Re: [Cooker] [BUGS] drakxtools-9.2-0.31mdk

2003-08-19 Thread Stew Benedict
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, FACORAT Fabrice wrote: > 1°/ drakbackup > drakbackup crash when selecting a directory to save in Advanced > configuration -> What -> Other . > > msg in console : > Usage: append(list_store) at /usr/sbin/drakbackup line 1685. > Will check it out - thx. > 2°/ drakfont > c

[Cooker] [BUGS] drakxtools-9.2-0.31mdk

2003-08-19 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
1°/ drakbackup drakbackup crash when selecting a directory to save in Advanced configuration -> What -> Other . msg in console : Usage: append(list_store) at /usr/sbin/drakbackup line 1685. 2°/ drakfont can't select a directory via file manager

[Cooker] bugs in drakbackup

2003-06-26 Thread Keld Jørn Simonsen
Hi, I just tried drakbackup and had some problems. I had a limit on the amount of space allocated, I just used the default which was 500 - but no unit. I thought it would be megabytes. Anyway I then started a backup and it filled up my /var file system. So the limit was either not im MBs or not ob

Re: [Cooker] [BUGS] shorewall/drakfirewall/drakconnect

2003-04-03 Thread Steffen Barszus
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2003 12:24 schrieb Florin: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steffen Barszus) writes: > > Hi! > > > > I have tried to start drakfirewall, but this tool simply makes nothing. > > Here the output from commandline: > > > > ]# drakfirewall > > SCALAR(0x8ebcda0) at /usr/lib/libDrakX/network/dra

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-04-01 Thread Leon Brooks
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 08:01, Steffen Barszus wrote: > *No software is bug free* I wouldn't be so sure. Microsoft ship you lots of bugs for free with every copy of Windows. Cheers; Leon

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-04-01 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 07:05 am, Steffen Barszus wrote: > From #mandrake on irc.freenode.net it looks like the big 9.1 support issue > > > is going to be the installer. It doesn't seem to work well with SMP or > > users like me who want to jump back and fix things cause we forgot which > > box we

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-04-01 Thread Murray J. Root
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:05:53PM +0200, Steffen Barszus wrote: > On Tuesday 01 April 2003 13:22, Murray J. Root wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:45:00AM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 18:38, Leon Brooks wrote: > > > > On Monday 31 March 2003 05:49, Toran Korshnah

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-04-01 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 13:22, Murray J. Root wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:45:00AM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 18:38, Leon Brooks wrote: > > > On Monday 31 March 2003 05:49, Toran Korshnah wrote: > > > > I read the 9.2 thread and I begin to wonder if 9.1 is a go

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-04-01 Thread Murray J. Root
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:45:00AM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote: > On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 18:38, Leon Brooks wrote: > > On Monday 31 March 2003 05:49, Toran Korshnah wrote: > > > I read the 9.2 thread and I begin to wonder if 9.1 is a good release. > > > Are there really so many bugs? > > > > Not

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-04-01 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 18:38, Leon Brooks wrote: > On Monday 31 March 2003 05:49, Toran Korshnah wrote: > > I read the 9.2 thread and I begin to wonder if 9.1 is a good release. > > Are there really so many bugs? > > Not so far. Most of the people reporting on my LUG list are delighted with it. >

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-03-31 Thread Leon Brooks
On Monday 31 March 2003 05:49, Toran Korshnah wrote: > I read the 9.2 thread and I begin to wonder if 9.1 is a good release. > Are there really so many bugs? Not so far. Most of the people reporting on my LUG list are delighted with it. Specifically, a few of them are crowing about stuff that was

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-03-31 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Sunday 30 March 2003 23:49, Toran Korshnah wrote: > Hi, > > I read the 9.2 thread and I begin to wonder if 9.1 is a good release. > Are there really so many bugs? > I expect really 9.1 to be better than 9.0... > It is better. I think we think about how could mandrake improve ;) *No software is

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-03-31 Thread Eric Fernandez
From: "Toran Korshnah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 10:49 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2) > > Hi, > > I read the 9.2 thread and I begin to wonder if 9.1 is a good release. > Are there really so m

Re: [Cooker] bugs (wish list for 9.2)

2003-03-31 Thread Toran Korshnah
Hi, I read the 9.2 thread and I begin to wonder if 9.1 is a good release. Are there really so many bugs? I expect really 9.1 to be better than 9.0... BB, Toran

[Cooker] Bugs 317 1268 1801 2504 2562 3546 3345 3562

2003-03-31 Thread Steffen Barszus
Hi! I feel that Bugs 317 1268 1801 2504 2562 3546 3345 3562 are all the same issue. I haven't found yet a solution for it. All are related to Promise Fasttrack (PDC Controller) Solution is given in 1268 and I think 1801 (??). Can this be solved by an alternate bootdisk, a driver , sth other ?

