>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of John B. Stephensen
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 4:29 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of k4cjx
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 2:12 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
Amazing that o
I suggested this to Rick a few months ago; he thought it worthy of
consideration.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: Victor Poor [mailto:vp...@att.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:02 PM
To: 'Dave AA6YQ'; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; win...@yahoo
Will there be a session on retrofitting WINMOR's excellent busy frequency
detector into Winlink PMBOs?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Rick Muething
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 20
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Hal
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:10 PM
To: DigitalRadio
Subject: [digitalradio] sound card manager software
To The Group:
The "sound card ma
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of IMR
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 6:04 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Direct RTTY Generation
>In your MMTTY
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of IMR
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:09 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Direct RTTY Generation
OK Tnx...
found the
>>>AA6YQ comments below.
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of AC TALBOT
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 5:46 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Direct RTTY Generation
A back-to-basics
Thanks, Laurie.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Laurie, VK3AMA
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 3:08 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8
Has anyone checked to see whether the ROS code contains a keylogger, trojans,
or a rootkit?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 7:37 PM
To
busy frequency detector
is as offensive as an unattended station running a wide mode without an
effective busy frequency detector; neither belongs on the amateur bands.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
ys is completely irrelevant.
The nasty name-calling that appears below and in previous posts today is
flat-out unacceptable. Were I moderator of this group, the offending parties
would be long gone.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroup
renewal, and found that it had been issued on 7/13; a hardcopy arrived by
postal mail yesterday afternoon.
I don't see how this process could be any simpler...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Beha
out
themselves"; this isn't one of them.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of W2XJ
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:35 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Alan Barrow
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 1:22 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Random data vs Spread Spectrum
graham787 wrote:
>
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 4:31 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your P
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of "John Becker, WOJAB"
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:01 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data
any understanding of the social aspects of amateur radio.
Hopefully, some wise Elmer will take Jose in hand and help him grow up to more
constructively apply his obvious technical talent.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
+++ More AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor
>>&
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:07 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor
Dave,
I re
ated here a few months ago that he would
investigate
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 9:25 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalrad
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of g4ilo
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:47 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Individual software programs for variou
http://www.dxlabsuite.com/winwarbler/Heard.jpg
Entries can be sorted by clicking a column header (like a spreadsheet).
- Add a column to indicate mode.
- Provide filtering by mode (e.g. "only show Olivia and Contestia entries")
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of David Little
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:35 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Opposing 60M proposal
Yo
>>>AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "David Little" wrote:
This would be a good plan to insure that the Amateur Radio Service is treated
as hobby-only communications.
>>>"We had to destroy the village in order to save it"
>snip
Where does one file comments on this proposal?
I sure wish the WinLink guys would backfit the WinMor busy frequency detector
and deploy it to every PMBO. I'd much rather write code than letters to the
FCC...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of "John Becker, WOJAB"
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 12:50 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL c
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Rick Muething
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 7:11 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: 'Vic Poor'
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Una
Thanks, Rick.
I have suggested in the past that your SCAMP/WINMOR "channel busy detector"
could be inexpensively back-fit into WinLink PMBOs. Has anyone taken a look
at this?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: Jaak Hohensee [mailto:jaak.hohen...@eesti.ee]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:50 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Dave AA6YQ
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Unattended narrow mode transmission "protection"
Busy d
it with you.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Simon HB9DRV
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:30 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Unattended narrow mode tra
automatic stations without busy detection by giving them
dedicated sub-bands would send a very clear message: the way to obtain
dedicated frequencies is to unrelentingly drive everyone else out of them.
Appeasement never works.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From
>>>8P9RY comments below
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Trevor .
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:21 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SS definitions
--- On Wed, 10/3/10, KH6TY mailto:kh6ty%40comcast.n
radio%40yahoogroups.com>
, "Dave AA6YQ" wrote:
>
> The advantage of using FSK is that one can take advantage of the excellent
> RTTY filters built into some transceivers. These filters are generally not
> available when operating in USB/LSB. This is particularly important to
>
The advantage of using FSK is that one can take advantage of the excellent
RTTY filters built into some transceivers. These filters are generally not
available when operating in USB/LSB. This is particularly important to
contesters operating in a crowded environment and DXers dealing with weak
sign
EPC runs a PSK63 contest, and the mode works quite well. Panoramic reception
and broadband decoding are a potent combination.
It's the only contest I've ever entered, and I took first place in NA, hi.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoo
r cause someone else to think in an entirely new
way.
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
From: Dave AA6YQ
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] 1976 FCC - Delete all Emission Types from Part 97
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 9:58 AM
(unless the “Universal QRL signa
(unless the “Universal QRL signal” is something simple like “QRL” in CW, or
3-seconds of carrier at ~1 khz.)
