Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

+1 (non binding, occasional user) David Jencks > On Feb 27, 2024, at 11:30 PM, Benjamin Marwell wrote: > > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Ja

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

From your first paragraph I’d guess you would be on the “maven built on a recent LTS java” side. I was wondering, given these omnipresent IDES, and possibly from a philosophical perspective, what the arguments for “maven built on an antique JVM” would be. Thanks David Jencks > On Feb

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

packaging questions (IIUC there’s no way for the maven project to ship a java implementation), why should Maven be different? Thanks David Jencks > On Feb 20, 2024, at 1:30 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > Romain, > > you immediately revealed your WHY: > Take off your "paid d

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

I wonder if having maven require java 8 syntax discourages any potential contributors who are used to coding using more recent developments. I have no idea how to tell, but maybe someone else does. David Jencks > On Jun 1, 2023, at 3:02 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Speed up release process?

ks to effective development are or what other solutions might be possible. In particular, I’d like to see an analysis of what would happen if a “release” was for a particular project plus all downstream changes needed to use it, whether as a single vote or as concurrent votes. Thanks David Jenc

Re: [DISCUSS] Speed up release process?

If all 153 projects released at once with 72 hour windows, that would be 72 hours. That’s just as plausible as sequential releases. David Jencks > On Nov 18, 2022, at 11:54 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > As I wrote, we did have examples of changes + cascading, it is okay. > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Speed up release process?

mal releases. David Jencks > On Nov 18, 2022, at 11:54 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > As I wrote, we did have examples of changes + cascading, it is okay. > > But I don't agree with your statement about the board, as they themselves > state "should" not "mu

Re: [DISCUSS] Speed up release process?

Lets try one question/issue per email… Which developers have to pause what activities. David Jencks > On Nov 18, 2022, at 11:54 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > As I wrote, we did have examples of changes + cascading, it is okay. > > But I don't agree with your statement

Re: [DISCUSS] Speed up release process?

n’t with me. How many of these annoyances would be eliminated by an easy way to release and vote on a set of changed artifacts + the cascading dependencies all at once? thanks David Jencks > On Nov 18, 2022, at 11:17 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > David, > > I just meant that

Re: [DISCUSS] Speed up release process?

ho is forced to do anything and for what reason? AFAIK cascading dependencies can be handled by releasing cause + all effects at once. If that’s hard to do now, maybe there’s a way to make it easier. I’d expect it would make testing a change more plausible as well. David Jencks > On Nov 18, 2022

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatically format and sort imports

ways of running the build that skipped the format check. David Jencks > On Oct 13, 2022, at 8:31 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > Le jeu. 13 oct. 2022 à 17:13, Łukasz Dywicki <mailto:l...@code-house.org>> a écrit : > >> Some of findings I have: >> >&g

Re: APT vs Markdown formats for site docs

. David Jencks > On Feb 1, 2021, at 7:24 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Log4j didn’t switch everything. A couple pages had to be left as Markdown for > things AsciiDoc doesn’t support, although at the moment I don’t remember what > those things were at the moment. > > Ralph

Re: APT vs Markdown formats for site docs

I’m now the primary maintainer of jekyll-asciidoc so issues may receive prompt attention. I think Antora is incomparable, and would certainly produce fabulous results properly used for maven documentation, but with the investment in Doxia organization that may be a better choice. David Jencks

Re: How does maven-site publishing work?

