ssage-
From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Brian McGahan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] [7:74702]
Wow! Given your CCIE number you must be using a REALLY old router for
that
ping. Most newer models send five echo req
Wow! Given your CCIE number you must be using a REALLY old router for that
ping. Most newer models send five echo requests, not three. Either that or
some packets got lost somewhere...
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177
!!!
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-334-8987
Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives,
.!!!
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-334-8987
Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74702&t=74702
---
Thanks all.. Solved all my problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Ping Reply (Packet Filtered) [7:74365]
'no ip unreachables'
Thanks,
Zsombor
Eric W wrote
Eric W wrote:
>
> Priscilla please forgive me for my lack of vocabulary in this
> issue.
> But yes I am try to make the router silent.
>
> Inter e0/0 (Outside) 192.168.1.20/24
> Inter ee0/1 (Inside) 192.168.10.0/24
>
> Ping from outside to (192.168.10.0/24) prod
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Eric W wrote:
> >
> > Priscilla please forgive me for my lack of vocabulary in this
> > issue.
> > But yes I am try to make the router silent.
> >
> > Inter e0/0 (Outside) 192.168.1.20/24
> > Inter ee0/1 (Inside
'no ip unreachables'
Thanks,
Zsombor
Eric W wrote:
>
> All I am still fairly new with ACL's. However I m interested in
> blocking ICMP to my network behind router A (Interface e0/1 = my
> network). But when a icmp request is issued from the outside
> the router
> replys with packet filtered f
Priscilla please forgive me for my lack of vocabulary in this issue.
But yes I am try to make the router silent.
Inter e0/0 (Outside) 192.168.1.20/24
Inter ee0/1 (Inside) 192.168.10.0/24
Ping from outside to (192.168.10.0/24) produces from e0/0(reply from
192.168.1.20 packet filtered). This
Eric W wrote:
>
> All I am still fairly new with ACL's. However I m interested in
> blocking ICMP to my network behind router A (Interface e0/1 = my
> network). But when a icmp request is issued from the outside
> the router
> replys with packet filtered from (interface e0/0 = outside
> network)
All I am still fairly new with ACL's. However I m interested in
blocking ICMP to my network behind router A (Interface e0/1 = my
network). But when a icmp request is issued from the outside the router
replys with packet filtered from (interface e0/0 = outside network) ACL
is applied on in coming
Hitesh,
I'm assuming you're running two separate OS, one for the msfc and one for
the cat switch. On the MSFC if you've enable routing on it, you should be
able to ping all other IPS. However under your CAT OS, this is what you
need to do for your SCO to ping out.
Assign an IP
close, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Hitesh Pathak R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 10:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: can't ping any ip on the network from SC
Dear Group,
I am having a strange issue out here, I have a network running with 2 x 6506
core switches conencted back2back. I can ping all the IPs on my metwork from
the one of the switches MSFC console but not from the SC0 of the same
switch. If I completly shutdown my problematic switch then
gt; Router A has a loopback address address and redundant paths to
> > router F. If I do a ping or traceroute from rA to rF what Ip
> > address will be used to originate this packet? The loopback
> > address or the address of the interface thru wich the packet
> > exits the rou
Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73206&t=73196
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Vital wrote:
>
> This issue came up today during a round table on a real problem
> we were having and no-one seemed to know the answer.
> Router A has a loopback address address and redundant paths to
> router F. If I do a ping or traceroute from rA to rF what Ip
> addre
ition.
Moreover, as long as the FR link is up all traffic should be routed via this
link; this includes the ping to 202.x.y.z.
However, I worked on a setup where I had to test if the backup was working
without bringing down the FR link. In this case the FR link and ISDN had to
use two different net
hi all,
I got one scenario, where we got 2 routers, one is A and another is HQ,
connection between A & HQ are via Frame Relay and ISDN as a backup.
ISDN is using loopback address 202.x.y.z.
Question:
when both Frame Relay and ISDN are up,
how do I create access list in router A to deny pin
You can only ping the internal int on the pix if you are sitting on the
inside. You would also need to issue the command "telnet x.x.x.x inside".
