SNF 8.2 is still in the cooker tree and causes gendistrib to fail
due to newt requirements.
I thought SNF was phased out...
--
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Love lies in pools of questions.
GPG Key Fingerprint: 354C 7A02 77C5 9EE7 8538 4E8D DCD9 B4B0 DC35 67CD
Levi Ramsey wrote:
SNF 8.2 is still in the cooker tree and causes gendistrib to fail
due to newt requirements.
I thought SNF was phased out...
SNF is, but the snf packages is just the lead in to install the pieces
required for the MNF.
Which at some point should actually be released in
Norman Carver wrote:
I have a number of machines with 1.5-2GB of ram on them, and have been
running the Enterprise (himem) kernels on them (starting with MDK 8.0).
We have had no problems that I would blame on the Enterprise kernels.
In fact, the only problems we have had were memory corruption
Peter Magnusson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
without highmem:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:904940 185524 719416 0 84
I have a number of machines with 1.5-2GB of ram on them, and have been
running the Enterprise (himem) kernels on them (starting with MDK 8.0).
We have had no problems that I would blame on the Enterprise kernels.
In fact, the only problems we have had were memory corruption problems with
MDK 8.2,
spontaneous reboots - replaced with 400W).
Bill Shirley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:cooker-owner;linux-mandrake.com]On Behalf Of Norman Carver
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2, 1024 MB RAM
I have
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, andre wrote:
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 16:18, Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
highmem is slower than standard so i am not for it. Besides there are other
How much
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Buchan Milne wrote:
No, he wants all machines (including my P133/32MB box which just runs a
firewall) to have the overhead of highmem, just so that weird issues ( I
Fine, so install both kernels at install if the installer sees more than
1024 MB RAM. It will be more and
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
Isnt highmem the only choice if i want to use 1024 MB RAM?
I think it would be great if MDK could do a highmem kernel also, not
just SMP + HIGHMEM kernel.
btw. do you really
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
without highmem:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:904940 185524 719416 0 84 107520
-/+
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 21:35, Peter Magnusson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
without highmem:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:904940
andre wrote:
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 22:59, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
some of the posts last month, several people had problems with the
highmem kernels.
btw. do you really need the highmem kernel for 1024 MB ram? I
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
I tried this:
[rootgauss root]# rpm -ivh kernel-enterprise-2.4.18.6mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...###
[100%]
Peter Magnusson wrote:
What exactly is the difference between the enterprise kernel and the
normal kernel? Only highmem?
High mem and SMP AFAIK. It does say what the differences are during the
installation process. Might be a little bit too late for your but FYI.
-Larry
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
There was an error when generating initrd try to do a :
/sbin/mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.4.18-6mdkenterprise.img 2.4.18-6mdkenterprise
and
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 16:18, Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
highmem is slower than standard so i am not for it. Besides there are other
patchs in the case of memory2GB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter Magnusson wrote:
|
|
|I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
|compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
|
|
|There was an error when generating initrd try to do a :
Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
I tried this:
[rootgauss root]# rpm -ivh kernel-enterprise-2.4.18.6mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...###
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 22:59, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
some of the posts last month, several people had problems with the
highmem kernels.
btw. do you really need the highmem kernel for 1024 MB ram? I thought
that the
Hi There,
I know this is not the place to ask the question, but I just
want to know what I have to do by the network configuration of mandrake.
Ive got two NIC with the following wanted
configuration:
Eth0: my internal interface
IP: 192.168.1.1
NETMASK: 255.255.255.0
Eth1: my
Menno Vanderlist wrote on Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:00:50AM -0600 :
Hi There,
I know this is not the place to ask the question, but I just want to
You are correct. The place to ask this question is in the Mandrake
Expert mailing list. This is the Mandrake Cooker mailing list which is
where
Menno Vanderlist wrote:
Hi There,
I know this is not the place to ask the question, but I just want to
know what I have to do by the network configuration of mandrake.
Ive got two NIC with the following wanted configuration:
Eth0: my internal interface
IP: 192.168.1.1
I've actually been looking for the name of that simple firewall
wizard package since I reinstalled Mandrake 8.2 (really not the OS's
fault, I had a family member decide it was a good idea to unplug the
server between the box and it's UPS which resulted in the HDD spraying
garbage all
On Friday August 16 2002 05:21 am, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
I've actually been looking for the name of that simple firewall
wizard package since I reinstalled Mandrake 8.2 (really not the
OS's fault, I had a family member decide it was a good idea to
unplug the server between the box and
Sorry to dredge this up but as Mandrake 9 is still in beta I'm reminded of
few points in theregister review of Mandrake 8.2
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25160.html).