I’m also strongly in favor of using asciidoc rather than markdown and using Antora, however that’s a separate issue. Completely off topic for this thread, but…. how hard would it be for the maven site plugin to generate asciidoc? David Jencks > On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:38 AM, Michael Osipov wr

Re: Merging via GitHub

=fuller By default git log just shows the author, and you are looking for the committer (person who merged in the commit). See git-log <https://git-scm.com/docs/git-log#_pretty_formats> david jencks > On May 16, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > I wonder what is exac

Re: Merging via GitHub

It's possible to configure GitHub to allow rebase and merge, which I think is what you want. It may be possible to configure GitHub to only allow this. I’m not sure if this is something infra has to do or if a project admin can set it up. Camel recently made a related change. David J

Re: Update versions of all plugins in default-bindings.xml

:...” If someone is maintaining plug-in versions manually is there a tool to point out all the upgrade possibilities? Thanks David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 12, 2019, at 7:39 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > we have 2 opposite objectives: > - make default near-empty pom

Re: Formal verification of thread correctness in maven core

nd of before/after logic (this is designed for osgi weaving hooks). With this approach you would not need subclasses. david jencks On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote: > What kind of changes to the model do you expect? Can you give some > pointers that explain verificatio

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B david jencks On Dec 15, 2014, at 5:39 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an >

Re: Ticket Transition Workflow: Abandoned issues

In my work life use of RTC Backlog means "needs to be investigated by a developer". I think Cancelled as Incomplete might be a closer RTC match to the meaning we are looking for here. david jencks On Nov 26, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Chris Graham wrote: > RTC uses Backlog. Does Jira h

Re: Ticket Transition Workflow: Abandoned issues

Retired rather than Archived? This cleanup seems like a really good idea :-) david jencks On Nov 26, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > My 2-cents on the word "Archived" is that it's a synonym for > Backup/Storage, which I don't think is what this proces

Re: [jira] (SCM-775) Request for new optional parameter RTC (workItem) with release:prepare to associate workitem with changesets got created during build process

stuff like this, but I have no idea how. david jencks On Sep 10, 2014, at 8:51 AM, "AShit Shah (JIRA)" wrote: > >[ > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=352607#comment-35260

Re: RFP: Version Range Policy

with and whether they correspond in any way with what the project developers think the versions are? thanks david jencks On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: > I am more optimistic then you. here is the idea > https://github.com/barchart/barchart-version-tester/wiki

Re: RFP: Version Range Policy

time soon. thanks david jencks On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: >*Maven Developers* > >1) This is a formal request to resolve long standing version range >policy problem in maven, >expressed for example in the following ticket: >http://

Re: the simplest possible maven plugin, sort of

with the release-version code to get the plugin available in the local maven repo before running the actual release. If I'm wrong for any version of maven I'd love to know how :-) thanks david jencks On Sep 10, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Interesting… I wonder how

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

> C) I'm all over the place. I do global updates to dependencies and > reformat code like there's no tomorrow. > > I think these are the three models we need to support well. I think > especially A is important, since it's the > gateway to entry ;) I like this division.

Re: improving incremental builds

Is what you want different from what mvn -amd moduleA does? So your idea is to find the list of changed modules and then build that list with -amd? thanks david jencks On Aug 25, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > After a short discussion with Kristian, I

Re: Meta information about dependencies in a pom?

associated with dependencies, and all other uses should just duplicate large swathes of maven configuration to be able to add a couple bits of info per dependency. My impression is that aether takes a more inclusive view of dependency properties. thanks david jencks On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:00

Re: [VOTE] Usage of Aether and Sisu as dependencies of maven core with EPL licenses - take 2

Another month went by any progress? david jencks On Sep 30, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > To clarify... I last checked yesterday, and the PMC in question is some > eclipse PMC but it is unclear to me, only having just got my eclipse account > set up, exactly which &

Re: Maven release plugin not honoring -Darguments

IIRC you have to include your forked maven arguments in the release plugin configuration under -DskipTests=true -DfailIfNoTests=false Perhaps someone else can say _why_ the m-r-p is set up so you can't set this on the command line? thanks david jencks On Sep 27, 2011, at 5:40 AM,

Re: are multi-threaded builds still working reliably?

Maybe it would be a good idea to mention this on the siki page? Anyone know why? I thought maven used the eclipse compiler which is IIUC just java code so why would it behave differently on different os? thanks david jencks On Sep 24, 2011, at 12:11 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > On osx you m

are multi-threaded builds still working reliably?

rsion "1.6.0_26" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-384-10M3425) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02-384, mixed mode) thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.

