figure it out after running a debug trace on UDP but
still i think it was an interesting prob and thought maybe someone could
give me a better explanation to it.
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and
I know there are several people on the list who are renting out
remote-access time on their racks to help cover the cost of their equipment.
I've got a contract with an important IT training site to produce sample
CCIE lab materials that would be available free on the web.
Perhaps we could trad
I have an 804 isdn router that doesnt seem to want to
generate a call even if i do a broadcast ping of
255.255.255.255 i did a debug and got a message of
something like " no interesting traffic" can someone
give me an example to force this thing to dial the
host router??
th
Hi;
One router with 2 interface, one tokenring, one ethernet, how can I ping
each other.
Ehternet can ping tokenring, tokenring can not ping ethernet, change the mtu
size in the
tokenring already, but still unable to ping..
thanks
Vincent
_
FAQ, list archives,
blem ?
>
>
> Regards
> Atif
>
> P.S : I managed to figure it out after running a debug trace on UDP but
> still i think it was an interesting prob and thought maybe someone could
> give me a better explanation to it.
>
> __
om: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
: Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 9:07 AM
: To: Atif Awan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Subject: Re: interesting
:
:
: My guess is that it's because "no ip directed-broadcast" is
: the default on
: each interface in 12.0. that's just a guess, I ha
f Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, July 06, 2000 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: interesting
>My guess is that it's because "no ip directed-broadcast" is the default on
>each interface in 12.0. that's just a guess, I haven
EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, July 06, 2000 7:56 PM
Subject: RE: interesting
>>From my experience, this is the case in an attempt to reduce/eliminate
>smurf amplification on the Internet.
>
>My company uses an application which ut
No Stull, i dont think WINS uses directed broadcast and there was no WINS
server in the network i was talking about.
Regards
Atif
-Original Message-
From: Stull, Cory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Atif Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, July 07, 2000 12:02 AM
Subject: RE:
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Atif Awan
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 8:26 AM
> To: Stull, Cory
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: interesting
>
>
> No Stull, i dont think WINS uses directed broadcast and there was no
under the interface (bri or dialer) which dials type the following command
"dialer-group 1"
then create an access list which permits any ip packet
"dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit"
that should do the trick and generate interesting traffic
Santosh Koshy
"beth shriver&q
Yes what i think is that you have forgot the
'dialer-group 1' command on the dialer interface and
'dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit' or 'dialer-list 1
protocol ip list 1' where list 1 is the access list
you define to generate the interesting traffic.
Khal
Goto www.openhack.com and get details on making $50,000.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how are they connected? serial? What interfaces are you pinging the ether
and token? Are both interfaces up/up?
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Vincent wrote:
> Hi;
>
> One router with 2 interface, one tokenring, one ethernet, how can I ping
> each other.
> Ehternet can ping tokenring, tokenring can n
Let me explain more detailed.
It's a simple eigrp network, all interface in the network can ping each
other,
Let say (Router A) tokenring ring can ping (Router B) ethernet and vice
versa.
Except (Router A) Tokenring can't ping (Router A) ethernet, but can ping in
different direction, ethernet to t
where are you trying to ping the token ring from? The router itself? That
will never work, because it's a layer 2. Ping the token ring interface from
a PC
""Vincent"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8t6e4v$tto$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8t6e4v$tto$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi;
>
> One router with
Is a connected route showing upo for both interfaces??
Brian
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Vincent wrote:
> Hi;
>
> One router with 2 interface, one tokenring, one ethernet, how can I ping
> each other.
> Ehternet can ping tokenring, tokenring can not ping ethernet, change the mtu
> s
IN this newsgroup
if you type a special sign , the news will be break by the newsgroup ...
> this sign is OK
but if you use the arrow pointing to the left sign, the news will be stoped.
so in my previous news, 2 of them are chopped off by the news server.
^_^ "
Message Posted at:
well the scenario is the same .. 3 routers
connected in a hub and spoke topology with the 2620 ( IOS 12.1(1)) as the hub.
This time the DHCP is not working across the WAN. it used to work fine before
the 2620 came in .. are there any IOS 12.1(1) bugs or something like that which
will prevent
Is it possible to run IBGP as the ONLY IGP for a
particular network (AS)??
