http://www.galton.com/~cisco
-chris
Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
2019FB428FD3D311893700508B71EBFB191B08@RWR_MAIL_SVR">news:2019FB428FD3D311893700508B71EBFB191B08@RWR_MAIL_SVR...
> > As with Microsoft, I think that one of the hardest things about Cisco is
> > to find s
Log into http://www.galton.com/~cisco/ and hit the button to Get Logo.
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 1:23 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: CCNA badge
> As with Microsoft, I think that one of the hardest things about
Depends on the default of the IOS version your being tested on.
Viet Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Good afternoon,
>
> >2) If they don't say differently in the question that
> you read very
> >carefully, then the assumption is that you c
Ok, maybe I'm a ditz. I've been telling people that when you are preparing
for a test you are expected to understand the default behavior of the IOS
version you are being tested on. If the question does not specify a
different configuration from the default, then assume the default. Sometimes
the
doesn't 12.0 default to classless?
> I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip
> classless," we should assume classful. It'd be nice if I were wrong...
>
> - Don
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: We
I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip
classless," we should assume classful. It'd be nice if I were wrong...
- Don
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
Don't you just love the new exam outline? Looks like they gave up the sushi
at those meetings and just went with the tequila... [=`)
Dale
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: CCNA 2.0: Classful or
Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:57 PM
> To: Constance Cate; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CCNA and subnetting questions
>
>
>
> I forget the use of the ip subnet zero command? Can you clarify?
> Thanks.
>
> >From: "Cate, Constance" <[EMAIL PR
Niraj Palikhey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:57 PM
To: Constance Cate; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCNA and subnetting questions
I forget the use of the ip subnet zero command? Can you clarify?
Thanks.
>From: "Cate, Constance" <
Good afternoon,
>2) If they don't say differently in the question that
you read very
>carefully, then the assumption is that you cannot
use the "zero
>subnets."
I am in my last week rounding up all I have learned
the past 4 months, and will take CCNA 2.0 exam next
week.
If CCNA 640-507 Certifi
I forget the use of the ip subnet zero command? Can you clarify?
Thanks.
>From: "Cate, Constance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Cate, Constance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Seth Wilson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>"
1) Read the question, they will tell you what they want you to know; they
just don't say it very clearly sometimes. Just like the real world where you
have to go plowing through the s&*^ to get to the info you need.
2) If they don't say differently in the question that you read very
carefully, th
Relax. Take your time. Don't watch the clock. Trust yourself. Pass.
Dale
[=`)
>From: Lance Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Lance Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: CCNA 640-507
>Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 12:47:32 -0700
>
>CCNA 640-507 tomorrow
Check out the "Interconnecting Cisco Network Devices" book from Cisco
Press. It looks very good. It's based on the course, which the CCNA 2.0
test is also based on presumably.
Priscilla
At 09:03 AM 5/31/2000 +0400, Namal Perera wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am new to CISCO and I was planning to sit for the
Moving to CCNP 2.0 should not be a big problem.. may require a tiny bit of
reading before taking a new course, but nothing too major. Cisco does
support, and allow this scenario.
As for disadvantages, is the possibility of rewriting sooner than if you
took the CCNA 2.0 exam, though nobody really
Hi.
why not go for 2.0?
I think CCNA test isn't too difficult to get pass.
Anyway, cisco still didn't announce when will 1.0 expire.
but it will retire at the end of next month.
BB
""Jaffery, Masood"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
14841E0FA7E1D31187CB00805F19FC1101CBA8@NDHS0013">news:1484
If you study hard and practice, you can pass the test.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Hairbottle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCNA
Hi All
I am planning on doing my CCNA 2.0. The new exam 640-507 is out. Cisco
recommends th
Don't worry about it. The 2.0 exam was easy I passed it Friday while only
studying for 2 weeks. There is a lot less subnetting then 1.0 and more lan
technologies (ie. vlan, trunking, etc...). I got a 946.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O
If you study really really hard and learn all the objectives that Cisco has
yet to post on the web site.