You can never cross an interface to get to another interface on a pix for
the purpose of ping or telnet. You must always use the interface
Can someone help me ?! I do playing around with different configurations
trying to successful ping the internal interface -172.16.200.1 - of a PIX
from an external Router interface.
ip address outside 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.248
ip address inside 172.16.200.1 255.255.255.0
After a lot
Really you have a couple things to worry about, the physical ether link
and the service in question. Assuming the device in question connects to
a managed switch, syslog, snmp, or something similar can tell you when the
port status changes. Re service monitoring, NoCOl used to be a great free
opt
Thanks,
I am looking for a program running under Window or Lunix that could
automatically indicates when a device goes down.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71993&t=71920
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
Are the system UP - without using ping [7:71920]
>
>
> Any recommended free program to check if an equipment is up
> without using
> ping?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71972&t=71920
-
Any recommended free program to check if an equipment is up without using
ping?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71920&t=71920
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/ci
That does sound odd. Are you saying that, without the static
default, in your routing table you have a gateway of last resort but it
doesn;t work unless you statically define it on the MSFC?
Dave
riposi alessandro wrote:
> i have this topology into my POP:
>
> two 6509( with MSFC2) whic
What does traceroute show from the backbone to sc0 in both cases (when it
works and when it doesn't)?
Thanks,
Zsombor
At 02:04 PM 6/25/2003 +, riposi alessandro wrote:
>i have this topology into my POP:
>
>two 6509( with MSFC2) which are connected with two juniper. The default
>route of sc0
i have this topology into my POP:
two 6509( with MSFC2) which are connected with two juniper. The default
route of sc0 is ip_address of MSFC2, while the MSFC2 speaks with juniper
with OSPF process. The juniper originate the default always ad so the MSFC2
receives the default by Ospf (External ty
serial interfaces don't know how to send to each other?? Can he ping
or trace route just between the serial interfaces on the routers? I don't
think he's told us that. Can the routers ping their own serial interfaces?
Probably not.
If the routers can't reach (from a L3 point of
Really interesting . . .
Frederico,
What is the subnet mask in the hosts mentioned ?
Also, do a route print in your host B and post it , please .
Can you try to ping from same troubled router, to another host in network B
, and also to the address 10.60.60.9 ?
A10.61.2.X
serial 172.1.0.0
my network, neither router have routing to wan interface. If i ping from
> any host on lan to any interface WAN of my network, **the hosts don4t
have
> route to interfaces**. But if i ping on ethernet of all routers it
works.
>
> Frederico Madeira
> Coordenador de Suporte
&g
Dave,
In my network, neither router have routing to wan interface. If i ping from
any host on lan to any interface WAN of my network, the hosts don4t have
route to interfaces. But if i ping on ethernet of all routers it works.
Frederico Madeira
Coordenador de Suporte
N. Landim Comircio Ltda
PABX
Frederico Madeira wrote:
>
> Pricilla,
>
> That is my problem. In A side i have a huawei 1602 router and
> in B side
> cisco 2600.
> Huawei don4t have extended ping (i4ve search in pdf and web and
> don4t
> found).
> Hava any other hint elsewhere extended ping ?
00.
> Huawei don4t have extended ping (i4ve search in pdf and web and don4t
> found).
> Hava any other hint elsewhere extended ping ?
>
> Tanks.
>
>
> Frederico Madeira
> Coordenador de Suporte
> N. Landim Comircio Ltda
> PABX: 81. 3497.3029
> e-mai
Pricilla,
That is my problem. In A side i have a huawei 1602 router and in B side
cisco 2600.
Huawei don4t have extended ping (i4ve search in pdf and web and don4t
found).
Hava any other hint elsewhere extended ping ?
Tanks.
Frederico Madeira
Coordenador de Suporte
N. Landim Comircio Ltda
PABX
ck to 172.1.2.1.
Check Host B's routing table and configuration.
That's what MADMAN was getting at. Also, he suggested you try a ping or
traceroute from Router A using Router A's IP address on its Ethernet side.
It will probably work then.
By default the router uses the IP address for
tda
PABX: 81. 3497.3029
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "MADMAN"
To: "Frederico Madeira"
Cc: ;
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Ping Problems [7:70980]
If you can ping host to host from router A's LAN to router B
Hi,
Remember that when you ping from the console the source address will be the
interface where the packet exists. Therefore I suggest you do an extended
ping and specify the source address as the ethernet address. I'm pretty sure
you will see this is the problem.
Cheers,
Message Post
Dave,
My problem isn4t in host. The problem occour in router. When i try to ping
in any host to another lan.
Frederico Madeira
Coordenador de Suporte
N. Landim Comircio Ltda
PABX: 81. 3497.3029
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "MADMAN"
To: "Frederi
If you can ping host to host from router A's LAN to router B's LAN
the routers are working.