In it the reviewer which mentioned how a reinstallation was necessary
after a failed kernel compile. I had my own
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:34:53AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
Sorry to dredge this up but as Mandrake 9 is still in beta I'm reminded of
few points in theregister review of Mandrake 8.2
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25160.html).
In it the reviewer which mentioned how a
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 09:59, Ben Reser wrote:
If this has changed in 9 then my apologies but in 8.2 the entries in
lilo.conf for the mandrake kernels all used the vmlinuz symlink which is
libel to change if a new (non mandrake kernel) is compiled thus causing
grief if this kernel
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:34:53AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
Sorry to dredge this up but as Mandrake 9 is still in beta I'm
reminded of few points in theregister review of Mandrake 8.2
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25160.html).
In it the reviewer which mentioned how a
1. Huh ?
There is a way to make your own kernel according to some
mandrake concept of what you're supposed to do ?
2. I have always gone and done everything after getting kernel
source, lilo, System.map, etc., etc., etc.,
Like, I do hereby assume full responsibility...
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 12:02:58PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
Um...but kernel upgrades change lilo.conf *anyway*. (They put a
specifically directed entry for themselves, labelled with their kernel
version and revision number, at the bottom of the menu - e.g. 2419-1 ,
pointing to
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 09:26, allen wrote:
1. Huh ?
There is a way to make your own kernel according to some
mandrake concept of what you're supposed to do ?
2. I have always gone and done everything after getting kernel
source, lilo, System.map, etc., etc., etc.,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've actually been looking for the name of that simple firewall
wizard package since I reinstalled Mandrake 8.2 (really not the OS's
fault, I had a family member decide it was a good idea to unplug the
server between the box and it's UPS which
snf?
--- Richard G. Houser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've actually been looking for the name of that
simple firewall
wizard package since I reinstalled Mandrake 8.2
(really not the OS's
fault, I had a family member decide it was a good
idea to unplug the
server between the box and it's
David Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a general question about upgrading from MDK 8.2 to 9.0. Is is possible
to do an upgrade package-by-package manually? I tried doing this from 8.1-8.2
but I had lots of libpng dependancy problems, so I did a clean install. I could
just do the
Hi,
I have a general question about upgrading from MDK 8.2 to 9.0. Is is
possible to do an upgrade package-by-package manually? I tried doing
this from 8.1-8.2 but I had lots of libpng dependancy problems, so I
did a clean install. I could just do the upgrade option in the
installer but I
Was there any fundamental change to the configuration of the serial
ports in the shift to the /dev/tts/0 devices which might explain why
gphoto2 support for the Kodak DC3200 (serial) digital camera is now
broken?
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] TeleDynamics Communications Inc
I installed 8.2(With X, with docs, nothing more) today and i found on bug
in updated packages. Description of dhcpd-client is very strange, i can
see some script messages there (if [-x /sbin/dhcpd...). I think it is
better to fix it ASAP because no one will install such a buggly upgrade
but
I've upgraded a mdk 8.1 to a 8.2 and when I change my video card, kudzu
does nothing (tried a lot of video cards), and X11 is left unconfigured.
I've downloaded the mdk sources of kudzu and I found the bug:
- kudzu has been patched (by mdk) to run XFdrake instead of Xconfiguration,
- BUT,
Have you tried kernel-secure, or an older kernel (for example the one
provided with 8.0) ?
Try to disable DMA in /etc/sysconfig/harddisk* (as suggested by John
Allen).
oh..yes. old kernel is okay. mdk 8.1 is ok (sorry not try mdk 8.0)
red-hat 7.2 is okay. red-hat 7.3 is okay.
DMA
I had similar problems with 8.1 too, so now i'm back to 8.0 kernel and
everything works fine.
What about the DMA change, do you need the latest kernel ?
Stef
Le Mercredi 29 Mai 2002 09:49, vous avez ?crit :
Have you tried kernel-secure, or an older kernel (for example the one
provided with
i don't know if the original 8.1 kernel is okay, but the
updated kernel pass my testing..
and about DMA, only cdrom using ide DMA, so it seems not very
important to me.
just disable it and don't let it crsah my server:)
I had similar problems with 8.1 too, so now i'm back to 8.0
Hi!
Is the ProSuite edtion of Mandrake Linux 8.2 supposed to be freely
downloadable? I've found ISOs for the two CDs on some mirrors, for
example on
ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/os/linux/mandrake/Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-8.2-Prosuite-Download-CD1.i586.iso
Thanks,
Alexander Skwar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 29 Mai 2002 13:08, Alexander Skwar a écrit :
Hi!
