On 08/13/2010 07:08 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
> WE9XLQ us not a valid USA callsign
It may not be a ham callsign, but it is a valid callsign...
"EXPERIMENTAL SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORIZATION"
CLASS of Station XD FX
EMISSION Designator SK25J2D
Experition 3:00 AM EST Jan 31 2011.
Call Sign WE9XLQ
WE9XLQ us not a valid USA callsign
Andy
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
> What ?
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Rein A wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Mr. Ros has just corrected the statement on the official ROS Modem
>> Website regarding ROS use in USA:
>>
>
What ?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Rein A wrote:
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> Mr. Ros has just corrected the statement on the official ROS Modem
> Website regarding ROS use in USA:
>
> The FCC allows ROS to be used in the USA
> 13 August, 2010 by José Alberto Nieto Ros
>
> †The FCC allows ROS
Hello All,
Mr. Ros has just corrected the statement on the official ROS Modem
Website regarding ROS use in USA:
The FCC allows ROS to be used in the USA
13 August, 2010 by José Alberto Nieto Ros
â The FCC allows ROS to be used in the USAâ
only by WE9XLQ
Making up for lost ground
OK, Thanks for your answer :)
LA5VNA Steinar
On 03.08.2010 07:06, Tony wrote:
> Steinar,
>
> I've been monitoring ROS on-the-air and I've done some testing with the
> HF path simulator. In my opinion, it's about as good as one would expect
> from an MFSK mode with a relatively slow baud rate
Steinar,
I've been monitoring ROS on-the-air and I've done some testing with the
HF path simulator. In my opinion, it's about as good as one would expect
from an MFSK mode with a relatively slow baud rate. Tests show that it
will outperform RTTY and PSK31 in poor channel conditions (most MFSK
OK, is it public ? I can't find anything on digitalradio yahoogroup
LA5VNA Steinar
On 02.08.2010 12:58, Tony wrote:
> On 8/1/2010 7:31 AM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tony
>>
>> Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty ,
>> olivia etc?
>>
> Yes I have Steinar
>
On 8/1/2010 7:31 AM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi Tony
Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty ,
olivia etc?
Yes I have Steinar
Tony -K2MO
a5vna Steinar
On 20.07.2010 03:42, Tony wrote:
> All,
>
> With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought
Hi Tony
Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty ,
olivia etc?
la5vna Steinar
On 20.07.2010 03:42, Tony wrote:
> All,
>
> With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought it would
be interesting to see how the narrow mode compared to the wide version
>A safety pin on a gun, doesn't make the gun less destructive Sigi...
Right but prevents loosing a shot by accident while the gun is in your
pocket
There are still users that do not know what is the soft doing in the
background as not all users read the news (this group and others)
If ever
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Siegfried Jackstien"
wrote:
>
> So every user should switch that off and spot only by hand
>
The programmer shouldn't use clusters to promote his software! That's the whole
point. Jose Nieto-Ros intentionally misuses propagation tools like DX clusters
a
Hi Laurie
Great link! Thanks :)
La5vna Steinar
On 25.07.2010 09:07, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
> Yes Dave,
>
> Apart from my test PC virus/malware protection, whenever there is a
> change in an executable or dll I run them through an online scanner
> (20MB file limit) here http://virusscan.
Laurie,
Then why don't they filter it at the cluster?
Makes more sence, if you ask me.
Cheerio! Kr. Bonne.
Op 25-07-10 04:01, Laurie, VK3AMA schreef:
> Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users
> contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster.
>
> de Lau
Thanks, Laurie.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Laurie, VK3AMA
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 3:08 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8
@rein
Function can be switched off (now) .. So why worry about?
But all user have to switch it off cause after installing it is set to on .
Greetz
Sigi
Dg9bfc
Yes Dave,
Apart from my test PC virus/malware protection, whenever there is a
change in an executable or dll I run them through an online scanner
(20MB file limit) here http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/
It runs the submitted file through 19 different scanners, with the
occasional false-posit
: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
> >Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
> >the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User.
To me, this attempted decept
Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users
contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster.
de Laurie, VK3AMA
On 25/07/2010 11:28 AM, F.R. Ashley wrote:
>>
> After reading endless posts about this software, I sincerely wonder why in
> heck anyone is even usin
Because, outside the US, there is a large EU user-base of ROS users
contributing a significant of unwanted spam to the Cluster.
de Laurie, VK3AMA
On 25/07/2010 11:28 AM, F.R. Ashley wrote:
>>
> After reading endless posts about this software, I sincerely wonder why in
> heck anyone is even usin
] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
>> >Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
>> >the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster
>> User.
