[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tyler Riddle wrote: | I had a nasty problem with freenet making my computer | unusable too. However, on a unix box, this is super | easy to solve and I have never had that problem again | since the first day it happned. | | Just nice the java process

[freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:09 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Matthew Toseland (toad at amphibian.dyndns.org) wrote: > > This is because I use a mail client that makes that style not only > > usable but natural (mutt). You should too :) > > Check my

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oskar Sandberg wrote: | On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:53:45AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: | |>The new load balancing code is a very good thing indeed, but I doubt it will |>save individual nodes from massive overload. It didn't save me.. |> |>Has

[freenet-dev] Um...

tps://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/00da17c4/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Status of Fred with GCJ?

8 -- Robbe -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.ng Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/7567fc69/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Status of Fred with GCJ?

pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/3178784c/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.5.0.2

... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/77eb0ae8/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

il/devl/attachments/20021029/8b0645fe/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] 526 reports nodes over 600 as highest seen build

e URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/30b4432a/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Re: Fishtools (fwd)

gzip up the the log file and send it to me. --gj On Tuesday 29 October 2002 14:46, fish wrote: > I removed the log attachment, but suffice to say, if you feed a file of > about 5-10meg to the FEC encoder under certain circumstances, you get an > out of error message from fred, and it closes the

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

t > devl at freenetproject.org > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/d3e3c7c9/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

et/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/1d2a8050/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

Sorry, I didn't actually see any reply in that from Matthew. I just saw 100% of the original message, quoted. Are my mailer settings wrong? d - Original Message - On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:57:45AM -0800, Jon Brock wrote: > After my node sat idle for a while, my log filled up with

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Cross site scripting ...

> the following executes custom html. > > http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test');%3C/script%3E True - for example : http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test1%3cH1%3etest2%3c/H1%3 e');%3C/script%3E The code that displays the "Unexpected key" page should really

[freenet-dev] Minor nit bug

-- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 155 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/54338145/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] windows 0.5.0.2 online

I've uploaded 0.5.0.2 monolithic and webinstalls. Both distributions have changed. There is better text (re: deleting temp directory), automatic setting of idle priority, and a localhost fix to get rid of all those pesky entries. Everyone should download this if just for the idle priority

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Cross site scripting ...

ch possibly redirect to an external site? --Dan -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 155 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/d0649525/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:53:45AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: > The new load balancing code is a very good thing indeed, but I doubt it will > save individual nodes from massive overload. > > Has anyone conclusively figured out the CPU usage issue? I had high CPU usage yesterday when the

[freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

rg |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/d3f51cd2/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Somebody (Spark) broke the build...

/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/d1750d96/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -- ne

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/66653600/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Minor nit bug

If you create a node with a null store cipher, then configure a store cipher: Oct 29, 2002 4:09:46 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading node keys: node_3581 Oct 29, 2002 4:09:46 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Unexpected Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException

[freenet-dev] Fwd: Re: Freenet 0.5

A bug? - Forwarded message from Alex Volkmer - From: "Alex Volkmer" To: "Ian Clarke" Subject: Re: Freenet 0.5 Hallo again, in my case, this temp-folder is not a regulary temp-folder. I always use an ordinary folder as temporary folder. It?s only named

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.5.0.2 released

http://locut.us/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/cbc61431/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Growing pains

> From: Ian Clarke > Date: 28 Oct 2002 18:23:33 -0800 > > It seems that the flood of new users over the past day has caused > Freenet some growing pains - it wouldn't surprise me if the network > grew 10X or even 20X over the past 15 hours. > > Unfortunately this rapid growth has created a

[freenet-dev] Transient nodes & Freenet Growing Pains

[Naive suggestion enclosed...] I've been reading through the various posts that postulate the recent freenet slowdown is due to transient nodes. As far as I understand things, transient nodes are essentially 'parasites' living off the network without giving anything back. Here's my latest silly

[freenet-dev] 526 reports nodes over 600 as highest seen build

I would include a patch but I think it would take who ever is going to fix it longer to apply the patch then it would to type in the 20 characters that make up the difference in that line between 526 and 525. To make it easy as possible it is on line 586 of node/NodeReference.java Tyler =

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

At 07.01 29/10/02 -0500, you wrote: >> Currently rel-0-5-1 has it >[...] > >A word of warning to people who may try this: port 8889 is GONE. The >node status stuff has been merged into port . What about distribution port ? Better, what about distribution service ??? Ciao. Marco -- +

