]
Subject: Re: FW: HSRP question [7:62941]
in the example I gave, from a 7500 router, I believe at the
time isl was the only
vlan sub-interface mode supported. That was why we did
secondary ip's on
the interfaces for the ip phoneselsewhere on the campus
we use aux vlans and vlan interface
comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Vicky Mair
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: HSRP question [7:62941]
Vicky Mair wrote:
> true enoughi can just image in the event of a storm (mc
twork Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: "MADMAN"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: FW: HSRP question [7:62941]
> Vicky Mair wrote:
> > true enoughi can just image in the event of a storm
(mcast, bcast or
> spt
> > loop)
>
> thinking out loud :)
>
>
> regards,
> /vicky
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Larry Letterman
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HSRP
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HSRP question [7:62941]
Issues I have with secondary ip address's :
In the sh ip int br command, the 10.x.x.x secondary on the below interface
does not show up
The dhcp request for that interface will advertise out the primary interface
not the
rman" ; "Cisco groupstudy"
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:01 PM
Subject: RE: HSRP question
> Larry,
> Care to elaborate a little on the downside to doing this? We're doing
> it in our network but I'd love to present some reasons why we shouldn't and
PM
To: MADMAN; CCIE FUN
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HSRP question
I have run hsrp on primary and secondary address's and it
works..
However , I support Dave's thoughts that I dont like to do
it for prduction
networks or for long periods of time...
Larry Letterman
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Namens Simon Watson
Verzonden: maandag 20 januari 2003 11:08
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Token Ring/HSRP Question [7:61359]
Hi Guys I'm going to a client's site that has a 2513 router with
11.3(11a) IOS (image is c2500-ds-l_113-11a.bin). 2 things: I&#x
On Monday 20 January 2003 03:12 pm, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> HSRP has been supported for a long time, even on Token Ring. It was
> supported in 11.3, I think in all varieties, but you would have to check
> for sure in the Release Notes to see if your particular image supports
> it, but I bet
HSRP has been supported for a long time, even on Token Ring. It was
supported in 11.3, I think in all varieties, but you would have to check for
sure in the Release Notes to see if your particular image supports it, but I
bet it does.
You can find documentation for Cisco's older versions of IOS ra
Hi Guys I'm going to a client's site that has a 2513 router with
11.3(11a) IOS (image is c2500-ds-l_113-11a.bin). 2 things: I'm looking
to set up HSRP on the router, should I have any issues with that level of
software ?Also are there an issues I should be aware of when configuring
HSRP on token r
Hi Guys I'm going to a client's site that has a 2513 router with
11.3(11a) IOS (image is c2500-ds-l_113-11a.bin). 2 things: I'm looking
to set up HSRP on the router, should I have any issues with that level of
software ?Also is there an issues I should be aware of when configuring
HSRP on token ri
son" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Glenn Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: HSRP Question - RSM's on 6500's
>Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:35:53 -0600
>
>I have two Catalyst 6500's, each with an RSM in module 15 and mod
Thanks Scott-
This is just what I was looking for.
-Glenn
""Scott Froese"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
96csho$un0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96csho$un0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Glenn-
>
> We have our core configured exactly as you want to do. The following link
> details how to do it:
Hi Glenn-
We have our core configured exactly as you want to do. The following link
details how to do it:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sft_6_1/configgd
/redund.htm
Basically, the redundant supervisors fail over automatically. You need to
enable a "four-way" HSRP
I have two Catalyst 6500's, each with an RSM in module 15 and module 16.
The RSM in module 15 is configured, but the module in 16 is not. The two
Catalyst 6500's have a couple VLAN's which are trunked together with ISL,
and we are doing HSRP between the RSM's in module 15. If one of the
Catalyst
ipguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 11:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: hsrp question..a tough one for me
>
> A question was recently posed:
>
> Two routers-subnet for 12 hosts. Do hsrp.
>
> naturally you assume a subnet for 14 hos
ot; in
lab, and it worked fine. There are probably more solutions, but these were
from the top of my head.
HTH,
Evan
-Original Message-
From: ipguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hsrp question..a tough one for me
this would
also be a good reason why 1 ip cannot be shared.
good luck.
Raul.
>From: ipguru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: ipguru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: hsrp question..a tough one for me
>Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:09:05 -0600
>
>A quest
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hsrp question..a tough one for me
A question was recently posed:
Two routers-subnet for 12 hosts. Do hsrp.
naturally you assume a subnet for 14 hosts, one address each for router
a and b. then don't you need an address for the virtual ip for hsrp.
This only
A question was recently posed:
Two routers-subnet for 12 hosts. Do hsrp.
naturally you assume a subnet for 14 hosts, one address each for router
a and b. then don't you need an address for the virtual ip for hsrp.
This only leaves 11 host addresses available.
My question was, "can you use one
Hello group I have a general question. Is there any potential pitfalls
to watch for when implementing HSRP for redundancy.
Thanks for all imput
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosu
Here is the official answer:
The standby router automatically assumes the role when the active router
fails or is removed from service. This new active router remains the
forwarding router even when the former active router with the higher
priority regains the service in the network.
The former ac
If you have the preempt command on the primary device
-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 6:58 AM
To: 'Doug Laing'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HSRP question
yes
-Original Message-
From: Doug Lai
ssage-
From: Doug Laing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP question
When using HSRP, what happens when the primary gateway goes down, then
back up? Does it become the primary again?
Thanks.
ation under "standby priority, standby preempt".
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "McCallum, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Doug Laing'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:58 AM
Subjec
yes
-Original Message-
From: Doug Laing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2000 12:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP question
When using HSRP, what happens when the primary gateway goes down, then
back up? Does it become the primary again?
Thanks
When using HSRP, what happens when the primary gateway goes down, then
back up? Does it become the primary again?
Thanks.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMA
10, 2000 10:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: HSRP question --help
Dear group,
tomorrow I will take the BCSMN exam.Only 1 question confused me,that
is:
in RSM module,when I configure HSRP as follows:
interface vlan vlannumber
ip address ipaddress subnet_mask
Message-
From: Zhang Jin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 October 2000 06:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP question --help
Dear group,
tomorrow I will take the BCSMN exam.Only 1 question confused me,that
is:
in RSM module,when I configure HSRP as follows:
interface vlan vlannumber
ip
Dear group,
tomorrow I will take the BCSMN exam.Only 1 question confused me,that
is:
in RSM module,when I configure HSRP as follows:
interface vlan vlannumber
ip address ipaddress subnet_mask
standby groupid preempt
standby ip ipaddress
question is whether should I make the vannumber=groupid?
Gate Drive, Suite 240
> Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
> (856) 778-8000 x-13
> (856) 642-2988 FAX
> >
> > It will not work :-)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Mark
> > Sent: Tuesday,
You need the group number.
mms> -Original Message-
mms> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
mms> Mark
mms> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:19 AM
mms> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mms> Subject: HSRP Question
mms>
mms>
mms> When config
is unknown expired
Standby virtual mac address is .0c07.ac00
Now can I finish my lunch?
-Original Message-
From: McMasters, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 1:51 PM
To: 'Tom Thomas'; Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HSRP Question
My inte
Gate Drive, Suite 240
> Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
> (856) 778-8000 x-13
> (856) 642-2988 FAX
> >
> > It will not work :-)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Mark
> > Sent: Tuesday,
work Engineer
Phone:913.859.1986
PCS:913.485.9734
Fax: 913.859.1234
-Original Message-
From: Tom Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 11:44 AM
To: Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HSRP Question
It will not work :-)
-Original Message-
Fr
rk
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: HSRP Question
>
>
> When configuring HSRP, Cisco gives the example of:
>
> interface ethernet 0
> ip address 1.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
> standby 1 ip 1.0.0.4
> standby 1 preempt
> standby 1 p
uesday, June 06, 2000 1:15 PM
To: 'Tom Thomas'; Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HSRP Question
Mark,
This WILL work, but only if you have ONE interface configured for HSRP on
each router. If you are going to have Multiple interfaces configured for
HSRP on one router then you have to have
]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:44 PM
To: Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HSRP Question
It will not work :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP Question
It will not work :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP Question
When configuring HSRP, Cisco gives the example of:
interface ethernet 0
ip address 1.0.0.1
When configuring HSRP, Cisco gives the example of:
interface ethernet 0
ip address 1.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
standby 1 ip 1.0.0.4
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 priority 110
standby authentication microdot
The question is:
If the group number ie; standby "1", is not included such as the following,
what ha
directed-broadcast
> standby 17 priority 200
> standby 17 preempt
> standby 17 ip 10.10.52.65
>
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Mary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 3:02 PM
> To: [
gt; Nick
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Mary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 3:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: HSRP question
>
>
> I have 2 routers . Router B is set up for Hot Standby
> Router A is 2524, Router B i
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Mary Smith wrote:
> I have 2 routers . Router B is set up for Hot Standby
> Router A is 2524, Router B is 2620:
>
> Router A configuration:
> .
> .
> int e0
> ip address 209.49.216.241 255.255.255.248
> standby 1 ip 209.49.216.245
> standby 1 preempt
> standby 1 priority 110
: HSRP question
I have 2 routers . Router B is set up for Hot Standby
Router A is 2524, Router B is 2620:
Router A configuration:
.
.
int e0
ip address 209.49.216.241 255.255.255.248
standby 1 ip 209.49.216.245
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 priority 110
no ip directed-broadcast
!
int s0
ip address
You need a unique address on each router, and another unique address
shared between routers for the standby ip. In total 3 addresses.
It would be a good idea to look at the below documentation before
implementing this configuration. Tracking interfaces or doing
load sharing may be beneficial de
I have 2 routers . Router B is set up for Hot Standby
Router A is 2524, Router B is 2620:
Router A configuration:
.
.
int e0
ip address 209.49.216.241 255.255.255.248
standby 1 ip 209.49.216.245
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 priority 110
no ip directed-broadcast
!
int s0
ip address 206.181.61.66 25
My understanding is that HSRP creates a "Phantom"
router with a Phantom IP address and a Phantom MAC
address (Internetworking Handbook). I'm ok with the IP
address, that is software. My confusion comes from it
being able to make up a MAC address arbitrarily
without stepping on any existing IEEE is
48 matches
Mail list logo
