interesting

figure it out after running a debug trace on UDP but still i think it was an interesting prob and thought maybe someone could give me a better explanation to it. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and

Interesting proposition

I know there are several people on the list who are renting out remote-access time on their racks to help cover the cost of their equipment. I've got a contract with an important IT training site to produce sample CCIE lab materials that would be available free on the web. Perhaps we could trad

interesting traffic?

I have an 804 isdn router that doesnt seem to want to generate a call even if i do a broadcast ping of 255.255.255.255 i did a debug and got a message of something like " no interesting traffic" can someone give me an example to force this thing to dial the host router?? th

Interesting Question

Hi; One router with 2 interface, one tokenring, one ethernet, how can I ping each other. Ehternet can ping tokenring, tokenring can not ping ethernet, change the mtu size in the tokenring already, but still unable to ping.. thanks Vincent _ FAQ, list archives,

Re: interesting

blem ? > > > Regards > Atif > > P.S : I managed to figure it out after running a debug trace on UDP but > still i think it was an interesting prob and thought maybe someone could > give me a better explanation to it. > > __

RE: interesting

om: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] : Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 9:07 AM : To: Atif Awan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Subject: Re: interesting : : : My guess is that it's because "no ip directed-broadcast" is : the default on : each interface in 12.0. that's just a guess, I ha

Re: interesting

f Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, July 06, 2000 7:21 PM Subject: Re: interesting >My guess is that it's because "no ip directed-broadcast" is the default on >each interface in 12.0. that's just a guess, I haven&#

Re: interesting

EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, July 06, 2000 7:56 PM Subject: RE: interesting >>From my experience, this is the case in an attempt to reduce/eliminate >smurf amplification on the Internet. > >My company uses an application which ut

Re: interesting

No Stull, i dont think WINS uses directed broadcast and there was no WINS server in the network i was talking about. Regards Atif -Original Message- From: Stull, Cory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Atif Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, July 07, 2000 12:02 AM Subject: RE:

RE: interesting

nal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Atif Awan > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 8:26 AM > To: Stull, Cory > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: interesting > > > No Stull, i dont think WINS uses directed broadcast and there was no

Re: interesting traffic?

under the interface (bri or dialer) which dials type the following command "dialer-group 1" then create an access list which permits any ip packet "dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit" that should do the trick and generate interesting traffic Santosh Koshy "beth shriver&q

Re: interesting traffic?

Yes what i think is that you have forgot the 'dialer-group 1' command on the dialer interface and 'dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit' or 'dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 1' where list 1 is the access list you define to generate the interesting traffic. Khal

OT - but interesting.

Goto www.openhack.com and get details on making $50,000. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Interesting Question

how are they connected? serial? What interfaces are you pinging the ether and token? Are both interfaces up/up? On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Vincent wrote: > Hi; > > One router with 2 interface, one tokenring, one ethernet, how can I ping > each other. > Ehternet can ping tokenring, tokenring can n

Re: Interesting Question

Let me explain more detailed. It's a simple eigrp network, all interface in the network can ping each other, Let say (Router A) tokenring ring can ping (Router B) ethernet and vice versa. Except (Router A) Tokenring can't ping (Router A) ethernet, but can ping in different direction, ethernet to t

Re: Interesting Question

where are you trying to ping the token ring from? The router itself? That will never work, because it's a layer 2. Ping the token ring interface from a PC ""Vincent"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8t6e4v$tto$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8t6e4v$tto$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi; > > One router with

Re: Interesting Question

Is a connected route showing upo for both interfaces?? Brian On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Vincent wrote: > Hi; > > One router with 2 interface, one tokenring, one ethernet, how can I ping > each other. > Ehternet can ping tokenring, tokenring can not ping ethernet, change the mtu > s

Interesting [7:37826]