>
> To me, this attempted deception has been obvious ever since the issue of
> any auto-spots came up.
Under the Skeds menu, then Cluster
de Laurie, VK3AMA
On 24/07/2010 7:26 PM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
>
>
> Hi Siegfried
>
> I can't find this switch, where is it hiding?
>
>
> LA5VNA Steinar
>
>
>
>
> On 24.07.2010 10:03, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
>> Autospot can now be turned off with a switch
> >Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
> >the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User.
To me, this attempted deception has been obvious ever since the issue of
any auto-spots came up.
Isn't there any honesty at all possible with t
2010 6:44 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
>
>Hi Sigi,
>Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
>the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User.
>
>
Hi Sigi,
Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster User.
Jose, clearly doesn't understand the Ham/Cluster culture.
Maybe we can change his attitude by passing on these concerns to his
Beta-Tester who
Glad i could help
Iif you do NOT use cat the autogenerated spots on 20m are sent as 14000 . so
not correct
But when sending by hand qrg is correct
I asked jose if he can solve that . that a user without can do not send
wrong qrg . maybe he will find a solution for that
As we have now the aut
Aha, this switch was not implemented in the version 4.8.2 that I was
testing.
la5vna Steinar
On 24.07.2010 16:23, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
> Iin the tab skets click on cluster
>
> There you can send spots manually and switch off the autospotting
>
> I let the newest version run for a few hou
Iin the tab skets click on cluster
There you can send spots manually and switch off the autospotting
I let the newest version run for a few hours >>> not autospots were sent
when switch was off
You can send autogenerated and in downloaded newest version the switch is
set normally to on . so as t
Hi Siegfried
I can't find this switch, where is it hiding?
LA5VNA Steinar
On 24.07.2010 10:03, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
> Autospot can now be turned off with a switch
>
> Spotting by hand is possible
>
> So jose did some major changes in that way
>
> Now we have 2 programms running in ba
Autospot can now be turned off with a switch
Spotting by hand is possible
So jose did some major changes in that way
Now we have 2 programms running in background of the soft ros
One sends spots to cluster via telnet
And the other sends spots to psk reporter page for display them on a map
Gre
Hi Steinar,
Unfortunately, v4.8.x of ROS still spams the DX Cluster with auto-spots.
Only way to effectively stop is block adif.exe at the firewall.
ROS Auto-Spots too Cluster currently represent 98% of all ROS Cluster
spots, with ROS representing 6.2% of all Cluster spots (7 day period).
As f
Hi all,
It seems that the latest ROS is not spamming the cluster.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Thanks for the testing Tony. We observe Doppler shifts of as much as 100
Hz and Doppler spreads around 50 Hz or greater. On SSB phone, a S3
signal will not be intelligible and you can hear the voice pitch go down
in a fluttering manner. ROS definitely produces nothing but garbage when
SSB phone
On 7/20/2010 3:54 PM, KH6TY wrote:
>Our on-air tests show that ROS 16 baud, 2200 Hz wide spread spectrum
was very poor on UHF under Doppler >spreading. Can you confirm this with
flutter tests like Jaak has done.
Skip,
My path tests show that ROS is less tolerant to Doppler spread than
Olivi
Tony,
Our on-air tests show that ROS 16 baud, 2200 Hz wide spread spectrum was
very poor on UHF under Doppler spreading. Can you confirm this with
flutter tests like Jaak has done on
http://contestia.blogspot.com/p/pathsim_09.html ?
73, Skip KH6TY
On 7/19/2010 9:42 PM, Tony wrote:
All,
W
All,
With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought it would
be interesting to see how the narrow mode compared to the wide version
under the controlled environment of the HF path simulator. After a few
hours of testing, it seems there's little difference between the two.
The
it deserves pages and
>> pages
>>> of emails about it? Remember that other new digital mode a few months
>> ago,
>>> and how great it was, or have you forgotten abouit it already?
>>>
>>> 73 Buddy WB4M
>>> RTTY forever
>>&g
; - Original Message -
> From: "Steinar Aanesland"
> To: "* Digitalradio" ; "*
ROSDIGITALMODEMGROU"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:45 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] ROS Returns
>
>
>> ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out..
