on't want to replicate the camera
JPG look or the Lightroom look. I want the look that I want.
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 18:46, Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Funny, because when I used DT as my main raw editor I used drawn
masks a
lot (!), but since I have
Funny, because when I used DT as my main raw editor I used drawn masks a
lot (!), but since I have a LR license and noticed how well and fast
sharpness, detail, highlight and shadow recovery work, I have never
missed it. ;)
Op 18-02-2021 om 22:50 schreef Terry Pinfold:
I own licences for Ligh
I would be happy to pay for a Linux alternative!!!
I used Aftershot Pro for a few years, but development stopped and image
quality was poor, but using it was a joy and it was very fast.
Op 17-02-2021 om 11:07 schreef Martin Straeten:
If you're just looking for a free/linux Lightroom alternati
I started this topic/conversation about the GUI, but at first it was
just a question, if the order could be changed to make it feel more
logical and pleasant to me to work with. I now understand the reasoning
behind this and that it should not be changed. But underneath there is
more I must adm
That is a very good example! :)
1.
Pixelpipeline/module order/background operations in DT:
First the socks, then the shoes.
2.
Me:
First I choose which shoes to wear today, than I go look for soms socks
that fit with the shoes, if I can find them.
So I do not want to mess up the very logica
program to learn.
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 21:44, Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Trying DT again I notice that I cannot reorder the modules, except when
they also have an effect on the order in the pipeline.
Intuitevely I work from top to bottom, exposure, whit
I'm sorry, I do understand why this is important and cannot and should
not be changed! But what I do not understand is why the visual order in
the Darkroom cannot be changed. As I see it from a visual/users point of
view is that they are like menu items, independent from the actual order
in the
just workflow stuff - without any generalizable logical context.
Your "intuitively" refers to a workflow you're used from other tools. If
you want to use darktable "intuitively" you need to learn about
darktables pipeline...
Am Mo., 15. Feb. 2021 um 11:44 Uhr schrieb K
Trying DT again I notice that I cannot reorder the modules, except when
they also have an effect on the order in the pipeline.
Intuitevely I work from top to bottom, exposure, white balance,
contrast, then cropping etc. and at the end things like sharpening and
vignetting. Now the modules have
Well, I think I started this kind of 'topic' several times, because this
is also my experience with using DT for a few years and one of the big
reasons why I'm using LR for now (shame shame). I always try a new DT
version for a reason to switch back, but LR sharpness is better and much
easier a
I think that was me :). I bought a new pc (64Gb, M.2 drive i7 9700, 8
cores, 2 4Tb fast disks in Raid 1) and DT in Linux Mint was blazing fast
compared to DT on Windows (same machine when I decided I wanted to use
Windows + LR for a while).
Op 31-08-2020 om 21:56 schreef Top Rock Photography
DT is great :), the only two things that currently hold me back is that
I still think LR overall does a better job in highlight / shadow
recovery and detail/sharpness. I just played with an image of wooden
beach poles and LR gives me more detail and edge sharpness, even when
adding sharpness +
, and cancel within the first 14 days!
Sincerely,
Karim Hosein
Top Rock Photography
754.999.1652
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 07:45, Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
…I don't
think I will ever need Prophoto though, but in case I do I can always…
*subcribe
No not yet, I just tried one of the images posted there but I don't
understand how it works. The help pages of that website are not loading.
I have edited one of those images but don't understand how I can upload
my version.
Have you tried posting some problematic images as PlayRaw on
discu
but they are mainly Mac, some on Windows, but never on Linux.)
__ __
Marc.
__ __
*Van:*Terry Pinfold mailto:tpinf...@gmail.com>>
*Verzonden:* dinsdag 25 augustus 2020 0:24
*Aan:* Kneops mailto:kne...@gmail.com>>
*CC:* darktable forum mailto:darktable-user@lists.d
Hi Marc,
You know, I don't mind fiddling around with many modules to get the best
possible image , if I have the time and it is only one or two images.
But when I went to for instance horse jumping competition, a city trip
or whatever, with lots of different lighting conditions, and I have 100
Almost my path in raw software. Started with RT and DT, than found
Aftershot Pro (= Bibble) which was decent enough but no development
(indeed Corel fucked up the original software and are deceiving new
users), than back to DT for about 2 years until I tried LR. Not lost but
instead remarkably
True! I'm using LR now for going through my archive and I agree that at
some point it can get restrictive, but as I said earlier, for 99% of my
images it works very well and very fast. I don't like the library system
though, so at some point I will import everything in DT.