640-407 is listed at
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/ccna_407
.pdf
Good Luck
Jeff
"Brett Hairbottle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
00f801bfc9ad$5
I took the CCNA 1.0 with Cisco books (not the course book, though) and net
resources and passed with 925. So, it's possible. It does help A LOT though,
if you have experience with routers (I do), then you only need to study your
weak areas, and the concepts make a lot more sense. This newsgroup is
Todd Lammle's book for the CCNA is excellent. There were a few details I
saw on practice exams that weren't mentioned (FECNs and BECNs for Frame
Relay), but other than that, it was a great book for learning 95% of what
the CCNA exams cover.
The virtual lab, on the other hand, wasn't "all that".
the above
subjects
> and you should be ok. I also have experience but the guides should be
> sufficient.
>
> Good luck and get experience so Cisco certs aren't watered down.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
cient.
Good luck and get experience so Cisco certs aren't watered down.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ted Nugent
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0
Thanks Ben,
I'
Thanks Ben,
I'll check it out
""Benjamin Walling"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> I sat the new course, ICND, and took the old test. There were things like
VLANs
> and switching in the course that were not on the 1.0 test or in the 1
I sat the new course, ICND, and took the old test. There were things like VLANs
and switching in the course that were not on the 1.0 test or in the 1.0 prep
material. I think that Cisco has the requirements for each up on the web site.
Ben
___
UPDATED Posting
c.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~
> -Original Message-
> From: McMasters, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 8:05 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: CCNA!!
>
>
> I agree with Brad. I work with two Unix guys that passed the
>
I do not know if his new book is out yet, so I will assume that you are
talking about the one for the 640-407 exam (CCNA 1.0).
If you are planning on taking the CCNA 1.0 exam, it should cover 100%, but
if you are planning on taking the CCNA 2.0 exam, you will need some
additional reading. I can s
t you won't be left in the dark. Just my .02 cents!
Eric L. McMasters, CCNA/CCDA
OSSN - Sr. Network Engineer
Phone:913.859.1986
PCS:913.485.9734
Fax: 913.859.1234
-Original Message-
From: Brad Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 6:14 PM
Whenever you're ready.
It has been out (at least in the US) since the beginning of the month.
Good luck,
Ole
~
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
RWR Enterprises, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~
> -Original Message
Congragulations! Are you going to be working for Cisco now ?
Bharat Suneja
""Vineet Bhojnagarwala"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
011401bfc702$bf1d6560$d6befea9@main">news:011401bfc702$bf1d6560$d6befea9@main...
ccna certified with the score of 944.
Just wanted to say thanks to all the m
no no and no
hell no
no no no no no no
Get my point? A co-worker just passed the test today using some practice
tests and a few study notes..I dont think he's ever even touched a router.
-brad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I bought Todd La
gt;
> > After for his CCIE# next time, and might be he will tell you some better
> > jokes. Then don't forget to share with us.
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > >From: Kevin Mahler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: Kevin Mahler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
>
> >From: Kevin Mahler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Kevin Mahler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Fwd: Re: CCNA worthless?
> >Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 08:57:00 -0400
> >
> >Whoops. I meant to post this to the group.
> &g
ubject: RE: CCNA worthless?
Oh, I am sure a company would pay you more or hire you faster if you CCIE
and NT/2000. Somehow, I think UNIX would be the choice here. Not for the
$$ but for the love of a fine operating system. And the elegance that UNIX
brings to the OS
Whoops. I meant to post this to the group.
Kevin
>Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 15:24:55 -0400
>To: "paul doyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Kevin Mahler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: CCNA worthless?
>
>Did you see his Cert? I have seen lots of people say
HERE YE HERE YE!!!
unix forever :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sam Adams
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCNA worthless?
Oh, I am sure a company would pay you more or hire you faster if you
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
JohnMail
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 10:34 AM
To: Brian Lodwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCNA worthless?
Brian:
I still think that you should stay with NT/2000. Its installation base is
far too large to
> > JohnMail
> > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 10:34 AM
> > To: Brian Lodwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: CCNA worthless?