Re: [DISCUSS] incorporate EPL Aether

re I understand the thinking behind the idea that sonatype will make aether unusable for maven (isn't this the basic concern over using aether?). I don't see this as a plausible scenario. thanks david jencks On Jul 30, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > The board made it prett

Possible feature request about scary warnings

is already possible but there's no way to find out about it? thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [maven-assembly-plugin] smart(er) dependency merge

I think the shade plugin does something like this. david jencks On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:45 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > (If support for this use case already exists then apologies in advance > but I suspect it's not supported and that I'll need to hack some extra > cod

Re: Article proposed for Maven Article Page

nd very quickly your intended separation has disappeared. I'm now willing to put up with a really lot of build system annoyance to get it to enforce this kind of separation. hope I haven't made this thread too long... thanks david jencks On Apr 20, 2011, at 2:45 AM, xanadu72 wrote: >

Re: really threadsafe?

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRRESOURCES-54 thank you so much for looking into this the parallel build is great! thanks david jencks On Mar 27, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > I was sent the url to the old velocity stuff and I see several thread safety > issues

really threadsafe?

t be able to spend a little time given enough advice. thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: How do you get aether to traverse the entire dependency tree?

This ended up being good advice. The problem was an antique maven-install-plugin specified in a parent pom. Is there some way to require minimum plugin versions in a custom packaging or its LifecycleMapping? thanks david jencks On Mar 21, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote

How do you get aether to traverse the entire dependency tree?

.geronimo.transaction.kar: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.geronimo.features:org.apache.geronimo.transaction.kar:kar:3.99.99-SNAPSHOT: Could not find artifact org.apache.geronimo.features:org.apache.geronimo.jaxb-support:feature:features:3.99.99-SNAPSHOT in nexus (http://localhost:8081/nexu

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

NAPSHOT to .SNAPSHOT when generating the bundle's own osgi version. david jencks On Dec 10, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > as part of MNG-4893 [0] an inconsistency in the way a version string is > treated as a snapshot or release was detected. In short, the is

Re: Auto apache version standard as an enforcer rule?

rement based on that. might be useful... david jencks On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 11/08/2010 02:21 AM, Rex Hoffman wrote: >> project: java-version-delta > > By the way, you should look at https://sigtest.dev.java.net/ if you have not > done so already. I&#

Re: Dependency policies

maybe you could enhance that rule to do regexp matching on each maven coordinate component and implement your category concept using a naming convention? david jencks On Oct 1, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > It's close but not exactly what I need. I don't want to m

maven-remote-resources-plugin ignores offline?

oblem? So far I haven't located any of the code that might be responsible for this. thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Incompatibilities between maven 2.2.1 and 3.0.0-beta-1

for me I would like to know how to work around (1). thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Surefire and non-jar artifacts

hat do people think? So are you proposing that if you have a rar, war, or ear, including it as a dependency will figure out all the jars inside, compute the actual internal classpath, and add all these to the maven classpath? I have not problem with this but it's unclear to me if that'

Re: [Result] [VOTE] Apache (parent POM) version 7

Any idea when another try might be feasible? I'm updating a bunch of project's builds, having the completely built-in source assembly would be pretty handy. many thanks david jencks On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:40 PM, John Casey wrote: I've withdrawn the tag for this vote. We can

Re: [VOTE] Apache (parent POM) version 7

the vote thread might be good too :-) thanks david jencks On Nov 14, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Benjamin Bentmann wrote: John Casey wrote: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-001/org/apache/apache/7/ +1 I change my vote -1 after discovering that

Re: Release plugin documentation request

usage page or better yet included in the goal explanation pages? thanks david jencks On Dec 6, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi David Great to get some feedback on the docs. I think we have "prepare", "perform" and "branch" covered prett

Does maven provide any support for re-signing artifacts with longer keys?

older artifacts with a new longer key? If not, does anyone have any advice for a non-maven way to do it? thanks david jencks

