Re: [css-d] Layout glitching on href hover

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Georg wrote: > On 27.02.2013 11:55, Tom Livingston wrote: > >> Good to know I am not going crazy. Yet. >> > > :-) ... apparently not yet. > > The addition of... > > .calloutwrap p {overflow: hidden;} > > ...seems to make IE10 behave in your case. You must check

Re: [css-d] Layout glitching on href hover

On 27.02.2013 11:55, Tom Livingston wrote: Good to know I am not going crazy. Yet. :-) ... apparently not yet. The addition of... .calloutwrap p {overflow: hidden;} ...seems to make IE10 behave in your case. You must check at your end so we know it isn't an "only on some systems" fix. I'll

Re: [css-d] Layout glitching on href hover

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Georg wrote: > On 27.02.2013 11:30, Tom Livingston wrote: > >> http://proof.mlinc.com/tl/**cssd3/test.html >>> >>> In Win 8, IE 10 (desktop or 'metro'), when we hover over the href in the >>> middle callout at the bottom

Re: [css-d] Layout glitching on href hover

On 27.02.2013 11:30, Tom Livingston wrote: http://proof.mlinc.com/tl/cssd3/test.html In Win 8, IE 10 (desktop or 'metro'), when we hover over the href in the middle callout at the bottom, the shadowed containing div of the three callouts expands down is some broken and odd way leaving odd double

Re: [css-d] Layout glitching on href hover

So no takers on this? Am I missing something so simple that everyone was afraid to tell me? No one has IE 10 to test in? The layout has changed on the actual page, but I'd still love to know what was going on on my test page... Thanks! On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: >

Re: [css-d] Layout glitching on href hover

UPDATE: It appears that removing the min-height on the .callout items stops the problem. Anyone see how I can get around the issue? I would like to keep the min-height for layout reasons... TIA On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > Listers, > > I have this layout: > > http

[css-d] Layout glitching on href hover

Listers, I have this layout: http://proof.mlinc.com/tl/cssd3/test.html In Win 8, IE 10 (desktop or 'metro'), when we hover over the href in the middle callout at the bottom, the shadowed containing div of the three callouts expands down is some broken and odd way leaving odd double rounded corne

Re: [css-d] layout problems on first page load only

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: The first step is always to correct your HTML: Chris F.A. Johnson Rory, Go to Tidy Online

Re: [css-d] layout problems on first page load only

On Sun, 18 Mar 2012, Rory Bernstein wrote: On this page: http://125.pratt.edu/gallery/search&category=featured/featured In Firefox on the mac, the row of yellow tabs (navigation) are spreading out too far when the page initially loads. If you do a page reload, they load correctly (one next to

[css-d] layout problems on first page load only

On this page: http://125.pratt.edu/gallery/search&category=featured/featured In Firefox on the mac, the row of yellow tabs (navigation) are spreading out too far when the page initially loads. If you do a page reload, they load correctly (one next to the other), with the whole bar of tabs not be

[css-d] layout

Comments and suggestions appreciated This end: OS X 10.4.11 Android/2.2.2/ with Opera Mobile and OperaMini. Best, Angelina -- Desktop. Laptop. Tablet. Mobile! http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __

Re: [css-d] layout problem? maybe a float problem?

Rory Bernstein wrote: Thank you, Theirry. I put a surrounding div around the 2 divs that weren't behaving, and stopped the absolute positioning of the one div. Put overflow: hidden on the surrounding div and my life is hugely improved. Sorry for those excessive clear:both things, I had thrown a

Re: [css-d] layout problem? maybe a float problem?

Thank you, Theirry. I put a surrounding div around the 2 divs that weren't behaving, and stopped the absolute positioning of the one div. Put overflow: hidden on the surrounding div and my life is hugely improved. Sorry for those excessive clear:both things, I had thrown a bunch of them in the

Re: [css-d] layout problem? maybe a float problem?