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

I was not insuating you were doing something wrong - I was actualy using your case as an example of why the default start-freenet.sh should nice the java process - if anyone who has the desire to fix it noticed I hope they do. Or would it be beter if I made the (trivial) patch and posted it to

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer Problem

- Original Message - From: "Reuben Balik" > Whenever i try to run freenet-0.5.0.1.exe that I > download off the sourceforge server i get an error > that says that installer verification has failed. > Does anyone else get this? I tried downloading it > again from a

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

I had a nasty problem with freenet making my computer unusable too. However, on a unix box, this is super easy to solve and I have never had that problem again since the first day it happned. Just nice the java process to something other then 0. I run my node at nice 10 but if you wanted a good

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

The new load balancing code is a very good thing indeed, but I doubt it will save individual nodes from massive overload. Has anyone conclusively figured out the CPU usage issue? I suspect that there might have been a regression somewhere between 600 and 603, however, it is impossible to test

[freenet-dev] If you are seeing extraordinary CPU usage with 600+ builds:

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 18:25, Derek Glidden wrote: > On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 17:53, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > > Try switching to using FastThreadFactory (setting your maxThreads to > > -120 (or whatever value you want time -1)). I think it may be caused by > > some by threadfactory issue - if it

[freenet-dev] Fproxy regression & snapshot cleaning

The stable build 526 0.5.0.1 had a regression in new build checking; now the stable build consider the unstable 603 as new build. In addition, there are a little mess in the snapshot directory; for a would be node operator is very confusing. I suggest a major cleaning of old files, moving

[freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

After my node sat idle for a while, my log filled up with messages like this: Oct 29, 2002 12:20:14 PM (freenet.MessageHandler, QThread-219): MessageFactory.java, Message constructor threw exception. java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.Long.toString(Long.java:98)

[freenet-dev] Fproxy keytype default

This suggestion is a trivial thing to implement, but would do no harm if wrong, and can help to reshape the load if correct. I remember to heard some concern about this weeks ago, but . If the user type something in the retrieve field, Fproxy by default assume freenet: & KSK key, if no

[freenet-dev] Native DS key loss?

- why is it so many of us die copies?" --Edward Young -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: log.gz Type: application/x-gunzip Size: 5900 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/2002

[freenet-dev] Builds 524 and 600

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 harik at chaos.ao.net wrote: > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > Somebody suggested using a 'skip the local node' flag, but from looking > > > at the CVS, that only seems to be used by Fproxy's splitfile retrievel > > > interface, and doesn't feature in

[freenet-dev] is it just me?

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I don't think that the solution to the network overloading is through > > more effective throttling though. An overloaded Freenet does not decay > > gracefully it would seem. A more preferable failure mode would be longer > > waits rather then

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer Problem

Whenever i try to run freenet-0.5.0.1.exe that I download off the sourceforge server i get an error that says that installer verification has failed. Does anyone else get this? I tried downloading it again from a different mirror and I got the same message. --Reuben

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

ct.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/81453a9e/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

- Original Message - From: "Greg Wooledge" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer SiliconZealot (siliconzealot at attbi.com) wrote: >> Maybe explain where to find what >> their IP is? How about suggesting they click

[freenet-dev] problems with fastthreadfactory?

For the first time in quite a while (months), my node locked up and held onto my internet connection, so other applications couldn't use it. Due to the heavy /.ing I moved from stable 525 to 603 and turned on load balancing and threads from +160 to -160. My node was up on 525 all day during the

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

d... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/2be24c97/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

evl/attachments/20021029/693921b1/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] If you are seeing extraordinary CPU usage with 600+ builds:

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:11:21PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: > On Monday 28 October 2002 17:53, you wrote: > > Try switching to using FastThreadFactory (setting your maxThreads to > > -120 (or whatever value you want time -1)). I think it may be caused by > > some by threadfactory issue - if

[freenet-dev] is it just me?

or is there RNF's everywhere right now? it's making it really hard to insert arg. (congrats to the developers for shipping something, btw :) -fish ___ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org

[freenet-dev] If you are seeing extraordinary CPU usage with 600+ builds:

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 06:25:22PM -0500, Derek Glidden wrote: > On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 17:53, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > > Try switching to using FastThreadFactory (setting your maxThreads to > > -120 (or whatever value you want time -1)). I think it may be caused by > > some by threadfactory

[freenet-dev] What is the earliest that we can release 0.5.1?

org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/853c924b/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Using the web interface from machine other than localhost

Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021029/3eaed8da/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] is it just me?