I know all routers would know about outside networks,
but how about different internal areas knowing about
what other networks are advertising
BGP seems so capable that it could almost be done
without OSPF, EIGRP, etc
Thought y'all might be interested in this article comparing Juniper to
Cisco:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/576895.asp
Brian Mitchell
Integrated Communication Solutions
Silver Certified Cisco Partner
Frederick, Maryland
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5563&t=556
I have encounter a interesting problem
:
LAN -to -LAN
E0/0
10.20.1.1/s0/1 10.20.1.2/s0/0
10.10.10.0--cisco2611---
cisco2611--10.10.12.0,
Static route connect 10.10.10.0 with 10.10.12.0
In the network 10.10.10.0 ,there are two
virtural ip
H.323 will negotiate "random" ports for the connection between two hosts.
So you have to open everything from 1024 to 65535 for it to work. OR you
could just use a proxy firewall which supports H.323 Like my favorite
firewall, Raptor for NT. www.axent.com
Rodgers Moore
""Richard A. Holland""
Hi group!
I am a lurker at best here, but today I saw something that really
puzzled me. While I was looking at a trace file I noticed something
unusual about the ttl values for RIP updates on a PacketEngines switch.
This switch is connected to a Cat5000 and I had a sniffer in between the
two.
M
Most likely if there is different networks, you may
need to use a IP helper address. Take a look at that command because
I feel that could be your problem.
""Atif Awan"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 010701bfe84f$83c74bc0$050100c0@Tech">news:010701bfe84f$83c74bc0$050100c0@Tec
: Saturday, July 08, 2000 1:16
AM
Subject: Re: interesting part 2
Most likely if there is different networks, you
may need to use a IP helper address. Take a look at that command
because I feel that could be your problem.
""Atif Awan"" <[EMA
Look at the 2501 config and compare it with the 2620.
--Original Message--
From: "Atif Awan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Don Orlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 7, 2000 8:35:31 PM GMT
Subject: Re: interesting part 2
All the helper addresses have
did
you have a router involved previously?
If not, you might want to investigate
helpering
HTH
chuck
-Original
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atif AwanSent:
Friday, July 07, 2000 1:11 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: interesting
I agree, it sounds like you need to assigned "IP HELPER ADDRESSes" This will
point to the DHCP server and opens up UDP ports 137 and 138.
--Original Message--
From: "Don Orlik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 7, 2000 8:16:02 PM GMT
Subje
Its the same man .. thats whats bothering me :)
Regards
Atif
- Original Message -
From: Jorge Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Atif Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Don Orlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 1:50 AM
Subject
.0
no auto-summary
David Toalson
816-701-4142
> --
> From: Atif Awan[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: Atif Awan
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 3:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: interesting part 2
>
> well the scenario is the same .
In a message dated 7/7/00 4:44:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Most likely if there is different networks, you may need to use a IP
helper address. Take a look at that command because I feel that could be
your problem.
>>
Atif,
I agree with Don's statement.
On the remote locations router add the config line
below and make sure that
there is a helper address on the ethernet interface
pointing to the IP Address
of the DHCP Server..Global config.Hope this
helps.
ip dhcp-server < ip-address > or < name
>
JEK
Senior Network / Systems
people!!!
give this guy a break,,
he has said repeatedly that HELPER ADDRESSES have been configured properly,
move a step fwd,,now,, any suggestions???
Atif, we would appreciate if u can send us the configs, is that possible:)??
'Bliss'
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bliss,
Give this guy a break,,,
He has wtitten, "reapeadedly", the configs to his problem, move forward now,
any suggestions 8) Remember theres alot of us in the group who only see the
original post.
Mark Z.
<< people!!!
give this guy a break,,
he has said repeatedly that HELPER AD
ld be able to do this debug throughout your network and watch the packets
flow from end to end.
I hope
this helps you out!
Shane
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atif
AwanSent: Friday, July 07, 2000 2:11 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: interesting part 2
wel
l.
Kenny
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atif AwanSent:
Friday, July 07, 2000 2:11 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: interesting part 2
well the scenario is the same .. 3 routers
connected in a hub and spoke topology with the 2620 ( IOS 12.1(1)) as th
PROTECTED]>Date:
Sunday, July 09, 2000 3:55 AMSubject: Re: interesting part
2
From the first post I thought you solved
it. With enabling "directed broadcasts" depending on your
addressing range will work - only cuz you are not using WINS. If using
WINS th
Found a new virtual lab at www.littlerack.com thought I'll post it here for
all. Prices seems reasonable to me.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42814&t=42814
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.
t the various sources. some interesting reading and some good tips
to be found.