Is the ProSuite edtion of Mandrake Linux 8.2 supposed to be freely
downloadable? I've found ISOs for the two CDs on some mirrors, for
example on
So sprach Olivier Thauvin am 2002-05-29 um 19:39:47 +0200 :
My mirror contain only two Cd for this version, I think it is normal things.
Why include games and mp3 reader on a distrib dedicated for server ?
dedicated for server?
It is not the full prosuite, only downloadable version !
Hmm -
hi:
i test hp-tc4100 with red-hat 7.3 today.
it is okay after upgrade to 2.4.18-4.
(2.4.18-3 kernel panic after several hours. just like red-hat said.)
i also test the latest cooker 2.4.18-16
it crashed as usual.
so the problem seems at mandrake kernel.
hope 2.4.19 will fix it.
Have you tried kernel-secure, or an older kernel (for example the one
provided with 8.0) ?
Try to disable DMA in /etc/sysconfig/harddisk* (as suggested by John Allen).
Stef
Le Mardi 28 Mai 2002 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ?crit :
hi:
i test hp-tc4100 with red-hat 7.3 today.
it is okay after
hi:
our company buy a hp lc2000 server and try to install mdk 8.2 on it.
it can not pass testing and finally we run mdk 8.1 at it.
this time we buy a certified server - hp tc4100.
the machine arrived today and it fail again.
this machine comes with 2 cpu and 1g ram.
to use the memory
Not even using the high density format (fd0u1760 I
think) like tomsrtbt uses?
Tomsrtbt uses fd0u1722, the highest you can go and still have the BIOSes
happy booting them, and not have problems with the gaps.
1760 is 80 tracks 22 sectors, 1722 is 82 tracks 21 sectors, so, 1722 runs
some
I am not able to install cooker (and 8.2) on IBM PC SERVER 330.
The error is :cannot find cdrom.
I tried to load all availables modules but no one worked.
IBM PC SERVER 330 has got scsi controller with ibm raid feautures.
How can I install ? Maybe I have to do a custom boot image with ips.o
Miguel Beccari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not able to install cooker (and 8.2) on IBM PC SERVER 330.
The error is :cannot find cdrom.
I tried to load all availables modules but no one worked.
IBM PC SERVER 330 has got scsi controller with ibm raid feautures.
How can I install
On Monday 08 April 2002 06:05 pm, Pixel wrote:
Miguel Beccari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not able to install cooker (and 8.2) on IBM PC SERVER 330.
The error is :cannot find cdrom.
Try booting from floppy, then inserting the first CD just before it is
required. This worked for me under
Pixel wrote:
you should be able to boot install using all.img
(which is there on CD2 using isolinux)
What is isolinux all about?Where to look?
--
Ron. [au]
Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pixel wrote:
you should be able to boot install using all.img
(which is there on CD2 using isolinux)
What is isolinux all about?Where to look?
google isolinux = http://syslinux.zytor.com/iso.php
Since 8.2 (and the 8.2 betas) I cannot go to system directories like winnt,
programs.
Win2k (and Win98) are on FAT32 partitions and are correctly recognized by
fdsik.
I can switch to all normal (i.e. non system) directories and see the contents
and I can copy to and from those directories.
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 11:12, Frederic Bastok wrote:
StarOffice 6 final will be available in PowerPack and Prosuite without any
additionnal costs. This is the full version in 5 languages.
In the next days, you should hear about another way to get StarOffice from
Mandrake (final and full
holditch
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] [MDK 8.2]Harddrake Freezes my Dell Inspiron 8000
I had troubles setting up my display also, but I'm
using the dell XFConfig-4 file, which is working fine.
My machine also doesn't lock up with harddrake at all
On Wednesday 27 March 2002 11:21, Alan wrote:
Occasionally a process eats up everything in KDE. I have yet to find out
what because I cannot open a shell or do anything useful. If I try and log
out of KDE, it sometimes just dies. Trying to SSH to the machine just
hangs as well. (The
There are issues with this laptop and APIC. Try this:
in /etc/lilo.conf add to your append=
noapic
it may look like this
append=devfs=mount quiet noapic
This will resolve quite a few of the laptop issues. Unfortunately, it will
not resolve the problem associated with suspend to ram crash/reboot
I have a Dell Inspiron 8000 with the following specs:
15SXGA 1400x1050 res 16MB ATI-Rage Mobility
128MB RAM 20 GB HDD DVD drive, Inbuilt Intel EEPro 100 and Lucent LT modem
I have two problems- the first is carried over from MDK 8.1 days:
1) The video driver does not get detected correctly - it
On Thursday 28 March 2002 03:29 am, you wrote:
There are issues with this laptop and APIC. Try this:
in /etc/lilo.conf add to your append=
noapic
it may look like this
append=devfs=mount quiet noapic
don't forget to type lilo after saving it!