IN this newsgroup if you type a special sign , the news will be break by the newsgroup ... > this sign is OK but if you use the arrow pointing to the left sign, the news will be stoped. so in my previous news, 2 of them are chopped off by the news server. ^_^ " Message Posted at:

interesting part 2

well the scenario is the same .. 3 routers connected in a hub and spoke topology with the 2620 ( IOS 12.1(1)) as the hub. This time the DHCP is not working across the WAN. it used to work fine before the 2620 came in .. are there any IOS 12.1(1) bugs or something like that which will prevent

BGP newbie question, interesting

Is it possible to run IBGP as the ONLY IGP for a particular network (AS)?? I know all routers would know about outside networks, but how about different internal areas knowing about what other networks are advertising BGP seems so capable that it could almost be done without OSPF, EIGRP, etc

Interesting Article [7:5563]

Thought y'all might be interested in this article comparing Juniper to Cisco: http://www.msnbc.com/news/576895.asp Brian Mitchell Integrated Communication Solutions Silver Certified Cisco Partner Frederick, Maryland Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5563&t=556

A interesting problem -NAT

I have encounter a interesting problem :   LAN -to -LAN     E0/0   10.20.1.1/s0/1   10.20.1.2/s0/0 10.10.10.0--cisco2611---  cisco2611--10.10.12.0, Static route connect 10.10.10.0 with 10.10.12.0     In the network 10.10.10.0 ,there are two  virtural ip

Re: Interesting design issue

H.323 will negotiate "random" ports for the connection between two hosts. So you have to open everything from 1024 to 65535 for it to work. OR you could just use a proxy firewall which supports H.323 Like my favorite firewall, Raptor for NT. www.axent.com Rodgers Moore ""Richard A. Holland""

Very interesting RIP issue

Hi group! I am a lurker at best here, but today I saw something that really puzzled me. While I was looking at a trace file I noticed something unusual about the ttl values for RIP updates on a PacketEngines switch. This switch is connected to a Cat5000 and I had a sniffer in between the two. M

Re: interesting part 2

Most likely if there is different networks, you may need to use a IP helper address.  Take a look at that command because I feel that could be your problem.      ""Atif Awan"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 010701bfe84f$83c74bc0$050100c0@Tech">news:010701bfe84f$83c74bc0$050100c0@Tec

Re: interesting part 2

: Saturday, July 08, 2000 1:16 AM Subject: Re: interesting part 2 Most likely if there is different networks, you may need to use a IP helper address.  Take a look at that command because I feel that could be your problem.      ""Atif Awan"" <[EMA

Re: interesting part 2

Look at the 2501 config and compare it with the 2620. --Original Message-- From: "Atif Awan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Don Orlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 7, 2000 8:35:31 PM GMT Subject: Re: interesting part 2 All the helper addresses have

RE: interesting part 2

did you have a router involved previously?   If  not, you might want to investigate helpering   HTH   chuck      -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atif AwanSent: Friday, July 07, 2000 1:11 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: interesting

Re: interesting part 2

I agree, it sounds like you need to assigned "IP HELPER ADDRESSes" This will point to the DHCP server and opens up UDP ports 137 and 138. --Original Message-- From: "Don Orlik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 7, 2000 8:16:02 PM GMT Subje

Re: interesting part 2

Its the same man .. thats whats bothering me :) Regards Atif - Original Message - From: Jorge Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Atif Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Don Orlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 1:50 AM Subject

FW: interesting part 2

.0 no auto-summary David Toalson 816-701-4142 > -- > From: Atif Awan[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: Atif Awan > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 3:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: interesting part 2 > > well the scenario is the same .

Re: interesting part 2

In a message dated 7/7/00 4:44:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Most likely if there is different networks, you may need to use a IP helper address. Take a look at that command because I feel that could be your problem. >> Atif, I agree with Don's statement.

