Doyle didn't say anthing about redistribution

Re[2]: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-15 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 09:48 AM 7/15/2003 +, Karen E Young wrote: KY: According to the RFC (page 99) If the Interface MTU field in the Database Description packet indicates an IP datagram size that is larger than the router can accept on the receiving interface without fragmentation, the Database Description

RE: Fiber ? [7:72260]

2003-07-15 Thread Zsombor Papp
immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fiber ? [7:72260] Why don't you just get multimode GBICs? Thanks, Zsombor At 07:43 PM 7/14/2003 +

Re: switch default gateway question [7:72288]

2003-07-15 Thread Zsombor Papp
If you mean a L2 device when you say switch, then those don't forward packets from the PCs based on default gateway. If this is news to you, then I am a bit worried about the outcome of this renumbering exercise... :) Anyway, I think you need to configure the secondary IP addresses only on the

Re: switch default gateway question [7:72288]

2003-07-15 Thread Zsombor Papp
into dynamic routing. Thanks, Zsombor Thanks Zsombor regards, seun From: Zsombor Papp To: gab S.E jones CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: switch default gateway question [7:72288] Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:01:06 -0700 If you mean a L2 device when you say switch, then those don't forward packets

RE: Standard ACLs and distribute-list [7:72253]

2003-07-15 Thread Zsombor Papp
I think what Tom said is correct. The wildcard bits are just wildcard bits, not a pattern for the prefix to match. I seem to remember that the second (destination) IP address/wildcard in an extended ACL can be used to match the prefix of an advertised route. Thanks, Zsombor At 02:46 PM

RE: switch default gateway question [7:72288]

2003-07-15 Thread Zsombor Papp
, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Zsombor Papp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: switch default gateway question [7:72288] At 05:26 PM 7/15/2003 +0100

Re: CEF Per-packet load sharing [7:72232]

2003-07-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
Hi, you can turn on per-packet load sharing on a per-interface basis. You can also disable CEF on a per-interface basis once it is enabled globally, but you probably don't want to do this. I don't think there is any performance difference between per-flow and per-packet load sharing when using

Re: Fiber ? [7:72260]

2003-07-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
Why don't you just get multimode GBICs? Thanks, Zsombor At 07:43 PM 7/14/2003 +, Schlotterer, Matthew wrote: Hello, I'm currently looking to run multimode 50 micron 1300 nm fiber from building to building. Then once at each building the fiber will be terminated. From the termination

Re: was CEF and per packet load sharing [7:72258]

2003-07-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 06:18 PM 7/14/2003 +, p b wrote: Consider two routers which have 3 GEs between them (no L2 device between them). Is it better to configure each of these GEs as a standalone L3 connection or to combine them GEs into an etherchannel (802.1ae?) bundle? My $0.02 would be to keep them at L3

Re: Automatic cutover between wireless and satellite internet [7:72276]

2003-07-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
Hi, what does cutover mean? In other words, how does the satellite provider determine that you are using the link (I guess it's not traffic as you said it's per minute)? Is it like a dialup connection? What is on the other side of the 802.11b access point? Is there a router there to which

Re: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-12 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 07:54 AM 7/12/2003 +, Hemingway wrote: hebn wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes. how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500 bytes(more than 122 links in one area)? I've browsed through the other responses, and

Re: problem with 7206 router. [7:72177]

2003-07-12 Thread Zsombor Papp
Default solution is to boot up the image on the flash card, format bootflash, and copy a new bootloader image onto it, but you might need just remove a few files from bootflash: so that the bootloader is the first file. What does 'show bootflash:' show? Thanks, Zsombor At 08:23 AM 7/12/2003

Re: spanning trees over the same trunk port [7:72174]

2003-07-12 Thread Zsombor Papp
By depleting shared resources (trunks and CPU cycles). Thanks, Zsombor At 08:02 AM 7/12/2003 +, fdfdfdfd fdfdfdf wrote: how loops in one spanning tree affect other spanning trees? thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72187t=72174

Re: RADIUS [7:72170]

2003-07-12 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 04:50 AM 7/12/2003 +, Chirag Arora wrote: Hello I have two radius servers configured on my AS5400. CAn anyone tell how will the requests go??What i can see the AS5400 sends the requests to first server listed, and if the server does not responds for 3 queries , it sends to the 2nd server.

Re: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-12 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 10:15 PM 7/12/2003 +, Hemingway wrote: Zsombor Papp wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 07:54 AM 7/12/2003 +, Hemingway wrote: hebn wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes. how does cisco router propagate router-lsa

  1   2   >