> I have a layout problem here: > http://www.glitterlemonade.com/fundraiser/detail/monsters_magnetic_figu > res > > On other pages on the site, the footer behaves and shows up under the > rest of the content, but not on this page. Here it is OK: > http://www.glitterlemonade.com/get_involved > > I

[css-d] layout problem? maybe a float problem?

I have a layout problem here: http://www.glitterlemonade.com/fundraiser/detail/monsters_magnetic_figures On other pages on the site, the footer behaves and shows up under the rest of the content, but not on this page. Here it is OK: http://www.glitterlemonade.com/get_involved In general the foot

Re: [css-d] Layout problems: extra vertical space

Ah. OK, makes sense. Thank you so much. Always an education on this list. Rory On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:49 PM, G.Sørtun wrote: > Depending on relation to other elements you may have to add 'clear: left', > 'right' or 'both' on an image to make it stay in position when applying > 'display: block'

Re: [css-d] Layout problems: extra vertical space

Depending on relation to other elements you may have to add 'clear: left', 'right' or 'both' on an image to make it stay in position when applying 'display: block'. Images do after all start to behave like block-elements when you declare it. regards Georg

Re: [css-d] Layout problems: extra vertical space

Thanks, Georg. That helped a lot! http://weinraub.ehclients.com/lawyers/ It is strange, but the image of the windows I had to use the "vertical-align: bottom;" rule, and the other 2 images liked the "display: block;" rule. When I used the display rule on the windows it moved it out to the right

Re: [css-d] Layout problems: extra vertical space

http://weinraub.ehclients.com/lawyers/ You will see some annoying grey, horizontal strips on the page: under the photo of the windows under the black nav bar another one just under that... and one at the bottom Declare... img.yourclass {display: block;} ...or... img.yourclass {vertical-align:

[css-d] Layout problems: extra vertical space

Here I am again, with different layout problems on the same project, different page: http://weinraub.ehclients.com/lawyers/ You will see some annoying grey, horizontal strips on the page: under the photo of the windows under the black nav bar another one just under that... and one at the bottom

[css-d] layout IE trouble

Hi the site is http://tk-studio-design.webhop.org (must be without www). I checked on IEtester and have problem with layout of picture and footer. They are moved right, out of the screen. Site is powered by Joomla and still under construction. I am not sure if U can access it, because I am hosting

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

Eric Peterson wrote: > Thanks for help provided; so far, still looking for more :) > > First, the discussion about the font style is a bit early in this process. I > have not decided on a font styling for my pages. The fonts I chose before > were just something I had grabbed from a previous fil

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

Thanks for help provided; so far, still looking for more :) First, the discussion about the font style is a bit early in this process. I have not decided on a font styling for my pages. The fonts I chose before were just something I had grabbed from a previous file I had worked on. Below I p

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

On 2010/06/27 16:57 (GMT+0200) Peter Hammarling composed: > David, for someone whose contributions here are so consistently > helpful and well-informed your crusade against Verdana is difficult to > comprehend, and out of place on this list. Several times I've nearly > risen to the bait of p

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

> This: > html { > font-family : "Trebuchet MS", Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; > font-size: 80%; > } > > Becomes this [user friendly and shorter]: > html { > font : 100%/1.4 Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; > } David, for someone whose contributions here are so consistently helpful and well-i

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

Eric Peterson wrote: > Why did you choose to use and in this manner? Why would a class="header"> definition not work the same way? Is there something about > the that is 'easier' or 'better'? > > > > > > I did not choose the method, I simply stripped Georg's layout, and deleted the

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

Interesting use of and as the footer and header. Thinking about it, I would have chosen and as they seem to be used a lot less. If I wanted to use as a header in this context, I would have to redefine a different header to emulate what the used to have. Not really a problem, just a ch

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

Eric Peterson wrote: > Below is the test page I've been playing with. What I am trying to do is >* have a header block at the top of the page/screen >* have a footer block at the bottom of the page/screen >* have a menu side bar on the right with links that does not scroll with > the

