Andy,
I have re-edited this response three times now. I was trying to offer
something that would contribute to the greater good.
I have nothing to offer to the greater good.
I have come to the conclusion that I really don't care about band plans
at such a detailed level.
I respect what you
Be right there.
philw de ka1gmn
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:41 AM, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD <
wd4...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> trying 18.110 usb for anyone willing to try.
>
> david/wd4kpd
>
>
--
Philw de KA1GMN
ROS is illegal.
For everyone.
Along with thinking outside of the box.
Please place yourselves under house arrest.
You are hereby FINED.
Mail your checks to KA1GMN.
philw
>
Thanks Andy.
PhilW de KA1GMN
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 22:46 -0500, Andy obrien wrote:
>
> Up to 4.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:11 PM, phil williams
> wrote:
>
> What rates if any, are available in DM 780 for THROB and
> THROBX?
What rates if any, are available in DM 780 for THROB and THROBX?
PhilW de KA1GMN
I have head in the past of folks of 'reminded' using the ALE frequencies
for other modes is frowned upon. I personally never heeded the advice
as I am of the opinion that if the frequency in not in use, then it's up
for grabs.
I have not heard about any proposal on the table about a proposal to
e
Impressive.
philw de ka1gmn
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> Finally! When I bought my TS-2000 a couple of years ago, I was aware
> of one criticism for the digital operator super narrow filtering
> in SSB was not as easy to achieve as in other rigs.It can be done
Dave,
"The defensive approach drives off everyone but the true believers; only
something incredibly valuable can survive this."
Well put.
philw de ka1gmn
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
>
>
> Re “the control is to prevent ALE bashing"
>
>
>
> Across a broad range of techni
"I am their first MFSK16 QSO and it is usually because they are running one
of the packages that has RSID"
This has been my experience too. I operate THOR4 and Contestia. Most
first time QSOs are with the aid of RSID.
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Wes Cosand wrote:
>
>
Thanks for the info Ron. 73 philw de ka1gmn
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Ron Wenig wrote:
>
>
> Oops, I forgot to mention it looks like the best time to hear them is
> early in the day.
>
>
> Ron ny3j
>
> phil williams wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ron,
ing. Just
> like sending a Jpeg file over the internet.
>
> 73, Ron ny3j
>
> phil williams wrote:
> >
> >
> > I downloaded Easypal this afternoon. I have been listening on 14.233
> > MHz and have managed to capture number of images that were sent by
> othe
I downloaded Easypal this afternoon. I have been listening on 14.233
MHz and have managed to capture number of images that were sent by other
stations.
In terms of setting TX audio levels, any suggestions? I take it that
the transmitted signal is wide, so the Tx power output will appear
artifici
Dave,
There is some Olivia activity on 7.043.250, but is sparse. Most of the
acitivity I copy is Cuban and US stations.
73
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:49 AM, A wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone actually use 7.043.250 ?
>
> All the data I can find indicates that this should
Thanks for all the answers. I will download it this week.
philw de ka1gmn
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> Phil, Easypal is a whole different world. Makes MMSSTV appear antique.
> Give it a try some time.
>
> Andy K3UK
>
>
>
>
>
I see you mentioned Easypal. How is it in comparison to MMSSTV?
philw de ka1gmn
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:00 PM, obrienaj wrote:
>
>
> So, it has been a while since I have seen anything NEW in SSTV. The flurry
> of activity around narrow SSTV was fun. So was the Easypal stuff. What is
> the la
N4ES got me started with MMSSTV today for the first time. Had my first SSTV
QSO.
Lots of fun.
philw de ka1gmn
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:00 PM, obrienaj wrote:
>
>
> So, it has been a while since I have seen anything NEW in SSTV. The flurry
> of activity around narrow SSTV was fun. So was the E
l zones than it is in the mid-latitudes. Its common to see an
> increase in the effect on long distance contacts since the signal
> will eventually end up near those regions. How much it effects digital mode
> throughput depends on the state of the ionosphere and the mode in use.
>
>
over the lazy dog
> the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Phil Williams
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK
t;
> PSK63F
>
> the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
> the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
> the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Phil Williams
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.co
ndwidth.
>
> 73
> Patrick
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Phil Williams
> *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Monday, January 04, 2010 11:16 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F
>
> Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31
Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31 under the same test scenarios?