an.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: ap

[freenet-dev] Fproxy keytype default

This suggestion is a trivial thing to implement, but would do no harm if wrong, and can help to reshape the load if correct. I remember to heard some concern about this weeks ago, but . If the user type something in the retrieve field, Fproxy by default assume freenet: KSK key, if no

[freenet-dev] Fproxy regression snapshot cleaning

The stable build 526 0.5.0.1 had a regression in new build checking; now the stable build consider the unstable 603 as new build. In addition, there are a little mess in the snapshot directory; for a would be node operator is very confusing. I suggest a major cleaning of old files, moving

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

SiliconZealot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maybe explain where to find what their IP is? How about suggesting they click here: http://www.whatismyip.com/ That will detect their ISP's transparent web proxy. They need to run WINIPCFG (at least in the DOS-based Windows releases; I don't know

[freenet-dev] problems with fastthreadfactory?

For the first time in quite a while (months), my node locked up and held onto my internet connection, so other applications couldn't use it. Due to the heavy /.ing I moved from stable 525 to 603 and turned on load balancing and threads from +160 to -160. My node was up on 525 all day during the

[freenet-dev] Native DS key loss?

Attached is a gzipped log of a recent ~18 hour node run. The node actually stopped running on its own - I woke up this morning and I'm not exactly sure when it went down, but it terminated itself. I had a 1GB datastore with about 6,000 keys in it. After restarting the node, I had 300 keys in

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer Problem

Whenever i try to run freenet-0.5.0.1.exe that I download off the sourceforge server i get an error that says that installer verification has failed. Does anyone else get this? I tried downloading it again from a different mirror and I got the same message. --Reuben

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

The new load balancing code is a very good thing indeed, but I doubt it will save individual nodes from massive overload. Has anyone conclusively figured out the CPU usage issue? I suspect that there might have been a regression somewhere between 600 and 603, however, it is impossible to test

[freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

After my node sat idle for a while, my log filled up with messages like this: Oct 29, 2002 12:20:14 PM (freenet.MessageHandler, QThread-219): MessageFactory.java, Message constructor threw exception. java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.Long.toString(Long.java:98)

Re: [freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Jon Brock wrote: Also, I'd like to get involved with freenet development, is there any particular place you suggest I start? My initial thought was to build on the FCP to make it easier for apps to do split files, especially with FEC. if you're going to attack that, you

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:54:10AM -0500, SiliconZealot wrote: - Original Message - From: Greg Wooledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer SiliconZealot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maybe

Re: [freenet-dev] Growing pains

On 29 Oct 2002, Michael Wiktowy wrote: Take a look at the webpage logs to see how many more visitors it got that day. I would bet that it is not as many as you think. Why do I think that? Where is the enevitable flood of whining Freenet sucks ... I couldn't get anything through it/ I

[freenet-dev] Re: Fishtools (fwd)

I removed the log attachment, but suffice to say, if you feed a file of about 5-10meg to the FEC encoder under certain circumstances, you get an out of error message from fred, and it closes the FCP connection very disgracefully. I think it should at *least* catch the exception and return an FCP

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oskar Sandberg wrote: | On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:53:45AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: | |The new load balancing code is a very good thing indeed, but I doubt it will |save individual nodes from massive overload. It didn't save me.. | |Has anyone

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

I had a nasty problem with freenet making my computer unusable too. However, on a unix box, this is super easy to solve and I have never had that problem again since the first day it happned. Just nice the java process to something other then 0. I run my node at nice 10 but if you wanted a good

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tyler Riddle wrote: | I had a nasty problem with freenet making my computer | unusable too. However, on a unix box, this is super | easy to solve and I have never had that problem again | since the first day it happned. | | Just nice the java process

Re: [freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:08:47PM -, Dave Hooper wrote: Sorry, I didn't actually see any reply in that from Matthew. I just saw 100% of the original message, quoted. Are my mailer settings wrong? I said Sorry, but this has to be a JVM problem. d - Original Message - On Tue,

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

I was not insuating you were doing something wrong - I was actualy using your case as an example of why the default start-freenet.sh should nice the java process - if anyone who has the desire to fix it noticed I hope they do. Or would it be beter if I made the (trivial) patch and posted it to

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:06:30PM -0800, Tyler Riddle wrote: I was not insuating you were doing something wrong - I was actualy using your case as an example of why the default start-freenet.sh should nice the java process - if anyone who has the desire to fix it noticed I hope they do.

Re: [freenet-dev] Status of Fred with GCJ?

Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi. Kaffe has stopped working for fred, so GCJ is the only remaining Free way to run java. What's status? Compiling to bytecode with gcj and running them with gij or kaffe is broken. Running Sun-compiled bytecode with gij or kaffe is broken. Am

[freenet-dev] Transient nodes Freenet Growing Pains

[Naive suggestion enclosed...] I've been reading through the various posts that postulate the recent freenet slowdown is due to transient nodes. As far as I understand things, transient nodes are essentially 'parasites' living off the network without giving anything back. Here's my latest silly

[freenet-dev] Minor nit bug

If you create a node with a null store cipher, then configure a store cipher: Oct 29, 2002 4:09:46 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading node keys: node_3581 Oct 29, 2002 4:09:46 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Unexpected Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tyler Riddle wrote: | I was not insuating you were doing something wrong - I | was actualy using your case as an example of why the | default start-freenet.sh should nice the java process | - if anyone who has the desire to fix it noticed I | hope

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Cross site scripting ...

Hmm, that's EXACTLY what my node says before the so-called fix. And I've just reproduced EXACTLY the same behaviour again on the current freenet-latest.jar. However it DOES appear to be fixed in the latest freenet-unstable-latest.jar (603 I believe) Someone care to rerelease the 5xx branch with

Re: [freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

Dave Hooper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Sorry, I didn't actually see any reply in that from Matthew. I just saw 100% of the original message, quoted. Are my mailer settings wrong? Matthew's style takes a little getting used to. He doesn't put any blank lines between his comments and the part

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.5.0.2 released

Freenet 0.5.0.2 is now available for download. Please upgrade to this version, it resolves a number of issues which were revealed by the recent 0.5 release. You can get the Windows installer from: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-webinstall.exe?download You can get the unix

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Cross site scripting ...

the following executes custom html. http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test');%3C/script%3E True - for example : http://127.0.0.1:/%3Cscript%3Edocument.write('test1%3cH1%3etest2%3c/H1%3 e');%3C/script%3E The code that displays the Unexpected key page should really HTMLise

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Cross site scripting ...

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Dave Hooper wrote: Hmm, that's EXACTLY what my node says before the so-called fix. And I've just reproduced EXACTLY the same behaviour again on the current freenet-latest.jar. However it DOES appear to be fixed in the latest freenet-unstable-latest.jar (603 I believe)

Re: [freenet-dev] Minor nit bug

And another: using fproxy to insert with a blank key attempts KSK (and collides) rather then creating a CHK key for you. Of the two, I think the latter is probably more sensible (gives you a key you can request with) rather then the former (you have to type CHK and re-insert) --Dan

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Fishtools (fwd)

gzip up the the log file and send it to me. --gj On Tuesday 29 October 2002 14:46, fish wrote: I removed the log attachment, but suffice to say, if you feed a file of about 5-10meg to the FEC encoder under certain circumstances, you get an out of error message from fred, and it closes the

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: Re: Freenet 0.5

On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:04:30AM -, Dave Hooper wrote: Sounds like exactly the same thing the guy on Support reported today (you know, the guy that Matt Toseland shot down with READ THE FUCKING DOCUMENTATION YOU FUCKING MORON, which I thought was a little harsh). So was the guy. Sorry.

Re: [freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:26:35PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: Dave Hooper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Sorry, I didn't actually see any reply in that from Matthew. I just saw 100% of the original message, quoted. Are my mailer settings wrong? Matthew's style takes a little getting used

Re: [freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This is because I use a mail client that makes that style not only usable but natural (mutt). You should too :) Check my headers. -- Greg Wooledge | Truth belongs to everybody. [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot

Re: [freenet-dev] weird error after upgrading to 603

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:09 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote: Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This is because I use a mail client that makes that style not only usable but natural (mutt). You should too :) Check my headers. howcome

[freenet-dev] Build broken in HEAD branch

compile: [javac] Compiling 706 source files to /usr2/giannij_space/freenet_module/fr eenet/build [javac] /usr2/giannij_space/freenet_module/freenet/src/freenet/support/Fields.java:282: setTimeInMillis(long) has protected access in java.util.Calendar [javac]

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 13:39, you wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:53:45AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: The new load balancing code is a very good thing indeed, but I doubt it will save individual nodes from massive overload. Has anyone conclusively figured out the CPU usage issue?

[freenet-dev] windows 0.5.0.2 online

I've uploaded 0.5.0.2 monolithic and webinstalls. Both distributions have changed. There is better text (re: deleting temp directory), automatic setting of idle priority, and a localhost fix to get rid of all those pesky entries. Everyone should download this if just for the idle priority