[dev] Re : Buid sdk CppComponent with Cygwin

2009-06-15 Thread Christophe Devalland
2009/6/15 Juergen Schmidt > The SDK comes with it's own mini build env that i never have tried with > cygwin. > > In general i would say it will work with some minor changes in the > configuration to differentiate between a windows shell or 4nt shell and a > cygwin shell that is more unix like. I

[dev] Re: Interested in helping with development

2009-07-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Terrence Miller sbcglobal.net> writes: > To avoid going crazy with nothing to do I would like to become involved > with Open Office. Low level C++ issues such as exception handling is > the area I know the most about. I have access to systems running > Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux. Hi Terence, We

Re: [dev] Re: oopm: current project status

2009-07-20 Thread Elizabeth Matthis
Hi Carsten, I think it is great that you are trying to move the OOPM project ahead. Just to get teh whole picture, I read the wiki page on which it says: . Right now the work on the requirements specification for a prototype has started (issue 57601

[dev] Re: Building CWS odff06 with debug

2009-07-27 Thread Michael Stahl
Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Regina, > > On Sunday, 2009-07-26 21:15:15 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: >> dbgoutsw.cxx >> c:/odff06debug/solver/300/wntmsci12.pro/bin/makedepend >> @C:/cygwin/tmp/mkosWuQI > ../../../wntmsci12.pro/misc/s_drviewsa.dpcc >> c:/odff06debug/sw/source/core/doc/dbgoutsw.cxx(998)

[dev] Re: Building CWS odff06 with debug

2009-07-28 Thread Michael Stahl
Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > I have added SW_DLLPUBLIC in dbgoutsw.hxx. > > Then I have build it with --enable-dbgutil and left out --enable-debug > as Eike told me. That build finished. I installed it and started it. > > Next step I did (analog to Eike's mail) > cd sw > build killobj >

[dev] Re: Duplicated header contents in svx

2009-08-08 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Kohei Yoshida novell.com> writes: > The bad news is that this file is not the only file with duplicated > content. In the same directory, I've found several other headers with > the same duplication problem. AccessibleStaticTextBase.hxx and > acorrcfg.hxx are also affected, quite possibly other

[dev] Re: Duplicated header contents in svx

2009-08-08 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Christian Lohmaier openoffice.org> writes: > No, not true. > it was added with os128 Oh, ups - Im too dump to use opengroks history differ. > True, but of course for the correct cws. Ok, I will have a look next week (as os is on vacation). I will try to have a look too at the cws commits to see w

Re: [dev] Re: libxml2 dependency on zlib

2009-08-12 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/10/09 18:11, Michael Stahl wrote: just noticed that libxmlsec/xmlsec1-1.2.6.patch contains its own hacked up version of the xml2-config script. sometime last year i've changed the libxml2 module so it delivers its own xml2-config into the solver (surprisingly, that was not done before), and

[dev] Re: Important Process for Mercurial Users

2009-08-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Jens-Heiner Rechtien Sun.COM> writes: > I'll keep that in mind. Some great suggestions here, I'll have a look at > them! Well, if we have postcommit hooks on the outgoing repositories wouldnt it be even simpler to just check the milestone that is set in the source code (in solenv/inc/minor.mk)

[dev] Re: Problems building DEV300_m54 on Ubuntu

2009-09-10 Thread Michael Stahl
Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Kristján, > > On Sunday, 2009-09-06 20:49:27 +, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: > >> I am having problems building DEV300_m54 on Ubuntu, I am using the prepared >> Ubuntu build image, but with a newer source. >> >> I get the following error: >> /home/ooo/Desktop/DEV

[dev] Re: Problems building DEV300_m54 on Ubuntu

2009-09-11 Thread Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson
> > - - - - - - - - - Áframsendur póstur - - - - - - - - - - > From: Michael Stahl > To: dev@openoffice.org > Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:16:43 +0200 > Subject: Re: Problems building DEV300_m54 on Ubuntu > Eike Rathke wrote: > > Hi Kristján, > > > > On Sunday, 2009-09-06 20:49:27 +, Kristján Bja