Certainly, there would be more a in throughput, but that is a matter of
some liberal use of CW shorthand.
philw de ka1gmn
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Tony wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Recent path simulation tests indicate that
"Are people giving up on other stuff ?"
Let me don my Captain Obvious cape for a moment
No, it is just that there is only small of percentage that will get on
the air and call CQ in the less popular modes consistently and with the
aid of RSID in their xmissions.
If you get on the air and cal
Dial freqs:
1.838 - BPSK31, OLIVIA, JT65A
1.800 - RTTY, PSK31, OLIVIA
phil de ka1gmn
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> Phil, what frq is a good one to monitor 160 ?
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
I think that if you monitored 80 meters for 7 days, you would capture other
modes.
Any chance of monitoring 160 meters?
philw de ka1gmn
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:58 AM, obrienaj wrote:
>
>
>
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ,
> "raf3151019" wrote:
> >
> > That's quite a sophisticated s
I have the same experience with THOR and Contestia - many first time QSOs
with the aid of RSID.
I am often thanked for using RSID when calling CQ.
philw de ka1gmn
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Wes Cosand wrote:
>
>
> I am becoming persuaded that Patrick's Reed Solomon mode ID code is a rea
Interesting point about long winded macros. I have seen this this happen on
slow throughput modes like THOR4.
A first time QSO via mode like THOR4, brings a surprise to the operator when
an attempt is made use lengthy macros. The lengthy brag tape is the best as
I can microwave a frozen bagel be
"*Or maybe turn on your "Macro User Detector" (MUD), which immediately
terminates any QSO when a macro is detected. *
*Have a bitchin' 2010"
Funny.
philw de ka1gmn
*
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM, F.R. Ashley wrote:
>
>
>
> **
> *Good points by G3OBU. *
>
> *I find Macros to be quite u
Don't fear the 'old guard'. Don't let them push you around. In fact, push
back.
When it gets down to it, they're pretty harmless and really just fun to
watch.
If you got the license, you have every right to be here as these they do.
We must get beyond the technocratic caste system as it does no
"In the end, we're all just a bunch of nerds who enjoy a strange hobby"
An honest assessment.
or
"in the end, we're all a bunch of strange nerds who enjoy a hobby"
Personally, I would not have it anyway.
philw de ka1gmn
I first heard of cognitive radio systems when efforts were underway to make
use of the 'white space' in the television broadcast bands. The whole idea
is to make more efficient use the the spectrum by putting situational
awareness in to the client device.
http://www.technologyreview.com/read_arti
Yes, PSK Reporter.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Simon HB9DRV wrote:
>
>
> Also please consider http://pskreporter.info/ and
> http://pskreporter.info/pskmap.html from Philip Gladstone. I can't
> remember
> Philip's callsign.
>
> Simon Brown
> http://sdr-radio.com
>
> > -Original Message--
Here, here! Patrick.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Warren Moxley wrote:
>
>
> Patrick is the greatest! I 2nd that nomination.
>
> --- On *Sun, 12/6/09, Ian Wade G3NRW * wrote:
>
>
> From: Ian Wade G3NRW
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Nominations for 2009 Digitalradio Awards needed
> To: digi
Just installed and out on the road for a test drive...philw de ka1gmn
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Patrick Lindecker wrote:
>
>
> New release (4.16) of MULTIPSK
>
> Pour les francophones: la version française de ce message se trouve sur mon
>
> site (http://f6cte.free.fr). Il suffit de clique
Are you going to have this up and running tonight?
philw de ka1gmn
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Phil Williams wrote:
> System still up? Making another attempt.
>
> philw de ka1gmn
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
>> No probe
System still up? Making another attempt.
philw de ka1gmn
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Phil Williams wrote:
> No probem at all. Will try later.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Tony wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > Nope. Tried connecting via PAX/P
e so you did cause Multipsk to switch from PAX2 to PAX when you
> called.
>
> Thanks for trying.
>
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Phil Williams" >
> To: >
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 10:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [di
Nope. Tried connecting via PAX/PAX2 - no cigar. Condx not great tonight.
philw de ka1gmn
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Phil Williams wrote:
> thanks will try in a few.
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Tony wrote:
>
>> > 3598.0...vfo freq?
>>
>>
thanks will try in a few.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Tony wrote:
> > 3598.0...vfo freq?
>
> Phil,
>
> Yes, VFO 3598.0 USB / CF + 1000Hz.
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Phil Williams"
> To:
> Sen
3598.0...vfo freq?
