ain the benefit of using BGP and holding the routing
tables
> on your router versus having the ISP hold the tables and you just receive a
> default-route? Thanks.
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
"Government can do something for the
:
> Could anyone explain the benefit of using BGP and holding the routing
tables
> on your router versus having the ISP hold the tables and you just receive a
> default-route? Thanks.
--
Thomas Crowe
Senior Engineer / Senior Architect
EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect
E
Could anyone explain the benefit of using BGP and holding the routing tables
on your router versus having the ISP hold the tables and you just receive a
default-route? Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70788&
>Hi Folks,
>Can anyone ( specially the likes of Berkowitzs, Forsyths, Oppenheimers,
>etc ) comment on the advantages of having multiple "IP routing tables" in a
>router such as featured by Juniper in its M-Series machines. Would it not
>consume comparatively more hardware
Hi Folks,
Can anyone ( specially the likes of Berkowitzs, Forsyths, Oppenheimers,
etc ) comment on the advantages of having multiple "IP routing tables" in a
router such as featured by Juniper in its M-Series machines. Would it not
consume comparatively more hardware resources on a
Priscilla,
> > > just need to verify my thinking:
> > >
> > > example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip
> > > unnumbered.
> > >
> > > router A:
> > > e0=192.168.1.1/24
> > > s0=192.168.3.1/24
>
>
> Why does s0 have an address if it's unnumbered?
Good catch. I did not
>Subject: ??Fw: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables
>Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:15:29 -0800
>
>Is the below a dumb question?
>
>Nobody replied. Can somebody enlighten me? ;-)
>
>p.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Nobody replied. Can somebody enlighten me? ;-)
> >
> >p.
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:07 PM
> >Subject: need clari
23, 2001 2:07 PM
>Subject: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables
>
>
> > just need to verify my thinking:
> >
> > example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip
> > unnumbered.
> >
> > router A:
> > e0=192.168.1
Is the below a dumb question?
Nobody replied. Can somebody enlighten me? ;-)
p.
- Original Message -
From: "nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:07 PM
Subject: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables
just need to verify my thinking:
example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip
unnumbered.
router A:
e0=192.168.1.1/24
s0=192.168.3.1/24
routing table for A:
c192.168.1.0/24is directly connected, ethernet0
r192.168.2.0/24[120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:05
interesting idea!
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 27 November, 2000 19:03
Subject: Re: IP routing tables
> Kevin,
> Thanks, but it's the floating statics that are overriden by dynamic routes
> I w
EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: IP routing tables
[snipped]
So what, you might very easily ask, does the second stage use to look
up intra-area routes? In the real world, there is a temporary
"routing table." Also in the real world, this would be too
>"Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 28/11/2000 01:37:13
>am
>
>Please respond to "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc:
>
>
>Subjec
7 am
Please respond to "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: IP routing tables
>
> And another nasty one - how about static routes (short of 'show run', of
ent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: IP routing tables
>Kevin,
>Yes, the candidate routes sound like what I'm after. I expect you're
right
>about needing a separate command for each routing protocol. I have a
>feeling that I may be asking f
>
> And another nasty one - how about static routes (short of 'show run', of
> course)?
>
> JMcL
>
from the lab:
LabR05#sh ip route ?
Hostname or A.B.C.D Network to display information about or hostname
bgp Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)
connectedConnected
e
---------
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 27/11/2000 12:06:51 pm
>
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Subject: Re: IP routing tables
>
>
>
>it sounds like you'd be interested in all the candidate routes a given
>routing
Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 27/11/2000
> 03:53 pm -------
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 27/11/2000 12:06:51 pm
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Subject: Re: IP routing tables
>
>
>
> it sou
Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 27/11/2000
03:53 pm ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 27/11/2000 12:06:51 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP routing tables
it sounds like you'd be interested in all the candidate r
ehalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 7:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: IP routing tables
Show ip route [name of protocol]
e.g to show all the RIP routes: show ip route rip
HTH
Chuck
133 days or so. Clock's ticking!
-Origin
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP routing tables
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there is an IOS command that will show the routing
table for (or contributed by) a particular routing protocol, when there are
multiple routing protocols running?
In other words, a command to show what the IP routing
shouldent it be
#show ip
correct me if Im wrong.
Aditya Kedia
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 12:07 AM
Subject: IP routing tables
> Hi all,
> Does anyone know if there is an IOS command
According to what I got,you are interested to know about the
topology/neighbours per protocol basis..
Need to use different commands for different protocols Like..
For eigrp: "Show ip eigrp neighbours " or Show ip eigrp topology
FOr OSPF: Show ip ospf neighbors.
and so onn..
Hope this helps
he same applies for EGPs . . .
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 11/26/2000 07:07:21 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Kevin Cullimore)
Subject: IP routing tables
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there is an IOS command that wil
Hi Jenny,
To see the actual protocol-specific routing table you have to use the
protocol specific command...
For example :
sh ip ospf database
sh ip bgp
Cheers.
At 11:07 AM 27/11/2000 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi all,
>Does anyone know if there is an IOS command that will show the rou
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there is an IOS command that will show the routing
table for (or contributed by) a particular routing protocol, when there are
multiple routing protocols running?
In other words, a command to show what the IP routing table would look like
if there was only a single rout
>>"Deloso, Elmer G." wrote:
>> > When comparing Distance Vector with Link State protocols, although the
>> > procedures are different,
>> > isn't the end result for both the same? That is, having a complete map
>> > of the entire network?
>> > Please correct me if I'm missing something. Thank
I thought I'd clear up one thing in my message about routing protocols
before Howard gets frustrated. ;-) It's not the routing protocol that does
or does not do load sharing (sometimes called load balancing, even though
it's usually not very balanced.)
The routing table installation task makes
>"Deloso, Elmer G." wrote:
> > When comparing Distance Vector with Link State protocols, although the
> > procedures are different,
> > isn't the end result for both the same? That is, having a complete map
> > of the entire network?
> > Please correct me if I'm missing something. Thanks.
It's
distance Vector protocols do not have a complete map of the network, but
Link state protocols do
"Deloso, Elmer G." wrote:
>
>
> When comparing Distance Vector with Link State protocols, although the
> procedures are different,
> isn't the end result for both the same? That is, having a complete
Title: Routing Tables
It may
help you to look at the role that CDP plays in the propogation of information
between routers as well.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Johnny DedonSent:
Thursday, July 13, 2000 11:38 AMTo: Deloso
rk?
Please correct me if I'm missing something. Thanks.
Elmer Deloso
>>
You have to remember that link-state will go by bandwidth, delay, etc. The
routing tables in link-state will be more efficient and will usually have the
better path to the destination if configured properly.
Title: Routing Tables
If I can add my two cents, the end result is to find the
nexthop for the "best route" to the destination. Link state protocols
provide each router with the information to construct a complete map of the
network. Only changes are then propagated betwe
mer G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 12:09 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Routing Tables
When comparing Distance Vector with Link State protocols, although the
procedures are different,
isn't the end result for both the same? That is, having a comple
Title: Routing Tables
When comparing Distance Vector with Link State protocols, although the procedures are different,
isn't the end result for both the same? That is, having a complete map of the entire network?
Please correct me if I'm missing something. Thanks.
Elmer Deloso
36 matches
Mail list logo