Chuck
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21756&t=21756
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/li
Hi Folks,
I have a very interesting Scenerio.I have an AS5400 Server with 16 E1s
However I want to segment these E1s such that I get different Services.
I have so far used 5 E1s for Leased Line and Frame relay, Now what I want is
this:
1. Two Dialin Lines say 510 and 530
2.When a user
Hi Folks,
I have a very interesting Scenerio.I have an AS5400 Server with 16 E1s
However I want to segment these E1s such that I get different Services.
I have so far used 5 E1s for Leased Line and Frame relay, Now what I want is
this:
1. Two Dialin Lines say 510 and 530
2.When a user
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,813833,00.asp
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61213&t=61213
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondi
Dear Readers
Does any one know the Mathematical reason for making
127.X.X.X as a Loop Back address, if so please let me know
Thanks in advance
Bani
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74652&t=74652
--
**Please supp
all configured baseline snapshot (just the ISDN =
circuit and 1 loopback) and it works great. I progressed to follow the =
requirements of David's scenario which makes use of the Ethernet circuit =
and commands to support ISDN backup of the Ethernet line. Here is where =
things get intere
But remember, you have to do full iBGP peering inside your AS. When you have
two routers, it wouldn't be a problem for no IGP.
When you have more than two, unless they are connected by a share medium
(such as Ethernet) and peer using the connected interface, otherwise, you
have to make some intra
Dan West -- CCNA, CCNP (in progress) asked,
>Is it possible to run IBGP as the ONLY IGP for a
>particular network (AS)??
Possible, but not a good idea in almost any situation.
iBGP really is an unfortunate term. It is a protocol for
coordinating the "outside" activities of eBGP, and is not i
Hi Dan,
I thought I would throw my two cents in.
There are a few key reasons why one requires an interior routing protocol (or at worst
case a routing strategy should one use statics) within an AS. First and foremost, you
must consider what iBGP does within the AS. Essentially, it allows i
l with the hellos, updates,etc.
Thoughts anyone ?
Winston.
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP newbie question, interesting
Dan West -- CCNA, CCNP (in progress) aske
In case you have 2 routers connect back-to-back with iBGP, you don't need
IGP.
""Shaw, Winston Mr 5 SIG CMD"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I saw this original question yesterday but got sidetracked before I could
> send a response.
> I think
I would clarify that the rule here is that you each BGP speaking router needs to have
a route to the Next Hop routers advertised into the AS.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/21/2000 at 9:43 PM Katson PN Yeung wrote:
>In case you have 2 routers connect back-to-back with iBGP, y
Hi,
Here is a fun scenario I have - maybe someone else had that too.
I am working on a lab with about 30 routers. All work fine (in terms of
console) but two of the routers (26xx and 3640) dump weird funny characters
after the initial two lines upon booting. I thought it was the baud rate or
a
I have notice something interesting when doing a rip scenario on a
frame-relay hub-spoke setup. I had just turned off split-horizon on the hub.
When I did a 'ip route clear *' on one of the spokes to force the removal of
the rip routes, I noticed the following debug trace on this spok
http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm
Priscilla
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7272&t=7272
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://w
Hi all,
Does anyone have an explanation for this behavior !
Here's the setup ..
my sun --- internal net comm-svr
linux
64.102.66.25 172.18.176.43 206.0.1.43
206.0.1.53
I have to nat 206.0.1.53
All,
Interesting? Follow this link:
www.american.com
Can't imagine why Cisco registered this domain name.
Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34994&t=34994
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscripti
Not sure what the nature of the problem is here, but
here are a couple of points to note:
1. The TTL field is in the IP header and not the UDP
header.
2. The TTL is only decremented after the packet
crosses a router hop ( a switch hop does NOT count).
3. The inital TTL=15, and it gets decrement
amble
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Cormac Long
Sent: June 4, 2000 7:14 AM
To: Lance Simon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Very interesting RIP issue
Not sure what the nature of the problem is here, but
here are a couple of points to note:
1
Actually, if the switch is routing, it will decrement the hop or ttl
value. And the ttl on a RIP update is in the UDP header. If you are
not convinced I will send you the traces. And finally, as Travis
stated, a RIP update should only have max ttl of 2.