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Tony wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> I have Multipsk's responder setup as an experimental pseudo mailbox on
> 3598.0 USB. The beacon is running in PAX2 mode and will accept connects in
> both PAX and PAX2 (Multipsk will switch modes automatically if you
Did you check Configure/Rig Control/Hardware PTT?
philw de ka1gmn
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Claudio wrote:
>
>
> Hi, i downloaded some hours ago FLDIGI but can´t tx. I have a yaesu ft 747
> without cat.
>
> 73
>
> Claudio-LU2VC
>
> 2009/11/26 Russell Blair
>
>>
>>
>> For my 2 bits wor
Jaak,
I agree. There are definite advantages of using DominoEX11 over of RTTY.
I am not quite sure how you get past the culture of RTTY, but I like your
suggestion of
using DominoEX11 as the secondary mode.
Maybe, one could work a station twice - once in RTTY and then again, in
DominoEX11
and e
Surfing between the spectral lines. Now that's being creative!
philw de ka1gmn
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:56 PM, KH6TY wrote:
>
>
> John,
>
> You may both be using the same tones, but are not the DSP filters sharp
> enough to preserve the received tones on both ends? If you are able to put
> yo
Yes, seen that myself.
philw de ka1gmn
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> WINMOR's busy detect works perfectly at the initiating station's end, a
> pop-up windows tells you the frequency is in use and ask if you really want
> to go ahead and transmit. I have not seen
I made an attempt to call on the 80 meter frequencies, but I need to solve
a nasty little RFI problem with a smoke alarm before going any further :-p.
philw de ka1gmn
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> I have now added 3584 and 3596 US6 to my scan for the evening.
>
> A
It would have been a great experiment if I had known what I was doing.
In typical philw fashion, I jumped head first and thrashed around, randomly
spinning knobs, flipping switches, tapping on meters, toggling the mains,
and throwing levers in a completely random fashion.
Eventually, I managed to
for a quick chat after a link is
> established. Since I do not use Multipsk for ALE 141 I am not really sure
> how AMD versus DTM or DBM is set up. ALE 400 is better for regular rag
> chews.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
>>
>>
ot permit this.
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 14074 - 141a or ALE400?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
14074 - 141a or ALE400?
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> I have modified my ALE station and during daylight hours I will be
> scanning the following channels while in the shack most of the day
> (I'll add 80M later tonight)
>
> 7074 USB
> *7102 USB
> *10145.5 USB
> 14
g for ALE.
>
> Please note that I agree with Charles, ALE does have a "lid" factor in that
> you can transmit automatically and on top of another QSO. I am advocating
> that we do this will in the shack and listening first.
>
> Andy K3UK
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov
"This is not really correct with PC-ALE and a modern receiver that has
a internal antenna tuner. I have used PC-ALE with a TS2000 and an
Icom 746 Pro and the tuner in both rigs memorizes settings for each
transmission"
How fast does the rig need to scan?
philw de ka1gmn
Ok, I am game.
I've had two QSO via ALE400 w/ the same station that's it.
I have an old FT-1000 this is supposed to have a CAT interface but never
checked it out.
If I am unable to scan, I still want to participate to at least make some
progress in realizing the potential for this mode.
I have
Welcome George!
philw de ka1gmn
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:11 AM, AC5JV,GEORGE wrote:
>
>
> HELLO my name is george , i'm 58 yrs old , disabled retired . been hamming
> since 1993 . i had my extra class ticket for 13 yrs . i have always been
> interested in the digi stuff but here late have real
n Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> That's what I am guessing...not much of an FM operator
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Doesn't the ALC behave differenty when runnning FM?
>>
&g
Doesn't the ALC behave differenty when runnning FM?
philw de ka1gmn
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm. Well I thought it would be simple enough to transmit digital
> modes on 2M FM but one issue I just ran in to is the ALC is very high
> and my usual method of lower
I have used the SDR site referenced in the video. Nice!!!
philw de ka1gmn
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, nikos_katsoulis
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,all
>
> Just take a look to
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GB9Ed02Vhr8
>
> Have a nice day.Nikos
>
>
>
What app do you use for SSTV MP73N??
philw de ka1gmn
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> That would be nice!
>
> Andy K3UK
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:53 PM, w8lew wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Good day, All.
