Re: [ctwm] [PATCH] Icon manager not catching on to deiconification

2007-03-08 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
For everyone's information, that change is now in the repo, and Matthew now has write access as well. Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ctwm] [ANNOUNCE] CTWM 3.8a released

2007-02-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, So, time for a release. The reason there's a 3.8a and not a 3.8 is last minute documentation fixes. The web site is updated with everything I can remember, and I've just updated freashmeat as well. Following are the visible changes implemented in this version. Of course, there are quite a

Re: [ctwm] [rt.lp.se #132] It seems we have a memory leak or buffer overflow

2007-02-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:59:30 +1000, Anthony Thyssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: anthony> Congradulations it is no longer crashing on two f.deletes anthony> from the title bar button. Thanks. anthony> You can remove the DEBUG:: lines for offset 'random anthony> pos

Re: [ctwm] closing occupy window causes crash

2007-02-14 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:38:24 +1000, Anthony Thyssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: anthony> This is the same found I reported two weeks ago! (no response) anthony> anthony> As soon as I close two xterms using f.delete CTwm crashes. I tested that case, but couldn't rep

[ctwm] Is it ungarbled now?

2007-02-12 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Please answer. I apparently have a very tolerant mail server, so I don't get the problem. I believe that the problem is that minimalist didn't remove the 'From ' line and then adding more headers on top of it, thereby confusing some mail servers and having them split the message at the 'From ' li

Re: [ctwm] Re: WarpCursor

2007-02-08 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:50:12 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> On Thu 08 Feb 2007 at 22:38:19 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: rhialto> > OK. Between then and now, this is the sequence of rhialto> > revisions

Re: [ctwm] Re: WarpCursor

2007-02-08 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:22:32 +0200, "Zvi Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rl> Checking again, my previous update was in January 26. OK. Between then and now, this is the sequence of revisions since January 25th. Could you try pinpoint the first one where you run

Re: [ctwm] More things to clean? Release?

2007-02-02 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:17:08 -0500, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: monnier> >> >> Well, I still have my OnTopPriority stuff, but I don't think anyone monnier> >> >> has the time/energy to work on it soon, monnier> >> [...] monnier> >> > It would also be n

Re: [ctwm] More things to clean? Release?

2007-02-02 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:57:43 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> I say, clean it out. Expecially X11R6, I think we all have rhialto> that release by now :-). Done. rhialto> So, summarizing, I have no current stuff to push or rhialto> short-term plans

[ctwm] More things to clean? Release?

2007-02-01 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, I'm in a bit of a cleaning frenzy, and now that I've cleaned up I18N, I'm on to the next, X11R6 (or USE_SESSION in Imakefile.local). My question is, is there any reason NOT to defined USE_SESSION / X11R6? If that's the case, I'll clean that out. After that, I wanna to a release run, in the m

Re: [ctwm] A curious undocumented key mapping feature

2007-01-26 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:04:04 +0100, Claude Lecommandeur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: claude.lecommandeur>Do you know f.showbackground, the only usage is to show your nice claude.lecommandeur> background image to your friends. Hah, no, I hadn't noticed that one!

Re: [ctwm] A curious undocumented key mapping feature

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:21:04 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> I was idly browsing through the code for mapping keys to ctwm rhialto> functions, and I came across something weird. Consider the rhialto> following (undocumented) config file fragment: r

Re: [ctwm] Uhmmm, assignment as condition?

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:33:40 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> But I'll change it to rhialto> rhialto>if ((tmp_win->group = tmp_win->wmhints->window_group) != 0) { rhialto> rhialto> or would you prefer rhialto> rhialto>tmp_win->gro

[ctwm] Uhmmm, assignment as condition?

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Olaf, in 785ff2b380a7e6daa98ceed789345ce373c4b5d9, add_window.c, you have coded a combined assignment and condition: if (tmp_win->group = tmp_win->wmhints->window_group) { Is that your intention? If not, you might want to correct t. If it is, I'd like to ask you (and everybody else) to

Re: [ctwm] [rt.lp.se #129] Funny behaviour of Occupy Window

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:30:53 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> I'm closing the ticket (well I'm going to try anyway :-) It worked well. I was only surprised to see it happen as part of a separate internal comment, but I guess you figured by now tha

Re: [ctwm] Where to get latest ctwm beta

2007-01-24 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:00:35 +1000, Anthony Thyssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: anthony> I looked around on the web but I can't seem to find the anthony> latest beta for ctwm. my last one was data dec 2005, and the anthony> one on the CTwm website is older than that

Re: [ctwm] Examples of programs that have real "group leader" windows?