[Cooker] bugs marked "LATER"

2003-03-29 Thread Michael Reinsch
Hi! What about the bugs which are marked as RESOLVED LATER or RESOLVED REMIND? Are they reopened now after the 9.1 release so they are not forgotten? -- Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mr.uue.org -

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-13 Thread Jesse Wagner
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:54:31 +0200, "Buchan Milne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:36, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > So you want to add an entirely unnecessary extra back-out stage purely > > to save

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 10:54, Buchan Milne wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:36, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > So you want to add an entirely unnecessary extra back-out stage purely > > to save the probably suicidally stup

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-13 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:36, Buchan Milne wrote: > > So you want to add an entirely unnecessary extra back-out stage purely > to save the probably suicidally stupid luser who would select > OpenSymbol, see in the preview box th

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 17:40, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:36, Buchan Milne wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2003, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 22:42, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > > > > > As I said, I have not tested this, but what happens if you change the

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Jesse Wagner
On 13 Mar 2003 01:40:23 +, "Adam Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:36, Buchan Milne wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2003, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 22:42, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > > > > > As I said, I have not tested this, but what happ

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:36, Buchan Milne wrote: > On Thu, 12 Mar 2003, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 22:42, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > > > As I said, I have not tested this, but what happens if you change the > > > default application fonts (which I assume gnome-font-prope

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Buchan Milne
On Thu, 12 Mar 2003, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 22:42, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > As I said, I have not tested this, but what happens if you change the > > default application fonts (which I assume gnome-font-properties uses in > > it's dialog) to be something unreadable (s

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 22:42, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > "Nuke"? How? What changes can you make to fonts in any GNOME > > configuration dialog that aren't easily reversible simply by reverting > > to the previous settings of the options you changed? > > > > As I said, I have not tested this, but

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Buchan Milne
> > "Nuke"? How? What changes can you make to fonts in any GNOME > configuration dialog that aren't easily reversible simply by reverting > to the previous settings of the options you changed? > As I said, I have not tested this, but what happens if you change the default application fonts (whi

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 21:35, Buchan Milne wrote: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > > Hi Buchan, > > > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > > Sorry, but I really don't think a single "Close" button is better than > > > Apply/Cancel/OK combo. > > > > > > It's lik

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Buchan Milne
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > Hi Buchan, > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > Sorry, but I really don't think a single "Close" button is better than > > Apply/Cancel/OK combo. > > > > It's like making a nuke with only a "Fire" button, and no abort ... > > Nowh

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Reinout van Schouwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > Can you sum up why you posted this link, why does it follow what > > buchan was saying? > > A lot of thought has gone into the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines. Which > is not to say it is p

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in 9.1 RC2

2003-03-12 Thread John Keller
Adam Flinton wrote: > Other than that...so far so good. Does anyone know if Mozilla 1.3 is > going to make it before 9.1 goes final? Already in there, and even went through a bug fix. You can get it off of Cooker right now, or wait until the final. Happy browsing...

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Reinout van Schouwen
Hi Buchan, On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: > Sorry, but I really don't think a single "Close" button is better than > Apply/Cancel/OK combo. > > It's like making a nuke with only a "Fire" button, and no abort ... Nowhere did I say that a 'Revert' functionality isn't in order in some cri

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-12 Thread Reinout van Schouwen
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Can you sum up why you posted this link, why does it follow what > buchan was saying? A lot of thought has gone into the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines. Which is not to say it is perfect, but a gross generalization like "really bad UI" for a gu

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in 9.1 RC2

2003-03-12 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Flinton wrote: > > 2.1) On the KDE3.1 desktop (but not any of the others (e.g. GNOME2.2)) > it has 3 icons for 3 "Desktop Config Files" called: > > dynamicProcessing > dynamicProbing > dynamicAdding > > They are on my desktop but are owned by root