Re: interesting part 2

On the remote locations router add the config line below and make sure that there is a helper address on the ethernet interface pointing to the IP Address of the DHCP Server..Global config.Hope this helps.   ip dhcp-server < ip-address > or < name >   JEK Senior Network / Systems

Re: interesting part 2

people!!! give this guy a break,, he has said repeatedly that HELPER ADDRESSES have been configured properly, move a step fwd,,now,, any suggestions??? Atif, we would appreciate if u can send us the configs, is that possible:)?? 'Bliss' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: interesting part 2

Bliss, Give this guy a break,,, He has wtitten, "reapeadedly", the configs to his problem, move forward now, any suggestions 8) Remember theres alot of us in the group who only see the original post. Mark Z. << people!!! give this guy a break,, he has said repeatedly that HELPER AD

RE: interesting part 2

ld be able to do this debug throughout your network and watch the packets flow from end to end.   I hope this helps you out!   Shane    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atif AwanSent: Friday, July 07, 2000 2:11 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: interesting part 2 wel

Re: interesting part 2

l. Kenny     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atif AwanSent: Friday, July 07, 2000 2:11 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: interesting part 2 well the scenario is the same .. 3 routers connected in a hub and spoke topology with the 2620 ( IOS 12.1(1)) as th

Re: interesting part 2

PROTECTED]>Date: Sunday, July 09, 2000 3:55 AMSubject: Re: interesting part 2 From the first post I thought you solved it.  With enabling "directed broadcasts" depending on your addressing range will work - only cuz you are not using WINS.  If using WINS th

Interesting Link. [7:42814]

Found a new virtual lab at www.littlerack.com thought I'll post it here for all. Prices seems reasonable to me. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42814&t=42814 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.

Interesting reading [7:21756]

t the various sources. some interesting reading and some good tips to be found. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21756&t=21756 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/li

Interesting Scenerio [7:58024]

Hi Folks, I have a very interesting Scenerio.I have an AS5400 Server with 16 E1s However I want to segment these E1s such that I get different Services. I have so far used 5 E1s for Leased Line and Frame relay, Now what I want is this: 1. Two Dialin Lines say 510 and 530 2.When a user

Interesting Scenerio [7:58025]

Hi Folks, I have a very interesting Scenerio.I have an AS5400 Server with 16 E1s However I want to segment these E1s such that I get different Services. I have so far used 5 E1s for Leased Line and Frame relay, Now what I want is this: 1. Two Dialin Lines say 510 and 530 2.When a user

interesting article..... [7:61213]

> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,813833,00.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61213&t=61213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondi

Interesting Question [7:74652]

Dear Readers Does any one know the Mathematical reason for making 127.X.X.X as a Loop Back address, if so please let me know Thanks in advance Bani Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74652&t=74652 -- **Please supp

Snapshot Routing and Interesting traffic

all configured baseline snapshot (just the ISDN = circuit and 1 loopback) and it works great. I progressed to follow the = requirements of David's scenario which makes use of the Ethernet circuit = and commands to support ISDN backup of the Ethernet line. Here is where = things get intere

Re: BGP newbie question, interesting

But remember, you have to do full iBGP peering inside your AS. When you have two routers, it wouldn't be a problem for no IGP. When you have more than two, unless they are connected by a share medium (such as Ethernet) and peer using the connected interface, otherwise, you have to make some intra

Re: BGP newbie question, interesting

Dan West -- CCNA, CCNP (in progress) asked, >Is it possible to run IBGP as the ONLY IGP for a >particular network (AS)?? Possible, but not a good idea in almost any situation. iBGP really is an unfortunate term. It is a protocol for coordinating the "outside" activities of eBGP, and is not i

Re: BGP newbie question, interesting

Hi Dan, I thought I would throw my two cents in. There are a few key reasons why one requires an interior routing protocol (or at worst case a routing strategy should one use statics) within an AS. First and foremost, you must consider what iBGP does within the AS. Essentially, it allows i

RE: BGP newbie question, interesting

l with the hellos, updates,etc. Thoughts anyone ? Winston. -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP newbie question, interesting Dan West -- CCNA, CCNP (in progress) aske

Re: BGP newbie question, interesting

In case you have 2 routers connect back-to-back with iBGP, you don't need IGP. ""Shaw, Winston Mr 5 SIG CMD"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I saw this original question yesterday but got sidetracked before I could > send a response. > I think