2007-01-22 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:38:35 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> I wonder, btw, what should done with "sqeezed" windows (aka rhialto> "rolled up"): should doing that to the group leader also do rhialto> it to the group members? Or unmap them, like happ

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-18 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:21:32 +0100 (CET), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: richard> After having looked through programs like xfontsel and xterm, richard> it seems like the UCS (UTF-8) interpretation somewhere in X richa

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:29:48 +0100, Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kai> Looks like Shift-JIS encoding. Or is it ISO 2022? In any case, it kai> isn't UTF. That was my mailer (Mew), which seems to insist on doing that. The hex output (which you skipped

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
After having looked through programs like xfontsel and xterm, it seems like the UCS (UTF-8) interpretation somewhere in X (on the server side, I guess) is a little bit lacking. xfontsel converts all UCS codes to Char2b internally, and it looks like xterm does the same, perhaps (the code looks a bi

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
ECTED]> said: rl> I am using rl> rl> TitleFont "-misc-fixed-bold-r-normal--13-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1". rl> rl> Howrever, if you use f.identify, you see exactly the same problem. I hope this rl> information can help somehow. rl> rl> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:1

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:36:58 +0200, "Zvi Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rl> The problem in item #3, i.e., the extra space after the ´ (U+2019 rl> RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK) in http://jv.gilead.org.il/ still rl> persists. Yup. That, however, is not a characte

[ctwm] OK, I'm finally convinced (hey, it only took 3 years ;-)), I18N goes!

2007-01-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Yup. It's time. I'm removing all non-locale code and will clean up the whole I18N bazaar. In this day and age, I have no problem "forcing" people to upgrade. Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- R

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
I've solved the problem for my case (UTF-8 locale), simply by having text properties go through XmbTextPropertyToTextList() even when the type is STRING, instead of just copying the bytes. It simply converts the ISO-8859-1 (which is the normal encoding for STRING type text properties) string to UT

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-04 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:14:42 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> On Thu 04 Jan 2007 at 16:55:14 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: rhialto> > For the space-after-apostrophe problem, I'm guessing that rhialto> >

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-04 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
So, we can conclude that for STRING names, the result is shit while for COMPOUND_TEXT, we get something sensible most of the time. Sounds like the error would be in util.c:GetWMGetPropertyString(). Not sure what should be done though. For the space-after-apostrophe problem, I'm guessing that XmbT

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-03 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:30:13 +0100, Michael Widerkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mc> A simple menu item like this: mc> mc> menu "foo" mc> { mc> "räksmörgås" f.nop mc> } Aha, I inserted a similar one in my main menu, making sure it really becamse encode

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-03 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:32:59 +0100, Michael Widerkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mc> If I changed right back to LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1 and started CTWM mc> again with the same title font: mc> mc> "-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-12-120-75-75-m-70-iso106

Re: [ctwm] Re: Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-03 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:30:13 +0100, Michael Widerkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mc> I tried setting my LANG to "sv_SE.UTF-8", changed my title font to mc> "-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-12-120-75-75-m-70-iso10646-1" mc> and started ctwm. mc> mc> The

Re: [ctwm] Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-03 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:51:28 +0100, Michael Widerkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mc> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mc> mc> > I took a closer look and saw that Xmb* functions are already used. mc>

Re: [ctwm] Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-03 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:07:05 +0100 (CET), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: richard> It's time to start supporting for modern character sets/maps richard> in such things as titles and other things where ctwm displays ri

[ctwm] Supporting Unicode and so on UTF-8

2007-01-03 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hey, It's time to start supporting for modern character sets/maps in such things as titles and other things where ctwm displays strings. So I'm thinking on working on it in a separate branch (to be named later), and my plan is to have the result become part of ctwm 4.0. I've a question before st

Re: [ctwm] Weird workspace manager change

2006-12-24 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Ah, found it, it was a little (and very understandable) typo! I'm pushing a change that corrects it in a moment or two. Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [

Re: [ctwm] Weird workspace manager change

2006-12-24 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 24 Dec 2006 22:03:15 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> My first thought is that it should be one of the fields that rhialto> I moved from struct WorkSpaceWindow to struct WorkSpaceMgr: rhialto> rhialto> /* The fields below have been move

[ctwm] Weird workspace manager change

2006-12-24 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, Olaf, there's something weird happening with the workspace manager. I pulled your changes and recompiled (and there doesn't seem to be any more random rearrangement of window depth position, which I'm glad for), and there's something... weird going on with the workspace manager. I've the fo

Re: [ctwm] Depth-arrangement of windows is not preserved?

