[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Dienstag 07 April 2009 10:28:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > >> > > git tag -s -m > > Can you also sign a revision without tagging it? > > No. > In DVCS model, signing single revision does not make sense > -- since you will merge / rebase that revision as soon as it is merged. I think it does

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Dienstag 07 April 2009 10:28:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng: git tag -s name commit -m message Can you also sign a revision without tagging it? No. In DVCS model, signing single revision does not make sense -- since you will merge / rebase that revision as soon as it is merged. I think it

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Tuesday 07 April 2009 09:24:10 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Samstag 04 April 2009 22:50:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any > code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the > would-be litigant with the

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Tuesday 07 April 2009 09:24:10 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: Am Samstag 04 April 2009 22:50:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland: Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the would-be litigant with the identity of

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Wednesday 08 April 2009 16:22:03 guido wrote: > > Your pgp signature is charset corrupted. > The pgp signature is pure ASCII, how can it possibly be charset corrupted? Because there are encodings out there that don?t care about the lowest 7 bit being ASCII. Admittedly, they are far and

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Wednesday 08 April 2009 16:22:03 guido wrote: Your pgp signature is charset corrupted. The pgp signature is pure ASCII, how can it possibly be charset corrupted? Because there are encodings out there that don’t care about the lowest 7 bit being ASCII. Admittedly, they are far and

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag, 3. April 2009 02:30:09 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > > NextGen$ > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > [..] > > > G3IAoIo? > > Your pgp signature is charset corrupted. The pgp signature is pure ASCII, how can it possibly be charset corrupted? Looks fine to me, btw. -- | _ |

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag, 3. April 2009 02:30:09 schrieb Daniel Cheng: NextGen$ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- [..] G3IAoIo⎿伜堏鍙䶞㢈榷㑴 Your pgp signature is charset corrupted. The pgp signature is pure ASCII, how can it possibly be charset corrupted? Looks fine to me, btw. -- | _ | ASCII Ribbon

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Samstag 04 April 2009 03:29:57 schrieb David ?Bombe? Roden: >> On Friday 03 April 2009 18:29:04 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> > > > $ hg sign [REVISION] >> > > >> > > git tag -s -m >> > >> > Is that a GnuPG signed tag? >> >>

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Samstag 04 April 2009 22:50:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the would-be litigant with the identity of the committer, we don't have this problem. Sure. That's why

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Samstag 04 April 2009 03:29:57 schrieb David ‘Bombe’ Roden: On Friday 03 April 2009 18:29:04 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: $ hg sign [REVISION] git tag -s name commit -m message Is that a GnuPG signed tag? Yes. Check [1] for an example. Thanks! (also to Daniel Cheng who

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Samstag 04 April 2009 22:50:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland: Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the would-be litigant with the identity of the committer, we don't have this problem. Sure. That's why

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de wrote: Am Samstag 04 April 2009 03:29:57 schrieb David ‘Bombe’ Roden: On Friday 03 April 2009 18:29:04 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: $ hg sign [REVISION] git tag -s name commit -m message Is that a GnuPG signed

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Sunday 05 April 2009 15:55:38 Daniel Cheng wrote: >> Building untrusted binaries is not really impossible -- >> I have known some people running public build service with sandbox >> for long. But these kind of service have high

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Sunday 05 April 2009 15:55:38 Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:09:14 Ian Clarke wrote: > >> Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource > >> the repository hosting. ?For example, if

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Sunday 05 April 2009 15:55:38 Daniel Cheng wrote: On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:09:14 Ian Clarke wrote: Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting.  For

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Sunday 05 April 2009 15:55:38 Daniel Cheng wrote: Building untrusted binaries is not really impossible -- I have known some people running public build service with sandbox for long. But these kind of service

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:09:14 Ian Clarke wrote: >> Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource >> the repository hosting. ?For example, if its git, we should use github. >> >> Reasons: >> >> - At least in

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:09:14 Ian Clarke wrote: Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting.  For example, if its git, we should use github. Reasons: -

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:09:14 Ian Clarke wrote: > Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource > the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. > > Reasons: > > - At least in the case of github, it will be free > - We don't have to worry

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 15:50:28 Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Florent Daigni?re < > nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > > Okay, so it's technically possible (anyway, pulling on a regular basis > > was also an option)... but do we want to fetch code from a remote host

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 09:31:06 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > > DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution. > > > > However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us. > > Personally I think it important for freenet to

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 18:29:04 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > $ hg sign [REVISION] > > git tag -s -m > Is that a GnuPG signed tag? Yes. Check [1] for an example. David [1]:

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/4 Arne Babenhauserheide : > Am Freitag 03 April 2009 17:19:13 schrieb David ?Bombe? Roden: >> On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> > $ hg sign [REVISION] >> >> git tag -s -m > > Is that a GnuPG signed tag? "-s" is "sign" > > Best wishes, > Arne

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Daniel Cheng [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: > >> 2009/4/3 Florent Daigni?re : >>> * Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ >>> freenetproject.org>wrote: > Toad said on an other thread you