>>
>> ht
It would appear that what is does best is the continued mutilation of horse
corpses.
de Curt KC8STE/AAR5VR
73
--- On Wed, 7/14/10, J. Moen wrote:
From: J. Moen
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS back bigger and better !
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 10:53 PM
I had new vers 4.7 running here overnight without stoppages.
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Siegfried Jackstien
>Sent: Jul 15, 2010 3:29 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS back bigger and better !
>
>Hello steinar
>
&
Not the latest , but I will ;)
la5vna Steinar
On 15.07.2010 21:29, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
> Hello steinar
>
> Did not have the time yet to try
>
> I use the old 1.0 with a firewall
>
> That works okay
>
> Did you try the newer versions with sandbox???
>
> Greetz
>
> Sigi
>
>
>
>
>
Hello steinar
Did not have the time yet to try
I use the old 1.0 with a firewall
That works okay
Did you try the newer versions with sandbox???
Greetz
Sigi
Hi Siegfried
Do you get the sandboxie software working ?
la5vna Steinar
On 15.07.2010 20:59, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
> Bigger ? yes . making MORE trouble hi hi
>
> Better? No . as the mode is not changed and the frontend is also not changed
>
> The only change is that now you can not use
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS back bigger and better !
Spain kicks another goal !!!
> v4.7.0 Beta
>
> By suggestion of CO2DC and "The man of the Vara" I will continue to
> develop ROS.
>
> A new Sked page have been linked to ROS software.
http://www
it was, or have you forgotten abouit it already?
>
> 73 Buddy WB4M
> RTTY forever
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steinar Aanesland" >
> To: "* Digitalradio"
> >;
> "* ROSDIGITALMODEMGROU"
>
> >
> Sent: We
einar Aanesland"
To: "* Digitalradio" ; "* ROSDIGITALMODEMGROU"
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS Returns
> ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out..
>
> http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
>
> S
>
>
>
ROS v4.7.0 Beta is out..
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
S
Why?
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Rein A wrote:
>
>
> CLOSING GROUP TOMORROW EVE.
> IF YOU NEED TO COPY ANYTHING, GET ER DONE !
>
> DAVID/WD4KPD
>
>
CLOSING GROUP TOMORROW EVE.
IF YOU NEED TO COPY ANYTHING, GET ER DONE !
DAVID/WD4KPD
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosmodemusa/
Not very popular just 18 subscribers ( almost 4000 here )
73 Rein W6SZ
http://www.nitehawk.com/rasmit/
-Original Message-
>From: James Hall
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 11:09 AM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sendi
through with this little project you might understand or
> perhaps not why I am doing this.
>
> 73 Rein W6SZ
>
> I had to use Google to learn that expression.
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> >From: James Hall >
> >Sent: Jul 8, 2010 4:00 PM
> >To:
Just added adif exe to my firewall
No data in no data out
Can use ros now as I have no inet access
Jose does monitor eu traffic via twente . so does the soft send (hidden)
data on the air??? I do not know . but I do not matter about cause I have
absolutely no passwords (except the gmail password
With this action (or inaction) from Mr ROS and considering all of his
past actions/comments it becomes clear (to me) that he has an agenda and
Hams are being used as beta-testers to help fulfil his ultimate goal.
He has shown several times an unwillingness to embrace "Ham Spirit" and
"Ham Opera
Just goes to show that he reads the boards and keeps track of what is going
on.
Now, how easy would it be to program a button to disable the function with
one toggle in the software? Very easy! Then he could open it to everyone
to decide whether they want the reporting or not. Since he won't a
from his website
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/07/10/ros-and-cluster/
Jose says...
> ROS uses a system that send reports to the DX Cluster automatically.
>
> This is useful to know who are listen you and the system is done so as not
> to saturate the cluster (only send some spot).
>
> If y
Call me old fashioned but after the way the developer of the ROS mode
treated the global amateur radio community, i.e, malice, deceit and
disrespect earlier in the year I wouldn't use ROS if it "were" legal in the
U.S.
Just my .05 cents due to inflation.
73 & GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakel
gt;From: Dave AA6YQ
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 5:16 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>>>>AA6YQ comments below
>
>-Original Message-
>From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoog
ector?
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 3:01 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>At 01:44 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
>>John,
>>
>&
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 4:31 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your P
Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Moore
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 3:47 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>Given the author's animosity toward certain hams, the fact that he stated he
>was doin
rom: mikea
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 4:11 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:47:51PM -0700, Jeff Moore wrote:
>
>> As for the 3000 people that are being quiet on this list, how much of
>>
to discuss issues related to digital modes? A digital mode with a list of
banned calls?
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Dave AA6YQ
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 3:52 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:47:51PM -0700, Jeff Moore wrote:
> As for the 3000 people that are being quiet on this list, how much of
> that is that they don't want to be singled out by a psychotic non-ham
> software author for inclusion in his list??
This is my first -- and, I hope, my last -- pos
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of "John Becker, WOJAB"
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:01 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data
ctor
I will keep your input just between you and me.
Don't want to be involved. Please let me just play. I am tired, don't bother me
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 2:18 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>
The discussion of the persona-non-grata list was started here:
http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=239742&highlight=ros. It starts
getting pretty interesting around page 4 or 5.
In March, the list consisted of the following calls: *
K5OKC,N1SZ,G4ILO,W4PC,W9IQ,KY5U,KQ6XA,G0GQK,N3RQ,N1SZ,KC4ARAN
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:59 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
John,
Why not give it a serious try? It's is worth getting to the bottom of this
or perhaps not
At 01:44 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
>John,
>
>Who is Andy, K3UK?
Andy is the list owner.
And yes anyone can discuss ROS at any point and time.
And many are still looking for an answer of why
some (at one point or another) was banned from using
the program.
Now you seem to be a spokesperson for J
n Becker, WØJAB"
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 2:18 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>I think many would like to have a answer once and for all
>on this issue if some have been "banned" from using the
>soft
@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>I think many would like to have a answer once and for all
>on this issue if some have been "banned" from using the
>software.
>
>John, W0JAB
>digitalradio co moderator
>
>At 12:54 PM
I think many would like to have a answer once and for all
on this issue if some have been "banned" from using the
software.
John, W0JAB
digitalradio co moderator
At 12:54 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
>Could this ROS discussion be taken offline or elsewhere?
>
>I expect others, like I, are sick of th
After loading a "updated" version as he said that everyone
needed to do. After entering my call it would not work.
Just like others have posted that they could no longer use it.
I have not tried it again and will not try it.
Touch a hot stove and get burned one will not touch it again.
I will ne
e.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: rein...@ix.netcom.com [mailto:rein...@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:43 PM
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>
> OK John.
>
> Understood.
>
ssage-
>From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
>Sent: Jul 9, 2010 1:14 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>Sorry Rein -
>
>Please forgive as that was about the time I was having big time
>computer pro
Sorry Rein -
Please forgive as that was about the time I was having big time
computer problems. Lost a bunch of emails.
what was that my "final question" again.
John, W0JAB
ahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>At 08:58 AM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
>
>> extremely wicked; "nefarious schemes"; "a villainous plot"; "a villainous
>> band of thieves"
>
>Rein are you trying to te
At 08:58 AM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
> extremely wicked; "nefarious schemes"; "a villainous plot"; "a villainous
> band of thieves"
Rein are you trying to tell us that NONE of this never happened ?
The list of banned, and other thing that have been posted that this
program has been said to do.
Thi
tems work excites you?
Once I am through with this little project you might understand or
perhaps not why I am doing this.
73 Rein W6SZ
I had to use Google to learn that expression.
-Original Message-
>From: James Hall
>Sent: Jul 8, 2010 4:00 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.c
Looks like this is a DX Cluster server available on the Internet running a
software package called DXSpider.
http://wiki.dxcluster.org/index.php/Main_Page Doesn't seem to be nefarious
at all to me. Telnet in, give your callsign and it'll start giving you info.
I have no clue how to read this but th
I finally installed ROS and it triggered my firewall trying to connect
to 109.72.112.37 port 7300.
I did a Telnet, it is Cluster Node US6IQ-1
Today I again started ROS and this time the firewall triggered on ROS
connecting to 82.182.70.198 port 8000, which is Cluster Node SM6YOU-2
I have never
rom: Steinar Aanesland
>Sent: Jul 8, 2010 4:25 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>
>Yes , that is what is seems to me Rein.
>
>Let me try to explain the in my Norwegian English.
>Lest assume you are on mister
d
>Sent: Jul 8, 2010 4:25 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>
>Yes , that is what is seems to me Rein.
>
>Let me try to explain the in my Norwegian English.
>Lest assume you are on mister ROS's hate l
At 02:28 PM 7/8/2010, you wrote:
>Hi Rain
>
>You have absolutely right . ROS are sending data from your PC to the
>cluster. Try to type the IP address 90.225.73.203:8000 into your
>browser and you get this:
Why would it telnet to an IP address in Sweden?
m: Steinar Aanesland
>> Sent: Jul 8, 2010 3:28 PM
>> To: * Digitalradio
>> Subject: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>>
>> Hi Rain
>>
>> You have absolutely right . ROS are sending data from your PC to the
>> cluster. Try to type the IP a
W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Steinar Aanesland
>Sent: Jul 8, 2010 3:28 PM
>To: * Digitalradio
>Subject: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC
>
>Hi Rain
>
>You have absolutely right . ROS are sending data from your PC to the
>cluster. Try to type th
Hi Rain
You have absolutely right . ROS are sending data from your PC to the
cluster. Try to type the IP address 90.225.73.203:8000 into your
browser and you get this:
login: GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: 90.225.73.203:8000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nb-NO; rv:1.9.2.6)
Gecko/20
eld to SWL status.
> You should find it around 7.053 to 7.056.
>
> phil
> n4zsa
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:43 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] ROS on 40 meters
>
&
adio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 1:43 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS on 40 meters
What freq is the ROS mode being used on 40 Meters?
World like to play with it a bit.
John
If I download a new version I will "NOT" be able to use
the program. For a unknown reason I was one of the people
that Jose has seen unfit to use it.
That was the reason I had to "beg" for a earlier venison of it.
But thanks for your reply.
At 03:50 PM 7/5/2010, you wrote:
>If you downloa
If you download and installed the newest version you will find the qrg in
the software
You CAN use it with rig control and set the right qrg via serial port . but
you can also use a rig without cat and tune in by hand
The qrg of ALL bands can be found in the soft in the frequency tab
Dg9bfc
Sig
What freq is the ROS mode being used on 40 Meters?
World like to play with it a bit.
John
And cause QRM in the beacon subband...
So much for the "Gentlemen's Agreement"!
Wes W1LIC
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 7:42:58 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS 10 meters
FYI
"Changes on 10 meters
29 May, 201
On 06/02/2010 12:15 PM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
> let's forget about this "Mr. Ros without manners" and his new a Yahoo list.
>
> There is a lot of decent programmers out there, making excellent HAM
> software. Mr. Ros is not worth the attention he and he's
> frequency-hopping spread spectrum so
--- On Wed, 2/6/10, Dave Sparks wrote:
> Found the section. It is
> 97.309(a)(4) of the code:
>
> http://www.arrl.org/technical-characteristics
>
> The reverse-engineering part is an inference on my part.
No chance of reverse-engineering Pactor III from the information provided.
73 Trevor M5
bject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
> Hello Dave,
>
> Don't sse ypou much anymore on HF WSJT ,changes in antenna?
>
> OK and thanks.
>
> I contacted the people in VA and they replied right away. telling me
> that they had stopped the mode. as a result of
: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
> Hello Dave, AF6AS,
>
> "IIRC" what does it stand for?
>
> There has to be enough information to at least reverse-engineer a mode by
> the FCC (and the NSA).
>
> Is that documented somewhere, not that I want to question the
ahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
>
>IIRC = "if I remember correctly".
>
>The documentation issue stemmed from someone who complained that PACTOR, and
>maybe other digital modes, could be considered "codes or cyphers", and the
>
n HF by the FCC. It is
admittedly Spread Spectrum.
--
Dave - AF6AS
--
From:
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:01 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
> Hello Dave, AF6AS,
>
> "IIRC" what does it stand f
be able to read/decode it under all
circumstances "
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Dave Sparks
>Sent: Jun 2, 2010 2:14 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
>
>Oops, I missed that.
>
>What I *THOUG
ohn Becker, WØJAB"
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
I think that is what I said below now in RED
By my call I mean W0JAB
At 12:44 PM 6/2/2010, you wrote:
- Original Message -
I think that is what I said below now in RED
By my call I mean W0JAB
At 12:44 PM 6/2/2010, you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>> But since I have it on a flash drive I did install it on the laptop and
>> gave it a call other then my call and it worked fine.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