Re: BGP newbie question, interesting

I would clarify that the rule here is that you each BGP speaking router needs to have a route to the Next Hop routers advertised into the AS. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/21/2000 at 9:43 PM Katson PN Yeung wrote: >In case you have 2 routers connect back-to-back with iBGP, y

Interesting Console issue [7:592]

Hi, Here is a fun scenario I have - maybe someone else had that too. I am working on a lab with about 30 routers. All work fine (in terms of console) but two of the routers (26xx and 3640) dump weird funny characters after the initial two lines upon booting. I thought it was the baud rate or a

interesting rip behaviour [7:3070]

I have notice something interesting when doing a rip scenario on a frame-relay hub-spoke setup. I had just turned off split-horizon on the hub. When I did a 'ip route clear *' on one of the spokes to force the removal of the rip routes, I noticed the following debug trace on this spok

Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7272&t=7272 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://w

Interesting NAT problem [7:8045]

Hi all, Does anyone have an explanation for this behavior ! Here's the setup .. my sun --- internal net comm-svr linux 64.102.66.25 172.18.176.43 206.0.1.43 206.0.1.53 I have to nat 206.0.1.53

Interesting Web Alias [7:34994]

All, Interesting? Follow this link: www.american.com Can't imagine why Cisco registered this domain name. Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34994&t=34994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscripti

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

Not sure what the nature of the problem is here, but here are a couple of points to note: 1. The TTL field is in the IP header and not the UDP header. 2. The TTL is only decremented after the packet crosses a router hop ( a switch hop does NOT count). 3. The inital TTL=15, and it gets decrement

RE: Very interesting RIP issue

amble -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cormac Long Sent: June 4, 2000 7:14 AM To: Lance Simon; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Very interesting RIP issue Not sure what the nature of the problem is here, but here are a couple of points to note: 1

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

Actually, if the switch is routing, it will decrement the hop or ttl value. And the ttl on a RIP update is in the UDP header. If you are not convinced I will send you the traces. And finally, as Travis stated, a RIP update should only have max ttl of 2. Lance Cormac Long wrote: > Not sure wha

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

It would be very interesting to see these traces. The switch must be doing something very wierd. A UDP header consists of Source Port, Dest Port, Length and the checksum... TTL's are usually L3 and a max TTL 2 indicates somethings really screwed up. Nimesh. On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Lance

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

Yes, I was wrong about it not being in the IP header. The ttl is in the ip header. RIP updates are transported over UDP port 520. Now, what do you think the ttl for a RIP update should be, Nimesh? And why? Nimesh Vakharia wrote: > It would be very interesting to see these traces. The swi

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

Doesn't RIP 'route by rumours' - ie: only exchange updates with its immediate neighbours. A TTL of 2 would acheive this as it will not be forwarded past the immediate neighbour (the TTL is decremented and if the next hop of a packet with a TTL of 1 is not directly connected to the router then the

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

d over UDP port 520. Now, what do you > think the ttl for a RIP update should be, Nimesh? And why? > > Nimesh Vakharia wrote: > > > It would be very interesting to see these traces. The switch must be doing > > something very wierd. A UDP header consists of Source Port,

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

ld be, Nimesh? And why? > > > > Nimesh Vakharia wrote: > > > > > It would be very interesting to see these traces. The switch must be doing > > > something very wierd. A UDP header consists of Source Port, Dest Port, > > > Length and the checksum.