This will resolve quite a few of the laptop
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 17:45, you wrote:
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 09:31, Frederic Bastok wrote:
Taken for the EULA:
2. Linux End User License To Use. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this Agreement, if you are a Linux operating system end user and you
received the Software as part
I had troubles setting up my display also, but I'm
using the dell XFConfig-4 file, which is working fine.
My machine also doesn't lock up with harddrake at all.
--- SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 28 March 2002 03:29 am, you wrote:
There are issues with this laptop and
I have a clean install of 8.2 on one of my production machines. I am having
a couple of problems with it.
On shutdown, the system will hang on a couple of places. Either there is a
process which it cannot kill or it cannot unmount /net.
Occasionally a process eats up everything in KDE. I
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 11:21, Alan wrote:
I have a clean install of 8.2 on one of my production machines. I am having
a couple of problems with it.
On shutdown, the system will hang on a couple of places. Either there is a
process which it cannot kill or it cannot unmount /net.
I have
--- Frederic Bastok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we don't have any plans for a sparc version
:~(
What would it take for one to be created?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 01:17, you wrote:
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 16:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Final version, of course.
What does your OEM agreement say about licensing? One install per
download, or one install per multiple of $120, or multiple installs but
only for personal use of the
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 09:31, Frederic Bastok wrote:
Taken for the EULA:
2. Linux End User License To Use. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this Agreement, if you are a Linux operating system end user and you received
the Software as part of a Linux operating system bundle, Sun grants
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 00:55, you wrote:
--- Frederic Bastok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we don't have any plans for a sparc version
:~(
What would it take for one to be created?
time, ressources and money.
usually we say that porting Mandrake to a new platform costs 40% of the
global
On Saturday 23 March 2002 16:01, you wrote:
On Friday 22 March 2002 18:12, Frederic Bastok wrote:
Of course, I won't (and nobody will at Mandrake) answer any questions
regarding the agreement with SUN to distribute it or comments rumors like
Is SUN buying Mandrake ? Perhaps it is true,
Of course, I won't (and nobody will at Mandrake) answer any questions
regarding the agreement with SUN to distribute it or comments rumors like
Is SUN buying Mandrake ? Perhaps it is true, perhaps it is wrong ? :-)
It must be true, I emailed Sun about 3 months ago and suggested it. (-:
Would
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 16:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Final version, of course.
What does your OEM agreement say about licensing? One install per
download, or one install per multiple of $120, or multiple installs but
only for personal use of the MdkClub member, or... (?)
I would love to not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
It must be true, I emailed Sun about 3 months ago and suggested it. (-:
So long as Sun let the Mandrakers stay semi-independent, it probably
*would* be a good thing. Certainly Sun could help
On Friday 22 March 2002 18:12, Frederic Bastok wrote:
Of course, I won't (and nobody will at Mandrake) answer any questions
regarding the agreement with SUN to distribute it or comments rumors like
Is SUN buying Mandrake ? Perhaps it is true, perhaps it is wrong ? :-)
It must be true, I
On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:11, Timothy R. Butler wrote:
I thought no comment just meant that I would not answer the question
No ?
Is it that you personally don't know/want to answer the question, or all
of MandrakeSoft can't? I'd sure hate to get my PowerPack and find out I
have to
I respect mdk, will not answer what deal they have made.
The reason why I asked it, was will it be a full license, i.e. for
commercial use.
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 19:20, andre wrote:
Op donderdag 21 maart 2002 12:51, schreef u:
That's interesting, are you not commenting on 'what is that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to upgrade my LM8.1 to 8.2 (using the upgrade option). My PC
is behind a firewall which is connected to the net via ADSL. To get
8.1 to connect to the net I had to set MTU on eth0 to 1492. That
worked OK, but during the upgrade 8.2 goes to
set MTU on eth0 to 1492.
I believe you can change it from the 2nd virtual console during install. I
may be wrong.
-Dave
. Cooker is cooker, 8.2 updates and 8.2
unsupported (which does not yet exist, but no doubt will in time) are
for 'polishing' 8.2.
--
Ron. [au]
On Thu Mar 21 9:14 +0100, trax wrote:
I commented, as I hear Sun will charge around $100 for the license.
So how MDK will include this, seems a fair bit of whack.
It's fairly standard to offer bulk licensees a vastly reduced price.
With several thousand users, Mandrake probably has to pay
the floppy.