2006-12-22 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:45:15 -0600, "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: fullermd> > As long as the braces aren't the ugly GNU style, fullermd> > half-indented! Eew! fullermd> fullermd> No kidding. I don't know where to buy drugs that strong... Hmm, I li

Re: [ctwm] Depth-arrangement of windows is not preserved?

2006-12-22 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:35:00 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> Done. I was being careful, just in case somebody would say rhialto> "Nooo! You can't do that because of " The more the merrier, and wait until you discover the power of 'mtn disa

Re: [ctwm] Depth-arrangement of windows is not preserved?

2006-12-22 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Mmmm, Rhialto, you have write access to the repo, so if your patch works, I suggest committing and pushing so we can all try. I have noticed that random rearrangement of windows, but I've been too lazy to get bothered with it ;-). As to indentation, maybe it's time we get into some kind of agreem

[ctwm] TEST

2006-12-18 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Please ignore -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."

[ctwm] Re: _NET_NUMBER_OF_DESKTOPS

2006-12-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:38:23 +0100, Michael Widerkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mc> You can compare EWMH with the existing support in CTWM for mc> WM_HINTS and WM_NORMAL_HINTS. mc> mc> Here's a specification: mc> mc> http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/la

[ctwm] Re: _NET_NUMBER_OF_DESKTOPS

2006-12-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:52:05 +0100 (CET), Fabian Kreutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: fabian> A minimal example is (in python): fabian> from Xlib import display fabian> num = display.Display().intern_atom("_NET_NUMBER_OF_DESKTOPS") fabian> display.Display().screen().roo

[ctwm] Fw: Window Focus Opacity patch

2006-10-14 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
This was forwarded to me. Looks like a cool thing, but I wonder if that's the sort of thing we want in ctwm. I'd like to hear your opinion. Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte

[ctwm] Re: What's up with the ctwm website?

2006-08-24 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:27:57 +0200 (CEST), "J.O. Aho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: trizt> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Bob Willcox wrote: trizt> trizt> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:03:29AM +0200, J.O. Aho wrote: trizt> >> On Thu,

[ctwm] Re: What's up with the ctwm website?

2006-08-23 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:38:44 -0500, "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: fullermd> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:37:09AM +0200 I heard the voice of fullermd> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, and lo! it spake thus: fullermd> >

[ctwm] Re: What's up with the ctwm website?

2006-08-23 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:59:10 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: richard> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:05:04 -0500, Bob Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: richard> richar

[ctwm] Re: What's up with the ctwm website?

2006-08-23 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:05:04 -0500, Bob Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: bob> I am no longer able to access the ctwm website, http://ctwm.free.lp.se. bob> Has it moved? Nope. I've no idea what's happening, I suspect it's my router playing tricks. Unfortunately,

[ctwm] Re: Window positioning (and Gnome)

2006-07-20 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:59:37 +0200, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jvromans> What I would like to have (ideally) is a wrapper program jvromans> that can be run with: jvromans> jvromans> xgeo Why limit yourself to geometry settings? The safest would

[ctwm] Re: Window positioning

2006-07-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:08:44 +0200, Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kai.grossjohann> But perhaps the same applications that do not support kai.grossjohann> -geometry also do not support -xrm :-( Yeah, that's why I wondered if there was an environment kind

[ctwm] Re: Window positioning

2006-07-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:35:59 +0200, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jvromans> Can ctwm play a role in this -- maybe ctwm can handle a jvromans> geometry request? Or a wrapper program that waits until the jvromans> window is mapped, and then places/resizes it

[ctwm] Re: RandomPlacement

2006-06-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:45:42 +0200, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jvromans> RandomPlacement is a setting in ctwm's rc. jvromans> jvromans> Would it be possible to toggle this behaviour dynamically, i.e., with jvromans> a f.placement function? Do you mea

[ctwm] Re: Any hope of a GNOME linkage before The Second Coming???

2006-06-08 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:05:38 -0700, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kline> This is not intended as a criticism of CTWM--and I should be kline> hacking rather than asking. Still, any hopes of letting me use kline> the myriad goodies of CTWM _plus_ Gnome- an

[ctwm] Re: Will upgrade monotone some time next week

2006-05-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 22 May 2006 02:51:07 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: richard> I'm asking you to put it aside and start with a completely richard> new a fresh database. It dawned on me that I haven't e

[ctwm] Re: Will upgrade monotone some time next week

2006-05-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 May 2006 18:43:08 -0500, "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: fullermd> Well, I'm not sure where it got that server name. There's fullermd> no mtn server running on repository.lp.se; Well, just half true. There's an older version running there

[ctwm] Re: Will upgrade monotone some time next week

2006-05-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 May 2006 18:05:18 -0500, "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: fullermd> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 12:48:45PM +0200 I heard the voice of fullermd> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, and lo! it spake thus: fullermd>

[ctwm] Re: repository has a double-free() bug

2006-05-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 May 2006 14:42:00 -0400, Todd Kover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kovert> > Didn't it help enough to make tmp_win->HiliteImage NULL? kovert> kovert> no. It still ended up freeing memory that was already freed. kovert> I'm not quite clear on where it got th

[ctwm] Re: repository has a double-free() bug

2006-05-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
OK, I've a question: why do you remove the code entirely? Didn't it help enough to make tmp_win->HiliteImage NULL? In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 May 2006 13:20:07 -0400, Todd Kover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kovert> --- add_window.cefc8288ef604525373100ce0eb1e04654bc7e6d4 kov

[ctwm] Re: repository has a double-free() bug

2006-05-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 May 2006 13:20:07 -0400, Todd Kover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kovert> note that this is against the cvs repository, and 3.7 does not kovert> suffer from this. Uhmm, are you aware that the CVS repository has been deprecated for a while now? I guess it's

[ctwm] Re: Will upgrade monotone some time next week

2006-05-20 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Upgrade done. For those following the development on the notification mailing lists, it will have to wait a couple of days. You will now need to do the following: - if you have any local changes, get a diff - put aside your current database (keep it as a backup for a few days) - put aside

[ctwm] Will upgrade monotone some time next week

2006-05-18 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, I'm in the process of upgrading the monotone server to version 0.26 and moving the database to a new host with better connectivity. This will happen on Saturday, May 20th. This means that everyone that currently has write access to the central repo (at repository.lp.se) needs to commit and p

[ctwm] Re: Wondering about a Debian patch

2006-05-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 15 May 2006 09:25:11 -0500, "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: fullermd> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:05:45PM +0200 I heard the voice of fullermd> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, and lo! it spake thus: fullermd>

[ctwm] Wondering about a Debian patch

2006-05-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, I took a look at the Debian ctwm package source, and sifted through their diff. On of them is the following, and I'm not sure I entirely understand the impact, so I'm not sure if I can apply it. Would a few of you be willing to try it out and report back? --- ctwm-3.7.orig/workmgr.c +++ ctw

[ctwm] Re: [repository.lp.se #116] AutoReply: CTWM man page corrections

2006-04-22 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:47:09 +0200, "Ross Combs via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: ctwm-bugs> I never heard back about this patch. Is it acceptable or ctwm-bugs> do you want me to make changes? Hi, I've been noticably sloppy, it seems. This change has been applie

[ctwm] Re: ctwm and virtual screens

2006-04-22 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:50:34 -0400, Todd Kover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kovert> > I imagine you're going to do more work, do you want write kovert> > access to the repository? kovert> kovert> I'm hoping to run through my list over the next few months if kovert

[ctwm] Re: ctwm and virtual screens

2006-04-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:31:02 -0400, Todd Kover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kovert> I've run into a few other issues that I fixed with the attached patch: Patch applied, committed and puched. I imagine you're going to do more work, do you want write access to the rep

[ctwm] Re: window title with nonascii characters

2006-02-20 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:22:12 +0200, "Zvi Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rl> Hi, I have a problem with ctwm window title when it contains rl> nonascii charaters. More precisely, I am using en_US.UTF-8 locale, rl> and browse with firefox the my homepage at rl> ttp:

[ctwm] How well does CTWM work with some desktop systems?

2006-02-06 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi everyone, I'm using CTWM as is, and have never really been attracted by desktop systems like Gnome and KDE, and possibly XFCE, so I really don't know too much how well CTWM works with them. I know there are things we've done to at least make it work with Gnome, and there's been some talking of

[ctwm] Re: Small installation issues, and a f.resize bug

2006-01-31 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:23:05 +0100, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> On Mon 30 Jan 2006 at 17:03:47 +0100, Rhialto wrote: rhialto> > Ok, I'll commit it later, with some additional cleanup rhialto> > which I have done in the meantime. rhialto> rhialto> Don

[ctwm] Re: [repository.lp.se #114] Folding menus

2006-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:54:43 +0100 (CET), "J.O. Aho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: trizt> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: trizt> trizt> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:5

[ctwm] Re: Small installation issues, and a f.resize bug

2006-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:40:42 +0200, "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nyh> I didn't comment on scons because I never heard of it, or saw any nyh> free software using it. http://www.scons.org/refer.php (and I haven't added my own projects yet, because they're

[ctwm] Re: Small installation issues, and a f.resize bug

2006-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:32:35 +0100 (CET), "J.O. Aho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: trizt> I think there was someone else who already volunteered to make trizt> an autoconfig version, so if that person wants to have it, trizt> should be he who sees to it to be up to date

[ctwm] Re: [repository.lp.se #114] Folding menus

2006-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:55:56 +0100, Michael Widerkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mc> Many window managers don't fold menus that extend below the mc> screen. Instead, they simply display the menu slightly higher, so mc> that the menu window can fit on the visible sc

[ctwm] Re: Small installation issues, and a f.resize bug

2006-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:17:48 +0100 (CET), "J.O. Aho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: trizt> Wouldn't it be possible to provide both? Keep the Imake as the trizt> official one as it's better supported in most systems that can trizt> use ctwm and provide the automake stuff

[ctwm] Re: Small installation issues, and a f.resize bug

2006-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:11:16 +0200, "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nyh> Yes, but individual users are no longer familiar with this nyh> process (which very few programs use these days), so it can't nyh> hurt to mention this in the README. This is all I ask

[ctwm] Re: Small installation issues, and a f.resize bug

2006-01-29 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:25:06 +0100 (CET), "J.O. Aho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: trizt> I never have run "make install.man", but still I have the ctwm trizt> man pages for 3.7. Teach us your magic! I've looked several times in the resulting Makefile now, and there's

[ctwm] Re: Small installation issues, and a f.resize bug

2006-01-29 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:59:31 +0200, "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nyh> * I couldn't find in the CTWM site - not even in the change log nyh>- any release date. This is very confusing: is the version I nyh>decided to download (3.7) recent? How much

[ctwm] Re: More leaks

2005-10-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:05:58 +0300, "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nyh> Now we arrive at three leaks that might be related, and might be nyh> some sort of attempt to do image caching, and not exactly a nyh> leak. However, if this is an attempt to do cachin

[ctwm] Cosmetic SqueezeTitle bug...

2005-09-29 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, playing with SqueezeTitle, I noticed some disturbing dots in the frame. It seems like the code to draw the frame isn't quite as careful as it could be, when the title bar is squeezed (it doesn't happen when I don't use SqueezeTitle, or I would have noticed long ago). See http://ctwm.free.lp.

[ctwm] Re: Movetitlebar fearure - diff & screenshot

2005-09-29 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:25:21 +0200, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> http://www.falu.nl/~rhialto/ctwm-movetitlebar.diff I'm having too much fun with this, quickly moving the title back and forth. *thud* *thud* *thud* goes the title... OK, enough silline

[ctwm] Snapshot

2005-09-28 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, I just placed a snapshot of the development branch in http://ctwm.free.lp.se/preview/, called ctwm-3.8devel.20050929.tar.gz. It contains all the corrections Olaf has made and a couple of small tweaks of my own. Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See h

[ctwm] How are things with the "OOo bug"?

2005-09-27 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
There was some talk about a disappearing and/or reappearing window or menu when using OOo, and a request was sent to their report system. Has anyone heard anything since? Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for detai

[ctwm] Re: ctwm memory leaks?

2005-09-27 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:58:31 +0300, "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nyh> P.S. This issue brings me to thinking that I need to try some sort of nyh> LD_PRELOAD trick to enforce my malloc/free/etc wrappers also on shared nyh> libraries used by ctwm. I'll try

[ctwm] Re: ctwm memory leaks?

2005-09-26 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:11:48 +0300, "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nyh> These are just two example leaks I found - I can quite easily nyh> point to more. The question is - is anyone interested that I nyh> continue to point to more leaks as I find them? I

[ctwm] Movable title bars (was: Re: Problem with OOo beta 2)

2005-09-04 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:51:46 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rhialto> I am using the most recent ctwm version, with the addition of rhialto> a patch of my own (for movable title bars). Thanks for the reminder, I was planning on trying your change and see how it works

[ctwm] Re: Congrats on 3.7!