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

David Laakso wrote: Ooops. ~d -- desktop http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/F

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

On 2010/06/27 12:41 (GMT+0100) Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) composed: > David Laakso wrote: >> This: >> html { >> font-family : "Trebuchet MS", Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; >> font-size: 80%; >> } >> Becomes this [user friendly and shorter]: >> html { >> font : 100%/1.4 Helvetica, Ari

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

David Laakso wrote: > This: > html { > font-family : "Trebuchet MS", Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; > font-size: 80%; > } > > Becomes this [user friendly and shorter]: > html { > font : 100%/1.4 Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; > } With the greatest respect, your dislike for the fonts which M

Re: [css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

Eric Peterson wrote: > Below is the test page I've been playing with. > > Let's start here (take it slow and wait for others on the list who will offer good advice). This: html { font-family : "Trebuchet MS", Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 80%; } Becomes this [user friendl

[css-d] Layout help needed, almost right

Below is the test page I've been playing with. What I am trying to do is * have a header block at the top of the page/screen * have a footer block at the bottom of the page/screen * have a menu side bar on the right with links that does not scroll with the main content * have the cont

[css-d] Layout Basics: Floats, Position, Overflow

Hello, I have a question involving the effect of the position and overflow properties on floats. My example is a simple two-column layout. The left column, called "Main_Nav," is floated left and assigned a width (270px); the right column, called "Details," not floated nor assigned a width, is

Re: [css-d] Layout recommendation ?

Could give it a try, yes. > > - Original Message - > From: "Tom Livingston" > To: "BobSharp" > Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 9:15 PM > Subject: Re: [css-d] Layout recommendation ? > > > Equal height columns is a tough one... >

Re: [css-d] Layout recommendation ?

Could give it a try, yes. Can you please give an example ? thanks - Original Message - From: "Tom Livingston" To: "BobSharp" Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 9:15 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Layout recommendation ? Equal height columns is a tough one... Can

[css-d] Layout recommendation ?

Can anyone recommend a simple 3-column layout ? a.. 3 columns, equal height. b.. Fully cross-browser (except ie8) c.. Column priority = 2 - 1 - 3 (Search Engine Optimisation) d.. Side columns - fixed width. e.. Centre content - fluid width preferred, but if necessary, would se

Re: [css-d] Layout still broken, new problems

I think there's something called bootcamp and parallels too (sorry about the spelling, but if you google, it will correct itself) that should work on all MAC's. Regards, -- Krystian - Sunlust Affordable Web Services in Eastbourne: http://eastbournewebdesign.net Mobile UK (Orange): 07528 036 337

Re: [css-d] Layout still broken, new problems

or testing. otherwise you'll never see that what 80% others see :) ciaociao tina > Von: Kim Brooks Wei > Datum: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:23:43 -0400 > An: CSS-Discuss > Betreff: [css-d] Layout still broken, new problems > > Hi there People, > > I got my site to look the w

Re: [css-d] Layout still broken, new problems

On Tuesday, March 17, 2009 12:23:43 am Kim Brooks Wei wrote: > Hi there People, > > I got my site to look the way I wish it to on my own Mac in Safari > and FF but the layout seems broken in other environments. A friend > using IE and another using FF told me that my type sits on top of the > tiger

[css-d] Layout still broken, new problems

Hi there People, I got my site to look the way I wish it to on my own Mac in Safari and FF but the layout seems broken in other environments. A friend using IE and another using FF told me that my type sits on top of the tiger and can't be read. They are not seeing the layout the way I wish it

Re: [css-d] Layout help in IE

Thanks so much! I ended up pretty much doing a pseudo re-write and I loosely based it off the yui grid layout http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/grids/ As far as I can tell it is now working in (most) all browsers. If anyone sees any glaring mistakes, please let me know. (css) design is not my stro

Re: [css-d] Layout help in IE

Jonathon Suggs wrote: > > In a related question, any tools similar to Firebug available for IE? > > The tools needed are the same regardless of the target browser: a clear head and a clear mind will do the trick. -- A thin red line and a salmon-color ampersand forthcoming. http://chelseacr

Re: [css-d] Layout help in IE

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:28:58 -0600, Jonathon Suggs wrote: [...] > > In a related question, any tools similar to Firebug available for IE? I find these useful: IE Debug Bar: RNIB Surf Right Toolbar

Re: [css-d] Layout help in IE

Jonathon Suggs wrote: > I'm needing some help with my layout in IE (common request, I know). > It is fine in FF, Opera (min), etc but sometimes has large gaps in > IE6/7. http://www.murmp.com The addition of... #sidebar {position: relative;} ...seems to stabilize that part in IE6. You have a

[css-d] Layout help in IE

Hi, I'm needing some help with my layout in IE (common request, I know). It is fine in FF, Opera (min), etc but sometimes has large gaps in IE6/7. http://www.murmp.com I'm about to do a minor redesign, but the general structure is going to (hopefully) stay the same unless it just needs major rew

Re: [css-d] Layout-problem

2009/1/9 Holly Bergevin : > From: "Ib Jensen" > >>Link : http://ikjensen.dk/test/> > >>Second problem. >>The menu in the left sidebar works ok on the Index-page, but not on a >>second page. >> >>Menu : Genealogy -> Kings of Denmark > > Can you explain what you mean when you say it doesn't work? I

Re: [css-d] Layout-problem

From: "Ib Jensen" >Link : http://ikjensen.dk/test/> >Second problem. >The menu in the left sidebar works ok on the Index-page, but not on a >second page. > >Menu : Genealogy -> Kings of Denmark Can you explain what you mean when you say it doesn't work? I see hover effects, and if you click on

Re: [css-d] Layout-problem

Ib Jensen wrote: > 2009/1/8 David Laakso : > > >> Could not find menu second page. >> >> > > Try in the Top-menu-bar = first menu-point = Genealogy, Menu-point = > Kings of Denmark. > > On this page : The menu in the right side. > > > > re: Dunno. Can't he

Re: [css-d] Layout-problem

2009/1/8 David Laakso : > Ib Jensen wrote: > Name of the game: Code to Opera -- FF, Safari, and Camino will follow > suit. Fix IE. > > #container {padding-top: 1px;}<-- fix 4 collapsing margins > .head h1{font-size:250%; margin: 40px 0 10px 0;padding: 0; > color:#fff;font-weight:normal;} > .head h

Re: [css-d] Layout-problem

Ib Jensen wrote: > > Link : http://ikjensen.dk/test/> > > > > Strangely, In IE 6, it shows almost as I wanted it to look like. > In FF2, it doesn't. > > > The menu in the left sidebar works ok on the Index-page, but not on a > second page. > > > This may help compliant browsers... Name of th

[css-d] Layout-problem

Hi, it's me again ;-) Link : http://ikjensen.dk/test/> Having a major problem with this layout. Strangely, In IE 6, it shows almost as I wanted it to look like. In FF2, it doesn't. Second problem. The menu in the left sidebar works ok on the Index-page, but not on a second page. Menu : Geneal

Re: [css-d] Layout help

Tim Wolak wrote: > Morning all, > > Also one of my pages has a back line on it and for the life of me I > can't figure out where its coming from and its in every browser except IE. > > Thanks, > Tim > > > Page with line: http://dev.howsmykiddriving.org/aboutus.php

Re: [css-d] Layout help

Tim Wolak wrote: > Morning all, > > I tried what David has suggested and its still letting the page > stretch way out. Any ideas? Also one of my pages has a back line on > it and for the life of me I can't figure out where its coming from and > its in every browser except IE. > > Thanks, > Tim

Re: [css-d] Layout help

Morning all, I tried what David has suggested and its still letting the page stretch way out. Any ideas? Also one of my pages has a back line on it and for the life of me I can't figure out where its coming from and its in every browser except IE. Thanks, Tim Main: http://dev.howsmykiddriving.o