Re: Release plugin documentation request

but they are in my experience very hard to find and I don't think this is applicable to anything but release:prepare. I'd also like to request that the meaning of release:clean be explained what exactly is changed? thanks david jencks On Nov 28, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Stevo Sl

Does gpg plugin work properly with gpg 2.0.12, the use of which is specified by apache?

the gpg agent as well. Running a release I see a message at every signing opportunity gpg: WARNING: "--no-use-agent" is an obsolete option - it has no effect You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "David Jencks (CODE SIGNING KEY) " 4096-bit RSA key, ID A2F9E

Release plugin documentation request

some accurate info along these lines and I doubt I would be the only one appreciating the effort. thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Follow up on creating ASF-compliant source releases

that svn needs LICENSE and NOTICE files at expected checkout roots that cover what is actually in svn, as opposed to what gets in the binary, javadoc, or source jars. So these would get added to the source release packaging. thanks david jencks Also, the "project" descriptor w

Re: Incorrect license metadata after inheriting org.apache:apache:6

figured out how to not include the DEPENDENCIES file but I don't know what they did. thanks david jencks On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:13 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, In Jackrabbit we recently upgraded to the org.apache:apache:6 parent POM to get the latest repository.apache.org settings, but as a

Re: Update on ASF Release requirements

On Jun 11, 2009, at 9:56 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Brian Fox wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote: Update: The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to be working

Re: Update on ASF Release requirements

On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Brian Fox wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote: Update: The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to be working great. I have just one thing to resolve that I had

Re: Update on ASF Release requirements

eed to add them. thanks david jencks I need to understand better the default resource bundle processing and how to pull the right pieces together into the assembly. Otherwise we are pretty close to getting all this staged and released. --Brian On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Brian Fox wrote: Just to b

Re: PluginManagement in ASF pom

poms. For these in particular they are both AFAICT superseded by the built in idea tooling and m2eclipse. thanks david jencks On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Brian Fox wrote: On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi folks, I just spot the r766947 [1] of the ASF pom w

Is site plugin 2.0 usable for multi-module projects?

project using the site plugin 2.0 on os x? A working example would be great. thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.7

On Jun 3, 2009, at 4:36 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:54 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Jun 3, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: To be conform with ASF requirements, I understand that we have to wait the new assembly plugin to be able to produce the new sources

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.7

aven/resources/trunk/apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor/src/main/resources/assemblies/source-release.xml david jencks I have no problem, myself, to wait the release of the plugin some more days (I maintain it but I don't use it for myself ;-) ). But I don't think it&#x

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.7

runs once. Now that the policy has been clarified there are no more excuses to not following it. thanks david jencks On Jun 3, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: I think there's no value to block all releases, waiting for this fix.I agree, support this change, but it won'

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

instead of "jar"? Changing the phase works great!! thanks david jencks David Jencks wrote: I guess my description wasn't quite precise enough to get people to look at the snippet. The snippet I showed has this bit twice: [INFO] [assembly:single {execution: default}] [I

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

should block the release. thanks david jencks On Jun 1, 2009, at 11:01 AM, John Casey wrote: If you're talking about the [source:jar] bit, then that's another plugin (maven-sources-plugin, IIRC) that may need to be turned off...though that does produce a different type of artifact

Re: [VOTE 3] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

Assuming it's not a configuration problem, at this point I'd rather have a release than wait more days to fix this but if its an easy fix it would be great to only assemble once. thanks david jencks On May 29, 2009, at 4:41 PM, John Casey wrote: Hi again, I've cor

Re: [VOTE 2] maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4

you're being a lot of the time you'll get it wrong. BTW, how/when will the almost as important assembly descriptor get released? thanks david jencks On May 28, 2009, at 3:23 PM, John Casey wrote: Hi, I've corrected the regression from the first VOTE thread for this plugi