73,
Dave, 8P9RY
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:55 AM
To
Unless you can convince the transceiver manufacturers to include the capability
in each unit, someone operating without a computer connected to his transceiver
– e.g. a phone operator -- will be unable to generate the “universal QRL”
signal.
73,
Dave, 8P9RY
From: digitalra
>>>AA6YQ comments below
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 5:50 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL/FCC Announcement about ROS
Hi Dave
random sequence) isn't spread spectrum.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rein A
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 3:16 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] What is SS?
Hello All,
>>>AA6YQ comments below
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of J. Moen
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 10:11 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Statement on Withdrawal of Support for ROS
(K3UK S
Rein, why don’t you call Dawn (FCC agent 3820) and ask her why the FCC chose to
communicate through the ARRL; the phone number has been posted in previous
messages here, but I’ll dig it back up if needed.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>>>AA6YQ comments below.
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Ackrill
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 3:14 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FCC on "ROS" post on ARRL website!
Dave AA
trum, then ROS could be used on HF by US operators. However the source of
this proof would have to come from someone other than the ROS developer, who
now has no credibility with the FCC whatsoever.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
words publicly twisted into "ROS is legal on HF", though.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of J. Moen
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:04 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subje
the message below.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
On Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 4:08 PM
To: rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com Subject:
RE: [ROSDIGITALMODEMGROUP] Experimentation and Amateur Radio
1. The author publicly
ted to ROS posted on <http://www.arrl.org/> as of
a few minutes ago.
Note that all telephone conversations with FCC personnel are recorded.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
my pleasure, Rick.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Rick Westerfield
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 9:11 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Calculating CPU use
otherboard that supports a 3 GB SATA interface, and choose hard drives that
exploit this interface. Again, you can save some money up front by starting
with your current PC's hard drive in your new system, and upgrade later.
All DXLab applications run correctly under 64-bit XP, Vista, and Window
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Alan Barrow
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:57 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: PSK SPOTS in DXLAB
obrie
You were right, Skip.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Andy obrien
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:53 AM
To: 30...@yahoogroups.com; digitalradio
Subject: [digitalradio] BREAKING NEWS
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Andy obrien
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:56 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] PSK SPOTS
That is a good point, Alan. N
m.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 8:30 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Curious sound card modes question -
It will be sprea
emote station's receiver).
Participants in the ongoing QSO have no way convey "QRL" to the automatic
station.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of John B. Stephensen
Sent: Monday, Fe
The amendment you cite below was part of a desperate, last-minute attempt to
salvage RM-11306. A month after filing this amendment, the ARRL retracted
RM-11306 in its entirely.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of John B. Stephensen
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 6:14 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] A closer look at ROS]]
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:30 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-
redibly valuable can survive this.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Andy obrien
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:24 PM
To: digitalradio; alera...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Future of ALE and HF
ction against "broken" start and stop bits within that
sequence? Brian K6STI referred to his decoding technique as employing a
"flywheel", which I interpreted as a means of adjusting the synchronous
timing with high-quality start bits decoded within the sequence.
73,
Thanks Wes.
WinWarbler uses MMTTY as its RTTY engine; thus MMTTY can be configured to
achieve the same performance as that shown for WinWarbler.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Wes Cosand
Sent
There have been several reports on the DXLab reflector that Club Log ignores
the DXCC entity uploaded with each QSO, attempts to determine the DXCC
entity itself from its database, and sometimes gets it wrong.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio
Patrick, F6CTE.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Andy obrien
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 11:11 AM
To: digitalradio
Subject: [digitalradio] Nominations for 2009 Digitalradio Awards
###AA6YQ responses below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Alan Barrow
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:34 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digital busy detect
Dave AA6YQ wrote
+++ AA6YQ responses below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Alan Barrow
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:12 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digital busy detect
Dave AA6YQ wrote
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of expeditionradio
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 4:29 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Contesters and DXers should
To be clear, an attended station need not wait for 5 minutes of clear
frequency before transmitting; 30 seconds of no signals (meaning no
automatic station is QRV) followed by a "QRL?" sent "in mode" with no
response should be sufficient.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-
+++ AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Alan Barrow
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 10:30 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digital busy detect
Dave AA6YQ wrote
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of WD8ARZ
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 10:06 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digital busy detect
Scamp busy detector
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Alan Barrow
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:57 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digital busy detect- it's no
can't be
designed, can't be implemented, can't be deployed, won't work, causes warts,
causes cancer, causes global warming, or will cause the universe to expand
forever. Few are fooled by this.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@y
+++ AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Brabham" wrote:
If WinMore was in the public domain, you might have a point there. When the
WinLink group deep-sixes their proprietary software, then who can use it?
>>>We are discussing what is and is
frequency detectors. Once Winlink and other unattended
automatic stations reduce their QRM rate to something approaching that of
the average human operator, the anger will dissipate and the QRMing of
automatic stations will dissappear.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
F
mor's busy
frequency detector is a descendent of Scamp's, as both were developed by
Rick KN6KB. Hold your nose if you must, but I suggest that you evaluate
Winmor's busy frequency detector before making additional claims about what
is and is not possible.