Op 24-08-2020 om 19
A penny worth of thoughts :) More than that.
Yes it could be time, but I just want to add that I'm in no way new to
editing software and have switched many times.
I started in the nineties with Photoshop, then used many brands of
software while working in a design company until I switched to L
re that was not
possible with Lightroom.
So I agree with the sentiment: great and impressive work by the
development team!
On 2020-08-20 09:38, Kneops wrote:
I agree, it is a marvellous piece of work, unbelievable really and I
love it but not use it as much as I would like to. And I would neve
oo of course. It must be said those Tiff's are 2.5 times the size of
the Raw's.
Marc.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Kneops
Verzonden: vrijdag 21 augustus 2020 9:45
Aan: darktable-user@lists.darktable.org
Onderwerp: Re: [darktable-user] Darktable 3.2, a short review
My current re
Yes this is possible and I have used them for years, but it is much
harder to get the same results as compared to LR. I worked with DT for a
few years and then tried LR trial version. I did not like the fact that
I had to use the subscription model, but for now it gives me much better
and quick
My current reason for using LR is that I'm re-editing all my digital
images I find worthwhile saving, starting from 2002, and then export
them in 3 different ways: jpeg small for web, RGB and Adobe RGB high
quality jpegs. Those I will keep on several backup drives.
After I'm finished (and LR i
@jason and @pascal,
I agree, it is a marvellous piece of work, unbelievable really and I
love it but not use it as much as I would like to. And I would never
recommend it to friends :(. Even for me as a freelance photographer (20+
years of experience) it feels like it is made for techies, not
Thanks for the link :)
Op 12-08-2020 om 09:45 schreef KOVÁCS István:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 09:42, Kneops wrote:
I just installed 3.2.1 and now when I switch back from an image in
Darkroom to Lighttable, the Darkroom image is still visible under the
thumbnails. Is that how it is supposed to
I just installed 3.2.1 and now when I switch back from an image in
Darkroom to Lighttable, the Darkroom image is still visible under the
thumbnails. Is that how it is supposed to work?
https://i.imgur.com/hNvZVe3.jpg
d
Last week I updated to Linux Mint 20 and with it came DT version 3.0.1.
Now I can't add tags. I can attach/detach tags, but not type new ones in
that field.
Also the module seems to be a little too wide, a button is hiding behind
the scrollbar.
https://i.imgur.com/z3ESrBS.png
_
Defenitely Linux!
I have compared both on the same pc. I first installed Linux on this new
and fast pc, wondering how well LR would work under Virtual Box. Pretty
good but not fast enough, and I compared it with DT. DT was blazing
fast! Unbelievable and unprecendented Trump would call it ;).
h more fun than LR. But I can understand
that some people will have a specific program such as LR and expect all
other programs to produce identical pictures.
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 22:41, Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I agree, except I would really urge the d
I agree, except I would really urge the developers (from a humble
position and very grateful for what they have accomplished so far) to
not forget improvements on image quality! 'Priority on image editing' is
good, but image quality is final. I don't really like LR, but I'm using
it anyway beca
I will wait patiently for Pascal ;)
In the meantime I first installed DT 2.8 on my new 'Windows' pc when I
still had Linux Mint installed on it, just to see what the new cpu has
to offer DT (i7 9700K, 32Gb ram, no overclocking, geforce 1660 super).
(I wrote about going to use LR on Windows for
I only edit few images outside of DT because most of the time they don't
need extra editing. But when I do edit images in Gimp, DT saves them as
tiff file next to the original raw file, so they are 'linked'.
I tag images at the end when all editing is done, so then I won't have
issues with unt
I will try those modules and the new filmic once I have installed
version 3. Thanks for the suggestions.
About the lua-script, I think that's used when resizing the images but
not for the original full size exports?
Op 07-01-2020 om 11:17 schreef Bernhard:
Kneops schrieb am 07.01.
I was not sure if I wanted to comment on the release of DT 3, but I will
do it anyway because I have been using it for the last two years
extensively and currently have 154.000 images in the database, so I have
some experience with it. I have not used DT 3 yet, but read the
changelog with all t
Yes it has! I'm using two of their profiles for my Pixma 9500 printer
and the .icc file for proofing (in Gimp).
Op 17-12-2019 om 20:45 schreef Pascal Obry:
Le mardi 17 décembre 2019 à 10:35 -0800, David Vincent-Jones a écrit :
I am using TurboPrint with custom profiles. The profiles do not h
I'm defenitely not a programmer ;), but if, wouldn't it then be better
to use image magick 'underneath' the DT sharpening tool, replacing the
current sharpening method?