[dev] Re: [dev-educ] [ClassRoom] mercurial ClassRoom

2009-11-11 Thread eric.bachard
OOops, I forgot the hour :) The ClassRoom will start around CET 17:00 ( Paris, Hamburg ) For further information, see : http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_ClassRoom/Agenda Thanks, Eric Bachard -- Education Project: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project

[dev] Re: Modifying OOo source: beginners help

2010-01-08 Thread Michael Stahl
On 08/01/2010 14:39, Richard Whitehead wrote: > Hello, > > Please can someone help with the basics of adding some code to the OOo > source. > > I am using a third-party static library that I want to call from the > existing code. I added my new source code (to an existing OOo source file > at

[dev] Re: license question: np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c

2010-01-28 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, Anyone have a chance to look at these question? yours, Julius On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Julius Davies wrote: > Hi, > > The [np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c] source file appears to be licensed under > MPL-1.1.  It's not tri-licensed under the usual GPL/LGPL/MPL > combination most files are.

[dev] Re: dmake error: while building ucbhelper

2010-02-01 Thread Michael Stahl
On 01/02/2010 10:19, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 02/01/10 09:23, Toufique, Imam wrote: >> Yes, it does. At the beginning I thought -fPIC was not being pulled in, so, >> I set it manually for g++. > > Hm, sorry, leaves me clueless. > > -Stephan me too. the only explanation that comes to mind

[dev] Re: [discuss] Open Office development issue

2010-03-10 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Hi Kapil, first of all please use the appropriate mailing list. In your case it is d...@api.openoffice.org or d...@extensions.openoffice.org and please ensure that you are subscribed correctly. It doesn't make sense to post on n different mailing lists. Please don't do that!!! Now related

Re: [dev] Re: mysterious headers */inc/segdefs.hxx

2010-03-10 Thread David Tardon
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:44:07PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 10/03/2010 13:58, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:51 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> does anyone know what's the purpose of the various inc/segdefs.hxx and > >> inc/segdefs_.hxx headers? They do

Re: [dev] Re: mysterious headers */inc/segdefs.hxx

2010-03-10 Thread Niklas Nebel
On 03/10/10 19:39, David Tardon wrote: Ha, I wondered why these headers weren't present in the sw module too :) I'll create an issue and remove the remaining ones too, then. It's happening already: http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/dr73/rev/f0ff1950d291, http://hg.services.openoffice.org/

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-11 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Michael, On Wednesday, 2010-03-10 15:35:44 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > hmm... and what about this crapfest: > /tools/inc/tools/solar.h > > uhm... typedef int FASTBOOL ? seriously? Yes. With Win16 on 486 processors or some such ... passing an int was faster than a char (BOOL) and C++ bool

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-11 Thread Herbert Duerr
On Mar 11, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: On Wednesday, 2010-03-10 15:35:44 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: hmm... and what about this crapfest: /tools/inc/tools/solar.h uhm... typedef int FASTBOOL ? seriously? Yes. With Win16 on 486 processors or some such ... passing an int was faster t

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Herbert Duerr wrote: > And while you are at it also replace the countless methods that > still use sal_uInt16 instead of int as return value... goodbye > Win3.1! ;-) > Replace those methods with what? ;) -- Thorsten pgpq2wmSShlac.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-11 Thread Herbert Duerr
And while you are at it also replace the countless methods that still use sal_uInt16 instead of int as return value... goodbye Win3.1! ;-) Replace those methods with what? ;) With their int equivalents. E.g. svx/inc/svx/svdpage.hxx: sal_uInt16 GetPageNum() const; could be replaced by sv

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-11 Thread bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:10:55 +0100 Herbert Duerr wrote: > >> And while you are at it also replace the countless methods that > >> still use sal_uInt16 instead of int as return value... goodbye > >> Win3.1! ;-) > >> > > Replace those methods with what? ;) > > With their int equivalents. E.g. >

