Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Gregoire Favre"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Hello,
>
> I have looked longuely why my serial lonk to my gps was so bad for long
> time... I found that gpilotd
Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 06:52:47PM -0400, David Walluck wrote:
>
>>The console has no stars, so I say nix the stars, or at least obfuscate
>>them. What we are talking about, though, is the default for the system
>>when kdebase is installed. While I can get to it in the contr
I got this to work! I still can't build the source but
the Binary RPM works great. I finally figured out how
to get it to stop freezing. You need to CLOSELY read
how the sides of your scan are determined. Not very
intuitive but who cares... IT WORKS! :) I can use my
scanner again!
Shad
Ps. The
I got this to work! I still can't build the source but
the Binary RPM works great. I finally figured out how
to get it to stop freezing. You need to CLOSELY read
how the sides of your scan are determined. Not very
intuitive but who cares... IT WORKS! :) I can use my
scanner again!
Shad
Ps. The
I got this to work! I still can't build the source but
the Binary RPM works great. I finally figured out how
to get it to stop freezing. You need to CLOSELY read
how the sides of your scan are determined. Not very
intuitive but who cares... IT WORKS! :) I can use my
scanner again!
Shad
Ps. The
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 06:52:47PM -0400, David Walluck wrote:
> The console has no stars, so I say nix the stars, or at least obfuscate
> them. What we are talking about, though, is the default for the system
> when kdebase is installed. While I can get to it in the control panel,
> that would
To everyone sorry that this email is so long but I've
been trying to figure out how to get my scanner to
work for so long I thought it was time to take it to
cooker. I've included my configure results at the
bottom of the page so you can see where I'm going
wrong.
The captions bellow are from Man
Salane King wrote:
> The number of stars can be changed in control panel>login manager from no to
> 1 to 3 stars at the users preference.
The console has no stars, so I say nix the stars, or at least obfuscate
them. What we are talking about, though, is the default for the system
when kdebas
The number of stars can be changed in control panel>login manager from no to
1 to 3 stars at the users preference.
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 05:50 pm, you wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2001 13:00:23 -0400, David Walluck wrote:
> > I also would like to see it not echo back any stars when you enter your
> >
On 25 Jul 2001 13:00:23 -0400, David Walluck wrote:
> I also would like to see it not echo back any stars when you enter your
> password. The console has always done this, and no one has complained. I
> am certainly for this option for security reasons, so maybe it should be
> set by the secur
Hello,
I have looked longuely why my serial lonk to my gps was so bad for long
time... I found that gpilotd is run at gnome boot, even if I have
nothing in my panel which has to do with my palm...
Is that normal behaviour?
Unfortunately I have to share my serial link betweem the palm and the
gp
I am seeing a reproducable segfault using the following:
[brian@pc brian]$ rpm -q galeon mozilla
galeon-0.11.3-1mdk
mozilla-0.9.2-7mdk
Trying to go to URL:
https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/ehealthinsurance/benefits/st/Fortis/FortisBenefits.html
The thing about it is that I don't see the same p
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:19:05AM +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
>
> xinit /usr/X11R6/bin/startsawfish (same for other window manager)
Cool!
I can run:
[brian@pc brian]$ xinit /usr/X11R6/bin/startsawfish -- /usr/bin/X11/Xnest :1 -geometry
1590x1110
and it brings up an Xnest with a sawfish en
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>- the case of uid > 500 was just covered I have seen. Good :-)
> >>
> >>
> > do you mean >= 500 because i have uid 500
>
>
> Yes, I beliueve he does. 500 is where the first normal UID starts.
> Therefore mine is 500 as well. And aside from the /sbin/poweroff
> well there is the directory "unsupported" under mandrake-devel
> with 8.0 package updates beyond security updates (unsupported/7.2
> I don't know why it is not mirrored,
> but here it exists).
Where is "here"?
> Certainly updates are provided for some package, and it is
> unsupported. Well,
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>- the case of uid > 500 was just covered I have seen. Good :-)
>>
>>
> do you mean >= 500 because i have uid 500
Yes, I beliueve he does. 500 is where the first normal UID starts.