Humor me, can you ping the remote LAN on router B from router A
sourcing A's LAN?? If so I stand by my earlier post...
Dave
Frederico Madeira wrote:
> Dave,
>
> My pr
Frederico Madeira wrote:
> Hellow,
>
> i have a problem in conectivity of my two fr networks.
>
> If i ping from any host on LAN1 to any host on LAN2 he works fine, but if i
> ping from router1 to any host on LAN2, dont4t work.
> I understand becouse in two cases the pa
Hellow,
i have a problem in conectivity of my two fr networks.
If i ping from any host on LAN1 to any host on LAN2 he works fine, but if i
ping from router1 to any host on LAN2, dont4t work.
I understand becouse in two cases the packet trought for same router in
NETWORK1. But via LAN he works
so,
>from what I know, the serial link is the only link sending out packets.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Devrim Yener KUCUK
>Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 2:15 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 40% Ping Succ
what kind of circuit is it and is the success rate the same regardless
of the destination address pinged?
- Original Message -
From: Nathan
Date: Sunday, June 8, 2003 7:09 am
Subject: RE: 40% Ping Success [7:70327]
> Well, the only route my router sees is the directly connec
ppp authen
regards
De
- Original Message -
From: "Iwan Hoogendoorn"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330]
> I do not understand what you are meaning with the first option but the
> second op
I do not understand what you are meaning with the first option but the
second option i allready tryed ...
I changed the routernames in the hostname as weel in the dialer map
command...on both routers...
I just dont get it...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70336
or
change the names in dialer-map after changing the router names as well
regards
De
- Original Message -
From: "Iwan Hoogendoorn"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330]
> I am connected to the TS //2
or
change the names in dialer-map after changing the router names as well
regards
De
- Original Message -
From: "Iwan Hoogendoorn"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330]
> I am connected to the TS //2
TECTED] On Behalf Of
Devrim Yener KUCUK
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 2:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 40% Ping Success [7:70327]
please verify where the packets are lost...(which layer...?)
Like any routing issue..2 packets may be sent from one link and 3 may be
from other.. or physical l
I am connected to the TS //2511//
On ports 5 and six I connected 2 ISDN routers //2503//
The routers are called RouterA and Router B
If I rename the routers to R5 and R6 I cant ping them anymore...
If I rename them back again I can ping them...the line comes up and I can
ping them...
Can
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 10:01 AM
Subject: 40% Ping Success [7:70327]
> Ok guys here's an interesting issue. Once we got the internet circuit
> up, the ping was only 40% successful. Why would that be?
>
> Here'
Ok guys here's an interesting issue. Once we got the internet circuit
up, the ping was only 40% successful. Why would that be?
Here's the setup:
3700 -> CSU/DSU -> DMARK -> SBC -> Service Provider.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.p
Hi Peter,
On the onset, it looks like a proxy-arp issue. Can you please inform
me(and double check) all the subnet masks your are using for all interfaces
for all machines (i.e. pix, servers...)
Do you have any layer3 routing enabled on your 3550 ?
If subnet masks look fine, and the 3550 i
same vlan on the same switch
are three Sun Solaris Web Servers.
These web servers can ping and access the default gateway (the ethernet
port on the pix) at 10.209.10.254. The three web
servers are 10.209.10.10 10.209.10.20 and 10.209.10.30. These servers can
ping (and be pinged by!) machines hangi
Xy,
The same problem happened to my 3662 last NOV. It drove me crasy. Then I
tried to replace the SDRAM and found out I got a bad SDRAM.
Let try and I hope it helps.
Good luck,
Tu Do
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66532&t=66472
---
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ping fail at all interfaces! [7:66472]
I have swapped the FastEthernet modules of both routers and still NO
WORK
If I remove the FastEthernet from the TROUBLED router and install it in
another identical model router with identical IOS and both worked just
fine Could be
)
Thank you all
xy
- Original Message -
From: "richard dumoulin"
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Ping fail at all interfaces! [7:66472]
> To me everything seems well configured plus Xy says he has been
> troubleshooting for one month now.
> I
To me everything seems well configured plus Xy says he has been
troubleshooting for one month now.
I would suggest that you upgrade the IOS on this particular router.
Also, does it happens the same if you ping from the other router ?
Regards.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
You can change Ethernet encapsulation if you're using VLANs, i.e. to ISL or
801.1q. You can also change encapsulation if you're using Novell NetWare,
since Novell supports 4 different encpsulations.