Op 14-10-19 om 13:48 schreef Bernhard:
I'm not a programmer but I am wondering if it would be possible to write
a lua scrip
ef Remco Viëtor:
On vendredi 11 octobre 2019 21:22:20 CEST Kneops wrote:
It's been a while since I asked a question about how to get the best
sharpness and detail in DT, in this case using RAF files from my Fuji
XT1 and 2. Sometimes the sharpness is good enough for me, but I just
tested Capture
0 -strip -quality 85 -interlace Plane
-colorspace RGB --resize 900x900 -sharpen 7x2.0
all the way to
convert -sampling-factor 4:2:0 -strip -quality 85 -interlace Plane
-colorspace RGB --resize 900x900 -sharpen 1x2.0
Finally, I decide which one to keep.
Thanks
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:22:20 +0200
K
It's been a while since I asked a question about how to get the best
sharpness and detail in DT, in this case using RAF files from my Fuji
XT1 and 2. Sometimes the sharpness is good enough for me, but I just
tested Capture One for Fuji cameras (free for Fuji users), and compared
a few images be
Hi Sam,
That would be a very welcome addition to DT :). I asked for this many
times because some of my clients demand specific fields. Most of those
fields are the standard IPTC Core (or IPTC Extension) fields that LR
uses. For instance the University I sometimes work for asks for these
field
I don't think that is the way to go for simple but decent sharpening.
Just like in Gimp or any other (raw) software, the current slider should
be enough for 99% of all sharpening. But there is something in this
module imo is not working exactly right.
Op 07-08-19 om 03:49 schreef Jason Polak:
I'm also struggling with sharpening in DT from time to time. Lately I
just couldn't get my images (Nikon D850) to look sharp, so I ran the
images through the Iridient N-Transformer which converts them to .dng
images. Those images were very sharp and detailed. In DT I tried to
mimick that sharpn
difference, because they are both RGB and
the display profile is intended to also show RGB (99,5% AdobeRGB).
Why do I see this difference?
Op 12-06-19 om 07:56 schreef Remco Viëtor:
On mardi 11 juin 2019 21:57:55 CEST Kneops wrote:
I'm afraid I'm once more lost in the world of color (pro
When I have an image with an extra instance of for example the Exposure
module, and I copy paste this edit to a new image, I cannot delete
Exposure I (the new instance). The options (like copy, duplicate,
delete) are not clickable. What I CAN delete is the original instance,
but not the copy. T
Hi Kofa,
I shoot raw mainly, sometimes together with jpeg in higher ISO because I
find the noise reduction of the jpegs produced within the camera better
than in DT (shooting with Nikon D850 or Fuji XT2).
Op 17-06-19 om 20:52 schreef KOVÁCS István:
When I have my display in Gamut Checking
tters, sRGB or Adobe
RGB. Aat least on my screen I can't tell the difference...
Op 12-06-19 om 07:56 schreef Remco Viëtor:
On mardi 11 juin 2019 21:57:55 CEST Kneops wrote:
I'm afraid I'm once more lost in the world of color (profiles).
I've read al lot in the manual about
rs that are out of gamut.
I don't understand how this works.
I have a Dell U2713H monitor that covers 99% of Adobe RGB.
Op 12-06-19 om 21:23 schreef KOVÁCS István:
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 21:59, Kneops wrote:
I have a Nikon D850 set to Adobe RGB,
If you shoot raw, colour space in
I'm afraid I'm once more lost in the world of color (profiles).
I've read al lot in the manual about color settings, but just don't know
what the right settings need to be.
I have a Nikon D850 set to Adobe RGB, and I had my monitor calibrated
with Spider 4, and DT uses this icc file. I checked
'-Mset Xmp.dc.creator =' .. image.creator .. '"',
'-Mset Xmp.dc.publisher "' .. image.publisher .. '"',
'-Mset Xmp.dc.rights "' .. image.rights .. '"',
filename
},
In your original code you h
Hi Stefan,
Got your message :)
I will go and play with metadata for a while and if I have questions
about the script I will let you know. Thanks!
Jack
Op 20-05-19 om 12:39 schreef dt-l...@stefan-klinger.de:
Sorry: Please don't send screenshots of code! Never do this. Because
I (or any r
schreef Lorenzo Bolzani:
Il giorno dom 19 mag 2019 alle ore 20:11 Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
Hi Pascal. Thanks for your reply :). So it is not a matter of
'just' adding more fields to the current module. I was not aware
of that, as a non-coder
with DT
doing one thing and something like Digikam or XNView for the metadata.