Therefore mine is 500 as well. And aside from the /sbin/poweroff problem
I mentioned,
On 25 Jul 2001 10:55:06 -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 11:33:35AM -0600, Eaon wrote:
> > You are still missing it. It's not about the operating system, it's about
> > the applications. And YES, Microsoft makes applications that will run on
> > several versions of the O/S - Off
>
> - the case of uid > 500 was just covered I have seen. Good :-)
>
do you mean >= 500 because i have uid 500
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 11:33:35AM -0600, Eaon wrote:
> You are still missing it. It's not about the operating system, it's about
> the applications. And YES, Microsoft makes applications that will run on
> several versions of the O/S - Office (which I understand you don't care for)
> was my exa
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 10:28:45AM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
>
> A while... unfortunately. The problem is that 2.4 is still really new
> so fixes are being introduced all of the time, as are bugs.
Understood.
> I think
> the kernel team is trying to find a happy medium where the kernel is
>
> Well, you bring up a good point, Tim, but I am now convinced that this
> guy is a troll,
Moi? Or the original poster? I'm confused now. All I did was agree with
the original poster, until you started making assumptions about my
livelyhood and/or intelligence. Now I'm the troll?
> and it's
Frederic Lepied wrote:
>
> Could you show us your ~/.xsession-errors ?
>
/usr/share/config/kdm/Xsession: /home/bor/.xsession: No such file or
directory /usr/share/config/kdm/Xsession: exec: /home/bor/.xsession:
cannot execute: No such file or directory
This is due to the lines in /usr/shar
During the bombing raid on Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:55:33 -0400, David Walluck was
heard mumbling in fear:
> François Pons wrote:
>
> > This is "easy", release numbering is not consistent with rpm vision of sorting
> > release (or version).
> >
> > I checked rpmtools version_compare (which do
François Pons wrote:
>
> Idem as above, /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg is compatible with older version too.
It's not mentioned in the help that 'with' is optional. And when I look
at /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg, it appears to need three things in order to
work. Ideally, you'd probably only want to have to s
David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since someone finally seems to be on top of the urpmi problems, the most recent
> Mandrake Community Newsletter (I stopped receiving this by email for some
> reason, but I read it on http://www.linuxtoday.com/) had a review of urpmi vs.
> apt-get.
>
>
>
> So sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]=AB am 2001-07-25 um 18:44:56 -0400 :
> > May i suggest to set X up standard to not listen instead of listening.=20
>
> It is! I didn't fiddle anywhere, and since I don't have X listening,
> I'd say it is.
>
> Alexander Skwar
Did you do netstat -tl
PS. how do i
Laurent MONTEL wrote:
> --=-=-=
> Name: kdebase Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 2.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 0.beta1.5mdk Build Date: Wed Jul 25 11:36:03 2001
> --=-=-=
>
> * Wed Jul 25 2001
François Pons wrote:
> This is "easy", release numbering is not consistent with rpm vision of sorting
> release (or version).
>
> I checked rpmtools version_compare (which do the same as rpmvercmp of rpmlib)
> and it return the first argument as always greater than the second (which is
> absurd)
So sprach »[EMAIL PROTECTED]« am 2001-07-25 um 18:44:56 -0400 :
> May i suggest to set X up standard to not listen instead of listening.
It is! I didn't fiddle anywhere, and since I don't have X listening,
I'd say it is.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http:/
"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --
> Original Message
> From: "Guillaume Cottenceau"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] NFS install fails
> Date: 25 Jul 2001 13:14:13 +0200
>
> >"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Here are the consol
>
> Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> It is standard open for network connection(if you know the magic
> cookie)
> But nmap/netstat will show port 6000 open
>
> >>> Hmm, sure?
> >>>
> >> It is something like xinit -- --no-listen
> >>
> >> PS does anybody know if ssh w
Tim wrote:
>>Dave, Dave, Dave, Dave, Dave. When did this become about what I do for
>>a living? And is it your common resort to tell people who question the
>>way things are done "If your not a developer then fuck off"? But if we
>>must, then I fill you in on a little secret - I'm a Java devel
On Tue Jul 24, 2001 at 07:22:54PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> > It does seem like a silly idea. If it's the third run at getting an RPM
> > updated, it should be -3mdk, not -1.2mdk. Let's leave the dotted
> > versions to the software and not the package attempts.
>
> I actually believe they were
On Tue Jul 24, 2001 at 05:48:52PM -0700, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > This question has been answered long ago and the answer is yes.
>
> I think we all know that answer. Yes starts to be belived as no when
> it doesn't actually get followed up on with action however.
>
> How long has an 8.0 up
So sprach »Steve Fox« am 2001-07-25 um 11:36:52 -0400 :
> Actually the flying fish is an easter egg that wasn't supposed to happen
> as often as it does. It's in menu.c of the panel code.
Shame on you - you destroyed all my conspiracy theories... :)
Thanks a lot!
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quo
Actually the flying fish is an easter egg that wasn't supposed to happen
as often as it does. It's in menu.c of the panel code.
Ximian patches it out, but I'm told that later versions of gnome-core
have changed it so that it's not so easy to happen.
So no worries ;)
--
Steve Fox
http://k-lu
Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>>
>>
It is standard open for network connection(if you know the magic
cookie)
But nmap/netstat will show port 6000 open
>>> Hmm, sure?
>>>
>> It is something like xinit -- --no-listen
>>
>> PS does anybody know if ssh will still work if you disable
--
Original Message
From: "Guillaume Cottenceau"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Cooker] NFS install fails
Date: 25 Jul 2001 13:14:13 +0200
>"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Here are the console dumps.
>>
>> On F4
>> <4>eth0: setting Rx mode to
So sprach »Charles A Edwards« am 2001-07-25 um 10:35:22 -0400 :
> I do not remember the package ofhand but there is one
> that dispays an antimated aquarium as the destop background.
> Perhaps they are spawning.
Question is: Why did a spawn, and why just one time?
Well, there are questions out
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yura Gusev
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] Flying fish???
>
>
> On 24 Jul 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL
Stefan Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems to work, but urpmi still has a bug:
>
> --
> # urpmi fetchmail
> --14:22:45--
>
>ftp://ftp.uni-bayreuth.de/pub/linux/Mandrake/updates/8.0/RPMS/fetchmail-5.7.4-5.1mdk
Mads Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is alot of postings like "dayly install", "latest cooker install" etc.
>
> Beyond this there are the new cooker status emails talking about the latest
> features
>
> As far as I have experienced MDK Freq is cooker somewhat stabilized so why
>
>
> >
> >
> >>>It is standard open for network connection(if you know the magic cookie)
> >>>But nmap/netstat will show port 6000 open
> >>>
> >>Hmm, sure?
> >>
> >It is something like xinit -- --no-listen
> >
> >PS does anybody know if ssh will still work if you disable X to listen
> >
> Yeah, w
There is alot of postings like "dayly install", "latest cooker install" etc.
Beyond this there are the new cooker status emails talking about the latest
features
As far as I have experienced MDK Freq is cooker somewhat stabilized so why
hasn't a new Freq been released?
Why don't you make a f
Am 2001-07-2, um 14:10:51 (+0200) schrieb François Pons:
> > # grep ldconfig /var/lib/urpmi/provides
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ldconfig-2.2.2-4mdk.i586
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ldconfig-2.2.2-4mdk.i586
> >^
>
> This sounds normal for me if
>
>
>>>It is standard open for network connection(if you know the magic cookie)
>>>But nmap/netstat will show port 6000 open
>>>
>>Hmm, sure?
>>
>It is something like xinit -- --no-listen
>
>PS does anybody know if ssh will still work if you disable X to listen
>
Yeah, why not? If you have X11 for
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ainsi parlait François Pons :
> [..]
> > But --auto-select does not run ?
> It works now for me.
>
> > This is sensed to fix this one (and not found bug on local packages too).
> You fix bug you don't find ? Wow, i want a HOWTO :-)
No :-) not found
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
[..]
> But --auto-select does not run ?
It works now for me.
> This is sensed to fix this one (and not found bug on local packages too).
You fix bug you don't find ? Wow, i want a HOWTO :-)
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://bohm.snv.jussieu.fr/
>
> So sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]=AB am 2001-07-24 um 22:52:00 -0400 :
> > It is standard open for network connection(if you know the magic cookie)
> > But nmap/netstat will show port 6000 open
>
> Hmm, sure?
>
It is something like xinit -- --no-listen
PS does anybody know if ssh will still work
>
> So sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]=AB am 2001-07-24 um 22:52:00 -0400 :
> > It is standard open for network connection(if you know the magic cookie)
> > But nmap/netstat will show port 6000 open
>
> Hmm, sure?
nmap 127.0.0.1
..
6000/tcp openX11
netstat -lt
Active Internet connections (
Stefan Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello François,
Hello Stefan,
> Am 2001-07-2, um 13:23:47 (+0200) schrieb François Pons:
> > Ok, 3mdk seems to have correct bahaviour now.
>
> I am sorry, but no change :-\
>
> # rpm -q urpmi
> urpmi-1.7-3mdk
> # urpmi.update -a -f
> [...]