> >
> >
> > Brian:
> >
> > I still think that you should stay with NT/2000. Its installat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> JohnMail
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 10:34 AM
> To: Brian Lodwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CCNA worthless?
>
>
> Brian:
>
> I still think that you should stay with NT/2000. Its instal
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 6:59 PM
Subject: RE: CCNA worthless?
>
> I keep telling myself that knowledge and experience will get me the job I
> want as I work here and troubleshoot problems everyday for everyone. I
want
> to be configuring routers making crazy cool batch
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: CCNA worthless?
>Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 12:23:05 EDT
>
>Just a curious note- I haven't ever seen a CCNP boot camp. I wonder if
>anyone claims to be able to prepare you for CCNP real fast like the CCNA
>and
>
ans out in the long
run.
>>>Brian
>From: "Kevin Welch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Kevin Welch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "paul doyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: CCNA worthless?
>Date: Fri,
I would have to say it depends on the person. If you want nothing more than
a piece of paper certification out of training then thats all you will get.
The cert may get you the interview, your knowledge and exerpience will get
you the job and pay you want.
-- Kevin
> -Original Message-
Just a curious note- I haven't ever seen a CCNP boot camp. I wonder if
anyone claims to be able to prepare you for CCNP real fast like the CCNA and
MCSE type boot camps promise? Even just an ACRC boot camp would be quite a
chore. I think these boot camps must just drill you on the stuff they kn
I called Cisco today and they said to look for an email or letter between
May 24th. and June 8th. I can't see it taking longer then that to grade the
exams. I took my exam late in the month just because I knew they would not
start the process of getting things ready until after the 24th.
""cpa
There wasn't any Fulfillment History? I
didn't see any score either?
Did other ppl experience this?
"Dusty Harper (Volt Computer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi Victor!
Since others have adequately answered questions 2 & 3 I've only an answer to
your question #1.
If a question should show up on the CCNA test regarding subnets as defined
with ip subnet zero I think that the question will be clear enough to
understand what Cisco is asking of you. In o
Viet Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear Cisco Study Group,
>
> I would like to have your expertise helping me answer
> three following questions of my on-going study for
> CCNA exam.
>
> 1) Should I say subnet zero is valid in exam
> ques
I'll try a few..
1.for CCNA version 1.0, subnet zero is not valid, don't know about
version 2
2.the most common problem about tftp to any Unix is that the file being
copied to the server must exist before the copy takes place.
i.e.telnet to the server, cd to the tftp directory a
Dear Cisco Study Group,
I would like to have your expertise helping me answer
three following questions of my on-going study for
CCNA exam.
1) Should I say subnet zero is valid in exam
questions? Todd Lammle (Exam Notes), Stevens (TCP/IP
Illustrated) and Laura Chapell (CCNA Prep Lib) say no.
I was told to keep my eyes open from May 24th. thru June 8th.
"iancu mihai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> By aby chance anyone of you received their results on the exam?
> I took the test at the end of March and still no news.
>
> Is this me
I was told to expect some thing in the mail between May 24th. and June 8th.
""Glenn"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8f8pv8$7un$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8f8pv8$7un$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi there,
> Could anybody help me out as to what I should concentrate on for the CCNA
> 1.0 Exam.
> Also
CCNA 2.0 should be available 8 weeks after end of exam. That means by May
15 or so. Might take longer, though.
Be patient. Go to http:\\www.galton.com\~cisco for exam results.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
iancu mihai
Sent: Tuesd
I haven't received any results on the exam yet either. I called Cisco
yesterday and was told they are running behind on getting the results back,
so on and so on. She took my information and told me that they're test
administrator would get back to me by phone or e-mail within 24 hours with
an a
Glenn,
OSI model, access lists, OSI model, IP subnetting, OSI model.
You can get the exam objectives here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/ccna_407
.pdf
Did I mention the OSI model? ;-)
Good luck,
Pat
Pat Talbot, CNE,CCNA,CCDA
-Original
401 - 455 of 455 matches
Mail list logo