Lance
Cormac Long wrote:
> Not sure wha
It would be very interesting to see these traces. The switch must be doing
something very wierd. A UDP header consists of Source Port, Dest Port,
Length and the checksum... TTL's are usually L3 and a max TTL 2 indicates
somethings really screwed up.
Nimesh.
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Lance
Yes, I was wrong about it not being in the IP header. The ttl is in the ip
header. RIP updates are transported over UDP port 520. Now, what do you
think the ttl for a RIP update should be, Nimesh? And why?
Nimesh Vakharia wrote:
> It would be very interesting to see these traces. The swi
Doesn't RIP 'route by rumours' - ie: only exchange updates with its
immediate neighbours. A TTL of 2 would acheive this as it will not be
forwarded past the immediate neighbour (the TTL is decremented and if the
next hop of a packet with a TTL of 1 is not directly connected to the router
then the
d over UDP port 520. Now, what do you
> think the ttl for a RIP update should be, Nimesh? And why?
>
> Nimesh Vakharia wrote:
>
> > It would be very interesting to see these traces. The switch must be doing
> > something very wierd. A UDP header consists of Source Port,
ld be, Nimesh? And why?
> >
> > Nimesh Vakharia wrote:
> >
> > > It would be very interesting to see these traces. The switch must be doing
> > > something very wierd. A UDP header consists of Source Port, Dest Port,
> > > Length and the checksum.
; > Yes, I was wrong about it not being in the IP header. The ttl is in the ip
> > > header. RIP updates are transported over UDP port 520. Now, what do you
> > > think the ttl for a RIP update should be, Nimesh? And why?
> > >
> > > Nimesh Vakharia wrote:
the ip
> > > header. RIP updates are transported over UDP
> port 520. Now, what do you
> > > think the ttl for a RIP update should be,
> Nimesh? And why?
> > >
> > > Nimesh Vakharia wrote:
> > >
> > > > It would be very interesting to s
Guys,
I found that that the command for Virtual Link, i.e
Area X virtual-link a.b.c.d
has options to change Hello and Dead interval as well.
Does it means that when we change the Hello and Dead interval in AREA 0,
We must have to modify these values here on virtual link command as well??
Plea
Folks while studying for the CCIE lab I was working on the VOIP portion. I
was configuring VOFR and according to Caslow 2nd edition, page 781 he states:
NOTE: the configuration above will support a Voice over Frame-Relay service
only. It does not support both Voice and Data over Frame-Relay.
D
Hi all
I encountered an interesting scenario (salesman to customer: sure we can do
that, I don't see why the sun can't revolve around the Earth, our solution
is so great we can make it revolve clockwise or counterclockwise...)
I opened a TAC (actually 2 cases) case for this and I
Being paranoid about what topics of conversation are permissible, let me
just say that the blueprint is certainly worth reviewing. The test itself
covered quite a bit of material from I would call the CCNP track - routing,
switching, etc, along with the thingsd I remember from the CID test a few
ye
I don't know why a Class A address was chosen...personnally, I would have
chosen a Class C address...less wasteful. However, I might be missing the
point here, tho...
""Bharani"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dear Readers
>
> Does any one know the Mathematical reason for making
> 12
rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Bharani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Interesting Question [7:74652]
Dear Readers
Does any one know the Mathematical
otify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Bharani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
hank you
Ollie
AT&T Common Backbone
866-397-7309 Opt 1
-Original Message-
From: Bharani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Interesting Question [7:74652]
Dear Readers
Does any one know the Mathematical reason for ma
]
www.exodus.net
- Original Message -
From: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CCIE_Lab Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cisco Group Study"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Bryant Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001
pshot (just the ISDN =
>circuit and 1 loopback) and it works great. I progressed to follow the =
>requirements of David's scenario which makes use of the Ethernet circuit =
>and commands to support ISDN backup of the Ethernet line. Here is where =
>things get interesting The ISDN
pshot (just the ISDN =
>circuit and 1 loopback) and it works great. I progressed to follow the =
>requirements of David's scenario which makes use of the Ethernet circuit =
>and commands to support ISDN backup of the Ethernet line. Here is where =
>things get interesting The ISDN
http://routergod.com
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt
Somewhat a long read but very enlightening.
The article on Windows XP was just as scary.
Thank you so much Priscilla, I'm going to pass your find on to some
other network folks that could use it.
>Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm
>
> Priscilla
>
> __
That was a very interesting article. I knew things like that went on, but
have never had a person experience of such.