Re: [css-d] Layout help

Tim Wolak wrote: > Morning all, > > I am fairly new to css and am having some design issues and could use some > help. I have most of my main content within a wrapper and have a header and > a footer. The main content slides all over the place as the window is re > sized, is there a better way of

[css-d] Layout help

Morning all, I am fairly new to css and am having some design issues and could use some help. I have most of my main content within a wrapper and have a header and a footer. The main content slides all over the place as the window is re sized, is there a better way of going about this so if a us

Re: [css-d] Layout jumps around

wlb wrote: > Greetings! > > I have a minor but irritating problem. > > > http://www.boletta.com/bolestyle/ > > Bill Boletta > See page shift: __ css-discuss [EMAIL

Re: [css-d] Layout jumps around

wlb wrote: > I am prototyping a site that uses a graphic navbar at the top. The > buttons work, but some of the buttons ("classes" and "seminar") cause > the entire layout to jump about 10 px to the right when clicked. > This only happens in Safari and Opera on the Mac. Firefox on Mac and > WI

[css-d] Layout jumps around

Greetings! I have a minor but irritating problem. I am prototyping a site that uses a graphic navbar at the top. The buttons work, but some of the buttons ("classes" and "seminar") cause the entire layout to jump about 10 px to the right when clicked. This only happens in Safari and Opera on the

Re: [css-d] Layout problems with bkgrd color, footer position, left nav, etc.

Kathy Davie wrote: > I am having myriad issues with this css, > http://kddidit.com/CSS/stylesAMTF.css > when its applied to this page, http://kddidit.com/AMTF/ > audioList.html. I recently had to reload the Leopard OS in my > computer and this is when I started having these issues. > >

Re: [css-d] Layout problems with bkgrd color, footer position, left nav, etc.

Kathy Davie wrote: > I am having myriad issues with this css, > http://kddidit.com/CSS/stylesAMTF.css > http://kddidit.com/AMTF/audioList.html. Do you really mean "font-size : 16em;" on all those elements? That value blows the entire page across a few dozen screens all by itself since it gets mu

[css-d] Layout problems with bkgrd color, footer position, left nav, etc.

I am having myriad issues with this css, http://kddidit.com/CSS/stylesAMTF.css when its applied to this page, http://kddidit.com/AMTF/ audioList.html. I recently had to reload the Leopard OS in my computer and this is when I started having these issues. 1. Although I have set a background

[css-d] Layout problems in Internet explorer

Hi, I have a problem with a table which breaks the layout in IE6/7. I have partially solved the problem in Firefox declaring body{float:left} so that a floating object can contain all other floating objects. Not so in Ie. The only way to have the same result in IE was the following declaration: #

Re: [css-d] layout robustness

> > For IE<7 i cheated with fixed width (remembering the words on the cover > of Mike Oldfields "Tubular Bells" album). > > OT - As for authors, one assured me she was already a CMS site manager > with lots of experience, so i promoted her, she then promptly loaded two > 24bit 470x350px bmp images

Re: [css-d] layout robustness

On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:26:34 -0700 Thierry Koblentz wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] discuss.org] On Behalf Of Michael > > Adams Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 12:28 PM > > To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.o

Re: [css-d] layout robustness

On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:34:48 -0400 David Laakso wrote: > Michael Adams wrote: > > Using negative margins and fluid layout in a CMS template and just > > wondering how others handle robustness issues. If one of the authors > > places a large image in content which looks good on their browser, > > b

Re: [css-d] layout robustness

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > discuss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Adams > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 12:28 PM > To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: [css-d] layout robustness > > > Using negative margin

Re: [css-d] layout robustness

David Laakso wrote: > Michael Adams wrote: >> Using negative margins and fluid layout in a CMS template and just >> wondering how others handle robustness issues. If one of the authors >> places a large image in content which looks good on their browser, but >> it is to big for 800x600 how do you h

Re: [css-d] layout robustness

Michael Adams wrote: > Using negative margins and fluid layout in a CMS template and just > wondering how others handle robustness issues. If one of the authors > places a large image in content which looks good on their browser, but > it is to big for 800x600 how do you handle the overflow. > > >

[css-d] layout robustness

Using negative margins and fluid layout in a CMS template and just wondering how others handle robustness issues. If one of the authors places a large image in content which looks good on their browser, but it is to big for 800x600 how do you handle the overflow. At present if i use "overflow: hi

Re: [css-d] Layout problem in IE6

Daniel Hammond wrote: > URL: http://rsdesignandprint.com/5619lakeforrest/index.html > > The site looks great in every browser except IE6. I figure it's just > reading the padding or margins differently than the other browsers. Yes, it does - on floats. It is known as the "margin-doubling on floa

[css-d] Layout problem in IE6

URL: http://rsdesignandprint.com/5619lakeforrest/index.html CSS: http://rsdesignandprint.com/5619lakeforrest/index.css The site looks great in every browser except IE6. I figure it's just reading the padding or margins differently than the other browsers. I really don't want to change those attrib

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

David Laakso wrote: > Rafael wrote: >> Well, let's try to bring it back in topic. >> >> What I've done is to add some elements with "no-spam" >> legends, hiding them later on with CSS (and using JS to make it an >> actual link). This may not be the best approach, but it's, like >> eve

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

Rafael wrote: > > Well, let's try to bring it back in topic. > > What I've done is to add some elements with "no-spam" legends, > hiding them later on with CSS (and using JS to make it an actual link). > This may not be the best approach, but it's, like everything else, just > anothe

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

David Laakso wrote: > Luc wrote: > >> David , just a quick remark: >> >> wouldn't it be better to use another alternative for the e-mail? Just >> to "try" to limit a bit of spam attack... >> > > off-list reply *** > > > I am not sure what a spam attack has to do with the nature and pur

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

Good evening David, It was foretold that on 09/03/2008 @ 12:55:21 GMT-0400 (which was 13:55:21 where I live) David Laakso would write: > You did not waste my time. > And I appreciate your comment. > I just do not have time to respond properly to why I do not think > setting text in an image,

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

Luc wrote: > > Avoiding spam isn't possible indeed. But as i said "to "try" limit a > bit of spam attack. Maybe using an image with the e-maildress instead > of a clicking link > > Anyway, i'm sorry if i waisted your time David. > > > You did not waste my time. And I appreciate your com

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

Tim Offenstein wrote: > Recommend using as opposed to in the interest of > semantic markup. There are plans to deprecate the i and b tags > because they're not semantic, they're presentational. FWIW: and are not deprecated in existing markup languages, and there are no such plans on the tab

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

Thanks to all who have taken time to review the layout. The owner of the site and I will consider all of the comments and suggestions presented-- even those having nothing to do with the mission or purpose of this list: the "practical discussion of CSS and its use." ~dL > I'd appreciate any

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

At 10:36 PM -0500 3/8/08, David Laakso wrote: >Thierry Koblentz wrote: >>> >>> >> >> One thing I noticed (and I was surprised by this since you have a link to >> Lynx in the footer) is that the site is difficult to navigate via the >> keyboard. >>

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

Luc wrote: > Hello David, > It was foretold that on 08/03/2008 @ 18:58:15 GMT-0500 (which was > 20:58:15 where I live) David Laakso would write: > > > > >> I'd appreciate any comments and suggestions on this 6 page comprehensive >> layout for an industrial site. The marketing target is the

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

Thierry Koblentz wrote: >> >> > > I think the 6th row of the table is missing a last cell. > Also, I think you could do a better use of the summary attribute, maybe by > using something like: This table charts our Distributors and Dealers along >

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

Hello David, It was foretold that on 08/03/2008 @ 18:58:15 GMT-0500 (which was 20:58:15 where I live) David Laakso would write: > I'd appreciate any comments and suggestions on this 6 page comprehensive > layout for an industrial site. The marketing target is the IE browsers. David , just

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > discuss.org] On Behalf Of David Laakso > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 3:58 PM > To: css discuss > Subject: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL > > I'd appreciate any comments a

Re: [css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:58 PM, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd appreciate any comments and suggestions on this 6 page comprehensive > layout for an industrial site. The marketing target is the IE browsers. > Mac/IE5.2 gets it right. > > /Known Issue:/ 147.69 second download on a 5

[css-d] :: layout check :: ~dL

I'd appreciate any comments and suggestions on this 6 page comprehensive layout for an industrial site. The marketing target is the IE browsers. Mac/IE5.2 gets it right. /Known Issue:/ 147.69 second download on a 56K modem (the images will be optimized in the production version).

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

> On Dec 22, 2007, at 9:43 AM, Jeroen wrote: > >> I''m working on a design for a photo blog, and stumbled upon an overflow >> issue for >> which I can't find the cause. >> >> I copied all relevant code to a test file: URL: >> http://test.intellit.nl/test.html [...] >> HTML & css is valid (CSS par

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

Jeroen wrote: > I see you added a width of 510px to the details container, the problem is > I don't know the size beforehand, it changes with every photo. The pblog > software I use only gives out the width of the photo (533px) in this case. > > Is there a way to do it with percentages / relative

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

On Dec 22, 2007 4:42 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, you have added 10px padding to all sides of a 100% wide > #title-date. That makes it 100%+20px wide in standard mode. > > Also: IE6/7 can't make up their mind about the container-width with a > scrollbar, and IE6 can't calcu

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

> I did however stumble upon something else (for another part of the webpage); > It seems when you have a container and floats inside them, the container > does not stretch to the size of the floats. Is there a way to overcome > that problem without specifying the sizes explicitly? > Sample code:

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

Jeroen wrote: > the right float has 10px smaller > font size. the right float has > same font size as left. > > Any clues? Either you had a margin-top in there, or the software you got that outline from is broken beyond

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

Jeroen wrote: > It seems when you have a container and floats inside them, the > container does not stretch to the size of the floats. Is there a way > to overcome that problem without specifying the sizes explicitly? > > Sample code: . Sure. It's the old "ex

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

Jeroen wrote: > . > > How does the aligning of the floats work? Floats go as high as they can, but not higher - unless you pull them up. So, floats always align vertically with their top edge or margin in line with whatever element they line up against. With 2 f

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

On Dec 22, 2007 6:26 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Either you had a margin-top in there, or the software you got that > outline from is broken beyond repair. > > A more direct approach... > >

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

On Dec 22, 2007 2:59 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeroen wrote: > > . > > > > How does the aligning of the floats work? > > Floats go as high as they can, but not higher - unless you pull them up. > So, floats always align vertically with their

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

On Dec 22, 2007 11:48 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeroen wrote: > > > I see you added a width of 510px to the details container, the problem is > > I don't know the size beforehand, it changes with every photo. The pblog > > software I use only gives out the width of the photo (

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > ... > You can safely drop the '-moz-opacity'. Gecko browsers support the > 'opacity' property since at least Firefox 1.0, if not earlier. > Nice side note. Is it common consent to drop workarounds for Fx pre 0.9? :) http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/releases/

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

Jeroen wrote: > http://test.intellit.nl/test.html > > As you can see there is overflow for the X and Y axis, but I only > expect the Y axis to be overflowing. What is causing this behavior? > And how can I fix this? I suppose it has to do with box model which I > probably interpret incorrectly

Re: [css-d] Layout & Overflow issue

On Dec 22, 2007, at 9:43 AM, Jeroen wrote: > I''m working on a design for a photo blog, and stumbled upon an > overflow issue for > which I can't find the cause. > > I copied all relevant code to a test file: URL: > http://test.intellit.nl/test.html > > As you can see there is overflow for the X

  1   2   3   4   >