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 13, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 13, 2009, at 10:41 AM, David Jencks wrote: Sorry I wasn't more specific last night at 2:00 am :-). I need more scm context to understand. I'm assuming something like svn with +tags +root-1.0 (1.0) +A(1.0) \B(1.0)

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 13, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 13, 2009, at 12:53 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'm even more mystified and understand how you want to use scm even less. One of the basic principles I have for scm is that stuff shouldn't be duplicated, in the sense th

Re: Progress on support for large projects

On May 12, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 12, 2009, at 6:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: On May 12, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 12, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Brian Fox wrote: As I already said, I talked about release-plugin and my view of the world and it seems

Re: Progress on support for large projects

ersions I wanted the layout became much easier for me to understand. Does this correspond at all to what you guys are talking about? thanks david jencks Ralph - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

Re: Update on ASF Release requirements

Could I ask what's going to happen after you get the assembly plugin improved? Will there be an apache 7 pom or, how else would we get this new functionality? thanks david jencks On May 7, 2009, at 8:13 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: I just need to finish the ITs. --Brian (mobile) On

Re: Archetype capabilities/limitations?

On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 6-Apr-09, at 9:13 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Apr 4, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 4-Apr-09, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'd like to write something I'll call it an archetype for now that generat

Re: Archetype capabilities/limitations?

On Apr 4, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 4-Apr-09, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'd like to write something I'll call it an archetype for now that generates a maven project but needs to run a _lot_ of java code in order to figure out what to put in the n

Archetype capabilities/limitations?

stuff? I'd also like it push dependencyManagement stuff and possibly some properties into parent poms and check that it's not duplicating stuff. Is there already code in the archetype plugin stuff that does this or would I be adding a new

Re: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering without using a normal module dependency?

o explicitly list them as dependencies then the plugin ought to get a chance to add dependencies during some kind of setup phase. I have a plugin for which this would be extremely handy. Is this what is planned for 3.0 or is there another point of view I have yet to comprehend? thank

Re: Is it now possible to affect reactor build ordering without using a normal module dependency?

of p1 or p2 on p3 or p4. AFAICT the current behavior is that maven puts p1...p4 in a single bucket and tries to find a build order that satisfies the dependencies. thanks david jencks On Apr 3, 2009, at 9:11 AM, James Carpenter wrote: In the past plugins such as the dependency plugin

Re: Current status of moving apache projects to apache's nexus instance?

no awareness of the consequences about where their deployments will end up and whether or not any other steps need to be taken for other portals project release destinations. thanks david jencks On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:48 PM, David Jencks wrote: I'm trying to help the apache portals project set u

Current status of moving apache projects to apache's nexus instance?

likely to work... https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/portals-pom/trunk/pom.xml https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/applications/applications-pom/trunk/pom.xml thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: element in plugin POMs

duce plugin's scm location from the parents. I thought leaving out the scm tag only works when the entire set of maven projects was released at once with a fixed relationship between parent and sub-projects. Am I missing something? thanks david jencks On Aug 11, 2008, at 11:51 A

Re: artifact retrieval, mercury, and jetty-client

side it. This might not be the ideal list to discuss this in more detail :-) thanks david jencks from my perspective what we need to wire up in mercury right now is some generic security api that something like maven can inject with the goop in setting.xml meshed with repositories tags so it can s

Re: artifact retrieval, mercury, and jetty-client

lient side authentication has the same kinds of problems as the server side authentication but I suspect that we can work something out that is both efficient and spec compatible. thanks david jencks Anyway, I am interested in hearing how folks want to address this in mercury so any thought

Re: artifact signing feature branches

inked) Are the sample settings in the repo sig policy section backwards? ignore warn david jencks I've created a couple of branches to try integrating the work again in as simple and non-intrusive manner (both in code and to the user) as possible. I al

Re: [Proposal] Pom Code Style (WAS svn commit: r670264 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/pom.xml)

order of dependencies in the top level pom to decide which version to use, and have the easy ability to sort the dependencies. I've seen too many projects with duplicate dependencies because there are a hundred or so in random order. thanks david jencks -Original Message-