2005-07-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:24:49 -0700, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kline> This is just my opinion, but until CTWM can run both Gnome and kline> KDE apps easily, flawlessly, methinks that CTWM will have a kline> limited reach. Can I run, say, "enlightenment

[ctwm] Re: Congrats on 3.7!

2005-07-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:27:40 -0500, Adam Gurno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: adam.gurno> http://freshmeat.net/project-stats/view/1599/ adam.gurno> adam.gurno> According to the stats, it's the best day CTWM's had in a while... Oh my, look at it sky-rocketing :-) Cheer

[ctwm] Re: Congrats on 3.7!

2005-07-24 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:42:58 -0700, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kline> On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 05:37:41AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: kline> > Uhm, I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say. You kl

[ctwm] Re: Congrats on 3.7!

2005-07-24 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:46:53 -0500, Adam Gurno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: adam.gurno> For that matter, we should update the freshmeat CTWM entry. adam.gurno> http://freshmeat.net/projects/ctwm/ Very good point. I've just updated certain crucial files on the web sit

[ctwm] Re: Congrats on 3.7!

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:53:55 -0700, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kline> To every contributor to 3.7, hat's off! On behalf of all contributors, thank you :-) kline> It is outstanding++; And there's still things to do with it. Like adapting to the new Gn

[ctwm] ANNOUNCE: ctwm 3.7 released

2005-07-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
CTWM 3.7 is released! I've only released the source tarball, available from the web page. Binary distributions are welcome and will be published as soon as I have the time to make the appropriate changes. Changes from version 3.6 to 3.7 --- 1 - Workspace c

[ctwm] Re: Preparing for a release.

2005-07-18 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:25:32 -0700, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kline> Where is the FreeBSD port or tarball? I leave that to the FreeBSD folks, just as I leave the Debian dist to Debian. Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free s

Preparing for a release.

2005-07-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
I've waited way too long, so I've decided it's time. I'm releasing ctwm 3.7 tonight. Any more issues will be for 3.7.1 or something like that. Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte

Re: Done pondering a change of SCM...

2005-05-27 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 28 May 2005 00:00:23 +0200, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> On Thu 26 May 2005 at 21:18:28 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: rhialto> > # If you want write access, you have to create a key pair rhialto> > #

Release delay

2005-05-27 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
I promised a delay and missed it. The main reason is that I was reminded to fix the VMS build, and had to spend some time doing that. The VMS build has been changed to use descrip.local (copy from descrip.local-template) which mimics the Imakefile.local functionality. I looks to me like I got it

Done pondering a change of SCM...

2005-05-26 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi all, I made my decision a few days ago, and have now moved the whole ctwm development tree to a monotone database. Here's a crash course on how to do things: #- # Initialise database monotone --db=YOUR_DATABASE_DIRECTORY/db.c

Re: Possible focus buglet

2005-05-21 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 21 May 2005 17:48:20 +0200, Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rhialto> On Fri 20 May 2005 at 10:32:28 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote: rhialto> > Now switch to another workspace, and move the cursor to a rhialto> > location that falls (in the original workspace)

Time for a release.

2005-05-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
It feels to me like ctwm has now matured enough for a 3.7 release. That will happen tomorrow. After that, we can probably give Anthony's Gnome panel problem some focus (maybe making a 3.7.1 release pretty soon). Branden, I include you in announcements like this so you can prepare yourself for Deb

Re: Pondering a change of SCM...

2005-05-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 17 May 2005 09:42:02 +0200, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jvromans> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jvromans> jvromans> > It can be pointed out that after years of development, jvromans&

Re: Pondering a change of SCM...

2005-05-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 16 May 2005 11:15:43 +0200, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jvromans> There have been several 'improvements' for SCCS/RCS/CVS, but jvromans> none of them really survived. That's why I would be very jvromans> careful selecting a non-mainstream SCM. O

Pondering a change of SCM...

2005-05-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi all, over time, I've grown a bit irritated over the misfeatures of CVS, and I've been looking long and hard for something to use instead. My requirements were to have a networking model, something that's not overcomplicated to use (so don't suggest arch), has a decent branching a merging model

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Releasing ctwm 3.7 beta5.

2005-05-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 14 May 2005 12:21:22 +0200, Derik van Zuetphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: dz> Here are a couple of typos, duplicates, ommissions, etc. that I found. Patch applied. Thanks! Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http

  1   2   3   >