> # ls -l
So sprach »Digital Wokan« am 2001-07-24 um 18:57:54 -0400 :
> It does seem like a silly idea. If it's the third run at getting an RPM
> updated, it should be -3mdk, not -1.2mdk. Let's leave the dotted
> versions to the software and not the package attempts.
Dotted versions are normally just sec
Hello François,
Am 2001-07-2, um 13:23:47 (+0200) schrieb François Pons:
> Ok, 3mdk seems to have correct bahaviour now.
I am sorry, but no change :-\
# rpm -q urpmi
urpmi-1.7-3mdk
# urpmi.update -a -f
[...]
# ls -l /var/lib/urpmi/provides
-rw-r--r--1 root root 284646 Jul 25 13:29 /var/l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes:
> > I am sorry, but same result with your newest "urpmi-1.7-2mdk":
>
> Yes, I saw, partially fixed on some cases only.
>
> I still work on it, expect fix soon (I hope so).
Ok, 3mdk seems to have correct bahaviour now.
François.
"kk1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here are the console dumps.
>
> On F4
> <4>eth0: setting Rx mode to 1 addresses. (sic)
> <4>nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
> <6>isapnp: scanning for PnP cards
> <4>eth0: infinite loop in interrupt, status
> <6>isapnp: Card '3Com 3C509B Ether
Stefan Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, François,
>
> I am sorry, but same result with your newest "urpmi-1.7-2mdk":
Yes, I saw, partially fixed on some cases only.
I still work on it, expect fix soon (I hope so).
François.
Hello, François,
I am sorry, but same result with your newest "urpmi-1.7-2mdk":
# rpm -q urpmi
urpmi-1.7-2mdk
# urpmi.update -a -f
[...]
# ls -l /var/lib/urpmi/provides
-rw-r--r--1 root root 284646 Jul 25 12:30 /var/lib/urpmi/provides
# grep ldconfig /var/lib/urpmi/provides
[EMAIL PROTECT
doesnt work waiting on -2
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 04:35 am, you wrote:
> Salane King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yep same here
> > urpmi-1.7-1mdk
>
> So it doesn't work on some case or it works now ?
>
> François.
Hello, François,
Neulich schrieb François Pons:
> Try rebuilding media, using urpmi.update -a -f if you don't see
> something like :
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> instead of
>rpmtools@rpmtools
> in /var/lib/urpmi/provides
>
> François.
# urpmi.update -a -f
[...]
# ls -l /var/lib/urpmi/provides
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
[..]
> > What's this -f(orce) option not forcing anything :-) ?
>
> It force rebuild of depslist.ordered and other files like provides.
>
> But maybe an inches here as hdlist is up to date.
Well, even removing media and re-adding it doesn't change anything...
I'll try
Ainsi parlait François Pons :
[..]
> Try rebuilding media, using urpmi.update -a -f if you don't see something
> like : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> instead of
>rpmtools@rpmtools
> in /var/lib/urpmi/provides
[root@silbermann guillaume]# cat /var/lib/urpmi/provides | grep rpmtool
perl(rpmtools)@rpmtool
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This morning, just after updating my favorite mirror (sunet.se):
> [root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed
> (1327 MB):
> drakfloppy-0.43-3mdk drakfont-0.58-14mdk r
This morning, just after updating my favorite mirror (sunet.se):
[root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi --auto-select
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed
(1327 MB):
drakfloppy-0.43-3mdk drakfont-0.58-14mdk rpm-devel-4.0.3-0.17mdk
egcs-cpp-1.1.2-49mdk rpm-python-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of François Pons
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Mandrake Cooker Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] evolution: failed deps
>
>
> Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [root@teich root]# urpmi evolution
> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
> installed (10 MB):
> ldconfig-2.2.3-4mdk evolution-0.11-2mdk
> Is it ok? (Y/n) y
> installing
> /COOKER/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/ldconfig-2.2.3-4md
Salane King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep same here
> urpmi-1.7-1mdk
So it doesn't work on some case or it works now ?
François.
Hello,
I've noticed a bit of confusion in the structure of Mandrake folders lately.
I mean that in CONTRIBS we have
SRPMS ok
RPMS and i586 that are the same thing, 650x2 MB
Now in Cooker
RPMS
RPMS2 --> the same of CONTRIBS/RPMS == CONTRIBS/i586
Could someone explain what's the difference in all
67 matches
Mail list logo