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-11 Thread Herbert Duerr
And while you are at it also replace the countless methods that still use sal_uInt16 instead of int as return value... goodbye Win3.1! ;-) Replace those methods with what? ;) With their int equivalents. E.g. svx/inc/svx/svdpage.hxx: sal_uInt16 GetPageNum() const; could be replaced by sv

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-11 Thread bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:26:12 +0100 Herbert Duerr wrote: > That was my point. The rule that got us the hardcoded WIN16-style > code then is not IMHO is not a good guide for the future. If the > timeless native types had been used it would have grown with the > platform. And thus would be ABI inco

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-12 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Herbert Duerr wrote: > With their int equivalents. E.g. >svx/inc/svx/svdpage.hxx: sal_uInt16 GetPageNum() const; > could be replaced by >svx/inc/svx/svdpage.hxx: int GetPageNum() const; > > And there are a gazillion other methods that can be found using grep > "sal_.*Int16" */inc/ > Of c

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-12 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Michael, On Thursday, 2010-03-11 18:16:03 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > imho, fixed size types are mandatory only on I/O paths: network protocols, > file formats, and such. Btw, as long as we include that *gasp* binfilter module we'll have to deal with our own legacy and conversions or casts

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-12 Thread Herbert Duerr
Hi Thorsten, please see my answers below. I don't think the fixed-width types are a hot topic that should get that much attention. Sounding the alarm on the use of native types is not attention-worthy either. Especially since the same reasoning got us worse code then, extra maintenance bu

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-12 Thread Philipp Lohmann
On 3/12/10 2:50 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: your suggestion shows the fundamental flaw I've pointed out earlier - that too much of the code makes implicit assumptions about the available int ranges. Just grep for 0x, 0xFFFE etc. and weep. The hardcoded range-checks were probably good enough th

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-12 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Philipp Lohmann wrote: > On 3/12/10 2:50 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > >>your suggestion shows the fundamental flaw I've pointed out earlier > >>- that too much of the code makes implicit assumptions about the > >>available int ranges. Just grep for 0x, 0xFFFE etc. and weep. > > > >The hardcoded r

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-15 Thread Herbert Duerr
Hi, much of what Herbert writes is beside my point I think that criticizing old rules that cause problems today by causing bigger, slower, limited code which introduces extra maintenance burdens and extra bugs from too tight types and signed-/ unsigned issues is right on topic. Is this no

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Herbert Duerr wrote: > I think that criticizing old rules that cause problems today by > causing bigger, slower, limited code which introduces extra > maintenance burdens and extra bugs from too tight types and signed-/ > unsigned issues is right on topic. Is this not the topic we are > talking abo

Re: [dev] Re: Coding St{andards|yle}

2010-03-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
I wrote: > [...] iff the native ints are desirable [...] then let's make sure > that first off this dearly missed "what every computer scientist > should know about integer math" page is written. ;) > That's of course nonsense. This page needs to be written unconditionally. :) -- Thorsten pgpk

[dev] Re: problem with compiling ooo-build

2010-03-26 Thread Björn Michaelsen
Am Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:31:28 +0100 schrieb Michal Spisiak : > Hi, > could you please help me with the following problem? After successful > downloading and configuring I typed make and got some problem with > patch: Hi Michal, please use the official build instructions at: http://wiki.services.o

[dev] Re: Problems building OOO320_m14 on Windows.

2010-03-30 Thread Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson
Ok I see the problem now, it seems that the makefile.rc was messed up when changing copyright notice and invalid remarks where created: http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO320/diff/659920c8492d/makefile.rc This means that the current OOO320_m14 release can't be built directly from source without

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-30 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi all, Andreas Bartel wrote (30-03-10 00:48) Thorsten Behrens wrote: With some interest I've read all the contributions in this discussion. I've been learning a lot about differences and interference of product and project etc. etc. I support Martins idea, that he likes to see a broad repr

[dev] Re: [ux-discuss] OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-30 Thread André Schnabel
Hi Andreas, * first a disclaimer: my comments represent only my own views about the project - I'm not speaking for anybody else (esp. not for Torsten) Addition to the disclaimer: I have been a long-term contributor to the project but have never really contributed code (ok a ~10 LOC patch).