73,
Dave, AA6Y
really believe that your approach merits the assignment of amateur
frequencies for your exclusive use, then go convince the FCC and IARU to
allocate them. In the mean time, kindly refrain from QRMing ongoing QSOs when
you operate on frequencies that we all share.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
---
Did you evaluate the busy frequency detector in Scamp, Charles?
Have you evaluated the busy frequency detector in Winmor?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Charles Brabham
Sent: Monday
which they are
operating.
No DXer should participate in a pileup if doing so would QRM an ongoing QSO.
In my experience, politely asking the participants in the ongoing QSO to
move almost always yields a polite and positive response.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
Fro
omatic, but its only unattended if its operating while you
aren't in control.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien wrote:
>
> > When there's no emergency underway, however, the "automatic bands" are
> > available to all
tended stations. Its no more
acceptable for unattended stations to QRM ongoing QSOs in the "automatic bands"
than it is to QRM them anywhere else within the amateur spectrum.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
wrote:
>
>
can more likely be heard by the DX. This is particularly true in
digital mode pileups.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
wrote:
>
> > Skip KH6TY wrote:
> > A contester who calls CQ Contest is usually doing
> >
in all of
the useful radio spectrum, a progression that began with Marconi in the early
1900's:
<http://www.arraycomm.com/serve.php?page=Cooper>
Martin Cooper was the lead engineer of the Motorola team that developed the
handheld mobile phone.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
, in my
opinion.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of John B. Stephensen
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 11:47 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Why would anyone
authorized.
With a bandwidth of more than 500 hz, such stations are limited to the
sub-bands enumerated in §97.221(b).
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of John B. Stephensen
Sent: Friday
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of John B. Stephensen
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 2:43 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Why would anyone
The FCC could ma
ation forecasts
using the VOACAP or ICEPAC engines; you can use the beacon network to
calibrate these forecasts."
Automatically calibrating propagation forecasts based on actual beacon
signal strength is not yet available...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message
bler/Heard.jpg>
This approach depends on stations being QRV, which is not always the case
when a band opening is underway.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Gmail - Kevin, Natali
1. don't be afraid to ask for help
2. listen to a couple of QSOs in a mode before attempting to make your first
one
3. if you must worry, worry about signal quality, not signal strength
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digi
ption)
4. QRZ CDROM
5. QRZ.com subscription
6. QRZ.com via Pathfinder (free with advertisements)
Patrick, let me know if you'd like to pursue this.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf
-- unless there's a contest in progress or just ending, in which case
its best to wait a full day. The second operation is initiated whenever you
want to check for new confirmations.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalr
The $250 Asus price quoted below is incorrect; they're available new for
$310.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalmo...@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalmo...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 8:43 PM
To: digi
olution of 1024x576, and an Asus Eee PC
900HA ($250) offers a screen resolution of 1024 x 600. These units display
20+% more pixels than the 800x600 SVGA monitors still in use on desktops in
the amateur community.
1024x768 was a standard laptop resolution not that long ago...
73,
D
,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of damienjorgensen
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 8:51 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Zapped PCs, data recovery, and Windows !
In that
s.
I used to buy Dells, but I've been assembling my own PCs for the past couple
of years. Thus I don't use OEM Windows licenses.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of frankk2ncc
Sen
terrible UI and many defects), I
switched to StorageCraft after seeing some very positive reviews -- and have
been quite happy with it.
I have no relationship with any of the companies mentioned above, but do
have lots of friends in the mass storage business...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
happens to be
in the middle of write operation when the power fails. APC makes a nice
product, but be sure to not buy one larger than is needed for ~5 minutes of
operation.
I have no relationship with any of the companies mentioned above...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message
You don't know if an instantaneously "empty" spot on the waterfall is truly
empty until you send "QRL?" and receive no response, or monitor it long
enough to have heard both sides of a QSO if one were in progress.
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: dig
"check the box" filters for band, mode, LotW participation, etc. to SQL
queries, including date ranges).
SpotCollector is free, and available via www.dxlabsuite.com
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogro
If WinWarbler repeatedly decodes the same callsign on multiple frequencies,
it compares signal strengths to identify the primary and suppresses the
harmonics.
Harmonics can be caused by stations generating PSK with modulated audio
below 1500 Hz.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original
Thanks, Sholto, I'm aware of the results Alex has published and the tools he
makes available. There are significant opportunities for improvement.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Sholto Fisher
I have the source code to MMTTY, have updated MMTTY to enable operation
under Vista (version 1.66G), and intend to improve its RTTY decoding
capability.
MMTTY can transmit via AFSK or FSK; as far as I know, MMVARI is limited to
AFSK.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