But for now I'm going to use XNView in cases I need the extra meta data
fields and add them to the exported files.
Op 19-05-19 om 21:21 schreef Anton Aylward:
On 19/05/2019 11:04, Kneops wrote:
So your p
room 99% of the time and don't need anything else, while
years ago they had to do everything with Photoshop. Now Photoshop (and
Gimp) are primarily for manipulating images or for people working in the
design industry.
Op 19-05-19 om 15:33 schreef Anton Aylward:
On 19/05/2019 08:42, Kneop
e, only to use the stamp or healing brush.
Op 19-05-19 om 14:32 schreef Anton Aylward:
On 19/05/2019 06:05, dt-l...@stefan-klinger.de wrote:
Kneops (2019-May-19, excerpt):
I just noticed this and I wonder how I can prevent this, or perhaps their is
a good reason for this? It will probably no
I just noticed this and I wonder how I can prevent this, or perhaps
their is a good reason for this? It will probably not make the size of a
jpeg much larger, but it just doesn't seem to be information that needs
to go into a jpeg.
___
mobile device, apologies for typos
PGP key: http://tinyurl.com/2016PGPKEY
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:05 PM Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I asked this before and there are a number of replies about this. See
below. Unfortunately it seems that almost no one wants or n
Hi Anton. Just to point out that this is about adding XMP information to
images, not changing Exif.
Op 14-05-19 om 00:21 schreef Anton Aylward:
On 13/05/2019 07:06, mick crane wrote:
windows there's
https://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ exiftools
http://u88.n24.queensu.ca/~bogda
hout cost it is full
open source.
On 2019-05-13 11:58 a.m., Kneops wrote:
I did not know ResourceSpace, but have you seen their prices?
Currently I'm using Photodeck and busy to edit/export/upload all my
photos.
If only DT would... 😥😉
https://www.jacktummers.com/
Op 13-05-19 om 20
rated export/import to a
dedicated open source DAM like ResourceSpace.
This would allow personal modifications by the user to suit all needs.
On 2019-05-13 11:00 a.m., Remco Viëtor wrote:
On lundi 13 mai 2019 18:35:07 CEST Kneops wrote:
I noticed DK is using exiv2 and offers (way too) many XMP f
I noticed DK is using exiv2 and offers (way too) many XMP fields. A lot
of them are perhaps nice for museums and such, a photographer needs only
a small number. A friend who already works for a news paper uses LR and
one default field is Job identifier, so the administration knows where
to send
You're right Bernhard, it seems that XMP is going to replace IPTC and
some XMP fields already 'translate' some of these IPTC fields into the
new standard, which is XMP.
Op 13-05-19 om 17:55 schreef Bernhard:
That said it would be more interesting to add more of the xmp-fields
for a more co
data
editing. But I'd like to comment on one important misconception:
Kneops (2019-May-13, excerpt):
> I really would like to be able to do this in one program (DT)
This desire, voiced by many users and not limited to DT, has led the
IT world to bloated, unmaintainable
2019 at 2:05 PM Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I asked this before and there are a number of replies about this. See
below. Unfortunately it seems that almost no one wants or needs
this???
Imho it is so basic to photography and DAM.
It's the most impor
I asked this before and there are a number of replies about this. See
below. Unfortunately it seems that almost no one wants or needs this???
Imho it is so basic to photography and DAM.
It's the most important part in DT that I and is now forcing me to buy a
second computer with Windows and a s
button. If you are using a luarc file, i.e.
~/.config/darktable/luarc, then make sure it has the line require
"contrib/gimp".
Bill
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 7:49 AM Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I wanted to export an image to Gimp and saw that is was not there
re it has the line require
"contrib/gimp".
Bill
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 7:49 AM Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I wanted to export an image to Gimp and saw that is was not there
anymore in the export presets. So I checked the LUA tab in the DT
preference
I wanted to export an image to Gimp and saw that is was not there
anymore in the export presets. So I checked the LUA tab in the DT
preference window and it seems all LUA scripts are removed, except two.
I checked the LUA folder under .config/.../LUA, but all scripts are
still there. How can I
Although I'm using DT only for one year now, it has become my only raw
converter. Before that I used several programs including Aftershot Pro
and Lightroom (in Virtial Box on Linux Mint). I never considered it
software for 'a small Linux cadre'. It is much more than that. Many
professional phot
r 2019 at 13:50, Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Really? 😐.