[Cooker] Bugs in 9.1 RC2

2003-03-12 Thread Adam Flinton
Dear All, Found some bugs in RC 2. Do I send em in here to the mailing list or shove em through the qa system? Quick list (maybe someone can help here): It was an upgrade from 9.0 (Dolphin) 1) During upgrade: When it got to the hardware etc screen (after the pacages had been upgraded) it sai

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-11 Thread John Keller
James Sparenberg wrote: > > The average person does not press a Save button after turning the volume > > knob on his stereo. If he'd be wondering whether his computer settings are > > going to be saved or not, then he has been mentally mutilated by > > incompetent software designers, and should be

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:04, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, obennett wrote: > > > > else, is that it uses instant-apply where possible. So the changes have > > > already been effectuated before closing the window. > > the average person doesn't know this so having "Clo

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: > > >>Which means if you made a mistake, you can't just choose cancel (or hit >>ESC), you have to remember what setting you had before, and set it back >>to that. Really bad UI IMHO

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Reinout van Schouwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > Which means if you made a mistake, you can't just choose cancel (or hit > > ESC), you have to remember what setting you had before, and set it back > > to that. Really bad UI IMHO. Expect users to ma

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread Reinout van Schouwen
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: > Which means if you made a mistake, you can't just choose cancel (or hit > ESC), you have to remember what setting you had before, and set it back > to that. Really bad UI IMHO. Expect users to make mistakes often, and > make it easy for them to recover fr

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread Reinout van Schouwen
Hi, On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, obennett wrote: > > else, is that it uses instant-apply where possible. So the changes have > > already been effectuated before closing the window. > the average person doesn't know this so having "Close" might cause them > to just stare wondering if their settings are go

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread obennett
On Monday 10 March 2003 7:35 am, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, obennett wrote: > > I think that would be a good fix but "Save" rather than "Close" (as > > gnome does) would be more appropriate here as it explains to the lay > > user exactly what is/has been done. > > Not really.

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread John Keller
Buchan Milne wrote: > > Not really. The reason that GNOME uses 'Close' and not 'Save' or something > > else, is that it uses instant-apply where possible. So the changes have > > already been effectuated before closing the window. > > > > Which means if you made a mistake, you can't just choose can

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, obennett wrote: > > > > > >>I think that would be a good fix but "Save" rather than "Close" (as > >>gnome does) would be more appropriate here as it explains to the lay > >>user exactly what is/has been

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, obennett wrote: > > >>I think that would be a good fix but "Save" rather than "Close" (as >>gnome does) would be more appropriate here as it explains to the lay >>user exactly what is/has been done. > >

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-10 Thread Reinout van Schouwen
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, obennett wrote: > I think that would be a good fix but "Save" rather than "Close" (as > gnome does) would be more appropriate here as it explains to the lay > user exactly what is/has been done. Not really. The reason that GNOME uses 'Close' and not 'Save' or something else, i

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
obennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > May I suggest taking a page out of the Mac's (and now Gnome's) > >book? Simply have a single, "Close" button. > > I think that would be a good fix but "Save" rather than "Close" > (as gnome does) would be more appropriate here as it explains to > the lay u

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-07 Thread obennett
On Friday 07 March 2003 7:24 am, John Keller wrote: > Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > Actually "save & quit" concerns only the changes in the > > "activated" checkboxes. "Immediately" canceling the rest would > > not be easy because each real action (add/modify/remove) is > > actually done by urpmi

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-07 Thread obennett
On Friday 07 March 2003 7:11 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Please use *meaningful* Subject: line in your emails or else it's > very difficult to guess if your email concerns me or not. Point taken. I wasn't really posting this as a bug report though it was more a commentary on little niggling

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-07 Thread John Keller
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > Beyond that, there is the possibility to link the "remove" button, at least, > > to the "save" ability. Rather than remove the source when the user clicks > > the button, remove it (or not) upon exit. Because "removed" sources stop > > showing up, you can be certain

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"John Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > May I suggest taking a page out of the Mac's (and now Gnome's) book? Simply > have a single, "Close" button. > > The activation checkboxes are nondestructive in nature. Confirmation of > saving their state isn't very important, especially considering th

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-07 Thread John Keller
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Actually "save & quit" concerns only the changes in the > "activated" checkboxes. "Immediately" canceling the rest would > not be easy because each real action (add/modify/remove) is > actually done by urpmi. The good fix would be to rename the > buttons but I don't h