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

; > Yes, I was wrong about it not being in the IP header. The ttl is in the ip > > > header. RIP updates are transported over UDP port 520. Now, what do you > > > think the ttl for a RIP update should be, Nimesh? And why? > > > > > > Nimesh Vakharia wrote:

Re: Very interesting RIP issue

the ip > > > header. RIP updates are transported over UDP > port 520. Now, what do you > > > think the ttl for a RIP update should be, > Nimesh? And why? > > > > > > Nimesh Vakharia wrote: > > > > > > > It would be very interesting to s

Interesting OSPF Question [7:40718]

Guys, I found that that the command for Virtual Link, i.e Area X virtual-link a.b.c.d has options to change Hello and Dead interval as well. Does it means that when we change the Hello and Dead interval in AREA 0, We must have to modify these values here on virtual link command as well?? Plea

Interesting VOFR experiment [7:44307]

Folks while studying for the CCIE lab I was working on the VOIP portion. I was configuring VOFR and according to Caslow 2nd edition, page 781 he states: “NOTE: the configuration above will support a Voice over Frame-Relay service only. It does not support both Voice and Data over Frame-Relay.” D

Interesting redundancy scenario [7:26066]

Hi all I encountered an interesting scenario (salesman to customer: sure we can do that, I don't see why the sun can't revolve around the Earth, our solution is so great we can make it revolve clockwise or counterclockwise...) I opened a TAC (actually 2 cases) case for this and I

CCDP Recert - Interesting [7:71857]

Being paranoid about what topics of conversation are permissible, let me just say that the blueprint is certainly worth reviewing. The test itself covered quite a bit of material from I would call the CCNP track - routing, switching, etc, along with the thingsd I remember from the CID test a few ye

Re: Interesting Question [7:74652]

I don't know why a Class A address was chosen...personnally, I would have chosen a Class C address...less wasteful. However, I might be missing the point here, tho... ""Bharani"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dear Readers > > Does any one know the Mathematical reason for making > 12

RE: Interesting Question [7:74652]

rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Bharani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Interesting Question [7:74652] Dear Readers Does any one know the Mathematical

RE: Interesting Question [7:74652]

otify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Bharani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Interesting Question [7:74652]

hank you Ollie AT&T Common Backbone 866-397-7309 Opt 1 -Original Message- From: Bharani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Interesting Question [7:74652] Dear Readers Does any one know the Mathematical reason for ma

Re: Snapshot Routing and Interesting traffic

] www.exodus.net - Original Message - From: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CCIE_Lab Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cisco Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Bryant Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001

Re: Snapshot Routing and Interesting traffic

pshot (just the ISDN = >circuit and 1 loopback) and it works great. I progressed to follow the = >requirements of David's scenario which makes use of the Ethernet circuit = >and commands to support ISDN backup of the Ethernet line. Here is where = >things get interesting The ISDN

Re: Snapshot Routing and Interesting traffic

pshot (just the ISDN = >circuit and 1 loopback) and it works great. I progressed to follow the = >requirements of David's scenario which makes use of the Ethernet circuit = >and commands to support ISDN backup of the Ethernet line. Here is where = >things get interesting The ISDN

Interesting site with lots of links.

http://routergod.com **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt

Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

Somewhat a long read but very enlightening. The article on Windows XP was just as scary. Thank you so much Priscilla, I'm going to pass your find on to some other network folks that could use it. >Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm > > Priscilla > > __

Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

That was a very interesting article. I knew things like that went on, but have never had a person experience of such. I liked the detail that was gone into about the solution. I am forwarding the link to friends. Jennifer Cribbs 6/5/2001 9:52:31 PM, "Natasha" wrote: >Somewha

Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

June 05, 2001 6:54 PM Subject: Interesting DOS article [7:7272] > http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm > > Priscilla > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7301&t=727

Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

Interesting and scary. I shall pass this on. Thank you Dom Marino ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm > > Priscilla > > > >

Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

At 10:33 PM 6/5/01, Natasha wrote: >Somewhat a long read but very enlightening. >The article on Windows XP was just as scary. The article is awfully long, indeed, but I found it fascinating (and scary). For those of you who have no idea what we're talking about, it's probably because the e-mail

Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

I think I'll make this required reading for my next class. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > At 10:33 PM 6/5/01, Natasha wrote: > >Somewhat a long read but very enlightening. > >The article on Windows XP w

RE: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lisa Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272] I think I'll make this required reading for my next class. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Netwo