>>
>> Don't forget: monitor SSTV frequencies and post the pictures on a web
t; You'll know the connection is made by the confirming beep of the PC speaker
>
> as well as the call sign confirmation in the RX window.
>
> ALE-400 ARQ CHAT MODE PERFORMANCE:
>
> Patrick as done a lot of work with this mode and it is quite robust. The
> fact that
E400 because they are not common to all three software packages.
>
> Andy K3UK
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> What about ALE-400? This is a mode that I have never used. I have
>> finally installed mutlip
:
>
>
> I would recommend FeldHell also.
>
> KT
> K8YZK
>
> --- On *Thu, 10/29/09, Phil Williams * wrote:
>
>
> From: Phil Williams
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New to digital modes? Try this weekend's
> challenge
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.
What? No THOR?! ;-)
philw de ka1gmn
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:31 AM, obrienaj wrote:
>
>
> We have had few new people join this group after the QST article on RS ID.
> Since many of them are NEW to digital modes other than RTTY or PSK31... I
> thought I would challenge the people who have not
1. Have fun.
2. Listen be for transmitting.
3. Goto tip#1
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:59 PM, obrienaj wrote:
>
>
> So, what would your top 3 TIPS be for someone new to digital modes be ?
>
> Andy K3UK
>
>
>
Ldigi
> not working
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Andrew...very nice work.
>>
>> philw de ka1gmn
>>
>> 2009/9/17 Andrew O'Brien
>>
>>
>>>
>>> VFO 14072.73 , 3kHZ filter/wa
Andrew...very nice work.
philw de ka1gmn
2009/9/17 Andrew O'Brien
>
>
> VFO 14072.73 , 3kHZ filter/waterfall. Vertical ground plane antenna
> Location FN02hk (Western NY state)
> RS ID "continuous"
>
> 17/9/2009
>
> 20:08:03 UTC OLIVIA-16-500 3682 Hz
> 19:25:37 UTC MFSK8 2266 Hz
> 19:23:48 UTC
All,
I just printed out all the QSL cards. I posted the proof of the card up
on the group's file archive. Check it out.
I will be mailing out the cards next weekend.
The design started out in Excel with the XYL so she could figure out how
to print them out on post card stalk. I pulled the d
What app are you running for this mode?
philw de ka1gmn kn
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, wrote:
>
>
> Anyone up for some PSK-PACKET?? 63b
>
> on 10.141.5 1650hz
> 21:00 Easttime
>
> Trip - KT4WO
>
>
>
oute the digital mode
> audio. Pangram text is used to test throughput.
>
> It's important to make sure that the audio amplitude is the same for each
> mode when testing to keep things evenly matched.
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Phil
Very interesting.
What simulator are you using?
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Tony wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> It's interesting to see how the different Olivia
> mode configurations compare when put through the HF path simulator.
>
> I ran Contestia through the simulator this even
Way to go Tony
philw de ka1gmn
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Tony wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Made my first Contestia contact with Iceland (Gisli TF3G) thanks to RSID.
> Gisli mentioned that he heard my CQ and went through several Olivia tone /
> bandwidth combinations not knowing I was runnin
Calling CQ 0025Z to 0100Z.
philw de ka1gmn
Also, would it not be beneficial to have something like this implemented in
the the unattended Pactor stations.
A physical convergence layer for all.
73
philw de ka1gmn
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM, aa777888athotmaildotcom <
aa777...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> You know what's really excitin
Link
http://f6cte.free.fr/PAPERS.ZIP
This link will point to F6CTE's (MultiPSK) web site. The ZIP file a
document titled, "RS_ID-_English.DOC", that explains in detail what Reed
Solomon Identifier(RSID) feature is.
In a nutshell, it is protocol used to identify what digital mode a
particular st
Thanks Simon.
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 18:54 +0200, Simon (HB9DRV) wrote:
>
> The DM780 DominoEX is the same as FLDIGI as the code was 'borrowed'
> from the
> fldigi sources.
>
> Off the top of my head I can't remember about FEC.
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV
> www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
>
> - Ori
I have a question for the users of DM780. Is option to enable FEC for
DominoEX? If this option is available, has anyone had any success in
the mode being detected via RSID?