Re: [Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-07 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Please use *meaningful* Subject: line in your emails or else it's very difficult to guess if your email concerns me or not. > First off in the software sources manager, whenever you remove a source and > then quit (not save & quit), your changes are saved anyway. This is a real > pain in the @$$

[Cooker] bugs i've found so far

2003-03-05 Thread jokerman64
nothing serious just a few annoyances that you may want to take a look at. First off in the software sources manager, whenever you remove a source and then quit (not save & quit), your changes are saved anyway. This is a real pain in the @$$ if say, you accidentally deleted the entry for CD1 or

Re: [Cooker] Is this the place to post cooker bugs?

2003-01-07 Thread Austin Acton
Seems hard to believe that error. If you're just doing rpm -ba it won't make ANY difference what processor you're using. It will build for i586 (unless you have altered the .rpmrc file). In fact, from your post, it looks like you were building i586-mandrake-linux-gnu. So the error shouldn't be c

[Cooker] Is this the place to post cooker bugs?

2003-01-07 Thread Dean S. Messing
I posted a (possible) cooker bug here yesterday. The bug appears in the build process for gcc-3.2.1 on my athlon machine. It's entitled: [Cooker] Bug in gcc-3.2.1 .src.rpm build and can be found here: http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/archives/cooker/2003-01/msg00286.php I have seen no remarks,

Re: [Cooker] bugs / question about latest drakxtools

2002-11-10 Thread Pixel
JC Pollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > drakfloppy doesn't start : > > same problem with printerdrak: > > root@jc ~# printerdrake > Undefined subroutine &main::N called at /usr/sbin/printerdrake line 57. > well... fixing! and uploading again

Re: [Cooker] bugs / question about latest drakxtools

2002-11-10 Thread JC Pollman
same problem with printerdrak: root@jc ~# printerdrake Undefined subroutine &main::N called at /usr/sbin/printerdrake line 57. JC drakfloppy doesn't start : [root@portable cosmicflo]# drakfloppy Name "main::in" used only once: possible typo at /usr/sbin/drakfloppy line 61. Undefined subrout

[Cooker] bugs / question about latest drakxtools

2002-11-10 Thread Florent BERANGER
drakfloppy doesn't start : [root@portable cosmicflo]# drakfloppy Name "main::in" used only once: possible typo at /usr/sbin/drakfloppy line 61. Undefined subroutine &main::N called at /usr/sbin/drakfloppy line 68. Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in aRts and Brahms

2002-10-11 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:20:59 +0200 Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you follow the Cooker development you can check if the problem > still appears with the new beta version of arts. Tried it. The problem exists there as well. Charles --- All vacations an

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in aRts and Brahms

2002-10-11 Thread Götz Waschk
Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2002, 17:49:44 Uhr MET, schrieb Denix 13: > I am still waiting from an answer from authors or aRts and Brahms... > > But aRts is in the main distribution, spreaded in at least > four packages: > -- arts-1.0.3-7mdk > -- libarts-1.0.3-7mdk > -- libarts-devel-1.0.3-7mdk > --

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in aRts and Brahms

2002-10-11 Thread Denix 13
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 02:58:26 -0700 Randy wrote: > Denix 13 wrote: >> Hi there, >> It's been a long time since I last saw a post dealing with Brahms. Has >> any of you folks been able to *use* it? > [snip] >> The URL is: >> >> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/denix13/Brahms/brahmsbug.html >> >> Here

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in aRts and Brahms

2002-10-10 Thread Randy
Denix 13 wrote: > Hi there, > > It's been a long time since I last saw a post dealing with Brahms. Has > any of you folks been able to *use* it? [snip] > The URL is: > > http://perso.wanadoo.fr/denix13/Brahms/brahmsbug.html > > Here are the bare facts: Your great bug report is refreshing. I

[Cooker] Bugs in aRts and Brahms

2002-10-09 Thread Denix 13
Hi there, It's been a long time since I last saw a post dealing with Brahms. Has any of you folks been able to *use* it? I didn't. After having spent hours and hours trying to get it to work, I have written a bug report. In order not to clutter the list with a lot of computer generat

[Cooker] Bugs in ML 9.0 part 1: network

2002-09-30 Thread Dirk Egert
Hello, during the last 3 days I've installed LM 9.0 on 4 machines. On three PC's it was an update from LM 8.2 to 9.0 and one fresh install. I found some bugs which in my opinion can exist in a beta version of a distribution but not on a final one. I've split the problems into sections. - static