RE: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

i would be VERY intrested in seing a security list!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William E. Gragido Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Interesting DOS article [7:7272] I recommnend also

Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

Fascinating article (I spent almost an hour on this article and his web site). Highly recommended. Thanks, Priscilla. -Jonathan Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm > > Priscilla > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com -- Jonath

RE: Interesting Web Alias [7:34994]

This guy also made site bulder for Novell way back when..1995 and he owned www.american.com then So Cisco got the site name as bonus I guess http://www.i-m.com/February-22-29-1996/0030.html here is what the corp did amd the corp name was American Internet Company. I think Cisoc like the name more

Re: Interesting Web Alias [7:34994]

AIC (American Internet Comp) made, among other things, a DHCP server product. Cisco bought AIC and repackaged the AIC DHCP server as CNR. Ozzie Sutcliffe wrote: > > This guy also made site bulder for Novell way back when..1995 and he owned > www.american.com then > So Cisco got the site name

RE: Interesting Web Alias [7:34994]

Makes sense now. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Pretty cool URL to have though, huh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of bergenpeak Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Interesting Web Alias [7

BGP Link Bandwidth. Interesting [7:40655]

Just snooping around cisco and found this interesting enhancement for unequal load balancing for both ibgp and ebgp. It'll advertise the exit link bandwidth as a community to you can make routing decisions on it. Pretty cool. Here's the link. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/d

not cisco but interesting... [7:14547]

This is not cisco, but alot of things aren't. I received this from my brother-n-law. Any vietnam vets out there in cisco land? It is entitled: "Who is doing the honoring?" = Who is doing the honoring? Whether or not you believed in the war, this is the story of

Interesting UK Employment article [7:15556]

Thought the report below from cw360 was interesting, particularly the final paragraph: The demand for IT professionals has plummeted to its lowest level since the last recession as businesses rein back their IT budgets and put major e-commerce projects on hold. The number of IT jobs advertised

Interesting PIX / HTTP problem [7:26646]

The internal users from my company are accessing a web site from our secured backbone going through PIX and Raptor. There are 2 servers with different public IP address . The two servers are identical according to the server admin and application folks. One of them is accessible from our backbone

Re: Interesting traffic problem ..... [7:46761]

what to do next :) Any help would be greatly appreciated ... Thanks again ... Regards .. Paul ... - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:46 PM Subject: Re: Interesting traffic problem . [7:46761] > Einstooge makes some good points. > Also, when y

Re: Interesting traffic problem ..... [7:46761]

ce you can call successfully from remote to main, it appears that your ISDN is OK. Try "debug dialer" at the main office when you try to get a connection. If there's not a lot of traffic, you could try "debug dialer packet". What does it show? Are any packets being seen a

Interesting NAT/PAT scenario [7:18418]

Here's a puzzler for you: "Their" 192.168.10.0/24 Network | "Their" Default gateway | "Their" VPN 3030 Concentrator running PAT w/ external interface 2.2.2.2 (Reference Point A) | Another default gateway leading to... | The Internet | "My" gateway router

Interesting "clear arp" behavior [7:21984]

dst 10.1.1.1 .. Ethernet0 As you can see, when I cleared the ARP cache the router sent an ARP request to itself and then sent four gratuitous ARP replies. Very interesting! It doesn't stop there. Next, I pinged 10.1.1.2 so that it would also show up in R1's ARP c

Interesting terminal server issue [7:48247]

Hey guys, I have a home lab setup for my CCIE studies and I have been bumping into a random issue with my terminal server. I have a 2509 that I use with an Octal cable to connect to my routers and switches. Frequently I will see a line go hot without me having initiated a session (I see an

Re: CCDP Recert - Interesting [7:71857]

thanks for the info. do you know if it is possible to just re-take the CID test to recert the CCDP if I have just completed the CCNP recert exam? or do i have to do the CCDP recert exam to recert CCDP? ""Hemingway"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Being paranoid about what topics of co

  1   2   3   >