Re: xbean in 2.1 break embeddabable usage of maven

I wonder if having xbean add an editor if there is nothing there for a class already would work. thanks david jencks On May 29, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: Well, the PropertyEditors class in xbean sets every imaginable property editor to

Re: namespace support in POM.xml ?

x27;t see any major differences between the relaxng approach and the xml schema approach beyond the differences between relaxng and xmlschema. On the other hand this is the first time I've seen relaxng. Are there any tools like jaxb that work with relaxng? thanks david jencks On Ma

Re: Where should release plugin copy from?

y/pom.xml Wed Mar 12 00:26:14 2008 @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ org.apache.geronimo.plugins directory-parent -1.0 +1.0.1-SNAPSHOT ../pom.xml . which looks to me like the release plugin is following the process

Where should release plugin copy from?

revert if the new version is the same as the old version 4. commit the working copy poms if there is a new version. Is this process svn specific? If so could it be provided as an option? thanks david jencks - To unsubscribe

Re: [regression] Cannot release plugins parent!

modules element would be appropriate? thanks david jencks Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [regression] Cannot release plugins parent!

For a situation like this where a "parent" is also being used sometimes for building all the "children" although that is not its primary purpose, how about putting the modules in a profile that e.g. hudson can use? thanks david jencks On Apr 12, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Brian

Re: Generated NOTICE files.... a solution

27;t work when I did it :-) - I can't configure projectName in a suitable place so it shows up in the generated NOTICE. In the configuration for the remote-resources plugin, add something like: Apache CXF Aha! that works too many thanks david jencks Dan On Thursday 13

Generated NOTICE files.... a solution

a suitable place so it shows up in the generated NOTICE. Despite these problems I think this proposal is clearly more in line with apache policy and hope it can be accepted and released quickly. Many thanks david jencks -

Re: Legal files and maven automation

le to this scheme of generating the LICENSE and NOTICE files so I'll go ahead and propose that maven adopt this as the standard recommended maven-remote- resources-plugin bundle for apache projects. thanks david jencks On Mar 11, 2008, at 6:27 AM, sebb wrote: On 10/03/2008, Erik Abele <[

Re: Legal files and maven automation

but I think trying to second guess them in this informational report is not practical. thanks david jencks ... From: 'The Apache Software Foundation' (http://jakarta.apache.org) And here it's fine :-) Cheers, Erik

Re: Legal files and maven automation

On Mar 10, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:44 AM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's what it does: By default, the LICENSE file is the standard apache license. The NOTICE file is generated from a velocity template; here'

Legal files and maven automation

m the contents and come up with something, that is out of scope of this proposal. I expect anyone building such an assembly will examine the contents and construct by hand suitable files to append to the standard LICENSE and NOTICE files. ------ Objections? Comments? many thanks david jencks

Re: maven-ear-plugin and dependencies

an ear which you can even name whatever you want. This at least gets ears to the level of dysfunction of wars. thanks david jencks The only mention I can find about the classpath entry is a FAQ entry at http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ejb-plugin/faq.html, but this rather cryptic exp

Re: maven-ear-plugin and dependencies

t added to the classpath. We could work on jee5 support, that ought to keep everyone happy. Does the defaultJarBundleDir do this? I guess if so it might need to be put in the generated application.xml?? As you can tell I haven't looked at what the plugin actually does now. thanks

Re: XMLBeans Plugin Release

;d hate to see what you come up with for a pom for it based on the one for 2.0.0. I'd suggest delaying that until xmlbeans approves a set of poms for the 2.2.0 jars. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MXMLBEANS-2 appears to be partially fixed (?) but is not a problem for apache projects.

Re: MNG-2571 - weird exception using the embedder

en.plugin.ear.EarModule] So what am I missing? How come that 'isInstance' method from the Class object could return different results? The classes are in different classloaders. Hopefully the classloaders' toString() will give you enough info about which ones they are if you a

  1   2   >