[Cooker] [BUGS] pdf2dsc not working and so kghostview

2002-07-30 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
If I try to see a pdf with kghostview, nothing will be displayed. I finally find why. pdf2dsc seems to have problems [will@bastard will]$ pdf2dsc --help Error: /undefinedfilename in --file-- Operand stack: PDFfile (--help) (r) Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-

Re: [Cooker] BUGS

2001-12-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Yura Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In IceWM if i use any theme menu buttom is still same. Please use a relevant subject for your mails.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] BUGS

2001-12-07 Thread Yura Gusev
In IceWM if i use any theme menu buttom is still same. During today cooker installation i fount one more bug. There is cool mouse testing thingy but if i use russian(koi8-r) installation it didn't showed up. One more thing in kde you can't rename items in the desktop.(Ex create new folder move ico

[Cooker] Bugs in Beta3

2001-09-16 Thread Dominik Bittl
Good morning ! I've found some Bugs in Beta3 while installation(German/Expert)but I'm not sure, if they are already known ...: -general: a.the system didnt reboot at the end of the installation, it hang at "unmounting filesystem /tmp/stage2" ! - draknet: a. you can't see the courser, wh

Re: minimum install (was: Re: [Cooker] Bugs in mandrake-8.0)

2001-08-05 Thread Harry
On 8/3/01 10:25 AM, "Christian Bricart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes :-) I know .. I do it all the time :-) > and I really miss a "unselect all" button :-) And I certainly miss a 'select all' button, which would be highly useful - particularly since the latest (8.0) set of default server ins

minimum install (was: Re: [Cooker] Bugs in mandrake-8.0)

2001-08-03 Thread Christian Bricart

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in drakxtools

2001-04-30 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > I tried to configure connection sharing but it complained that there was a > problem installing iptables, I have no idea what the problem was as there > were no details given. Me neither, I test the binary and it is not here. Can you "rpm -V ip

[Cooker] Bugs in Installer

2001-04-29 Thread Fergal Daly
Here are some problems I found and also one or two feature suggestions Installer - upgrade and install: Removable media - I have a sparq removable IDE drive and I had to insert a cartrige in it before I could get to the disk partitioning section. It was complaining something like "Couldn't eve

[Cooker] Bugs in drakxtools

2001-04-29 Thread Fergal Daly
All this was done as root: When configuring a connection through the control centre, it strips alpha characters from the phone number. I and many other people need to be able to put "W"s in our dial strings to instruct the modem to wait for a second dial tone and continue dialling. I didn't try p

Re: [Cooker] Bugs? RPMDrake, Evolution, Nautilus and Mozilla

2001-04-02 Thread Frederic Crozat
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Giles Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > I have upgraded my system to the latest Nautilus and Mozilla RPMs and I > am still having problems launching Mozilla independently of the Nautilus > browser. > > My RPM versions are > > mozilla 0.8.1-2mdk > mozil

Re: [Cooker] Bugs?... forgot to mention

2001-04-01 Thread Giles Hamlin
Chris Wenny wrote: > I think if you enable "do not distinguish between windows" from the > control-panel's feedback menu, you dont have to put NO_XALF.. > > =Spike= > > > > > Thanks so what's with all this NO-XALF business?

Re: [Cooker] Bugs?... forgot to mention

2001-04-01 Thread Chris Wenny
I think if you enable "do not distinguish between windows" from the control-panel's feedback menu, you dont have to put NO_XALF.. =Spike=

Re: [Cooker] Bugs? RPMDrake, Evolution, Nautilus and Mozilla

2001-04-01 Thread Chris Wenny
Giles Hamlin wrote: > Frederic Crozat wrote: > > > Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Giles Hamlin" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a $B>-%"(Bcrit : > > > >> Mozilla + Nautilus > >> Since installing the Mozilla in Nautilus RPM, I cannot get Mozilla > >> to > >> open on it's own in a Gnome session, ot

Re: [Cooker] Bugs? RPMDrake, Evolution, Nautilus and Mozilla

2001-04-01 Thread Giles Hamlin
Frederic Crozat wrote: 99n2ip$2k1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED]"><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Giles Hamlin"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Mozilla + NautilusSince installing the Mozilla in Nautilus RPM, I cannot get Mozilla toopen on it's own in a Gnome session, other than from wit

Re: [Cooker] Bugs? RPMDrake, Evolution, Nautilus and Mozilla

2001-03-27 Thread Giles Hamlin
Frederic Crozat wrote: > Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Giles Hamlin" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > Could you try : > -logout > -login as user in text mode > -run oaf-slay > -logout and login as user in graphics mode > > test again :)) Okay, this is where I start to look dumb...