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 09:31:06 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng: DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution. However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us. Personally I think it important for freenet to slowly

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 15:50:28 Ian Clarke wrote: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Okay, so it's technically possible (anyway, pulling on a regular basis was also an option)... but do we want to fetch code from a remote host we don't

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:09:14 Ian Clarke wrote: Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. Reasons: - At least in the case of github, it will be free - We don't have to worry about

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 17:19:13 schrieb David ?Bombe? Roden: > On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > $ hg sign [REVISION] > > git tag -s -m Is that a GnuPG signed tag? Best wishes, Arne -- -- Ein W?rfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-)

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Daniel Cheng wrote: > Florent Daigni?re wrote: >> * Daniel Cheng [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: >> >>> 2009/4/3 Florent Daigni?re : * Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ freenetproject.org>wrote: > >> Toad

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > $ hg sign [REVISION] git tag -s -m Built-in. David -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 12:18:11 schrieb Florent Daigni?re: > Sure we can do that... but how integrated are the PGP/GPG modules with > git/hg? What about the GUI versions? At least for hg you can just activate the gpg extension (distributed with hg) and can then sign changesets with $ hg sign

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Daniel Cheng [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: > 2009/4/3 Florent Daigni?re : > > * Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: > > > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ >> freenetproject.org>wrote: > >> > >> > Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution. > > However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us. Personally I think it important for freenet to slowly establish a workflow where people contribute pseudonymously, because

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Florent Daigni?re < nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > Okay, so it's technically possible (anyway, pulling on a regular basis > was also an option)... but do we want to fetch code from a remote host > we don't control and auto-run it on emu? The building

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/3 Florent Daigni?re : > * Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ > freenetproject.org>wrote: >> >> > Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of >> > "workflow" : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does >>

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/3 Arne Babenhauserheide : > Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke: >> If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks: >> >> http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks >> >> I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is >> currently, with

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke: > If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks: > > http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks > > I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is > currently, with developers pushing to a single

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ freenetproject.org>wrote: > > > Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of > > "workflow" : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does > > what > > you have written above

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng: DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution. However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us. Personally I think it important for freenet to slowly establish a workflow where people contribute pseudonymously, because that

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Daniel Cheng j16sdiz+free...@gmail.com [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: 2009/4/3 Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org: * Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 12:18:11 schrieb Florent Daignière: Sure we can do that... but how integrated are the PGP/GPG modules with git/hg? What about the GUI versions? At least for hg you can just activate the gpg extension (distributed with hg) and can then sign changesets with $ hg sign

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote: Okay, so it's technically possible (anyway, pulling on a regular basis was also an option)... but do we want to fetch code from a remote host we don't control and auto-run it on emu? The building process

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: $ hg sign [REVISION] git tag -s name commit -m message Built-in. David signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Florent Daignière wrote: * Daniel Cheng j16sdiz+free...@gmail.com [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: 2009/4/3 Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org: * Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Daniel Cheng wrote: Florent Daignière wrote: * Daniel Cheng j16sdiz+free...@gmail.com [2009-04-03 08:30:09]: 2009/4/3 Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org: * Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote:

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 17:19:13 schrieb David ‘Bombe’ Roden: On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: $ hg sign [REVISION] git tag -s name commit -m message Is that a GnuPG signed tag? Best wishes, Arne -- -- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/4 Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de: Am Freitag 03 April 2009 17:19:13 schrieb David ‘Bombe’ Roden: On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: $ hg sign [REVISION] git tag -s name commit -m message Is that a GnuPG signed tag? -s is sign Best wishes, Arne

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Friday 03 April 2009 18:29:04 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: $ hg sign [REVISION] git tag -s name commit -m message Is that a GnuPG signed tag? Yes. Check [1] for an example. David [1]:

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke [2009-04-02 13:09:14]: > Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource > the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. > > Reasons: > > - At least in the case of github, it will be free > - We don't have to worry about setting

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ wrote: > Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of > "workflow" : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does > what > you have written above integrate in the picture? > > Now I am confused. > > Do we want to lose

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. Reasons: - At least in the case of github, it will be free - We don't have to worry about setting up and administering the repository - Services like

[freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. Reasons: - At least in the case of github, it will be free - We don't have to worry about setting up and administering the repository - Services like

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com [2009-04-02 13:09:14]: Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. Reasons: - At least in the case of github, it will be free - We don't have to worry

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of workflow : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does what you have written above integrate in the picture? Now I am confused. Do

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

* Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of workflow : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does what you have written

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke: If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks: http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is currently, with developers pushing to a single authoritative

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/3 Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de: Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke: If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks: http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is currently,

Re: [freenet-dev] git/hg hosting

2009/4/3 Florent Daignière nextg...@freenetproject.org: * Ian Clarke i...@locut.us [2009-04-02 17:44:37]: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM, NextGen$ nextg...@freenetproject.orgwrote: Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of workflow : all the devs are pushing to