Than this is the first one for me today and I wonder how this is
possible. Is this programmed into version 2.6.1? I can't imagine.
I really thought I was hacked...
Op 01-04-19 om 14:47 schreef C
Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 13:44, Kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I just opened DT for the first time today (version 2.6.1) and I got a
black screen and at the top some digital numbers (4 digits, all
set to
zero: ) and the words High Score, as if it was some ver
I just opened DT for the first time today (version 2.6.1) and I got a
black screen and at the top some digital numbers (4 digits, all set to
zero: ) and the words High Score, as if it was some very old MSDOS
game starting up. I quickly quit DT and restarted a few times and never
got to see
ble option.
With DT 2.4 serie, it used to work. Not with 2.6.0 and not with 2.6.1
Is the problem with DT or with libgphoto?
sknahT
vyS
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 12:11:42 +0100
Kneops wrote:
I noticed that the images are captured and saved on disk, it's just
that DT freezes and I have to quit and re
iable option.
With DT 2.4 serie, it used to work. Not with 2.6.0 and not with 2.6.1
Is the problem with DT or with libgphoto?
sknahT
vyS
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 12:11:42 +0100
Kneops wrote:
I noticed that the images are captured and saved on disk, it's just
that DT freezes and I have to quit a
Just scant everything without tethering and on the card. That works too
ofcourse, but tethering is a nice option.
I use a fast Sony XQD card reader, so transfering doesn't take too long.
Op 17-03-19 om 15:42 schreef Anton Aylward:
My experiences with tethering using Linux openSuse, and with
03-19 om 11:27 schreef Pascal Obry:
Le dimanche 17 mars 2019 à 11:22 +0100, Kneops a écrit :
Any ideas about this?
No, last time I tested tethering with my D850 it worked just fine. Zero
issue I was even impressed by this as I had mixed experience with
previous camera and dt ve
I connect the camera to my pc (Linux Mint, all software latest version),
then unmount the camera form my desktop, then start tethering. I see the
first image that is in front of my Micro Nikon lens in Darktable, I can
adjust the position of the slide and then hit the Capture button. The
picture
Thanks for all the replies.
I did not report it as a bug yet because I first wanted to check with
others if they experience the same problem.
Good to hear there is already a fix so fast! :)
Op 14-03-19 om 20:43 schreef KOVÁCS István:
Good news: someone has raised the issue and Aurelien has
x27;t believe this is normal. but perhaps it is? That means Filmic
could only be used at the end of editing?
It happens with Nikon and Fuji raw images.
Op 14-03-19 om 16:18 schreef Remco Viëtor:
On jeudi 14 mars 2019 15:42:01 CET Kneops wrote:
I just updated DT to 2.6.1, tried one of the F
al and one much darker.
It seems to be happening at random. It can be okay for a few times, than
darker, then i have to switch it off and on again.
Op 14-03-19 om 16:18 schreef Remco Viëtor:
On jeudi 14 mars 2019 15:42:01 CET Kneops wrote:
I just updated DT to 2.6.1, tried one of the Filmic p
I notice that it only happens after applying Exposure after Filmic and
the clicking Filmic again (on/off/on)
Op 14-03-19 om 15:47 schreef Patrick Shanahan:
* Kneops [03-14-19 10:44]:
I just updated DT to 2.6.1, tried one of the Filmic presets, turning it on
an off and on etc.
Doing
15:47 schreef Patrick Shanahan:
* Kneops [03-14-19 10:44]:
I just updated DT to 2.6.1, tried one of the Filmic presets, turning it on
an off and on etc.
Doing this, the images become too dark suddenly (bottom half of the
screenshot), then the next time I turn it on it's normal again (top h
I just updated DT to 2.6.1, tried one of the Filmic presets, turning it
on an off and on etc.
Doing this, the images become too dark suddenly (bottom half of the
screenshot), then the next time I turn it on it's normal again (top half
of the image) etc. I can do this multiple times and it will
Okay, thanks. I will look at comments on Mint forums, because even 2.6
is not available yet in the software manager or synaptic.
Op 06-03-19 om 10:37 schreef Pascal Obry:
Le mercredi 06 mars 2019 à 10:31 +0100, Kneops a écrit :
I'm using Linux Mint 19.1 and I have not received any u
I'm using Linux Mint 19.1 and I have not received any update
notification, like I'm used to with all other software I have installed.