73
phiw de ka1gmn
>
Yes, there had been a considerable jump in activity on the "less
traveled" digital modes. I get the same responses as you do about RSID
and it "just works".
philw de ka1gmn
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 16:37 -0400, Tony wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I've noticed a BIG jump in 'exotic mode contacts since RS
The RSID experience is still positive on this one. Most notable, is the
presence of the recent release of DRM 780 on the bands. All of my
contacts that involved mode detection via RSID has been with stations
running DM 780. The major modes this week was DominoEX, OLIVIA, and
QPSK65 - all on 39 me
we still get good print. The mode is very tolerant to
> mistuning (unlike MFSK16) and fairly resistant to multipath interference.
>
> 73
>
> Skip KH6TY
>
>
> Phil Williams wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone out there who is active in using digital modes on 2
> > meters?
&g
Is there anyone out there who is active in using digital modes on 2 meters?
I would be especially interested in experiences with digital modes such as MFSK
and DominoEX.
There has been a number of presentations on this particular aspect of the hobby
and it would be interesting to know how wh
My experience with RSID over the past 24 hours has been very positive.
I see many more stations using RSID and would assume this has much to do
with the recent release of DRM 780. I take it that RSID is enabled by
default. Please correct me if am wrong on this as I don't run DRM 780.
I have mad
Kurt brings up a good point. It would seem the this subject would require
wide dissemination.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Traveler wrote:
>
>
>
> Problem is QST is limited in the number of subscriber vs number of hams who
> enjoy the digital modes. I myself am not a member of the ARRL so I
My experience with RSID
I got on 30 meters, enabled the RSID feature in Fldigi, and called CQ. I
used Olivia with a non-standard setting of 4/250.
I was answered by K1DED in NH. He stated that he was running HRD V5.0 and
had enabled RSID. HRD detected my RSID and simply asked him if he wan
I agree with Andy's recommendation. Also, might I suggest a sharing of
experiences with using RS ID with the group to share knowledge and build
confidence. Anyone wishing to experiment with modes using RSID, please drop
me a line.
philw de ka1gmn
Skip makes a good point. Passband tuning and IF shift are effective in
dealing with AGC capture.
In some cases I have added attenuation in to the receiver as an additional
measure to reduce front-end overload.
philw de ka1gmn
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:27 AM, kh6ty wrote:
>
>
> Frank, often the
Starting at 0030z, I will be making AMTOR calls between 10.137 - 10.138 MHz +/-
QRM. QSOs and reception reports are welcome.
phil de ka1gmn
I guess a better way to put it would be 10.141 MHz USB.
PhilW de KA1GMN
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I will be on 30 meters PS
All,
I will be on 30 meters PSK31 @ 10.140 + 1000Hz from to 0100z.
PhilW de KA1GMN
Listening on 10.140 + 1000Hz for the next few hours.
PhilW de KA1GMN
PhilW, KA1GMN
I rarely engage in commentary about the hobby. I think it the time and energy
expended. to debates issues concerning the amateur is better applied to being
on the air and promoting good will. This course of action is my choice. I
respect and support to the right for any amateur to voice his or
164900 4 -22 5.1 -199 1 * CQ DK7OM JO53 1 0
Considering that I am using an inverted V whose apex is only 25 feet off the
ground and that it is oriented to the North and South - I think this is very
impressive.
PhilW de KA1GMN
Euless, TX
PhilW, KA1GMN
Got you logged. I'm located in Euless, Texas...just southwest of Dallas.
PhilW de KA1GMN
143500 0 -9 1.8 -670 3
143500 1 2/4CQ WD4GBW FM171 0
143600 1 -13 10.0 -657 4 * WD4KPD N4WO EL88 1 0
143
David,
Copied you on jt65a. Sorry not for posting the logs, but I will post you again
if I see you. I'm new to this mode. Receive only for now. You signal sound
ok.
PhilW de KA1GMN
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i know some of yo
Calling CQ and listening on 14077.0. Starting mode: Olivia 16-500.
PhilW de KA1GMN
Andrew O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Good
idea Bonnie.
On 4/13/07, expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Andy,
Suggestion:
Hey Patricia,
I'm over in Texas. Will give it a try if you are still on.
Phil De KA1GMN
"Patricia (Elaine) Gibbons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm operating Olivia mode on 30 meters at the moment (0308GMT) ...
If anyone cares to make a QSO, I'd like to
Thanks Rick. You answered my own question. I agree with you that considering
we are dealing with a multi-access media - it should be mandatory that an
automatic station run some type of agreed upon media access control. It would
be to everyone's benefit.
Phil Williams, KA1GMN
93 matches
Mail list logo