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Juergen Schmidt
On 3/31/10 12:43 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: Hi all, Andreas Bartel wrote (30-03-10 00:48) Thorsten Behrens wrote: With some interest I've read all the contributions in this discussion. I've been learning a lot about differences and interference of product and project etc. etc. I support Martins id

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:36:16AM +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the CC > was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger OpenOffice.org > community and against derivated work. And in consequence of this i see a

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi all, Rene Engelhard wrote (31-03-10 12:52) On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:36:16AM +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the CC was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger OpenOffice.org community and against derivated work.

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:18 +0200 Rene Engelhard wrote: > a stronger community means actively involving hughe parts of the > "community". which you don't. there's still many sun-internal decision > just posed to the "community" as a fact everyxone has to live with. Who is "you" here? Sun contrib

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:32:56PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: >>> mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the >>> CC was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger >>> OpenOffice.org community and against derivated work. And in >>> consequence of this i see

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:30:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:18 +0200 > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > a stronger community means actively involving hughe parts of the > > "community". which you don't. there's still many su

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:30:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:18 +0200 > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > a stronger community means actively involving hughe parts of the > > "community". which you don't. there's still many sun-int

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi *, Rene Engelhard wrote (31-03-10 13:37) On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:32:56PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the CC was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger OpenOffice.org community and against derivated work. And in

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:52:11 +0200 Rene Engelhard wrote: > How is patch -pX lack of resources? How is telling people how they > need to change stuff to get a patch (which works for everyone else > except Sun and is needed there) finalized to get integrated a resource > problem? (The fix I have in

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:25:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:52:11 +0200 > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > How is patch -pX lack of resources? How is telling people how they > > need to change stuff to get a patch (which works

Re: [dev] Re: Finding code for SvNumberFormatter

2010-04-19 Thread Niklas Nebel
On 04/17/10 17:36, Matt Needles wrote: Thanks, Niklas. I see from these sources where to add the new format code, but I can't find where the actual rendering of the formats is done. That is, where is the code that creates the output string in the specified format? Can you help please? SvNumberF

Re: [dev] Re: Finding code for SvNumberFormatter

2010-04-19 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Matt, On Saturday, 2010-04-17 11:36:16 -0400, Matt Needles wrote: > Thanks, Niklas. I see from these sources where to add the new format > code, but I can't find where the actual rendering of the formats is > done. That is, where is the code that creates the output string in the > specified fo

Re: [dev] Re: [releases] recommended stlport settings?

2010-04-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the > STLport-requirement > (and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms). If we continue to build and package into the install sets stlport on Linux x86, but not actually

Re: [dev] Re: [releases] recommended stlport settings?

2010-04-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:43:28AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the > > STLport-requirement > > (and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms). (Note that I didn't

Re: [dev] Re: [releases] recommended stlport settings?

2010-05-10 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 04/26/10 10:43, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the STLport-requirement (and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms). If we continue to build and package into the install sets

Re: [dev] Re: [releases] recommended stlport settings?

2010-05-12 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 05/10/10 09:59, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 04/26/10 10:43, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the STLport-requirement (and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms). If we continu

[dev] Re: [ux-discuss] i47600 - action needed

2010-05-20 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Camille Moulin wrote: > //UNUSED2009-05 void ScDocument::SetPrintRange( SCTAB nTab, const > ScRange& rNew ) > //UNUSED2009-05 { > //UNUSED2009-05 if (ValidTab(nTab) && pTab[nTab]) > //UNUSED2009-05 pTab[nTab]->SetPrintRange( rNew ); > //UNUSED2009-05 } > Ugh. Why are we still doing _th