So I'm still on version 2.4.2.
Do I need to use your software source to get it?
Op 06-03-19 om 09:44 schreef Pascal Obry:
The darktable 2.6.1 release is out.
I've had this many times before when copying settings from one image to
another, but not like this...
Somewhere in the middle of editing a series of images I added a new
instance of the Exposure module to underexposure certain parts of the
image. It was correctly added with the name Exposure 1
I added this as a feature request. I would suggest that everyone that
finds this a usefull addition too, to reply on that feature request.
https://redmine.darktable.org/issues/12508
Op 27-12-18 om 19:33 schreef David Vincent-Jones:
I would find this a useful addition ... I find myself s
Hmmm, can't find the place on the redmin page where to post a feature
request. How do I do this? 🙄
Op 27-12-18 om 19:44 schreef kneops:
Me too :) Already asked this a few weeks ago. William then replied
about his coding this feature, so it would be a good idea to submit
this as a fe
Me too :) Already asked this a few weeks ago. William then replied about
his coding this feature, so it would be a good idea to submit this as a
feature request. I will do this and then others can reply to that
request with a 'yes I want this too!' kind of reply ;).
Op 27-12-18 om 19:33 sc
Never knew about this 'trick'. Thanks very much, because I too had many
difficulties with the font size, therefor making lots or errors when
adding metadata. I've now set it to 120, although 108 was also pretty
decent.
Op 25-12-18 om 11:33 schreef parafin:
Try setting screen_dpi_overwrite t
g the folder is displayed crossed out.
Right click on it, search folder and your pictures are back.
Am 10.12.18 um 16:25 schrieb kneops:
Hi Matej,
I meant sometime like this, where the folders can be marked, not the
images, so that I know which folders I still have to process.
I believe yo
Currently I'm working on a lot of new folders and older imported
folders. When scrolling through all the folders I wished there was a way
to mark folders, like /done/ or /in progress/. That would make it much
easier to keep an overview of what work still needs to be done.
Is this already possi
1-18 om 21:27 schreef Ulrich Pegelow:
Maybe a problem with your installation of lensfun on which darktable's
lens correction relies. I would try to update the lensfun database by
running lensfun-update-data.
Ulrich
Am 20.11.18 um 20:59 schrieb kneops:
I can't. The dropdown only shows
est wishes
Ulrich
Am 20.11.18 um 20:40 schrieb kneops:
I'm puzzled why this lens correction is not working.
The lens as noted in the lens correction module is correct, I also
get the same information when using exiv2.
But correction is not working. This lens is the well known 'older&#
I'm puzzled why this lens correction is not working.
The lens as noted in the lens correction module is correct, I also get
the same information when using exiv2.
But correction is not working. This lens is the well known 'older'
version, so not the newer VR version.
Also, I cannot choose anoth
I always use Geeqie (on Linux). Great and fast image viewer (including
raw) and supports wildcards.
Op 09-11-18 om 02:21 schreef August Schwerdfeger:
Can anybody recommend any good batch-renaming packages? I am
specifically looking to replace a homebrew Python script that uses
exposure-comp
I
think I was bitten by something like that once.
Best regards,
Guillermo
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:34 AM kneops <mailto:kne...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Beneath was my first question, about export problem of meta data.
I found out that it is the number of steps in the history that is
I'm not sure what the problem is, perhaps a miscommunication?
I'm happy with how it works. If there is still some data in the
database, I'm fine with that :)
Op 25-09-18 om 15:13 schreef Patrick Shanahan:
* dt-l...@stefan-klinger.de [09-25-18 08:42]:
kneops (2018-Sep-25,
dt-l...@stefan-klinger.de:
kneops (2018-Sep-25, excerpt):
This works for me:
What your screenshot shows is the deletion of the row containing id,
name, and description from the table styles. This is exactly what
I've written in my first mail.
Using a GUI tool to do what you can do in `sqli
That damn right mouse click :) I always use it to see if there are more
options, but not this time.
Thanks Jean-Luc! This makes it much easier.
Jack
Op 24-09-18 om 22:30 schreef Jean-Luc CECCOLI:
Message du 24/09/18 13:58
De : "kneops"
A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.o
Didn't think of that ;) using the terminal. Thanks.
I did enable hidden files in my file manager (Linux Mint), but that did
not result in seeing these folders in the Sqlite browser. And in the
browser UI I could not find an option to show hidden files.
Op 24-09-18 om 13:52 schreef Patrick S
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