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in Pan and Xine

2001-03-26 Thread Marcel Pol
On 26-Mar-01 Giles Hamlin wrote: > Alex Hulse wrote: >> Pan 0.95 that comes with 8beta2 just plain doesn't work - when you run >> it, it >> sits and stares at you without producing a window. Installing the RPM >> from pan's site, it runs fine. Odd. > > Pan worked great here - it even brought up

Re: [Cooker] Bugs? RPMDrake, Evolution, Nautilus and Mozilla

2001-03-26 Thread Frederic Crozat
Dans l'article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Giles Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Mozilla + Nautilus > Since installing the Mozilla in Nautilus RPM, I cannot get Mozilla to > open on it's own in a Gnome session, other than from within a Nautilus > window. Is this the way it's supposed to work? T

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in Pan and Xine

2001-03-26 Thread Blue Lizard
Pan works fine here as well. On 26 Mar 2001 02:06:34 +0100, Giles Hamlin wrote: > > > Alex Hulse wrote: > > > Pan 0.95 that comes with 8beta2 just plain doesn't work - when you run it, it > > sits and stares at you without producing a window. Installing the RPM from > > pan's site, it runs f

Re: [Cooker] Bugs in Pan and Xine

2001-03-25 Thread Giles Hamlin
Alex Hulse wrote: > Pan 0.95 that comes with 8beta2 just plain doesn't work - when you run it, it > sits and stares at you without producing a window. Installing the RPM from > pan's site, it runs fine. Odd. Pan worked great here - it even brought up a window telling me to delete my exisiti

[Cooker] Bugs in Pan and Xine

2001-03-25 Thread Alex Hulse
Pan 0.95 that comes with 8beta2 just plain doesn't work - when you run it, it sits and stares at you without producing a window. Installing the RPM from pan's site, it runs fine. Odd. When attempting to ./configure the xine 0.401 package, it whines about imlib, even though I have it installed,

[Cooker] Bugs in Beta 1

2001-03-24 Thread Kritifile
I don't know how many of these have been fixed in beta 2, as I'm waiting for the CD to be delivered (slow modem connection makes downloading iso images impractical). Here are the beta 1 bugs I've found so far, and some are biggies. I know that some of them have been reported for beta 2, but haven'

[Cooker] Bugs? RPMDrake, Evolution, Nautilus and Mozilla

2001-03-24 Thread Giles Hamlin
Hi Just thought I'd post up a few of my latest experiences with cooker beta 2. If anyone could either confirm these as bugs or 'features' and let me know of any work arounds I'd be very grateful. RPMDrake 1.3-21mdk I deleted all sources except for cdrom1 and cdrom2 and then added a security

Re: [Cooker] Bugs galore in Linux Mandrake 7.2

2000-11-01 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > by hitting CTRL-Z at the appropriate time. However, once installed I > > still have to insert modules manually to get them to work as the USB > > script doesn't even manage to initialise my USB system. This was also a > > problem for Mandrake 7.1 and Cooker w

Re: [Cooker] Bugs galore in Linux Mandrake 7.2

2000-11-01 Thread Pixel
Karl Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > by hitting CTRL-Z at the appropriate time. However, once installed I > still have to insert modules manually to get them to work as the USB > script doesn't even manage to initialise my USB system. This was also a > problem for Mandrake 7.1 and Cooker w

[Cooker] Bugs galore in Linux Mandrake 7.2

2000-11-01 Thread Karl Mitchell
Hi, I've just upgraded from 7.1 to 7.2, having tried out a few of the betas before. It looks like some bugs have crept in during the conversion from cooker to full release, so I thought I'd report them here. Firstly, Netscape doesn't start for normal users if Mandrake 7.1 nsmail and .netscape di

Re: [Cooker] Bugs I've found; supermount in kde 2.0; mitsumi cd-rom humor.

2000-10-27 Thread Vox
During the bombing raid of Fri, 27 Oct 2000 00:29:48 CDT, somebody heard Alaric Ravenhall mumble in fear: > Anyway, I have had a problem with cd-rom and floppy drives after creating > them with the kde2.0 create new devices menu. I put in a data cd and I can > access the drive with the icon

Re: [Cooker] Bugs I've found; supermount in kde 2.0; mitsumi cd-rom humor.

2000-10-27 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Alaric Ravenhall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > I put in a data cd and I can access the drive with the icon. I put in a > music cd, it says "you do not have the right to access this drive." Of > course, I checked permissions. I tried it logged on as root. no go. I > gave my user and grou

Re: [Cooker] Bugs I've found; supermount in kde 2.0; mitsumi cd-rom humor.

2000-10-27 Thread pgeorges
Alaric Ravenhall a écrit : > Anyway, I have had a problem with cd-rom and floppy drives after creating > them with the kde2.0 create new devices menu. I put in a data cd and I can > access the drive with the icon. I put in a music cd, it says "you do not > have the right to access this drive." O

[Cooker] Bugs I've found; supermount in kde 2.0; mitsumi cd-rom humor.

2000-10-26 Thread Alaric Ravenhall
Hi. I'm new to this message list and relatively new to mandrake, but I've worked with unix in the past. I am probably not as great at programming or sysadmin as the others here, but I'll learn. I'll try not to ask too many ID10T error questions. I have been using MD 7.0 & 7.1 with great joy. I

[Cooker] bugs in new kde-2

2000-10-26 Thread Pawel Jablonski
1. kdemultimedia needs libXaw.so.7 (from XFree-4-libs - probably), so if you have older graphic card and XFree-libs-3.3.6, (libXaw.so.6) you can't install kdemultimedia without 2.Some icons in mandrake menu (for example kdegames) are too large. 3. Conversion mandrake menu from iso-8859-2 to u

[Cooker] Bugs in menu and right clicking

2000-09-12 Thread pgeorges
1. Opening kfm, and right click -> create new file from template -> can't find /usr/share/templates/.source/TextFile.txt And indeed I can't find it in any package. 2. After the upgrade of KDE, I get 4 instances of 'home directory' shortcuts in the K menu. My config : - rpm -qa | grep kde

Re: [Cooker] Bugs I've seen in 7.2b

2000-09-10 Thread Pixel
Michael Stucki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > - Perhaps it's not a bug, but I've seen that the standard security for a > workstation is now "low". In LM 7.1 it was "medium". I think this would > be much better... it was already low in 7.1 + workstation ! [...] > - When selecting KDE-pack

Re: [Cooker] Bugs I've seen in 7.2b

2000-09-10 Thread Warly
Michael Stucki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > - When I choose the mouse (it's an MS IntelliMouse, ps/2) and press > next, the mouse disappears. I think it's not needed that the working > driver (standard mouse) will be replaced while setup. LM7.1 did this > without any problems. move the wheel

[Cooker] Bugs I've seen in 7.2b

2000-09-09 Thread Michael Stucki
Hi all, I recently got LM7.2 beta. Here are the problems and bugs I have reported during setup: (Everything was seen during "Expert" mode) Important bugs: - Perhaps it's not a bug, but I've seen that the standard security for a workstation is now "low". In LM 7.1 it was "medium". I

Re: [Cooker] bugs bugs bugs

2000-09-07 Thread Ralph
On Fri, 08 Sep 2000, you wrote: > Just wanted to report some problems. I'm not sure whats going on but > Control Center in kde2 is mandrake beta release is still crashing on signal > 11 I'm getting the same message with kpackage and some other stuff also.

[Cooker] bugs bugs bugs

2000-09-07 Thread michael nazaroff
Just wanted to report some problems. I'm not sure whats going on but Control Center in kde2 is mandrake beta release is still crashing on signal 11, is this a problem for me or anyone else. Another problem is anyone else have trouble with the kernel being unable to mount a scsi harddrive set

Re: [Cooker] bugs?

2000-09-07 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu Sep 07, 2000 at 08:29:11AM -0400, Rodrigo wrote: > > At what did you think when you wrote "it doesn't work"? What is wrong? > > I tried using the Sawfish config tool inside the GNOME control panel, but > none of the options (positioning, resizing, etc.) display a thing, it just > hangs th

  1   2   >