[dev] Re: [ux-discuss] i47600 - action needed

2010-05-20 Thread Niklas Nebel
On 05/20/10 10:08, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Camille Moulin wrote: //UNUSED2009-05 void ScDocument::SetPrintRange( SCTAB nTab, const ScRange& rNew ) //UNUSED2009-05 { //UNUSED2009-05 if (ValidTab(nTab) && pTab[nTab]) //UNUSED2009-05 pTab[nTab]->SetPrintRange( rNew ); //UNUSED2009-05 }

[dev] Re: [ux-discuss] i47600 - action needed

2010-05-20 Thread camille . moulin
- "Thorsten Behrens" a écrit : > Camille Moulin wrote: > > //UNUSED2009-05 void ScDocument::SetPrintRange( SCTAB nTab, const > > ScRange& rNew ) > > //UNUSED2009-05 { > > //UNUSED2009-05 if (ValidTab(nTab) && pTab[nTab]) > > //UNUSED2009-05 pTab[nTab]->SetPrintRange( rNew ); > >

[dev] Re: Open Office on Publishing Site

2005-01-17 Thread Andrew Ziem
integrative ink wrote: I am the owner and senior editor of Integrative Ink, an Editing & Publishing services company. We specialize in working with authors who are self- or e-publishing using a variety of tools. We currently accept and edit works in both Microsoft Word and Open Office (among ot

[dev] re: HEAD: we broke gcc again...

2005-02-01 Thread Caolan McNamara
FWIW the internal compiler error in slideshow is probably http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19311 rather than http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15299 C. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additi

Re: [dev] Re: Inserting objects in documents

2005-02-10 Thread Mathias Bauer
Jiri Palecek wrote: > Mathias Bauer gmx.de> writes: > >> >> Jiri Palecek wrote: >> > Hi all, I have a question. Is there any way (best through UNO) to >> > insert an object in a document or to create an object that can be >> > inserted? >> >> You mean something like inserting a Chart into Writer:

Re: [dev] re: adding new menu items

2005-02-21 Thread Mathias Bauer
James Black wrote: > Where in the developers guide would I look to see how to add a menu > item, and to react to it? > > If I am just going to pull down information into a spreadsheet, with one > choice, and read the cells to save it, with another, I don't believe I > need a new component. > > I

Re: [dev] re: adding new menu items

2005-02-21 Thread Jayant B M
Hi James, On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:11 -0500, James Black wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Where in the developers guide would I look to see how to add a menu > item, and to react to it? sorry for this shortcut answer google on "mjayant menuitem". The blog could help yo

[dev] Re: Failure for build of langpack

2005-02-28 Thread Shkumbin Saneja
Hi, As at some people attachment may not appear, please find below message the log text: Hello, Trying to build localized build for Albanian language (sq) in windows. During regular dmake didn't produced albanian packages; then tried with: dmake ooolanguagepack (se attached log). In configure wa

[dev] Re: Failure for build of langpack

2005-03-04 Thread OOo Shqip
Again build for Albanian language did not have success :-(. As this is the 'new' language for OpenOffice.org, we faced some problems which described in issue: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43704. Is there required any scripts or patch to be run for new languages ,or how to pre

[dev] Re: Daniel is hired by Microsoft

2005-04-04 Thread Chuck
Daniel Carrera wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Guess what? I got a new job! Whooo hoo!! Yay money! > > I was hired as a technical writer for Microsoft's Office division. I > showed them my OOoAuthors work as a portolio, and they liked it. John > Durant was impressed by my Styles chapter. I will b

[dev] Re: Java / SWT / OpenOffice / Ole Problem

2005-04-28 Thread Tobias Himstedt
Good morning, Unfortunately I don't know anything about the SWT stuff. Is it providing an OLE container that stores the embedded document? And what is the file Unfortunatly I don't know anything about ole nor openoffice. But according to the (example) source code I first create a so called OleFram

[dev] Re: Java / SWT / OpenOffice / Ole Problem

2005-04-29 Thread Tobias Himstedt
>>oleClientSite = new OleClientSite(oleFrame, SWT.NONE, >>"opendocument.WriterDocument.1"); > > > That pretty much looks like OLE stuff. Yes, internalay this oleClient.save method results in a JNI which in turn calls a OleSave function (where ever that comes from). whereas boolean oleYesO

[dev] Re: Java / SWT / OpenOffice / Ole Problem

2005-05-02 Thread Tobias Himstedt
Unlikly as SWT does not know any internals of the embedded document and why should it just pick out the manifest.xml? I puzzled about this. If OOo documents are embedded as OLE servers they store themselves as OLE storage that contains a stream named "package_stream" and contains the whole zip fi

Re: [dev] re: simulating arrays in idl

2005-05-06 Thread Stephan Bergmann
James Black wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am starting some development to pull the a gradebook from our course management system, so the faculty members can manipulate the grades, then send them back. I am going to use a webservice to interface with the CMS. I need to get a

[dev] Re: On UI/dialogs in C++

2005-05-18 Thread aditya
I found an interesting site http://ui.openoffice.org. It does contain articles on localized res files and methods that create dialogs and stuff. I have still not been able to find a good text/document for this. - To unsubscribe,

[dev] Re: remove .xcu files [using configimport?]

2005-06-23 Thread Aditya Pandey
Joerg Barfurth sun.com> writes: > You don't need configimport to install a schema (xcs) or xcu file. > unopkg installs them in a private location. Thanks Joerg for helping on this. unopkg installs them in my addin folder. for example: /home/adipan/.openoffice.org1.9.91/user/uno_packages/ cache/

[dev] Re: basic macro to uno package

2005-06-28 Thread Ales Kahanek
Thank Daniel for your help. Now I got the package working! I have followed the guidelines from "Add On Tool" from http://www.ooomacros.org/dev.php Now I have created my own addon which can be installed to OOo. The last question is how to assign the macro from the addon to some OOo document ev

[dev] Re: macros emulation poor man's database

2005-07-06 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Interesting questions so I copied them back to the Dev list I am adding answers in-line. Uwe Brauer wrote: Hello The OO database is unfortunately no as comfortable as the scalc. Do you know about a macro which could do protect rows in a scalc document against partial sorting. Original ta

[dev] Re: [installation-users] Response file installation

2005-07-21 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:53 +0200, Urska Colner wrote: > hi > > i have two questions for you regarding the response file installation: > > 1. where can I find info on how to use the response file for silent > uninstall? > 2. how do I remove the Register window after the first installation? we >

Re: [dev] Re: [c++]openoffice exception handling

2005-08-08 Thread Daniel Boelzle
Hello aditya kumar pandey, > Modified bit of my code: >OUString oStr = OUString::createFromAscii("foo.Counter"); > try > { > throw (com::sun::star::uno::Exception()); > //also tried > //throw (com::sun::star::uno:

Re: [dev] Re: [c++]openoffice exception handling

2005-08-08 Thread Joerg Budischewski
Hi, please check, whether you have different versions of libstdc++ in your process (e.g. when analyzing the core with gdb, type info shared ). OOo and your code must be compiled with the same compiler (and thus with the same libstdc++, otherwise at least exception handling crashes ... I th

Re: [dev] Re: [c++]openoffice exception handling

2005-08-16 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Aditya Pandey wrote: Stephan Bergmann sun.com> writes: The Linux x86 OOo 1.9.x versions built by Sun contain a problematic libgcc_s.so.1 which causes the problem you describe: If some code is compiled with a GCC other than the exact version used inside Sun and then run in an environment whe

[dev] Re: Compilation error with gcc 3.3.5

2005-09-01 Thread Takashi Nakamoto
Hi, Yes, I use the prebuilded mozilla libraries. Does it cause this problem? We have to compile mozilla libraries with gcc 3.3.5, don't we? On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 12:57:58 +0200 Hans-Joachim Lankenau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi! > > did you use the prebuilded mozilla libraries? > > tschau...