I liked the detail that was gone into about the solution. I am forwarding
the link to friends.
Jennifer Cribbs
6/5/2001 9:52:31 PM, "Natasha" wrote:
>Somewha
June 05, 2001 6:54 PM
Subject: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]
> http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm
>
> Priscilla
>
>
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7301&t=727
Interesting and scary. I shall pass this on. Thank you
Dom Marino
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm
>
> Priscilla
>
>
>
>
At 10:33 PM 6/5/01, Natasha wrote:
>Somewhat a long read but very enlightening.
>The article on Windows XP was just as scary.
The article is awfully long, indeed, but I found it fascinating (and scary).
For those of you who have no idea what we're talking about, it's probably
because the e-mail
I think I'll make this required reading for my next class.
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco Regional Networking Academy
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> At 10:33 PM 6/5/01, Natasha wrote:
> >Somewhat a long read but very enlightening.
> >The article on Windows XP w
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tom Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]
I think I'll make this required reading for my next class.
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco Regional Netwo
i would be VERY intrested in seing a security list!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
William E. Gragido
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]
I recommnend also
Fascinating article (I spent almost an hour on this article and his web
site). Highly
recommended.
Thanks, Priscilla.
-Jonathan
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm
>
> Priscilla
>
>
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com
--
Jonath
This guy also made site bulder for Novell way back when..1995 and he owned
www.american.com then
So Cisco got the site name as bonus I guess
http://www.i-m.com/February-22-29-1996/0030.html here is what the corp did
amd the corp name was American Internet Company.
I think Cisoc like the name more
AIC (American Internet Comp) made, among other things, a DHCP server
product.
Cisco bought AIC and repackaged the AIC DHCP server as CNR.
Ozzie Sutcliffe wrote:
>
> This guy also made site bulder for Novell way back when..1995 and he owned
> www.american.com then
> So Cisco got the site name
Makes sense now. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Pretty cool URL to
have though, huh?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
bergenpeak
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Interesting Web Alias [7
Just snooping around cisco and found this interesting enhancement for
unequal load balancing for both ibgp and ebgp. It'll advertise the exit
link bandwidth as a community to you can make routing decisions on it.
Pretty cool.
Here's the link.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/d
This is not cisco, but alot of things aren't. I received this from my
brother-n-law. Any vietnam vets out there in cisco land?
It is entitled: "Who is doing the honoring?"
=
Who is doing the honoring? Whether or not you believed in the war, this is
the story of
Thought the report below from cw360 was interesting, particularly the final
paragraph:
The demand for IT professionals has plummeted to its lowest level since the
last recession as businesses rein back their IT budgets and put major
e-commerce projects on hold.
The number of IT jobs advertised
The internal users from my company are accessing a web site from our secured
backbone going through PIX and Raptor. There are 2 servers with different
public IP address .
The two servers are identical according to the server admin and application
folks.
One of them is accessible from our backbone
what to do next :) Any help would be greatly
appreciated ...
Thanks again ...
Regards ..
Paul ...
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: Interesting traffic problem . [7:46761]
> Einstooge makes some good points.
> Also, when y
ce you can call successfully from remote to main, it appears that your
ISDN is OK.
Try "debug dialer" at the main office when you try to get a connection. If
there's not a lot of traffic, you could try "debug dialer packet".
What does it show? Are any packets being seen a
Here's a puzzler for you:
"Their" 192.168.10.0/24 Network
|
"Their" Default gateway
|
"Their" VPN 3030 Concentrator running PAT w/ external interface 2.2.2.2
(Reference Point A)
|
Another default gateway leading to...
|
The Internet
|
"My" gateway router
dst 10.1.1.1 .. Ethernet0
As you can see, when I cleared the ARP cache the router sent an ARP request
to itself and then sent four gratuitous ARP replies. Very interesting! It
doesn't stop there.
Next, I pinged 10.1.1.2 so that it would also show up in R1's ARP c
Hey guys,
I have a home lab setup for my CCIE studies and I have been bumping
into a random issue with my terminal server. I have a 2509 that I use with
an Octal cable to connect to my routers and switches. Frequently I will see
a line go hot without me having initiated a session (I see an
thanks for the info.
do you know if it is possible to just re-take the CID test to recert the
CCDP if I have just completed the CCNP recert exam? or do i have to do the
CCDP recert exam to recert CCDP?
""Hemingway"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Being paranoid about what topics of co
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo