On 08/13/2010 07:08 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
WE9XLQ us not a valid USA callsign
It may not be a ham callsign, but it is a valid callsign...
EXPERIMENTAL SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORIZATION
CLASS of Station XD FX
EMISSION Designator SK25J2D
Experition 3:00 AM EST Jan 31 2011.
Call Sign WE9XLQ
--
Hello All,
Mr. Ros has just corrected the statement on the official ROS Modem
Website regarding ROS use in USA:
The FCC allows ROS to be used in the USA
13 August, 2010 by José Alberto Nieto Ros
â The FCC allows ROS to be used in the USAâ
only by WE9XLQ
Making up for lost ground
WE9XLQ us not a valid USA callsign
Andy
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
What ?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Rein A rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Hello All,
Mr. Ros has just corrected the statement on the official ROS Modem
Website regarding
OK, Thanks for your answer :)
LA5VNA Steinar
On 03.08.2010 07:06, Tony wrote:
Steinar,
I've been monitoring ROS on-the-air and I've done some testing with the
HF path simulator. In my opinion, it's about as good as one would expect
from an MFSK mode with a relatively slow baud rate.
On 8/1/2010 7:31 AM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi Tony
Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty ,
olivia etc?
Yes I have Steinar
Tony -K2MO
a5vna Steinar
On 20.07.2010 03:42, Tony wrote:
All,
With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought it
OK, is it public ? I can't find anything on digitalradio yahoogroup
LA5VNA Steinar
On 02.08.2010 12:58, Tony wrote:
On 8/1/2010 7:31 AM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi Tony
Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty ,
olivia etc?
Yes I have Steinar
Tony -K2MO
Steinar,
I've been monitoring ROS on-the-air and I've done some testing with the
HF path simulator. In my opinion, it's about as good as one would expect
from an MFSK mode with a relatively slow baud rate. Tests show that it
will outperform RTTY and PSK31 in poor channel conditions (most MFSK
Hi Tony
Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty ,
olivia etc?
la5vna Steinar
On 20.07.2010 03:42, Tony wrote:
All,
With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought it would
be interesting to see how the narrow mode compared to the wide version
Yes Dave,
Apart from my test PC virus/malware protection, whenever there is a
change in an executable or dll I run them through an online scanner
(20MB file limit) here http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/
It runs the submitted file through 19 different scanners, with the
occasional
@rein
Function can be switched off (now) .. So why worry about?
But all user have to switch it off cause after installing it is set to on .
Greetz
Sigi
Dg9bfc
Thanks, Laurie.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Laurie, VK3AMA
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 3:08 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8
Laurie,
Then why don't they filter it at the cluster?
Makes more sence, if you ask me.
Cheerio! Kr. Bonne.
Op 25-07-10 04:01, Laurie, VK3AMA schreef:
Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users
contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster.
de
Hi Laurie
Great link! Thanks :)
La5vna Steinar
On 25.07.2010 09:07, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
Yes Dave,
Apart from my test PC virus/malware protection, whenever there is a
change in an executable or dll I run them through an online scanner
(20MB file limit) here
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien
siegfried.jackst...@... wrote:
So every user should switch that off and spot only by hand
The programmer shouldn't use clusters to promote his software! That's the whole
point. Jose Nieto-Ros intentionally misuses propagation tools
A safety pin on a gun, doesn't make the gun less destructive Sigi...
Right but prevents loosing a shot by accident while the gun is in your
pocket
There are still users that do not know what is the soft doing in the
background as not all users read the news (this group and others)
If
Autospot can now be turned off with a switch
Spotting by hand is possible
So jose did some major changes in that way
Now we have 2 programms running in background of the soft ros
One sends spots to cluster via telnet
And the other sends spots to psk reporter page for display them on a map
Hi Siegfried
I can't find this switch, where is it hiding?
LA5VNA Steinar
On 24.07.2010 10:03, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
Autospot can now be turned off with a switch
Spotting by hand is possible
So jose did some major changes in that way
Now we have 2 programms running in
Iin the tab skets click on cluster
There you can send spots manually and switch off the autospotting
I let the newest version run for a few hours not autospots were sent
when switch was off
You can send autogenerated and in downloaded newest version the switch is
set normally to on . so as the
Aha, this switch was not implemented in the version 4.8.2 that I was
testing.
la5vna Steinar
On 24.07.2010 16:23, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
Iin the tab skets click on cluster
There you can send spots manually and switch off the autospotting
I let the newest version run for a few hours
Glad i could help
Iif you do NOT use cat the autogenerated spots on 20m are sent as 14000 . so
not correct
But when sending by hand qrg is correct
I asked jose if he can solve that . that a user without can do not send
wrong qrg . maybe he will find a solution for that
As we have now the
Hi Sigi,
Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User.
Jose, clearly doesn't understand the Ham/Cluster culture.
Maybe we can change his attitude by passing on these concerns to his
Beta-Tester
PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Hi Sigi,
Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User.
Jose, clearly doesn't understand
Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User.
To me, this attempted deception has been obvious ever since the issue of
any auto-spots came up.
Isn't there any honesty at all possible with this
Under the Skeds menu, then Cluster
de Laurie, VK3AMA
On 24/07/2010 7:26 PM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi Siegfried
I can't find this switch, where is it hiding?
LA5VNA Steinar
On 24.07.2010 10:03, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
Autospot can now be turned off with a switch
Spotting by
] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster
User.
To me, this attempted deception has been obvious ever since the issue of
any auto-spots came up.
Isn't
Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users
contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster.
de Laurie, VK3AMA
On 25/07/2010 11:28 AM, F.R. Ashley wrote:
After reading endless posts about this software, I sincerely wonder why in
heck anyone is even using
Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users
contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster.
de Laurie, VK3AMA
On 25/07/2010 11:28 AM, F.R. Ashley wrote:
After reading endless posts about this software, I sincerely wonder why in
heck anyone is even using
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User.
To me, this attempted deception has been obvious
Hi all,
It seems that the latest ROS is not spamming the cluster.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Hi Steinar,
Unfortunately, v4.8.x of ROS still spams the DX Cluster with auto-spots.
Only way to effectively stop is block adif.exe at the firewall.
ROS Auto-Spots too Cluster currently represent 98% of all ROS Cluster
spots, with ROS representing 6.2% of all Cluster spots (7 day period).
As
Thanks for the testing Tony. We observe Doppler shifts of as much as 100
Hz and Doppler spreads around 50 Hz or greater. On SSB phone, a S3
signal will not be intelligible and you can hear the voice pitch go down
in a fluttering manner. ROS definitely produces nothing but garbage when
SSB
Tony,
Our on-air tests show that ROS 16 baud, 2200 Hz wide spread spectrum was
very poor on UHF under Doppler spreading. Can you confirm this with
flutter tests like Jaak has done on
http://contestia.blogspot.com/p/pathsim_09.html ?
73, Skip KH6TY
On 7/19/2010 9:42 PM, Tony wrote:
All,
On 7/20/2010 3:54 PM, KH6TY wrote:
Our on-air tests show that ROS 16 baud, 2200 Hz wide spread spectrum
was very poor on UHF under Doppler spreading. Can you confirm this with
flutter tests like Jaak has done.
Skip,
My path tests show that ROS is less tolerant to Doppler spread than
Olivia
All,
With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought it would
be interesting to see how the narrow mode compared to the wide version
under the controlled environment of the HF path simulator. After a few
hours of testing, it seems there's little difference between the two.
The
-
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@...
To: * Digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; *
ROSDIGITALMODEMGROU
rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS Returns
ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out..
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
S
: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
To: * Digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; *
ROSDIGITALMODEMGROU
rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS Returns
ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out..
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
S
Hi Siegfried
Do you get the sandboxie software working ?
la5vna Steinar
On 15.07.2010 20:59, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
Bigger ? yes . making MORE trouble hi hi
Better? No . as the mode is not changed and the frontend is also not changed
The only change is that now you can not use it
Hello steinar
Did not have the time yet to try
I use the old 1.0 with a firewall
That works okay
Did you try the newer versions with sandbox???
Greetz
Sigi
Not the latest , but I will ;)
la5vna Steinar
On 15.07.2010 21:29, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
Hello steinar
Did not have the time yet to try
I use the old 1.0 with a firewall
That works okay
Did you try the newer versions with sandbox???
Greetz
Sigi
I had new vers 4.7 running here overnight without stoppages.
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Sent: Jul 15, 2010 3:29 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS back bigger and better !
Hello steinar
It would appear that what is does best is the continued mutilation of horse
corpses.
de Curt KC8STE/AAR5VR
73
--- On Wed, 7/14/10, J. Moen j...@jwmoen.com wrote:
From: J. Moen j...@jwmoen.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS back bigger and better !
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date
ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out..
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
S
saa...@broadpark.no
To: * Digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; * ROSDIGITALMODEMGROU
rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS Returns
ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out..
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
S
...@yahoogroups.comROSDIGITALMODEMGROUP%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS Returns
ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out..
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
S
http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
Chat
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS back bigger and better !
Spain kicks another goal !!!
v4.7.0 Beta
By suggestion of CO2DC and The man of the Vara I will continue to
develop ROS.
A new Sked page have been linked to ROS software.
http://www.ham2ham.com/room307_ros.php
Peter
Google to learn that expression.
-Original Message-
From: James Hall hall.jam...@gmail.com hall.jamesr%40gmail.com
Sent: Jul 8, 2010 4:00 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
Looks like
://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosmodemusa/
Not very popular just 18 subscribers ( almost 4000 here )
73 Rein W6SZ
http://www.nitehawk.com/rasmit/
-Original Message-
From: James Hall hall.jam...@gmail.com
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 11:09 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS
CLOSING GROUP TOMORROW EVE.
IF YOU NEED TO COPY ANYTHING, GET ER DONE !
DAVID/WD4KPD
from his website
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/07/10/ros-and-cluster/
Jose says...
ROS uses a system that send reports to the DX Cluster automatically.
This is useful to know who are listen you and the system is done so as not
to saturate the cluster (only send some spot).
If you
Just goes to show that he reads the boards and keeps track of what is going
on.
Now, how easy would it be to program a button to disable the function with
one toggle in the software? Very easy! Then he could open it to everyone
to decide whether they want the reporting or not. Since he won't
With this action (or inaction) from Mr ROS and considering all of his
past actions/comments it becomes clear (to me) that he has an agenda and
Hams are being used as beta-testers to help fulfil his ultimate goal.
He has shown several times an unwillingness to embrace Ham Spirit and
Ham
Just added adif exe to my firewall
No data in no data out
Can use ros now as I have no inet access
Jose does monitor eu traffic via twente . so does the soft send (hidden)
data on the air??? I do not know . but I do not matter about cause I have
absolutely no passwords (except the gmail
Looks like this is a DX Cluster server available on the Internet running a
software package called DXSpider.
http://wiki.dxcluster.org/index.php/Main_Page Doesn't seem to be nefarious
at all to me. Telnet in, give your callsign and it'll start giving you info.
I have no clue how to read this but
: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
Looks like this is a DX Cluster server available on the Internet running a
software package called DXSpider.
http://wiki.dxcluster.org/index.php/Main_Page Doesn't seem to be nefarious
at all to me. Telnet in, give your callsign and it'll start giving you info
At 08:58 AM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
extremely wicked; nefarious schemes; a villainous plot; a villainous
band of thieves
Rein are you trying to tell us that NONE of this never happened ?
The list of banned, and other thing that have been posted that this
program has been said to do.
This
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
At 08:58 AM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
extremely wicked; nefarious schemes; a villainous plot; a villainous
band of thieves
Rein are you trying to tell us that NONE of this never happened ?
The list of banned, and other thing that have been
Sorry Rein -
Please forgive as that was about the time I was having big time
computer problems. Lost a bunch of emails.
what was that my final question again.
John, W0JAB
-
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 1:14 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
Sorry Rein -
Please forgive as that was about the time I was having big time
computer problems. Lost a bunch of emails.
what
/
-Original Message-
From: rein...@ix.netcom.com [mailto:rein...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:43 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
OK John.
Understood.
Did it work on your computer?
Did it work
After loading a updated version as he said that everyone
needed to do. After entering my call it would not work.
Just like others have posted that they could no longer use it.
I have not tried it again and will not try it.
Touch a hot stove and get burned one will not touch it again.
I will
I think many would like to have a answer once and for all
on this issue if some have been banned from using the
software.
John, W0JAB
digitalradio co moderator
At 12:54 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
Could this ROS discussion be taken offline or elsewhere?
I expect others, like I, are sick of the
: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
I think many would like to have a answer once and for all
on this issue if some have been banned from using the
software.
John, W0JAB
digitalradio co moderator
At 12:54 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
Could this ROS discussion be taken offline
-river.net
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 2:18 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
I think many would like to have a answer once and for all
on this issue if some have been banned from using the
software.
John, W0JAB
digitalradio co moderator
At 12:54
At 01:44 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
John,
Who is Andy, K3UK?
Andy is the list owner.
And yes anyone can discuss ROS at any point and time.
And many are still looking for an answer of why
some (at one point or another) was banned from using
the program.
Now you seem to be a spokesperson for
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:59 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
John,
Why not give it a serious try? It's is worth getting to the bottom of this
or perhaps
The discussion of the persona-non-grata list was started here:
http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=239742highlight=ros. It starts
getting pretty interesting around page 4 or 5.
In March, the list consisted of the following calls: *
to be involved. Please let me just play. I am tired, don't bother me
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 2:18 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
I think many would
AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of John Becker, WOJAB
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:01 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
And many
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:47:51PM -0700, Jeff Moore wrote:
As for the 3000 people that are being quiet on this list, how much of
that is that they don't want to be singled out by a psychotic non-ham
software author for inclusion in his list??
This is my first -- and, I hope, my last -- post
issues related to digital modes? A digital mode with a list of
banned calls?
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Dave AA6YQ aa...@ambersoft.com
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 3:52 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
AA6YQ comments below
: mikea mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 4:11 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:47:51PM -0700, Jeff Moore wrote:
As for the 3000 people that are being quiet on this list, how much of
that is that they don't
Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 3:47 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
Given the author's animosity toward certain hams, the fact that he stated he
was doing a persona non
AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 4:31 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
Hi
-Original Message-
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 3:01 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
At 01:44 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
John,
Who is Andy, K3UK?
Andy is the list owner.
And yes
AA6YQ aa...@ambersoft.com
Sent: Jul 9, 2010 5:16 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of rein
Hi Rain
You have absolutely right . ROS are sending data from your PC to the
cluster. Try to type the IP address 90.225.73.203:8000 into your
browser and you get this:
login: GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: 90.225.73.203:8000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nb-NO; rv:1.9.2.6)
W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jul 8, 2010 3:28 PM
To: * Digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
Hi Rain
You have absolutely right . ROS are sending data from your PC to the
cluster. Try
At 02:28 PM 7/8/2010, you wrote:
Hi Rain
You have absolutely right . ROS are sending data from your PC to the
cluster. Try to type the IP address 90.225.73.203:8000 into your
browser and you get this:
Why would it telnet to an IP address in Sweden?
...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jul 8, 2010 4:25 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
Yes , that is what is seems to me Rein.
Let me try to explain the in my Norwegian English.
Lest assume you are on mister ROS's hate list, but what to test the
software i
: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jul 8, 2010 4:25 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
Yes , that is what is seems to me Rein.
Let me try to explain the in my Norwegian English.
Lest assume you are on mister ROS's hate list
I finally installed ROS and it triggered my firewall trying to connect
to 109.72.112.37 port 7300.
I did a Telnet, it is Cluster Node US6IQ-1
Today I again started ROS and this time the firewall triggered on ROS
connecting to 82.182.70.198 port 8000, which is Cluster Node SM6YOU-2
I have
What freq is the ROS mode being used on 40 Meters?
World like to play with it a bit.
John
If you download and installed the newest version you will find the qrg in
the software
You CAN use it with rig control and set the right qrg via serial port . but
you can also use a rig without cat and tune in by hand
The qrg of ALL bands can be found in the soft in the frequency tab
Dg9bfc
If I download a new version I will NOT be able to use
the program. For a unknown reason I was one of the people
that Jose has seen unfit to use it.
That was the reason I had to beg for a earlier venison of it.
But thanks for your reply.
At 03:50 PM 7/5/2010, you wrote:
If you download
: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:43 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS on 40 meters
What freq is the ROS mode being used on 40 Meters?
World like to play with it a bit.
John
7.053 to 7.056.
phil
n4zsa
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:43 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS on 40 meters
What freq is the ROS mode being used on 40 Meters?
World like to play with it a bit
And cause QRM in the beacon subband...
So much for the Gentlemen's Agreement!
Wes W1LIC
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 7:42:58 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS 10 meters
FYI
Changes
On 06/02/2010 12:15 PM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
let's forget about this Mr. Ros without manners and his new a Yahoo list.
There is a lot of decent programmers out there, making excellent HAM
software. Mr. Ros is not worth the attention he and he's
frequency-hopping spread spectrum software
Rein
Really don't know what to say at this point.
Still trying to understand why my call was added to
the list of calls not able to use the ROS program.
But since Jose will not say I'll just move on to things
other then ROS. But I'm not the only one that this
has happen to. No big deal I have
: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
Rein
Really don't know what to say at this point.
Still trying to understand why my call was added to
the list of calls not able to use the ROS program.
But since Jose will not say I'll just move on to things
other then ROS. But I'm not the only one
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
Rein
Don't take it personal.
For some reason even I got on his bad list.
I did ask but never got an answer.
Not sure but I think someone has been feeding bad info to him.
Think he was told that I has said something that I really
Dear Steinar,
Very true.
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jun 2, 2010 4:15 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
Hi Rein
let's forget about this Mr. Ros without manners and his new
No need to worry from being banned from this list from me.
That's not my style of moderating.
Yes I can no longer use ROS for some reason.
I did ask but that went unanswered.
All I know is that he posted a updated version and when ask for my call
the program would shut down if I recall. Never
- Original Message -
But since I have it on a flash drive I did install it on the laptop and
gave it a call other then my call and it worked fine.
What do you think?
I think even Ray Charles could see that.
Jose, if I'm wrong in any way - feel free to
jump in here and make any
I think that is what I said below now in RED
By my call I mean W0JAB
At 12:44 PM 6/2/2010, you wrote:
- Original Message -
But since I have it on a flash drive I did install it on the laptop and
gave it a call other then my call and it worked fine.
What do you think?
I think
, WØJAB
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
I think that is what I said below now in RED
By my call I mean W0JAB
At 12:44 PM 6/2/2010, you wrote:
- Original Message
/decode it under all
circumstances
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sparks dspa...@pobox.com
Sent: Jun 2, 2010 2:14 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
Oops, I missed that.
What I *THOUGHT* you were saying is that you tried
Spread Spectrum.
--
Dave - AF6AS
--
From: rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:01 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
Hello Dave, AF6AS,
IIRC what does it stand for?
There has
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
IIRC = if I remember correctly.
The documentation issue stemmed from someone who complained that PACTOR, and
maybe other digital modes, could be considered codes or cyphers, and the
FCC ruled that they weren't because they were
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
Hello Dave, AF6AS,
IIRC what does it stand for?
There has to be enough information to at least reverse-engineer a mode by
the FCC (and the NSA).
Is that documented somewhere, not that I want to question
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