[dev] Re: Compilation error with gcc 3.3.5

2005-09-01 Thread Takashi Nakamoto
Hi, On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:03:15 +0200 >From: Takashi Nakamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 01:53:44 +0900 > > Hi, > >> Yes, I use the prebuilded mozilla libraries. >> Does it cause this problem? We have to compile mozilla libraries with >> gcc 3.3.5, don't we?

[dev] Re: [users] OpenOffice.org 2.0 Release Candidate

2005-09-29 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
Please do not cross-post in this manner. users is the list you want. I cannot reproduce your claim. I suspect that your browser needs to refresh its cache. Please go http://www.openoffice.org/ , click on the 2.0rc link and when you get there, hold down the Shift key and click reload. Once the page

[dev] Re: Converting XHTML to Open Document

2005-10-07 Thread Cameron Zemek
> A simple approach for the above demands could be the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is producting the same problem as my rules where the closing is after that sub list. Eg. item1 . Whereas it should be item1 > But b

[dev] Re: [native-lang] Happy Birthday OpenOffice.org!

2005-10-14 Thread Daniel Carrera
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: [snip] Global Marketing Contacts Jacqueline McNally (UTC +08h00) OpenOffice.org Marketing Project Lead [EMAIL PROTECTED] +61 (8) 9474-3021 John McCreesh (UTC +01h00) OpenOffice.org Marketing Project Co-Lead [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 (131) 523-9218 Louis Suarez-Potts OpenO

[dev] Re: [discuss] OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Here

2005-10-21 Thread John Boyle
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: All, OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Here 20 October, 2005 OpenOffice.org 2.0 is the productivity suite that individuals, governments, and corporations around the world have been expecting for the last two years. Easy to use and fluidly interoperable with every major off

[dev] Re: [com] a BIG thank you

2005-10-24 Thread Charles-H.Schulz
Thank you Jacqueline! I'd also like to thank all the PR team, the development teams up there in Hamburg, and of course all the Native-Language communities who are working out there towards the final localization of the 2.0... After all these days it's rather moving to see the 2.0 getting a life of

Re: [dev] Re: [cws-announce] mmeeks11: created

2005-10-26 Thread michael meeks
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 22:18 +0200, Pavel Janík wrote: > Ah, I misread the description. Does this mean that someone (some distro > or ?) is using them? If so, it is OK, of course. But I still wonder why > icons were "broken"... We use & ship them along with other icons not in cvs for licen

[dev] Re: [discuss] Incubator for vba macros

2005-12-10 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi Noel Thanks for your proposal and your presentation I'm aware that VBA macros are a problem on a migration and something has to be done. So you're proposal is welcomed Nevertheless, I'm afraid that using VBA paradigm inside OOo will more hurt than solve the problem. VBA has 2 parts : the

[dev] Re: [xml-dev] rel-column-width

2005-12-19 Thread Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
Matthew, the style:rel-column-width attribute is described in section 15.9.1 of the OpenDocument specification: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12573/OpenDocument-v1.0-os.sxw I assume OpenOffice.org has inserted the attributes because there was no absolute width specified for

Re: [dev] Re: OpenOffice.org Developer Article Contest

2006-01-09 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Andrew Brown wrote: Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:43BFFE6C.6050400 @indesko.com: This sounds a good idea I would like to write an article, so I can not be in the comitee :( Btw, here is a suggestion for the commitee A winner is automaticxally in the comitee for 3 sessions r

Re: [dev] Re: OpenOffice.org Developer Article Contest

2006-01-09 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Laurent Godard wrote: Hi Jurgen Btw, here is a suggestion for the commitee A winner is automaticxally in the comitee for 3 sessions replacing the oldest i don't think that this would be a good idea. why ? do i miss something ? What if I won and I did NOT want to be a judge? -- Andrew P

Re: [dev] Re: OpenOffice.org Developer Article Contest

2006-01-09 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi Jurgen Btw, here is a suggestion for the commitee A winner is automaticxally in the comitee for 3 sessions replacing the oldest i don't think that this would be a good idea. why ? do i miss something ? obviously, they would not be the only judges they would be complementary to establish

Re: [dev] Re: OpenOffice.org Developer Article Contest

2006-01-09 Thread Edvaldo Jr.
I think this would be in the contest rules. --- Andrew Douglas Pitonyak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Laurent Godard wrote: > > > Hi Jurgen > > > Btw, here is a suggestion for the commitee > A winner is automaticxally in the comitee for 3 > sessions > replacing the oldest > >>> >

[dev] Re: TextField (Title,Subject,Comments, etc.)