But with IP, you can't change the encapsulation. IP is essentially always
Ethernet II, although a r
try to change it to full-duplex.:)
""Xy Hien Le"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not figure out
what's
> the problem?
>
> I can ping out to a connected router (fastethernet or any type of
inte
]
Subject: Ping fail at all interfaces! [7:66472]
I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not figure out
what's the problem?
I can ping out to a connected router (fastethernet or any type of
interfaces) and can only ping the local interface. For example, if I
connect this r
J B wrote:
> Encapsulation by default is ARPA.
> Can this be changed?
Yes, it can (try 'encap ?' in interface config mode), but you don't need
to fiddle with that if you don't *know* you do.
Regards,
Marco.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.co
Encapsulation by default is ARPA.
Can this be changed?
JB
J B wrote:
>
> I wonder about the encapsulation type for the interface?
>
> JB
>
>
> Xy Hien Le wrote:
> >
> > I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not
> > figure out what's
Xy Hien Le wrote:
> 00:28:14: IP: s=1.1.1.2 (local), d=1.1.1.1 (FastEthernet3/0), len 100,
> encapsulation failed
Might this be the problem:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/ping_traceroute.html#addres_pro
What does a 'show ip arp 1.1.1.1' show on the box that has IP address
1.1.1.2 (and vi
I wonder about the encapsulation type for the interface?
JB
Xy Hien Le wrote:
>
> I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not
> figure out what's
> the problem?
>
> I can ping out to a connected router (fastethernet or any type
> of interfaces)
>
Type in ping, press return and follow the on screen prompts. This will allow
you to use ping in extended mode to specify the source address or interface.
Steve Wilson
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Peter P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 11:16
To: [EMAIL
Encapsulation failed appears because of arp failing. Try debug arp and
please could you paste show int f3/0 instead of show ip int fa3/0 ?
Regards.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66478&t=66472
--
FAQ, list archives
I have an issue that took me almost a month and still not figure out what's
the problem?
I can ping out to a connected router (fastethernet or any type of interfaces)
and can only ping the local interface.
For example, if I connect this router FastEthernet F3/0 to another router
FastEtherne
Of course. Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66372&t=66242
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECT
I don't know what an SCPC PAMA VSAT is :-), but on many types of WANs you
need a map statement to your own interface to be able to ping it.
It's true what other people said about the router sending a ping out the
serial interface and letting it bounce back from the other end when you
Peter van Oene wrote:
>
> At 09:58 AM 3/26/2003 +, Larry Letterman wrote:
> >The serial interface cant ping itself like the ethernet
> can..It will send the
> >packet to the remote end and then back..if the path between
> both serial
> >interfaces is not corre
Peter P wrote:
>
> When I traceroute or ping to a remote node from Router A - no
> reply. If so an extended traceroute or ping using the source's
> loopback address - hey presto- all works fine. So how do I get
> the route to use its loopback address as the source - rath
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 4:53 AM
Subject: PING THINGS - THE SEQUEL [7:66242]
When I traceroute or ping to a remote node from Router A - no reply. If so
an extended traceroute or ping using the source's loopback address - hey
presto- all works fine. So how do I get the rou
At 12:55 PM 3/26/2003 +, Peter P wrote:
>I can reach my end node by declaring the loopback address as the source. By
>default the router is using the seril i/f address. Unless I use the loopback
>as the source it dont work. So I need to understand how to fix this - I
>imagine the intervening ho
hi i've check the last 2 suggestions and i feel it should work but if it
doesnt try to shut down the interface and then bring it up then use the
command sh int to see if all is up line protocol and all that
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66262&t=66132
---
The reason it doesn't work is someone somewhere doesn't have a route
to your loopback interface.
Dave
Peter P wrote:
> I can reach my end node by declaring the loopback address as the source. By
> default the router is using the seril i/f address. Unless I use the
loopback
> as the source it
When I traceroute or ping to a remote node from Router A - no reply. If so
an extended traceroute or ping using the source's loopback address - hey
presto- all works fine. So how do I get the route to use its loopback
address as the source - rather than the serial interface. Or cant I change
Type in ping, press return and follow the on screen prompts. This will allow
you to use ping in extended mode to specify the source address or interface.
Steve Wilson
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Peter P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 11:16
To: [EMAIL
At 09:58 AM 3/26/2003 +, Larry Letterman wrote:
>The serial interface cant ping itself like the ethernet can..It will send
the
>packet to the remote end and then back..if the path between both serial
>interfaces is not correct the local ping will
>fail..turn off keepalives and see
I can reach my end node by declaring the loopback address as the source. By
default the router is using the seril i/f address. Unless I use the loopback
as the source it dont work. So I need to understand how to fix this - I
imagine the intervening hops are where the trouble lies
Message Posted a
OK If I use the loopback addr then I can see ext trace going right way.
Now I need to make the rtr use this addr as the source
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66237&t=66155
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription inf
The serial interface cant ping itself like the ethernet can..It will send the
packet to the remote end and then back..if the path between both serial
interfaces is not correct the local ping will
fail..turn off keepalives and see if the ping will work on the local end..
Larry Letterman
Network
: srinivas kunthuri ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: PING PROBLEM [7:66132]
to ping the serial interface usually it has to go to the remote end and
then
back...make sure the path from end to end is working...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco
At 04:35 PM 3/25/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote:
> >
> > You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables
> > thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks.
> >
> > The reason you'
do a traceroute from F to A and see what it says and email it to
this list...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: Peter P
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:55 AM
Subject: ping things [7:66155]
I can ping from router
At 04:35 PM 3/25/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote:
> >
> > You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables
> > thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks.
> >
> > The reason you'
At 02:55 PM 3/25/2003 +, Peter P wrote:
>I can ping from router A through various hops to router F.
>Therefore the packet'knows' how to reach F - and also how to find a path
>back to A by reply. However from router F I cannot ping router A.
>As the ping works in the fi
Several thoughts:
A standard ping uses as its source address the address of the exit
interface.
Extended ping can use the address of any interface on that router.
Do a trace to see where it fails.
Check the routing tables of the various routers.
Somewhere a route is missing.
For example - suppose
You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables thouroughly. I'm sure
you're missing some networks.
The reason you're able to ping one-way is because you're using different
sets of source and destination IP addresses when pinging from router A to
router F, as compared to
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote:
>
> You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables
> thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks.
>
> The reason you're able to ping one-way is because you're using
> different sets of source and destin
I can ping from router A through various hops to router F.
Therefore the packet'knows' how to reach F - and also how to find a path
back to A by reply. However from router F I cannot ping router A.
As the ping works in the first case - ie it knows the path back from F to A
- how come
Hi all
I am having one doubt regarding ping. I had configured two routers at two
locations connected through SCPC PAMA VSATs.
I had pinged to serial interface. It has given request timed out. but, the
serial interface is up and line protocol is also up.
I had pinged the other end serial ip. it is
local director is having problems? Has anybody here has
a similar problem before?
When I ping from the servers sharing the subnet of the load balancer virtual
address I get the same reply to both address <10ms.
Thanks,
Silvia
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=
hey, BT, can you contact me off line please. I have a question regarding the
firmware versions.
thanks.
chuck
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Biff Terrific"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I used to have those problems only with basic-ni; I upgraded the
sisco wrote:
>
> gurus, :)
> Is ping/icmp protocol needs to be prioritized on Lan
> environment just
> to have a good latency ping result? is it ping a good basis for
> measuring
> your
> network if it is congested? Thanks!
Ping can help you understand if a network is
Is ping/icmp protocol needs to be prioritized on Lan environment just
to have a good latency ping result? is it ping a good basis for measuring
your
network if it is congested? Thanks!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63934&
.2.2.2/24.The
> middle router running rip has networks 10 and netw 120 defined.I cannot
> ping 10.9.9.9 or 10.8.8.8 from the rip routerWithout configuring static
> routes, how can I ping these networks?Thank you for your help.Sincerely,CN
> Config. on the middle router running both rip a
please send the rest of the config so we can have a look.
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 16:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot ping ospf routes from a rip router? [7:63864]
Hello, I have 3 routers setup, running ospf and rip
Hello, I have 3 routers setup, running ospf and rip ver 1 with 2 way
redistribution on the middle router.The ospf routers have loopbacks as
10.8.8.8/24 and 10.9.9.9/24The rip router has a loopback of 10.2.2.2/24.The
middle router running rip has networks 10 and netw 120 defined.I cannot
ping
hello all
I have cisco router,router A with multiple WAN links
connected to it. on this LAN we have checkpoint f/w
having default route pointing to internet router .
The default route on router A points to ethernet ip
add of f/w. However I cannot ping from router
tofirewall (the ethernet of f/w
1 - 100 of 815 matches
Mail list logo