Francisco Alcaraz
Murcia (Spain)
- Mensaje Original -
Remitente: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fecha: Miércoles, Marzo 20, 2002 11:47 pm
Asunto: Re: [Cooker] Mandarke 8.2 first impressions
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Juan Quintela [EMAIL
I commented, as I hear Sun will charge around $100 for the license.
So how MDK will include this, seems a fair bit of whack.
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 00:58, Michael Holt wrote:
4:25pm... Frederic Bastok ran for the door shrieking:
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
So is MDK paying
i got this mail recently
***
PRIVACY STATEMENT This message has been sent to you on behalf of Sun
Microsystems, Inc. using MarketModel's e-mail service. This message is being
sent to those of you who downloaded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi:
after installing 8.2, i found that there are no
text penguin at the virtual console like before.
and there are no Aurora anymore...
so i try to setup bootsplash, i must setup lilo
and mkinitrd again. (bootsplash is disable default, why??)
i
That's interesting, are you not commenting on 'what is that supposed
to mean?' or are you just explaing that no comment means exactly
the same as 'no comment', which ofcourse the asker of the
question already understood.
Therefore, assuming that you do not want to comment on the question
what
On Thursday 21 March 2002 12:51, you wrote:
That's interesting, are you not commenting on 'what is that supposed
to mean?' or are you just explaing that no comment means exactly
the same as 'no comment', which ofcourse the asker of the
question already understood.
Therefore, assuming that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps my last message didn't arrive to the list:
The problem was solved, not possible during install, but after runing
8.2 form Mandrake Control Center i was able to create the floppy in a
normal 1.44 one; perhaps is a problem with install???
report.bug ?
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 16:10, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
So as long as there is no mandatory reason to do so, we won't do
so.
Erm, there is. No boot disk for XFS-rooted systems.
I guess I don't understand the it's too hard to do it under Windows
argument. Is there some reason that making a
Brad Felmey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 16:10, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
So as long as there is no mandatory reason to do so, we won't do
so.
Erm, there is. No boot disk for XFS-rooted systems.
Boot disks are not as important as there were before, nowadays.
And
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 09:34, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Brad Felmey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 16:10, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
So as long as there is no mandatory reason to do so, we won't do
so.
Erm, there is. No boot disk for XFS-rooted systems.
I thought no comment just meant that I would not answer the question
No ?
Is it that you personally don't know/want to answer the question, or all of
MandrakeSoft can't? I'd sure hate to get my PowerPack and find out I have to
pay another hundred bucks to use the copy of StarOffice that
Brad Felmey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Erm, there is. No boot disk for XFS-rooted systems.
Boot disks are not as important as there were before, nowadays.
And for XFS, in the core of the problem there is a huge module
that is re-implementing the whole VFS for compatibility..
Okay,
Op donderdag 21 maart 2002 12:51, schreef u:
That's interesting, are you not commenting on 'what is that supposed
to mean?' or are you just explaing that no comment means exactly
the same as 'no comment', which ofcourse the asker of the
question already understood.
Therefore, assuming that
I don't think you should ask what deal Mandrake has made with Sun because
you know that that question wont be answered.
Only question i have is it a full license (exept maybe that mdk does the
support) or are is it a lesser license
Yes, I agree. It seems only fair to know what we are
I don't think you should ask what deal Mandrake has made with
Sun because you
know that that question wont be answered.
Only question i have is it a full license (exept maybe that mdk
does the
support) or are is it a lesser license
I think it is the good question.
When you buy the
On Tuesday 19 March 2002 23:25, you wrote:
Hi,
only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a BETA
Version???
Michael
Final :-)
--
Frederic Bastok
On 20 Mar 2002, Juan Quintela wrote:
No way to make a boot floppy with xfs, not enough space :(
Perhaps installer should detect that, Pixel?
Well, as a translator I know that strings warning the user about that
is in DrakX. I can't say if they are used though.
Regards,
Mattias
So is MDK paying the license fee then?
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 23:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a BETA
Version???
Final version, of course. Sun will
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
So is MDK paying the license fee then?
No comment
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 23:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a
Hi:
i remember there was a modified mkbootdisk, which would make 1.7 mb
boot disk for XFS(at sgi xfs faq).
will this put to Mandrake in the update or future release?
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
falcarz Problems:
falcarz 1) Start floppy:
Hi:
after installing 8.2, i found that there are no
text penguin at the virtual console like before.
and there are no Aurora anymore...
so i try to setup bootsplash, i must setup lilo
and mkinitrd again. (bootsplash is disable default, why??)
i miss the mandrake text penguin at
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