2006-02-15 Thread Vincenzo Giuliano
Vincenzo Giuliano wrote: Hi ALL, my name is Vincenzo. I have a question for YOU. How can I read the Writer document properties (File -> Properties ->) in Java code? I seen the developer's guide but I don't understand as I have to do. Thank you ALL For example, how can I read the Writer docume

[dev] Re: [api-dev] Code Snippet page

2006-03-08 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
i noticed that we have made good progress with our Code Snippets in the past two weeks, thanks to all contributors. At this point i'd like to say thank you again to Tom and Paolo who are responsible for the infrastructure and tooling. Tom provides and has implemented the infrastructure and Pa

[dev] Re: Development with the UNO framework

2006-05-08 Thread Roger Blum
Hi Cedric, Thanks for your reply. "Cedric Bosdonnat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Roger, > > Roger Blum a écrit : > >> I have a rather general question about the possibility to use the UNO >> framework for the development of a client/server application (

[dev] Re: Installing And Bypassing Registration Prompt

2006-05-18 Thread Hal Vaughan
Chris H wrote: > The easiest way I have found to do this is edit > > \OpenOffice.org 2.0\share\registry\data\org\openoffice\setup.xcu > > Change > > > false > > > to > > > true > > > > Then add this right below it: > > > 2006-05-16T12:55:49 > > > true > Great. I had figured out t

[dev] Re: [users] OO default configuration files

2006-05-25 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 13:30 -0500, Joe Byers wrote: > Does anyone know of a reference to OO2.0 default configuration files? > The users list is probably not the best place to ask questions on the internals. You may get an answer you may not from this list; however, I would like to direct you to t

[dev] Re: [documentation-dev] creating Excel files

2006-07-03 Thread Sigrid Kronenberger
Hi Dave, Dave Calkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I'm developing a commercial app which generates large data sets. We > have a need to be able to create Excel files containing the data along > > with charts, images, etc. I was thinking a good option might be to > re-use the relevant Open

[dev] Re: [documentation-dev] creating Excel files

2006-07-04 Thread Dave Calkins
Looks like I posted to the wrong area. oops! If anyone can provide any advice wrt creating Excel files using OpenOffice.org, I'd appreciate it. You can see my original post in the below. I'd like to be able to export to an Excel file from my app which will be running in a shop floor enviro

[dev] Re: [discuss] OpenOffice_Dev installations without systemintegration

2006-07-10 Thread Ingrid Halama
-> issue 67179 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67179 Ingrid Halama schrieb: Hi, I would like to suggest to skip the systemintegration and the whole installation process for the developer snapshot builds and instead create a file archive (zip,gz) which simply extracts to a rea

[dev] Re: Commentaire sur le correcteur orthographique

2006-07-12 Thread Gloops
Le 12/07/2006 19:03, gilles bignebat a écrit : Gloops a écrit : Bonjour tout le monde, Bonjour ...Gloops! Bon, OK, par défaut la version française de Ooo est installée avec deux versions de correcteur swahéli, en plus de l'Italien et du Thaï, mais pas le Français. J'avoue que dans la vie co

[dev] Re: [releases] OOo 2.0.4 status meeting

2006-08-22 Thread Caolan McNamara
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 12:56 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: > We still have some stoppers open (68776, animated gifs, 68046, API > problem) and cws warningfixes03 (build breakage), cws hro08, so that we > target OOD680m3 for release candidate by the end of this week. > > Initial inactivity time

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >